| Page Range | 41364-41368 | |
| FR Document | 2016-14933 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 41364-41368] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-14933] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-78106; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Adopting New NYSE MKT Rules 2090--Equities (Know Your Customer) and 2111--Equities (Suitability) That Are Substantially Similar to FINRA Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability), Deleting Current NYSE MKT Rule 405--Equities (Diligence as to Accounts), and Making Other Conforming Changes June 20, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that on June 9, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a. \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes adopting new rule text that is substantially similar to Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and 2111 (Suitability) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), (2) deleting current Rule 405--Equities (Diligence as to Accounts) (``Rule 405''), and (3) making other conforming changes. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to harmonize with certain FINRA rules. Specifically, the Exchange proposes (1) adopting new rule text that is substantially similar to FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111; (2) deleting Rule 405; \4\ and (3) making other conforming changes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ References to rules are to NYSE MKT rules unless otherwise indicated. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background In 2007, FINRA and the Exchange's affiliate the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') \5\ entered into an [[Page 41365]] agreement (the ``Agreement'') pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act to reduce regulatory duplication by allocating to FINRA certain regulatory responsibilities for NYSE rules and rule interpretations (``FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules'').\6\ NYSE MKT became a party to the Agreement effective December 15, 2008.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ NYSE Regulation, Inc., a former not-for-profit subsidiary of the NYSE, was also a party to the Agreement by virtue of the fact that it performed regulatory functions for the NYSE pursuant to a delegation agreement. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251, 11264-65 (March 6, 2006) (SR-NYSE- 2005-77) (approving delegation agreement). NYSE Regulation also performed regulatory services for the Exchange pursuant to an intercompany Regulatory Services Agreement (``RSA'') that gave the Exchange the contractual right to review NYSE Regulation's performance. The delegation agreement and related RSA terminated on February 16, 2016, and NYSE Regulation has ceased providing regulatory services to the Exchange, which has re-integrated its regulatory functions. \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement); 56147 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007- 054) (order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as ``Common Rules''). Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement sets forth procedures regarding proposed changes by FINRA or the Exchange to the substance of any of the Common Rules. \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement); 56147 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007- 054) (order approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as ``Common Rules''); 60409 (July 30, 2009), 74 FR 39353 (August 6, 2009) (order approving the amended and restated Agreement, adding NYSE MKT LLC as a party). Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement sets forth procedures regarding proposed changes by FINRA, NYSE or NYSE MKT to the substance of any of the Common Rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to reduce regulatory duplication and relieve firms that are members of the Exchange, the NYSE and FINRA of conflicting or unnecessary regulatory burdens, FINRA has been reviewing and amending the NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules in order to create a consolidated FINRA rulebook.\8\ As part of the rule consolidation process, in 2010, FINRA harmonized NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules and interpretations concerning know your customer and suitability.\9\ In its filing, FINRA (1) adopted FINRA Rules 2090 (Know Your Customer) and 2090 (Suitability), and (2) deleted NASD Rule 2310 (Recommendations to Customers (Suitability)) and NYSE Rule 405 (Diligence as to Accounts) as well as NYSE Rule Interpretations 405/01 through/04. The rule change was effective July 9, 2012.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ FINRA's rulebook currently has three sets of rules: (1) NASD Rules, (2) FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules, and (3) consolidated FINRA Rules. The FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to those members of FINRA that are also members of the NYSE (``Dual Members''), while the consolidated FINRA Rules apply to all FINRA members. For more information about the FINRA rulebook consolidation process, see FINRA Information Notice, March 12, 2008. \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63325 ((November 17, 2010), 75 FR 71479 (November 23, 2010) (SR-FINRA-2010-039) (``FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval''). \10\ See FINRA Regulatory Notice 11-25 (May 2011). The original effective date was October 7, 2011. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently, the Exchange does not have separate rules for know your customer and suitability. Rather, Rule 405, based on NYSE Rule 405,\11\ requires every member organization, through a principal executive or a person or persons designated under the provisions of Rule 3110(a), to take certain actions relative to customers and customer accounts. First, Rule 405(1) requires member organizations to use ``due diligence'' to learn the ``essential facts relative to every customer, every order, every cash or margin account accepted or carried by such organization and every person holding power of attorney over any account accepted or carried by such organization.'' Second, Rule 405(2) requires member organizations to supervise diligently all accounts handled by registered representatives. Finally, Rule 405(3) requires persons designated by the member to be informed of the essential facts relative to the customer and to the nature of the proposed account prior to approving the opening of the account. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ The NYSE recently made a similar filing to delete Rule 405 and its related interpretations and adopt new NYSE Rules 2090 and 2111 based on FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77838 (May 16, 2016), 81 FR 31974 (May 20, 2016) (SR- NYSE-2016-33). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Supplementary Material .10 of Rule 405 generally discusses the requirements that firms know their customers and imposes specific knowledge and due diligence requirements in connection with the authority of third parties to act on behalf of customers that are legal entities, including margin accounts carried by a member organization for a non-member corporation, cash accounts carried for a non-member corporation, and agency accounts carried by a member organization.\12\ Supplementary Material .20 of Rule 405 refers to the requirements of Rule 4311 concerning the permitted allocation of responsibilities between introducing and carrying organizations. Supplementary Material .30 cross references to Rule 414 (Index and Currency Warrants).\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ As discussed below, the Exchange believes that Supplementary Material .10 of Rule 405--Equities is redundant of proposed Rule 2090 and proposed Supplementary Material .01 thereof that would require firms to know the essential facts concerning every customer. \13\ NYSE Rule 414 provides that Rule 723 (Suitability) applies to recommendations in currency warrants, currency index warrants and stock index warrants. When the Exchange adopted the NYSE's rules in 2008, however, NYSE Rule 414 was not adopted. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58265 (July 30, 2008), 73 FR 46075, 46078 (August 7, 2008) (SR-Amex-2008-63). The Exchange believes that the other cross references in Rule 405 are either no longer necessary or moot. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to delete current Rule 405 as either duplicative of, or not aligned with, the proposed know your customer and suitability requirements discussed below, and adopt the text of FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ The technical and conforming changes are that the Exchange would (1) substitute the term ``member organization'' for ``member'' (see note 18, infra), (2) substitute the term ``Exchange'' for ``FINRA,'' (3) change certain cross-references to FINRA rules to cross-references to Exchange rules, and (4) add references to proposed Rules 2090--Equities and 2111--Equities in Rule 3170 (Tape Recording of Registered Persons by Certain Firms). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 2090--Equities (Know Your Customer) Like FINRA Rule 2090, proposed Rule 2090--Equities (``Rule 2090'') would encompass the ``main ethical standard'' of Rule 405(1).\15\ The proposed rule would require every ``member organization through a principal executive or a person or persons designated under the provisions of Rule 3110(a)'' \16\ to use ``reasonable diligence,'' with regard to the opening and maintenance of every account, in order to know and retain the essential facts concerning every customer. The proposed supplementary material would define ``essential facts'' as those ``required to (a) effectively service the customer's account, (b) act in accordance with any special handling instructions for the account, (c) understand the authority of each person acting on behalf of the customer, and (d) comply with applicable laws, regulations, and rules.'' \17\ The proposed rule would be identical to FINRA Rule 2090 except that the proposed rule would use the term ``member organization'' rather than ``member,'' which has different meanings under FINRA and Exchange rules.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71480. \16\ This is the current formulation in Rule 405, which the Exchange proposes to retain. \17\ See Proposed Rule 2090.01. Like FINRA, the Exchange does not propose to incorporate the requirement in NYSE Rule 405(1) to learn the essential facts relative to ``every order.'' The Exchange agrees with FINRA that the application of existing order-handling rules renders this formulation unnecessary. See FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71480. Further, the Exchange's proposed suitability rule would also require member organizations and persons associated with a member organization to use reasonable diligence to understand the securities and strategies they recommend, further obviating the need for this language. See id. \18\ Under FINRA Rules, a ``member'' means individual, partnership, corporation or other legal entity admitted to membership in FINRA under Articles III and IV of the FINRA By-Laws. See FINRA Rule 0160(b)(10). Article III, Sec. 1(a) generally limits membership to registered brokers, dealers, municipal securities brokers or dealers, or government securities brokers or dealers. NYSE MKT's equivalent term is ``member organization.'' See Rule 2(b)(i)--Equities (defining ``member organization'' as a registered broker or dealer (unless exempt pursuant to the Act) that is a member of FINRA or another registered securities exchange). Under Rule 2(a)--Equities, the term ``member'' means a natural person associated with a member organization who has been approved by the Exchange and designated by such member organization to effect transactions on the floor of the Exchange or any facility thereof. A ``member'' is not a registered broker-dealer and does not have employees; only member organizations have employees. For purposes of the proposed amendments to its disciplinary rules, the Exchange proposes to continue using the phrase ``covered person'' to indicate employees of a member organization. As noted below, for purposes of the proposed change, the Exchange proposes to continue using the phrase ``person associated with a member organization'' to indicate employees of a member organization for purposes of proposed Rule 2111. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 41366]] Proposed Rule 2111--Equities (Suitability) Proposed Rule 2111--Equities (``Rule 2111''), like its FINRA counterpart, would require a member organization or person associated with a member organization \19\ to have a ``reasonable basis'' to believe that a recommended transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities is suitable for the customer. This assessment would be based on the information obtained through the reasonable diligence of the member organization or person associated with a member organization to ascertain the customer's investment profile, which includes, but is not limited to, the customer's age, other investments, financial situation and needs, tax status, investment objectives, investment experience, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and any other information the customer may disclose to the member organization or person associated with a member organization in connection with such recommendation.\20\ Like the FINRA rule, the proposed Rule would explicitly cover a recommended investment strategy.\21\ The proposed Rule would exclude the following communications from the coverage of proposed Rule 2111 as long as they do not include (standing alone or in combination with other communications) a recommendation of a particular security or securities: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ As proposed, Rule 2111 is identical to FINRA Rule 2111 except that the Exchange proposes to use the phrase ``member organization or person associated with a member organization'' rather than ``member or an associated person'' to indicate the coverage of the rule. As discussed above, ``member'' and ``member organization'' have different meanings under NYSE MKT and FINRA rules, and under the Exchange's rules only member organizations can have employees. See note 16, supra. The Exchange thus proposes to use the phrase ``person associated with a member organization'' to indicate employees of a member organization for purposes of proposed Rule 2111. \20\ See Proposed Rule 2111(a). For institutional customers, the proposed Rule would require that a member organization or person associated with a member organization have a reasonable basis to believe that the institutional customer is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, both in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies, and is exercising independent judgment in evaluating recommendations. See Proposed Rule 2111(b). Institutional customers would also be required to affirmatively indicate that they are exercising independent judgment. See id. \21\ FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71481. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------General financial and investment information, including (i) basic investment concepts, such as risk and return, diversification, dollar cost averaging, compounded return, and tax deferred investment, (ii) historic differences in the return of asset classes (e.g., equities, bonds, or cash) based on standard market indices, (iii) effects of inflation, (iv) estimates of future retirement income needs, and (v) assessment of a customer's investment profile; Descriptive information about an employer-sponsored retirement or benefit plan, participation in the plan, the benefits of plan participation, and the investment options available under the plan; Asset allocation models that are (i) based on generally accepted investment theory, (ii) accompanied by disclosures of all material facts and assumptions that may affect a reasonable investor's assessment of the asset allocation model or any report generated by such model, and (iii) in compliance with FINRA Rule 2214 (Requirements for the Use of Investment Analysis Tools) if the asset allocation model is an ``investment analysis tool'' covered by FINRA Rule 2214; and Interactive investment materials that incorporate the above.\22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Proposed Rule 2111.03. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Again like its FINRA counterpart, the proposed Rule would be composed of three main suitability obligations, as follows: The reasonable-basis suitability obligation, which requires a member organization or person associated with a member organization to have a reasonable basis to believe, based on reasonable diligence, that the recommendation is suitable for at least some investors; \23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(a). The proposed rule would clarify that, in general, what constitutes reasonable diligence will vary depending on, among other things, the complexity of and risks associated with the security or investment strategy and the member organization's or person associated with a member organization's familiarity with the security or investment strategy. Further, a member organization's or person associated with a member organization's reasonable diligence must provide the member organization or person associated with a member organization with an understanding of the potential risks and rewards associated with the recommended security or strategy. Finally, the proposed rule would specify that the lack of such an understanding when recommending a security or strategy violates the suitability rule. See generally id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The customer-specific suitability obligation, which requires that a member organization or person associated with a member organization have a reasonable basis to believe that the recommendation is suitable for a particular customer based on that customer's investment profile, as delineated in proposed Rule 2111(a); \24\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The quantitative suitability obligation, which requires a member organization or person associated with a member organization who has actual or de facto control over a customer account to have a reasonable basis for believing that a series of recommended transactions, even if suitable when viewed in isolation, are not excessive and unsuitable for the customer when taken together in light of the customer's investment profile, as delineated in proposed Rule 2111(a).\25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See Proposed Rule 2111.05(c). The proposed rule would provide that no single test defines excessive activity but that factors such as the turnover rate, the cost-equity ratio, and the use of in-and-out trading in a customer's account may provide a basis for a finding that a member organization or person associated with a member organization has violated the quantitative suitability obligation. See id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Rule 2111 would also prohibit a member organization or person associated with a member organization from recommending a transaction or investment strategy involving a security or securities or the continuing purchase of a security or securities or use of an investment strategy involving a security or securities unless the member organization or person associated with a member organization has a reasonable basis to believe that the customer has the financial ability to meet such a commitment.\26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ See Proposed Rule 2111.06. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, like the FINRA rule, proposed Rule 2111 would provide an exemption to customer-specific suitability for institutional investors, who would be required to affirmatively indicate that they are exercising independent judgment in evaluating the recommendations of the member organization on a trade-by-trade basis, on an asset-class- by-asset-class basis, or [[Page 41367]] in terms of all potential transactions for its account.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See Proposed Rule 2111.07. Like the FINRA rule, the institutional-customer exemption would apply only if both parts of the two-part test are met: (1) There is a reasonable basis to believe that the institutional customer is capable of evaluating investment risks independently, in general and with regard to particular transactions and investment strategies, and (2) the institutional customer affirmatively indicates that it is exercising independent judgment in evaluating recommendations. See Proposed Rule 2111(b); FINRA Know Your Customer and Suitability Approval, 75 FR at 71481, n. 25. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\28\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\29\ in particular, because the proposed rule change would be consistent with and facilitate a governance and regulatory structure that is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Exchange's obligations under the Exchange Act to prevent fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices, and to promote just and equitable principles of trade, because the proposed rule would incorporate the FINRA ``know your customer'' rule and related suitability standards into the Exchange's Rules. The ``know your customer'' and suitability obligations are critical to ensuring investor protection and fair dealing with customers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change supports the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act by providing greater harmonization between Exchange rules and FINRA rules of similar purpose, resulting in less burdensome and more efficient regulatory compliance. In particular, Exchange member organizations that are also FINRA members are subject to NYSE MKT Rule 405 and FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111, and harmonizing these rules by adopting proposed rules identical to FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111would promote just and equitable principles of trade by providing greater harmonization between NYSE MKT Rules and FINRA Rules of similar purpose by requiring the same standards for ``know your customer'' and suitability, resulting in less burdensome and more efficient regulatory compliance for Dual Members. As previously noted, the proposed rule text is substantially the same as NYSE MKT's rule text. To the extent the Exchange has proposed changes that differ from the FINRA version of the Exchange rules, such changes are generally technical in nature and do not change the substance of the proposed rules. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change will update and add specificity to the requirements governing ``know your customer'' and suitability requirements, which will promote just and equitable principles of trade and help to protect investors. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\30\ the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to address competitive issues but rather to achieve greater consistency between the Exchange's rules and FINRA's rules concerning ``know your customer'' and suitability. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \31\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\32\ Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b- 4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). \32\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \33\ normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\34\ the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). \34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) \35\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the [[Page 41368]] proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-59 and should be submitted on or before July 15, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\36\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-14933 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 41364 |