81 FR 36488 - Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Murrells Inlet, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 109 (June 7, 2016)

Page Range		36488-36490
FR Document		2016-13323

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone in the navigable waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. This safety zone is necessary to protect the public from hazards associated with launching fireworks over navigable waters of the United States. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36488-36490]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13323]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0347]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Murrells Inlet, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
in the navigable waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the public from hazards associated with launching
fireworks over navigable waters of the United States. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0347 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

On April 22, 2016, The Marsh Walk Group notified the Coast Guard
that it will be conducting a fireworks display from 9:30 p.m. to 9:50
p.m. on July 4, 2016. The fireworks are to be launched from the end of
the Veterans Fishing Pier in Murrells Inlet, SC. Hazards from firework
displays include accidental discharge of fireworks, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or other debris. The Captain of the
Port Charleston (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated
with the fireworks to be used in this display would be a safety concern
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the pier.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

[[Page 36489]]

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 9:15 p.m. to 10
p.m. on July 4, 2016. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the Veterans pier located on the Atlantic Ocean.
The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels
and these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled 9:30
to 9:50 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Atlantic Ocean for less than 1
hour during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 1 hour that would prohibit entry within 500
yards of the Veterans Pier. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

[[Page 36490]]

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.T07-0347 under the undesignated center
heading Seventh Coast Guard District to read as follows:

Sec. 165.T07-0347 Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Murrells
Inlet, SC.

(a) This rule establishes a safety zone on all Atlantic Ocean
waters within a 500 yard radius of Veterans Pier, from which fireworks
will be launched.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2016
from 9:15 p.m. until 10 p.m.

Dated: May 31, 2016.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2016-13323 Filed 6-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

36488 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules

Institution where the inmate is ■ 7. Revise § 571.64, to read as follows: This safety zone is necessary to protect
confined. the public from hazards associated with
■ 5. In § 571.62, revise paragraph (a),
§ 571.64 Ineligible offenders. launching fireworks over navigable
paragraph (a)(2), and the second The Bureau of Prisons has no waters of the United States. This
sentence of paragraph (b), to read as authority to initiate a request under 18 proposed rulemaking would prohibit
follows: U.S.C. 4205(g) or 3582(c)(1)(A) on behalf persons and vessels from being in the
of— safety zone unless authorized by the
§ 571.62 Approval of request. (a) A state prisoner housed in a Captain of the Port Charleston or a
(a) The Bureau of Prisons makes a Bureau facility; designated representative. We invite
motion under 18 U.S.C. 4205(g) or (b) A federal offender, serving a non- your comments on this proposed
3582(c)(1)(A) only after review of the parolable sentence, who committed his rulemaking.
request by the Warden, the Office of or her offense before November 1, 1987;
General Counsel, and either the Medical or DATES: Comments and related material
Director (or Acting Medical Director) for (c) A military prisoner housed in a must be received by the Coast Guard on
medical referrals or the Assistant Bureau facility. or before June 22, 2016.
Director (or Acting Assistant Director), ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
Correctional Programs Division for non- PART 572—PAROLE identified by docket number USCG–
medical referrals, and with the approval ■ 8. The authority citation for part 572 2016–0347 using the Federal
of the Director, Bureau of Prisons. continues to read as follows: eRulemaking Portal at http://
* * * * * www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 4001,
(2) After obtaining the opinion of 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to
Participation and Request for
either the Medical Director (or Acting offenses committed on or after November 1, Comments’’ portion of the
Medical Director) or the Assistant 1987), 4205, 5015 (Repealed October 12, 1984 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
Director (or Acting Assistant Director), as to offenses committed after that date), further instructions on submitting
Correctional Programs Division, the 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28 CFR 0.95–0.99. comments.
Office of General Counsel will
Subpart E—Reduction In Sentence FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
determine if the request warrants
(Procedures for the Implementation of you have questions about this proposed
approval. The Office of General Counsel
18 U.S.C. 4205(g)) rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
will solicit the opinion of the United
John Downing, Sector Charleston Office
States Attorney in the district in which ■ 9. Revise the heading of Subpart E to of Waterways Management, Coast
the inmate was sentenced. With these read as set forth above. Guard; telephone (843) 740–3184, email
opinions, the Office of General Counsel ■ 10. Revise § 572.40 to read as follows: John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil.
shall forward the entire matter to the
Director, Bureau of Prisons, for final § 572.40 Reduction in sentence under 18 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
decision, subject to the general U.S.C. 4205(g).
I. Table of Abbreviations
supervision and direction of the 18 U.S.C. 4205(g) was repealed
Attorney General and Deputy Attorney effective November 1, 1987, but remains CFR Code of Federal Regulations
the controlling law for inmates whose DHS Department of Homeland Security
General.
FR Federal Register
* * * * * offenses occurred prior to that date. For NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
(b) * * * Upon receipt of notice that inmates whose offenses occurred on or § Section
the sentencing court has entered an after November 1, 1987, the applicable U.S.C. United States Code
order granting the motion under 18 statute is 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A).
Procedures for reduction of sentence of II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A), the Warden of the
an inmate under either provision are Basis
institution where the inmate is confined
shall release the inmate either forthwith contained in 28 CFR part 571, subpart On April 22, 2016, The Marsh Walk
or as soon as his medical condition G. Group notified the Coast Guard that it
permits and transportation can be [FR Doc. 2016–13294 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am] will be conducting a fireworks display
arranged. BILLING CODE P from 9:30 p.m. to 9:50 p.m. on July 4,
* * * * * 2016. The fireworks are to be launched
■ 6. Revise § 571.63(b) and (d), to read from the end of the Veterans Fishing
as follows: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Pier in Murrells Inlet, SC. Hazards from
SECURITY firework displays include accidental
§ 571.63 Denial of request. discharge of fireworks, dangerous
* * * * * Coast Guard projectiles, and falling hot embers or
(b) When an inmate’s request is other debris. The Captain of the Port
denied by the Office of General Counsel 33 CFR part 165 Charleston (COTP) has determined that
or the Director, the inmate will receive potential hazards associated with the
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0347]
a written notice and a statement of fireworks to be used in this display
reasons for the denial. This denial RIN 1625–AA00 would be a safety concern for anyone
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

constitutes a final administrative within a 500-yard radius of the pier.
decision. Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
Murrells Inlet, SC
* * * * * ensure the safety of vessels and the
(d) Because a denial by the Office of AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. navigable waters within a 500-yard
General Counsel or Director, Bureau of ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. radius of the fireworks barge before,
Prisons, constitutes a final during, and after the scheduled event.
administrative decision, an inmate may SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to The Coast Guard proposes this
not appeal the denial through the establish a temporary safety zone in the rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
Administrative Remedy Procedure. navigable waters of Murrells Inlet, SC. 1231.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM 07JNP1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules 36489

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
The COTP proposes to establish a with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the
safety zone from 9:15 p.m. to 10 p.m. on The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes.
July 4, 2016. The safety zone would 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has
cover all navigable waters within 500 have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
yards of the Veterans pier located on the a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
Atlantic Ocean. The duration of the While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section.
vessels and these navigable waters zone may be small entities, for the
before, during, and after the scheduled reasons stated in section IV.A above this E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
9:30 to 9:50 p.m. fireworks display. No proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
vessel or person would be permitted to of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
enter the safety zone without obtaining vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, Federal agencies to assess the effects of
permission from the COTP or a
organization, or governmental their discretionary regulatory actions. In
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity particular, the Act addresses actions
at the end of this document. and that this rule would have a that may result in the expenditure by a
significant economic impact on it, State, local, or tribal government, in the
IV. Regulatory Analyses please submit a comment (see aggregate, or by the private sector of
We developed this proposed rule after ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
considering numerous statutes and qualifies and how and to what degree more in any one year. Though this
Executive orders related to rulemaking. this rule would economically affect it. proposed rule would not result in such
Below we summarize our analyses Under section 213(a) of the Small an expenditure, we do discuss the
based on a number of these statutes and Business Regulatory Enforcement effects of this rule elsewhere in this
Executive orders and we discuss First Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), preamble.
Amendment rights of protestors. we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the F. Environment
A. Regulatory Planning and Review rule would affect your small business,
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 organization, or governmental We have analyzed this proposed rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and jurisdiction and you have questions under Department of Homeland
benefits of available regulatory concerning its provisions or options for Security Management Directive 023–01
alternatives and, if regulation is compliance, please contact the person and Commandant Instruction
necessary, to select regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
approaches that maximize net benefits. CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will Guard in complying with the National
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the not retaliate against small entities that Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
importance of quantifying both costs question or complain about this U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
and benefits, of reducing costs, of proposed rule or any policy or action of preliminary determination that this
harmonizing rules, and of promoting the Coast Guard. action is one of a category of actions that
flexibility. This NPRM has not been do not individually or cumulatively
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory C. Collection of Information
have a significant effect on the human
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule would not call for environment. This proposed rule
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been a new collection of information under involves a safety zone lasting less than
reviewed by the Office of Management the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
1 hour that would prohibit entry within
and Budget. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
500 yards of the Veterans Pier. Normally
This regulatory action determination
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal such actions are categorically excluded
is based on the size, location, duration,
Governments from further review under paragraph
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely A rule has implications for federalism 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
transit around this safety zone which under Executive Order 13132, Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
would impact a small designated area of Federalism, if it has a substantial direct environmental analysis checklist and
the Atlantic Ocean for less than 1 hour effect on the States, on the relationship Categorical Exclusion Determination are
during the evening when vessel traffic is between the national government and available in the docket where indicated
normally low. Moreover, the Coast the States, or on the distribution of under ADDRESSES. We seek any
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to power and responsibilities among the comments or information that may lead
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel various levels of government. We have to the discovery of a significant
16 about the zone, and the rule would analyzed this proposed rule under that environmental impact from this
allow vessels to seek permission to enter Order and have determined that it is proposed rule.
the zone. consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption G. Protest Activities
B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of The Coast Guard respects the First
Order 13132.
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have Amendment rights of protesters.
requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive Protesters are asked to contact the
the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal INFORMATION CONTACT section to
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have coordinate protest activities so that your
businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or message can be received without
that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship jeopardizing the safety or security of
operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and people, places, or vessels.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:45 Jun 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM 07JNP1

Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:31:25
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:31:25

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before June 22, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 36488
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 36488 - Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Murrells Inlet, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 109 (June 7, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard