81 FR 44815 - Special Local Regulation; Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Bucksport, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 132 (July 11, 2016)

Page Range		44815-44817
FR Document		2016-16333

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bucksport, South Carolina during the Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, on September 10 and September 11, 2016. This special local regulation is necessary to ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and the general public during the event. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44815-44817]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16333]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0012]
RIN 1625-AA08


Special Local Regulation; Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall 
Nationals, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Bucksport, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local 
regulation on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bucksport, South 
Carolina during the Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, on 
September 10 and September 11, 2016. This special local regulation is 
necessary to ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and the 
general public during the event. This proposed rulemaking would 
prohibit persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before August 10, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0012 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector 
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 
740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

[[Page 44816]]

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 27, 2015, the Bucksport Marina notified the Coast Guard 
that it will sponsor a series of drag boat races from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. 
on September 10 and September 11, 2016. The legal basis for the 
proposed rule is the Coast Guard's Authority to establish special local 
regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233. The purpose of the proposed rule is to 
ensure safety of life on the navigable water of the United States 
during the Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, a series of 
high speed boat races.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation on 
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bucksport, South Carolina during 
the Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, on September 10 and 
September 11, 2016. Approximately 75 powerboats are expected to 
participate in the races and approximately 35 spectator vessels are 
expected to attend the event. Persons and vessels desiring to enter, 
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area may 
contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-
7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to 
request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, 
anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is granted by the 
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all 
persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the 
instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated 
representative. The Coast Guard will provide notice of the special 
local regulation by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and 
we discuss the First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under 
section 3(f) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, 
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits 
under section 6(a)(3) of E.O. 12866 or under section 1 of E.O. 13563. 
The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those 
Orders.
    The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for 
the following reasons: (1) The special local regulation would be 
enforced for only six hours a day over a two-day period; (2) although 
persons and vessels would not be able to enter, transit through, anchor 
in, or remain within the regulated area without authorization from the 
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they 
would be able to operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement 
periods; (3) persons and vessels would still be able to enter, transit 
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area if authorized 
by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative; 
and (4) the Coast Guard would provide advance notification of the 
regulated area to the local maritime community by Local Notice to 
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-
profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are 
not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with 
populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have 
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. This 
rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be small 
entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to enter, transit 
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area during the 
enforcement period. For the reasons discussed in Regulatory Planning 
and Review section above, this rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

[[Page 44817]]

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves special 
local regulation issued in conjunction with a regatta or marine parade. 
This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments 
or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  100.T07-0012 to read as follows:


Sec.  100.T07-0012  Special Local Regulations; Bucksport/Lake Murray 
Drag Boat Spring Nationals, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Bucksport, 
SC.

    (a) Regulated area. All waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal 
Waterway encompassed by a line connecting the following points: Point 1 
in position 33[deg]39'13'' N., 079[deg]05'36'' W.; thence west to point 
2 in position 33[deg]39'17'' N., 079[deg]05'46'' W.; thence south to 
point 3 in position 33[deg]38'53'' N., 079[deg]05'39'' W.; thence east 
to point 4 in position 33[deg]38'54'' N., 079[deg]05'31'' W.; thence 
north back to point 1. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. As used in this section, ``designated 
representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast 
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast 
Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or 
assisting the Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the 
regulated areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
regulated area, except persons and vessels participating in Bucksport/
Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals or serving as safety vessels. 
Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or 
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port 
Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated 
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. 
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within 
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or 
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such 
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the 
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (2) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by 
Marine Safety Information Bulletins, Local Notice to Mariners, 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Date. This rule will be enforced daily from 1 p.m. 
to 7 p.m. on September 10, and September 11, 2016.

    Dated: June 27, 2016.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2016-16333 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules 44815

service information identified in paragraph (n) Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 1,
(j)(2)(i), (j)(2)(ii), or (j)(2)(iii) of this AD: Do The following provisions also apply to this 2016.
the actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of AD: Phillip Forde,
this AD within the initial compliance time (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
specified by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (AMOCs): The Manager, International Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(h)(3) of this AD, as applicable. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. 2016–16210 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am]
(2) For airplanes previously inspected Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
before the effective date of this AD using the approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
service information identified in paragraph using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(j)(2)(i), (j)(2)(ii), or (j)(2)(iii) of this AD: Do In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
the actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of request to your principal inspector or local DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
this AD within the applicable compliance Flight Standards District Office, as SECURITY
times specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), appropriate. If sending information directly
and (i)(3) of this AD. to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Coast Guard
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
dated May 6, 2008. International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
33 CFR Part 100
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Revision 01, dated August 5, 2010. Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; [Docket Number USCG–2016–0012]
telephone 425–227–2125; fax 425–227–1149.
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57– RIN 1625–AA08
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-
2096, Revision 02, dated March 5, 2014.
AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
(k) Repair of Cracking any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate Special Local Regulation; Bucksport/
principal inspector, or lacking a principal Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals,
If any cracking is found during any
inspector, the manager of the local flight Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway;
inspection required by paragraph (g), (h), (i),
standards district office/certificate holding Bucksport, SC
or (j) of this AD, before further flight, repair district office. The AMOC approval letter
the cracking using a method approved by the must specifically reference this AD. AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the effective date of this AD, for any requirement
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or in this AD to obtain corrective actions from SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
Airbus’s EASA Design Organization a manufacturer, the action must be establish a special local regulation on
Approval (DOA). Accomplishing the repair accomplished using a method approved by the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in
specified in this paragraph terminates the the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
repetitive inspections required by paragraph 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
Bucksport, South Carolina during the
(h), (i), or (j) of this AD, as applicable, for the the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall
repaired area only. approved by the DOA, the approval must Nationals, on September 10 and
include the DOA-authorized signature. September 11, 2016. This special local
(l) Definition of Average Flight Time (AFT) (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except regulation is necessary to ensure the
For the purposes of this AD, the AFT as required by paragraph (k) of this AD, if any safety of participants, spectators, and
should be established as specified in service information contains procedures or the general public during the event.
paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(2), and (l)(3) of this AD tests that are identified as RC, those This proposed rulemaking would
for the determination of the compliance procedures and tests must be done to comply
prohibit persons and vessels from being
times. with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those in the regulated area unless authorized
(1) The inspection threshold is defined as
procedures and tests that are not identified by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
the total flight hours accumulated (counted
from take-off to touch-down), divided by the as RC may be deviated from using accepted a designated representative. We invite
total number of flight cycles accumulated at methods in accordance with the operator’s your comments on this proposed
the effective date of this AD. maintenance or inspection program without rulemaking.
(2) The initial inspection interval is obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can DATES: Comments and related material
defined as the total flight hours accumulated must be received by the Coast Guard on
be done and the airplane can be put back in
divided by the total number of flight cycles or before August 10, 2016.
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
accumulated at the time of the initial
changes to procedures or tests identified as ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
inspection threshold.
RC require approval of an AMOC. identified by docket number USCG–
(3) The second inspection interval is
defined as the total flight hours accumulated (o) Related Information 2016–0012 using the Federal
divided by the total number of flight cycles (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing eRulemaking Portal at http://
accumulated between the initial and second Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
inspection threshold. Airworthiness Directive 2016–0005, dated Participation and Request for
(m) Credit for Previous Actions January 7, 2016, for related information. This Comments’’ portion of the
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
This paragraph provides credit for the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by further instructions on submitting
actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– comments.
AD, if those actions were performed before 2015–3985.
the effective date of this AD using the (2) For service information identified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
applicable service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness you have questions about this proposed
paragraph (m)(1), (m)(2), or (m)(3) of this AD. Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
(1) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; John Downing, Sector Charleston Office
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

dated May 6, 2008, which was incorporated telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 of Waterways Management, Coast
by reference in AD 2010–04–03. 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ Guard; telephone (843) 740–3184, email
(2) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
Revision 01, dated August 5, 2010, which is
John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil.
You may view this service information at the
not incorporated by reference in this AD. FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A310–57–2096, Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For I. Table of Abbreviations
Revision 02, dated March 5, 2014, which is information on the availability of this
not incorporated by reference in this AD. material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. CFR Code of Federal Regulations

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:20 Jul 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

44816 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules

DHS Department of Homeland Security regulation is necessary, to select period. For the reasons discussed in
FR Federal Register regulatory approaches that maximize Regulatory Planning and Review section
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the above, this rule will not have a
Pub. L. Public Law
importance of quantifying both costs significant economic impact on a
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code and benefits, of reducing costs, of substantial number of small entities.
harmonizing rules, and of promoting If you think that your business,
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal flexibility. This NPRM has not been organization, or governmental
Basis designated a ‘‘significant regulatory jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
On December 27, 2015, the Bucksport action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, and that this rule would have a
Marina notified the Coast Guard that it the NPRM has not been reviewed by the significant economic impact on it,
will sponsor a series of drag boat races Office of Management and Budget. please submit a comment (see
from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. on September 10 This proposed rule is not a significant ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
and September 11, 2016. The legal basis regulatory action under section 3(f) of qualifies and how and to what degree
for the proposed rule is the Coast E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and this rule would economically affect it.
Guard’s Authority to establish special Review, as supplemented by E.O. 13563, Under section 213(a) of the Small
local regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233. The Improving Regulation and Regulatory Business Regulatory Enforcement
purpose of the proposed rule is to Review, and does not require an Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
ensure safety of life on the navigable assessment of potential costs and we want to assist small entities in
water of the United States during the benefits under section 6(a)(3) of E.O. understanding this proposed rule. If the
Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall 12866 or under section 1 of E.O. 13563. rule would affect your small business,
Nationals, a series of high speed boat The Office of Management and Budget organization, or governmental
races. has not reviewed it under those Orders. jurisdiction and you have questions
The economic impact of this proposed
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule concerning its provisions or options for
rule is not significant for the following
compliance, please contact the person
The Coast Guard proposes to establish reasons: (1) The special local regulation
would be enforced for only six hours a listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
a special local regulation on the Atlantic CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
Intracoastal Waterway in Bucksport, day over a two-day period; (2) although
persons and vessels would not be able not retaliate against small entities that
South Carolina during the Bucksport/ question or complain about this
Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area proposed rule or any policy or action of
on September 10 and September 11, the Coast Guard.
2016. Approximately 75 powerboats are without authorization from the Captain
expected to participate in the races and of the Port Charleston or a designated C. Collection of Information
approximately 35 spectator vessels are representative, they would be able to
operate in the surrounding area during This proposed rule would not call for
expected to attend the event. Persons
the enforcement periods; (3) persons a new collection of information under
and vessels desiring to enter, transit
and vessels would still be able to enter, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
through, anchor in, or remain within the
transit through, anchor in, or remain (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
regulated area may contact the Captain
of the Port Charleston by telephone at within the regulated area if authorized D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
(843) 740–7050, or a designated by the Captain of the Port Charleston or Governments
representative via VHF radio on channel a designated representative; and (4) the
Coast Guard would provide advance A rule has implications for federalism
16, to request authorization. If
notification of the regulated area to the under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
authorization to enter, transit through,
local maritime community by Local a substantial direct effect on the States,
anchor in, or remain within the
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice on the relationship between the national
regulated area is granted by the Captain
to Mariners. government and the States, or on the
of the Port Charleston or a designated
distribution of power and
representative, all persons and vessels B. Impact on Small Entities responsibilities among the various
receiving such authorization must
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of levels of government. We have analyzed
comply with the instructions of the
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended this proposed rule under that Order and
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
requires Federal agencies to consider have determined that it is consistent
designated representative. The Coast
the potential impact of regulations on with the fundamental federalism
Guard will provide notice of the special
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small principles and preemption requirements
local regulation by Local Notice to
businesses, not-for-profit organizations described in E.O. 13132.
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
and on-scene designated that are independently owned and Also, this proposed rule does not have
representatives. operated and are not dominant in their tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
fields, and governmental jurisdictions Consultation and Coordination with
IV. Regulatory Analyses with populations of less than 50,000. Indian Tribal Governments, because it
We developed this proposed rule after The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. would not have a substantial direct
considering numerous statutes and 605(b) that this proposed rule would not effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. have a significant economic impact on the relationship between the Federal
Below we summarize our analyses a substantial number of small entities. Government and Indian tribes, or on the
We have considered the impact of this distribution of power and
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders and we discuss the proposed rule on small entities. This responsibilities between the Federal
First Amendment rights of protestors. rule may affect the following entities, Government and Indian tribes. If you
some of which may be small entities: believe this proposed rule has
A. Regulatory Planning and Review the owner or operators of vessels implications for federalism or Indian
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies intending to enter, transit through, tribes, please contact the person listed
to assess the costs and benefits of anchor in, or remain within the in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
available regulatory alternatives and, if regulated area during the enforcement CONTACT section above.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:20 Jul 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

Document Created: 2016-07-09 00:21:17
Document Modified: 2016-07-09 00:21:17

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 10, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 44815
RIN Number		1625-AA08
CFR Associated		Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Waterways

81 FR 44815 - Special Local Regulation; Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Fall Nationals, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; Bucksport, SC

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 132 (July 11, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard