81 FR 47027 - Safety Zone; Houma Navigation Canal Miles 23 to 23.5, Dulac, LA
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 139 (July 20, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 139 (July 20, 2016)
| Page Range | 47027-47029 | |
| FR Document | 2016-17035 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 47027-47029] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-17035] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0650] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Houma Navigation Canal Miles 23 to 23.5, Dulac, LA AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Temporary final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all navigable waters surface to bottom, of the Houma Navigation Canal from mile marker 23 to 23.5. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by replacement work of the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Morgan City or a designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 20, 2016 through July 27, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 7, 2016 through July 20, 2016. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2016-0650 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, contact MSTC Justin Helton, Marine Safety Unit Houma, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 985-850-6457, email [email protected]. [[Page 47028]] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code MM Mile Marker II. Background Information and Regulatory History The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive notice of the bridge repairs until June 21, 2016. Completing the NPRM process would delay the immediate action needed to protect the public from hazards associated with the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge replacement. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety zone by July 7, 2016. We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Providing 30 days notice for this occurrence would unnecessarily delay the effective date and would be impracticable based on the limited time frame, as well as be contrary to public interest because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the replacement of the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The Captain of the Port Morgan City (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge replacement between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from July 7 through July 27, 2016 will be a safety concern for anyone within the area extending from MM 23 to 23.5 of the Houma Navigation Canal. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge is being replaced. IV. Discussion of the Rule This rule establishes a safety zone from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. from July 7 through July 27, 2016. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters, surface to bottom, of the Houma Navigation Canal from MM 23 to 23.5. The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters while the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge is being repaired. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, duration, and specific times of enforcement for the temporary safety zone. The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters while the Falgout Canal Pontoon Bridge is being replaced. This temporary safety zone will be enforced during specific times during daylight hours for bridge replacement operations only, and limits access to a small area on the waterway covering one-half mile. Vessels will be able to request passage through area from the COTP. Additionally, there will be a break in operation allowing any build up of traffic to pass on a once daily basis. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). [[Page 47029]] D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone, during daylight hours, lasting less than 13 hours per day for 21 days that will prohibit entry into or transit within MM 23 to 23.5 of the Houma Navigation Canal. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0650 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T08-0650 Safety zone; Houma Navigation Canal between mile 23 to 23.5, Dulac, LA. (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All waters of the Houma Navigation Canal, surface to bottom, between mile 23 and mile 23.5, Dulac, LA. (b) Enforcement period. This safety zone will be enforced from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 7 through July 27, 2016. (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23, entry into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Morgan City (COTP) or designated personnel. Persons or vessels desiring to enter into or pass through the zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM radio channel 13 and 16 or phone at 504-343-7928. (2) Persons and vessels permitted to deviate from this safety zone regulation and enter the restricted area must transit at the slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or the designated representative. (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the temporary safety zone as well as any changes in the planned schedule. Dated: July 1, 2016. B.E. Welborn, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Morgan City. [FR Doc. 2016-17035 Filed 7-19-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47027
10¥4 would be exceeded if one person threshold, the applicant’s proposed launch aircraft, from each proposed reentry
were present in the open. site will fail the launch site location review. does not exceed an expected number of
* * * * * 1 × 10¥4 casualties from impacting inert
PART 431—LAUNCH AND REENTRY and explosive debris and toxic release
■ 6. In § 420.25, revise paragraph (b) to OF A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE associated with the reentry; and
read as follows: (RLV) (c) The risk level to an individual
§ 420.25 Launch site location review—risk ■ 9. The authority citation for part 431 does not exceed 1 × 10¥6 probability of
analysis.
continues to read as follows: casualty per mission.
* * * * * Issued under authority provided by 49
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
(b) For licensed launches, the FAA U.S.C. 106(f), and 51 U.S.C. 50903, 50905 in
will not approve the location of the ■ 10. In § 431.35, revise paragraph (b)(1) Washington, DC, on July 11, 2016.
proposed launch point if the estimated to read as follows: Michael P. Huerta,
expected casualty exceeds 1 × 10¥4. Administrator.
§ 431.35 Acceptable reusable launch
■ 7. In Appendix C to part 420, revise vehicle risk. [FR Doc. 2016–17083 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
paragraphs (a)(2) and (d)(1) and (2) to * * * * * BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
read as follows: (b) * * *
Appendix C to Part 420—Risk Analysis (1) To obtain safety approval, an
applicant must demonstrate the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
(a) * * * following for public risk: SECURITY
(2) An applicant shall perform a risk
analysis when a populated area is located
(i) The risk to the collective members
of the public from the proposed launch Coast Guard
within a flight corridor defined by either
appendix A or appendix B. If the estimated meets the public risk criteria of
§ 417.107(b)(1) of this chapter; 33 CFR Part 165
expected casualty exceeds 1 × 10¥4, an
applicant may either modify its proposal, or (ii) The risk level to the collective [Docket Number USCG–2016–0650]
if the flight corridor used was generated by members of the public, excluding
the appendix A method, use the appendix B RIN 1625–AA00
persons in water-borne vessels and
method to narrow the flight corridor and then aircraft, from each proposed reentry
redo the overflight risk analysis pursuant to Safety Zone; Houma Navigation Canal
does not exceed an expected number of Miles 23 to 23.5, Dulac, LA
this appendix. If the estimated expected
1 × 10¥4 casualties from impacting inert
casualty still exceeds 1 × 10¥4, the FAA will
not approve the location of the proposed and explosive debris and toxic release AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
launch point. associated with the reentry; and ACTION: Temporary final rule.
(iii) The risk level to an individual
* * * * *
(d) * * * does not exceed 1 × 10¥6 probability of SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
(1) If the estimated expected casualty does casualty per mission. establishing a temporary safety zone for
not exceed 1 × 10¥4, the FAA will approve * * * * * all navigable waters surface to bottom,
the launch site location. ■ 11. In § 431.43, revise paragraph (d)(2) of the Houma Navigation Canal from
(2) If the estimated expected casualty to read as follows: mile marker 23 to 23.5. The safety zone
exceeds 1 × 10¥4, then an applicant may is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
either modify its proposal, or, if the flight * * * * *
and the marine environment from
corridor used was generated by the appendix (d) * * *
potential hazards created by
A method, use the appendix B method to (2) The expected number of casualties
replacement work of the Falgout Canal
narrow the flight corridor and then perform to members of the public does not
Pontoon Bridge. Entry of vessels or
another appendix C risk analysis. exceed 1 × 10¥4 given a probability of
persons into this zone is prohibited
vehicle failure equal to 1 (pf=1) at any
■ 8. In Appendix D to part 420, revise unless specifically authorized by the
time the IIP is over a populated area;
paragraphs (a)(5) and (e)(2) and (3) to Captain of the Port Morgan City or a
* * * * * designated representative.
read as follows:
PART 435— REENTRY OF A REENTRY DATES: This rule is effective without
Appendix D to Part 420—Impact
Dispersion Areas and Casualty VEHICLE OTHER THAN A REUSABLE actual notice from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00
Expectancy Estimate for an Unguided LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV) p.m. daily from July 20, 2016 through
Suborbital Launch Vehicle July 27, 2016. For the purposes of
■ 12. The authority citation for part 435 enforcement, actual notice will be used
(a) * * * continues to read as follows: from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily
(5) If the estimated Ec is less than or equal from July 7, 2016 through July 20, 2016.
to 1 × 10¥4, the FAA will approve the launch Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
point for unguided suborbital launch ADDRESSES: To view documents
■ 13. Revise § 435.35 to read as follows:
vehicles. If the estimated Ec exceeds 1 × mentioned in this preamble as being
10¥4, the proposed launch point will fail the § 435.35 Acceptable reusable launch available in the docket, go to http://
launch site location review. vehicle risk. www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
* * * * * To obtain safety approval for reentry, 0650 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
(e) * * * an applicant must demonstrate the ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
(2) If the estimated expected casualty does following for public risk: Folder on the line associated with this
not exceed 1 × 10¥4, the FAA will approve (a) The risk to the collective members rule.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
the launch point. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
of the public from the proposed launch
(3) If the estimated expected casualty
exceeds 1 × 10¥4, then an applicant may meets the public risk criteria of you have questions on this rule, contact
modify its proposal and then repeat the § 417.107(b)(1) of this chapter; MSTC Justin Helton, Marine Safety Unit
impact risk analysis in accordance with this (b) The risk level to the collective Houma, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
appendix D. If no set of impact dispersion members of the public, excluding 985–850–6457, email Justin.K.Helton@
areas exist which satisfy the FAA’s risk persons in water-borne vessels and uscg.mil.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:53 Jul 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM 20JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47166/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47029
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Instruction. An environmental analysis at the slowest safe speed and comply
Governments checklist supporting this determination with all lawful directions issued by the
A rule has implications for federalism and a Categorical Exclusion COTP or the designated representative.
Determination are available in the (d) Informational broadcasts. The
under Executive Order 13132,
docket where indicated under COTP or a designated representative
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or will inform the public through
effect on the States, on the relationship
information that may lead to the broadcast notices to mariners of the
between the national government and
discovery of a significant environmental enforcement period for the temporary
the States, or on the distribution of
impact from this rule. safety zone as well as any changes in the
power and responsibilities among the
planned schedule.
various levels of government. We have G. Protest Activities
analyzed this rule under that Order and Dated: July 1, 2016.
The Coast Guard respects the First
have determined that it is consistent B.E. Welborn,
Amendment rights of protesters.
with the fundamental federalism Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Protesters are asked to contact the
principles and preemption requirements Port Morgan City.
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
described in Executive Order 13132. [FR Doc. 2016–17035 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Also, this rule does not have tribal BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
coordinate protest activities so that your
implications under Executive Order
message can be received without
13175, Consultation and Coordination
jeopardizing the safety or security of
with Indian Tribal Governments, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
people, places or vessels.
because it does not have a substantial AGENCY
direct effect on one or more Indian List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
tribes, on the relationship between the Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 40 CFR Part 52
Federal Government and Indian tribes, (water), Reporting and recordkeeping [EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0854; FRL–9949–00–
or on the distribution of power and requirements, Security measures, Region 10]
responsibilities between the Federal Waterways.
Government and Indian tribes. If you Air Plan Approval; Oregon; Medford
For the reasons discussed in the
believe this rule has implications for Area Carbon Monoxide Second 10-
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
federalism or Indian tribes, please Year Maintenance Plan
CFR part 165 as follows:
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section AGENCY: Environmental Protection
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
above. Agency (EPA).
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
ACTION: Direct final rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
continues to read as follows:
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; action to approve a second 10-year
Federal agencies to assess the effects of 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
their discretionary regulatory actions. In carbon monoxide (CO) limited
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
particular, the Act addresses actions maintenance plan (LMP) for the
No. 0170.1.
that may result in the expenditure by a Medford area in Oregon, submitted by
■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0650 to read as the Oregon Department of
State, local, or tribal government, in the
follows: Environmental Quality (tODEQ) on
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or § 165.T08–0650 Safety zone; Houma
December 11, 2015, along with a
more in any one year. Though this rule Navigation Canal between mile 23 to 23.5, supplementary submittal on December
will not result in such an expenditure, Dulac, LA. 30, 2015, as a revision to its State
we do discuss the effects of this rule (a) Location. The following area is a Implementation Plan (SIP). In
elsewhere in this preamble. temporary safety zone: All waters of the accordance with the requirements of the
Houma Navigation Canal, surface to Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA is
F. Environment approving this SIP revision because it
bottom, between mile 23 and mile 23.5,
We have analyzed this rule under Dulac, LA. demonstrates that the Medford area will
Department of Homeland Security (b) Enforcement period. This safety continue to meet the CO National
Management Directive 023–01 and zone will be enforced from 7:00 a.m. Ambient Air Quality Standards
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 7 through (NAAQS) for a second 10-year period
which guide the Coast Guard in July 27, 2016. beyond redesignation, through 2025.
complying with the National (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with DATES: This rule is effective on
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 the general regulations in § 165.23, entry September 19, 2016, without further
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have into this zone is prohibited unless notice, unless the EPA receives adverse
determined that this action is one of a specifically authorized by the Captain of comment by August 19, 2016. If the EPA
category of actions that do not the Port Morgan City (COTP) or receives adverse comment, we will
individually or cumulatively have a designated personnel. Persons or vessels publish a timely withdrawal in the
significant effect on the human desiring to enter into or pass through Federal Register informing the public
environment. This rule involves a safety the zone must request permission from that the rule will not take effect.
zone, during daylight hours, lasting less ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
the COTP or a designated
than 13 hours per day for 21 days that representative. They may be contacted identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
will prohibit entry into or transit within on VHF–FM radio channel 13 and 16 or OAR–2015–0854 at http://
MM 23 to 23.5 of the Houma Navigation phone at 504–343–7928. www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Canal. It is categorically excluded from (2) Persons and vessels permitted to Chi.John@epa.gov. For comments
further review under paragraph 34(g) of deviate from this safety zone regulation submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant and enter the restricted area must transit online instructions for submitting
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:53 Jul 19, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM 20JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47166/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:57:07
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:57:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective without actual notice from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 20, 2016 through July 27, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 7:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 7, 2016 through July 20, 2016. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, contact MSTC Justin Helton, Marine Safety Unit Houma, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 985-850-6457, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 47027 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR