81_FR_35422 81 FR 35316 - Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part

81 FR 35316 - Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in Part

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 106 (June 2, 2016)

Page Range35316-35319
FR Document2016-12965

The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (corrosion- resistant steel) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) are being sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV), as provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The final weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed in the ``Final Determination Margins'' section of this notice. The period of investigation is October 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 106 (Thursday, June 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35316-35319]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-026]


Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in 
Part

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) determines that 
imports of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (corrosion-
resistant steel) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) are being 
sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV), as provided 
in section 735 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The 
final weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV are listed in 
the ``Final Determination Margins'' section of this notice. The period 
of investigation is October 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015.

DATED: Effective Date: June 2, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Decker or Andrew Huston, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0196 
or (202) 482-4261, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Department published the Preliminary Determination on January 
4,

[[Page 35317]]

2016.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department 
published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion 
of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, may be 
found in the Final Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Final Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Final 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Final Decision Memorandum and 
the electronic version are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the 
People's Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final 
Determination, 81 FR 75 (January 4, 2016) (Preliminary 
Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the 
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 
Products from the People's Republic of China,'' (Final Decision 
Memorandum), dated concurrently with this determination and hereby 
adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is corrosion-resistant 
steel from the PRC. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix II 
of this notice.

Scope Comments

    In accordance with the Preliminary Scope Determination,\3\ the 
Department set aside a period of time for parties to address scope 
issues in case briefs or other written comments on scope issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's 
Republic of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: 
Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Determinations,'' dated December 21, 2015 (``Preliminary Scope 
Decision Memorandum''). See also Memorandum to the File, ``Certain 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the People's Republic of 
China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Correction 
to Preliminary Determination Scope Memorandum,'' dated January 29, 
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal 
responses submitted to the record of this final determination, and 
accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, 
see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\4\ The Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum is incorporated by, and hereby adopted by, this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final Determinations,'' 
dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 
this investigation are addressed in the Final Decision Memorandum 
accompanying this notice. A list of the issues raised and to which the 
Department responded is attached to this notice as Appendix I.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Act, in January 2016, the 
Department verified the sales and cost data reported by the mandatory 
respondent Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd. (Yieh Phui), 
pursuant to section 782(i) of the Act. We used standard verification 
procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and 
production records, and original source documents provided by 
respondents.

Changes to the Margin Calculations Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on the Department's analysis of the comments received and our 
findings at verification, we made certain changes to our margin 
calculations. For a discussion of these changes, see the Final Decision 
Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Final Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Combination Rates

    As stated in the Initiation Notice,\6\ the Department calculated 
combination rates for the respondents that are eligible for a separate 
rate in this investigation. Policy Bulletin 05.1 describes this 
practice.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Italy, 
India, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and 
Taiwan: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 
37228 (June 30, 2015) (Initiation Notice).
    \7\ See Enforcement and Compliance's Policy Bulletin No. 05.1, 
regarding, ``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination 
Rates in Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy 
Countries,'' (April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on 
the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part

    Prior to the Preliminary Determination, the Department found that 
critical circumstances exist with respect to imports of corrosion-
resistant steel from the PRC produced or exported by the PRC-wide 
entity (which, as noted below, includes Hebei Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. 
(Tangshan Branch) (Tangshan) and Baoshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. 
(Baoshan)).\8\ We are not modifying our findings for this final 
determination.\9\ Thus, pursuant to section 735(a)(3)(B) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.206(h)(1)-(2), we find that critical circumstances exist 
with respect to subject merchandise produced or exported by the PRC-
wide entity, but do not exist for Yieh Phui and the other producers/
exporters entitled to a separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations of 
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From India, Italy, the People's 
Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Preliminary 
Determinations of Critical Circumstances, 80 FR 68504 (November 5, 
2015).
    \9\ For a full description of the methodology and results of our 
analysis, see the Final Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rate

    Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the rate for all other 
companies that have not been individually examined is normally an 
amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually 
investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any 
margins determined entirely on the basis of facts available. In this 
final determination, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin 
for Yieh Phui (the only cooperating mandatory respondent) which is not 
zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. Accordingly, we 
determine to use Yieh Phui's weighted-average dumping margin as the 
margin for the separate rate companies.

PRC-Wide Rate

    In our Preliminary Determination, we found that the PRC-wide 
entity, which includes Baoshan, Tangshan, and other PRC exporters and/
or producers that did not respond to the Department's requests for 
information, failed to provide necessary information, withheld 
information requested by the Department, failed to provide information 
in a timely manner, and significantly impeded this proceeding by not 
submitting the requested information. As a result, we preliminarily 
determined to calculate the PRC-wide rate on the basis of adverse facts 
available (AFA). We examined whether the highest petition margin was 
less than or equal to the

[[Page 35318]]

highest calculated margin, and determined that the highest calculated 
margin of 255.80 percent was the higher of the two. Thus, for the 
Preliminary Determination, we assigned to the PRC-wide entity a dumping 
margin of 255.80 percent, the highest calculated margin. This rate was 
Yieh Phui's preliminary calculated margin. For this final 
determination, Yieh Phui's calculated margin changed to 209.97 percent, 
and it is still the highest calculated margin. Consistent with our 
practice, the Department selected Yieh Phui's highest calculated 
margin, as AFA, because this rate is higher than the highest petition 
rate in this investigation and therefore, sufficiently adverse to serve 
the purposes of facts available.\10\ Therefore, we assigned this rate 
to the PRC-wide entity for this final determination. Furthermore, there 
is no need to corroborate the selected margin because it is based on 
information submitted by Yieh Phui in the course of this investigation, 
i.e., it is not secondary information.\11\

Final Determination Margins

    The Department determines that the following weighted-average 
dumping margins, and cash deposit rates reflecting adjustments to the 
weighted-average dumping margins to account for export subsidies exist:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Weighted-
                                                                                      average      Cash  deposit
                   Exporter                                 Producer                  dumping          rate
                                                                                      margin      (percent) \12\
                                                                                     (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd.....  Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial          209.97          199.43
                                                 Co., Ltd..
Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co. Ltd..............  Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co.              209.97          199.43
                                                 Ltd..
Union Steel China.............................  Union Steel China...............          209.97          199.43
PRC-Wide Entity...............................  209.97..........................  ..............          199.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As detailed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Baoshan and 
Tangshan, mandatory respondents in this investigation, did not respond 
to our questionnaire and, thus, did not demonstrate that they were 
entitled to separate rates. We continue to find these companies to be 
part of the PRC-Wide Entity. Furthermore, because we did not receive 
quantity and value questionnaire responses or separate rate 
applications from numerous companies, the PRC-wide entity also includes 
these non-responsive companies.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Final Decision Memorandum for a detailed discussion.
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.308(c) and (d) and section 776(c) of the 
Act.
    \12\ See ``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section 
below.
    \13\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Quantity and Value 
Questionnaire Recipients'' (July 16, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose to parties in this proceeding the 
calculations performed for this final determination within five days of 
the date of public announcement of our final determination, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, the Department will 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to 
suspend liquidation of all entries of corrosion-resistant steel from 
the PRC, which were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after October 6, 2015 (for those entities for which 
we found critical circumstances exist) or on or after January 4, 2016, 
the date of publication in the Federal Register of the affirmative 
Preliminary Determination (for all entities for which we did not find 
critical circumstances exist). Further, pursuant to section 
735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, the Department will instruct CBP to 
require a cash deposit \14\ equal to the weighted-average amount by 
which the normal value exceeds U.S. price, adjusted where appropriate 
for export subsidies,\15\ as follows: (1) For the exporter/producer 
combinations listed in the table above, the cash deposit rate will be 
equal to the dumping margin which the Department determined in this 
final determination; (2) for all combinations of PRC exporters/
producers of merchandise under consideration which have not received 
their own separate rate above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to 
the dumping margin established for the PRC-wide entity; and (3) for all 
non-PRC exporters of merchandise under consideration which have not 
received their own separate rate above, the cash deposit rate will be 
equal to the cash deposit rate applicable to the PRC exporter/producer 
combination that supplied that non-PRC exporter. The suspension of 
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of 
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042 
(October 3, 2011).
    \15\ See section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, where the product under investigation is also 
subject to a concurrent countervailing duty investigation, we instruct 
CBP to require a cash deposit less the amount of the countervailing 
duty determined to constitute any export subsidies.\16\ Therefore, in 
the event that a countervailing duty order is issued and suspension of 
liquidation is resumed in the companion countervailing duty 
investigation on corrosion-resistant steel from the PRC, the Department 
will instruct CBP to require cash deposits adjusted by the amount of 
export subsidies, as appropriate. These adjustments are reflected in 
the final column of the rate chart, above. Until such suspension of 
liquidation is resumed in the companion countervailing duty 
investigation, and so long as suspension of liquidation continues under 
this antidumping duty investigation, the cash deposit rates for this 
antidumping duty investigation will be the rates identified in the 
weighted-average margin column in the rate chart, above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ In the companion countervailing duty (CVD) investigation, 
the Department preliminarily found that Yieh Phu did not receive 
export subsidies. As a result, we did not adjust any of the 
companies' AD cash deposit rates for export subsidies. In the 
concurrent final CVD investigation, we determined that the Yieh Phui 
did receive export subsidies. In addition, pursuant to section 
777A(f) of the Act, we normally adjust preliminary cash deposit 
rates for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through, where 
appropriate. However, in this case in the Preliminary Determination, 
we did not grant a domestic subsidy pass-through adjustment. See 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. We received no comments on this 
issues, and we have not changed this decision for this final 
determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the 
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) of our final determination. 
As our final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 
735(b)(2) of the

[[Page 35319]]

Act, the ITC will determine within 45 days whether the domestic 
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with 
material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of 
sales) for importation of the subject merchandise. If the ITC 
determines that such injury exists, the Department will issue an 
antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further 
instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of 
liquidation.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, 
this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties subject to an 
APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in 
accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: May 24, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part
IV. Scope Comments
V. Scope of the Investigation
VI. Changes Since the Preliminary Determinations
VII. Use of Adverse Facts Available
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Ocean Freight Surrogate Value
    Comment 2: Byproduct Offset
    Comment 3: Hot-Rolled Steel Surrogate Value
    Comment 4: Surrogate Financial Ratios
IX. Recommendation

Appendix II--Scope of the Investigation

    The products covered by this investigation are certain flat-
rolled steel products, either clad, plated, or coated with 
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, 
aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based alloys, whether or not corrugated 
or painted, varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating. The 
products covered include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm or 
greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in successively 
superimposed layers, spirally oscillating, etc.). The products 
covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in straight 
lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7 
mm or greater and that measures at least 10 times the thickness. The 
products covered also include products not in coils (e.g., in 
straight lengths) of a thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width 
exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least twice the thickness. The 
products described above may be rectangular, square, circular, or 
other shape and include products of either rectangular or non-
rectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved 
subsequent to the rolling process, i.e., products which have been 
``worked after rolling'' (e.g., products which have been beveled or 
rounded at the edges). For purposes of the width and thickness 
requirements referenced above:
    (1) Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is 
within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual 
measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions 
set forth above, and
    (2) where the width and thickness vary for a specific product 
(e.g., the thickness of certain products with non-rectangular cross-
section, the width of certain products with non-rectangular shape, 
etc.), the measurement at its greatest width or thickness applies.
    Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are 
products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or 
less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds 
the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:

 2.50 percent of manganese, or
 3.30 percent of silicon, or
 1.50 percent of copper, or
 1.50 percent of aluminum, or
 1.25 percent of chromium, or
 0.30 percent of cobalt, or
 0.40 percent of lead, or
 2.00 percent of nickel, or
 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called wolfram), or
 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or
 0.10 percent of niobium (also called columbium), or
 0.30 percent of vanadium, or
 0.30 percent of zirconium

    Unless specifically excluded, products are included in this 
scope regardless of levels of boron and titanium.
    For example, specifically included in this scope are vacuum 
degassed, fully stabilized (commonly referred to as interstitial-
free (IF)) steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels. IF 
steels are recognized as low carbon steels with micro-alloying 
levels of elements such as titanium and/or niobium added to 
stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements. HSLA steels are recognized 
as steels with micro-alloying levels of elements such as chromium, 
copper, niobium, titanium, vanadium, and molybdenum.
    Furthermore, this scope also includes Advanced High Strength 
Steels (AHSS) and Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of which 
are considered high tensile strength and high elongation steels.
    Subject merchandise also includes corrosion-resistant steel that 
has been further processed in a third country, including but not 
limited to annealing, tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 
cutting, punching and/or slitting or any other processing that would 
not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the 
investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-
scope corrosion resistant steel.
    All products that meet the written physical description, and in 
which the chemistry quantities do not exceed any one of the noted 
element levels listed above, are within the scope of this 
investigation unless specifically excluded. The following products 
are outside of and/or specifically excluded from the scope of this 
investigation:
     Flat-rolled steel products either plated or coated with 
tin, lead, chromium, chromium oxides, both tin and lead (terne 
plate), or both chromium and chromium oxides (tin free steel), 
whether or not painted, varnished or coated with plastics or other 
non-metallic substances in addition to the metallic coating;
     Clad products in straight lengths of 4.7625 mm or more 
in composite thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 
measures at least twice the thickness; and
     Certain clad stainless flat-rolled products, which are 
three-layered corrosion-resistant flat-rolled steel products less 
than 4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist of a flat-rolled 
steel product clad on both sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%-
20% ratio.
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7210.30.0030, 7210.30.0060, 
7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030, 7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 
7210.61.0000, 7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060, 
7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 
7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 
7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and 7212.60.0000.
    The products subject to the investigation may also enter under 
the following HTSUS item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000, 
7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500, 7217.30.1530, 
7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000, 7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 
7217.90.5090, 7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090, 
7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180, 7228.60.6000, 
7228.60.8000, and 7229.90.1000.
    The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the 
investigation is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2016-12965 Filed 6-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                    35316                            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices

                                                    7210.90.9000, 7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030,                 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                        automatically initiate and conduct a
                                                    7212.30.1090, 7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000,                                                                               review to determine whether revocation
                                                    7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,                 International Trade Administration                            of a countervailing or antidumping duty
                                                    and 7212.60.0000.
                                                       The products subject to the investigation                                                                            order or termination of an investigation
                                                                                                              Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
                                                    may also enter under the following HTSUS                                                                                suspended under section 704 or 734 of
                                                                                                              Order, Finding, or Suspended
                                                    item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000,                                                                               the Act would be likely to lead to
                                                    7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500,                 Investigation; Advance Notification of
                                                                                                                                                                            continuation or recurrence of dumping
                                                    7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000,                 Sunset Reviews
                                                                                                                                                                            or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
                                                    7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090,
                                                    7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090,
                                                                                                              AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,                          may be) and of material injury.
                                                    7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180,                 International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                              Department of Commerce.                                       Upcoming Sunset Reviews for July 2016
                                                    7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and
                                                    7229.90.1000.                                                                                                              The following Sunset Reviews are
                                                       The HTSUS subheadings above are
                                                                                                              Background
                                                                                                                                                                            scheduled for initiation in July 2016 and
                                                    provided for convenience and customs                        Every five years, pursuant to section
                                                    purposes only. The written description of the                                                                           will appear in that month’s Notice of
                                                                                                              751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                    scope of the investigation is dispositive.                amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of                      Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–12975 Filed 6–1–16; 8:45 am]                Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the                         (‘‘Sunset Review’’).
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                    International Trade Commission

                                                                                                                                                                                           Department contact

                                                                                                                      Antidumping Duty Proceedings
                                                    Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Belgium (A–423–808) (3rd Review) ............................................        Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
                                                    Heavy Forged Hand Tools, With or Without Handles from China (A–570–803) (3rd Review) ..........                          Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
                                                    Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Japan (A–588–845) (3rd Review) ..............................              David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                    Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the Republic of Korea (A–580–834) (3rd Review) .....                       David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                    Ammonium Nitrate from Russia (A–821–811) (3rd Review) ...............................................................    David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                    Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa (A–791–805) (3rd Review) .....................................          Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
                                                    Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from Taiwan (A–583–830) (3rd Review) .............................................        Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
                                                    Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from Taiwan (A–583–831) (3rd Review) ............................               David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                                                                                     Countervailing Duty Proceedings
                                                    Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils from the Republic of Korea (C–580–835) (3rd Review) .....                       David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                    Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from South Africa (C–791–806) (3rd Review) .....................................          David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
                                                                                                                         Suspended Investigations
                                                    No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in July 2016.



                                                       The Department’s procedures for the                      This notice is not required by statute                      from the People’s Republic of China
                                                    conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth                   but is published as a service to the                          (PRC) are being sold in the United States
                                                    in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of                          international trading community.                              at less than fair value (LTFV), as
                                                    Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)                        Dated: May 24, 2016.                                        provided in section 735 of the Tariff Act
                                                    Reviews provides further information                      Christian Marsh,                                              of 1930, as amended (the Act). The final
                                                    regarding what is required of all parties                 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping                    weighted-average dumping margins of
                                                    to participate in Sunset Reviews.                         and Countervailing Duty Operations.                           sales at LTFV are listed in the ‘‘Final
                                                       Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the                     [FR Doc. 2016–12952 Filed 6–1–16; 8:45 am]                    Determination Margins’’ section of this
                                                    Department will maintain and make                         BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                                                                                            notice. The period of investigation is
                                                    available a service list for these                                                                                      October 1, 2014, through March 31,
                                                    proceedings. To facilitate the timely                                                                                   2015.
                                                    preparation of the service list(s), it is                 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                                                                                                                                            DATED:   Effective Date: June 2, 2016.
                                                    requested that those seeking recognition
                                                                                                              International Trade Administration                            FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                    as interested parties to a proceeding
                                                    contact the Department in writing                         [A–570–026]                                                   Nancy Decker or Andrew Huston, AD/
                                                    within 10 days of the publication of the                                                                                CVD Operations, Office VII,
                                                                                                              Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel                             Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                    Notice of Initiation.
                                                                                                              Products From the People’s Republic                           International Trade Administration,
                                                       Please note that if the Department                     of China: Final Determination of Sales                        U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
                                                    receives a Notice of Intent to Participate                at Less Than Fair Value, and Final                            Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                                    from a member of the domestic industry                    Affirmative Critical Circumstances                            Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    within 15 days of the date of initiation,                 Determination, in Part                                        482–0196 or (202) 482–4261,
                                                    the review will continue. Thereafter,                                                                                   respectively.
                                                                                                              AGENCY:  Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                    any interested party wishing to
                                                                                                              International Trade Administration,
                                                    participate in the Sunset Review must                                                                                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                              Department of Commerce.
                                                    provide substantive comments in
                                                                                                              SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce                           Background
                                                    response to the notice of initiation no
                                                                                                              (the Department) determines that
                                                    later than 30 days after the date of                                                                                      The Department published the
                                                                                                              imports of certain corrosion-resistant
                                                    initiation.                                                                                                             Preliminary Determination on January 4,
                                                                                                              steel products (corrosion-resistant steel)


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014    18:30 Jun 01, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00024    Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM       02JNN1


                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices                                                     35317

                                                    2016.1 A summary of the events that                     responses submitted to the record of this              that critical circumstances exist with
                                                    occurred since the Department                           final determination, and accompanying                  respect to imports of corrosion-resistant
                                                    published the Preliminary                               discussion and analysis of all comments                steel from the PRC produced or
                                                    Determination, as well as a full                        timely received, see the Final Scope                   exported by the PRC-wide entity
                                                    discussion of the issues raised by parties              Decision Memorandum.4 The Final                        (which, as noted below, includes Hebei
                                                    for this final determination, may be                    Scope Decision Memorandum is                           Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (Tangshan Branch)
                                                    found in the Final Decision                             incorporated by, and hereby adopted by,                (Tangshan) and Baoshan Iron & Steel
                                                    Memorandum.2 The Final Decision                         this notice.                                           Co., Ltd. (Baoshan)).8 We are not
                                                    Memorandum is a public document and                                                                            modifying our findings for this final
                                                                                                            Analysis of Comments Received
                                                    is on file electronically via Enforcement                                                                      determination.9 Thus, pursuant to
                                                    and Compliance’s Antidumping and                           All issues raised in the case and                   section 735(a)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
                                                    Countervailing Duty Centralized                         rebuttal briefs by parties in this                     CFR 351.206(h)(1)–(2), we find that
                                                    Electronic Service System (ACCESS).                     investigation are addressed in the Final               critical circumstances exist with respect
                                                    ACCESS is available to registered users                 Decision Memorandum accompanying                       to subject merchandise produced or
                                                    at http://access.trade.gov, and is                      this notice. A list of the issues raised               exported by the PRC-wide entity, but do
                                                    available to all parties in the Central                 and to which the Department responded                  not exist for Yieh Phui and the other
                                                    Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main                    is attached to this notice as Appendix I.              producers/exporters entitled to a
                                                    Department of Commerce building. In                     Verification                                           separate rate.
                                                    addition, a complete version of the Final
                                                    Decision Memorandum can be accessed                       As provided in section 782(i) of the                 Separate Rate
                                                    directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/               Act, in January 2016, the Department                     Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
                                                    frn/. The signed Final Decision                         verified the sales and cost data reported              the rate for all other companies that
                                                    Memorandum and the electronic                           by the mandatory respondent Yieh Phui
                                                                                                                                                                   have not been individually examined is
                                                    version are identical in content.                       (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd. (Yieh
                                                                                                                                                                   normally an amount equal to the
                                                                                                            Phui), pursuant to section 782(i) of the
                                                    Scope of the Investigation                                                                                     weighted average of the estimated
                                                                                                            Act. We used standard verification
                                                                                                                                                                   weighted-average dumping margins
                                                       The product covered by this                          procedures, including an examination of
                                                                                                                                                                   established for exporters and producers
                                                    investigation is corrosion-resistant steel              relevant accounting and production
                                                                                                                                                                   individually investigated, excluding any
                                                    from the PRC. For a complete                            records, and original source documents
                                                                                                                                                                   zero and de minimis margins, and any
                                                    description of the scope of this                        provided by respondents.
                                                                                                                                                                   margins determined entirely on the
                                                    investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the                   Changes to the Margin Calculations                     basis of facts available. In this final
                                                    Investigation,’’ in Appendix II of this                 Since the Preliminary Determination                    determination, we calculated a
                                                    notice.                                                                                                        weighted-average dumping margin for
                                                                                                               Based on the Department’s analysis of
                                                    Scope Comments                                          the comments received and our findings                 Yieh Phui (the only cooperating
                                                      In accordance with the Preliminary                    at verification, we made certain changes               mandatory respondent) which is not
                                                    Scope Determination,3 the Department                    to our margin calculations. For a                      zero, de minimis, or based entirely on
                                                    set aside a period of time for parties to               discussion of these changes, see the                   facts available. Accordingly, we
                                                    address scope issues in case briefs or                  Final Decision Memorandum.5                            determine to use Yieh Phui’s weighted-
                                                    other written comments on scope issues.                                                                        average dumping margin as the margin
                                                                                                            Combination Rates                                      for the separate rate companies.
                                                      For a summary of the product
                                                    coverage comments and rebuttal                             As stated in the Initiation Notice,6 the            PRC-Wide Rate
                                                                                                            Department calculated combination
                                                       1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products     rates for the respondents that are                       In our Preliminary Determination, we
                                                    From the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative        eligible for a separate rate in this                   found that the PRC-wide entity, which
                                                    Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than         investigation. Policy Bulletin 05.1                    includes Baoshan, Tangshan, and other
                                                    Fair Value and Postponement of Final                                                                           PRC exporters and/or producers that did
                                                    Determination, 81 FR 75 (January 4, 2016)
                                                                                                            describes this practice.7
                                                    (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying
                                                                                                                                                                   not respond to the Department’s
                                                                                                            Final Affirmative Determination of                     requests for information, failed to
                                                    Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
                                                       2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
                                                                                                            Critical Circumstances, in Part                        provide necessary information,
                                                    Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and                   Prior to the Preliminary                             withheld information requested by the
                                                    Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,        Determination, the Department found                    Department, failed to provide
                                                    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                    Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for                                                               information in a timely manner, and
                                                    the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty
                                                                                                               4 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
                                                                                                                                                                   significantly impeded this proceeding
                                                    Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel      Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and                by not submitting the requested
                                                    Products from the People’s Republic of China,’’         Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Scope Comments
                                                                                                            Decision Memorandum for the Final                      information. As a result, we
                                                    (Final Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently
                                                    with this determination and hereby adopted by this      Determinations,’’ dated concurrently with this         preliminarily determined to calculate
                                                    notice.                                                 notice.                                                the PRC-wide rate on the basis of
                                                                                                               5 See Final Decision Memorandum.
                                                       3 See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate                                                                adverse facts available (AFA). We
                                                                                                               6 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
                                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and                                                                 examined whether the highest petition
                                                    Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain               From Italy, India, the People’s Republic of China,
                                                                                                            the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of       margin was less than or equal to the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From the
                                                    People’s Republic of China, India, Italy, the           Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 37228
                                                    Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Scope Comments           (June 30, 2015) (Initiation Notice).                     8 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty

                                                    Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary                    7 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy           Investigations of Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
                                                    Determinations,’’ dated December 21, 2015               Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates         From India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
                                                    (‘‘Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum’’). See        Practice and Application of Combination Rates in       the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Preliminary
                                                    also Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Certain Corrosion-       Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market        Determinations of Critical Circumstances, 80 FR
                                                    Resistant Steel Products From the People’s Republic     Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy           68504 (November 5, 2015).
                                                    of China, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and      Bulletin 05.1), available on the Department’s Web        9 For a full description of the methodology and

                                                    Taiwan: Correction to Preliminary Determination         site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-    results of our analysis, see the Final Decision
                                                    Scope Memorandum,’’ dated January 29, 2016.             1.pdf.                                                 Memorandum.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:30 Jun 01, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00025   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM   02JNN1


                                                    35318                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices

                                                    highest calculated margin, and                                      Consistent with our practice, the                                        Yieh Phui in the course of this
                                                    determined that the highest calculated                              Department selected Yieh Phui’s highest                                  investigation, i.e., it is not secondary
                                                    margin of 255.80 percent was the higher                             calculated margin, as AFA, because this                                  information.11
                                                    of the two. Thus, for the Preliminary                               rate is higher than the highest petition
                                                    Determination, we assigned to the PRC-                              rate in this investigation and therefore,                                Final Determination Margins
                                                    wide entity a dumping margin of 255.80                              sufficiently adverse to serve the                                          The Department determines that the
                                                    percent, the highest calculated margin.                             purposes of facts available.10 Therefore,
                                                                                                                                                                                                 following weighted-average dumping
                                                    This rate was Yieh Phui’s preliminary                               we assigned this rate to the PRC-wide
                                                                                                                                                                                                 margins, and cash deposit rates
                                                    calculated margin. For this final                                   entity for this final determination.
                                                    determination, Yieh Phui’s calculated                               Furthermore, there is no need to                                         reflecting adjustments to the weighted-
                                                    margin changed to 209.97 percent, and                               corroborate the selected margin because                                  average dumping margins to account for
                                                    it is still the highest calculated margin.                          it is based on information submitted by                                  export subsidies exist:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Weighted-                  Cash
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           average                  deposit
                                                                                   Exporter                                                                         Producer                                              dumping                     rate
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           margin                 (percent) 12
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          (percent)

                                                    Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd. ................                   Yieh Phui (China) Technomaterial Co., Ltd. ................                                       209.97              199.43
                                                    Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co. Ltd. ..............................              Jiangyin Zongcheng Steel Co. Ltd. ..............................                                  209.97              199.43
                                                    Union Steel China ........................................................    Union Steel China ........................................................                        209.97              199.43
                                                    PRC-Wide Entity ...........................................................   209.97 ...........................................................................   ........................         199.43



                                                      As detailed in the Preliminary                                    publication in the Federal Register of                                   constitute any export subsidies.16
                                                    Decision Memorandum, Baoshan and                                    the affirmative Preliminary                                              Therefore, in the event that a
                                                    Tangshan, mandatory respondents in                                  Determination (for all entities for which                                countervailing duty order is issued and
                                                    this investigation, did not respond to                              we did not find critical circumstances                                   suspension of liquidation is resumed in
                                                    our questionnaire and, thus, did not                                exist). Further, pursuant to section                                     the companion countervailing duty
                                                    demonstrate that they were entitled to                              735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, the                                         investigation on corrosion-resistant steel
                                                    separate rates. We continue to find these                           Department will instruct CBP to require                                  from the PRC, the Department will
                                                    companies to be part of the PRC-Wide                                a cash deposit 14 equal to the weighted-                                 instruct CBP to require cash deposits
                                                    Entity. Furthermore, because we did not                             average amount by which the normal                                       adjusted by the amount of export
                                                    receive quantity and value                                          value exceeds U.S. price, adjusted                                       subsidies, as appropriate. These
                                                    questionnaire responses or separate rate                            where appropriate for export                                             adjustments are reflected in the final
                                                    applications from numerous companies,                               subsidies,15 as follows: (1) For the                                     column of the rate chart, above. Until
                                                    the PRC-wide entity also includes these                             exporter/producer combinations listed                                    such suspension of liquidation is
                                                    non-responsive companies.13                                         in the table above, the cash deposit rate                                resumed in the companion
                                                                                                                        will be equal to the dumping margin                                      countervailing duty investigation, and
                                                    Disclosure                                                          which the Department determined in                                       so long as suspension of liquidation
                                                      We intend to disclose to parties in                               this final determination; (2) for all                                    continues under this antidumping duty
                                                    this proceeding the calculations                                    combinations of PRC exporters/                                           investigation, the cash deposit rates for
                                                    performed for this final determination                              producers of merchandise under                                           this antidumping duty investigation will
                                                    within five days of the date of public                              consideration which have not received                                    be the rates identified in the weighted-
                                                    announcement of our final                                           their own separate rate above, the cash                                  average margin column in the rate chart,
                                                    determination, in accordance with 19                                deposit rate will be equal to the                                        above.
                                                    CFR 351.224(b).                                                     dumping margin established for the
                                                                                                                                                                                                 International Trade Commission
                                                                                                                        PRC-wide entity; and (3) for all non-PRC
                                                    Continuation of Suspension of                                                                                                                Notification
                                                                                                                        exporters of merchandise under
                                                    Liquidation                                                         consideration which have not received                                      In accordance with section 735(d) of
                                                       Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B) of the                          their own separate rate above, the cash                                  the Act, we will notify the U.S.
                                                    Act, the Department will instruct U.S.                              deposit rate will be equal to the cash                                   International Trade Commission (ITC) of
                                                    Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to                              deposit rate applicable to the PRC                                       our final determination. As our final
                                                    continue to suspend liquidation of all                              exporter/producer combination that                                       determination is affirmative, in
                                                    entries of corrosion-resistant steel from                           supplied that non-PRC exporter. The                                      accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the
                                                    the PRC, which were entered, or                                     suspension of liquidation instructions
                                                                                                                                                                                                    16 In the companion countervailing duty (CVD)
                                                    withdrawn from warehouse, for                                       will remain in effect until further notice.
                                                                                                                          As noted above, where the product                                      investigation, the Department preliminarily found
                                                    consumption on or after October 6, 2015                                                                                                      that Yieh Phu did not receive export subsidies. As
                                                    (for those entities for which we found                              under investigation is also subject to a                                 a result, we did not adjust any of the companies’
                                                    critical circumstances exist) or on or                              concurrent countervailing duty                                           AD cash deposit rates for export subsidies. In the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    after January 4, 2016, the date of                                  investigation, we instruct CBP to require                                concurrent final CVD investigation, we determined
                                                                                                                        a cash deposit less the amount of the                                    that the Yieh Phui did receive export subsidies. In
                                                                                                                                                                                                 addition, pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, we
                                                      10 See Final Decision Memorandum for a detailed                   countervailing duty determined to                                        normally adjust preliminary cash deposit rates for
                                                    discussion.                                                                                                                                  estimated domestic subsidy pass-through, where
                                                      11 See 19 CFR 351.308(c) and (d) and section                        14 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the                       appropriate. However, in this case in the
                                                    776(c) of the Act.                                                  Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional                       Preliminary Determination, we did not grant a
                                                      12 See ‘‘Continuation of Suspension of
                                                                                                                        Measures Period in Antidumping and                                       domestic subsidy pass-through adjustment. See
                                                    Liquidation’’ section below.                                        Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042                          Preliminary Decision Memorandum. We received
                                                      13 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Quantity and                     (October 3, 2011).                                                       no comments on this issues, and we have not
                                                    Value Questionnaire Recipients’’ (July 16, 2015).                     15 See section 772(c)(1)(C) of the Act.                                changed this decision for this final determination.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014       18:30 Jun 01, 2016      Jkt 238001     PO 00000      Frm 00026      Fmt 4703       Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM              02JNN1


                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 106 / Thursday, June 2, 2016 / Notices                                                  35319

                                                    Act, the ITC will determine within 45                   include coils that have a width of 12.7 mm             Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS), both of
                                                    days whether the domestic industry in                   or greater, regardless of form of coil (e.g., in       which are considered high tensile strength
                                                    the United States is materially injured,                successively superimposed layers, spirally             and high elongation steels.
                                                                                                            oscillating, etc.). The products covered also             Subject merchandise also includes
                                                    or threatened with material injury, by
                                                                                                            include products not in coils (e.g., in straight       corrosion-resistant steel that has been further
                                                    reason of imports or sales (or the                      lengths) of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and
                                                    likelihood of sales) for importation of                                                                        processed in a third country, including but
                                                                                                            a width that is 12.7 mm or greater and that
                                                    the subject merchandise. If the ITC                     measures at least 10 times the thickness. The          not limited to annealing, tempering, painting,
                                                    determines that such injury exists, the                 products covered also include products not             varnishing, trimming, cutting, punching and/
                                                    Department will issue an antidumping                    in coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a              or slitting or any other processing that would
                                                    duty order directing CBP to assess, upon                thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a width               not otherwise remove the merchandise from
                                                    further instruction by the Department,                  exceeding 150 mm and measuring at least                the scope of the investigation if performed in
                                                                                                            twice the thickness. The products described            the country of manufacture of the in-scope
                                                    antidumping duties on all imports of the
                                                                                                            above may be rectangular, square, circular, or         corrosion resistant steel.
                                                    subject merchandise entered, or                         other shape and include products of either
                                                    withdrawn from warehouse, for                                                                                     All products that meet the written physical
                                                                                                            rectangular or non-rectangular cross-section           description, and in which the chemistry
                                                    consumption on or after the effective                   where such cross-section is achieved
                                                                                                                                                                   quantities do not exceed any one of the noted
                                                    date of the suspension of liquidation.                  subsequent to the rolling process, i.e.,
                                                                                                            products which have been ‘‘worked after                element levels listed above, are within the
                                                    Notification Regarding Administrative                   rolling’’ (e.g., products which have been              scope of this investigation unless specifically
                                                    Protective Orders                                       beveled or rounded at the edges). For                  excluded. The following products are outside
                                                       In the event the ITC issues a final                  purposes of the width and thickness                    of and/or specifically excluded from the
                                                    negative injury determination, this                     requirements referenced above:                         scope of this investigation:
                                                    notice will serve as the only reminder                     (1) Where the nominal and actual                       • Flat-rolled steel products either plated or
                                                                                                            measurements vary, a product is within the             coated with tin, lead, chromium, chromium
                                                    to parties subject to an APO of their                   scope if application of either the nominal or
                                                    responsibility concerning the                                                                                  oxides, both tin and lead (terne plate), or
                                                                                                            actual measurement would place it within               both chromium and chromium oxides (tin
                                                    disposition of proprietary information                  the scope based on the definitions set forth
                                                                                                                                                                   free steel), whether or not painted, varnished
                                                    disclosed under APO in accordance                       above, and
                                                                                                               (2) where the width and thickness vary for          or coated with plastics or other non-metallic
                                                    with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
                                                                                                            a specific product (e.g., the thickness of             substances in addition to the metallic
                                                    written notification of the return or
                                                                                                            certain products with non-rectangular cross-           coating;
                                                    destruction of APO materials, or
                                                                                                            section, the width of certain products with               • Clad products in straight lengths of
                                                    conversion to judicial protective order,
                                                                                                            non-rectangular shape, etc.), the                      4.7625 mm or more in composite thickness
                                                    is hereby requested. Failure to comply                  measurement at its greatest width or                   and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and
                                                    with the regulations and terms of an                    thickness applies.                                     measures at least twice the thickness; and
                                                    APO is a violation subject to sanction.                    Steel products included in the scope of this           • Certain clad stainless flat-rolled
                                                       We are issuing and publishing this                   investigation are products in which: (1) Iron          products, which are three-layered corrosion-
                                                    determination and notice in accordance                  predominates, by weight, over each of the
                                                                                                                                                                   resistant flat-rolled steel products less than
                                                    with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the                  other contained elements; (2) the carbon
                                                                                                            content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and           4.75 mm in composite thickness that consist
                                                    Act.                                                                                                           of a flat-rolled steel product clad on both
                                                                                                            (3) none of the elements listed below exceeds
                                                      Dated: May 24, 2016.                                  the quantity, by weight, respectively                  sides with stainless steel in a 20%-60%-20%
                                                    Paul Piquado,                                           indicated:                                             ratio.
                                                    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and                 • 2.50 percent of manganese, or                           The products subject to the investigation
                                                    Compliance.                                             • 3.30 percent of silicon, or                          are currently classified in the Harmonized
                                                                                                            • 1.50 percent of copper, or                           Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
                                                    Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in                  • 1.50 percent of aluminum, or                         under item numbers: 7210.30.0030,
                                                    the Final Decision Memorandum                           • 1.25 percent of chromium, or                         7210.30.0060, 7210.41.0000, 7210.49.0030,
                                                    I. Summary                                              • 0.30 percent of cobalt, or                           7210.49.0091, 7210.49.0095, 7210.61.0000,
                                                    II. Background                                          • 0.40 percent of lead, or                             7210.69.0000, 7210.70.6030, 7210.70.6060,
                                                    III. Final Determination of Critical                    • 2.00 percent of nickel, or
                                                                                                                                                                   7210.70.6090, 7210.90.6000, 7210.90.9000,
                                                          Circumstances, in Part                            • 0.30 percent of tungsten (also called
                                                                                                               wolfram), or                                        7212.20.0000, 7212.30.1030, 7212.30.1090,
                                                    IV. Scope Comments
                                                                                                            • 0.80 percent of molybdenum, or                       7212.30.3000, 7212.30.5000, 7212.40.1000,
                                                    V. Scope of the Investigation
                                                    VI. Changes Since the Preliminary                       • 0.10 percent of niobium (also called                 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, and
                                                          Determinations                                       columbium), or                                      7212.60.0000.
                                                    VII. Use of Adverse Facts Available                     • 0.30 percent of vanadium, or                            The products subject to the investigation
                                                    VIII. Discussion of the Issues                          • 0.30 percent of zirconium                            may also enter under the following HTSUS
                                                       Comment 1: Ocean Freight Surrogate Value                Unless specifically excluded, products are          item numbers: 7210.90.1000, 7215.90.1000,
                                                       Comment 2: Byproduct Offset                          included in this scope regardless of levels of         7215.90.3000, 7215.90.5000, 7217.20.1500,
                                                       Comment 3: Hot-Rolled Steel Surrogate                boron and titanium.                                    7217.30.1530, 7217.30.1560, 7217.90.1000,
                                                          Value                                                For example, specifically included in this          7217.90.5030, 7217.90.5060, 7217.90.5090,
                                                       Comment 4: Surrogate Financial Ratios                scope are vacuum degassed, fully stabilized            7225.91.0000, 7225.92.0000, 7225.99.0090,
                                                    IX. Recommendation                                      (commonly referred to as interstitial-free (IF))
                                                                                                                                                                   7226.99.0110, 7226.99.0130, 7226.99.0180,
                                                                                                            steels and high strength low alloy (HSLA)
                                                    Appendix II—Scope of the Investigation                  steels. IF steels are recognized as low carbon         7228.60.6000, 7228.60.8000, and
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            steels with micro-alloying levels of elements          7229.90.1000.
                                                       The products covered by this investigation
                                                    are certain flat-rolled steel products, either          such as titanium and/or niobium added to                  The HTSUS subheadings above are
                                                    clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-                 stabilize carbon and nitrogen elements.                provided for convenience and customs
                                                    resistant metals such as zinc, aluminum, or             HSLA steels are recognized as steels with              purposes only. The written description of the
                                                    zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-based                 micro-alloying levels of elements such as              scope of the investigation is dispositive.
                                                    alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted,           chromium, copper, niobium, titanium,                   [FR Doc. 2016–12965 Filed 6–1–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    varnished, laminated, or coated with plastics           vanadium, and molybdenum.
                                                                                                               Furthermore, this scope also includes               BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                    or other non-metallic substances in addition
                                                    to the metallic coating. The products covered           Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS) and



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:30 Jun 01, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00027   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM   02JNN1



Document Created: 2016-06-02 01:23:08
Document Modified: 2016-06-02 01:23:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesJune 2, 2016.
ContactNancy Decker or Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0196 or (202) 482-4261, respectively.
FR Citation81 FR 35316 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR