81 FR 41283 - Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permit Program Revision; New Jersey

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 122 (June 24, 2016)

Page Range		41283-41284
FR Document		2016-15004

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the New Jersey title V Operating Permit Program requested by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) on May 15, 2015. NJDEP adopted a rule revision on December 29, 2014, to change the fee schedule for certain permitting activities for major facilities, including application fees for significant modifications and fees to authorize general operating permit registration and operation of used oil space heaters. The adopted rule took effect on February 27, 2015. NJDEP submitted a request to EPA to incorporate the revised fee schedule into its Operating Permit Program. EPA proposes to approve the requested change as a revision to the NJOPP.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41283-41284]
From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15004]

[[Page 41283]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[EPA-R02-OAR-2015-0837; FRL-9948-31-Region 2]

Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permit Program Revision; New
Jersey

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the New Jersey title V Operating Permit Program
requested by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
(NJDEP) on May 15, 2015. NJDEP adopted a rule revision on December 29,
2014, to change the fee schedule for certain permitting activities for
major facilities, including application fees for significant
modifications and fees to authorize general operating permit
registration and operation of used oil space heaters. The adopted rule
took effect on February 27, 2015. NJDEP submitted a request to EPA to
incorporate the revised fee schedule into its Operating Permit Program.
EPA proposes to approve the requested change as a revision to the
NJOPP.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R02-
OAR-2015-0837, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Suilin Chan, Air Programs Branch,
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York,
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4019.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section provides additional information
by addressing the following items:

I. Background

EPA granted full approval of the New Jersey title V Operating
Permit Program on December 5, 2001 (66 FR 63168). The New Jersey
Operating Permit Program (NJOPP) is implemented through its Operating
Permits Rule codified at Subchapter 22 of Chapter 27 of Title 7 of the
New Jersey Administrative Code (N.J.A.C. 7:27-22). As mandated by title
V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as well as its implementing regulations
found in part 70 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR
part 70), an approved State must establish a fee schedule that results
in the collection and retention of revenues sufficient to cover the
direct and indirect costs of implementing the State's operating permit
program. NJDEP periodically adjusts the title V fee schedule stipulated
at N.J.A.C. 7:27-22 to ensure that the NJOPP is adequately funded by
fees collected from subject sources. EPA's evaluation of New Jersey's
title V fee program during a program audit conducted in 2012 showed
that the fees collected by New Jersey were insufficient to cover the
costs of administering the NJOPP. The NJOPP has a deficit carried over
year after year that accumulated to $7.5 million dollars as of fiscal
year (FY) 2011. As of FY 2014, the cumulative shortfall was over $10
million dollars. New Jersey is required to resolve the funding issue by
taking all necessary actions.

II. Summary of Program Revision

On December 29, 2014, New Jersey finalized rule revisions to amend
certain fee provisions for major facilities in its Operating Permits
Rule, codified at N.J.A.C. 7:27-22. For significant modifications,
NJDEP charges major facilities base fees for straightforward
applications and adds supplementary fees for more complex applications.
The prior fee schedules for significant modifications were found at
N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.31(r), (s), (v) and (w). These provisions expired on
December 29, 2014 and have now been deleted. New Jersey's revision
replaces these provisions with a new Base Fee Schedule and
Supplementary Fee Schedule for significant modifications, found at
N.J.A.C 7:27-22.31(y) and N.J.A.C 7:27-22.31(z) respectively.
New Jersey's revision also updated the fee schedule for a major
facility's registration under a General Operating Permit and
authorization to operate a used oil space heater. The prior fee
schedule for these actions was located at N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.31(t) and
(x) and expired on December 29, 2014. New Jersey's revision deletes
those provisions and replaces them with a new fee schedule at N.J.A.C.
7:27-22.31(aa).
Finally, New Jersey's revision updates other provisions of the
Operating Permits Rule to reflect references to the new fee schedules
rather than the prior now-deleted provisions, including at N.J.A.C.
7:27-22.1 (definition of ``probe'') and N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.31(a)(6), (e),
(k)(1), (k)(2), (p) and (u)(4), (5), (7), and (9). For details of New
Jersey's revision of its Operating Permits Rule, please refer to the
public docket.
New Jersey has found that these increases in fees are necessary to
provide additional funding to help reduce the deficit for the NJOPP,
and the rule changes effectuating the increases have undergone the
State's complete rulemaking process. On May 15, 2015, NJDEP submitted a
request that these revisions to its Operating Permits Rule be
incorporated into New Jersey's Operating Permit Program as a program
revision, in accordance with 40 CFR 70.4(i).\1\ This proposed rule
would grant that request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ In the same document, NJDEP submitted rule revisions related
to minor facilities fees found at N.J.A.C. 7:27-8 as a SIP
submittal. This SIP submittal will be addressed in a separate
rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

The State of New Jersey has adopted rule revisions to increase the
base and supplementary fees for significant modifications at major
facilities, at N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.31(y) and (z), and registration fees
for major facilities' use of General Operating Permits and
authorization to operate used oil space heaters at N.J.A.C. 7:27-
22.31(aa). The rule revisions also deleted outdated fee provisions at
7:27-22.31(r)-(t) and (v)-(x) and updated cross-references found in
N.J.A.C. 7:27-22.1 (definition of ``probe'') and N.J.A.C. 7:27-
22.31(a)(6), (e), (k)(1), (k)(2), (p) and (u)(4), (5), (7), and (9).
The rule revisions were adopted in accordance with the state's
rulemaking procedures on December 29, 2014. The rule changes are
necessary to increase fee revenues to fund the NJOPP. The requirement
that revenues collected from sources subject to a state's Operating
Permits Program provide funding sufficient to cover the permit
program's costs is mandated by

[[Page 41284]]

title V of the CAA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR 70.9. In
today's action, pursuant to 40 CFR 70.4(i)(2), EPA is proposing to
approve NJDEP's May 15, 2015 request to incorporate New Jersey's
Operating Permits Rule (N.J.A.C. 7:27-22) as revised on December 29,
2014 as a revision to New Jersey's Operating Permit Program. EPA is
soliciting public comments on EPA's proposed action to incorporate the
revised rule into the NJOPP. These comments will be considered before
taking final action.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
This proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as
meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). It also does not provide EPA
with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate,
disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements
under State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty
beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Act.
This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), 15 U.S.C. 272 note, requires Federal agencies to
use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus to carry out policy objectives, so long as such standards are
not inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impracticable. In
reviewing State Operating Permit Programs submitted pursuant to title V
of the Clean Air Act, EPA will approve such regulations provided that
they meet the requirements of the CAA and EPA's regulations codified at
40 CFR part 70. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove such regulations for failure to use
VCS. It would, thus, be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when
it reviews such regulations, to use VCS in place of a State regulation
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA do not apply.
This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: June 14, 2016.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2016-15004 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Proposed Rules 41283

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: New Jersey’s revision also updated
AGENCY Suilin Chan, Air Programs Branch, the fee schedule for a major facility’s
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 registration under a General Operating
40 CFR Part 70 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New Permit and authorization to operate a
York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4019. used oil space heater. The prior fee
[EPA–R02–OAR–2015–0837; FRL–9948–31– schedule for these actions was located at
Region 2] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
section provides additional information N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.31(t) and (x) and
Clean Air Act Title V Operating Permit by addressing the following items: expired on December 29, 2014. New
Program Revision; New Jersey Jersey’s revision deletes those
I. Background provisions and replaces them with a
AGENCY: Environmental Protection EPA granted full approval of the New new fee schedule at N.J.A.C. 7:27–
Agency (EPA). Jersey title V Operating Permit Program 22.31(aa).
ACTION: Proposed rule. on December 5, 2001 (66 FR 63168). The Finally, New Jersey’s revision updates
New Jersey Operating Permit Program other provisions of the Operating
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Permits Rule to reflect references to the
(NJOPP) is implemented through its
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a new fee schedules rather than the prior
Operating Permits Rule codified at
revision to the New Jersey title V now-deleted provisions, including at
Subchapter 22 of Chapter 27 of Title 7
Operating Permit Program requested by N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.1 (definition of
of the New Jersey Administrative Code
the New Jersey Department of ‘‘probe’’) and N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.31(a)(6),
(N.J.A.C. 7:27–22). As mandated by title
Environmental Protection (NJDEP) on (e), (k)(1), (k)(2), (p) and (u)(4), (5), (7),
V of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as well as
May 15, 2015. NJDEP adopted a rule and (9). For details of New Jersey’s
its implementing regulations found in
revision on December 29, 2014, to revision of its Operating Permits Rule,
part 70 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal
change the fee schedule for certain please refer to the public docket.
Regulations (40 CFR part 70), an New Jersey has found that these
permitting activities for major facilities, approved State must establish a fee
including application fees for significant increases in fees are necessary to
schedule that results in the collection provide additional funding to help
modifications and fees to authorize and retention of revenues sufficient to
general operating permit registration reduce the deficit for the NJOPP, and
cover the direct and indirect costs of the rule changes effectuating the
and operation of used oil space heaters. implementing the State’s operating
The adopted rule took effect on increases have undergone the State’s
permit program. NJDEP periodically complete rulemaking process. On May
February 27, 2015. NJDEP submitted a adjusts the title V fee schedule
request to EPA to incorporate the 15, 2015, NJDEP submitted a request
stipulated at N.J.A.C. 7:27–22 to ensure that these revisions to its Operating
revised fee schedule into its Operating that the NJOPP is adequately funded by
Permit Program. EPA proposes to Permits Rule be incorporated into New
fees collected from subject sources. Jersey’s Operating Permit Program as a
approve the requested change as a EPA’s evaluation of New Jersey’s title V
revision to the NJOPP. program revision, in accordance with 40
fee program during a program audit CFR 70.4(i).1 This proposed rule would
DATES: Comments must be received on conducted in 2012 showed that the fees grant that request.
or before July 25, 2016. collected by New Jersey were
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, insufficient to cover the costs of III. Proposed Action
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R02– administering the NJOPP. The NJOPP The State of New Jersey has adopted
OAR–2015–0837, at http:// has a deficit carried over year after year rule revisions to increase the base and
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online that accumulated to $7.5 million dollars supplementary fees for significant
instructions for submitting comments. as of fiscal year (FY) 2011. As of FY modifications at major facilities, at
Once submitted, comments cannot be 2014, the cumulative shortfall was over N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.31(y) and (z), and
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. $10 million dollars. New Jersey is registration fees for major facilities’ use
The EPA may publish any comment required to resolve the funding issue by of General Operating Permits and
received to its public docket. Do not taking all necessary actions. authorization to operate used oil space
submit electronically any information heaters at N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.31(aa). The
II. Summary of Program Revision
you consider to be Confidential rule revisions also deleted outdated fee
Business Information (CBI) or other On December 29, 2014, New Jersey provisions at 7:27–22.31(r)–(t) and (v)–
information whose disclosure is finalized rule revisions to amend certain (x) and updated cross-references found
restricted by statute. Multimedia fee provisions for major facilities in its in N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.1 (definition of
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Operating Permits Rule, codified at ‘‘probe’’) and N.J.A.C. 7:27–22.31(a)(6),
accompanied by a written comment. N.J.A.C. 7:27–22. For significant (e), (k)(1), (k)(2), (p) and (u)(4), (5), (7),
The written comment is considered the modifications, NJDEP charges major and (9). The rule revisions were adopted
official comment and should include facilities base fees for straightforward in accordance with the state’s
discussion of all points you wish to applications and adds supplementary rulemaking procedures on December 29,
make. The EPA will generally not fees for more complex applications. The 2014. The rule changes are necessary to
consider comments or comment prior fee schedules for significant increase fee revenues to fund the
contents located outside of the primary modifications were found at N.J.A.C. NJOPP. The requirement that revenues
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 7:27–22.31(r), (s), (v) and (w). These collected from sources subject to a
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

other file sharing system). For provisions expired on December 29, state’s Operating Permits Program
additional submission methods, the full 2014 and have now been deleted. New provide funding sufficient to cover the
EPA public comment policy, Jersey’s revision replaces these permit program’s costs is mandated by
information about CBI or multimedia provisions with a new Base Fee
1 In the same document, NJDEP submitted rule
submissions, and general guidance on Schedule and Supplementary Fee
revisions related to minor facilities fees found at
making effective comments, please visit Schedule for significant modifications, N.J.A.C. 7:27–8 as a SIP submittal. This SIP
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ found at N.J.A.C 7:27–22.31(y) and submittal will be addressed in a separate
commenting-epa-dockets. N.J.A.C 7:27–22.31(z) respectively. rulemaking.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:15 Jun 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JNP1.SGM 24JNP1

41284 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 122 / Friday, June 24, 2016 / Proposed Rules

title V of the CAA and its implementing National Government and the States, or ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
regulations at 40 CFR 70.9. In today’s on the distribution of power and AGENCY
action, pursuant to 40 CFR 70.4(i)(2), responsibilities among the various
EPA is proposing to approve NJDEP’s levels of government, as specified in 40 CFR Parts 271 and 272
May 15, 2015 request to incorporate Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, [EPA–R08–RCRA–2016–0174; FRL–9947–
New Jersey’s Operating Permits Rule August 10, 1999). This action merely 05–Region 8]
(N.J.A.C. 7:27–22) as revised on proposes to approve a state rule
December 29, 2014 as a revision to New implementing a Federal standard, and Wyoming: Proposed Authorization of
Jersey’s Operating Permit Program. EPA does not alter the relationship or the State Hazardous Waste Management
is soliciting public comments on EPA’s distribution of power and Program Revisions and Incorporation
proposed action to incorporate the by Reference
responsibilities established in the Act.
revised rule into the NJOPP. These
comments will be considered before This proposed rule also is not subject AGENCY: Environmental Protection
taking final action. to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Agency (EPA).
Children from Environmental Health ACTION: Proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
Reviews SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
April 23, 1997), because it is not
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR Agency (EPA) is proposing to grant
economically significant.
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed authorization to the State of Wyoming
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Section 12(d) of the National for the changes to its hazardous waste
action’’ and therefore is not subject to Technology Transfer and Advancement program under the Solid Waste Disposal
review by the Office of Management and Act of 1995 (NTTAA), 15 U.S.C. 272 Act, as amended, commonly referred to
Budget. For this reason, this action is note, requires Federal agencies to use as the Resource Conservation and
also not subject to Executive Order technical standards that are developed Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations or adopted by voluntary consensus to determined that these changes satisfy all
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, carry out policy objectives, so long as requirements needed to qualify for final
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May such standards are not inconsistent with authorization, and is authorizing the
22, 2001). applicable law or otherwise state’s changes through a direct final
This proposed action merely proposes impracticable. In reviewing State action. In addition, the EPA is
to approve State law as meeting Federal Operating Permit Programs submitted proposing to codify in the regulations
requirements and imposes no additional pursuant to title V of the Clean Air Act, entitled ‘‘Approved State Hazardous
requirements beyond those imposed by EPA will approve such regulations Waste Management Programs,’’
State law. Accordingly, the provided that they meet the Wyoming’s authorized hazardous waste
Administrator certifies that this requirements of the CAA and EPA’s program. The EPA will incorporate by
proposed rule will not have a significant regulations codified at 40 CFR part 70. reference into the Code of Federal
economic impact on a substantial Regulations (CFR) those provisions of
In this context, in the absence of a prior
number of small entities under the the State regulations that are authorized
existing requirement for the State to use
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 and that the EPA will enforce under
voluntary consensus standards (VCS), RCRA.
et seq.). It also does not provide EPA
with the discretionary authority to EPA has no authority to disapprove
such regulations for failure to use VCS. DATES: Send written comments by July
address, as appropriate, 25, 2016.
disproportionate human health or It would, thus, be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
environmental effects, using practicable
such regulations, to use VCS in place of identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
and legally permissible methods, under
a State regulation that otherwise RCRA–2016–0174 by mail to Christina
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Cosentini, Resource Conservation and
February 16, 1994).
Act. Thus, the requirements of section Recovery Program, EPA Region 8, 1595
Because this rule proposes to approve
12(d) of the NTTAA do not apply. Wynkoop Street, Mail Code 8P–R,
pre-existing requirements under State
Denver, Colorado 80202. You may also
law and does not impose any additional This proposed rule does not impose submit comments electronically or
enforceable duty beyond that required an information collection burden under through hand delivery/courier by
by State law, it does not contain any the provisions of the Paperwork following the detailed instructions in
unfunded mandate or significantly or Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
uniquely affect small governments, as
et seq.). rule located in the Rules section of this
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Federal Register.
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
This proposed rule also does not have FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tribal implications because it will not Environmental protection, Christina Cosentini at (303) 312–6231,
have a substantial direct effect on one or Administrative practice and procedure, cosentini.christina@epa.gov.
more Indian tribes, on the relationship Air pollution control, Intergovernmental SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
between the Federal Government and relations, Operating permits, Reporting ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of and recordkeeping requirements. Federal Register, the EPA is authorizing
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

power and responsibilities between the Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
changes to the Wyoming program, in
Federal Government and Indian tribes, addition to codifying and incorporating
as specified by Executive Order 13175 Dated: June 14, 2016. by reference the State’s hazardous waste
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Judith A. Enck, program as a direct final rule. The EPA
This action also does not have Regional Administrator, Region 2. did not make a proposal prior to the
federalism implications because it does [FR Doc. 2016–15004 Filed 6–23–16; 8:45 am] direct final rule because we believe
not have substantial direct effects on the these actions are not controversial and
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
States, on the relationship between the do not expect comments that oppose

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:15 Jun 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\24JNP1.SGM 24JNP1

Document Created: 2016-06-24 00:52:49
Document Modified: 2016-06-24 00:52:49

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Proposed rule.
Dates		Comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016.
Contact		Suilin Chan, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-4019.
FR Citation		81 FR 41283
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Air Pollution Control; Intergovernmental Relations; Operating Permits and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements