| Page Range | 41255-41257 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14912 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 41255-41257] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14912] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Proposed Rules [[Page 41255]] OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 532 RIN 3206-AN38 Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas for pay-setting purposes. Based on recent reviews of Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) boundaries in a number of wage areas, OPM proposes redefinitions affecting the following wage areas: Salinas-Monterey, CA; San Francisco, CA; New London, CT; Central and Western Massachusetts; Cincinnati, OH: Dayton, OH, Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon; and Spokane, WA. DATES: We must receive comments on or before July 25, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN 3206-AN38,'' using any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Brenda L. Roberts, Deputy Associate Director for Pay and Leave, Employee Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200. Email: [email protected]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at (202) 606-2838 or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OPM is issuing a proposed rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund FWS wage areas. These changes are based on recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the statutory national labor- management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted. OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS wage area boundaries: (i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; (ii) Commuting patterns; and (iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting MSAs for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs and maintains and updates the definitions of MSA boundaries following each decennial census. MSAs are composed of counties and are defined on the basis of a central urbanized area--a contiguous area of relatively high population density. Additional surrounding counties are included in MSAs if they have strong social and economic ties to central counties. When the boundaries of wage areas were first established in the 1960s, there were fewer MSAs than there are today and the boundaries of the then existing MSAs were much smaller. Most MSAs were contained within the boundaries of a wage area. MSAs have expanded each decade and in some cases now extend beyond the boundaries of the wage area. FPRAC recently reviewed several wage areas where boundaries subdivide certain MSAs and has recommended by consensus that OPM implement the changes described in this proposed rule. These changes would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA San Benito and Santa Clara Counties, CA, comprise the San Jose- Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA. The San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara MSA is split between the Salinas-Monterey, CA, wage area and the San Francisco, CA, wage area. San Benito County is part of the Salinas- Monterey area of application while Santa Clara County is part of the San Francisco survey area. OPM proposes to redefine San Benito County to the San Francisco area of application so that the entire San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA is in one wage area. There are currently 15 FWS employees stationed in San Benito County. Worcester, MA-CT MSA Windham County, CT, and Worcester County, MA, comprise the Worcester, MA-CT MSA. The Worcester MSA is split between the New London, CT, wage area and the Central and Western Massachusetts, MA, wage area. Windham County is part of the New London area of application and Worcester County is part of the Central and Western Massachusetts area of application, except that the towns of Warren and West Warren in Worcester County are part of the Central and Western Massachusetts survey area and the towns of Blackstone and Millville in Worcester County are part of the Narragansett Bay, RI, survey area. OPM proposes to redefine Windham County to the Central and Western Massachusetts area of application so that the entire Worcester, MA-CT MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS employees stationed in Windham County. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN MSA Dearborn, Ohio, and Union Counties, IN; Boone, Bracken, Campbell, Gallatin, Grant, Kenton, and Pendleton Counties, KY; and Brown, Butler, Clermont, Hamilton, and Warren Counties, OH, comprise the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN MSA. The Cincinnati MSA is split between the Cincinnati, OH, wage area and the Dayton, OH, wage area. Dearborn County, IN; Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties, KY; and Clermont, Hamilton, and Warren Counties, OH, are part of the Cincinnati survey area. Ohio County, IN; Bracken, Gallatin, Grant, and Pendleton Counties, KY; and Brown and Butler Counties, OH, are part of the Cincinnati area of application. Union County is part of the Dayton area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Union County to the Cincinnati area of [[Page 41256]] application so that the entire Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS employees stationed in Union County. Walla Walla, WA MSA Columbia and Walla Walla Counties, WA, comprise the Walla Walla, WA MSA. The Walla Walla MSA is split between the Southeastern Washington- Eastern Oregon wage area and the Spokane, WA, wage area. Walla Walla County is part of the Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon survey area and Columbia County is part of the Spokane area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Columbia County to the Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon area of application so that the entire Walla Walla, WA MSA is in one wage area. There are currently three FWS employees stationed in Columbia County. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Beth F. Cobert, Acting Director. Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS 0 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas 0 2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listings for the Salinas-Monterey, CA; San Francisco, CA; New London, CT; Central and Western Massachusetts; Cincinnati, OH: Dayton, OH, Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon; and Spokane, WA, wage areas to read as follows: * * * * * CALIFORNIA * * * * * Salinas-Monterey Survey Area California: Monterey Area of Application. Survey area. * * * * * San Francisco California: Alameda Contra Costa Marin Napa San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara Solano Area of Application. Survey area plus: California: Mendocino San Benito Santa Cruz Sonoma * * * * * CONNECTICUT * * * * * New London Survey Area Connecticut: New London Area of Application. Survey area. * * * * * MASSACHUSETTS * * * * * Central and Western Massachusetts Survey Area Massachusetts The following cities and towns in: Hampden County Agawam Chicopee East Longmeadow Feeding Hills Hampden Holyoke Longmeadow Ludlow Monson Palmer Southwick Springfield Three Rivers Westfield West Springfield Wilbraham Hampshire County Easthampton Granby Hadley Northampton South Hadley Worcester County Warren West Warren Area of Application. Survey area plus: Connecticut: Windham Massachusetts: Berkshire Franklin Worcester (except Blackstone and Millville) The following cities and towns in: Hampden County Blandford Brimfield Chester Granville Holland Montgomery Russell Tolland Wales Hampshire County Amherst Belchertown Chesterfield Cummington Goshen Hatfield Huntington Middlefield Pelham Plainfield Southampton Ware Westhampton Williamsburg Worthington Middlesex County Ashby Shirley Townsend New Hampshire: Belknap Carroll Cheshire Grafton Hillsborough Merrimack Sullivan Vermont: Addison Bennington Caledonia Essex Lamoille Orange Orleans Rutland Washington Windham Windsor * * * * * OHIO Cincinnati Survey Area Indiana: Dearborn Kentucky: Boone Campbell Kenton Ohio: Clermont Hamilton Warren Area of Application. Survey area plus: Indiana: Franklin Ohio Ripley [[Page 41257]] Switzerland Union Kentucky: Bracken Carroll Gallatin Grant Mason Pendleton Ohio: Adams Brown Butler Highland * * * * * Dayton Ohio: Champaign Clark Greene Miami Montgomery Preble Area of Application. Survey area plus: Indiana: Randolph Wayne Ohio: Auglaize Clinton Darke Logan Shelby * * * * * WASHINGTON * * * * * Southeastern Washington-Eastern Oregon Survey Area Oregon: Umatilla Washington: Benton Franklin Walla Walla Yakima Area of Application. Survey area plus: Oregon: Baker Grant Harney Malheur Morrow Union Wallowa Wheeler Washington: Columbia Kittitas (Only includes the Yakima Firing Range portion) Spokane Survey Area Washington: Spokane Area of Application. Survey area plus: Idaho: Benewah Bonner Boundary Clearwater Idaho Kootenai Latah Lewis Nez Perce Shoshone Washington: Adams Asotin Chelan (Does not include the North Cascades National Park portion) Douglas Ferry Garfield Grant Kittitas (Does not include the Yakima Firing Range portion) Lincoln Okanogan Pend Oreille Stevens Whitman * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-14912 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule with request for comments. | |
| Dates | We must receive comments on or before July 25, 2016. | |
| Contact | Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at (202) 606-2838 or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 41255 | |
| RIN Number | 3206-AN38 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Freedom of Information; Government Employees; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Wages |