81 FR 40932 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Composition, Terms of Members and Election Procedures for the National Adjudicatory Council
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 121 (June 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 40932-40935 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14837 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 40932-40935] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14837] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-78094; File No. SR-FINRA-2016-014] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Composition, Terms of Members and Election Procedures for the National Adjudicatory Council June 17, 2016. I. Introduction On April 28, 2016, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend the By-Laws of FINRA's regulatory subsidiary, FINRA Regulation, Inc. (``FINRA Regulation''), to expand the size of the National Adjudicatory Council (``NAC'') to 15 members, with the number of non-industry members exceeding the number of industry members; lengthen the terms of office of future NAC members to four years; and update the process used for sending and counting ballots in the event of a contested nomination and election to fill certain NAC industry member seats. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on May 13, 2016.\3\ The Commission received four comment letters on the proposal.\4\ Thereafter, FINRA submitted a letter in response to the comment letters.\5\ This order grants approval of the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77786 (May 9, 2016), 81 FR 29929 (May 13, 2016) (``Notice''). \4\ See Letters from Steven B. Caruso, Esq., Maddox Hargett Caruso, P.C., dated May 9, 2016 (``Caruso Letter''); David T. Bellaire, Esq., Executive Vice President & General Counsel, Financial Services Institute, dated May 19, 2016 (``FSI Letter''); Hugh Berkson, Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association, dated June 2, 2016 (``PIABA Letter''); and Christopher E. Berman, Barry University, dated June 2, 2016 (``Berman Letter''). \5\ See Letter from Gary Dernelle, Associate General Counsel, FINRA, dated June 13, 2016 (``FINRA Letter''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposal \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ A full description of the proposal can be found in the Notice. See Notice, supra note 3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FINRA Regulation By-Laws establish the composition of the NAC,\7\ the terms of its members, and the process by which members are selected. The NAC is currently composed of fourteen members.\8\ The number of Non-Industry Members, which must include at least three Public Members, equals the number of Industry Members.\9\ The [[Page 40933]] seven Industry Members include two Small Firm NAC Members, one Mid-Size Firm NAC Member, two Large Firm NAC Members and two at-large Industry Members.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ The NAC acts on behalf of FINRA in several capacities and its powers are authorized by the By-Laws of FINRA Regulation and FINRA's Code of Procedure. The NAC presides over disciplinary matters appealed to or called for review by the NAC. The NAC also acts, when requested, in statutory disqualification and membership proceedings; considers the appeals of members seeking exemptive relief; and retains the authority to review decisions proposed in other proceedings as set forth in the Code of Procedure. For most matters that the NAC considers, it prepares a proposed written decision, which becomes final FINRA action if the Board does not call the matter for review. See Notice, supra note 3. \8\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a) (Number of Members and Qualifications). \9\ Id. A ``Non-Industry Member'' of the NAC includes any Public Member, an officer or employee of an issuer of securities listed on a market for which FINRA provides regulation, an officer or employee of an issuer of unlisted securities that are traded in the over-the- counter market, or any individual who would not otherwise fall within the definition of an Industry Member. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions), paragraph (ee). A ``Public Member'' generally is a Non-Industry Member who has no material business relationship with a broker or dealer or a self-regulatory organization registered under the Act. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions), paragraph (hh). An ``Industry Member'' generally includes a person who is or served in the prior year as an officer, director, employee or controlling person of a broker- dealer; is an officer, director or employee of an entity that owns a material equity interest in a broker-dealer; owns personally a material equity interest in a broker-dealer; provides professional services to broker-dealers, or to a director, officer, or employee of a broker-dealer in their professional capacity, where the revenues from such services meet material thresholds; or is or served in the prior year as a consultant, employee or provider of professional services to a self-regulatory organization registered under the Act. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions), paragraph (x). \10\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a) (Number of Members and Qualifications). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The FINRA Board appoints the NAC and its members.\11\ The FINRA Board appoints Non-Industry Members and at-large Industry Members from candidates recommended by the Nominating Committee. The FINRA Board also appoints Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large Firm NAC Members, either from candidates recommended by the Nominating Committee, or in the event of a contested election for a Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm or Large Firm NAC Member vacancy, the candidate who is elected by FINRA members based on their vote for a candidate.\12\ The Small Firm, Mid- Size Firm or Large Firm NAC Member candidate receiving the largest number of votes from firms of corresponding size is declared the nominee, and the Nominating Committee sends a written certification of the results to the FINRA Board and nominates such candidate for appointment to the NAC.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.3 (Appointments). \12\ Id. \13\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VI (Selection of Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large Firm Industry Members of the National Adjudicatory Council), Section 6.13 (Certification of Nomination). The FINRA Board is required to appoint to the NAC the candidate who receives the most votes in any contested election for a Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm or Large Firm NAC Member seat. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.5 (Rejection of Nominating Committee Nominee). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change amends the FINRA Regulation By-Laws in three ways. First, it amends Section 5.2 of the FINRA Regulation By- Laws to expand the size of the NAC from fourteen members to fifteen members and require that the NAC have more Non-Industry Members, including at least three Public Members, than Industry Members. Accordingly, FINRA would add one Non-Industry Member seat to the current 14-member committee. Second, the proposed rule change lengthens the term of office of future NAC members by one year, from three to four years.\14\ In addition, the NAC would be divided into four classes, rather than the current three, that are as equal in number as feasible.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ See Proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.6(a) and (c) (Term of Office). FINRA stated that the proposed rule change would not alter or extend the term of any NAC member serving currently; the rule change would apply prospectively. \15\ See Proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.6(b) (Term of Office). The proposed rule change also amends Section 5.6(a) of the FINRA Regulation By- Laws to provide a three-year transitional period during which the FINRA Board may appoint new NAC members to terms of office less than four years to achieve the staggering necessary to divide the NAC into four classes. FINRA anticipates that, beginning in January 2017, and ending in December 2019, new NAC members would be appointed to terms of either three years or four years to achieve the result of a NAC that is divided into four classes, with each NAC member serving a term of four years. The proposed rule change also makes a conforming amendment to Section 5.6(b) of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws to delete obsolete text related to a prior rule change that replaced region-based Industry NAC members with Industry members that represent FINRA member firms of various sizes. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58909 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 68467 (November 18, 2008) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2008- 046). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the proposed rule change streamlines the NAC election process and aligns it with the process currently used for elections involving the FINRA District Committees. The proposed rule change amends Section 6.7 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws by deleting the term ``envelope'' and adding language to permit ballots to be delivered by additional means.\16\ The proposed rule change aligns the ballot preparation process in NAC elections with that used in FINRA District Committee elections and allows FINRA members to vote using online and telephonic methods in addition to paper ballots.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The proposed rule change would also make a conforming amendment to Section 6.9 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws concerning ballots that are returned as undelivered. \17\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII (District Committees), Section 8.11 (Ballots). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change also amends Section 6.10 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws to simplify the tabulation of ballots by the Independent Agent, by eliminating the provision in Section 6.10 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws that permits NAC candidates and their representatives to observe the Independent Agent's accounting of ballots in contested NAC elections. The proposed rule change would align the ballot counting process used in NAC elections with the process used in FINRA District Committee elections, which does not provide candidates the ability to be present while the Independent Agent opens and counts the ballots.\18\ The proposed rule change will thus expedite the accounting process and permit the Secretary of FINRA to notify the candidates more quickly of NAC election results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII (District Committees), Section 8.14 (General Procedures for Qualification and Accounting of Ballots). According to FINRA, the opportunity to observe the Independent Agent's qualification and accounting of ballots was rarely used by NAC candidates and provided candidates no additional grounds for recourse. Candidates and their representatives are not allowed to see the vote of any FINRA member and the final determination of the qualification of a ballot rests with the Secretary of the Corporation. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VI (Selection of Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large Firm Industry Members of the National Adjudicatory Council), Section 6.10 (General Procedures for Qualification and Accounting of Ballots). FINRA noted that the Secretary of the Corporation must still certify election results. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VI (Selection of Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large Firm Industry Members of the National Adjudicatory Council), Section 6.13 (Certification of Nomination). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Summary of Comment Letters and FINRA's Response One commenter supported the proposed rule change and believed that expanding the size of the NAC and requiring that the number of Non- Industry Members exceed the number of Industry Members would ``clearly advance the public interest and protect investors. . . .'' \19\ Two commenters generally supported the proposed rule change, but believed that FINRA should increase the number of Public Members on the NAC instead of adding an additional Non-Industry Member to the NAC.\20\ Finally, one commenter expressed concerns about modifying the composition of the NAC and lengthening the term of office of future NAC members.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See Caruso Letter (recommending that the proposed rule change be approved on an expedited basis). \20\ See Berman Letter and PIABA Letter. \21\ See FSI Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Composition of the NAC Two commenters suggested that FINRA increase the number of Public Members on the NAC.\22\ Specifically, one commenter expressed concern that while altering the NAC's composition to include a majority of Non- Industry Members would ``enhance its reputation for impartiality and reduce the possibility of deadlock[,]''persons with significant industry connections may qualify as Non-Industry Members.\23\ Similarly, another commenter believed that issuers and employees of issuers who would be categorized as Non-Industry Members ``may be more closely aligned with Industry Members under certain circumstances.'' \24\ One commenter, however, raised concerns about modifying the composition of the [[Page 40934]] NAC.\25\ This commenter believed that the current composition of the NAC achieves a more balanced perspective and that increasing the number of Non-Industry Members on the NAC could diminish expertise on the NAC. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Berman Letter and PIABA Letter. \23\ See Berman Letter. \24\ See PIABA Letter. \25\ See FSI Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its response, FINRA noted that the current and proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws do not limit the ability of the Board to appoint more than three Public Members to the NAC.\26\ However, FINRA believed that explicitly increasing the number of Non-Industry Members that must also be Public Members would unnecessarily restrict FINRA's flexibility to appoint to the NAC a diversity of Non-Industry Members and Public Members that serve best, based on the pool of potential candidates, to strengthen the quality of the NAC and its deliberations and decisions. Further, with respect to concerns regarding Non-Industry Members aligning with Industry Members because of their connections to the securities industry, FINRA made clear that the term Non-Industry Member explicitly excludes any individual that would otherwise fall within the definition of an Industry Member \27\ and that the proposed rule change is similar to the current FINRA By-Laws that require the number of public governors that serve on the Board to exceed the number of industry governors.\28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See FINRA Letter. \27\ See FINRA Letter (citing to FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions), paragraph (ee) (defining Non-Industry Member)). \28\ According to FINRA, while the terms Non-Industry Member and Public Governor are not identical, they are comparable. See FINRA Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In response to the commenter's concern that increasing the number of Non-Industry Members may diminish the NAC's balanced perspective and expertise, FINRA noted that the proposed rule change still maintains FINRA's custom of ``substantial industry participation in the NAC's adjudication of disciplinary and other matters.'' Further, FINRA represented that it is committed to appointing Non-Industry Members that are both highly qualified and provide unique perspectives in NAC deliberations, including expertise in a variety of subjects and issues important to the matters the NAC considers, such as the federal securities laws, just and equitable principals of trade, best professional practices, and corporate governance and compliance. B. Terms of Office for NAC Members One commenter explicitly supported extending the terms of NAC members from three to four years.\29\ This commenter believed that the annual turnover of NAC members compromised the NAC's effectiveness and that unseasoned members lacked the same institutional knowledge as members that have spent a more significant amount of time on the NAC.\30\ However, another commenter raised concerns about extending terms on the NAC.\31\ This commenter, while recognizing the benefit of extending member terms to four years, believed that the current three- year term allows for a rolling board with a variety of views. Accordingly, this commenter suggested that FINRA amend its proposal to re-evaluate the proposed four-year term at a future date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ See Berman Letter. \30\ See Berman Letter. \31\ See FSI Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its response, FINRA noted that the proposed rule change would maintain the current NAC member term limit, which generally prohibits NAC members from serving consecutive terms, and staggered terms. According to FINRA, this should allow a ``regular infusion of fresh ideas and knowledge and generally serve the goal of invigorating NAC deliberations'' with the composition of the NAC changing each year, while allowing NAC members to be fully productive for a longer term. Further, with respect to the commenter's suggestion to re-evaluate the four-year term at a future date, FINRA noted that the NAC's decisions are generally subject to discretionary review by the FINRA Board of Governors. As a result, the FINRA Board of Governors is ``well placed to conduct an ongoing evaluation of the NAC's effectiveness and the quality of its decision making'' and therefore, amending the proposed rule change to establish a date for reevaluating the effectiveness of the longer member terms is unnecessary. C. NAC Selection Process One commenter believed that the revised selection process for contested elections would make the process more efficient and allow for electronic balloting.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ See Berman Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Discussion and Commission Findings After carefully considering the proposal, the comments submitted, and FINRA's response, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities association.\33\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Sections 15A(b)(4), 15A(b)(6) and 15A(b)(8) of the Act, \34\ which require, among other things, that FINRA rules assure a fair representation of its members in the administration of its affairs; are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest; and provide a fair procedure for disciplining of members and persons associated with members. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(4), (b)(6) and (b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that FINRA's proposal to add one Non- Industry Member to the NAC should enhance the independence of the NAC and continue to ensure that a diversity of expertise, experiences and views are represented on the NAC. With respect to commenters' suggestion that FINRA should increase the number of Public Members on the NAC,\35\ the Commission notes that under the proposed rule change FINRA still may appoint more than three Public Members to the NAC,\36\ but retains flexibility to appoint an additional Non-Industry Member or Public Member. According to FINRA, requiring that the Non-Industry Member be a Public Member would restrict its ability to appoint members that serve best, ``based on the pool of potential candidates, to strengthen the quality of the NAC as an adjudicatory body and its deliberations and decisions.'' \37\ Further, with respect to concerns that the current composition of the NAC provides a more balanced perspective and expertise,\38\ FINRA has represented that it will continue to appoint Non-Industry Members that are both highly qualified and provide unique perspectives and expertise in NAC deliberations.\39\ Moreover, while Non-Industry Members would exceed the number of Industry Members, seven [[Page 40935]] of the fifteen NAC members would continue to be Industry Members, including two Small Firm NAC Members, one Mid-Size Firm NAC Member, two Large Firm NAC Members, and two at-large Industry Members.\40\ Accordingly, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change continues to allow for substantial industry participation, while enhancing the overall independence of the NAC. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ See Berman Letter and PIABA Letter. \36\ See current and proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a) (Number of Members and Qualifications) (stating that the National Adjudicatory Council shall consist of at least three Public Members). \37\ See FINRA Letter. \38\ See FSI Letter. \39\ See FINRA Letter. In the past, Non-Industry Members have included professors of law, finance, and business; current and former public pension and retirement system advisers; and leaders of independent, non-profit organizations that provide educational and outreach programs to issuers and investors. Id. \40\ See current and proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a) (Number of Members and Qualifications). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission also believes it is appropriate for FINRA to increase the term of NAC members from three to four years. While one commenter raised concerns about extending member terms,\41\ the Commission believes that the proposed rule change will allow NAC members to spend more time serving and being fully productive after gaining experience on the NAC. At the same time, the Commission believes the current term limits, staggered terms, and composition of the NAC should continue to provide the NAC with varied perspectives and views. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ See FSI Letter. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission also believes that the proposed changes to the NAC selection process to modernize and streamline the process and to align it with the process used in FINRA District Committee elections are appropriate.\42\ The proposed rule change would allow ballots to be delivered and voted by means other than the mail and further simplify the tabulation process by eliminating the provision that allowed NAC candidates and their representatives to observe the Independent Agent's accounting of ballots in a contested election. FINRA stated that candidates rarely opted to observe the Independent Agent and observing the Independent Agent did not provide candidates additional grounds for recourse. NAC candidates and their representatives were not allowed to see the vote of any FINRA member and the final determination of the qualification of a ballot rested with the Secretary of FINRA. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII (District Committees), Sections 8.11 (Ballots), 8.13 (Ballots Returned as Undelivered), and 8.14 (General Procedures for Qualification and Accounting of Ballots). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\43\ that the proposed rule change (FINRA-2016-014) be, and it hereby is approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \43\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\44\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \44\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-14837 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![40932 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Notices
ADDRESSES: Submit comments deadline(s) for each request appear in May 13, 2016.3 The Commission
electronically via the Commission’s section II. received four comment letters on the
Filing Online system at http:// proposal.4 Thereafter, FINRA submitted
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit a letter in response to the comment
comments electronically should contact 1. Docket No(s).: CP2016–214; Filing letters.5 This order grants approval of
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER Title: Notice of the United States Postal the proposed rule change.
INFORMATION CONTACT section by Service of Filing a Functionally
II. Description of the Proposal 6
telephone for advice on filing Equivalent Global Plus 1C Negotiated
alternatives. Service Agreement and Application for The FINRA Regulation By-Laws
Non-Public Treatment of Materials Filed establish the composition of the NAC,7
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: the terms of its members, and the
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
June 16, 2016; Filing Authority: 39 process by which members are selected.
202–789–6820.
U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq.; The NAC is currently composed of
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: fourteen members.8 The number of Non-
Public Representative: Curtis E. Kidd;
Table of Contents Comments Due: June 24, 2016. Industry Members, which must include
This notice will be published in the at least three Public Members, equals
I. Introduction
Federal Register. the number of Industry Members.9 The
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
I. Introduction Stacy L. Ruble, 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77786
Secretary. (May 9, 2016), 81 FR 29929 (May 13, 2016)
The Commission gives notice that the (‘‘Notice’’).
[FR Doc. 2016–14836 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
Postal Service filed request(s) for the 4 See Letters from Steven B. Caruso, Esq., Maddox
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
Commission to consider matters related Hargett Caruso, P.C., dated May 9, 2016 (‘‘Caruso
to negotiated service agreement(s). The Letter’’); David T. Bellaire, Esq., Executive Vice
President & General Counsel, Financial Services
request(s) may propose the addition or Institute, dated May 19, 2016 (‘‘FSI Letter’’); Hugh
removal of a negotiated service Berkson, Public Investors Arbitration Bar
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
agreement from the market dominant or Association, dated June 2, 2016 (‘‘PIABA Letter’’);
COMMISSION and Christopher E. Berman, Barry University, dated
the competitive product list, or the
June 2, 2016 (‘‘Berman Letter’’).
modification of an existing product 5 See Letter from Gary Dernelle, Associate General
currently appearing on the market [Release No. 34–78094; File No. SR–FINRA–
Counsel, FINRA, dated June 13, 2016 (‘‘FINRA
dominant or the competitive product 2016–014] Letter’’).
list. Self-Regulatory Organizations;
6 A full description of the proposal can be found
Section II identifies the docket in the Notice. See Notice, supra note 3.
Financial Industry Regulatory 7 The NAC acts on behalf of FINRA in several
number(s) associated with each Postal Authority, Inc.; Order Approving capacities and its powers are authorized by the By-
Service request, the title of each Postal Proposed Rule Change Relating to Laws of FINRA Regulation and FINRA’s Code of
Service request, the request’s acceptance Composition, Terms of Members and
Procedure. The NAC presides over disciplinary
date, and the authority cited by the matters appealed to or called for review by the
Election Procedures for the National NAC. The NAC also acts, when requested, in
Postal Service for each request. For each Adjudicatory Council statutory disqualification and membership
request, the Commission appoints an proceedings; considers the appeals of members
officer of the Commission to represent June 17, 2016. seeking exemptive relief; and retains the authority
the interests of the general public in the to review decisions proposed in other proceedings
I. Introduction as set forth in the Code of Procedure. For most
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 matters that the NAC considers, it prepares a
(Public Representative). Section II also On April 28, 2016, the Financial proposed written decision, which becomes final
establishes comment deadline(s) Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. FINRA action if the Board does not call the matter
pertaining to each request. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and for review. See Notice, supra note 3.
8 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V
The public portions of the Postal Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
(National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a)
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via ‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section (Number of Members and Qualifications).
the Commission’s Web site (http:// 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act 9 Id. A ‘‘Non-Industry Member’’ of the NAC
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 includes any Public Member, an officer or employee
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to of an issuer of securities listed on a market for
which FINRA provides regulation, an officer or
can be accessed through compliance amend the By-Laws of FINRA’s employee of an issuer of unlisted securities that are
with the requirements of 39 CFR regulatory subsidiary, FINRA traded in the over-the-counter market, or any
3007.40. Regulation, Inc. (‘‘FINRA Regulation’’), individual who would not otherwise fall within the
The Commission invites comments on to expand the size of the National definition of an Industry Member. See FINRA
Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions),
whether the Postal Service’s request(s) Adjudicatory Council (‘‘NAC’’) to 15 paragraph (ee). A ‘‘Public Member’’ generally is a
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent members, with the number of non- Non-Industry Member who has no material
with the policies of title 39. For industry members exceeding the business relationship with a broker or dealer or a
request(s) that the Postal Service states number of industry members; lengthen self-regulatory organization registered under the
Act. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article I
concern market dominant product(s), the terms of office of future NAC (Definitions), paragraph (hh). An ‘‘Industry
applicable statutory and regulatory members to four years; and update the Member’’ generally includes a person who is or
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 process used for sending and counting
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
served in the prior year as an officer, director,
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3010, and 39 ballots in the event of a contested employee or controlling person of a broker-dealer;
is an officer, director or employee of an entity that
CFR part 3020, subpart B. For request(s) nomination and election to fill certain owns a material equity interest in a broker-dealer;
that the Postal Service states concern NAC industry member seats. The owns personally a material equity interest in a
competitive product(s), applicable proposed rule change was published for broker-dealer; provides professional services to
statutory and regulatory requirements comment in the Federal Register on broker-dealers, or to a director, officer, or employee
of a broker-dealer in their professional capacity,
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, where the revenues from such services meet
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). material thresholds; or is or served in the prior year
39 CFR part 3020, subpart B. Comment 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. as a consultant, employee or provider of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_41053/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Notices 40933
seven Industry Members include two would be divided into four classes, will thus expedite the accounting
Small Firm NAC Members, one Mid- rather than the current three, that are as process and permit the Secretary of
Size Firm NAC Member, two Large Firm equal in number as feasible.15 FINRA to notify the candidates more
NAC Members and two at-large Industry Finally, the proposed rule change quickly of NAC election results.
Members.10 streamlines the NAC election process
The FINRA Board appoints the NAC and aligns it with the process currently III. Summary of Comment Letters and
and its members.11 The FINRA Board used for elections involving the FINRA FINRA’s Response
appoints Non-Industry Members and at- District Committees. The proposed rule One commenter supported the
large Industry Members from candidates change amends Section 6.7 of the
recommended by the Nominating proposed rule change and believed that
FINRA Regulation By-Laws by deleting expanding the size of the NAC and
Committee. The FINRA Board also the term ‘‘envelope’’ and adding
appoints Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and requiring that the number of Non-
language to permit ballots to be
Large Firm NAC Members, either from Industry Members exceed the number of
delivered by additional means.16 The
candidates recommended by the Industry Members would ‘‘clearly
proposed rule change aligns the ballot
Nominating Committee, or in the event advance the public interest and protect
preparation process in NAC elections
of a contested election for a Small Firm, investors. . . .’’ 19 Two commenters
with that used in FINRA District
Mid-Size Firm or Large Firm NAC generally supported the proposed rule
Committee elections and allows FINRA
Member vacancy, the candidate who is change, but believed that FINRA should
members to vote using online and
elected by FINRA members based on telephonic methods in addition to paper increase the number of Public Members
their vote for a candidate.12 The Small ballots.17 on the NAC instead of adding an
Firm, Mid-Size Firm or Large Firm NAC The proposed rule change also additional Non-Industry Member to the
Member candidate receiving the largest amends Section 6.10 of the FINRA NAC.20 Finally, one commenter
number of votes from firms of Regulation By-Laws to simplify the expressed concerns about modifying the
corresponding size is declared the tabulation of ballots by the Independent composition of the NAC and
nominee, and the Nominating Agent, by eliminating the provision in lengthening the term of office of future
Committee sends a written certification Section 6.10 of the FINRA Regulation NAC members.21
of the results to the FINRA Board and By-Laws that permits NAC candidates A. Composition of the NAC
nominates such candidate for and their representatives to observe the
appointment to the NAC.13 Independent Agent’s accounting of Two commenters suggested that
The proposed rule change amends the ballots in contested NAC elections. The FINRA increase the number of Public
FINRA Regulation By-Laws in three proposed rule change would align the Members on the NAC.22 Specifically,
ways. First, it amends Section 5.2 of the ballot counting process used in NAC one commenter expressed concern that
FINRA Regulation By-Laws to expand while altering the NAC’s composition to
elections with the process used in
the size of the NAC from fourteen include a majority of Non-Industry
FINRA District Committee elections,
members to fifteen members and require
which does not provide candidates the Members would ‘‘enhance its reputation
that the NAC have more Non-Industry
ability to be present while the for impartiality and reduce the
Members, including at least three Public
Independent Agent opens and counts possibility of deadlock[,]’’persons with
Members, than Industry Members.
the ballots.18 The proposed rule change significant industry connections may
Accordingly, FINRA would add one
qualify as Non-Industry Members.23
Non-Industry Member seat to the
current 14-member committee.
15 See Proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws,
Similarly, another commenter believed
Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section that issuers and employees of issuers
Second, the proposed rule change 5.6(b) (Term of Office). The proposed rule change
lengthens the term of office of future also amends Section 5.6(a) of the FINRA Regulation who would be categorized as Non-
NAC members by one year, from three By-Laws to provide a three-year transitional period Industry Members ‘‘may be more closely
during which the FINRA Board may appoint new aligned with Industry Members under
to four years.14 In addition, the NAC NAC members to terms of office less than four years
to achieve the staggering necessary to divide the
certain circumstances.’’ 24 One
professional services to a self-regulatory NAC into four classes. FINRA anticipates that, commenter, however, raised concerns
organization registered under the Act. See FINRA beginning in January 2017, and ending in December about modifying the composition of the
Regulation By-Laws, Article I (Definitions), 2019, new NAC members would be appointed to
paragraph (x). terms of either three years or four years to achieve candidates and provided candidates no additional
10 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V the result of a NAC that is divided into four classes, grounds for recourse. Candidates and their
(National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.2(a) with each NAC member serving a term of four representatives are not allowed to see the vote of
(Number of Members and Qualifications). years. The proposed rule change also makes a any FINRA member and the final determination of
11 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article V conforming amendment to Section 5.6(b) of the the qualification of a ballot rests with the Secretary
(National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.3 FINRA Regulation By-Laws to delete obsolete text of the Corporation. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws,
(Appointments). related to a prior rule change that replaced region- Article VI (Selection of Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm
12 Id. based Industry NAC members with Industry and Large Firm Industry Members of the National
13 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VI members that represent FINRA member firms of Adjudicatory Council), Section 6.10 (General
(Selection of Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large various sizes. See Securities Exchange Act Release Procedures for Qualification and Accounting of
Firm Industry Members of the National No. 58909 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 68467 Ballots). FINRA noted that the Secretary of the
Adjudicatory Council), Section 6.13 (Certification of (November 18, 2008) (Order Approving File No. Corporation must still certify election results. See
Nomination). The FINRA Board is required to SR–FINRA–2008–046). FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VI (Selection of
16 The proposed rule change would also make a
appoint to the NAC the candidate who receives the Small Firm, Mid-Size Firm and Large Firm Industry
most votes in any contested election for a Small conforming amendment to Section 6.9 of the FINRA
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Members of the National Adjudicatory Council),
Firm, Mid-Size Firm or Large Firm NAC Member Regulation By-Laws concerning ballots that are Section 6.13 (Certification of Nomination).
seat. See FINRA Regulation By-Laws Article V returned as undelivered. 19 See Caruso Letter (recommending that the
(National Adjudicatory Council), Section 5.5 17 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII
proposed rule change be approved on an expedited
(Rejection of Nominating Committee Nominee). (District Committees), Section 8.11 (Ballots). basis).
14 See Proposed FINRA Regulation By-Laws, 18 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII
20 See Berman Letter and PIABA Letter.
Article V (National Adjudicatory Council), Section (District Committees), Section 8.14 (General 21 See FSI Letter.
5.6(a) and (c) (Term of Office). FINRA stated that Procedures for Qualification and Accounting of
22 See Berman Letter and PIABA Letter.
the proposed rule change would not alter or extend Ballots). According to FINRA, the opportunity to
23 See Berman Letter.
the term of any NAC member serving currently; the observe the Independent Agent’s qualification and
rule change would apply prospectively. accounting of ballots was rarely used by NAC 24 See PIABA Letter.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_41053/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Notices 40935
of the fifteen NAC members would For the Commission, by the Division of with the information necessary to
continue to be Industry Members, Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated determine, as required by the Act,
including two Small Firm NAC authority.44 whether the proposed rule change is
Members, one Mid-Size Firm NAC Robert W. Errett, consistent with the Act and the rules
Member, two Large Firm NAC Members, Deputy Secretary. thereunder. The information is used to
and two at-large Industry Members.40 [FR Doc. 2016–14837 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am] determine if the proposed rule change
Accordingly, the Commission believes BILLING CODE 8011–01–P should be approved, disapproved,
that the proposed rule change continues suspended, or if proceedings should be
to allow for substantial industry instituted to determine whether to
participation, while enhancing the SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE approve or disapprove the proposed
overall independence of the NAC. COMMISSION rule change.
The Commission also believes it is The respondents to the collection of
Proposed Collection; Comment information are SROs (as defined by
appropriate for FINRA to increase the Request
term of NAC members from three to four Section 3(a)(26) of the Act),1 including
years. While one commenter raised Upon Written Request, Copies Available national securities exchanges, national
concerns about extending member From: Securities and Exchange securities associations, registered
terms,41 the Commission believes that Commission, Office of FOIA Services, clearing agencies, notice registered
the proposed rule change will allow 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC securities future product exchanges, and
NAC members to spend more time 20549–2736. the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
serving and being fully productive after Extension: Board.
gaining experience on the NAC. At the Rule 19b–4 and Form 19b–4, SEC File No. In calendar year 2015, each
same time, the Commission believes the 270–38, OMB Control No. 3235–0045. respondent filed an average of
current term limits, staggered terms, and Notice is hereby given that pursuant approximately 57 proposed rule
composition of the NAC should to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 changes. Each filing takes
continue to provide the NAC with (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the approximately 39 hours to complete on
varied perspectives and views. Securities and Exchange Commission average. Thus, the total annual reporting
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments burden for filing proposed rule changes
The Commission also believes that the with the Commission is 86,697 hours
proposed changes to the NAC selection on the existing collection of information
provided for in Rule 19b–4 (17 CFR (57 proposals per year × 39 SROs × 39
process to modernize and streamline the hours per filing) for the estimated future
process and to align it with the process 240.19b–4), under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) (15 U.S.C. number of 39 SROs.2 In addition to
used in FINRA District Committee filing their proposed rule changes with
elections are appropriate.42 The 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of the Commission, the respondents also
proposed rule change would allow are required to post each of their
ballots to be delivered and voted by information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for proposals on their respective Web sites,
means other than the mail and further a process that takes approximately four
simplify the tabulation process by extension and approval.
Section 19(b) of the Act (15 U.S.C. hours to complete per proposal. Thus,
eliminating the provision that allowed for 1,935 proposals, the total annual
NAC candidates and their 78s(b)) requires each self-regulatory
organization (‘‘SRO’’) to file with the reporting burden on respondents to post
representatives to observe the the proposals on their Web sites is 7,740
Independent Agent’s accounting of Commission copies of any proposed
rule, or any proposed change in, hours (1,935 proposals per year × 4
ballots in a contested election. FINRA hours per filing) or 8,892 hours (57
stated that candidates rarely opted to addition to, or deletion from the rules of
such SRO. Rule 19b–4 implements the proposals per year × 39 SROs × 4 hours
observe the Independent Agent and per filing) for the estimated future
observing the Independent Agent did requirements of Section 19(b) by
requiring the SROs to file their proposed number of 39 SROs. Further, the
not provide candidates additional respondents are required to update their
grounds for recourse. NAC candidates rule changes on Form 19b–4 and by
clarifying which actions taken by SROs rulebooks, which they maintain on their
and their representatives were not Web sites, to reflect the changes that
allowed to see the vote of any FINRA are subject to the filing requirement set
forth in Section 19(b). Rule 19b–4(n) they make in each proposal they file.
member and the final determination of Thus, for all filings that were not
the qualification of a ballot rested with requires a designated clearing agency to
provide the Commission advance notice withdrawn by a respondent (240
the Secretary of FINRA. withdrawn filings in calendar year
(‘‘Advance Notice’’) of any proposed
V. Conclusion change to its rules, procedures, or 2015) or disapproved by the
operations that could materially affect Commission (6 disapproved filings in
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to calendar year 2015), the respondents
the nature or level of risks presented by
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,43 that the were required to update their online
such clearing agency. Rule 19b–4(o)
proposed rule change (FINRA–2016– rulebooks to reflect the effectiveness of
requires a registered clearing agency to
014) be, and it hereby is approved. 1,689 proposals, each of which takes
submit for a Commission determination
any security-based swap, or any group, approximately four hours to complete
40 See current and proposed FINRA Regulation
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By-Laws, Article V (National Adjudicatory
category, type, or class of security-based 1 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26).
Council), Section 5.2(a) (Number of Members and swaps it plans to accept for clearing 2 For most of 2015, 34 SROs were registered. One
Qualifications). (‘‘Security-Based Swap Submission’’), registered SRO withdrew in December 2015 and
41 See FSI Letter.
and provide notice to its members of one SRO newly registered with the Commission in
42 See FINRA Regulation By-Laws, Article VIII
such submissions. January 2016. The Commission expects five
(District Committees), Sections 8.11 (Ballots), 8.13 additional respondents to register during the three-
(Ballots Returned as Undelivered), and 8.14
The collection of information is
year period for which this PRA Extension is
(General Procedures for Qualification and designed to provide the Commission applicable (three as registered clearing agencies and
Accounting of Ballots). two as national securities exchanges), bringing the
43 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 44 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). total number of respondents to 39.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:24 Jun 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_41053/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:41:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:41:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 40932 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR