81 FR 39743 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Clearing Rules
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 117 (June 17, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 117 (June 17, 2016)
| Page Range | 39743-39745 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14314 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 39743-39745] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14314] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-78055; File No. SR-ICC-2016-008] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise the ICC Clearing Rules June 13, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on June 3, 2016, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by ICC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and to approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The purpose of proposed rule change is to revise the ICC Clearing Rules (``ICC Rules'') to add explicit references to certain risk- related policies currently contained in the ICC Risk Management Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description document. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change ICC proposes changes to ICC Rules 403 and 801 to add explicit references to certain risk-related policies currently contained in the ICC Risk Management Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description document related to the minimum time horizon for liquidation, anti-procyclicality conditions, and the maintenance of cover-2 default resources. The proposed changes are described in detail as follows. As provided in the ICC Risk Management Model Description document, ICC's initial margin methodology applies a minimum of a 5-day time horizon as the liquidation period for all ICC cleared instruments. ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 403 to explicitly reference this risk policy by stating that ICC's initial margin methodology shall incorporate a minimum 5-day time horizon for the liquidation period (for both house and client-related positions). Additionally, as provided in the ICC Risk Management Framework, ICC incorporates certain anti-procyclicality measures into its risk methodology to account for stable but prudent margin requirements.\3\ ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 403 to explicitly reference its current anti-procyclicality measures and to provide for additional anti- procyclicality measures. Specifically, ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 403 to state that ICC's initial margin methodology shall incorporate one or more measures designed to limit procyclicality, including by avoiding when possible disruptive or big step changes in margin requirements and by establishing transparent and predictable procedures for adjusting margin requirements in response to changing market conditions. Further, consistent with current ICC risk policies, the measures designed to limit procyclicality will demonstrably meet or exceed the requirements of measures designed to limit procyclicality that assign at least 25% weight to stressed observations in a look-back period beginning on April 1, 2007. In addition, changes to ICC Rule 403 also allow ICC to measure procyclicality limits by reference to a ten year historical look-back period for computing initial margin.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73877 (December 18, 2014) (SR-ICC-2014-18). \4\ Please note that as ICC uses a look-back period beginning on April 1, 2007, this ten year historical period anti-procyclicality measure will become available to ICC in 2017. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, as provided in the ICC Risk Management Framework, ICC maintains a minimum of cover-2 default resources, in accordance with Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') Regulations 39.11 and 39.33. ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 801(a)(i) to explicitly reference this risk policy and state that ICC shall establish the aggregate amount of required [[Page 39744]] contributions to the Guaranty Fund such that at a minimum ICC will maintain pre-funded financial resources sufficient to enable it to meet its financial obligations to Clearing Participants (``CPs'') notwithstanding a default by the two CPs (including any of their affiliated CPs) creating the largest combined loss to ICC in extreme but plausible market conditions. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \5\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions and to comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. ICC believes that the proposed changes are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to ICC, in particular, to Section 17A(b)(3)(F),\6\ because ICC believes that the proposed changes will promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions. The proposed changes to the ICC Rules to add explicit references to certain risk-related policies currently contained in the ICC Risk Management Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description document provide additional clarity and transparency regarding ICC's risk management policies and procedures. As such, the proposed rule changes are designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions, derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) \7\ of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). \6\ Id. \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition ICC does not believe the proposed revision would have any impact, or impose any burden, on competition. ICC is restating certain risk- related policies in the ICC Rules and not making any substantive changes to its overall risk management framework. Therefore, ICC does not believe the proposed revision imposes any burden on competition that is inappropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written comments received by ICC. III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-ICC-2016-008 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2016-008. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICC and on ICC's Web site at https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2016-008 and should be submitted on or before July 8, 2016. IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \8\ directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \9\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a registered clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C). \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission finds that the proposed revision to the ICC Risk Management Framework and the ICC Risk Management Model Description are consistent with the requirements of the Act, in particular the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,\10\ because the proposed changes provide additional clarity and transparency regarding ICC's risk management policies and procedures. The Commission finds that the proposed rule change promotes the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, and to comply with the provisions of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Id. In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ICC has requested that the Commission approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis for good cause shown pursuant to Section 19(b)(2). ICC is restating certain risk-related policies in the ICC Rules and not making any substantive changes to its overall risk management framework. In addition, ICC states that the changes are proposed in furtherance of regulatory compliance with European [[Page 39745]] Commission's implementing decision \11\ on the equivalence of the regulatory framework of the United States of America for central counterparties (``CCPs'') that are authorized and supervised by the CFTC to the requirements of European Market Infrastructure Regulation (``EMIR'') No. 648/2012.\12\ ICC represents that it has submitted an application to the European Securities and Markets Authority to be recognized as a third country CCP in accordance with EMIR; the proposed changes will facilitate this application process and promote regulatory compliance with the required equivalency elements. For the above reasons, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the Act,\13\ for approving the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See European Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/ 377, dated 15 March 2016. \12\ See Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, dated 4 July 2012. \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2016-008) be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis. For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-14314 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Notices 39743
companies and preparers routinely use SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE document related to the minimum time
tools the Commission makes available to COMMISSION horizon for liquidation, anti-
submit test filings to help identify and procyclicality conditions, and the
[Release No. 34–78055; File No. SR–ICC–
correct technical errors prior to EDGAR maintenance of cover-2 default
2016–008]
filing. Similar tools to submit test filings resources. The proposed changes are
will be available to those filers choosing Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE described in detail as follows.
to file in Inline XBRL. Because we Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing and As provided in the ICC Risk
expect that Inline XBRL filers would Order Granting Accelerated Approval Management Model Description
utilize available tools to submit test of Proposed Rule Change To Revise document, ICC’s initial margin
filings to identify and correct any the ICC Clearing Rules methodology applies a minimum of a 5-
technical errors prior to EDGAR filing, day time horizon as the liquidation
we believe that such suspensions June 13, 2016. period for all ICC cleared instruments.
should be similarly rare for Inline XBRL Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 403 to
filers. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 explicitly reference this risk policy by
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 stating that ICC’s initial margin
III. Conclusion notice is hereby given that on June 3, methodology shall incorporate a
Based on the foregoing, we find it is 2016, ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed minimum 5-day time horizon for the
appropriate in the public interest and with the Securities and Exchange liquidation period (for both house and
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the client-related positions).
consistent with the protection of
proposed rule change as described in Additionally, as provided in the ICC
investors to grant companies that choose
Items I, II and III below, which Items Risk Management Framework, ICC
to use Inline XBRL when filing financial incorporates certain anti-procyclicality
statements in their Exchange Act have been prepared primarily by ICC.
The Commission is publishing this measures into its risk methodology to
periodic and current reports a time- account for stable but prudent margin
limited and conditional exemption from notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested requirements.3 ICC proposes amending
certain requirements of the Interactive ICC Rule 403 to explicitly reference its
Data File exhibit. persons and to approve the proposed
rule change on an accelerated basis. current anti-procyclicality measures and
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered to provide for additional anti-
pursuant to Section 36(a) of the I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s procyclicality measures. Specifically,
Exchange Act that any company that Statement of the Terms of Substance of ICC proposes amending ICC Rule 403 to
complies with each of the conditions the Proposed Rule Change state that ICC’s initial margin
below is exempt from the requirement The purpose of proposed rule change methodology shall incorporate one or
to submit an instance document as is to revise the ICC Clearing Rules (‘‘ICC more measures designed to limit
described in this order as part of its Rules’’) to add explicit references to procyclicality, including by avoiding
Interactive Data File exhibit with Forms certain risk-related policies currently when possible disruptive or big step
6–K, 8–K, 10–Q, 10–K, 20–F and 40–F contained in the ICC Risk Management changes in margin requirements and by
for reports due before March 30, 2020. Framework and the ICC Risk establishing transparent and predictable
Management Model Description procedures for adjusting margin
Conditions
document. requirements in response to changing
The company must market conditions. Further, consistent
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s with current ICC risk policies, the
(a) file an Inline XBRL document as Statement of the Purpose of, and measures designed to limit
prescribed in the EDGAR Filer Manual; Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule procyclicality will demonstrably meet
(b) file the Interactive Data File as Change or exceed the requirements of measures
prescribed in the EDGAR Filer Manual In its filing with the Commission, ICC designed to limit procyclicality that
for Inline XBRL filers as an exhibit to included statements concerning the assign at least 25% weight to stressed
the Inline XBRL document; purpose of and basis for the proposed observations in a look-back period
(c) use XBRL tags within the Inline rule change and discussed any beginning on April 1, 2007. In addition,
XBRL document that reflect the same comments it received on the proposed changes to ICC Rule 403 also allow ICC
information in the corresponding data rule change. The text of these statements to measure procyclicality limits by
as the HTML format part of the official may be examined at the places specified reference to a ten year historical look-
filing; in Item IV below. ICC has prepared back period for computing initial
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, margin.4
(d) state in the exhibit index item Finally, as provided in the ICC Risk
referencing the Interactive Data File that and C below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements. Management Framework, ICC maintains
the instance document does not appear a minimum of cover-2 default resources,
in the Interactive Data File because its A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s in accordance with Commodity Futures
XBRL tags are embedded within the Statement of the Purpose of, and Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’)
Inline XBRL document; Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Regulations 39.11 and 39.33. ICC
(e) not file in plain text ASCII; and Change proposes amending ICC Rule 801(a)(i) to
(f) not rely on the hardship ICC proposes changes to ICC Rules explicitly reference this risk policy and
state that ICC shall establish the
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
exemptions in Rules 201 and 202 of 403 and 801 to add explicit references
Regulation S–T. to certain risk-related policies currently aggregate amount of required
contained in the ICC Risk Management
By the Commission. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
Framework and the ICC Risk
Brent J. Fields, 73877 (December 18, 2014) (SR–ICC–2014–18).
Management Model Description 4 Please note that as ICC uses a look-back period
Secretary.
beginning on April 1, 2007, this ten year historical
[FR Doc. 2016–14306 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). period anti-procyclicality measure will become
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. available to ICC in 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Jun 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_39860/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Notices 39745
Commission’s implementing decision 11 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on
on the equivalence of the regulatory to section IO(a) of the Federal Advisory behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public
framework of the United States of Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), of final agency actions subject to 23
America for central counterparties SBA announces the meetings of the U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking
(‘‘CCPs’’) that are authorized and National SBDC Advisory Board. This judicial review of the Federal agency
supervised by the CFTC to the Board provides advice and counsel to actions on the highway project will be
requirements of European Market the SBA Administrator and Associate barred unless the claim is filed on or
Infrastructure Regulation (‘‘EMIR’’) No. Administrator for Small Business before November 14, 2016. If the Federal
648/2012.12 ICC represents that it has Development Centers. law that authorizes judicial review of a
submitted an application to the The purpose of these meetings is to claim provides a time period of less
European Securities and Markets discuss following issues pertaining to than 150 days for filing such claim, then
Authority to be recognized as a third the SBDC Advisory Board: that shorter time period still applies.
country CCP in accordance with EMIR; SBA Update Annual FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
the proposed changes will facilitate this Meetings Board Caltrans: James Shankel, Senior
application process and promote Assignments Environmental Planner, California
regulatory compliance with the required Member Roundtable Department of Transportation District 8,
equivalency elements. For the above FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Division of Environmental Planning,
reasons, the Commission finds good meeting is open to the public however 464 West 4th Street, 6th Floor, MS 827,
cause, pursuant to Section advance notice of attendance is San Bernardino, California, 92401–1400,
19(b)(2)(C)(iii) of the Act,13 for requested. Anyone wishing to be a during normal business hours from 8:00
approving the proposed rule change on listening participant must contact a.m. to 5:00 p.m., telephone (909) 383–
an accelerated basis. Monika Nixon by fax or email. Her 6379, or email James.Shankel@
contact information is Monika Nixon, dot.ca.gov.
V. Conclusion Program Specialist, 409 Third Street
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
It is therefore ordered pursuant to SW., Washington, DC 20416, Phone,
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act that the 202–205–7310, Fax 202–481–5624,
email, monika.nixon@sba.gov. Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2016–
Additionally, if you need the California Department of
008) be, and hereby is, approved on an
accommodations because of a disability Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,
accelerated basis.
or require additional information, please environmental responsibilities for this
For the Commission by the Division of project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
contact Monika Nixon at the
information above. Notice is hereby given that the Caltrans
authority.14 and USFWS have taken final agency
Robert W. Errett, Miguel L’ Heureux, actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by
Deputy Secretary. White House Liaison. issuing licenses, permits, and approvals
[FR Doc. 2016–14314 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2016–14263 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] for the following highway project in the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P BILLING CODE 8025–01–P State of California: Construction of an
eastbound truck-climbing lane and
westbound truck-descending lane, and
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION construction of 10-foot inside and 12-
foot outside shoulders in both
National Small Business Development Federal Highway Administration directions—on a portion of State Route
Center Advisory Board Meeting 60 (SR–60) located in unincorporated
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions Riverside County, between Gilman
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business on Proposed Highway in California Springs Road at Post Mile (PM) 22.10
Administration (SBA).
AGENCY: Federal Highway and PM 26.61, which is approximately
ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory
Administration (FHWA), DOT. 1.369 miles west of Jack Rabbit Trail.
Committee meetings. The total length of the project is 4.51
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice for Judicial Review of Actions by the miles. The purpose of the SR–60 Truck
to announce the location, date, time and California Department of Transportation Lanes Project is to improve operational
agenda for the 4th quarter meetings of (Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327, performance, improve safety, and
the National Small Business and the United States Fish and Wildlife improve traffic flow on the regional
Development Center (SBDC) Advisory Service (USFWS). transportation system. The nearest
Board. incorporated cities are Moreno Valley,
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of located adjacent to the west side of
DATES: The meetings for the 4th quarter
Caltrans, is issuing this notice to Gilman Spring Road and Beaumont,
will be held on the following dates: announce actions taken by Caltrans, and located approximately one mile east of
Tuesday, July 19,2016 at 1:00 p.m. EST, USFWS, that are final within the the eastern limits of this project.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:00 p.m. meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The The actions by the Federal agencies,
EST Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at actions relate to a proposed highway and the laws under which such actions
1:00 p.m. EST. project, on State Route 60 (SR–60) were taken, are described in the
ADDRESSES: These meetings will be held between Gilman Springs Road at Post Environmental Assessment (EA) with a
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
via conference call. Mile (PM) 22.10 and PM 26.61, located Finding of No Significant Impact
approximately 1.369 miles west of Jack (FONSI) for the project, approved on
11 See European Commission Implementing
Rabbit Trail, in a portion of May 16, 2016, and in other documents
Decision (EU) 2016/377, dated 15 March 2016.
12 See Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, dated 4 July unincorporated Riverside County, State in the project records. The EA/FONSI,
2012. of California. Those actions grant and other project records are available
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C)(iii). licenses, permits, and approvals for the by contacting Caltrans at the address
14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). project. provided above. The Caltrans EA and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:48 Jun 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM 17JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_39860/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-17 01:05:21
Document Modified: 2016-06-17 01:05:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 39743 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR