81_FR_40467 81 FR 40348 - Certain Graphics Processing Chips, Systems on a Chip, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

81 FR 40348 - Certain Graphics Processing Chips, Systems on a Chip, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 119 (June 21, 2016)

Page Range40348-40350
FR Document2016-14657

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40348-40350]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-941]


Certain Graphics Processing Chips, Systems on a Chip, and 
Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Grant a Joint 
Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement 
Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

[[Page 40349]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the 
above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Traud, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-3427. Copies of non-confidential 
documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be 
available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 
5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal at (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on December 30, 2014, based on a complaint filed by Samsung Electronics 
Co., Ltd. of Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea, and Samsung Austin 
Semiconductor, LLC of Austin, Texas (collectively, Complainants). 79 FR 
78477-78 (Dec. 30, 2014). The complaint alleges violations of section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain graphics 
processing chips (GPUs), systems on a chip (SoCs), and products 
containing the same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 
1-4, 6, and 19-21 of U.S. Patent No. 6,147,385 (the '385 patent); claim 
10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,173,349 (the '349 patent); claims 1, 2, 4, 19, 
20, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 7,056,776 (the '776 patent); and claims 
1-3, 7-9, 12-15, 17, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 7,804,734 (the '734 
patent). Id. The notice of investigation named as respondents NVIDIA 
Corporation (NVIDIA) of Santa Clara, California; Biostar Microtech 
International Corp. of New Taipei, Taiwan; Biostar Microtech U.S.A. 
Corp. of City of Industry, California; Elitegroup Computer Systems Co. 
Ltd. of Taipei, Taiwan; Elitegroup Computer Systems, Inc. of Newark, 
California; EVGA Corp. of Brea, California; Fuhu, Inc. of El Segundo, 
California; Jaton Corp. of Fremont, California; Mad Catz, Inc. of San 
Diego, California; OUYA, Inc. of Santa Monica, California; Sparkle 
Computer Co., Ltd. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Toradex, Inc. of 
Seattle, Washington; Wikipad, Inc. of Westlake Village, California; 
ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd of New Territories, Hong Kong; and ZOTAC 
USA, Inc. of Chino, California (collectively, Respondents). Id. The 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) is also a party to this 
investigation. Id.
    On May 1, 2015, the Commission determined not to review an initial 
determination terminating the investigation as to respondent Wikipad, 
Inc. Notice of Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation as to Respondent Wikipad, 
Inc. Based on a Consent Order Stipulation, Consent Order, and 
Settlement Agreement; Issuance of Consent Order (May 1, 2015) 
(determining not to review Order No. 6 (Apr. 1, 2015)). On July 1, 
2015, the Commission determined not to review an initial determination 
terminating the investigation with respect to the '776 patent. Notice 
of Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation with Respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,056,776 
(July 1, 2015) (determining not to review Order No. 9 (June 9, 2015)). 
On August 13, 2015, the Commission determined not to review an initial 
determination finding that the economic prong of the domestic industry 
requirement has been satisfied. Notice of a Commission Determination 
Not to Review an Initial Determination That the Economic Prong of the 
Domestic Industry Requirement Has Been Satisfied (Aug. 13, 2015) 
(determining not review Order No. 12 (July 16, 2015)). On September 17, 
2015, the Commission determined not to review (1) an initial 
determination terminating the investigation as to claims 19-21 of the 
'385 patent and claims 7-9, 12-15, 17, and 19 of the '734 patent; and 
(2) an initial determination terminating the investigation as to 
respondent ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd. Notice of Commission Decision 
Not to Review Two Initial Determinations That Terminated the 
Investigation as to Certain Asserted Patent Claims and as to One 
Respondent (Sept. 17, 2015) (determining not to review Order No. 23 
(Aug. 26, 2015) and Order No. 25 (Aug. 26, 2015)).
    The following claims remained at issue for consideration by the 
ALJ: Claims 1-4 and 6 of the '385 patent; claim 10 of the '349 patent; 
and claims 1 and 3 of the '734 patent. On December 22, 2015, the ALJ 
issued his final ID, which found a violation of all three remaining 
patents. See ID at 1. On January 5, 2016, the ALJ issued his 
recommended determination on remedy and bond (RD), which recommended 
the issuance of a limited exclusion order covering all of the 
infringing articles imported, sold for importation, or sold after 
importation by the remaining respondents. RD at 9. The RD also 
recommended the issuance of cease and desist orders to certain domestic 
respondents. Id. at 14. The RD additionally set a bond in the amount of 
4% of the average value of the accused GPUs and SoCs. Id. at 17.
    The remaining respondents and OUII filed petitions for review, and 
OUII, and Complainants filed responses to the petitions. On February 
24, 2016, the Commission determined to review some of the petitioned 
issues. 81 FR 10654 (Mar. 1, 2016). On March 7, 2016, the parties filed 
written submissions on the issues under review, remedy, the public 
interest, and bonding. On March 14, 2016, the parties filed reply 
submissions. No submissions were received from the public.
    On April 29, 2016, and prior to the Commission's final 
determination, the private parties indicated that they had reached a 
settlement agreement. On May 16, 2016, the private parties filed a 
joint motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of that 
settlement pursuant to Commission Rule Sec.  210.21(b). An amended 
version of the joint motion (the Corrected Joint Motion) was filed on 
May 19, 2016. The motion to terminate is based on a Memorandum of 
Understanding Regarding Settlement Agreement (MOU), a binding agreement 
between Samsung Electronics and NVIDIA. The Corrected Joint Motion 
declares that the MOU ``completely resolves the disputes between all 
parties with respect to the asserted patents,'' that there are ``no 
other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between them 
concerning the subject matter of this investigation,'' and that ``it is 
in the interest of the public and administrative economy to grant this 
motion.'' Corrected Joint Mtn. at 2. The Corrected Joint Motion 
includes confidential and public versions of the MOU. On May 26, 2016, 
OUII filed a submission supporting the termination of the 
investigation. No other party filed a response to the Corrected Joint 
Motion.
    The Commission has determined that the Corrected Joint Motion 
complies with the requirements of section 210.21(b)(1) of the 
Commission's Rules

[[Page 40350]]

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and that there are no 
extraordinary circumstances that would prevent the requested 
termination. The Commission also finds that granting the Corrected 
Joint Motion would not be contrary to the public interest pursuant to 
section 210.50(b)(2) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)). Accordingly, the Commission hereby 
grants the Corrected Joint Motion. This investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 16, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-14657 Filed 6-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                    40348                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices

                                                    marked as to whether they are the                       INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                    ’599 patent’’). Id. The notice of
                                                    ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’                COMMISSION                                             investigation names as a respondent
                                                    version, and that the confidential                                                                             Soitec S.A., Parc Technologique des
                                                                                                            [Investigation No. 337–TA–966]
                                                    business information is clearly                                                                                Fontaines of Bernin, France
                                                    identified by means of brackets. All                    Certain Silicon-on-Insulator Wafers;                   (‘‘Respondent’’). Id. The Office of Unfair
                                                    written submissions, except for                         Commission Determination Not To                        Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) also was
                                                    confidential business information, will                 Review an Initial Determination                        named as a party to the investigation. Id.
                                                    be made available for inspection by                     Granting an Unopposed Motion for                       Subsequently, the investigation was
                                                    interested parties.                                     Termination of the Investigation Based                 partially terminated as to several patent
                                                                                                            on Withdrawal of the Complaint;                        claims, leaving only asserted claim 1 of
                                                       The Commission may include some or                                                                          the ’563 patent; claim 1 of the ’705
                                                    all of the confidential business                        Termination of the Investigation
                                                                                                                                                                   patent; and claims 1 and 15 of the ’599
                                                    information submitted in the course of                  AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                       patent remaining in the investigation.
                                                    this investigation in the report it sends               Commission.                                            See Notice (Feb. 25, 2016) (determining
                                                    to the USTR. Additionally, all                          ACTION: Notice.                                        not to review Order No. 7 (Jan. 22,
                                                    information, including confidential                                                                            2016)); Notice (Mar. 1, 2016)
                                                    business information, submitted in this                 SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that                (determining not to review Order No. 8
                                                    investigation may be disclosed to and                   the U.S. International Trade                           (Feb. 2, 2016)); Notice (May 4, 2016)
                                                    used: (i) By the Commission, its                        Commission has determined not to                       (determining not to review Order No. 12
                                                    employees and Offices, and contract                     review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)               (Apr. 5, 2016)); Notice (May 31, 2016)
                                                    personnel (a) for developing or                         (Order No. 16) granting an unopposed                   (determining not to review Order No. 14
                                                    maintaining the records of this or a                    motion to terminate the investigation in               (May 5, 2016)).
                                                    related proceeding, or (b) in internal                  whole based on complainant’s                              On May 18, 2016, Complainant filed
                                                    investigations, audits, reviews, and                    withdrawal of the complaint.                           an unopposed motion to terminate the
                                                    evaluations relating to the programs,                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                       investigation in whole based on its
                                                    personnel, and operations of the                        Lucy Grace D. Noyola, Office of the                    withdrawal of the complaint. On May
                                                    Commission including under 5 U.S.C.                     General Counsel, U.S. International                    20, 2016, OUII filed a response,
                                                    Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. government                  Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,                    supporting the motion.
                                                                                                            Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–                      On May 20, 2016, the presiding
                                                    employees and contract personnel for
                                                                                                            205–3438. Copies of non-confidential                   administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
                                                    cybersecurity purposes. The
                                                                                                            documents filed in connection with this                an ID (Order No. 16) granting the
                                                    Commission will not otherwise disclose                                                                         motion. The ALJ found no extraordinary
                                                                                                            investigation are or will be available for
                                                    any confidential business information in                                                                       circumstances preventing termination of
                                                                                                            inspection during official business
                                                    a manner that would reveal the                                                                                 the investigation and further found that
                                                                                                            hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
                                                    operations of the firm supplying the                                                                           termination was in the public interest.
                                                                                                            Office of the Secretary, U.S.
                                                    information.                                            International Trade Commission, 500 E                  No petitions for review of the ID were
                                                       Summaries of Written Submissions:                    Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                      filed.
                                                    The Commission intends to publish                       telephone 202–205–2000. General                           The Commission has determined not
                                                    summaries of the positions of interested                information concerning the Commission                  to review the subject ID.
                                                    persons in an appendix to its report.                   may also be obtained by accessing its                     The authority for the Commission’s
                                                    Persons wishing to have a summary of                    Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).                determination is contained in section
                                                    their position included in the appendix                 The public record for this investigation               337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                    should include a summary with their                     may be viewed on the Commission’s                      amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
                                                    written submission. The summary may                     electronic docket (EDIS) at http://                    210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                                                                                            edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                       Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
                                                    not exceed 500 words, should be in
                                                                                                            persons are advised that information on                210).
                                                    MSWord format or a format that can be
                                                    easily converted to MSWord, and                         this matter can be obtained by                           By order of the Commission.
                                                    should not include any confidential                     contacting the Commission’s TDD                          Issued: June 15, 2016.
                                                    business information. The summary will                  terminal on 202–205–1810.                              Lisa R. Barton,
                                                    be published as provided if it meets                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                         Secretary to the Commission.
                                                    these requirements and is germane to                    Commission instituted this investigation               [FR Doc. 2016–14593 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    the subject matter of the investigation.                on September 24, 2015, based on a                      BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                    In the appendix the Commission will                     complaint filed by Silicon Genesis Corp.
                                                    identify the name of the organization                   of San Jose, California (‘‘Complainant’’).
                                                    furnishing the summary, and will                        80 FR 57641 (Sept. 24, 2015). The                      INTERNATIONAL TRADE
                                                                                                            complaint, as amended, alleges                         COMMISSION
                                                    include a link to the Commission’s
                                                                                                            violations of section 337 of the Tariff
                                                    Electronic Document Information                                                                                [Investigation No. 337–TA–941]
                                                                                                            Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
                                                    System (EDIS) where the full written                    1337, in the importation into the United
                                                    submission can be found.                                                                                       Certain Graphics Processing Chips,
                                                                                                            States, the sale for importation, and/or
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                   Systems on a Chip, and Products
                                                      By order of the Commission.                           the sale within the United States after
                                                                                                                                                                   Containing the Same; Commission
                                                      Issued: June 16, 2016.                                importation of certain silicon-on-
                                                                                                                                                                   Determination To Grant a Joint Motion
                                                    Lisa R. Barton,                                         insulator wafers by reason of
                                                                                                                                                                   To Terminate the Investigation on the
                                                                                                            infringement of certain claims of U.S.
                                                    Secretary to the Commission.                                                                                   Basis of a Settlement Agreement;
                                                                                                            Patent Nos. 5,985,742; 6,180,496;
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–14618 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]                                                                    Termination of the Investigation
                                                                                                            6,294,814; 6,790,747; 7,811,901;
                                                    BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                  6,013,563 (‘‘the ’563 patent’’); 6,162,705             AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
                                                                                                            (‘‘the ’705 patent’’); and 6,103,599 (‘‘the            Commission.


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:37 Jun 20, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00090   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM   21JNN1


                                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices                                             40349

                                                    ACTION:   Notice.                                       Inc. of El Segundo, California; Jaton                  claim 10 of the ’349 patent; and claims
                                                                                                            Corp. of Fremont, California; Mad Catz,                1 and 3 of the ’734 patent. On December
                                                    SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that                 Inc. of San Diego, California; OUYA,                   22, 2015, the ALJ issued his final ID,
                                                    the U.S. International Trade                            Inc. of Santa Monica, California; Sparkle              which found a violation of all three
                                                    Commission has determined to grant a                    Computer Co., Ltd. of New Taipei City,                 remaining patents. See ID at 1. On
                                                    joint motion to terminate the above-                    Taiwan; Toradex, Inc. of Seattle,                      January 5, 2016, the ALJ issued his
                                                    captioned investigation based on a                      Washington; Wikipad, Inc. of Westlake                  recommended determination on remedy
                                                    settlement agreement.                                   Village, California; ZOTAC International               and bond (RD), which recommended the
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron                    (MCO) Ltd of New Territories, Hong                     issuance of a limited exclusion order
                                                    Traud, Office of the General Counsel,                   Kong; and ZOTAC USA, Inc. of Chino,                    covering all of the infringing articles
                                                    U.S. International Trade Commission,                    California (collectively, Respondents).                imported, sold for importation, or sold
                                                    500 E Street SW., Washington, DC                        Id. The Office of Unfair Import                        after importation by the remaining
                                                    20436, (202) 205–3427. Copies of non-                   Investigations (OUII) is also a party to               respondents. RD at 9. The RD also
                                                    confidential documents filed in                         this investigation. Id.                                recommended the issuance of cease and
                                                    connection with this investigation are or                  On May 1, 2015, the Commission                      desist orders to certain domestic
                                                    will be available for inspection during                 determined not to review an initial                    respondents. Id. at 14. The RD
                                                    official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15              determination terminating the                          additionally set a bond in the amount of
                                                    p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.              investigation as to respondent Wikipad,                4% of the average value of the accused
                                                    International Trade Commission, 500 E                   Inc. Notice of Commission                              GPUs and SoCs. Id. at 17.
                                                    Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                       Determination Not to Review an Initial                    The remaining respondents and OUII
                                                    (202) 205–2000. General information                     Determination Terminating the                          filed petitions for review, and OUII, and
                                                    concerning the Commission may also be                   Investigation as to Respondent Wikipad,                Complainants filed responses to the
                                                    obtained at http://www.usitc.gov. The                   Inc. Based on a Consent Order                          petitions. On February 24, 2016, the
                                                    public record for this investigation may                Stipulation, Consent Order, and                        Commission determined to review some
                                                    be viewed on the Commission’s                           Settlement Agreement; Issuance of                      of the petitioned issues. 81 FR 10654
                                                    electronic docket (EDIS) at http://                     Consent Order (May 1, 2015)                            (Mar. 1, 2016). On March 7, 2016, the
                                                    edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                        (determining not to review Order No. 6                 parties filed written submissions on the
                                                    persons are advised that information on                 (Apr. 1, 2015)). On July 1, 2015, the                  issues under review, remedy, the public
                                                    this matter can be obtained by                          Commission determined not to review                    interest, and bonding. On March 14,
                                                    contacting the Commission’s TDD                         an initial determination terminating the               2016, the parties filed reply
                                                    terminal at (202) 205–1810.                             investigation with respect to the ’776                 submissions. No submissions were
                                                                                                            patent. Notice of Commission                           received from the public.
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The                                                                                    On April 29, 2016, and prior to the
                                                                                                            Determination Not to Review an Initial
                                                    Commission instituted this investigation                Determination Terminating the                          Commission’s final determination, the
                                                    on December 30, 2014, based on a                        Investigation with Respect to U.S.                     private parties indicated that they had
                                                    complaint filed by Samsung Electronics                  Patent No. 7,056,776 (July 1, 2015)                    reached a settlement agreement. On May
                                                    Co., Ltd. of Gyeonggi-do, Republic of                   (determining not to review Order No. 9                 16, 2016, the private parties filed a joint
                                                    Korea, and Samsung Austin                               (June 9, 2015)). On August 13, 2015, the               motion to terminate the investigation on
                                                    Semiconductor, LLC of Austin, Texas                     Commission determined not to review                    the basis of that settlement pursuant to
                                                    (collectively, Complainants). 79 FR                     an initial determination finding that the              Commission Rule § 210.21(b). An
                                                    78477–78 (Dec. 30, 2014). The                           economic prong of the domestic                         amended version of the joint motion
                                                    complaint alleges violations of section                 industry requirement has been satisfied.               (the Corrected Joint Motion) was filed
                                                    337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       Notice of a Commission Determination                   on May 19, 2016. The motion to
                                                    amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the                        Not to Review an Initial Determination                 terminate is based on a Memorandum of
                                                    importation into the United States, the                 That the Economic Prong of the                         Understanding Regarding Settlement
                                                    sale for importation, and the sale within               Domestic Industry Requirement Has                      Agreement (MOU), a binding agreement
                                                    the United States after importation of                  Been Satisfied (Aug. 13, 2015)                         between Samsung Electronics and
                                                    certain graphics processing chips                       (determining not review Order No. 12                   NVIDIA. The Corrected Joint Motion
                                                    (GPUs), systems on a chip (SoCs), and                   (July 16, 2015)). On September 17, 2015,               declares that the MOU ‘‘completely
                                                    products containing the same by reason                  the Commission determined not to                       resolves the disputes between all parties
                                                    of infringement of one or more of claims                review (1) an initial determination                    with respect to the asserted patents,’’
                                                    1–4, 6, and 19–21 of U.S. Patent No.                    terminating the investigation as to                    that there are ‘‘no other agreements,
                                                    6,147,385 (the ’385 patent); claim 10 of                claims 19–21 of the ’385 patent and                    written or oral, express or implied,
                                                    U.S. Patent No. 6,173,349 (the ’349                     claims 7–9, 12–15, 17, and 19 of the                   between them concerning the subject
                                                    patent); claims 1, 2, 4, 19, 20, and 22 of              ’734 patent; and (2) an initial                        matter of this investigation,’’ and that
                                                    U.S. Patent No. 7,056,776 (the ’776                     determination terminating the                          ‘‘it is in the interest of the public and
                                                    patent); and claims 1–3, 7–9, 12–15, 17,                investigation as to respondent ZOTAC                   administrative economy to grant this
                                                    and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 7,804,734 (the                International (MCO) Ltd. Notice of                     motion.’’ Corrected Joint Mtn. at 2. The
                                                    ’734 patent). Id. The notice of                         Commission Decision Not to Review                      Corrected Joint Motion includes
                                                    investigation named as respondents                      Two Initial Determinations That                        confidential and public versions of the
                                                    NVIDIA Corporation (NVIDIA) of Santa                                                                           MOU. On May 26, 2016, OUII filed a
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            Terminated the Investigation as to
                                                    Clara, California; Biostar Microtech                    Certain Asserted Patent Claims and as to               submission supporting the termination
                                                    International Corp. of New Taipei,                      One Respondent (Sept. 17, 2015)                        of the investigation. No other party filed
                                                    Taiwan; Biostar Microtech U.S.A. Corp.                  (determining not to review Order No. 23                a response to the Corrected Joint
                                                    of City of Industry, California;                        (Aug. 26, 2015) and Order No. 25 (Aug.                 Motion.
                                                    Elitegroup Computer Systems Co. Ltd.                    26, 2015)).                                               The Commission has determined that
                                                    of Taipei, Taiwan; Elitegroup Computer                     The following claims remained at                    the Corrected Joint Motion complies
                                                    Systems, Inc. of Newark, California;                    issue for consideration by the ALJ:                    with the requirements of section
                                                    EVGA Corp. of Brea, California; Fuhu,                   Claims 1–4 and 6 of the ’385 patent;                   210.21(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:37 Jun 20, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00091   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM   21JNN1


                                                    40350                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices

                                                    of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR                       be recommended for inclusion on future                 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                    210.21(b)(1)), and that there are no                    Joint Board examinations in actuarial
                                                    extraordinary circumstances that would                  mathematics and methodology referred                   Antitrust Division
                                                    prevent the requested termination. The                  to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B) and to
                                                    Commission also finds that granting the                 review the May 2016 Pension (EA–2L)                    Notice Pursuant to the National
                                                    Corrected Joint Motion would not be                     and Basic (EA–1) Examinations in order                 Cooperative Research and Production
                                                    contrary to the public interest pursuant                to make recommendations relative                       Act of 1993—R Consortium, Inc.
                                                    to section 210.50(b)(2) of the                          thereto, including the minimum                            Notice is hereby given that, on May
                                                    Commission’s Rules of Practice and                      acceptable pass scores. Topics for                     23, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
                                                    Procedure (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)).                        inclusion on the syllabus for the Joint                National Cooperative Research and
                                                    Accordingly, the Commission hereby                      Board’s examination program for the                    Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
                                                    grants the Corrected Joint Motion. This                 November 2016 Pension (EA–2F)                          et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), R Consortium, Inc.
                                                    investigation is terminated.                            Examination will be discussed.                         (‘‘R Consortium’’) has filed written
                                                      The authority for the Commission’s                      A determination has been made as                     notifications simultaneously with the
                                                    determination is contained in section                   required by section 10(d) of the Federal               Attorney General and the Federal Trade
                                                    337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                       Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.,                 Commission disclosing changes in its
                                                    amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                   that the portions of the meeting dealing               membership. The notifications were
                                                    210 of the Commission’s Rules of                        with the discussion of questions that                  filed for the purpose of extending the
                                                    Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                     may appear on the Joint Board’s                        Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
                                                    210).                                                   examinations and the review of the May                 antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
                                                      By order of the Commission.                           2016 Pension (EA–2L) and Basic (EA–1)                  under specified circumstances.
                                                      Issued: June 16, 2016.                                Examinations fall within the exceptions                Specifically, Avant, Inc., Chicago, IL,
                                                    Lisa R. Barton,                                         to the open meeting requirement set                    has been added as a party to this
                                                                                                            forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that              venture.
                                                    Secretary to the Commission.
                                                                                                            the public interest requires that such                    No other changes have been made in
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–14657 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            portions be closed to public                           either the membership or planned
                                                    BILLING CODE 7020–02–P                                                                                         activity of the group research project.
                                                                                                            participation.
                                                                                                                                                                   Membership in this group research
                                                                                                              The portion of the meeting dealing                   project remains open, and R Consortium
                                                    JOINT BOARD FOR THE                                     with the discussion of the other topics                intends to file additional written
                                                    ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES                                 will commence at 1:00 p.m. on July 14,                 notifications disclosing all changes in
                                                                                                            2016, and will continue for as long as                 membership.
                                                    Meeting of the Advisory Committee;                      necessary to complete the discussion,                     On September 15, 2015, R Consortium
                                                    Meeting                                                 but not beyond 3:00 p.m. Time                          filed its original notification pursuant to
                                                    AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment                  permitting, after the close of this                    Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
                                                    of Actuaries.                                           discussion by Committee members,                       of Justice published a notice in the
                                                                                                            interested persons may make statements                 Federal Register pursuant to Section
                                                    ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory
                                                                                                            germane to this subject. Persons wishing               6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80
                                                    Committee meeting.                                      to make oral statements should notify                  FR 59815).
                                                    SUMMARY:   The Executive Director of the                the Executive Director in writing prior                   The last notification was filed with
                                                    Joint Board for the Enrollment of                       to the meeting in order to aid in                      the Department on December 3, 2015. A
                                                    Actuaries gives notice of a meeting of                  scheduling the time available and                      notice was published in the Federal
                                                    the Advisory Committee on Actuarial                     should submit the written text, or at a                Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
                                                    Examinations (portions of which will be                 minimum, an outline of comments they                   Act on January 11, 2016 (81 FR 1206).
                                                    open to the public) in Arlington, VA, on                propose to make orally. Such comments
                                                                                                                                                                   Patricia A. Brink,
                                                    July 14–15, 2016.                                       will be limited to 10 minutes in length.
                                                                                                            All persons planning to attend the                     Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
                                                    DATES: Thursday, July 14, 2016, from                                                                           Division.
                                                    9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Friday, July                public session should notify the
                                                                                                                                                                   [FR Doc. 2016–14704 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    15, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                   Executive Director in writing to obtain
                                                                                                            building entry. Notifications of intent to             BILLING CODE P
                                                    ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
                                                    the Internal Revenue Service, 2345                      make an oral statement or to attend
                                                    Crystal Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, VA                 must be sent electronically, by no later
                                                                                                                                                                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                    22202.                                                  than July 7, 2016, to nhqjbea@irs.gov.
                                                                                                            Any interested person also may file a                  Antitrust Division
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                            written statement for consideration by
                                                    Patrick W. McDonough, Executive                         the Joint Board and the Committee by                   Notice Pursuant to the National
                                                    Director of the Joint Board for the                     sending it to: Internal Revenue Service;               Cooperative Research and Production
                                                    Enrollment of Actuaries, 703–414–2173.                  Attn: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive                  Act of 1993—The Open Group, L.L.C.
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is                    Director; Joint Board for the Enrollment
                                                    hereby given that the Advisory                          of Actuaries SE:RPO; REFM, Park 4,                        Notice is hereby given that, on May
                                                    Committee on Actuarial Examinations                                                                            13, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                            Floor 4; 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
                                                    will meet at the Internal Revenue                       Washington, DC 20224.                                  National Cooperative Research and
                                                    Service, 2345 Crystal Drive, Suite 400,                                                                        Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
                                                    Arlington, VA 22202, on Thursday, July                    Dated: June 13, 2016.                                et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The Open Group,
                                                    14, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,                  Patrick W. McDonough,                                  L.L.C. (‘‘TOG’’) has filed written
                                                    and Friday, July 15, 2016, from 8:30                    Executive Director, Joint Board for the                notifications simultaneously with the
                                                    a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                                       Enrollment of Actuaries.                               Attorney General and the Federal Trade
                                                      The purpose of the meeting is to                      [FR Doc. 2016–14542 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]            Commission disclosing changes in its
                                                    discuss topics and questions that may                   BILLING CODE 4830–01–P                                 membership. The notifications were


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:37 Jun 20, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00092   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM   21JNN1



Document Created: 2016-06-21 01:30:36
Document Modified: 2016-06-21 01:30:36
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactRon Traud, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-3427. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation81 FR 40348 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR