81 FR 45124 - Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4 1/2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 45124-45125 | |
| FR Document | 2016-16473 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 45124-45125] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-16473] [[Page 45124]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-851] Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4 \1/2\ Inches) From Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request from the petitioner,\1\ the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (under 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan. The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015.\2\ The review covers five producers or exporters of subject merchandise.\3\ We preliminarily find that NKK Tubes (NKK) had no shipments during the POR. Further, we preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold at less than normal value by JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The petitioner is United States Steel Corporation. \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 45947 (August 3, 2015). \3\ The five producers or exporters are: JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), NKK Tubes (NKK), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective July 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2778 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Government. As a result, the revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review was March 7, 2016.\4\ On March 2, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to July 5, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm `Jonas,''' dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with the Department's practice, the deadline will become the next business day. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is certain small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (under 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan, which is currently classified under subheading 7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under 4 \1/2\ Inches) from Japan; 2014-2015 Administrative Review'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an adverse inference with respect to NSSMC, the sole company selected for individual examination in this review, and we preliminarily assign to it a dumping margin of 106.07 percent. In making these findings, we relied on facts available because NSSMC failed to respond to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaire, and thus withheld requested information, failed to provide requested information by the established deadlines, and significantly impeded this proceeding. See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(C) of the Act. Furthermore, because we preliminarily determine that NSSMC failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the Department's requests for information, we drew an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available. See section 776(b) of the Act. Additionally, as indicated in the ``Preliminary Results of Review'' section below, we preliminarily determine that a margin of 106.07 percent applies to the three firms not selected for individual review. For further information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies.'' For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the Appendix attached to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at: http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information and information provided by NKK, we preliminarily determine that NKK had no shipments of the subject merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable transactions, during the POR. For a full discussion of this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent with our practice, we are not preliminarily rescinding the review with respect to NKK but, rather, we will complete the review with respect to this company and issue appropriate instructions to [[Page 45125]] CBP based on the final results of this review.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at 51306 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that the following dumping margins on certain small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (under 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan exist for the period June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015, at the following rates: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Producer and/or Exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JFE Steel Corporation................................... 106.07 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation............... 106.07 Nippon Steel Corporation................................ 106.07 Sumitomo Metals Industries.............................. 106.07 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\7\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\8\ Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using ACCESS.\9\ An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the date the document is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \9\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 106.07 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by NSSMC, and an ad valorem assessment rate of 106.07 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by the three aforementioned companies which were not selected for individual examination.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at section V.b ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies'' (for an explanation of how we preliminarily determined the rate for non-selected companies). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of certain small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (under 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than- fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 70.43 percent, the all-others rate established in the order.\11\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notifications to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 5, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments V. Discussion of Methodology a. Use of Facts Otherwise Available i. Use of Facts Available ii. Application of Facts Available with and Adverse Inference iii. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used as Facts Available b. Rate for Non-Examined Companies VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-16473 Filed 7-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![45124 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE preliminary results of this review was failed to respond to the Department’s
March 7, 2016.4 On March 2, 2016, the antidumping duty questionnaire, and
International Trade Administration Department extended the deadline for thus withheld requested information,
[A–588–851] the preliminary results to July 5, 2016. failed to provide requested information
by the established deadlines, and
Scope of the Order
Certain Small Diameter Carbon and significantly impeded this proceeding.
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and The merchandise subject to the See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(C) of
Pressure Pipe (Under 4 1⁄2 Inches) antidumping duty order is certain small the Act. Furthermore, because we
From Japan: Preliminary Results of diameter carbon and alloy seamless preliminarily determine that NSSMC
Antidumping Duty Administrative standard, line, and pressure pipe (under failed to cooperate by not acting to the
Review and Preliminary Determination 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan, which is best of its ability to comply with the
of No Shipments; 2014–2015 currently classified under subheading Department’s requests for information,
7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, we drew an adverse inference in
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, selecting from among the facts
International Trade Administration, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, otherwise available. See section 776(b)
Department of Commerce. 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, of the Act.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, Additionally, as indicated in the
the petitioner,1 the Department of 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ section
Commerce (the Department) is 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, below, we preliminarily determine that
conducting an administrative review of 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, a margin of 106.07 percent applies to
the antidumping duty order on certain 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, the three firms not selected for
small diameter carbon and alloy 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, individual review. For further
seamless standard, line, and pressure 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, information, see the Preliminary
pipe (under 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan. 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, Decision Memorandum at ‘‘Rate for
The period of review (POR) is June 1, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, Non-Examined Companies.’’
2014, through May 31, 2015.2 The 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60,
For a full description of the
review covers five producers or 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00,
methodology underlying our
exporters of subject merchandise.3 We 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35,
conclusions, see the Preliminary
preliminarily find that NKK Tubes 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45,
Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
(NKK) had no shipments during the 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55,
included in the Preliminary Decision
POR. Further, we preliminarily find that 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and
Memorandum is included in the
subject merchandise has been sold at 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized Tariff
Appendix attached to this notice.
less than normal value by JFE Steel Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
The Preliminary Decision
Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Although the HTSUS subheadings are
Memorandum is a public document and
Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), provided for convenience and customs
is on file electronically via Enforcement
Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), and purposes, the written description of the
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). merchandise subject to the order is
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Interested parties are invited to dispositive.5
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
comment on these preliminary results. Methodology ACCESS is available to registered users
DATES: Effective July 12, 2016. at http://access.trade.gov and to all
In accordance with sections 776(a)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: parties in the Central Records Unit,
and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ room B8024 of the main Department of
amended (the Act), we relied on facts
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Commerce building. In addition, a
available with an adverse inference with
and Compliance, International Trade complete version of the Preliminary
respect to NSSMC, the sole company
Administration, U.S. Department of Decision Memorandum can be accessed
selected for individual examination in
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution directly on the Internet at: http://
this review, and we preliminarily assign
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
to it a dumping margin of 106.07
telephone: (202) 482–2778 or (202) 482– A list of the topics discussed in the
percent. In making these findings, we
0189, respectively. Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
relied on facts available because NSSMC
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: attached as an Appendix to this notice.
4 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
Background Preliminary Determination of No
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
As explained in the memorandum Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Shipments
from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
Government Closure During Snowstorm ‘Jonas,’’’
Enforcement and Compliance, the dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on and Border Protection (CBP)
Department exercised its discretion to a non-business day, in accordance with the information and information provided
toll all administrative deadlines due to Department’s practice, the deadline will become the by NKK, we preliminarily determine
a closure of the Federal Government. As next business day. that NKK had no shipments of the
5 For a full description of the scope of the order,
a result, the revised deadline for the subject merchandise, and, therefore, no
see the ‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty reviewable transactions, during the
1 The petitioner is United States Steel
Order on Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy POR. For a full discussion of this
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Corporation. Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Under
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
determination, see the Preliminary
4 1⁄2 Inches) from Japan; 2014–2015 Administrative
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR Review’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Decision Memorandum. Consistent with
45947 (August 3, 2015). Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and our practice, we are not preliminarily
3 The five producers or exporters are: JFE Steel Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. rescinding the review with respect to
Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for NKK but, rather, we will complete the
Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
(NSC), NKK Tubes (NKK), and Sumitomo Metal with this notice (Preliminary Decision
review with respect to this company
Industries, Ltd. (SMI). Memorandum). and issue appropriate instructions to
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_45257/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Notices 45125
CBP based on the final results of this Issues raised in the hearing will be nor the manufacturer has its own rate,
review.6 limited to those raised in the respective the cash deposit rate will continue to be
case briefs. 70.43 percent, the all-others rate
Preliminary Results of Review The Department intends to issue the established in the order.11 These deposit
As a result of our review, we final results of this administrative requirements, when imposed, shall
preliminarily determine that the review, including the results of its remain in effect until further notice.
following dumping margins on certain analysis of the issues raised in any
small diameter carbon and alloy written briefs, not later than 120 days Notifications to Importers
seamless standard, line, and pressure after the date of publication of this
pipe (under 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) This notice serves as a preliminary
exist for the period June 1, 2014, of the Act. reminder to importers of their
through May 31, 2015, at the following responsibility under 19 CFR
rates: Assessment Rates 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
Upon issuance of the final results, the regarding the reimbursement of
Producer and/or Exporter Margin Department shall determine, and CBP antidumping duties prior to liquidation
(percent) shall assess, antidumping duties on all of the relevant entries during this
appropriate entries covered by this review period. Failure to comply with
JFE Steel Corporation .......... 106.07
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo review. If the preliminary results are this requirement could result in the
Metal Corporation ............. 106.07 unchanged for the final results we will Secretary’s presumption that
Nippon Steel Corporation ..... 106.07 instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem reimbursement of antidumping duties
Sumitomo Metals Industries 106.07 assessment rate of 106.07 percent to all occurred and the subsequent assessment
entries of subject merchandise during of doubled antidumping duties.
Disclosure and Public Comment the POR which were produced and/or
exported by NSSMC, and an ad valorem Notification to Interested Parties
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
assessment rate of 106.07 percent to all
interested parties may submit case briefs This notice is issued and published in
entries of subject merchandise during
not later than 30 days after the date of accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
the POR which were produced and/or
publication of this notice. Rebuttal 777(i)(1) of the Act.
exported by the three aforementioned
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
companies which were not selected for Dated: July 5, 2016.
case briefs, may be filed not later than
individual examination.10
five days after the date for filing case Ronald K. Lorentzen,
We intend to issue liquidation
briefs. Parties who submit case briefs or
7
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
instructions to CBP 15 days after
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are and Compliance.
publication of the final results of
encouraged to submit with each
review. Appendix
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; Cash Deposit Requirements List of Topics Discussed in Preliminary
and (3) a table of authorities.8 Interested The following deposit requirements Decision Memorandum
parties who wish to comment on the will be effective upon publication of the I. Summary
preliminary results must file briefs notice of final results of administrative II. Background
electronically using ACCESS.9 An review for all shipments of certain small III. Scope of the Order
electronically-filed document must be diameter carbon and alloy seamless IV. Preliminary Determination of No
received successfully in its entirety in standard, line, and pressure pipe (under Shipments
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan entered, or V. Discussion of Methodology
on the date the document is due. withdrawn from warehouse, for a. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), consumption on or after the date of i. Use of Facts Available
interested parties who wish to request a publication, as provided by section
ii. Application of Facts Available with and
hearing, or to participate if one is 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit Adverse Inference
requested, must submit a written rates for the reviewed companies will be iii. Selection and Corroboration of
request to the Assistant Secretary for the rates established in the final results Information Used as Facts Available
Enforcement and Compliance, filed of this review; (2) for merchandise b. Rate for Non-Examined Companies
electronically via ACCESS, within 30 exported by manufacturers or exporters VI. Recommendation
days after the date of publication of this not covered in this review but covered
[FR Doc. 2016–16473 Filed 7–11–16; 8:45 am]
notice. Requests should contain: (1) The in a prior segment of the proceeding, the
party’s name, address and telephone BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
number; (2) the number of participants; company-specific rate published for the
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
6 See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
firm covered in this review, a prior
From Thailand; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
review, or the less-than-fair-value
Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of investigation but the manufacturer is,
No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 the cash deposit rate will be the rate
(March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen established for the most recently
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
completed segment of this proceeding
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial for the manufacturer of the 11 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders:
Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR at 51306 merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
(August 28, 2014). Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
10 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
8 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
section V.b ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies’’ Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and
requirements). (for an explanation of how we preliminarily the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26,
9 Id. determined the rate for non-selected companies). 2000).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_45257/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-12 01:59:27
Document Modified: 2016-07-12 01:59:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective July 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2778 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 45124 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR