81 FR 39908 - Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 118 (June 20, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 118 (June 20, 2016)
| Page Range | 39908-39910 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14425 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 39908-39910] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14425] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-809] Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 8, 2015, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the period November 1, 2013, through October 31, 2014.\1\ The review covers three producers/exporters of the subject merchandise: Husteel Co., Ltd. (Husteel), Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO), and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH). For these final results, we continue to find that Husteel and HYSCO sold subject merchandise at below normal value. We also determine that SeAH did not make sales of subject merchandise at below normal value. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 76267 (December 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Shuler, Jennifer Meek, or Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1293, (202) 482-2778, or (202) 482-1779, respectively. Background Following the Preliminary Results, the Department sent a supplemental questionnaire to SeAH and received a timely response.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Letter to SeAH, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welding Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Supplemental Questionnaire,'' (December 18, 2015); see also Letter from SeAH, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea for the 2013-2014 Review Period--Response to December 18 Supplemental Questionnaire,'' (December 28, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 4 and January 20, 2016, the Department extended the briefing schedule.\3\ On April 5, 2016, the [[Page 39909]] Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review by 60 days, from April 12, 2016 to June 10, 2016, as permitted by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum to the File, ``Extension of the Briefing Schedule,'' (January 4, 2016) and Memorandum to all interested parties, ``Second Extension of the Briefing Schedule,'' (January 20, 2016); we also extended the deadline to submit rebuttal briefs. See memorandum to all interested parties, ``Extension of the Deadline to submit Rebuttal Briefs,'' (February 5, 2016). \4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations entitled ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' (April 5, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 7, 2016, Husteel and HYSCO both requested a hearing. These requests were subsequently withdrawn.\5\ On February 3, 2016, we received case briefs from JMC Steel Group (JMC) and Allied Tube and Conduit (Allied) (the petitioners), Husteel, HYSCO, and SeAH.\6\ On February 12, 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioners, SeAH, and HYSCO.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Letter from Hyundai Steel Company, ``Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Request for Public Hearing,'' (January 7, 2016); see also Letter from Husteel, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, Case No. A-580-809: Request for Hearing,'' (January 7, 2016); and the withdrawal requests, see See Letter from Hyundai Steel Company, ``Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Withdrawal of Request for Hearing,'' (February 22, 2016); see also Letter from Husteel, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, 11/1/2014-10/31/2014 Administrative Review, Case No. A-580-809: Withdrawal of Request for Hearing,'' (February 19, 2016). \6\ See Case Brief of the Petitioners, ``Circular Welded Non- Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Case Brief,'' (February 3, 2016); see also Case Brief of Husteel, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea, Case No. A-580-809: Case Brief,'' (February 3, 2016); Case Brief of HYSCO, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Case Brief,'' (February 3, 2016); Case Brief of SeAH, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea for the 2013-2014 Review Period-- Case Brief,'' (February 3, 2016). \7\ See Rebuttal Brief of the petitioners, ``Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief,'' (February 12, 2016), and see Rebuttal Brief from Hundai HYSCO, ``Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Rebuttal Brief,'' (February 12, 2016); see also Rebuttal Brief from SeAH, ``Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea for the 2013-2014 Review Period--Rebuttal Brief,'' (February 12, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is circular welded non-alloy steel pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.30.10.00, 7306.30.50.25, 7306.30.50.32, 7306.30.50.40, 7306.30.50.55, 7306.30.50.85, and 7306.30.50.90. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 2013-2014,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), and which is hereby adopted by this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the parties' briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes From the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested parties, we have made certain changes for SeAH since the Preliminary Results. For home market sales that SeAH identified as consignment sales, in accordance with the Department's practice, we have used the date the customer withdrew the merchandise from consignment inventory as the appropriate date of sale. For all remaining sales we continue to follow our practice as described in the Preliminary Results. Additionally, we have recalculated inventory carrying costs for direct shipment CEP sales based on the inventory period from factory production to shipment to the U.S. customer.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ For a discussion of these changes, see the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 7 and SeAH's Final Determination Calculation Memorandum dated concurrently with this Federal Register notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer/Exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Husteel Co., Ltd............................................ 1.42 Hyundai HYSCO............................................... 1.62 SeAH Steel Corporation...................................... 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties to these proceedings within five days of the date of publication of this notice pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) and (C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. For assessment purposes, Husteel, HYSCO, and SeAH reported the name of the importer of record and the entered value for all of their sales to the United States during the period of review (POR). Accordingly, for each respondent, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Husteel, HYSCO, and SeAH which they did not know were destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate [[Page 39910]] unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company or companies involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Husteel, HYSCO, and SeAH will be equal to the respective weighted- average dumping margins established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review, but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.80 percent, the ``all others'' rate established pursuant to a court decision.\9\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3, 1995). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These final results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 10, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Issues Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Changes Since the Preliminary Results List of Comments Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether the Cohen's d Test Measures ``Targeted'' or Masked Dumping Comment 2: Whether the Ratio Test Is Arbitrary and Whether the ``Meaningful Difference Requirement'' Was Satisfied Comment 3: Whether Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method Is Permitted in Administrative Reviews Comment 4: Whether the Mixed Methodology Leads to Zeroing Comment 5: The Appropriate Universe of HYSCO's Home Market Sales Comment 6: Whether Certain HYSCO Sales Are Outside the Ordinary Course of Trade Comment 7: SeAH's Reported Credit Expense for Back-to-Back U.S. Sales Comment 8: Whether To Use SeAH's Reported Nominal Outside Diameter Comment 9: Husteel's Cost Reallocation Comment 10: HYSCO's Cost Reallocation Comment 11: SeAH's Cost Reallocation Comment 12: Whether To Assign HYSCO's Cash Deposit Rate to Hyundai Steel Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-14425 Filed 6-17-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![39908 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 / Notices
for consumption on or after the this notice in accordance with sections DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
publication date of this notice in the 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Federal Register, as provided by section Dated: June 13, 2016.
International Trade Administration
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the [A–580–809]
Paul Piquado,
exporters listed above, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate listed for each Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
exporter in the table in the ‘‘Final From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results’’ section of this notice; (2) for Appendix—Issues and Decision Results of Antidumping Duty
previously investigated PRC and non- Memorandum Administrative Review; 2013–2014
PRC exporters that received a separate
Summary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
rate in a prior segment of this Background
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will International Trade Administration,
Scope of the Order Department of Commerce.
continue to be the existing exporter-
specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of Discussion of the Issues SUMMARY: On December 8, 2015, the
subject merchandise that have not been Comment 1: Surrogate Country Department of Commerce (the
found to be entitled to a separate rate, Comment 2: Conversion of the Market Department) published the Preliminary
the cash deposit rate will be the rate Economy Price for Wafers Results of its administrative review of
previously established for the PRC-wide Comment 3: Valuation of ‘‘Unclassified the antidumping duty order on circular
entity (i.e., 238.95 percent); 22 and (4) for Stores’’ of Polysilicon welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
all non-PRC exporters of subject Comment 4: Valuation of Brokerage and the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the
Handling in Doing Business in Thailand period November 1, 2013, through
merchandise which have not received
Comment 5: Whether the Department should
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will October 31, 2014.1 The review covers
adjust the brokerage and handling SV
be the rate applicable to the PRC used for Trina in the Preliminary Results three producers/exporters of the subject
exporter that supplied that non-PRC Comment 6: Calculation of Surrogate Labor merchandise: Husteel Co., Ltd.
exporter. These deposit requirements, Value (Husteel), Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO),
when imposed, shall remain in effect Comment 7: Surrogate Value for Aluminum and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH).
until further notice. Angle Keys For these final results, we continue to
Comment 8: Surrogate Value for Aluminum find that Husteel and HYSCO sold
Notification to Importers Regarding the Frames subject merchandise at below normal
Reimbursement of Duties Comment 9: Differential Pricing value. We also determine that SeAH did
This notice also serves as a final Comment 10: Valuing Tempered Glass not make sales of subject merchandise at
reminder to importers of their Comment 11: Surrogate Value for Junction
below normal value.
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Boxes
Comment 12: Financial Statements DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2016.
to file a certificate regarding the
Comment 13: Surrogate Value for Semi- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
reimbursement of antidumping duties finished Polysilicon Ingots and Blocks Joseph Shuler, Jennifer Meek, or Lana
prior to liquidation of the relevant Comment 14: Surrogate Value for Backsheets Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
entries during this POR. Failure to Comment 15: World Cup Sponsorship Enforcement and Compliance,
comply with this requirement could Comment 16: Data Source to use to Value International Trade Administration,
result in the Department’s presumption Polysilicon and Wafers U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
that reimbursement of antidumping Comment 17: Calculation of Scrap for Waste
Cells and Modules
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
duties has occurred and the subsequent
Comment 18: Whether the Department Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
assessment of double antidumping
applied the correct surrogate value to 482–1293, (202) 482–2778, or (202) 482–
duties.
Trina’s silver paste 1779, respectively.
Administrative Protective Order Comment 19: Whether the Department
Background
(‘‘APO’’) should apply partial AFA to Trina’s
unreported factors of production for Following the Preliminary Results, the
This notice also serves as a reminder purchased solar cells Department sent a supplemental
to parties subject to APO of their Comment 20: Whether the Department questionnaire to SeAH and received a
responsibility concerning the return or erroneously valued certain overhead timely response.2
destruction of proprietary information items as direct materials On January 4 and January 20, 2016,
disclosed under APO in accordance Comment 21: Whether the Department the Department extended the briefing
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues applied the correct surrogate value to schedule.3 On April 5, 2016, the
to govern business proprietary nitrogen
information in this segment of the Comment 22: Whether the Department 1 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From
proceeding. Timely written notification should not include import data with zero the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and
of the return or destruction of APO quantities in the average unit SV Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
calculation Administrative Review; 2013–2014, 80 FR 76267
materials, or conversion to judicial Comment 23: Whether the Department (December 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results) and
protective order, is hereby requested. should revise the SV for brokerage and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Failure to comply with the regulations handling 2 See Letter to SeAH, ‘‘Antidumping Duty
and terms of an APO is a violation Comment 24: Whether the Department Administrative Review of Circular Welding Non-
Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
which is subject to sanction. should revise Trina’s credit expenses
Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ (December 18, 2015);
We are issuing these final results of and inventory carrying costs see also Letter from SeAH, ‘‘Administrative Review
administrative review and publishing Comment 25: Whether the Department of the Antidumping Order on Circular Welded Non-
should revise Trina’s warranty expenses Alloy Steel Pipe from Korea for the 2013–2014
22 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, when calculating CEP Review Period—Response to December 18
Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the Comment 26: Whether the Department Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ (December 28, 2015).
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of should revise Trina’s insurance expenses 3 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Extension of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Briefing Schedule,’’ (January 4, 2016) and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2012–2013, [FR Doc. 2016–14532 Filed 6–17–16; 8:45 am] Memorandum to all interested parties, ‘‘Second
80 FR 40998, 41002 (July 14, 2015). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Extension of the Briefing Schedule,’’ (January 20,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Jun 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40026/page/1.svg)
![39910 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 / Notices
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate Notification Regarding Administrative DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
if there is no rate for the intermediate Protective Order
company or companies involved in the International Trade Administration
transaction. For a full discussion of this This notice also serves as a reminder
[A–570–038]
clarification, see Antidumping and to parties subject to administrative
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: protective order (APO) of their Certain Amorphous Silica Fabric From
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 responsibility concerning the the People’s Republic of China:
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). disposition of proprietary information Postponement of Preliminary
disclosed under APO in accordance Determination of the Less-Than-Fair-
Cash Deposit Requirements with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which Value Investigation
The following cash deposit continues to govern business
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
requirements will be effective upon proprietary information in this segment
International Trade Administration,
publication of the notice of final results of the proceeding. Timely written Department of Commerce.
of administrative review for all notification of the return or destruction
DATES: Effective Date: June 20, 2016.
shipments of subject merchandise of APO materials, or conversion to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
entered or withdrawn from warehouse, judicial protective order, is hereby
Scott Hoefke at (202) 482–4947 or Mike
for consumption, on or after the date of requested. Failure to comply with the
Heaney at (202) 482–4475, AD/CVD
publication, as provided by section regulations and the terms of an APO is Operations, Enforcement and
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash a sanctionable violation. Compliance, International Trade
deposit rate for Husteel, HYSCO, and Administration, Department of
Notification to Interested Parties
SeAH will be equal to the respective Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
weighted-average dumping margins These final results of administrative Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
established in the final results of this review are issued and published in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
review; (2) for merchandise exported by accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
manufacturers or exporters not covered Background
777(i)(1) of the Act.
in this review, but covered in a prior On February 16, 2016, the Department
segment of the proceeding, the cash Dated: June 10, 2016.
of Commerce (the Department) initiated
deposit rate will continue to be the Paul Piquado, an antidumping duty investigation on
company-specific rate published for the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and certain amorphous silica fabric from the
most recently completed segment of this Compliance. People’s Republic of China.1 The notice
proceeding in which that manufacturer of initiation stated that the Department,
or exporter participated; (3) if the Appendix—List of Issues Discussed in
in accordance with section 733(b)(1)(A)
exporter is not a firm covered in this the Issues and Decision Memorandum
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
review, a prior review, or the original Summary (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1),
investigation but the manufacturer is, Background would issue its preliminary
the cash deposit rate will be the rate Changes Since the Preliminary Results determination for this investigation,
established for the most recently List of Comments unless postponed, no later than 140
completed segment of this proceeding Scope of the Order days after the date of the initiation. The
for the manufacturer of subject Discussion of the Issues deadline for the preliminary
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit Comment 1: Whether the Cohen’s d Test determination of this antidumping duty
rate for all other manufacturers or Measures ‘‘Targeted’’ or Masked investigation is currently July 5, 2016.
exporters will continue to be 4.80 Dumping
percent, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established Comment 2: Whether the Ratio Test Is
Postponement of the Preliminary
pursuant to a court decision.9 These Arbitrary and Whether the ‘‘Meaningful Determination
cash deposit requirements, when Difference Requirement’’ Was Satisfied Section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act
imposed, shall remain in effect until Comment 3: Whether Consideration of an permits the Department to postpone the
further notice. Alternative Comparison Method Is time limit for the preliminary
Permitted in Administrative Reviews determination if it receives a timely
Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 4: Whether the Mixed request from the petitioner for
Reimbursement of Duties Methodology Leads to Zeroing postponement. The Department may
This notice serves as a final reminder
Comment 5: The Appropriate Universe of postpone the preliminary determination
HYSCO’s Home Market Sales under section 733(c)(1) of the Act until
to importers of their responsibility
Comment 6: Whether Certain HYSCO Sales no later than 190 days after the date on
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
Are Outside the Ordinary Course of which the Department initiates an
certificate regarding the reimbursement Trade
of antidumping duties prior to investigation.
Comment 7: SeAH’s Reported Credit On June 1, 2016, Auburn
liquidation of the relevant entries Expense for Back-to-Back U.S. Sales Manufacturing, Inc. (the Petitioner)
during this review period. Failure to Comment 8: Whether To Use SeAH’s submitted a timely request pursuant to
comply with this requirement could Reported Nominal Outside Diameter section 733(c)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
result in the Department’s presumption Comment 9: Husteel’s Cost Reallocation 351.205(e) for a 50-day postponement of
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
that reimbursement of antidumping Comment 10: HYSCO’s Cost Reallocation the preliminary determination in this
duties occurred and the subsequent Comment 11: SeAH’s Cost Reallocation investigation.2 The petitioner stated that
assessment of doubled antidumping Comment 12: Whether To Assign HYSCO’s
duties. Cash Deposit Rate to Hyundai Steel 1 See Certain Amorphous Silica Fabric from the
Recommendation People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-
9 See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Fair-Value Investigation, 81 FR 8913 (February 23,
[FR Doc. 2016–14425 Filed 6–17–16; 8:45 am]
Korea: Notice of Final Court Decision and Amended 2016).
Final Determination, 60 FR 55833 (November 3, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 2 See Letter from Petitioner, ‘‘Certain Amorphous
1995). Silica Fabric from the People’s Republic of China:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Jun 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40026/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-06-18 00:09:32
Document Modified: 2016-06-18 00:09:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Joseph Shuler, Jennifer Meek, or Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-1293, (202) 482-2778, or (202) 482-1779, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 39908 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR