81_FR_36628 81 FR 36519 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Reinstatement of Order, in Part

81 FR 36519 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Reinstatement of Order, in Part

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 109 (June 7, 2016)

Page Range36519-36521
FR Document2016-13534

On May 11, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (``the Court'') issued final judgment in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13-00168,\1\ sustaining the Department of Commerce's (``the Department'') voluntary final remand results concerning the Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination.\2\ In the Final Section 129 Remand, the Department determined that it was appropriate to reinstate the partially revoked antidumping duty order (``the order'') on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (``diamond sawblades'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') with respect to Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. (``AT&M'') \3\ where the basis for the Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination was no longer valid.\4\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36519-36521]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-900]


Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination 
Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Reinstatement 
of Order, in Part

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On May 11, 2016, the United States Court of International 
Trade (``the Court'') issued final judgment in Diamond Sawblades 
Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13-00168,\1\ 
sustaining the Department of Commerce's (``the Department'') voluntary 
final remand results concerning the Implemented PRC Section 129 
Determination.\2\ In the Final Section 129 Remand, the Department 
determined that it was appropriate to reinstate the partially revoked 
antidumping duty order (``the order'') on diamond sawblades and parts 
thereof (``diamond sawblades'') from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC'') with respect to Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd. 
(``AT&M'') \3\ where the basis for the Implemented PRC Section 129 
Determination was no longer valid.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer's Coalition v. United 
States, Consol. Court No. 13-00168, Slip Op. 16-48 (CIT May 11, 
2016) (``DSMC'').
    \2\ See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant To Diamond 
Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Consol. Court 
No. 13-00168, Slip Op. 15-92 (CIT August 20, 2015), dated December 
1, 2015, (``Final Section 129 Remand'') available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/; Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 
the People's Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and Parts 
Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of 
Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay 
Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty 
Orders, 78 FR 18958 (March 28, 2013) (``Implemented PRC Section 129 
Determination'').
    \3\ Collectively with Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Product Company 
and Yichang HXF Circular Saw Industrial Co., Ltd., a single entity. 
See Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination, 78 FR 18958, 18959 at 
n. 10.
    \4\ See Final Section 129 Remand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals 
for the

[[Page 36520]]

Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. 
Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond 
Sawblades''), the Department is notifying the public that the final 
judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's 
implemented final determination in a proceeding conducted under section 
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Section 129). Furthermore, the 
Department is reinstating the order with respect to AT&M.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Who, was stated in the Implemented PRC Section 129 
Determination was, collectively with Beijing Gang Yan Diamond 
Product Company and Yichang HXF Circular Saw Industrial Co., Ltd., a 
single entity.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Devine, AD/CVD Operations 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0238.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    In the less-than-fair-value (``LTFV'') investigation, the 
Department determined that mandatory respondent AT&M was eligible for a 
separate rate, and calculated a separate estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin for it.\6\ Petitioner, the Diamond Sawblades 
Manufacturers' Coalition (``DSMC''), challenged the Department's 
separate-rate determination in court.\7\ Concurrently, the PRC 
challenged the Department's use of its ``zeroing'' methodology in 
calculating dumping margins in certain LTFV investigations before the 
World Trade Organization's (``WTO'') Dispute Settlement Body.\8\ 
Effective March 22, 2013, in response to the dispute settlement panel's 
findings and instructions by the United States Trade Representative 
(``USTR'') to implement the Department's determination under Section 
129 of the URAA, the Department recalculated AT&M's weighted-average 
dumping margin from the LTFV investigation without the use of 
zeroing.\9\ Removing the zeroing methodology resulted in AT&M receiving 
a calculated dumping margin of zero.\10\ Consequently, the Department 
partially revoked the order with respect to AT&M. The DSMC challenged 
this determination before the Court. Additionally, in the ongoing 
litigation relating to the Department's separate-rate determination in 
the LTFV investigation, the Department reconsidered AT&M's separate 
rate eligibility and determined that AT&M had not rebutted the 
presumption of state control, and thus, was not eligible for a separate 
rate.\11\ The rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity in the LTFV 
investigation was based on information in the petition and did not 
involve zeroing.\12\ On October 11, 2013, the Court sustained the 
Department's redetermination that AT&M failed to rebut the presumption 
of state control, and therefore, was not eligible for a separate 
rate.\13\ On October 24, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (``CAFC'') affirmed the Court's decision.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination at 29306.
    \7\ See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v. United States, 
938 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (CIT 2013).
    \8\ See WTO Panel Report, United States--Anti-Dumping Measures 
on Certain Shrimp and Diamond Sawblades from China, WT/DS422/R (June 
8, 2012).
    \9\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's 
Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the 
People's Republic of China: Notice of Implementation of 
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act 
and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 18958, 
18960 (March 28, 2013).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand 
Order Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic 
of China, Advanced Tech. & Material Co. v. United States, CIT Ct. 
No. 09-511 (May 6, 2013) (``Advanced Tech. Remand'') available at 
http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/12-147.pdf.
    \12\ See Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Preliminary Partial 
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts 
Thereof from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 77121, 77129 
(December 29, 2005) unchanged in Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial Affirmative Determination of 
Critical Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the 
People's Republic of China, 71 FR 29303 (May 22, 2006).
    \13\ See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v. United States, 
938 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (CIT 2013).
    \14\ See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v. United States, 
581 Fed. Appx. 900 (CAFC 2014) (Rule 36).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In light of AT&M's ineligibility for a separate rate in the LTFV 
investigation, and the inapplicability of the separate-rate applied to 
AT&M in the LTFV investigation which served as the basis of the 
Department's Implemented PRC Section 129 determination, in the 
litigation concerning the Implemented PRC Section 129 determination, 
the United States moved for a voluntary remand to reconsider its 
partial revocation of the dumping order. The Court granted the United 
States' motion.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 13-00168, Slip op. 15-92 (August 20, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 1, 2015, the Department issued the final results of 
redetermination in this section 129 remand and filed this remand with 
the Court.\16\ On May 11, 2016, the Court entered judgment sustaining 
the remand results.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Final Section 129 Remand.
    \17\ See Final Sustained Remand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department must 
publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a 
Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries 
pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's May 11, 2016, 
judgment sustaining the Final Section 129 Remand constitutes a final 
decision of the Court that is not in harmony with the Department's 
Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination.\18\ This notice is published 
in fulfillment of the publication requirement of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See DSMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reinstatement of the Order

    In the Final Section 129 Remand, sustained by the Court,\19\ the 
Department determined that reinstatement of the order with regard to 
AT&M was appropriate.\20\ Accordingly, consistent with the Final 
Section 129 Remand and the decision by the Court sustaining that 
redetermination, the Department hereby reinstates the order as it 
applies to AT&M. Consistent with the Department's stated intention in 
the Final Section 129 Remand, this reinstatement of the order with 
regard to AT&M is effective as of March 22, 2013, which was the 
effective date of the partial revocation.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See DSMC at 5-6.
    \20\ See Final Section 129 Remand; see also DSMC.
    \21\ See Final Section 129 Remand, at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
require cash deposits at 82.05 percent, the current rate established 
for the PRC-wide entity.\22\ Pursuant to the Court's finding that the 
Department should have issued those instructions upon filing the 
redetermination with the Court, those instructions will be effective as 
of December 1, 2015, the date the remand

[[Page 36521]]

redetermination was filed with the Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 129(c)(2)(A) of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

    Dated: June 1, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-13534 Filed 6-6-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Notices                                                    36519

                                                       3. Industry Presentations.                           Administration Act, as amended, that                     Dated: June 1, 2016.
                                                       4. New Business.                                     deal with United States policies of                    Kevin J. Wolf,
                                                       Closed Session:                                      encouraging trade with all countries                   Assistant Secretary for Export
                                                       5. Discussion of matters determined to               with which the United States has                       Administration.
                                                    be exempt from the provisions relating                  diplomatic or trading relations and of                 [FR Doc. 2016–13398 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.                    controlling trade for national security                BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
                                                    app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).                        and foreign policy reasons.
                                                       The open session will be accessible
                                                    via teleconference to 20 participants on                Agenda
                                                                                                                                                                   DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                    a first come, first serve basis. To join the            Open Session
                                                    conference, submit inquiries to Ms.                                                                            International Trade Administration
                                                    Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@                     1. Opening remarks by the Chairman
                                                                                                                                                                   [A–570–900]
                                                    bis.doc.gov no later than July 19, 2016.                     and Vice Chairman.
                                                       A limited number of seats will be                    2. Presentation of papers or comments                  Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
                                                    available during the public session of                       by the Public.                                    From the People’s Republic of China:
                                                    the meeting. Reservations are not                                                                              Notice of Court Decision Not in
                                                    accepted. To the extent that time                       3. Export Control Reform Update via
                                                                                                                 Video Teleconferencing.                           Harmony With Final Determination
                                                    permits, members of the public may                                                                             Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
                                                    present oral statements to the                          4. Status of and Commentary on
                                                                                                                                                                   Round Agreements Act and
                                                    Committee. The public may submit                             Proposed Rules via Video
                                                                                                                                                                   Reinstatement of Order, in Part
                                                    written statements at any time before or                     Teleconferencing.
                                                    after the meeting. However, to facilitate               5. Update on the Single Form via Video                 AGENCY:   Enforcement and Compliance,
                                                    distribution of public presentation                          Teleconferencing.                                 International Trade Administration,
                                                    materials to the Committee members,                                                                            Department of Commerce.
                                                                                                            6. Subcommittee Updates.
                                                    the Committee suggests that the                                                                                SUMMARY: On May 11, 2016, the United
                                                    materials be forwarded before the                       Closed Session                                         States Court of International Trade (‘‘the
                                                    meeting to Ms. Springer.                                                                                       Court’’) issued final judgment in
                                                       The Assistant Secretary for                          7. Discussion of matters determined to
                                                                                                                                                                   Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’
                                                    Administration, with the concurrence of                      be exempt from the provisions
                                                                                                                                                                   Coalition v. United States, Court No.
                                                    the General Counsel, formally                                relating to public meetings found in
                                                                                                                                                                   13–00168,1 sustaining the Department
                                                    determined on November 5, 2015                               5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
                                                                                                                                                                   of Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’)
                                                    pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal                   The open session will be accessible                 voluntary final remand results
                                                    Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5                   via teleconference to 25 participants on               concerning the Implemented PRC
                                                    U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d), that the portion of              a first come, first served basis. To join              Section 129 Determination.2 In the Final
                                                    this meeting dealing with pre-decisional                the conference, submit inquiries to Ms.                Section 129 Remand, the Department
                                                    changes to the Commerce Control List                    Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@                    determined that it was appropriate to
                                                    and U.S. export control policies shall be               bis.doc.gov no later than June 15, 2016.               reinstate the partially revoked
                                                    exempt from the provisions relating to                     A limited number of seats will be                   antidumping duty order (‘‘the order’’)
                                                    public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app.                  available for the public session.                      on diamond sawblades and parts thereof
                                                    2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining               Reservations are not accepted. To the                  (‘‘diamond sawblades’’) from the
                                                    portions of the meeting will be open to                 extent that time permits, members of the               People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
                                                    the public.                                             public may present oral statements to                  with respect to Advanced Technology &
                                                       For more information contact Yvette                  the Committee. The public may submit                   Materials Co., Ltd. (‘‘AT&M’’) 3 where
                                                    Springer on (202) 482–2813.                             written statements at any time before or               the basis for the Implemented PRC
                                                      Dated: June 2, 2016.                                  after the meeting. However, to facilitate              Section 129 Determination was no
                                                    Yvette Springer,                                        the distribution of public presentation                longer valid.4
                                                                                                            materials to the Committee members,                       Consistent with the decision of the
                                                    Committee Liaison Officer.
                                                                                                            the Committee suggests that presenters                 United States Court of Appeals for the
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–13402 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            forward the public presentation
                                                    BILLING CODE P                                                                                                    1 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer’s
                                                                                                            materials prior to the meeting to Ms.
                                                                                                                                                                   Coalition v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13–
                                                                                                            Springer via email.                                    00168, Slip Op. 16–48 (CIT May 11, 2016)
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                     The Assistant Secretary for                         (‘‘DSMC’’).
                                                                                                            Administration, with the concurrence of                   2 See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant

                                                    Bureau of Industry and Security                         the delegate of the General Counsel,                   To Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v.
                                                                                                                                                                   United States, Consol. Court No. 13–00168, Slip
                                                                                                            formally determined on March 9, 2016,                  Op. 15–92 (CIT August 20, 2015), dated December
                                                    President’s Export Council                              pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal               1, 2015, (‘‘Final Section 129 Remand’’) available at
                                                    Subcommittee on Export                                  Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5                  http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/; Certain
                                                    Administration; Notice of Partially                     U.S.C. app. 2 § (10)(d)), that the portion             Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s
                                                    Closed Meeting                                                                                                 Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and
                                                                                                            of the meeting dealing with pre-                       Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China:
                                                      The President’s Export Council                        decisional changes to the Commerce                     Notice of Implementation of Determinations Under
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Subcommittee on Export                                  Control List and U.S. export control                   Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
                                                                                                            policies shall be exempt from the                      and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty
                                                    Administration (PECSEA) will meet on                                                                           Orders, 78 FR 18958 (March 28, 2013)
                                                    June 22, 2016, 9:15 a.m. (Pacific                       provisions relating to public meetings                 (‘‘Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination’’).
                                                    Daylight Time), at Dorsey & Whitney                     found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and                  3 Collectively with Beijing Gang Yan Diamond

                                                    LLP, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100,                      10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the                Product Company and Yichang HXF Circular Saw
                                                                                                            meeting will be open to the public.                    Industrial Co., Ltd., a single entity. See
                                                    Seattle, WA 98104. The PECSEA                                                                                  Implemented PRC Section 129 Determination, 78
                                                    provides advice on matters pertinent to                    For more information, call Yvette                   FR 18958, 18959 at n. 10.
                                                    those portions of the Export                            Springer at (202) 482–2813.                               4 See Final Section 129 Remand.




                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:13 Jun 06, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00004   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM   07JNN1


                                                    36520                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Notices

                                                    Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co.                the zeroing methodology resulted in                       On December 1, 2015, the Department
                                                    v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.               AT&M receiving a calculated dumping                    issued the final results of
                                                    1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by                     margin of zero.10 Consequently, the                    redetermination in this section 129
                                                    Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.                    Department partially revoked the order                 remand and filed this remand with the
                                                    United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir.                 with respect to AT&M. The DSMC                         Court.16 On May 11, 2016, the Court
                                                    2010) (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the                      challenged this determination before the               entered judgment sustaining the remand
                                                    Department is notifying the public that                 Court. Additionally, in the ongoing                    results.17
                                                    the final judgment in this case is not in               litigation relating to the Department’s
                                                    harmony with the Department’s                           separate-rate determination in the LTFV                Timken Notice
                                                    implemented final determination in a                    investigation, the Department                             In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at
                                                    proceeding conducted under section                      reconsidered AT&M’s separate rate                      341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,
                                                    129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements                     eligibility and determined that AT&M
                                                                                                                                                                   the CAFC held that, pursuant to section
                                                    Act (Section 129). Furthermore, the                     had not rebutted the presumption of
                                                                                                                                                                   516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                    Department is reinstating the order with                state control, and thus, was not eligible
                                                                                                                                                                   amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department
                                                    respect to AT&M.5                                       for a separate rate.11 The rate applicable
                                                                                                                                                                   must publish a notice of a court
                                                    DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2016.                    to the PRC-wide entity in the LTFV
                                                                                                                                                                   decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        investigation was based on information
                                                                                                                                                                   a Department determination and must
                                                    Andrew Devine, AD/CVD Operations                        in the petition and did not involve
                                                                                                                                                                   suspend liquidation of entries pending
                                                    Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,                   zeroing.12 On October 11, 2013, the
                                                                                                                                                                   a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
                                                    International Trade Administration,                     Court sustained the Department’s
                                                                                                                                                                   Court’s May 11, 2016, judgment
                                                    U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th                       redetermination that AT&M failed to
                                                                                                                                                                   sustaining the Final Section 129
                                                    Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,                     rebut the presumption of state control,
                                                                                                                                                                   Remand constitutes a final decision of
                                                    Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)                  and therefore, was not eligible for a
                                                                                                            separate rate.13 On October 24, 2014, the              the Court that is not in harmony with
                                                    482–0238.                                                                                                      the Department’s Implemented PRC
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
                                                                                                            (‘‘CAFC’’) affirmed the Court’s                        Section 129 Determination.18 This
                                                    Background                                              decision.14                                            notice is published in fulfillment of the
                                                                                                               In light of AT&M’s ineligibility for a              publication requirement of Timken.
                                                       In the less-than-fair-value (‘‘LTFV’’)
                                                    investigation, the Department                           separate rate in the LTFV investigation,               Reinstatement of the Order
                                                    determined that mandatory respondent                    and the inapplicability of the separate-
                                                    AT&M was eligible for a separate rate,                  rate applied to AT&M in the LTFV                         In the Final Section 129 Remand,
                                                    and calculated a separate estimated                     investigation which served as the basis                sustained by the Court,19 the
                                                    weighted-average dumping margin for                     of the Department’s Implemented PRC                    Department determined that
                                                    it.6 Petitioner, the Diamond Sawblades                  Section 129 determination, in the                      reinstatement of the order with regard to
                                                    Manufacturers’ Coalition (‘‘DSMC’’),                    litigation concerning the Implemented                  AT&M was appropriate.20 Accordingly,
                                                    challenged the Department’s separate-                   PRC Section 129 determination, the                     consistent with the Final Section 129
                                                    rate determination in court.7                           United States moved for a voluntary                    Remand and the decision by the Court
                                                    Concurrently, the PRC challenged the                    remand to reconsider its partial                       sustaining that redetermination, the
                                                    Department’s use of its ‘‘zeroing’’                     revocation of the dumping order. The                   Department hereby reinstates the order
                                                    methodology in calculating dumping                      Court granted the United States’                       as it applies to AT&M. Consistent with
                                                    margins in certain LTFV investigations                  motion.15                                              the Department’s stated intention in the
                                                    before the World Trade Organization’s                                                                          Final Section 129 Remand, this
                                                    (‘‘WTO’’) Dispute Settlement Body.8                     Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay        reinstatement of the order with regard to
                                                                                                            Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of
                                                    Effective March 22, 2013, in response to                the Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 18958, 18960
                                                                                                                                                                   AT&M is effective as of March 22, 2013,
                                                    the dispute settlement panel’s findings                 (March 28, 2013).                                      which was the effective date of the
                                                    and instructions by the United States                     10 Id.                                               partial revocation.21
                                                    Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) to                        11 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant

                                                                                                            to Remand Order Diamond Sawblades and Parts            Cash Deposit Requirements
                                                    implement the Department’s
                                                                                                            Thereof from the People’s Republic of China,
                                                    determination under Section 129 of the                  Advanced Tech. & Material Co. v. United States,           The Department will instruct U.S.
                                                    URAA, the Department recalculated                       CIT Ct. No. 09–511 (May 6, 2013) (‘‘Advanced Tech.     Customs and Border Protection to
                                                    AT&M’s weighted-average dumping                         Remand’’) available at http://                         require cash deposits at 82.05 percent,
                                                    margin from the LTFV investigation                      enforcement.trade.gov/remands/12-147.pdf.
                                                                                                              12 See Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less    the current rate established for the PRC-
                                                    without the use of zeroing.9 Removing                   Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final                 wide entity.22 Pursuant to the Court’s
                                                                                                            Determination, and Preliminary Partial                 finding that the Department should have
                                                       5 Who, was stated in the Implemented PRC
                                                                                                            Determination of Critical Circumstances: Diamond       issued those instructions upon filing the
                                                    Section 129 Determination was, collectively with        Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
                                                    Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Product Company and            Republic of China, 70 FR 77121, 77129 (December
                                                                                                                                                                   redetermination with the Court, those
                                                    Yichang HXF Circular Saw Industrial Co., Ltd., a        29, 2005) unchanged in Final Determination of          instructions will be effective as of
                                                    single entity.                                          Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Partial        December 1, 2015, the date the remand
                                                       6 See Implemented PRC Section 129                    Affirmative Determination of Critical
                                                    Determination at 29306.                                 Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                     16 See  Final Section 129 Remand.
                                                       7 See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v.         Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 71 FR
                                                                                                                                                                     17 See  Final Sustained Remand.
                                                    United States, 938 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (CIT 2013).         29303 (May 22, 2006).
                                                                                                              13 See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v.           18 See DSMC.
                                                       8 See WTO Panel Report, United States—Anti-
                                                                                                                                                                      19 See DSMC at 5–6.
                                                    Dumping Measures on Certain Shrimp and                  United States, 938 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (CIT 2013).
                                                                                                                                                                      20 See Final Section 129 Remand; see also DSMC.
                                                    Diamond Sawblades from China, WT/DS422/R                  14 See Advanced Technology & Materials Co. v.

                                                    (June 8, 2012).                                         United States, 581 Fed. Appx. 900 (CAFC 2014)             21 See Final Section 129 Remand, at 6.
                                                       9 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the       (Rule 36).                                                22 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof

                                                    People’s Republic of China and Diamond                    15 See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers               from the People’s Republic of China; Final Results
                                                    Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s           Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13–00168, Slip   of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
                                                    Republic of China: Notice of Implementation of          op. 15–92 (August 20, 2015).                           2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015).



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:13 Jun 06, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM   07JNN1


                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Notices                                            36521

                                                    redetermination was filed with the                      This information will help create better               DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
                                                    Court.                                                  rip current products used by the
                                                                                                            National Weather Service (NWS) to                      National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                                    Notification to Interested Parties                                                                             Administration
                                                                                                            protect lives and prevent injury from rip
                                                      This notice is issued and published in                currents.                                              RIN 0648–XE663
                                                    accordance with sections 516A(e) and
                                                    777(i)(1) of the Act and section                        II. Method of Collection
                                                                                                                                                                   Marine Mammals; File No. 18769
                                                    129(c)(2)(A) of the Uruguay Round                         The primary data collection vehicles
                                                    Agreements Act.                                         will be an internet-based, public survey               AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries
                                                      Dated: June 1, 2016.                                  and face to face focus groups. The focus               Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
                                                    Paul Piquado,                                           groups will target lifeguards and                      Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
                                                                                                            decision makers. Telephone and                         Commerce.
                                                    Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
                                                    Compliance.                                             personal interviews may be employed to                 ACTION: Notice; receipt of application.
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–13534 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]              supplement and verify survey
                                                                                                                                                                   SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that
                                                    BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P                                  responses.
                                                                                                                                                                   Sea World, LLC., 9205 South Park
                                                                                                            III. Data                                              Center Loop, Suite 400, Orlando, FL
                                                                                                                                                                   32819 [Christopher Dold, D.V.M.,
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                     OMB Control Number: 0648–xxxx.                      Responsible Party], has applied in due
                                                                                                               Form Number(s): None.                               form for a permit to continue
                                                    National Oceanic and Atmospheric
                                                    Administration                                             Type of Review: Regular submission                  enhancement activities on three
                                                                                                            (request for a new information                         currently held non-releasable
                                                    Proposed Information Collection;                        collection).                                           Guadalupe fur seals (Arctocephalus
                                                    Comment Request; Rip Current                               Affected Public: Members of the                     townsendi) with the option of holding
                                                    Visualization Survey and Focus                          public.                                                up to six non-releasable furs seals at any
                                                    Groups                                                     Estimated Number of Respondents:                    given time.
                                                                                                            500 for the survey and 80 for the focus                DATES: Written, telefaxed, or email
                                                    AGENCY: National Oceanic and
                                                    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                      groups.                                                comments must be received on or before
                                                    Commerce.                                                  Estimated Time per Response: 30                     July 7, 2016.
                                                    ACTION: Notice.                                         minutes for the survey and 1.5 hours for               ADDRESSES: The application and related
                                                                                                            the focus groups.                                      documents are available for review by
                                                    SUMMARY:    The Department of                              Estimated Total Annual Burden                       selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public
                                                    Commerce, as part of its continuing                     Hours: 250 hours for the survey and 120                Comment’’ from the ‘‘Features’’ box on
                                                    effort to reduce paperwork and                          hours for the focus groups.                            the Applications and Permits for
                                                    respondent burden, invites the general                     Estimated Total Annual Cost to                      Protected Species (APPS) home page,
                                                    public and other Federal agencies to                    Public: $0 in recordkeeping/reporting                  https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov, and then
                                                    take this opportunity to comment on                     costs.                                                 selecting File No. 18769 from the list of
                                                    proposed and/or continuing information                                                                         available applications.
                                                    collections, as required by the                         IV. Request for Comments                                  These documents are also available
                                                    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                           Comments are invited on: (a) Whether                upon written request or by appointment
                                                    DATES: Written comments must be                         the proposed collection of information                 in the Permits and Conservation
                                                    submitted on or before August 8, 2016.                  is necessary for the proper performance                Division, Office of Protected Resources,
                                                    ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments                  of the functions of the agency, including              NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
                                                    to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental                        whether the information shall have                     13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
                                                    Paperwork Clearance Officer,                            practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the             (301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
                                                    Department of Commerce, Room 6616,                                                                                Written comments on this application
                                                                                                            agency’s estimate of the burden
                                                    14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,                                                                              should be submitted to the Chief,
                                                                                                            (including hours and cost) of the
                                                    Washington, DC 20230 (or via the                                                                               Permits and Conservation Division, at
                                                                                                            proposed collection of information; (c)
                                                    Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).                                                                                  the address listed above. Comments may
                                                                                                            ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                   also be submitted by facsimile to (301)
                                                                                                            clarity of the information to be
                                                    Requests for additional information or                                                                         713–0376, or by email to
                                                                                                            collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
                                                    copies of the information collection                                                                           NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Please
                                                                                                            burden of the collection of information
                                                    instrument and instructions should be                                                                          include the File No. 18769 in the subject
                                                                                                            on respondents, including through the
                                                    directed to Nicole Kurkowski, National                                                                         line of the email comment.
                                                                                                            use of automated collection techniques
                                                    Weather Service, ((301) 427–9104),                                                                                Those individuals requesting a public
                                                                                                            or other forms of information
                                                    nicole.kurkowski@noaa.gov.                                                                                     hearing should submit a written request
                                                                                                            technology.
                                                                                                                                                                   to the Chief, Permits and Conservation
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                 Comments submitted in response to                   Division at the address listed above. The
                                                    I. Abstract                                             this notice will be summarized and/or                  request should set forth the specific
                                                                                                            included in the request for OMB                        reasons why a hearing on this
                                                       This is a request for a new collection
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            approval of this information collection;               application would be appropriate.
                                                    of information. The objective of the                    they also will become a matter of public
                                                    survey and focus groups is to collect                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                            record.
                                                    information on the current use and                                                                             Jennifer Skidmore and Amy Sloan, (301)
                                                    knowledge of NOAA’s National Weather                      Dated: June 2, 2016.                                 427–8401.
                                                    Service (NWS) products and                              Sarah Brabson,                                         SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
                                                    perceptions of various rip current                      NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.                            subject permit is requested under the
                                                    products. The focus groups will ask                     [FR Doc. 2016–13368 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]             authority of the Marine Mammal
                                                    participants to explain their responses.                BILLING CODE 3510–KE–P                                 Protection Act of 1972, as amended


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:13 Jun 06, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00006   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM   07JNN1



Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:31:32
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:31:32
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective Date: May 21, 2016.
ContactAndrew Devine, AD/CVD Operations Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0238.
FR Citation81 FR 36519 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR