81 FR 40834 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 40834-40838 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14806 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 40834-40838] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14806] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 [EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0698; FRL-9948-00-Region 5] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; supplemental. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a supplement to its July 11, 2013, proposed approval of Indiana's request to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Louisville, Indiana-Kentucky, area to attainment for the 1997 annual national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5 ). After EPA's proposed redesignation in 2013, an audit of the Kentucky monitoring program identified problems which invalidated monitoring data for 2012 and the beginning of 2013. Because of this invalid data, the area could not meet the requirement that the entire area must demonstrate attainment of the standard using the most current three years of data. This supplemental proposal provides new quality-assured, quality-controlled data for the most recent three years of data showing that the entire area attains the 1997 PM2.5 standard. In the supplemental proposal EPA is proposing that the entire Louisville area is attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS based on the most recent three years of data. EPA also discusses the maintenance plan out-year emission projections, and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) remanded budgets impact on the Louisville area--because the status of these issues has changed from the initial proposal to now. EPA is seeking comment only on the issues raised in this supplemental proposal, and is not re-opening for comment other issues raised in the July 11, 2013, proposed approval. DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2011-0698 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Persoon, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8290, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is arranged as follows: I. What is the background for the supplemental proposal? II. On what specific issues is EPA taking comment? A. Louisville Area Design Values for 2013-2015; Entire Area Monitoring Attainment B. Demonstration of Maintenance C. CAIR and CSAPR III. Summary of Proposed Actions IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What is the background for the supplemental proposal? On June 16, 2011, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a request for EPA to approve the redesignation of the Indiana portion of the Louisville (KY-IN) (Madison Township, Indiana, Jefferson County, Kentucky and Clark and Floyd Counties, Indiana) nonattainment area to attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 annual standard. Indiana's June 16, 2011, redesignation submittal contained complete, quality-assured and certified air monitoring data for the years 2008-2010. On July 11, 2013, EPA proposed to determine that the Indiana portion of the Louisville area had met the requirements for redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (78 FR 41735). This proposal was based upon our review of ambient air monitoring data from 2009-2011, and preliminary data from 2012. It contained several related actions. First, EPA proposed to approve the request from IDEM to change the legal designation of the Indiana portion of the Louisville area from nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA also proposed to approve Indiana's PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area as a revision to the Indiana state implementation plan (SIP) because the plan met the requirements of section 175A of the CAA. In addition, EPA proposed to approve emissions inventories for primary PM2.5 , and all its precursors as satisfying the requirement in section 172(c)(3) of the CAA for a comprehensive, current emission inventory. Finally, EPA proposed a [[Page 40835]] motor vehicle emissions budget for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area. EPA did not receive adverse comments on the proposed rulemaking. In August 2013, EPA issued results of a technical systems audit on the PM2.5 laboratory in Kentucky, which invalidated the Jefferson County monitoring data for all of 2012, and a small portion of the monitoring data from 2013 (a portion of the first quarter). See the docket for the technical systems audit information. Since the area could no longer demonstrate attainment of the standard for the entire area, EPA did not finalize its proposal. Kentucky began collecting valid data in early 2013 (the end of the first quarter) after the monitoring audit issues had been addressed, resulting in a valid design value for the area using 2013-2015 data. Both Indiana and Kentucky certified valid data for 2015 in the beginning of 2016. EPA has approved the use of this quality-assured, quality-controlled certified complete data for use in regulatory actions. Today, EPA is publishing a supplement to its July 11, 2013, proposed rulemaking. The supplement is based on valid design values for the 2013-2015 period, demonstrating attainment of the standard for the entire Louisville area using the most recent three years of data. Preliminary data for 2016 shows that the entire Louisville area continues to attain the standard. This proposal also discusses the maintenance plan emission projections of 2025 and the impact of the budgets remanded under CSAPR on the Louisville area because the status of these issues has changed from the initial proposal. II. On what specific issues is EPA taking comments? In this portion of EPA's supplemental proposal, EPA is soliciting comment on the limited issue of the 2013-2015 design values demonstrating attainment of the standard for the entire Louisville area, the maintenance plan emission projections for 2025, and the impact on the Louisville area of the 2015 D.C. Circuit decision remanding certain CSAPR budgets. A. Louisville Area Design Values for 2013-2015; Entire Area Monitoring Attainment EPA is proposing to determine that the Louisville area is attaining the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS based upon the most recent three years of complete, certified and quality-assured data. Under EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 50.7, the annual primary and secondary PM2.5 standards are met when the annual arithmetic mean concentration, as determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter([micro]g/m\3\)at all monitoring sites in the area. Data are considered to be sufficient for comparison to the NAAQS if three consecutive complete years of data exist. A complete year of air quality data is comprised of four calendar quarters, with each quarter containing data from at least 75% capture of the scheduled sampling days. In this case, the 2009-2011 values were calculated prior to the audit invalidating data collected in the Kentucky portion of Louisville for 2012 and beginning of 2013 (portion of the first quarter). The 2013-2015 values are based on quality-assured, quality-controlled, certified complete data, and only included valid data collected after the audit issues were corrected. Preliminary data for 2016 shows the area continues to attain the standard. The Louisville design value for the most current three years of data is 11.7 [mu]g/m\3\. Table 1--The 1997 Annual PM2.5 Design Values for the Louisville Monitor With Complete Data for the 2009-2011,\1\ and 2013-2015 Design Value in [micro]g/m\3\ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Design value Design value County Site 2009-2011 2013-2015 ([mu]g/m\3\) ([mu]g/m\3\) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clark County, IN................................................ 180190006 13.5 11.4 Clark County, IN................................................ 180190008 11.4 9.3 Floyd County, IN................................................ 180431004 12.3 10.0 Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110043 12.6 11.3 Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110051 12.7 11.7 Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110067 12.1 10.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 2009-2011 design values are the desigh values for the area prior to date issues, and design values for 2013- 2015 are the most recent three years of monitoring data showing that the area is attaining the standard. Data recorded at monitors in 2013, 2014, and 2015 are considered valid and were collected after corrective actions resulting from the technical systems audit. These are the data on which EPA is basing its decision that the Louisville area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. B. Demonstration of Maintenance Along with the redesignation request, Indiana submitted a revision to its PM2.5 SIP to include a maintenance plan for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area, as required by section 175A of the CAA. Indiana's plan demonstrates maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard through 2025 by showing that current and future emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX ), directly emitted PM2.5, and sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) in the area remain at or below attainment year emission levels. Section 175A requires a state seeking redesignation to attainment to submit a SIP revision which provides for the maintenance of the NAAQS in the area ``for at least 10 years after the redesignation.'' See September 4, 1992, memorandum from John Calcagni, entitled ``Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment,'' p. 9. Where the emissions inventory method of showing maintenance is used, its purpose is to show that emissions during the maintenance period will not increase over the attainment year inventory. Calcagni Memorandum, pp. 9-10. As discussed in detail in the section below, the state's maintenance plan submission expressly documents that the area's emissions inventories will remain below the attainment year inventories through 2025. In addition, for the reasons set forth below, EPA believes that the state's submission, in conjunction with additional supporting information, further demonstrates that the area will continue to maintain the PM2.5 standard at least through 2026. Thus, if EPA finalizes its proposed approval of the redesignation request and maintenance plan in 2016, it will be based on a showing, in accordance with section 175A, that the state's maintenance plan provides for [[Page 40836]] maintenance for at least ten years after redesignation. Indiana's plan demonstrates maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 by showing that current and future emissions of NOX , directly emitted PM2.5 and SO2 for the area remain at or below attainment year emission levels. The rate of decline in emissions of PM2.5 , NOX , and SO2 from the attainment year 2008 through 2025 (calculated from Table 2) indicates that emissions inventory levels not only significantly decline between 2008 and 2025, but that the reductions will continue in 2026 and beyond. The average annual rate of decline is 4,472 tons per year (tpy) for SO2 , 1,052 tpy of NOX , and 8.73 tpy of direct PM for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area, and average annual rate of decline is 4,436 tpy for SO2 , 2,239 tpy of NOX , and 98.1 tpy of direct PM for the entire Louisville area. These rates of decline are consistent with monitored and projected air quality trends, emissions reductions achieved through emissions controls and regulations that will remain in place beyond 2026 and through fleet turnover that will continue beyond 2026, among other factors. We are proposing to find the mobile source contribution to these emissions is expected to remain insignificant in 2026 and beyond because of fleet turnover in upcoming years that will result in cleaner vehicles and cleaner fuels. A maintenance demonstration need not be based on modeling. See Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d 426 (6th Cir. 2001), Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F. 3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004). See also 66 FR 53094, 53099-53100 (October 19, 2001), 68 FR 25413, 25430-25432 (May 12, 2003), 78 FR 53272 (August 29, 2013). Indiana uses emissions inventory projections for the years 2015 and 2025 to demonstrate maintenance for the entire Louisville area. The projected emissions were estimated by Indiana, with assistance from the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) and the Kentucky Regional Planning and Development Agency (KIPDA), who used the MOVES2010a model for mobile source projections. Projection modeling of inventory emissions was done for the 2015 interim year emissions using estimates based on the 2008 and 2015 LADCO modeling inventory, using LADCO's growth factors, for all sectors. The 2025 maintenance year emission estimates were based on emissions estimates from the 2015 LADCO modeling. Table 2 shows the 2008 attainment base year emission estimates and the 2015 and 2025 emission projections for the Louisville area, taken from Indiana's June 16, 2011, submission. Table 2--Comparison of 2008, 2015 and 2025 NOX, Direct PM2.5 and SO2 Emission Totals (tpy) for the Louisville Area ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SO2 NOX PM2.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2008 (baseline).................. 151,503.01............... 97,533.93............... 6,724.02. 2015............................. 76,958.54................ 69,936.67............... 5,540.29. 2025............................. 76,082.07................ 59,455.17............... 5,055.61. Change 2008-2025................. -75,420.94............... -38,078.76.............. -1,668.41. 50% decrease............. 39% decrease............ 25% decrease. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table 2 shows that, for the period between 2008 and the maintenance projection for 2025, the Louisville area will reduce NOX emissions by 38,078 tpy; direct PM2.5 emissions by 1,668 tpy; and SO2 emissions by 75,420 tpy. The 2025 projected emissions levels are significantly below attainment year inventory levels, and, based on the rate of decline, it is highly improbable that any increases in these levels will occur in 2026 and beyond. Thus, the emissions inventories set forth in Table 2 show that the area will continue to maintain the annual PM2.5 standards during the maintenance period and at least through 2026. As Table 1 and 2 demonstrate, monitored PM2.5 design value concentrations in the Louisville area are well below the NAAQS in the years beyond 2008, an attainment year for the area. Further, those values are trending downward as time progresses. Based on the future projections of emissions in 2025 showing significant emissions reductions in direct PM2.5 , NOX , and SO2 , it is very unlikely that monitored PM2.5 values in 2026 and beyond will show violations of the NAAQS. Additionally, the 2013-2015 design value of 11.7 [mu]g/m\3\ provides a sufficient margin for the 1997 standard in the unlikely event emissions rise slightly in the future. C. CAIR and CSAPR In its redesignation request and maintenance plan, the state identified the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) as a permanent and enforceable measure that contributed to attainment in the Louisville Area. CAIR created regional cap-and-trade programs to reduce SO2 and NOX emissions in 27 eastern states, including Indiana, that contributed to downwind nonattainment or interfered with maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. See 70 FR 25162 (May 12, 2005). Indiana adopted CAIR budgets into its SIP on November 1, 2006, with emission reductions beginning in 2010 and extending into 2015. By 2007, the beginning of the attainment time period identified by Indiana, CAIR had begun achieving emission reductions in the state. In 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) vacated CAIR, North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir. 2008); but ultimately remanded the rule to EPA without vacatur to preserve the environmental benefits provided by CAIR, North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir. 2008). On August 8, 2011 (76 FR 48208), acting on the D.C. Circuit's remand, EPA promulgated CSAPR to replace CAIR and, thus, to address the interstate transport of emissions contributing to nonattainment and interfering with maintenance of the two air quality standards covered by CAIR as well as the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. CSAPR requires substantial reductions of SO2 and NOX emissions from emission generating units (EGUs) in 28 states in the eastern United States. As a general matter, because CSAPR is CAIR's replacement, emissions reductions associated with CAIR will for most areas be made permanent and enforceable through implementation of CSAPR. Numerous parties filed petitions for review of CSAPR in the D.C. Circuit, and on August 21, 2012, the court issued its ruling, vacating and remanding CSAPR to EPA and ordering continued implementation of CAIR. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7, 38 (D.C. Cir. 2012). The D.C. Circuit's vacatur of CSAPR was reversed by the United States Supreme Court on April 29, 2014, and the case was remanded to the D.C. Circuit to resolve remaining issues in accordance with the high court's ruling. EPA v. EME [[Page 40837]] Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1584 (2014). On remand, the D.C. Circuit affirmed CSAPR in most respects, but invalidated without vacating some of the CSAPR budgets as to a number of states. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 795 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (EME Homer City II). The Phase 2 annual and ozone season NOX and SO2 budgets for Indiana are not affected by the Court's decision. The litigation over CSAPR ultimately delayed implementation of that rule for three years, from January 1, 2012, when CSAPR's cap- and-trade programs were originally scheduled to replace the CAIR cap- and-trade programs, to January 1, 2015. CSAPR's Phase 2 budgets were originally promulgated to begin on January 1, 2014, and are now scheduled to begin on January 1, 2017. CSAPR will continue to operate under the existing emissions budgets until EPA addresses the D.C. Circuit's remand. The Court's decision did not affect Indiana's CSAPR emissions budgets; therefore, CSAPR ensures that the NOX and SO2 emissions reductions associated with CAIR and CSPAR throughout Indiana are permanent and enforceable.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 2009-2011 design values are the design values for the area prior to data issues, and design values for 2013-2015 are the most recent three years of monitoring data showing that the area is attaining the standard. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its redesignation request, Indiana noted that a number of states contributed to PM2.5 concentrations in the Louisville area based on EPA air quality modeling. Additionally, an air quality modeling analysis conducted by IDEM demonstrates that the Louisville area would be able to attain the PM2.5 standard even in the absence of either CAIR or CSAPR. See appendices H and I of Indiana's redesignation request found in the docket. This modeling is available in the docket for this proposed redesignation action. To the extent that Louisville relies on CSAPR for maintenance of the standard, EPA has identified the Louisville area as having been significantly impacted by pollution transported from other states in both CAIR and CSAPR, and these rules greatly reduced the tons of SO2 and NOX emissions generated in the states upwind of the area. The air quality modeling performed for the CSAPR rulemaking identified the following states as having contributed to PM2.5 concentrations in the Louisville area: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia and Wisconsin. See 76 FR 48208(August 8, 2011). Even though the first phase of CAIR implementation for SO2 did not begin until 2010, many sources began reducing their emissions well in advance of the first compliance deadline because of the incentives offered by CAIR for early compliance with the rule. The emission reductions in the states upwind of the Louisville area achieved by CAIR, and made permanent by CSAPR, are unaffected by the D.C. Circuit's remand of CSAPR.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ The D.C. Circuit in EME Homer City II remanded the SO2 trading program budgets for four states, none of which were identified as contributing to the Louisville area. Moreover, updated air quality modeling performed for the CSAPR identified that the Louisville area can attain and maintain the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and no modeled issues for the 2012 NAAQS 76 FR 48207, 48241 (August 8, 2011) and Page memo, March 17, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Summary of Proposed Actions EPA is issuing a supplement to its action, published July 11, 2013, which proposed to redesignate the Indiana portion of the Louisville area to attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, to approve the associated maintenance plan, and to approve the state's emission inventory. EPA is concluding that the most current three year design values show that the area is attaining the standard and preliminary values show the area continues to attain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA also determined that the projections used in the states submittal meet the requirements of the maintenance plan out-year emission projections. EPA concluded that the CSAPR remanded budgets did not affect the area's ability to attain through permanent and enforceable measures and will not affect the area's ability to maintain the standard. EPA is seeking comment only on the issues raised in this supplemental proposal, and is not re-opening comment on other issues addressed in its prior proposal. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those imposed by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, these proposed actions do not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law and the CAA. For that reason, these proposed actions:Are not ``significant regulatory actions'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Do not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Are certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Do not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Are not economically significant regulatory actions based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Are not significant regulatory actions subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because a determination of attainment is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory requirements on tribes, impact any existing sources of air pollution on tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance of ozone national ambient air quality standards in tribal lands. List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by [[Page 40838]] reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter. 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Dated: June 1, 2016. Robert A. Kaplan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2016-14806 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![40834 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• is not a significant regulatory action an audit of the Kentucky monitoring FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR program identified problems which Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
28355, May 22, 2001); invalidated monitoring data for 2012 Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
• is not subject to requirements of and the beginning of 2013. Because of Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Section 12(d) of the National this invalid data, the area could not Environmental Protection Agency,
Technology Transfer and Advancement meet the requirement that the entire Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because area must demonstrate attainment of the Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8290,
application of those requirements would standard using the most current three persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
be inconsistent with the CAA; and years of data. This supplemental SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• does not provide EPA with the proposal provides new quality-assured, Throughout this document whenever
discretionary authority to address, as quality-controlled data for the most ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
appropriate, disproportionate human recent three years of data showing that EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
health or environmental effects, using the entire area attains the 1997 PM2.5 section is arranged as follows:
practicable and legally permissible standard. In the supplemental proposal I. What is the background for the
methods, under Executive Order 12898 EPA is proposing that the entire supplemental proposal?
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Louisville area is attaining the 1997 II. On what specific issues is EPA taking
In addition, the SIP is not approved PM2.5 NAAQS based on the most recent comment?
to apply on any Indian reservation land three years of data. EPA also discusses A. Louisville Area Design Values for 2013–
or in any other area where EPA or an the maintenance plan out-year emission 2015; Entire Area Monitoring Attainment
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a projections, and the Cross-State Air B. Demonstration of Maintenance
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Pollution Rule (CSAPR) remanded C. CAIR and CSAPR
Indian country, the rule does not have III. Summary of Proposed Actions
budgets impact on the Louisville area— IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
tribal implications and will not impose because the status of these issues has
substantial direct costs on tribal changed from the initial proposal to I. What is the background for the
governments or preempt tribal law as now. EPA is seeking comment only on supplemental proposal?
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 the issues raised in this supplemental
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). On June 16, 2011, the Indiana
proposal, and is not re-opening for Department of Environmental
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 comment other issues raised in the July Management (IDEM) submitted a
Environmental protection, Air 11, 2013, proposed approval. request for EPA to approve the
pollution control, Incorporation by DATES: Comments must be received on redesignation of the Indiana portion of
reference, Intergovernmental relations, or before July 25, 2016. the Louisville (KY-IN) (Madison
Particulate matter, Reporting and Township, Indiana, Jefferson County,
recordkeeping requirements. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Kentucky and Clark and Floyd Counties,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– Indiana) nonattainment area to
Dated: June 14, 2016. OAR–2011–0698 at http:// attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 annual
Robert A. Kaplan, www.regulations.gov or via email to standard. Indiana’s June 16, 2011,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments redesignation submittal contained
[FR Doc. 2016–14894 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the complete, quality-assured and certified
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P online instructions for submitting air monitoring data for the years 2008–
comments. Once submitted, comments 2010.
cannot be edited or removed from On July 11, 2013, EPA proposed to
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Regulations.gov. For either manner of determine that the Indiana portion of
AGENCY submission, EPA may publish any the Louisville area had met the
comment received to its public docket. requirements for redesignation under
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 Do not submit electronically any section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0698; FRL–9948–00– information you consider to be (CAA) (78 FR 41735). This proposal was
Region 5] Confidential Business Information (CBI) based upon our review of ambient air
or other information whose disclosure is monitoring data from 2009–2011, and
Approval and Promulgation of Air restricted by statute. Multimedia preliminary data from 2012. It contained
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be several related actions.
Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of accompanied by a written comment. First, EPA proposed to approve the
the Louisville Area to Attainment of the The written comment is considered the request from IDEM to change the legal
1997 Annual Standard for Fine official comment and should include designation of the Indiana portion of the
Particulate Matter discussion of all points you wish to Louisville area from nonattainment to
AGENCY: Environmental Protection make. EPA will generally not consider attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5
Agency (EPA). comments or comment contents located NAAQS. EPA also proposed to approve
ACTION: Proposed rule; supplemental. outside of the primary submission (i.e. Indiana’s PM2.5 maintenance plan for
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing the Indiana portion of the Louisville
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection system). For additional submission area as a revision to the Indiana state
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Agency (EPA) is issuing a supplement to methods, please contact the person implementation plan (SIP) because the
its July 11, 2013, proposed approval of identified in the FOR FURTHER plan met the requirements of section
Indiana’s request to redesignate the INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 175A of the CAA. In addition, EPA
Indiana portion of the Louisville, full EPA public comment policy, proposed to approve emissions
Indiana-Kentucky, area to attainment for information about CBI or multimedia inventories for primary PM2.5, and all its
the 1997 annual national ambient air submissions, and general guidance on precursors as satisfying the requirement
quality standard (NAAQS or standard) making effective comments, please visit in section 172(c)(3) of the CAA for a
for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). After http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ comprehensive, current emission
EPA’s proposed redesignation in 2013, commenting-epa-dockets. inventory. Finally, EPA proposed a
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40955/page/1.svg)
![40838 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Mark the outside of the envelope: Monkfish are often caught while
Particulate matter. ‘‘Comments on Monkfish Framework fishing for Northeast (NE) multispecies,
9.’’ particularly in the NFMA. This has
40 CFR Part 81
Instructions: Comments sent by any resulted in two closely related fisheries
Environmental protection, Air other method, to any other address or as a majority of monkfish vessels
pollution control, National parks, individual, or received after the end of operating in the NFMA are issued both
Wilderness areas. the comment period, may not be monkfish and NE multispecies permits.
Dated: June 1, 2016. considered by NMFS. All comments Because this action proposes to modify
Robert A. Kaplan, received are a part of the public record some requirements for NE multispecies
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
and will generally be posted for public sector vessels, it is also considered
viewing on www.regulations.gov Framework Adjustment 54 to the NE
[FR Doc. 2016–14806 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
without change. All personal identifying Multispecies FMP.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), The monkfish fishery is primarily
confidential business information, or managed by landing limits and a yearly
otherwise sensitive information allocation of monkfish days-at-sea
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE submitted voluntarily by the sender will (DAS) calculated to enable vessels
be publicly accessible. NMFS will participating in the fishery to catch, but
National Oceanic and Atmospheric not exceed, the target total allowable
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
Administration landings (TAL) and the annual catch
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to target (ACT, the TAL plus an estimate
50 CFR Part 648 of expected discards) in each
electronic comments will be accepted in
[150306232–6491–01] Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF management area. Both the ACT and the
file formats only. TAL are calculated to maximize yield in
RIN 0648–BE96
New England Fishery Management the fishery over the long term. Based on
Fisheries of the Northeastern United Council staff prepared an environmental a yearly evaluation of the monkfish
States; Monkfish; Framework assessment (EA) for Monkfish fishery, the Councils may revise existing
Adjustment 9 Framework Adjustment 9 that describes management measures through the
the proposed action and other framework provisions of the FMP,
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries considered alternatives. The EA including DAS allocations and landing
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and provides a thorough analysis of the limits, to better achieve the goals and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), biological, economic, and social impacts objectives of the FMP and achieve
Commerce. of the proposed measures and other optimum yield (OY), as required by the
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for considered alternatives, a preliminary Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
comments. Regulatory Impact Review, and Conservation and Management Act.
economic analysis. Copies of the Amendment 5 (76 FR 30265; May 25,
SUMMARY: We are proposing to approve Framework 9 EA are available on 2011) defined OY as fully harvesting the
and implement regulations submitted by request from Thomas A. Nies, Executive ACT.
the New England and Mid-Atlantic Director, New England Fishery We completed an operational stock
Fishery Management Councils in Management Council, 50 Water Street, assessment in May 2013 to update the
Framework Adjustment 9 to the Newburyport, MA 01950. This state of the monkfish stocks and provide
Monkfish Fishery Management Plan. document is also available from the projections to assist with setting future
This action is necessary to better following internet addresses: http:// catch levels. The 2013 assessment
achieve the goals and objectives of the www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/ update revised existing biological
management plan and achieve optimum or http://www.nefmc.org. reference points, including a substantial
yield. The proposed action is intended FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: reduction in the overfishing level, and
to enhance the operational and Allison Murphy, Fishery Policy Analyst, concluded that the two monkfish stocks
economic efficiency of existing (978) 281–9122. are neither overfished nor subject to
management measures and increase overfishing.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
monkfish landings. The monkfish fishery has failed to
DATES: Public comments must be Background fully harvest the available ACT each
received by July 8, 2016. The monkfish fishery is jointly year since 2011, particularly in the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments managed under the Monkfish Fishery NFMA where the under-harvest has
on this document, identified by NOAA– Management Plan (FMP) by the New been more substantial. As a result, the
NMFS–2015–0045, by either of the England and the Mid-Atlantic Fishery fishery has not been achieving OY in
following methods: Management Councils. The fishery either area in recent years. The Councils
• Electronic Submission: Submit all extends from Maine to North Carolina developed Framework 9 to enhance the
electronic public comments via the from the coast out to the end of the operational efficiency of existing
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to continental shelf. The Councils manage management measures in an effort to
www.regulations.gov/ the fishery as two management units, better achieve OY.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015- with the Northern Fishery Management Proposed Measures
0045, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, Area (NFMA) covering the Gulf of
complete the required fields, and enter Maine (GOM) and northern part of 1. Monkfish Possession Limits in the
or attach your comments. Georges Bank (GB), and the Southern NFMA
• Mail: Submit written comments to Fishery Management Area (SFMA) This action would revise monkfish
John K. Bullard, Regional extending from the southern flank of GB possession limits specified in 50 CFR
Administrator, National Marine through Southern New England (SNE) 648.94 to help increase monkfish
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic and into the Mid-Atlantic (MA) Bight to landings and better achieve the ACT
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2276. North Carolina. caught in the NFMA. Specifically, this
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM 23JNP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_40955/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:41:27
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:41:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule; supplemental. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016. | |
| Contact | Carolyn Persoon, Environmental Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8290, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 40834 | |
| CFR Citation | 40
CFR
52 40 CFR 81 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter; National Parks and Wilderness Areas |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR