81 FR 38673 - Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 114 (June 14, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 114 (June 14, 2016)
| Page Range | 38673-38675 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14047 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 38673-38675] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14047] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-900] Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013- 2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 4, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof (diamond sawblades) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014. For the final results, we continue to find that certain companies covered by this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2016 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482- 3683, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 4, 2015, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results. As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the final results of this review moved to April 8, 2016.\2\ Subsequently, we fully extended the time for completing the final results of this administrative review to June 7, 2016.\3\ At the request of interested parties, we held a hearing on April 20, 2016. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 75854 (December 4, 2015) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum for the Record from Acting Assistant Secretary Ron Lorenzen entitled ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm `Jonas''' dated January 27, 2016. \3\ See Memorandum to Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman entitled ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated March 23, 2016, and Memorandum to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh entitled ``Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Full Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' dated May 18, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is diamond sawblades. The diamond sawblades subject to the order are currently classifiable under subheadings 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and may also enter under 6804.21.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\ The written description is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China'' dated June 7, 2016, (Issues and Decision Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this notice, at 4-5. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Final Determination of No Shipments We preliminarily found that Danyang City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd., which have been eligible for separate rates in previous segments of the proceeding and are subject to this review, did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\5\ After the Preliminary Results, [[Page 38674]] we received no comments or additional information with respect to these six companies. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that these six companies did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on our final results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Affiliation and Single Entity Determination For the final results, we continue to find that Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Sawing Co., Ltd., are affiliated, pursuant to sections 771(33)(A) and (F) of the Act. Additionally, under 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1)-(2), we continue to find that these companies should be considered a single entity (collectively known as the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity).\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-6 for more details. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we made revisions that have changed the results for certain companies, including the valuation of certain factors of production and the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, we made calculation programming changes for the final results. For further details on the changes we made for these final results, see the company-specific analysis memoranda, the Issues and Decision Memorandum, and the final surrogate value memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice. Moreover, on May 11, 2016, in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13- 00168, the Court of International Trade affirmed a remand redetermination in which the Department determined it appropriate to reinstate the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC, in part, with respect to certain parts of the ATM Single Entity for which the Department previously had revoked the order, in part.\7\ Accordingly, the Department reinstated the order on diamond sawblades from the PRC, in part, with respect to these companies.\8\ As a result, all companies that the Department has found to constitute the ATM Single Entity are subject to this administrative review.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The ATM Single Entity is comprised of Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd., AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Co., Cliff International Ltd., and HXF Saw Co., Ltd. Concerning partial revocation of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades from the PRC, see Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the People's Republic of China and Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Implementation of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 18958 (March 28, 2013); Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer's Coalition v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00168, Slip Op. 16-48 (CIT May 11, 2016). \8\ See Diamond Sawblades And Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Reinstatement of Order, In Part, 81 FR 36519 (June 7, 2016). \9\ Id. To the extent they do not demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate and no party has requested a review of the PRC-wide entity, there is no conditional review of the PRC-wide entity. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), and Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 75854. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Bosun Tools Co., Ltd........................................ 29.76 Chengdu Huifeng Diamond Tools Co., Ltd...................... 29.76 Danyang Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd....... 29.76 Danyang NYCL Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd................... 29.76 Danyang Weiwang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd................ 29.76 Guilin Tebon Superhard Material Co., Ltd.................... 29.76 Hangzhou Deer King Industrial and Trading Co., Ltd.......... 29.76 Hong Kong Hao Xin International Group Limited............... 29.76 Huzhou Gu's Import & Export Co., Ltd........................ 29.76 Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity \10\.......................... 61.48 Jiangsu Huachang Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd............... 29.76 Jiangsu Inter-China Group Corporation \11\.................. 29.76 Jiangsu Youhe Tool Manufacturer Co., Ltd.................... 29.76 Orient Gain International Limited........................... 29.76 Pantos Logistics (HK) Company Limited....................... 29.76 Qingyuan Shangtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.................... 29.76 Quanzhou Zhongzhi Diamond Tool Co., Ltd..................... 29.76 Rizhao Hein Saw Co., Ltd.................................... 29.76 Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.................. 29.76 Shanghai Jingquan Industrial Trade Co., Ltd................. 29.76 Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd............ 21.67 Wuhan Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co........................ 29.76 Xiamen ZL Diamond Technology Co., Ltd....................... 29.76 Zhejiang Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd......................... 29.76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\12\ For customers or importers of the Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity and Weihai Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co., Ltd. (Weihai) for which we do not have entered values, we calculated customer-/importer-specific antidumping duty assessment amounts based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping duties calculated for the examined sales of subject merchandise to the total sales quantity of those same sales.\13\ For a customer or importer of Weihai for which we received entered-value information, we have calculated a customer/importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rate based on customer-/importer-specific ad valorem rates in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ For the final results, we continue to treat Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacture Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengtai Tools Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Sawing Co., Ltd., as a single entity. See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 75854-55, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4-6 for details. \11\ See Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 75855 n.15 for the name variation of this company. \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \13\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For all non-selected respondents that received a separate rate, we will instruct CBP to apply an antidumping duty assessment rate of 29.76 percent \14\ to all entries of subject merchandise that entered the United States during the POR. For all other companies, with the exception of the ATM Single Entity, we will instruct CBP to apply the antidumping duty assessment rate of the PRC-wide entity, 82.05 percent, to all entries of subject merchandise exported by these companies.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 5-6. \15\ See Initiation Notice, 79 FR at 76957 (``All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or certification, as described below.''). Companies that are subject to this administrative review that are considered to be part of the PRC-wide entity are Central Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group, Danyang Aurui Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Danyang Dida Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Electrolux Construction Products (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd., Hebei Jikai Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Huachang Diamond Tools Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hua Da Superabrasive Tools Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengyu Tools Co., Ltd., Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd., Protech Diamond Tools, Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Shuangyang Diamond Tools Co., Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd., Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Task Tools & Abrasives, Wanli Tools Group, Wuxi Lianhua Superhard Material Tools Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Tea Import & Export Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Wanda Import and Export Co., Zhejiang Wanda Tools Group Corp., and Zhejiang Wanli Super-hard Materials Co., Ltd. Additionally, the ATM Single Entity (i.e., Advanced Technology & Materials Co., Ltd., AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Co., Cliff International Ltd., and HXF Saw Co., Ltd.) is part of the PRC-wide entity. See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 7 and 8 for more information concerning the ATM Single Entity as part of the PRC-wide entity and the effect of the Department's remand redetermination in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer's Coalition v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-00168, Slip Op. 16-48 (CIT May 11, 2016), which implicates entries of diamond sawblades from the PRC from the ATM Single Entity. A preliminary injunction issued by the Court of International Trade in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13-00168, currently enjoins us from lifting suspension of liquidation for entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by the ATM Single Entity to the extent that such entries were made on or after March 22, 2013. See CBP Message Number 5238306 dated August 26, 2015, which is available at http://adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/ad_cvd_msgs/20287. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 38675]] For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by an exporter individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for the six companies that we determined had no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise in this review period, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results of review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: June 7, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix Summary Background Company Abbreviations Other Abbreviations Diamond Sawblades Administrative Determinations and Results Scope of the Order Surrogate Country Separate Rates Differential Pricing ATM Single Entity Discussion of the Issues Respondent Selection Value-Added Tax Differential Pricing Surrogate Values Billing Adjustments Reconstruction of Control Numbers Rescission of Review in Part Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-14047 Filed 6-13-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices 38673
proceeding but which have separate results of the administrative review of of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue the antidumping duty order on diamond (the Act).
to be the exporter-specific rate sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
Scope of the Order
published for the most recent period; (3) sawblades) from the People’s Republic
for all PRC exporters of subject of China (the PRC). The period of review The merchandise subject to the order
merchandise that have not been found (POR) is November 1, 2013, through is diamond sawblades. The diamond
to be entitled to a separate rate the cash October 31, 2014. For the final results, sawblades subject to the order are
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate we continue to find that certain currently classifiable under subheadings
of 247.26 percent; and (4) for all non- companies covered by this review made 8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
PRC exporters of subject merchandise sales of subject merchandise at less than Schedule of the United States (HTSUS),
which have not received their own rate, normal value. and may also enter under 6804.21.00.
the cash deposit rate will be the rate DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2016 The HTSUS subheadings are provided
applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that for convenience and customs purposes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These A full description of the scope of the
deposit requirements, when imposed, Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/ order is contained in the Issues and
shall remain in effect until further CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Decision Memorandum.4 The written
notice. and Compliance, International Trade description is dispositive.
Administration, U.S. Department of
Notification to Importers Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue Analysis of Comments Received
This notice also serves as a NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: All issues raised in the case and
preliminary reminder to importers of (202) 482–5760 and (202) 482–3683, rebuttal briefs by parties to this
their responsibility under 19 CFR respectively. administrative review are addressed in
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
regarding the reimbursement of A list of the issues raised is attached to
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Background this notice as an appendix. The Issues
of the relevant entries during this On December 4, 2015, the Department and Decision Memorandum is a public
review period. Failure to comply with published the preliminary results of the document and is on file electronically
this requirement could result in the administrative review of the via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Department’s presumption that antidumping duty order on diamond Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
reimbursement of antidumping duties sawblades from the PRC.1 We received Centralized Electronic Service System
occurred and the subsequent assessment case and rebuttal briefs with respect to (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is
of double antidumping duties. We are the Preliminary Results. As explained in available to registered users at http://
issuing and publishing these results in the memorandum from the Acting access.trade.gov. The Issues and
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Decision Memorandum is also available
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Compliance, the Department exercised to all parties in the Central Records
Dated: June 7, 2016. its discretion to toll all administrative Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Paul Piquado, deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Department of Commerce building. In
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Government. All deadlines in this addition, a complete version of the
Compliance. segment of the proceeding have been Issues and Decision Memorandum can
extended by four business days. The be accessed directly on the Enforcement
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in and Compliance Web site at http://
revised deadline for the final results of
the Preliminary Results Decision enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
this review moved to April 8, 2016.2
Memorandum
Subsequently, we fully extended the Final Determination of No Shipments
Summary time for completing the final results of
Background this administrative review to June 7, We preliminarily found that Danyang
Scope of the Order 2016.3 At the request of interested City Ou Di Ma Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang
Discussion of the Methodology Tsunda Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
parties, we held a hearing on April 20,
Recommendation 2016. We conducted this administrative Hangzhou Kingburg Import & Export
review in accordance with section 751 Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hyosung Diamond
[FR Doc. 2016–14048 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
Tools Co., Ltd., Qingdao Shinhan
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 1 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., and
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Shanghai Starcraft Tools Co., Ltd.,
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative which have been eligible for separate
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 75854 (December 4,
2015) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
rates in previous segments of the
International Trade Administration Preliminary Decision Memorandum. proceeding and are subject to this
2 See Memorandum for the Record from Acting review, did not have any reviewable
[A–570–900] Assistant Secretary Ron Lorenzen entitled ‘‘Tolling entries of subject merchandise during
of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the the POR.5 After the Preliminary Results,
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas’’’
From the People’s Republic of China: dated January 27, 2016.
3 See Memorandum to Associate Deputy Assistant 4 See Memorandum from Deputy Assistant
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Secretary Gary Taverman entitled ‘‘Diamond Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Review; 2013–2014 Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s Paul Piquado entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Antidumping Duty Order on Diamond Sawblades
International Trade Administration, Review’’ dated March 23, 2016, and Memorandum and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
Department of Commerce. to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh China’’ dated June 7, 2016, (Issues and Decision
entitled ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this notice,
SUMMARY: On December 4, 2015, the at 4–5.
from the People’s Republic of China: Full Extension
Department of Commerce (the of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 5 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Department) published the preliminary Administrative Review’’ dated May 18, 2016. Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jun 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_38787/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices 38675
For entries that were not reported in that received a separate rate in a prior Differential Pricing
the U.S. sales databases submitted by an segment of this proceeding, the cash Surrogate Values
exporter individually examined during deposit rate will continue to be the Billing Adjustments
this review, the Department will Reconstruction of Control Numbers
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC
Rescission of Review in Part
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at exporters of subject merchandise that Recommendation
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, for the have not been found to be entitled to a
six companies that we determined had [FR Doc. 2016–14047 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
no reviewable entries of the subject be that for the PRC-wide entity; (4) for BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
merchandise in this review period, any all non-PRC exporters of subject
suspended entries that entered under merchandise which have not received
that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the be the rate applicable to the PRC National Oceanic and Atmospheric
PRC-wide rate. exporter that supplied that non-PRC Administration
We intend to issue assessment exporter. These deposit requirements
instructions to CBP 15 days after the shall remain in effect until further RIN 0648–XD776
date of publication of the final results of notice.
review. Endangered Species; File No. 19281
Notification to Importers
Cash Deposit Requirements AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
This notice serves as a final reminder Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
The following cash deposit to importers of their responsibility Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
requirements will be effective upon under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Commerce.
publication of these final results of certificate regarding the reimbursement
review for all shipments of the subject ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit.
of antidumping duties prior to
merchandise from the PRC entered, or liquidation of the relevant entries SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr.
withdrawn from warehouse, for during this review period. Failure to Isaac Wirgin, New York University
consumption on or after the publication comply with this requirement could School of Medicine, Department of
date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) result in the Secretary’s presumption Environmental Medicine, 57 Old Forge
of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise that reimbursement of the antidumping Road, Tuxedo, NY 10987, has been
exported by the companies listed above duties occurred and the subsequent issued a permit to import and take early
that have separate rates, the cash assessment of double antidumping life stages of endangered, captive
deposit rate will be the rate established duties. shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser
in these final results of review for each brevirostrum) for purposes of scientific
exporter as listed above; (2) for Administrative Protective Orders
research.
previously investigated or reviewed PRC This notice also serves as the only ADDRESSES: The permit and related
and non-PRC exporters not listed above reminder to parties subject to documents are available for review
administrative protective order (APO) of upon written request or by appointment
Products (Xiamen) Co., Ltd., Fujian Quanzhou their responsibility concerning the
Wanlong Stone Co., Ltd., Hebei Jikai Industrial in the Permits and Conservation
Group Co., Ltd., Huachang Diamond Tools return or destruction of proprietary Division, Office of Protected Resources,
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hua Da Superabrasive information disclosed under APO in NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
Tools Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Fengyu Tools accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
Co., Ltd., Jiangyin Likn Industry Co., Ltd., Protech Timely written notification of the return
Diamond Tools, Pujiang Talent Diamond Tools Co., (301) 427–8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
Ltd., Quanzhou Shuangyang Diamond Tools Co., or destruction of APO materials or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ltd., Shanghai Deda Industry & Trading Co., Ltd., conversion to judicial protective order is
Malcolm Mohead or Rosa L. González,
Shanghai Robtol Tool Manufacturing Co., Ltd., hereby requested. Failure to comply
Shijiazhuang Global New Century Tools Co., Ltd., (301) 427–8401.
with the regulations and terms of an
Sichuan Huili Tools Co., Task Tools & Abrasives, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May
Wanli Tools Group, Wuxi Lianhua Superhard APO is a sanctionable violation.
Material Tools Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Tea Import & These final results of review are 18, 2015, notice was published in the
Export Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Wanda Import and Export issued and published in accordance Federal Register (80 FR 28236) of a
Co., Zhejiang Wanda Tools Group Corp., and with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the request for a permit to import and
Zhejiang Wanli Super-hard Materials Co., Ltd. conduct research on shortnose sturgeon
Additionally, the ATM Single Entity (i.e., Advanced Act.
Technology & Materials Co., Ltd., AT&M early life stages had been submitted by
Dated: June 7, 2016.
International Trading Co., Ltd., Beijing Gang Yan the above-named applicant. The
Diamond Products Co., Cliff International Ltd., and Paul Piquado, requested permit has been issued under
HXF Saw Co., Ltd.) is part of the PRC-wide entity. Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and the authority of the Endangered Species
See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 7 and 8 Compliance.
for more information concerning the ATM Single Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16
Entity as part of the PRC-wide entity and the effect Appendix U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the regulations
of the Department’s remand redetermination in governing the taking, importing, and
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturer’s Coalition v. Summary
Background exporting of endangered and threatened
United States, Consol. Court No. 13–00168, Slip
Op. 16–48 (CIT May 11, 2016), which implicates Company Abbreviations species (50 CFR parts 222–226).
entries of diamond sawblades from the PRC from Other Abbreviations In directed studies with endangered
the ATM Single Entity. A preliminary injunction Diamond Sawblades Administrative shortnose sturgeon early life stages,
issued by the Court of International Trade in Determinations and Results researchers will define the toxicities of
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition v. Scope of the Order
United States, Court No. 13–00168, currently
varying concentrations of industrial
Surrogate Country contaminants, such as polychlorinated
enjoins us from lifting suspension of liquidation for
Separate Rates
entries of subject merchandise produced and/or
Differential Pricing
biphenyl (PCB) and Dioxin (2,3,7,8-
exported by the ATM Single Entity to the extent TCDD). Shortnose sturgeon fertilized
that such entries were made on or after March 22, ATM Single Entity
2013. See CBP Message Number 5238306 dated Discussion of the Issues embryos are authorized to be imported
August 26, 2015, which is available at http:// Respondent Selection by CITES I permit from the Acadian
adcvd.cbp.dhs.gov/adcvdweb/ad_cvd_msgs/20287. Value-Added Tax Sturgeon and Caviar, Inc., New
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jun 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_38787/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-14 02:58:33
Document Modified: 2016-06-14 02:58:33
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Yang Jin Chun or Bryan Hansen, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5760 and (202) 482- 3683, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 38673 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR