81 FR 40825 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 40825-40827 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14897 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 40825-40827] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14897] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R07-OAR-2014-0213; FRL-9948-16-Region 7] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and the Adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 Standard AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve elements of two State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the State of Iowa for the Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards [[Page 40826]] (NAAQS). Infrastructure SIPs address the applicable requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110, which requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred to as ``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state's air quality management program are adequate to meet the state's responsibilities under the CAA. This action also proposes to approve the adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 standard. On September 8, 2011, EPA issued a Finding of Failure to Submit a Complete State Implementation Plan for several states, including Iowa. With respect to Iowa, the Finding of Failure to Submit covered the following 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS infrastructure requirements: 110(a)(2)(A)-(C), (D)(i)(II) (prong 3 only), (E)-(H) and (J)-(M). This proposal to approve Iowa's infrastructure SIP for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS addresses the September 8, 2011 finding. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07- OAR-2014-0213, to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton, Air Planning and Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: (913) 551- 7039; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we refer to EPA. A detailed technical support document (TSD) is included in this rulemaking docket to address the following: A description of CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure SIPs; the applicable elements under sections 110(a)(1) and (2); EPA's approach to the review of infrastructure SIP submissions, and EPA's evaluation of how Iowa addressed the relevant elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2). This section provides additional information by addressing the following questions: I. What is being addressed in this document? II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? III. What action is EPA taking? I. What is being addressed in this document? The EPA is proposing to approve two submissions from the State of Iowa: The infrastructure SIP submissions for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS received on March 31, 2008 and July 29, 2013. The SIP submissions from Iowa address the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. The March 31, 2008 SIP submission also included the state adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 standard. The EPA is also proposing to approve this in today's action. For the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the EPA took action to address section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2 for Iowa. (72 FR 10380, March 8, 2007, as revised in 76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011). Therefore, in this proposal, we are not acting on these portions since they have already been acted upon by the EPA. A TSD is included as part of the docket to discuss the details of this proposal. II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of this document, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. III. What action is EPA taking? The EPA is proposing to approve two submissions from the State of Iowa: The infrastructure SIP submissions for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS received on March 31, 2008 and July 29, 2013. The SIP submissions from Iowa address the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. This action also proposes to approve the adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 standard. The EPA's analysis of these submissions is addressed in a TSD as part of the docket to discuss the proposal. Based upon review of the state's infrastructure SIP submissions and relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced in those submissions or referenced in Iowa's SIP, the EPA believes that Iowa's SIP will meet all applicable required elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) with respect to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after consideration of any comments. Statutory and Executive Order Review Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); [[Page 40827]] Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Statutory Authority The statutory authority for this action is provided by section 110 of the CAA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Prevention of significant deterioration, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate Matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: June 15, 2016. Mark Hague, Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52--Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart Q--Iowa 0 2. Section 52.820 is amended by adding entries (43) and (44) in numerical order to table (e) to read as follows: Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan. * * * * * (e) * * * EPA-Approved Iowa Nonregulatory SIP Provisions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of non-regulatory SIP Applicable geographic State revision or nonattainment area submittal date EPA approval date Explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * (43) Sections 110(a)(1) and Statewide............. 3/21/08 6/23/16 [Insert This action addresses (2) Infrastructure Federal Register the following CAA Requirements 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. citation]. elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. (44) Sections 110(a)(1) and Statewide............. 7/23/13 6/23/16 [Insert This action addresses (2) Infrastructure Federal Register the following CAA Requirements 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. citation]. elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-14897 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules 40825
(h) Modification of Wing Trailing Edge obtain acceptable tolerances, using a method collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
Within 1,000 flight cycles or 12 months, approved by the Manager, International this collection of information is estimated to
whichever occurs first after the effective date Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane be approximately 5 minutes per response,
of this AD, modify the wing trailing edge Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Fokker including the time for reviewing instructions,
lower skin panels into access panels, in Services B.V.’s EASA DOA. completing and reviewing the collection of
accordance with Part 1 of the (2) Where Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100– information. All responses to this collection
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 57–049, dated March 24, 2015, specifies of information are mandatory. Comments
Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated contacting Fokker for a customized repair: concerning the accuracy of this burden and
March 24, 2015. Before further flight, repair using a method suggestions for reducing the burden should
approved by the Manager, International be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
(i) Inspection of the Wing Rear Spar Lower Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Girder From WSTA 2635 to 8700 and WSTA Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Fokker Information Collection Clearance Officer,
11794 to 12975 Services B.V.’s EASA DOA. AES–200.
Within 2,000 flight cycles or 24 months, (l) Reporting Requirements (n) Related Information
whichever occurs first after the effective date
of this AD, accomplish a one-time detailed Submit a report of the findings both (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
visual inspection for corrosion of the wing positive and negative of the inspection Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
rear spar lower girder area from WSTA 2635 required by paragraph (g) and (i) of this AD Airworthiness Directive 2015–0113, dated
to 8700 and WSTA 11794 to 12975, in to Fokker Services, in accordance with the June 22, 2015, for related information. This
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 2015, at the time specified in searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
March 24, 2015. paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD. 2016–7271.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after (2) For service information identified in
(j) Modification of Wing Rear Spar Lower the effective date of this AD: Submit the this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V.,
Girder report within 30 days after the inspection. Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357,
(1) If during any inspection required by (2) If the inspection was done before the 2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands;
paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD, as applicable, effective date of this AD: Submit the report telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31
corrosion is found, before further flight, within 30 days after the effective date of this (0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@
remove the corrosion and determine the AD. fokker.com; Internet http://
remaining thickness at the damaged spots, in www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may view this
accordance with the Accomplishment (m) Other FAA AD Provisions
service information at the FAA, Transport
Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin The following provisions also apply to this Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 2015. If the AD: Renton, WA. For information on the
remaining thickness at the damaged spots, as (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance availability of this material at the FAA, call
determined by this paragraph, is not within (AMOCs): The Manager, International 425–227–1221.
the tolerances specified in Fokker Service Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14,
Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated March 24,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 2016.
2015, except as required by paragraph (k)(1)
of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your Dionne Palermo,
the applicable corrective actions as defined request to your principal inspector or local Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
in paragraph (j)(1)(i) or (j)(1)(ii) of this AD, Flight Standards District Office, as Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
as applicable. appropriate. If sending information directly [FR Doc. 2016–14754 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
(i) For corrosion damage found outboard of to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
WSTA 8200 only: Repair in accordance with Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
the Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Service Bulletin SBF100–57–050, Revision 1, Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
dated May 19, 2015. Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
(ii) Repair using a method approved by the telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1149. AGENCY
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 40 CFR Part 52
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal [EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0213; FRL–9948–16–
Fokker Services B.V.’s EASA Design
inspector, the manager of the local flight Region 7]
Organization Approval (DOA).
(2) If during any inspection required by standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter Approval and Promulgation of
paragraph (g) or (i) of this AD, only damage
to the surface protection is found, or if the must specifically reference this AD. Implementation Plans; State of Iowa;
remaining thickness at the damaged spots, as (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any Infrastructure SIP Requirements for
determined by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, is requirement in this AD to obtain corrective the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate
within the tolerances specified in Fokker actions from a manufacturer, the action must Matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air
Service Bulletin SBF100–57–049, dated be accomplished using a method approved Quality Standards (NAAQS), and the
March 24, 2015, except as required by by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– Adoption of the 1997 PM2.5 Standard
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD: Before further 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
flight, restore the surface protection in the EASA; or Fokker Service B.V.’s EASA AGENCY: Environmental Protection
accordance with the Accomplishment DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval Agency (EPA).
Instructions of Fokker Service Bulletin must include the DOA-authorized signature.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SBF100–57–049, dated March 24, 2015, (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
except as required by paragraph (k)(2) of this agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
AD. person is not required to respond to, nor Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
(k) Exceptions to Service Information elements of two State Implementation
failure to comply with a collection of
Specifications information subject to the requirements of Plan (SIP) submissions from the State of
(1) Where Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100– the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that Iowa for the Infrastructure SIP
57–049, dated March 24, 2015, specifies the collection of information displays a current Requirements for the 1997 and 2006
acceptability of smaller thickness or valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National
customized repairs: Before further flight, Control Number for this information Ambient Air Quality Standards
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40946/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules 40827
• Does not have Federalism The SIP is not approved to apply on Dated: June 15, 2016.
implications as specified in Executive any Indian reservation land or in any Mark Hague,
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, other area where EPA or an Indian tribe Regional Administrator, Region 7.
1999); has demonstrated that a tribe has
For the reasons stated in the
• Is not an economically significant jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
regulatory action based on health or country, the rule does not have tribal
CFR part 52 as set forth below:
safety risks subject to Executive Order implications and will not impose
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); substantial direct costs on tribal PART 52—Approval and Promulgation
• Is not a significant regulatory action governments or preempt tribal law as of Implementation Plans
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
28355, May 22, 2001); FR 67249, November 9, 2000). ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
• Is not subject to requirements of continues to read as follows:
section 12(d) of the National Statutory Authority
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Technology Transfer and Advancement The statutory authority for this action
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because is provided by section 110 of the CAA, Subpart Q—Iowa
application of those requirements would as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410).
be inconsistent with the CAA; and ■ 2. Section 52.820 is amended by
• Does not provide EPA with the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
adding entries (43) and (44) in
discretionary authority to address, as Environmental protection, Air numerical order to table (e) to read as
appropriate, disproportionate human pollution control, Prevention of follows:
health or environmental effects, using significant deterioration, Incorporation
practicable and legally permissible by reference, Intergovernmental § 52.820 Identification of plan.
methods, under Executive Order 12898 relations, Particulate Matter, Reporting * * * * *
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). and recordkeeping requirements. (e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS
Applicable
Name of non-regulatory geographic or State submittal EPA approval Explanation
SIP revision nonattainment date date
area
* * * * * * *
(43) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Statewide .......... 3/21/08 6/23/16 [Insert This action addresses the following CAA elements:
Infrastructure Requirements Federal Reg- 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F),
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. ister citation]. (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not ap-
plicable.
(44) Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) Statewide .......... 7/23/13 6/23/16 [Insert This action addresses the following CAA elements:
Infrastructure Requirements Federal Reg- 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), prong 3, (E), (F),
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. ister citation]. (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). 110(a)(2)(I) is not ap-
plicable.
[FR Doc. 2016–14897 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] Ambient Air Quality Standards submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P (NAAQS). The infrastructure accompanied by a written comment.
requirements are designed to ensure that The written comment is considered the
the structural components of each official comment and should include
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION state’s air quality management program discussion of all points you wish to
AGENCY are adequate to meet the state’s make. EPA will generally not consider
responsibilities under the CAA. comments or comment contents located
40 CFR Part 52 DATES: Comments must be received on outside of the primary submission (i.e.
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0824; FRL–9948–22– or before July 25, 2016. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
Region 5] ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, system). For additional submission
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– methods, please contact the person
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Infrastructure OAR–2015–0824 at http:// identified in the FOR FURTHER
SIP Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 www.regulations.gov or via email to INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
NAAQS aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For full EPA public comment policy,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection comments submitted at Regulations.gov, information about CBI or multimedia
Agency (EPA). follow the online instructions for submissions, and general guidance on
submitting comments. Once submitted,
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION: Proposed rule. making effective comments, please visit
comments cannot be edited or removed http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection from Regulations.gov. For either manner commenting-epa-dockets.
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve of submission, EPA may publish any
elements of the state implementation comment received to its public docket. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
plan (SIP) submission from Ohio Do not submit electronically any Joseph Ko, Environmental Engineer,
regarding the infrastructure information you consider to be Attainment Planning and Maintenance
requirements of section 110 of the Clean Confidential Business Information (CBI) Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Air Act (CAA) for the 2012 fine or other information whose disclosure is Environmental Protection Agency,
particulate matter (PM2.5) National restricted by statute. Multimedia Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40946/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:41:32
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:41:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016. | |
| Contact | Heather Hamilton, Air Planning and Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: (913) 551- | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 40825 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Prevention of Significant Deterioration; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR