81 FR 43584 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 128 (July 5, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 128 (July 5, 2016)
| Page Range | 43584-43586 | |
| FR Document | 2016-15726 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 5, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 43584-43586] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-15726] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify [[Page 43585]] which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after July 2016, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity To Request A Review: Not later than the last day of July 2016,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in July for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of Review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, A- 7/1/15-6/30/16 533-824.......................................... IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios, A-507-502.............. 7/1/15-6/30/16 ITALY: Certain Pasta, A-475-818................... 7/1/15-6/30/16 JAPAN: Clad Steel Plate, A-588-838................... 7/1/15-6/30/16 Polyvinyl Alcohol, A-588-861.................. 7/1/15-6/30/16 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A- 7/1/15-6/30/16 588-845...................................... MALAYSIA: Steel Nails, A-557-816........................ 12/29/14-6/30/16 Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe, A-557- 7/1/15-6/30/16 815.......................................... OMAN: Steel Nails, A-523-808...................... 12/29/14-6/30/16 REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A- 7/1/15-6/30/16 580-834...................................... Steel Nails, A-580-874........................ 12/29/14-6/30/16 RUSSIA: Solid Urea, A-821-801..................... 7/1/15-6/30/16 SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Steel Nails, A-552-818........................ 12/29/14-6/30/16 Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe, A-552- 7/1/15-6/30/16 816.......................................... TAIWAN: Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, A-583- 7/1/15-6/30/16 837.......................................... Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils, A- 7/1/15-6/30/16 583-831...................................... Steel Nails, A-583-854........................ 5/20/15-6/30/16 THAILAND: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-549- 7/1/15-6/30/16 807.......................................... Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe, A-549- 7/1/15-6/30/16 830.......................................... THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-570- 7/1/15-6/30/16 814.......................................... Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts, A-570-962.. 7/1/15-6/30/16 Certain Steel Grating, A-570-947.............. 7/1/15-6/30/16 Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, A- 7/1/15-6/30/16 570-910...................................... Persulfates, A-570-847........................ 7/1/15-6/30/16 Xanthan Gum, A-570-985........................ 7/1/15-6/30/16 TURKEY: Certain Pasta, A-489-805.................. 7/1/15-6/30/16 UKRAINE: Solid Urea, A-823-801.................... 7/1/15-6/30/16 Countervailing Duty Proceedings INDIA: Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film, C- 1/1/15-12/31/15 533-825.......................................... ITALY: Certain Pasta, C-475-819................... 1/1/15-12/31/15 SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Steel Nails, C-552- 11/3/14-12/31/15 819.............................................. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe, C- 1/1/15-12/31/15 570-911...................................... Potassium Phosphate Salts, C-570-963.......... 1/1/15-12/31/15 Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, C-570- 1/1/15-12/31/15 946.......................................... Steel Grating, C-570-948...................... 1/1/15-12/31/15 TURKEY: Certain Pasta, C-489-806.................. 1/1/15-12/31/15 [[Page 43586]] Suspension Agreements UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A-823-815..... 7/1/15-6/30/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of July 2016. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of July 2016, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: June 28, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2016-15726 Filed 7-1-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![43584 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2016 / Notices
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case Upcoming Sunset Reviews for August and will appear in that month’s Notice
may be) and of material injury. 2016 of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review
The following Sunset Reviews are (‘‘Sunset Review’’).
scheduled for initiation in August 2016
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Glycine from China (A–570–836) (4th Review) ...................................................................................... Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of Korea (A–580–839) (3rd Review) .................................... David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan (A–583–833) (3rd Review) ............................................................ David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
No Sunset Review of countervailing International Trade Administration within five days of publication of the
duty orders is scheduled for initiation in initiation notice and to make our
August 2016. Antidumping or Countervailing Duty decision regarding respondent selection
Order, Finding, or Suspended within 21 days of publication of the
Suspended Investigations Investigation; Opportunity To Request initiation Federal Register notice.
No Sunset Review of suspended Administrative Review Therefore, we encourage all parties
investigations is scheduled for initiation AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, interested in commenting on respondent
in August 2016. International Trade Administration, selection to submit their APO
Department of Commerce. applications on the date of publication
The Department’s procedures for the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
of the initiation notice, or as soon
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD thereafter as possible. The Department
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of invites comments regarding the CBP
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Enforcement and Compliance, data and respondent selection within
Reviews provides further information five days of placement of the CBP data
regarding what is required of all parties International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th on the record of the review.
to participate in Sunset Reviews. In the event the Department decides
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) it is necessary to limit individual
Department will maintain and make 482–4735. examination of respondents and
available a service list for these conduct respondent selection under
proceedings. To facilitate the timely Background section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
preparation of the service list(s), it is Each year during the anniversary In general, the Department finds that
requested that those seeking recognition month of the publication of an determinations concerning whether
as interested parties to a proceeding antidumping or countervailing duty particular companies should be
contact the Department in writing order, finding, or suspended ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
within 10 days of the publication of the investigation, an interested party, as entity for purposes of calculating
Notice of Initiation. defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff antidumping duty rates) require a
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), substantial amount of detailed
Please note that if the Department information and analysis, which often
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate require follow-up questions and
351.213, that the Department of
from a member of the domestic industry analysis. Accordingly, the Department
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
within 15 days of the date of initiation, an administrative review of that will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the review will continue. Thereafter, antidumping or countervailing duty the respondent selection phase of this
any interested party wishing to order, finding, or suspended review and will not collapse companies
participate in the Sunset Review must investigation. at the respondent selection phase unless
provide substantive comments in All deadlines for the submission of there has been a determination to
response to the notice of initiation no comments or actions by the Department collapse certain companies in a
later than 30 days after the date of discussed below refer to the number of previous segment of this antidumping
initiation. calendar days from the applicable proceeding (i.e., investigation,
This notice is not required by statute starting date. administrative review, new shipper
but is published as a service to the review or changed circumstances
Respondent Selection review). For any company subject to this
international trading community.
In the event the Department limits the review, if the Department determined,
Dated: June 28, 2016. number of respondents for individual or continued to treat, that company as
Christian Marsh, examination for administrative reviews collapsed with others, the Department
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping initiated pursuant to requests made for will assume that such companies
and Countervailing Duty Operations. the orders identified below, the continue to operate in the same manner
[FR Doc. 2016–15724 Filed 7–1–16; 8:45 am] Department intends to select and will collapse them for respondent
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
respondents based on U.S. Customs and selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. Department will not collapse companies
imports during the period of review. We for purposes of respondent selection.
intend to release the CBP data under Parties are requested to (a) identify
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Jul 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM 05JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_43712/page/1.svg)
![43586 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2016 / Notices
Period of Review
Suspension Agreements
UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–823–815 ............................................................................................................... 7/1/15–6/30/16
In accordance with 19 CFR merchandise subject to antidumping access.trade.gov.4 Further, in
351.213(b), an interested party as findings and orders.2 accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i),
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may Further, as explained in Antidumping a copy of each request must be served
request in writing that the Secretary Proceedings: Announcement of Change on the petitioner and each exporter or
conduct an administrative review. For in Department Practice for Respondent producer specified in the request.
both antidumping and countervailing Selection in Antidumping Duty
The Department will publish in the
duty reviews, the interested party must Proceedings and Conditional Review of
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
specify the individual producers or the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
exporters covered by an antidumping Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR of Administrative Review of
finding or an antidumping or 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
countervailing duty order or suspension Department clarified its practice with Order, Finding, or Suspended
agreement for which it is requesting a regard to the conditional review of the Investigation’’ for requests received by
review. In addition, a domestic non-market economy (NME) entity in the last day of July 2016. If the
interested party or an interested party administrative reviews of antidumping Department does not receive, by the last
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act duty orders. The Department will no day of July 2016, a request for review of
must state why it desires the Secretary longer consider the NME entity as an entries covered by an order, finding, or
to review those particular producers or exporter conditionally subject to suspended investigation listed in this
exporters. If the interested party intends administrative reviews. Accordingly, notice and for the period identified
for the Secretary to review sales of the NME entity will not be under review above, the Department will instruct CBP
merchandise by an exporter (or a unless the Department specifically to assess antidumping or countervailing
producer if that producer also exports receives a request for, or self-initiates, a duties on those entries at a rate equal to
merchandise from other suppliers) review of the NME entity.3 In the cash deposit of (or bond for)
which was produced in more than one administrative reviews of antidumping estimated antidumping or
country of origin and each country of duty orders on merchandise from NME countervailing duties required on those
origin is subject to a separate order, then countries where a review of the NME entries at the time of entry, or
the interested party must state entity has not been initiated, but where withdrawal from warehouse, for
specifically, on an order-by-order basis, an individual exporter for which a consumption and to continue to collect
which exporter(s) the request is review was initiated does not qualify for the cash deposit previously ordered.
intended to cover. a separate rate, the Department will
Note that, for any party the issue a final decision indicating that the For the first administrative review of
Department was unable to locate in company in question is part of the NME any order, there will be no assessment
prior segments, the Department will not entity. However, in that situation, of antidumping or countervailing duties
accept a request for an administrative because no review of the NME entity on entries of subject merchandise
review of that party absent new was conducted, the NME entity’s entries entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
information as to the party’s location. were not subject to the review and the for consumption during the relevant
Moreover, if the interested party who rate for the NME entity is not subject to provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
files a request for review is unable to change as a result of that review the order, if such a gap period is
locate the producer or exporter for (although the rate for the individual applicable to the period of review.
which it requested the review, the exporter may change as a function of the This notice is not required by statute
interested party must provide an finding that the exporter is part of the but is published as a service to the
explanation of the attempts it made to NME entity). Following initiation of an international trading community.
locate the producer or exporter at the antidumping administrative review
same time it files its request for review, when there is no review requested of the Dated: June 28, 2016.
in order for the Secretary to determine NME entity, the Department will Christian Marsh,
if the interested party’s attempts were instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR exporters not named in the initiation and Countervailing Duty Operations.
351.303(f)(3)(ii). notice, including those that were [FR Doc. 2016–15726 Filed 7–1–16; 8:45 am]
As explained in Antidumping and suspended at the NME entity rate. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: All requests must be filed
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 electronically in Enforcement and
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Compliance’s Antidumping and
Market Economy Antidumping Countervailing Duty Centralized
Proceedings: Assessment of Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’)
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 on Enforcement and Compliance’s
(October 24, 2011) the Department
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
ACCESS Web site at http://
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties 2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
on imports of merchandise where site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/.
3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
intermediate firms are involved. The 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
should specify that they are requesting a review of
public should be aware of this entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
clarification in determining whether to the extent possible, include the names of such Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
request an administrative review of exporters in their request. 39263 (July 6, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:27 Jul 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM 05JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_43712/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-01 23:50:03
Document Modified: 2016-07-01 23:50:03
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 43584 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR