81 FR 45020 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)

Page Range		45020-45022
FR Document		2016-16226

The Coast Guard is modifying the operating schedule that governs the Metro-North WALK Bridge across the Norwalk River, mile 0.1, at Norwalk, Connecticut. The bridge owner submitted a request to require a greater advance notice for bridge openings and to increase time periods the bridge remains in the closed position during the weekday morning and evening rush hours. It is expected that this change to the regulations will create efficiency in drawbridge operations while continuing to meet the reasonable needs of navigation.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45020-45022]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2014-1057]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is modifying the operating schedule that 
governs the Metro-North WALK Bridge across the Norwalk River, mile 0.1, 
at Norwalk, Connecticut. The bridge owner submitted a request to 
require a greater advance notice for bridge openings and to increase 
time periods the bridge remains in the closed position during the 
weekday morning and evening rush hours. It is expected that this change 
to the regulations will create efficiency in drawbridge operations 
while continuing to meet the reasonable needs of navigation.

DATES: This rule is effective August 11, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type ``USCG-
2014-1057'' in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Mr. Christopher J. Bisignano, Supervisory Bridge 
Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District, Coast Guard; 
telephone (212) 514-4331 or email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard twice published a notice of proposed rulemaking to 
adjust when the draw of the Metro-North WALK Bridge will be available 
to open Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. In response to 
comments received to the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), 
published in August 2015 (80 FR 52423), the Coast Guard conducted 
further review of tidal data, bridge logs and train schedules.
    On April 4, 2016, we published a supplemental notice of proposed 
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Norwalk 
River, Norwalk, CT, in the Federal Register (81 FR 19094), soliciting 
comments on the proposed rule through May 4, 2016. In addition, 
Commander (dpb), First Coast Guard District published Public Notice 1-
150 dated April 4, 2016. We received two

[[Page 45021]]

comments on the proposed rule, which will be addressed in Section IV, 
below.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
499.
    The Metro-North WALK Bridge, mile 0.1, across the Norwalk River at 
Norwalk, CT, has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 16 feet 
at mean high water and 23 feet at mean low water. The drawbridge 
operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.217(b). The waterway 
users are seasonal recreational vessels and commercial vessels of 
various sizes. The owner of the bridge, Connecticut Department of 
Transportation (CDOT), requested a change to the Drawbridge Operation 
Regulations because the volume of train traffic across the bridge 
during the peak commuting hours makes bridge openings impractical under 
the current schedule. As a result, bridge openings that occur during 
peak commuter train hours cause significant delays to commuter rail 
traffic.
    The Coast Guard believes these final changes balance the needs of 
rail and vessel traffic. The proposed changes enhance rail traffic 
without significantly impacting vessel traffic.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule

    We received two submissions commenting on the SNPRM. One comment 
requested that any modification to the existing rule should not be 
extended past the initiation of construction of a new replacement 
bridge. The Coast Guard disagrees. A replacement bridge is only in the 
planning stage at CDOT. Design and construction of a replacement 
project for a bridge of this scale typically takes several years. As 
the timeline of a potential bridge replacement is uncertain, the Coast 
Guard cannot consider it within this rulemaking.
    One comment suggested the Coast Guard consider revising the AM peak 
window to end at 8:45 a.m. and revising the PM peak window to begin at 
4:15 p.m. and end at 8:20 p.m. to better accommodate commuters. The 
Coast Guard believes that the proposed rule offers greater 
consideration to peak commuter train traffic by restricting bridge 
openings until 9:45 a.m. The Coast Guard also believes that the PM peak 
revision of the proposed rule more adequately addresses the concerns in 
the comment by offering an additional 15 minutes on the front end by 
restricting bridge openings starting at 4 p.m. In addition, while the 
train schedules do adjust twice annually, only one train crosses the 
bridge between 8 p.m. and 8:20 p.m. Therefore, the Coast Guard believes 
ending the restriction to bridge openings at 8 p.m. is sufficient. The 
proposed changes balance the needs of rail and vessel traffic, 
enhancing rail traffic without significant adverse impact to vessel 
traffic.
    The Coast Guard amends 33 CFR 117.217(b) as proposed in the SNPRM 
of April 4, 2016.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protesters.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that 
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice. The 
vertical clearance under the bridge in the closed position is 
relatively high enough to accommodate most vessel traffic during the 
time periods the draw is closed during the morning and evening commuter 
rush hours.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of 
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the 
reasons stated in section V.A above this final rule would not have a 
significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

[[Page 45022]]

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a 
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do 
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or 
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from 
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the 
Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an 
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are not required for this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Revise Sec.  117.217, paragraph (b), to read as follows:


Sec.  117.217  Norwalk River.

* * * * *
    (b) The draw of the Metro-North ``WALK'' Bridge, mile 0.1, at 
Norwalk, shall operate as follows:
    (1) The draw shall open on signal between 4:30 a.m. and 9 p.m. 
after at least a two hour advance notice is given; except that, from 
5:45 a.m. through 9:45 a.m. and from 4 p.m. through 8 p.m., Monday 
through Friday excluding holidays, the draw need not open for the 
passage of vessel traffic unless an emergency exists.
    (2) From 9 p.m. through 4:30 a.m. the draw shall open on signal 
after at least a four hour advance notice is given.
    (3) A delay in opening the draw not to exceed 10 minutes may occur 
when a train scheduled to cross the bridge without stopping has entered 
the drawbridge lock.
    (4) Requests for bridge openings may be made by calling the bridge 
via marine radio VHF FM Channel 13 or the telephone number posted at 
the bridge.

    Dated: June 23, 2016.
S.D. Poulin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2016-16226 Filed 7-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 45021

comments on the proposed rule, which between 8 p.m. and 8:20 p.m. Therefore, final rule would not have a significant
will be addressed in Section IV, below. the Coast Guard believes ending the economic impact on any vessel owner
restriction to bridge openings at 8 p.m. or operator.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
is sufficient. The proposed changes Under section 213(a) of the Small
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule balance the needs of rail and vessel
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 499. Business Regulatory Enforcement
traffic, enhancing rail traffic without Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
The Metro-North WALK Bridge, mile significant adverse impact to vessel
0.1, across the Norwalk River at we want to assist small entities in
traffic.
Norwalk, CT, has a vertical clearance in The Coast Guard amends 33 CFR understanding this rule. If the rule
the closed position of 16 feet at mean 117.217(b) as proposed in the SNPRM of would affect your small business,
high water and 23 feet at mean low April 4, 2016. organization, or governmental
water. The drawbridge operation jurisdiction and you have questions
regulations are listed at 33 CFR V. Regulatory Analyses concerning its provisions or options for
117.217(b). The waterway users are We developed this rule after compliance, please contact the person
seasonal recreational vessels and considering numerous statutes and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
commercial vessels of various sizes. The executive orders (E.O.s) related to CONTACT, above.
owner of the bridge, Connecticut rulemaking. Below we summarize our Small businesses may send comments
Department of Transportation (CDOT), analyses based on a number of these on the actions of Federal employees
requested a change to the Drawbridge statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First who enforce, or otherwise determine
Operation Regulations because the Amendment rights of protesters. compliance with, Federal regulations to
volume of train traffic across the bridge the Small Business and Agriculture
during the peak commuting hours A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
makes bridge openings impractical E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies and the Regional Small Business
under the current schedule. As a result, to assess the costs and benefits of Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
bridge openings that occur during peak available regulatory alternatives and, if
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
commuter train hours cause significant regulation is necessary, to select
annually and rates each agency’s
delays to commuter rail traffic. regulatory approaches that maximize
responsiveness to small business. If you
The Coast Guard believes these final net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
wish to comment on actions by
changes balance the needs of rail and importance of quantifying both costs
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
vessel traffic. The proposed changes and benefits, of reducing costs, of
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
enhance rail traffic without significantly harmonizing rules, and of promoting
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
impacting vessel traffic. flexibility. This rule has not been
small entities that question or complain
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes about this rule or any policy or action
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
and the Final Rule of the Coast Guard.
it has not been reviewed by the Office
We received two submissions of Management and Budget. C. Collection of Information
commenting on the SNPRM. One This regulatory action determination
comment requested that any is based on the ability that vessels can This rule calls for no new collection
modification to the existing rule should still transit the bridge given advanced of information under the Paperwork
not be extended past the initiation of notice. The vertical clearance under the Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
construction of a new replacement bridge in the closed position is 3520).
bridge. The Coast Guard disagrees. A relatively high enough to accommodate
replacement bridge is only in the D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
most vessel traffic during the time
planning stage at CDOT. Design and Government
periods the draw is closed during the
construction of a replacement project for morning and evening commuter rush A rule has implications for federalism
a bridge of this scale typically takes hours. under Executive Order 13132,
several years. As the timeline of a Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
potential bridge replacement is B. Impact on Small Entities
effect on the States, on the relationship
uncertain, the Coast Guard cannot The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
between the national government and
consider it within this rulemaking. (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
the States, or on the distribution of
One comment suggested the Coast requires federal agencies to consider the
power and responsibilities among the
Guard consider revising the AM peak potential impact of regulations on small
various levels of government. We have
window to end at 8:45 a.m. and revising entities during rulemaking. The term
analyzed this rule under that Order and
the PM peak window to begin at 4:15 ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations have determined that it is consistent
p.m. and end at 8:20 p.m. to better
accommodate commuters. The Coast that are independently owned and with the fundamental federalism
Guard believes that the proposed rule operated and are not dominant in their principles and preemption requirements
offers greater consideration to peak fields, and governmental jurisdictions described in E.O. 13132.
commuter train traffic by restricting with populations of less than 50,000. Also, this rule does not have tribal
bridge openings until 9:45 a.m. The The Coast Guard received no comments implications under Executive Order
Coast Guard also believes that the PM from the Small Business Administration 13175, Consultation and Coordination
peak revision of the proposed rule more on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies with Indian Tribal Governments,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

adequately addresses the concerns in under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will because it does not have a substantial
the comment by offering an additional not have a significant economic impact direct effect on one or more Indian
15 minutes on the front end by on a substantial number of small tribes, on the relationship between the
restricting bridge openings starting at 4 entities. While some owners or Federal Government and Indian tribes,
p.m. In addition, while the train operators of vessels intending to transit or on the distribution of power and
schedules do adjust twice annually, the bridge may be small entities, for the responsibilities between the Federal
only one train crosses the bridge reasons stated in section V.A above this Government and Indian tribes.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1

45022 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act § 117.217 Norwalk River. from June 22, 2016 through July 12,
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act * * * * * 2016. Comments and related material
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires (b) The draw of the Metro-North must be received by the Coast Guard on
Federal agencies to assess the effects of ‘‘WALK’’ Bridge, mile 0.1, at Norwalk, or before August 11, 2016.
their discretionary regulatory actions. In shall operate as follows: ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
particular, the Act addresses actions (1) The draw shall open on signal identified by docket number USCG–
that may result in the expenditure by a between 4:30 a.m. and 9 p.m. after at 2016–0462 using the Federal e-
State, local, or tribal government, in the least a two hour advance notice is given; Rulemaking Portal at http://
aggregate, or by the private sector of except that, from 5:45 a.m. through 9:45 www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or a.m. and from 4 p.m. through 8 p.m., Participation and Request for
more in any one year. Though this rule Monday through Friday excluding Comments’’ portion of the
will not result in such expenditure, we holidays, the draw need not open for the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
do discuss the effects of this rule passage of vessel traffic unless an further instructions on submitting
elsewhere in this preamble. emergency exists. comments.
(2) From 9 p.m. through 4:30 a.m. the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
F. Environment draw shall open on signal after at least you have questions on this rule, call or
We have analyzed this rule under a four hour advance notice is given. email MST1 Kristina Pundt, Waterways
Department of Homeland Security (3) A delay in opening the draw not
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Management Directive 023–01 and to exceed 10 minutes may occur when
Guard; telephone 718–354–4352, email
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, a train scheduled to cross the bridge
Kristina.H.Pundt@uscg.mil.
which guides the Coast Guard in without stopping has entered the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
complying with the National drawbridge lock.
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (4) Requests for bridge openings may I. Table of Abbreviations
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and be made by calling the bridge via marine
COTP Captain of the Port
have made a determination that this radio VHF FM Channel 13 or the CFR Code of Federal Regulations
action is one of a category of actions telephone number posted at the bridge. DHS Department of Homeland Security
which do not individually or Dated: June 23, 2016. FR Federal Register
cumulatively have a significant effect on S.D. Poulin, NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NYSTA New York State Thruway Authority
the human environment. This rule Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, § Section
simply promulgates the operating First Coast Guard District. U.S.C. United States Code
regulations or procedures for [FR Doc. 2016–16226 Filed 7–11–16; 8:45 am]
drawbridges. This action is categorically BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
II. Background Information and
excluded from further review, under Regulatory History
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the The Coast Guard is issuing this
Instruction. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND temporary rule without prior notice and
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of SECURITY opportunity to comment pursuant to
the Instruction, an environmental authority under section 4(a) of the
analysis checklist and a categorical Coast Guard Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
exclusion determination are not U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
required for this rule. 33 CFR Part 165 authorizes an agency to issue a rule
G. Protest Activities [Docket Number USCG–2016–0462] without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
The Coast Guard respects the First RIN 1625–AA00 cause finds that those procedures are
Amendment rights of protesters. ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
Protesters are asked to contact the Safety Zone; Hudson River, South
Nyack and Tarrytown, NY to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
person listed in the FOR FURTHER 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
INFORMATION CONTACT section to AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. good cause exists for not publishing a
coordinate protest activities so that your ACTION: Temporary interim final rule. NPRM with respect to this rule because
message can be received without publishing a NPRM would be
jeopardizing the safety or security of SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is impracticable. A delay or cancellation of
people, places or vessels. establishing a temporary moving safety the currently ongoing bridge project in
zone for navigable waters of the Hudson order to accommodate a full notice and
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
River within a 200-yard radius of the comment period would delay necessary
Bridges. LEFT COAST LIFTER crane barge operations, result in increased costs,
For the reasons discussed in the during heavy lift operations. The safety and delay the date when the bridge is
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 zone is needed to protect personnel, expected to reopen for normal
CFR part 117 as follows: vessels, and the marine environment operations. For these reasons, the Coast
from potential hazards created by heavy Guard finds it impracticable to delay
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE lift operations conducted by the crane this regulation for purposes of a
OPERATION REGULATIONS barge in the vicinity of the Tappan Zee comment period.
Bridge. Entry of vessels or persons into We are issuing this rule, and under 5
■ 1. The authority citation for part 117
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

this zone is prohibited unless U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
continues to read as follows: specifically authorized by the Captain of that good cause exists for making it
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; the Port. effective less than 30 days after
Department of Homeland Security Delegation DATES: This rule is effective without publication in the Federal Register.
No. 0170.1. actual notice from July 12, 2016 through Delaying the effective date of this rule
■ 2. Revise § 117.217, paragraph (b), to December 31, 2018. For the purposes of would be impracticable for the same
read as follows: enforcement, actual notice will be used reasons specified above.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM 12JYR1

Document Created: 2016-07-12 01:59:22
Document Modified: 2016-07-12 01:59:22

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective August 11, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Christopher J. Bisignano, Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District, Coast Guard; telephone (212) 514-4331 or email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 45020
RIN Number		1625-AA09

81 FR 45020 - Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Norwalk River, Norwalk, CT

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard