81 FR 45126 - Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4 1/2
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 133 (July 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 45126-45127 | |
| FR Document | 2016-16474 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 45126-45127] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-16474] [[Page 45126]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-588-850] Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4 \1/2\ Inches) From Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request from the petitioner,\1\ the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan. The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015.\2\ The review covers five producers or exporters of subject merchandise.\3\ We preliminarily find that NKK Tubes (NKK) had no shipments during the POR. Further, we preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold at less than normal value by JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The petitioner is United States Steel Corporation. \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 45947 (August 3, 2015). \3\ The five producers or exporters are: JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), NKK Tubes (NKK), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective July 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2778 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Government. As a result, the revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review was March 7, 2016.\4\ On March 2, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to July 5, 2016.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm `Jonas,''' dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with the Department's practice, the deadline will become the next business day. \5\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Certain Large Diameter Carbon Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe (over 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' (March 2, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4 \1/2\ inches) from Japan, which is currently classified under subheading 7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4 \1/2\ Inches) from Japan; 2014-2015 Administrative Review'' from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an adverse inference with respect to NSSMC, the sole company selected for individual examination in this review, and we preliminarily assign to it a dumping margin of 107.80 percent. In making these findings, we relied on facts available because NSSMC failed to respond to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaire, and thus withheld requested information, failed to provide requested information by the established deadlines, and significantly impeded this proceeding. See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)-(C) of the Act. Furthermore, because we preliminarily determine that NSSMC failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with the Department's requests for information, we drew an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available. See section 776(b) of the Act. Additionally, as indicated in the ``Preliminary Results of Review'' section below, we preliminarily determine that a margin of 107.8 percent applies to the three firms not selected for individual review. For further information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum at ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies.'' For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in the Appendix attached to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at: http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information and information provided by NKK, we preliminarily determine that NKK had no shipments of the subject merchandise, and, therefore, no reviewable transactions, during the POR. For a full discussion of this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Consistent with our practice, we are not preliminarily [[Page 45127]] rescinding the review with respect to NKK but, rather, we will complete the review with respect to this company and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR at 51306 (August 28, 2014). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review As a result of our review, we preliminarily determine that the following dumping margins on certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/2\ inches) from Japan exist for the period June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015, at the following rates: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Producer and/or Exporter (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JFE Steel Corporation................................... 107.80 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation............... 107.80 Nippon Steel Corporation................................ 107.80 Sumitomo Metals Industries.............................. 107.80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using ACCESS.\10\ An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety in ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on the date the document is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the preliminary results are unchanged for the final results we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by NSSMC, and an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by the three aforementioned companies which were not selected for individual examination.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at section V.b ``Rate for Non-Examined Companies'' (for an explanation of how we preliminarily determined the rate for non-selected companies). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/2\ inches) from Japan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than- fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 68.88 percent, the all-others rate established in the order.\12\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notifications to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 5, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments V. Discussion of Methodology a. Use of Facts Otherwise Available i. Use of Facts Available ii. Application of Facts Available With and Adverse Inference iii. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used as Facts Available b. Rate for Non-Examined Companies VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-16474 Filed 7-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![45126 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE preliminary results of this review was respect to NSSMC, the sole company
March 7, 2016.4 On March 2, 2016, the selected for individual examination in
International Trade Administration Department extended the deadline for this review, and we preliminarily assign
[A–588–850] the preliminary results to July 5, 2016.5 to it a dumping margin of 107.80
percent. In making these findings, we
Scope of the Order
Certain Large Diameter Carbon and relied on facts available because NSSMC
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and The merchandise subject to the failed to respond to the Department’s
Pressure Pipe (Over 4 1⁄2 Inches) From antidumping duty order is certain large antidumping duty questionnaire, and
Japan: Preliminary Results of diameter carbon and alloy seamless thus withheld requested information,
Antidumping Duty Administrative standard, line, and pressure pipe (over failed to provide requested information
Review and Preliminary Determination 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan, which is by the established deadlines, and
of No Shipments; 2014–2015 currently classified under subheading significantly impeded this proceeding.
7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, See sections 776(a)(1) and (2)(A)–(C) of
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, the Act. Furthermore, because we
International Trade Administration, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, preliminarily determine that NSSMC
Department of Commerce. 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, failed to cooperate by not acting to the
SUMMARY: In response to a request from 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, best of its ability to comply with the
the petitioner,1 the Department of 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, Department’s requests for information,
Commerce (the Department) is 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, we drew an adverse inference in
conducting an administrative review of 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, selecting from among the facts
the antidumping duty order on certain 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, otherwise available. See section 776(b)
large diameter carbon and alloy 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, of the Act.
seamless standard, line, and pressure 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, Additionally, as indicated in the
pipe (over 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan. The 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ section
period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, below, we preliminarily determine that
through May 31, 2015.2 The review 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60, a margin of 107.8 percent applies to the
covers five producers or exporters of 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, three firms not selected for individual
subject merchandise.3 We preliminarily 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, review. For further information, see the
find that NKK Tubes (NKK) had no 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
shipments during the POR. Further, we 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies.’’
preliminarily find that subject 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and For a full description of the
merchandise has been sold at less than 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized Tariff methodology underlying our
normal value by JFE Steel Corporation Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). conclusions, see the Preliminary
(JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Although the HTSUS subheadings are Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel provided for convenience and customs included in the Preliminary Decision
Corporation (NSC), and Sumitomo purposes, the written description of the Memorandum is included in the
Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). Interested merchandise subject to the order is Appendix attached to this notice.
parties are invited to comment on these dispositive.6 The Preliminary Decision
preliminary results. Memorandum is a public document and
Methodology
DATES: Effective July 12, 2016. is on file electronically via Enforcement
In accordance with sections 776(a) and Compliance’s Antidumping and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Countervailing Duty Centralized
Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ amended (the Act), we relied on facts Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement available with an adverse inference with ACCESS is available to registered users
and Compliance, International Trade
at http://access.trade.gov and to all
Administration, U.S. Department of 4 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
room B8024 of the main Department of
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of
Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Commerce building. In addition, a
telephone: (202) 482–2778 or (202) 482– Government Closure During Snowstorm ‘Jonas,’’’ complete version of the Preliminary
0189, respectively. dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on Decision Memorandum can be accessed
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: a non-business day, in accordance with the
Department’s practice, the deadline will become the directly on the Internet at: http://
Background next business day. enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
5 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
A list of the topics discussed in the
As explained in the memorandum Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain Large
Diameter Carbon Alloy Seamless Standard, Line attached as an Appendix to this notice.
Enforcement and Compliance, the
and Pressure Pipe (over 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan:
Department exercised its discretion to Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
Preliminary Determination of No
toll all administrative deadlines due to Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ (March Shipments
a closure of the Federal Government. As 2, 2016).
Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs
a result, the revised deadline for the 6 For a full description of the scope of the order,
and Border Protection (CBP)
see the ‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the
1 The petitioner is United States Steel
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty information and information provided
Order on Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy by NKK, we preliminarily determine
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Corporation. Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and that NKK had no shipments of the
4 1⁄2 Inches) from Japan; 2014–2015 Administrative
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR Review’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy subject merchandise, and, therefore, no
45947 (August 3, 2015). Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and reviewable transactions, during the
3 The five producers or exporters are: JFE Steel Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. POR. For a full discussion of this
Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
determination, see the Preliminary
(NSC), NKK Tubes (NKK), and Sumitomo Metal with this notice (Preliminary Decision Decision Memorandum. Consistent with
Industries, Ltd. (SMI). Memorandum). our practice, we are not preliminarily
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_45259/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 133 / Tuesday, July 12, 2016 / Notices 45127
rescinding the review with respect to party’s name, address and telephone completed segment of this proceeding
NKK but, rather, we will complete the number; (2) the number of participants; for the manufacturer of the
review with respect to this company and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter
and issue appropriate instructions to Issues raised in the hearing will be nor the manufacturer has its own rate,
CBP based on the final results of this limited to those raised in the respective the cash deposit rate will continue to be
review.7 case briefs. 68.88 percent, the all-others rate
The Department intends to issue the established in the order.12 These deposit
Preliminary Results of Review final results of this administrative requirements, when imposed, shall
As a result of our review, we review, including the results of its
preliminarily determine that the remain in effect until further notice.
analysis of the issues raised in any
following dumping margins on certain written briefs, not later than 120 days Notifications to Importers
large diameter carbon and alloy after the date of publication of this
seamless standard, line, and pressure notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) This notice serves as a preliminary
pipe (over 41⁄2 inches) from Japan exist of the Act. reminder to importers of their
for the period June 1, 2014, through May responsibility under 19 CFR
31, 2015, at the following rates: Assessment Rates
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
Upon issuance of the final results, the regarding the reimbursement of
Producer and/or Exporter Margin Department shall determine, and CBP antidumping duties prior to liquidation
(percent) shall assess, antidumping duties on all of the relevant entries during this
appropriate entries covered by this review period. Failure to comply with
JFE Steel Corporation .......... 107.80
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo review. If the preliminary results are this requirement could result in the
Metal Corporation ............. 107.80 unchanged for the final results we will Secretary’s presumption that
Nippon Steel Corporation ..... 107.80 instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem reimbursement of antidumping duties
Sumitomo Metals Industries 107.80 assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all
occurred and the subsequent assessment
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR which were produced and/or of doubled antidumping duties.
Disclosure and Public Comment
exported by NSSMC, and an ad valorem Notification to Interested Parties
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all
interested parties may submit case briefs
entries of subject merchandise during This notice is issued and published in
not later than 30 days after the date of
the POR which were produced and/or accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
exported by the three aforementioned 777(i)(1) of the Act.
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
companies which were not selected for
case briefs, may be filed not later than Dated: July 5, 2016.
individual examination.11
five days after the date for filing case Ronald K. Lorentzen,
We intend to issue liquidation
briefs.8 Parties who submit case briefs or Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
instructions to CBP 15 days after
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are and Compliance.
publication of the final results of
encouraged to submit with each
review. Appendix
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; Cash Deposit Requirements List of Topics Discussed in Preliminary
and (3) a table of authorities.9 Interested The following deposit requirements Decision Memorandum
parties who wish to comment on the will be effective upon publication of the
preliminary results must file briefs I. Summary
notice of final results of administrative II. Background
electronically using ACCESS.10 An review for all shipments of certain large III. Scope of the Order
electronically-filed document must be diameter carbon and alloy seamless IV. Preliminary Determination of No
received successfully in its entirety in standard, line, and pressure pipe (over Shipments
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) 41⁄2 inches) from Japan entered, or V. Discussion of Methodology
on the date the document is due. withdrawn from warehouse, for
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), a. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
consumption on or after the date of i. Use of Facts Available
interested parties who wish to request a publication, as provided by section
ii. Application of Facts Available With and
hearing, or to participate if one is 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit Adverse Inference
requested, must submit a written rates for the reviewed companies will be iii. Selection and Corroboration of
request to the Assistant Secretary for the rates established in the final results Information Used as Facts Available
Enforcement and Compliance, filed of this review; (2) for merchandise b. Rate for Non-Examined Companies
electronically via ACCESS, within 30 exported by manufacturers or exporters VI. Recommendation
days after the date of publication of this not covered in this review but covered
notice. Requests should contain: (1) The in a prior segment of the proceeding, the [FR Doc. 2016–16474 Filed 7–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
7 See e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
company-specific rate published for the
From Thailand; Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial
most recently completed segment of this
Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
No Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 firm covered in this review, a prior
(March 24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen review, or the less-than-fair-value
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
investigation but the manufacturer is,
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial the cash deposit rate will be the rate 12 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders:
Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR at 51306 established for the most recently Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
(August 28, 2014). Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
11 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless
9 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
section V.b ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies’’ Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and
requirements). (for an explanation of how we preliminarily the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26,
10 Id. determined the rate for non-selected companies). 2000).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:30 Jul 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_45259/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-12 01:59:17
Document Modified: 2016-07-12 01:59:17
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective July 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jennifer Shore or Peter Zukowski, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 2778 or (202) 482-0189, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 45126 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR