81 FR 44825 - Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 132 (July 11, 2016)

Page Range		44825-44827
FR Document		2016-16331

The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters of the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona Beach, Florida during the Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the event. This safety zone will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., from October 6 through October 9, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville or a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44825-44827]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0077]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show; Atlantic 
Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the 
waters of the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona Beach, Florida during the 
Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show. This action is necessary to 
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the 
event. This safety zone will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 
from October 6 through October 9, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would 
prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville or a 
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed 
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast 
Guard on or before August 10, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0077 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for 
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further 
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector 
Jacksonville, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone (904) 714-7616, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On December 15, 2015, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University/David 
Schultz Airshows LLC submitted a marine event application to the Coast 
Guard for the Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show that will take 
place from October 6 through 9, 2016. The air show will consist of 
various flight demonstrations over the Atlantic Ocean, just offshore 
from Daytona Beach, FL. Over the years, there have been unfortunate 
instances of aircraft mishaps that involve crashing during performances 
at various air shows around the world. Occasionally, these incidents 
result in a wide area of scattered debris in the water that can damage 
property or cause significant injury or death to the public observing

[[Page 44826]]

the air shows from the water. The Captain of the Port (COTP) 
Jacksonville has determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect 
the general public from hazards associated with aerial flight 
demonstrations.
    The purpose of the rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels 
and persons during the air show on the navigable waters of the Atlantic 
Ocean in Daytona Beach, FL. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking 
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 11 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. on October 6 through October 9, 2016. The safety zone will 
encompass all waters within an area approximately two nautical miles 
parallel to the shoreline, and one half nautical mile out into the 
Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona Beach, Florida. The duration of 
the zone is intended to ensure the safety of the public and these 
navigable waters during the aerial flight demonstrations. No vessel or 
person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory 
text the Coast Guard is proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and 
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would 
impact a small designated area of the Atlantic Ocean for five and a 
half hours on each of the four days the air show is occurring. 
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a broadcast notice to mariners 
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow 
vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule 
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety 
zone that would prohibit persons and vessels from transiting through a 
one square nautical mile regulated area during a four day air show 
lasting five and a half hours daily. Normally such actions are 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary 
environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under

[[Page 44827]]

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal 
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal 
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T07-0077 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T07-0077  Safety Zone; Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air 
Show, Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL.

    (a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone 
located offshore from Daytona Beach, FL. All waters of the Atlantic 
Ocean encompassed within an imaginary line connecting the following 
points: Starting at Point 1 in position 29[deg]14'44.72'' N., 
081[deg]0'46.90'' W.; thence northeast to Point 2 in position 
29[deg]14'58.74'' N., 081[deg]0'16.18'' W.; thence southeast to Point 3 
in position 29[deg]13'3.80'' N., 080[deg]59'21.78'' W.; thence 
southwest to Point 4 in position 29[deg]12'54.63'' N., 
080[deg]59'53.87'' W.; thence northwest back to origin. These 
coordinates are based on North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast 
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and 
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the enforcement of the regulated 
area.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from 
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the 
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Jacksonville or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor 
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the 
Port Jacksonville by telephone at 904-714-7557, or a designated 
representative via VHF-FM radio on channel 16, to request 
authorization. If authorization is granted, all persons and vessels 
receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the 
COTP Jacksonville or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area 
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM channel 16 or by on-
scene designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced daily 11 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m. from October 6 through October 9, 2016.

    Dated: June 27, 2016.
J.F. Dixon,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2016-16331 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules 44825

standards-setting organization, and the § 164.03 Incorporation by reference. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
IMO. * * * * *
(h) International Electrotechnical SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
M. Environment establish a safety zone on the waters of
Commission (IEC), 3, rue de Varembe,
We have analyzed this proposed rule the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona
Geneva, Switzerland, +41 22 919 02 11,
under Department of Homeland Beach, Florida during the Daytona
http://www.iec.ch/.
Security Management Directive 023–01 Beach Wings and Waves Air Show. This
(1) IEC 62065 Edition 1.0 (2002–03),
and Commandant Instruction action is necessary to provide for the
Maritime navigation and
M16475.1D, which guide the Coast safety of life on the navigable waters
radiocommunications equipment and
Guard in complying with the National surrounding the event. This safety zone
systems—Track control systems—
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30
Operational and performance
U.S.C. 4321–4370f, and we have made p.m., from October 6 through October 9,
requirements, methods of testing and
a preliminary determination that this 2016. This proposed rulemaking would
required test results—incorporation by
action is one of a category of actions that prohibit persons and vessels from being
reference approved for § 164.13(d).
do not individually or cumulatively in the safety zone unless authorized by
(2) IEC 62065 Edition 2.0 (2014–02),
have a significant effect on the human the Captain of the Port (COTP)
Maritime navigation and
environment. A preliminary Jacksonville or a designated
radiocommunications equipment and
environmental analysis checklist representative. We invite your
systems—Track control systems—
supporting this categorical exclusion comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Operational and performance
determination is available in the docket DATES: Comments and related material
requirements, methods of testing and
where indicated under the ‘‘Public required test results—incorporation by must be received by the Coast Guard on
Participation and Request for reference approved for § 164.13(d). or before August 10, 2016.
Comments’’ section of this preamble. ■ 3. Amend § 164.13 by removing ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
This proposed rule involves paragraph (e) and revising paragraph (d) identified by docket number USCG–
regulations concerning tank vessel to read as follows: 2016–0077 using the Federal
equipment approval and operation. eRulemaking Portal at http://
Thus, this proposed rule will likely be § 164.13 Navigation underway: Tankers. www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
categorically excluded under Section * * * * * Participation and Request for
2.b.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(d), (e), (d) This paragraph (d) has preemptive Comments’’ portion of the
and (i) of the Instruction and Section effect over State or local regulation SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
6(a) of the ‘‘Appendix to National within the same field. A tanker may further instructions on submitting
Environmental Policy Act: Coast Guard navigate using a heading or track control comments.
Procedures for Categorical Exclusions, system only if— FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
Notice of Final Agency Policy’’ (67 FR (1) The tanker is beyond one-half you have questions about this proposed
48243, July 23, 2002). We seek any nautical mile off shore or not within rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
comments or information that may lead waters specified in 33 CFR part 110 Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville,
to the discovery of a significant (anchorages); Waterways Management Division, U.S.
environmental impact from this (2) There is a person, competent to Coast Guard; telephone (904) 714–7616,
proposed rule. steer the vessel, present to assume email Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
manual control of the steering station; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 164
and
Marine, Navigation (water), (3) The system meets the heading or I. Table of Abbreviations
Incorporation by reference, Reporting track control specifications of either IEC CFR Code of Federal Regulations
and recordkeeping requirements, 62065 (2002:03) or IEC 62065 (2014:02) DHS Department of Homeland Security
Waterways. (incorporated by reference, see FR Federal Register
For the reasons discussed in the § 164.03). NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to § § Section
Dated: June 28, 2016. U.S.C. United States Code
amend 33 CFR part 164 as follows: David C. Barata,
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable Acting Director of Marine Transportation II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Waters Systems Management, U.S. Coast Guard. Basis
[FR Doc. 2016–15791 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am] On December 15, 2015, Embry Riddle
PART 164—NAVIGATION SAFETY BILLING CODE 9110–04–P Aeronautical University/David Schultz
REGULATIONS Airshows LLC submitted a marine event
application to the Coast Guard for the
■ 1. The authority citation for part 164 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air
is revised to read as follows: SECURITY Show that will take place from October
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 6 through 9, 2016. The air show will
2103, 3703; and E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 Coast Guard consist of various flight demonstrations
CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277. Sec. 164.13 also over the Atlantic Ocean, just offshore
issued under 46 U.S.C. 8502. Sec. 164.46 also 33 CFR Part 165 from Daytona Beach, FL. Over the years,
issued under 46 U.S.C. 70114 and Sec. 102
there have been unfortunate instances of
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

of Pub. L. 107–295. Sec. 164.61 also issued [Docket Number USCG–2016–0077]
under 46 U.S.C. 6101. The Secretary’s aircraft mishaps that involve crashing
RIN 1625–AA00 during performances at various air
authority under these sections is delegated to
the Coast Guard by Department of Homeland Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings shows around the world. Occasionally,
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. II (70),
and Waves Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, these incidents result in a wide area of
(92.a), (92.b), (92.d), (92.f), and (97.j). scattered debris in the water that can
Daytona Beach, FL
■ 2. Amend § 164.03 by adding damage property or cause significant
paragraph (h) to read as follows: AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. injury or death to the public observing

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:20 Jul 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

44826 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules

the air shows from the water. The show is occurring. Moreover, the Coast the States, or on the distribution of
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville Guard would issue a broadcast notice to power and responsibilities among the
has determined that a safety zone is mariners via VHF–FM marine channel various levels of government. We have
necessary to protect the general public 16 about the zone, and the rule would analyzed this proposed rule under that
from hazards associated with aerial allow vessels to seek permission to enter Order and have determined that it is
flight demonstrations. the zone. consistent with the fundamental
The purpose of the rulemaking is to federalism principles and preemption
ensure the safety of vessels and persons B. Impact on Small Entities requirements described in Executive
during the air show on the navigable The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Order 13132.
waters of the Atlantic Ocean in Daytona 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, Also, this proposed rule does not have
Beach, FL. The Coast Guard proposes requires Federal agencies to consider tribal implications under Executive
this rulemaking under authority in 33 the potential impact of regulations on Order 13175, Consultation and
U.S.C. 1231. small entities during rulemaking. The Coordination with Indian Tribal
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Governments, because it would not have
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule businesses, not-for-profit organizations a substantial direct effect on one or
The COTP proposes to establish a that are independently owned and more Indian tribes, on the relationship
safety zone from 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on operated and are not dominant in their between the Federal Government and
October 6 through October 9, 2016. The fields, and governmental jurisdictions Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
safety zone will encompass all waters with populations of less than 50,000. power and responsibilities between the
within an area approximately two The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. Federal Government and Indian tribes.
nautical miles parallel to the shoreline, 605(b) that this proposed rule would not If you believe this proposed rule has
and one half nautical mile out into the have a significant economic impact on implications for federalism or Indian
Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona a substantial number of small entities. tribes, please contact the person listed
Beach, Florida. The duration of the zone While some owners or operators of in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
is intended to ensure the safety of the vessels intending to transit the safety CONTACT section.
public and these navigable waters zone may be small entities, for the E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
during the aerial flight demonstrations. reasons stated in section IV.A above this
No vessel or person would be permitted proposed rule would not have a The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
to enter the safety zone without significant economic impact on any of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
obtaining permission from the COTP or vessel owner or operator. Federal agencies to assess the effects of
a designated representative. The If you think that your business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
regulatory text the Coast Guard is organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
proposing appears at the end of this jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity that may result in the expenditure by a
document. and that this rule would have a State, local, or tribal government, in the
significant economic impact on it, aggregate, or by the private sector of
IV. Regulatory Analyses $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
please submit a comment (see
We developed this proposed rule after ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it more in any one year. Though this
considering numerous statutes and qualifies and how and to what degree proposed rule would not result in such
Executive orders related to rulemaking. this rule would economically affect it. an expenditure, we do discuss the
Below we summarize our analyses Under section 213(a) of the Small effects of this rule elsewhere in this
based on a number of these statutes and Business Regulatory Enforcement preamble.
Executive orders and we discuss First Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), F. Environment
Amendment rights of protestors. we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the We have analyzed this proposed rule
A. Regulatory Planning and Review under Department of Homeland
rule would affect your small business,
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 organization, or governmental Security Management Directive 023–01
direct agencies to assess the costs and jurisdiction and you have questions and Commandant Instruction
benefits of available regulatory concerning its provisions or options for M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
alternatives and, if regulation is compliance, please contact the person Guard in complying with the National
necessary, to select regulatory listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
approaches that maximize net benefits. CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the not retaliate against small entities that preliminary determination that this
importance of quantifying both costs question or complain about this action is one of a category of actions that
and benefits, of reducing costs, of proposed rule or any policy or action of do not individually or cumulatively
harmonizing rules, and of promoting the Coast Guard. have a significant effect on the human
flexibility. This NPRM has not been environment. This proposed rule
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory C. Collection of Information involves a safety zone that would
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule would not call for prohibit persons and vessels from
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been a new collection of information under transiting through a one square nautical
reviewed by the Office of Management the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 mile regulated area during a four day air
and Budget. (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). show lasting five and a half hours daily.
This regulatory action determination Normally such actions are categorically
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

is based on the size, location, duration, D. Federalism and Indian Tribal excluded from further review under
and time-of-day of the safety zone. Governments paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of
Vessel traffic would be able to safely A rule has implications for federalism Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A
transit around this safety zone which under Executive Order 13132, preliminary environmental analysis
would impact a small designated area of Federalism, if it has a substantial direct checklist and Categorical Exclusion
the Atlantic Ocean for five and a half effect on the States, on the relationship Determination are available in the
hours on each of the four days the air between the national government and docket where indicated under

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:20 Jul 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM 11JYP1

Document Created: 2016-07-09 00:21:47
Document Modified: 2016-07-09 00:21:47

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Proposed Rules
Action		Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Dates		Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 10, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (904) 714-7616, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 44825
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 44825 - Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 132 (July 11, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard