81_FR_47168 81 FR 47029 - Air Plan Approval; Oregon; Medford Area Carbon Monoxide Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan

81 FR 47029 - Air Plan Approval; Oregon; Medford Area Carbon Monoxide Second 10-Year Maintenance Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 139 (July 20, 2016)

Page Range47029-47034
FR Document2016-17060

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a second 10-year carbon monoxide (CO) limited maintenance plan (LMP) for the Medford area in Oregon, submitted by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (tODEQ) on December 11, 2015, along with a supplementary submittal on December 30, 2015, as a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). In accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA is approving this SIP revision because it demonstrates that the Medford area will continue to meet the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for a second 10-year period beyond redesignation, through 2025.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47029-47034]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0854; FRL-9949-00-Region 10]


Air Plan Approval; Oregon; Medford Area Carbon Monoxide Second 
10-Year Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to approve a second 10-year carbon monoxide (CO) limited 
maintenance plan (LMP) for the Medford area in Oregon, submitted by the 
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (tODEQ) on December 11, 
2015, along with a supplementary submittal on December 30, 2015, as a 
revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP). In accordance with the 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA is approving this SIP 
revision because it demonstrates that the Medford area will continue to 
meet the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for a second 
10-year period beyond redesignation, through 2025.

DATES: This rule is effective on September 19, 2016, without further 
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by August 19, 2016. If 
the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal 
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not 
take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2015-0854 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 
online instructions for submitting

[[Page 47030]]

comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish 
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically 
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information 
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact 
the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. 
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or 
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective 
comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Chi, Air Planning Unit, Office of 
Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6th 
Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: 206-553-1185; email 
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. This Action
II. Background
III. Evaluation of Oregon's Submittal
    A. Base Year Emission Inventory
    B. Demonstration of Maintenance
    C. Control Measures
    D. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment
    E. Contingency Plan
    F. Transportation and General Conformity
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. This Action

    The EPA is approving the carbon monoxide limited maintenance plan 
(CO LMP) submitted by the ODEQ, on December 11, 2015, along with a 
supplementary submittal on December 30, 2015, (the submittal) for the 
Medford area. A LMP is a means of meeting Clean Air Act (CAA) 
requirements for formerly designated nonattainment areas that meet 
certain qualification criteria. This CO LMP is designed to keep the 
Medford area in attainment with the CO standard for a second 10-year 
period beyond redesignation, through 2025.

II. Background

    Under section 107(d)(1)(c) of the CAA, each CO area designated 
nonattainment prior to enactment of the 1990 Amendments, such as 
Medford, was designated nonattainment by operation of law upon 
enactment of the 1990 Amendments. Under section 186(a) of the CAA, each 
CO area designated nonattainment under section 107(d) was also 
classified by operation of law as either ``moderate'' or ``serious'' 
depending on the severity of the area's air quality problem. CO areas 
with design values between 9.1 and 16.4 parts per million (ppm), such 
as Medford, were classified as moderate. These nonattainment 
designations and classifications were codified in 40 CFR part 81 on 
November 6, 1991 (56 FR 56695).
    On July 24, 2002, the EPA approved the ODEQ's request to 
redesignate the Medford area to attainment of the CO standard (67 FR 
48388). In that action, the EPA also approved the maintenance plan 
required under CAA section 175A(a) to provide for 10 years of 
maintenance of the CO standard in the Medford area through the year 
2015 (67 FR 48388).
    As required by the CAA section 175A(b), the SIP submittal provides 
a second 10-year plan for maintaining the CO standard in the Medford 
area until 2025. For the second 10-year maintenance plan, the ODEQ 
chose the option as described in an EPA October 6, 1995 memorandum from 
Joseph Paisie, the Group Leader of the Integrated Policy and Strategies 
Group, titled, ``Limited Maintenance Plan Option for Nonclassifiable CO 
Nonattainment Areas'' (LMP Option). To qualify for the LMP Option, the 
CO design value for an area, based on the eight consecutive quarters 
(two years of data) used to demonstrate attainment, must be at or below 
7.65 ppm (85 percent of the CO NAAQS). In addition, the control 
measures from the first CO maintenance plan must remain in place.
    The EPA has determined that the LMP Option for CO is also available 
to all states as part of the CAA 175A(b) update to the maintenance 
plans, regardless of the original nonattainment classification, or lack 
thereof. Thus, the EPA finds that although the Medford area was 
designated as a moderate nonattainment area for the CO NAAQS, 
redesignation to attainment status in conjunction with meeting all 
requirements of the October 6, 1995, memorandum, allows the ODEQ to be 
eligible to submit a LMP as the update to its original maintenance plan 
per section 175A(b) of the CAA.

III. Evaluation of Oregon's Submittal

    The requirements of the LMP Option and the EPA's evaluation of how 
each requirement has been met by the ODEQ's submittal is summarized 
below.

A. Base Year Emission Inventory

    The LMP must contain an attainment year emissions inventory to 
identify a level of CO emissions in the area that is sufficiently low 
enough to attain the CO NAAQS. The submittal contains a summary of the 
CO emissions inventory for the Medford area for the base year 2008. The 
emission inventory lists CO emissions by general source category--
stationary point sources, stationary area sources, on-road mobile 
sources and non-road mobile sources. On-road mobile sources emissions 
for the 2008 base year inventory were estimated with the EPA's Motor 
Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 2010b.\1\ The methods used to 
determine the Medford area CO emission inventory are consistent with 
the EPA's most recent guidance on developing emission inventories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ MOVES2010b was the most current model available at the time 
that ODEQ was performing its analysis. The EPA released MOVES2014 on 
October 7, 2014 (79 FR 60343).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Historically, exceedances of the CO standard in the Medford area 
have occurred during the winter months, when cooler temperatures 
contribute to incomplete combustion, and when CO emissions are trapped 
near the ground by atmospheric inversions. Sources of carbon monoxide 
include industry, motor vehicles, non-road mobile sources, (e.g., 
construction equipment, recreational vehicles, lawn and garden 
equipment, and area sources (e.g., outdoor burning, woodstoves, 
fireplaces, and wildfires). The three consecutive months--December 
through February define the typical CO season. As such, season day 
emissions in addition to annual emissions are included in the 
inventory. The unit of measure for annual emissions is in tons per year 
(tpy), while the unit of measure for season day emissions is in pounds 
per day (lb/day). The county-wide emissions inventory data is spatially 
allocated to the Medford urban growth boundary (UGB), and to buffers 
around the UGB, depending on emissions category.

[[Page 47031]]



        2008 Emissions Inventory, Main Source Category Subtotals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Annual       CO emissions
          Main source category            emissions tons    pounds per
                                             per year       winter day
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stationary Point Sources................         2.367.1          13,159
On-road Mobile Sources..................         5,730.0          28,731
Non-road Mobile Sources.................         4,488.2          10,061
Stationary Area Sources.................         3,333.1          30,399
                                         -------------------------------
    Total...............................        15,927.4          82,350
------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Demonstration of Maintenance

    The CO NAAQS is attained when the annual second highest 8-hour 
average CO concentration for an area does not exceed a concentration of 
9.0 ppm. The last monitored violation of the CO NAAQS in the Medford 
area occurred in 1991, and CO levels have been steadily in decline. The 
second highest 8-hour CO concentration in 2009 was 2.4 ppm, which is in 
attainment with the CO NAAQS.
    For areas that meet the criteria to use the LMP Option, the 
maintenance plan demonstration requirement is considered to be 
satisfied. The EPA believes that if the area begins the maintenance 
period at, or below, 85 percent of the level of the CO 8-hour NAAQS (at 
or below 7.65 ppm), the applicability of prevention of significant 
deterioration requirements, the control measures already in the SIP, 
and Federal control measures already in place will provide adequate 
assurance of maintenance over the maintenance period. Thus, there is no 
requirement to project emissions of air quality over the upcoming 
maintenance period. The second highest 8-hour CO concentration for 
Medford based on the two most recent years of data (2008-2009) is 2.4 
ppm, which is significantly below the LMP Option requirement of 7.65 
ppm.\2\ Therefore, the EPA finds that the ODEQ has demonstrated that 
the Medford area qualifies for the LMP Option and has satisfied the 
maintenance demonstration requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The years 2008-2009 are the most recent two years for 
available monitoring data because monitoring was discontinued after 
2009. The ODEQ has developed an alternate method to verify continued 
attainment of the CO NAAQS, discussed in the next section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Control Measures

    The submittal retains the control measures from the first CO 
maintenance plan (67 FR 48388). The primary control measure has been 
the emission standards for new motor vehicles under the Federal Motor 
Vehicle Control Program. Other control measures have been the Major New 
Source Review Program with Best Available Control Technology (BACT), 
Motor Vehicle Inspection Program, and a woodsmoke curtailment program. 
As stated above, the EPA believes that the Medford area will continue 
to maintain the standard with the continued implementation of these 
control measures along with meeting the other requirements to qualify 
for the LMP option.

D. Monitoring Network and Verification of Continued Attainment

    Monitored CO levels in the Medford area have declined progressively 
since 1991. CO levels have declined significantly across the nation 
through motor vehicle emissions controls and fleet turnover to newer, 
cleaner vehicle models. Once CO levels declined and continued to stay 
well below the NAAQS, the ODEQ requested to remove the Medford CO 
monitor in 2009 and the EPA approved the request on October 14, 2010. 
The ODEQ now has been using an alternate method of verifying continued 
attainment with the CO standard based on the regional emissions 
analysis conducted by the Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning 
Organization and by using the Portland CO monitor to track trends in 
general CO levels. Both the ODEQ report and the EPA network approval 
letter are included in the materials of this docket.
    Under the Medford CO LMP, the ODEQ will verify continued attainment 
of the CO NAAQS by conducting a review of CO emissions inventory data 
for the Medford area. The ODEQ will calculate CO emissions every three 
years as part of the Statewide Emissions Inventory, which is submitted 
to the EPA for inclusion in the National Emissions Inventory (NEI). The 
ODEQ commits to review the NEI estimates to identify any increases over 
the 2008 emission levels (see the base year emissions inventory in this 
section) and report on them in the annual monitoring network plan for 
the applicable year. Because on-road mobile sources and stationary area 
sources are the predominant sources of CO in Medford, these source 
categories will be the primary focus of the ODEQ's review. The ODEQ 
will evaluate any increase in CO emissions to confirm it is not due to 
a change in emission calculation methodology, an exceptional event, or 
other factor not representative of an actual emissions increase.

E. Contingency Plan

    Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires that a maintenance plan include 
contingency provisions necessary to ensure prompt correction of any 
violations of the standard that may occur. The ODEQ has submitted a 
revised contingency plan that has three phase of action. The initial 
contingency plan trigger is a ``significant increase'' in the emissions 
inventory, which is defined as ten percent above the 2008 emissions 
inventory levels. The three phases of actions are as follows:
    Phase 1. If the three-year review of CO emissions shows a 
significant increase in emissions, the ODEQ will reestablish ambient CO 
monitoring in Medford.
    Phase 2. If the monitoring data indicates that the LMP eligibility 
level of 7.65 ppm (85 percent of the 8-hr standard) is exceeded, the 
ODEQ will evaluate the cause of the CO increase, and investigate 
corrective strategies.
    Phase 3. If a validated violation of the CO standard occurs, in 
addition to Phase 2 above, the ODEQ will replace the BACT requirement 
for new and expanding industry with Lowest Achievable Emission Rate 
(LAER); reinstate CO emissions offset requirements for new and 
expanding industry; and consider other CO emission reduction measures.

F. Transportation and General Conformity

    Federal transportation conformity rules (40 CFR parts 51 and 93) 
and general conformity rules (58 FR 63214) continue to apply under a 
LMP. However, as noted in the LMP Option memo, these requirements are 
greatly simplified. An area under a LMP can demonstrate conformity 
without submitting an emissions budget, and as a result, emissions do 
not need to be capped nor does a regional emissions

[[Page 47032]]

analysis (including modeling) need to be conducted.
    On April 28, 2016, the EPA found the Medford CO LMP to be adequate 
for transportation conformity purposes (81 FR 25394). Although regional 
emissions are no longer required as part of the transportation 
conformity determinations for CO for the Medford area, other 
transportation conformity requirements continue to apply to the area, 
such as consultation, transportation control measures, and project 
level conformity requirements. The Medford area will continue to be 
exempt from performing a regional emission analysis, but must meet 
project-level conformity analyses as well as transportation conformity 
areas.

IV. Final Action

    In accordance with the requirements of the CAA, the EPA is 
approving the Medford CO LMP submitted by the ODEQ on December 11, 
2015, and supplemented on December 30, 2015. The ODEQ has adequately 
demonstrated that the Medford area qualifies for the LMP option and 
will maintain the CO NAAQS through the second 10-year maintenance 
period through 2025.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated 
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the 
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial 
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified 
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2016. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review, nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are 
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of 
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules 
section of the Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition 
for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can 
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed 
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 30, 2016.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart MM--Oregon

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.1970, paragraph (e), table titled ``State of Oregon 
Air Quality Control Program'' by revising ``Section 4'' to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.1970  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

[[Page 47033]]



                                   State of Oregon Air Quality Control Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      SIP citation            Title/subject     State effective date    EPA approval date        Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 4...............  Control Strategies    4.1, 12/19/1980.....  4.1, 4/12/1982, 47    4.1 Portland-
                           for Nonattainment                           FR 15587.             Vancouver TSP
                           Areas.                                                            Attainment Plan.
                                                4.2, 7/16/1982......  4.2, 10/7/1982, 47    4.2 Portland-
                                                                       FR 44261.             Vancouver CO
                                                                                             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.3, 7/16/1982......  4.3, 10/7/1982, 47    4.3 Portland-
                                                                       FR 44261.             Vancouver Ozone
                                                                                             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.4, 6/20/1979......  4.4, 6/24/1980, 45    4.4 Salem CO
                                                                       FR 42265.             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.5, 9/19/1980......  4.5, 4/12/1982, 47    4.5 Salem Ozone
                                                                       FR 15587.             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.6, 1/30/1981......  4.6, 4/12/1982, 47    4.6 Eugene-
                                                                       FR 15587.             Springfield TSP
                                                                                             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.7, 6/20/1979......  4.7, 6/24/1980, 45    4.7 Eugene-
                                                                       FR 42265.             Springfield CO
                                                                                             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.7, 12/9/1988......  4.7, 12/6/1993, 58    4.7 Eugene-
                                                                       FR 64161.             Springfield CO
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.8, 1/25/85........  4.8, 6/4/1986, 51 FR  4.8 Medford-Ashland
                                                                       20285.                Ozone, Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.9, 10/15/1982.....  4.9, 2/13/1987, 52    4.9 Medford-Ashland
                                                                       FR 4620.              CO Attainment Plan.
                                                4.10, 4/1983........  4.10, 8/15/1984, 49   4.10 Medford-Ashland
                                                                       FR 32574.             TSP, Attainment
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.11, 10/24/1986....  4.11, 1/15/1988, 53   4.11 Grants Pass CO,
                                                                       FR 1020.              Attainment Plan.
                                                4.12, 8/18/1995.....  4.12, 4/14/1997, 62   4.12 Klamath Falls
                                                                       FR 18047.             PM-10 Attainment
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.13, 11/13/1991....  4.13, 12/17/1993, 58  4.13 Grants Pass PM-
                                                                       FR 65934.             10 Attainment Plan.
                                                4.14, 9/9/2005......  4.14, 6/19/2006, 71   4.14 Medford PM-10
                                                                       FR 35163.             Attainment and
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.15, 11/8/1991.....  4.15, 2/15/1995, 60   4.15 La Grande PM-10
                                                                       FR 8563.              Attainment Plan.
                                                4.16, 1/31/1991.....  4.16, 8/24/1994, 59   4.16 Eugene-
                                                                       FR 43483.             Springfield PM-10
                                                                                             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.17, 11/20/2000,     4.17, 9/20/2001, 66   4.17 Klamath Falls
                                                 (submittal date).     FR 48340.             CO Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.18, 11/4/1996.....  4.18, 3/15/1999, 64   4.18 Oakridge PM-10
                                                                       FR 12751.             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.19, 6/1/1995,       4.19, 9/21/1999, 64   4.19 Lakeview PM-10
                                                 (submittal date).     FR 51051.             Attainment Plan.
                                                4.50, 8/14/1996.....  4.50, 5/19/1997, 62   4.50 Portland/
                                                                       FR 27204.             Vancouver Ozone
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.50, 4/12/2007.....  4.50, 12/19/2011, 76  4.50 Portland-
                                                                       FR 78571.             Vancouver AQMA
                                                                                             (Oregon portion) &
                                                                                             Salem Kaizer Area 8-
                                                                                             hour Ozone
                                                                                             (110(a)(1)
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.51, 7/12/1996.....  4.51, 9/2/1997, 62    4.51 Portland CO
                                                                       FR 46208.             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.52, 3/9/2001......  4.52, 7/24/2002, 67   4.52 Medford CO
                                                                       FR 48388.             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.53, 9/10/1999.....  4.53, 8/31/2000, 65   4.53 Grants Pass CO
                                                                       FR 52932.             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.55, 10/4/2002.....  4.55, 10/27/2003, 68  4.55 Grants Pass PM-
                                                                       FR 61111.             10 Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.56, 10/4/2002.....  4.56, 10/21/2003, 68  4.56 Klamath Falls
                                                                       FR 60036.             PM-10 Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.57, 6/28/2007.....  4.57, 12/30/2008, 73  4.57 Salem-Keizer
                                                                       FR 79655.             Area CO, Limited
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.58, 12/15/2004....  4.58, 1/24/2006, 71   4.58 Portland Area
                                                                       FR 3768.              CO Maintenance Plan
                                                                                             2nd 10-year.
                                                4.58, 12/11/2013....  4.58, 5/22/2014, 79   4.58 Portland Area
                                                                       FR 29360.             CO Maintenance Plan
                                                                                             2nd 10-year; TCM
                                                                                             substitution update
                                                                                             4.58.3.2.2.
                                                4.59, 9/9/2005......  4.59, 6/19/2006, 71   4.59 La Grande PM10
                                                                       FR 35161.             Maintenance Plan.

[[Page 47034]]

 
                                                4.60, 9/9/2005......  4.60, 6/19/2006, 71   4.60 Lakeview PM10
                                                                       FR 35159.             Maintenance Plan.
                                                4.61, 9/26/2011.....  4.61, 4/11/2013, 78   4.61 Eugene-
                                                                       FR 21547.             Springfield PM10
                                                                                             Limited Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.62, 12/12/2012....  4.62, 6/6/2016, 81    4.62, Klamath Falls
                                                                       FR 36178.             PM2.5 Attainment
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.63, 4/16/2015.....  4.63, 7/28/2015, 80   4.63 Grants Pass
                                                                       FR 44867.             Second 10-Year
                                                                                             Carbon Monoxide
                                                                                             Limited Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.64, 4/16/2015.....  4.64, 7/30/2015 80    4.64 Grants Pass
                                                                       FR 45435.             Second 10-Year PM10
                                                                                             Limited Maintenance
                                                                                             Plan.
                                                4.65, 12/11/2015....  4.65 7/20/2016        4.65 Medford Second
                                                                       [Insert Federal       10-Year Carbon
                                                                       Register citation].   Monoxide Limited
                                                                                             Maintenance Plan.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-17060 Filed 7-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                               Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                               47029

                                             D. Federalism and Indian Tribal                          Instruction. An environmental analysis                at the slowest safe speed and comply
                                             Governments                                              checklist supporting this determination               with all lawful directions issued by the
                                                A rule has implications for federalism                and a Categorical Exclusion                           COTP or the designated representative.
                                                                                                      Determination are available in the                       (d) Informational broadcasts. The
                                             under Executive Order 13132,
                                                                                                      docket where indicated under                          COTP or a designated representative
                                             Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
                                                                                                      ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or                    will inform the public through
                                             effect on the States, on the relationship
                                                                                                      information that may lead to the                      broadcast notices to mariners of the
                                             between the national government and
                                                                                                      discovery of a significant environmental              enforcement period for the temporary
                                             the States, or on the distribution of
                                                                                                      impact from this rule.                                safety zone as well as any changes in the
                                             power and responsibilities among the
                                                                                                                                                            planned schedule.
                                             various levels of government. We have                    G. Protest Activities
                                             analyzed this rule under that Order and                                                                          Dated: July 1, 2016.
                                                                                                        The Coast Guard respects the First
                                             have determined that it is consistent                                                                          B.E. Welborn,
                                                                                                      Amendment rights of protesters.
                                             with the fundamental federalism                                                                                Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
                                                                                                      Protesters are asked to contact the
                                             principles and preemption requirements                                                                         Port Morgan City.
                                                                                                      person listed in the FOR FURTHER
                                             described in Executive Order 13132.                                                                            [FR Doc. 2016–17035 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                      INFORMATION CONTACT section to
                                                Also, this rule does not have tribal                                                                        BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
                                                                                                      coordinate protest activities so that your
                                             implications under Executive Order
                                                                                                      message can be received without
                                             13175, Consultation and Coordination
                                                                                                      jeopardizing the safety or security of
                                             with Indian Tribal Governments,                                                                                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                                                                                      people, places or vessels.
                                             because it does not have a substantial                                                                         AGENCY
                                             direct effect on one or more Indian                      List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
                                             tribes, on the relationship between the                    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation                  40 CFR Part 52
                                             Federal Government and Indian tribes,                    (water), Reporting and recordkeeping                  [EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0854; FRL–9949–00–
                                             or on the distribution of power and                      requirements, Security measures,                      Region 10]
                                             responsibilities between the Federal                     Waterways.
                                             Government and Indian tribes. If you                                                                           Air Plan Approval; Oregon; Medford
                                                                                                        For the reasons discussed in the
                                             believe this rule has implications for                                                                         Area Carbon Monoxide Second 10-
                                                                                                      preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
                                             federalism or Indian tribes, please                                                                            Year Maintenance Plan
                                                                                                      CFR part 165 as follows:
                                             contact the person listed in the FOR
                                             FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section                                                                            AGENCY: Environmental Protection
                                                                                                      PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
                                             above.                                                                                                         Agency (EPA).
                                                                                                      AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
                                                                                                                                                            ACTION: Direct final rule.
                                             E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
                                                                                                      ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
                                               The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                                                                             SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection
                                                                                                      continues to read as follows:
                                             of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires                                                                          Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
                                                                                                        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;           action to approve a second 10-year
                                             Federal agencies to assess the effects of                33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
                                             their discretionary regulatory actions. In                                                                     carbon monoxide (CO) limited
                                                                                                      Department of Homeland Security Delegation
                                             particular, the Act addresses actions                                                                          maintenance plan (LMP) for the
                                                                                                      No. 0170.1.
                                             that may result in the expenditure by a                                                                        Medford area in Oregon, submitted by
                                                                                                      ■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0650 to read as                    the Oregon Department of
                                             State, local, or tribal government, in the
                                                                                                      follows:                                              Environmental Quality (tODEQ) on
                                             aggregate, or by the private sector of
                                             $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or                 § 165.T08–0650 Safety zone; Houma
                                                                                                                                                            December 11, 2015, along with a
                                             more in any one year. Though this rule                   Navigation Canal between mile 23 to 23.5,             supplementary submittal on December
                                             will not result in such an expenditure,                  Dulac, LA.                                            30, 2015, as a revision to its State
                                             we do discuss the effects of this rule                     (a) Location. The following area is a               Implementation Plan (SIP). In
                                             elsewhere in this preamble.                              temporary safety zone: All waters of the              accordance with the requirements of the
                                                                                                      Houma Navigation Canal, surface to                    Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA is
                                             F. Environment                                                                                                 approving this SIP revision because it
                                                                                                      bottom, between mile 23 and mile 23.5,
                                               We have analyzed this rule under                       Dulac, LA.                                            demonstrates that the Medford area will
                                             Department of Homeland Security                            (b) Enforcement period. This safety                 continue to meet the CO National
                                             Management Directive 023–01 and                          zone will be enforced from 7:00 a.m.                  Ambient Air Quality Standards
                                             Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,                        until 7:00 p.m. daily from July 7 through             (NAAQS) for a second 10-year period
                                             which guide the Coast Guard in                           July 27, 2016.                                        beyond redesignation, through 2025.
                                             complying with the National                                (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with             DATES: This rule is effective on
                                             Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42                     the general regulations in § 165.23, entry            September 19, 2016, without further
                                             U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have                             into this zone is prohibited unless                   notice, unless the EPA receives adverse
                                             determined that this action is one of a                  specifically authorized by the Captain of             comment by August 19, 2016. If the EPA
                                             category of actions that do not                          the Port Morgan City (COTP) or                        receives adverse comment, we will
                                             individually or cumulatively have a                      designated personnel. Persons or vessels              publish a timely withdrawal in the
                                             significant effect on the human                          desiring to enter into or pass through                Federal Register informing the public
                                             environment. This rule involves a safety                 the zone must request permission from                 that the rule will not take effect.
                                             zone, during daylight hours, lasting less                                                                      ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                                                      the COTP or a designated
                                             than 13 hours per day for 21 days that                   representative. They may be contacted                 identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
                                             will prohibit entry into or transit within               on VHF–FM radio channel 13 and 16 or                  OAR–2015–0854 at http://
                                             MM 23 to 23.5 of the Houma Navigation                    phone at 504–343–7928.                                www.regulations.gov, or via email to
                                             Canal. It is categorically excluded from                   (2) Persons and vessels permitted to                Chi.John@epa.gov. For comments
                                             further review under paragraph 34(g) of                  deviate from this safety zone regulation              submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
                                             Figure 2–1 of the Commandant                             and enter the restricted area must transit            online instructions for submitting


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:53 Jul 19, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00029   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM   20JYR1


                                             47030             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                             comments. Once submitted, comments                       keep the Medford area in attainment                   redesignation to attainment status in
                                             cannot be edited or removed from                         with the CO standard for a second 10-                 conjunction with meeting all
                                             Regulations.gov. For either manner of                    year period beyond redesignation,                     requirements of the October 6, 1995,
                                             submission, the EPA may publish any                      through 2025.                                         memorandum, allows the ODEQ to be
                                             comment received to its public docket.                                                                         eligible to submit a LMP as the update
                                                                                                      II. Background
                                             Do not submit electronically any                                                                               to its original maintenance plan per
                                             information you consider to be                              Under section 107(d)(1)(c) of the                  section 175A(b) of the CAA.
                                             Confidential Business Information (CBI)                  CAA, each CO area designated
                                             or other information whose disclosure is                 nonattainment prior to enactment of the               III. Evaluation of Oregon’s Submittal
                                             restricted by statute. Multimedia                        1990 Amendments, such as Medford,
                                                                                                      was designated nonattainment by                         The requirements of the LMP Option
                                             submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
                                                                                                      operation of law upon enactment of the                and the EPA’s evaluation of how each
                                             accompanied by a written comment.
                                                                                                      1990 Amendments. Under section                        requirement has been met by the
                                             The written comment is considered the
                                                                                                      186(a) of the CAA, each CO area                       ODEQ’s submittal is summarized below.
                                             official comment and should include
                                             discussion of all points you wish to                     designated nonattainment under section                A. Base Year Emission Inventory
                                             make. The EPA will generally not                         107(d) was also classified by operation
                                             consider comments or comment                             of law as either ‘‘moderate’’ or ‘‘serious’’             The LMP must contain an attainment
                                             contents located outside of the primary                  depending on the severity of the area’s               year emissions inventory to identify a
                                             submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or                  air quality problem. CO areas with                    level of CO emissions in the area that is
                                             other file sharing system). For                          design values between 9.1 and 16.4                    sufficiently low enough to attain the CO
                                             additional submission methods, please                    parts per million (ppm), such as                      NAAQS. The submittal contains a
                                             contact the person identified in the FOR                 Medford, were classified as moderate.                 summary of the CO emissions inventory
                                             FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.                     These nonattainment designations and                  for the Medford area for the base year
                                             For the full EPA public comment policy,                  classifications were codified in 40 CFR               2008. The emission inventory lists CO
                                             information about CBI or multimedia                      part 81 on November 6, 1991 (56 FR                    emissions by general source category—
                                             submissions, and general guidance on                     56695).                                               stationary point sources, stationary area
                                             making effective comments, please visit                     On July 24, 2002, the EPA approved                 sources, on-road mobile sources and
                                             http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/                             the ODEQ’s request to redesignate the                 non-road mobile sources. On-road
                                             commenting-epa-dockets.                                  Medford area to attainment of the CO                  mobile sources emissions for the 2008
                                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John                    standard (67 FR 48388). In that action,               base year inventory were estimated with
                                             Chi, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and                the EPA also approved the maintenance                 the EPA’s Motor Vehicle Emissions
                                             Waste (OAW–150), Environmental                           plan required under CAA section                       Simulator (MOVES) 2010b.1 The
                                             Protection Agency, 1200 6th Avenue,                      175A(a) to provide for 10 years of                    methods used to determine the Medford
                                             Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number:                     maintenance of the CO standard in the                 area CO emission inventory are
                                             206–553–1185; email address:                             Medford area through the year 2015 (67                consistent with the EPA’s most recent
                                             Chi.John@epa.gov.                                        FR 48388).
                                                                                                                                                            guidance on developing emission
                                                                                                         As required by the CAA section
                                             SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                                                                     inventories.
                                                                                                      175A(b), the SIP submittal provides a
                                             Throughout this document whenever                        second 10-year plan for maintaining the                  Historically, exceedances of the CO
                                             ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is                CO standard in the Medford area until                 standard in the Medford area have
                                             intended to refer to the EPA.                            2025. For the second 10-year                          occurred during the winter months,
                                             Table of Contents                                        maintenance plan, the ODEQ chose the                  when cooler temperatures contribute to
                                                                                                      option as described in an EPA October                 incomplete combustion, and when CO
                                             I. This Action
                                             II. Background                                           6, 1995 memorandum from Joseph                        emissions are trapped near the ground
                                             III. Evaluation of Oregon’s Submittal                    Paisie, the Group Leader of the                       by atmospheric inversions. Sources of
                                                A. Base Year Emission Inventory                       Integrated Policy and Strategies Group,               carbon monoxide include industry,
                                                B. Demonstration of Maintenance                       titled, ‘‘Limited Maintenance Plan                    motor vehicles, non-road mobile
                                                C. Control Measures                                   Option for Nonclassifiable CO                         sources, (e.g., construction equipment,
                                                D. Monitoring Network and Verification of             Nonattainment Areas’’ (LMP Option).                   recreational vehicles, lawn and garden
                                                   Continued Attainment                               To qualify for the LMP Option, the CO                 equipment, and area sources (e.g.,
                                                E. Contingency Plan
                                                F. Transportation and General Conformity              design value for an area, based on the                outdoor burning, woodstoves,
                                             IV. Final Action                                         eight consecutive quarters (two years of              fireplaces, and wildfires). The three
                                             V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews                 data) used to demonstrate attainment,                 consecutive months—December through
                                                                                                      must be at or below 7.65 ppm (85                      February define the typical CO season.
                                             I. This Action                                           percent of the CO NAAQS). In addition,                As such, season day emissions in
                                                The EPA is approving the carbon                       the control measures from the first CO                addition to annual emissions are
                                             monoxide limited maintenance plan                        maintenance plan must remain in place.                included in the inventory. The unit of
                                             (CO LMP) submitted by the ODEQ, on                          The EPA has determined that the LMP                measure for annual emissions is in tons
                                             December 11, 2015, along with a                          Option for CO is also available to all                per year (tpy), while the unit of measure
                                             supplementary submittal on December                      states as part of the CAA 175A(b) update              for season day emissions is in pounds
                                             30, 2015, (the submittal) for the Medford                to the maintenance plans, regardless of               per day (lb/day). The county-wide
                                             area. A LMP is a means of meeting                        the original nonattainment                            emissions inventory data is spatially
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                             Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for                     classification, or lack thereof. Thus, the            allocated to the Medford urban growth
                                             formerly designated nonattainment                        EPA finds that although the Medford                   boundary (UGB), and to buffers around
                                             areas that meet certain qualification                    area was designated as a moderate                     the UGB, depending on emissions
                                             criteria. This CO LMP is designed to                     nonattainment area for the CO NAAQS,                  category.

                                               1 MOVES2010b was the most current model                analysis. The EPA released MOVES2014 on October
                                             available at the time that ODEQ was performing its       7, 2014 (79 FR 60343).



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:53 Jul 19, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00030   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM   20JYR1


                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                                                                        47031

                                                                                              2008 EMISSIONS INVENTORY, MAIN SOURCE CATEGORY SUBTOTALS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Annual       CO emissions
                                                                                                                  Main source category                                                                                          emissions      pounds per
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              tons per year    winter day

                                             Stationary Point Sources .........................................................................................................................................                     2.367.1         13,159
                                             On-road Mobile Sources ..........................................................................................................................................                      5,730.0         28,731
                                             Non-road Mobile Sources ........................................................................................................................................                       4,488.2         10,061
                                             Stationary Area Sources ..........................................................................................................................................                     3,333.1         30,399

                                                   Total ..................................................................................................................................................................        15,927.4         82,350



                                             B. Demonstration of Maintenance                                             Program with Best Available Control                                           primary focus of the ODEQ’s review.
                                               The CO NAAQS is attained when the                                         Technology (BACT), Motor Vehicle                                              The ODEQ will evaluate any increase in
                                             annual second highest 8-hour average                                        Inspection Program, and a woodsmoke                                           CO emissions to confirm it is not due to
                                             CO concentration for an area does not                                       curtailment program. As stated above,                                         a change in emission calculation
                                             exceed a concentration of 9.0 ppm. The                                      the EPA believes that the Medford area                                        methodology, an exceptional event, or
                                             last monitored violation of the CO                                          will continue to maintain the standard                                        other factor not representative of an
                                             NAAQS in the Medford area occurred in                                       with the continued implementation of                                          actual emissions increase.
                                             1991, and CO levels have been steadily                                      these control measures along with                                             E. Contingency Plan
                                             in decline. The second highest 8-hour                                       meeting the other requirements to
                                                                                                                         qualify for the LMP option.                                                     Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires
                                             CO concentration in 2009 was 2.4 ppm,                                                                                                                     that a maintenance plan include
                                             which is in attainment with the CO                                          D. Monitoring Network and Verification                                        contingency provisions necessary to
                                             NAAQS.                                                                      of Continued Attainment                                                       ensure prompt correction of any
                                               For areas that meet the criteria to use                                                                                                                 violations of the standard that may
                                             the LMP Option, the maintenance plan                                           Monitored CO levels in the Medford
                                                                                                                         area have declined progressively since                                        occur. The ODEQ has submitted a
                                             demonstration requirement is                                                                                                                              revised contingency plan that has three
                                             considered to be satisfied. The EPA                                         1991. CO levels have declined
                                                                                                                         significantly across the nation through                                       phase of action. The initial contingency
                                             believes that if the area begins the                                                                                                                      plan trigger is a ‘‘significant increase’’ in
                                             maintenance period at, or below, 85                                         motor vehicle emissions controls and
                                                                                                                         fleet turnover to newer, cleaner vehicle                                      the emissions inventory, which is
                                             percent of the level of the CO 8-hour                                                                                                                     defined as ten percent above the 2008
                                             NAAQS (at or below 7.65 ppm), the                                           models. Once CO levels declined and
                                                                                                                         continued to stay well below the                                              emissions inventory levels. The three
                                             applicability of prevention of significant                                                                                                                phases of actions are as follows:
                                             deterioration requirements, the control                                     NAAQS, the ODEQ requested to remove
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Phase 1. If the three-year review of CO
                                             measures already in the SIP, and                                            the Medford CO monitor in 2009 and
                                                                                                                                                                                                       emissions shows a significant increase
                                             Federal control measures already in                                         the EPA approved the request on
                                                                                                                                                                                                       in emissions, the ODEQ will reestablish
                                             place will provide adequate assurance                                       October 14, 2010. The ODEQ now has
                                                                                                                                                                                                       ambient CO monitoring in Medford.
                                             of maintenance over the maintenance                                         been using an alternate method of                                               Phase 2. If the monitoring data
                                             period. Thus, there is no requirement to                                    verifying continued attainment with the                                       indicates that the LMP eligibility level
                                             project emissions of air quality over the                                   CO standard based on the regional                                             of 7.65 ppm (85 percent of the 8-hr
                                             upcoming maintenance period. The                                            emissions analysis conducted by the                                           standard) is exceeded, the ODEQ will
                                             second highest 8-hour CO concentration                                      Rogue Valley Metropolitan Planning                                            evaluate the cause of the CO increase,
                                             for Medford based on the two most                                           Organization and by using the Portland                                        and investigate corrective strategies.
                                             recent years of data (2008–2009) is 2.4                                     CO monitor to track trends in general                                           Phase 3. If a validated violation of the
                                             ppm, which is significantly below the                                       CO levels. Both the ODEQ report and                                           CO standard occurs, in addition to
                                             LMP Option requirement of 7.65 ppm.2                                        the EPA network approval letter are                                           Phase 2 above, the ODEQ will replace
                                             Therefore, the EPA finds that the ODEQ                                      included in the materials of this docket.                                     the BACT requirement for new and
                                             has demonstrated that the Medford area                                         Under the Medford CO LMP, the                                              expanding industry with Lowest
                                             qualifies for the LMP Option and has                                        ODEQ will verify continued attainment                                         Achievable Emission Rate (LAER);
                                             satisfied the maintenance demonstration                                     of the CO NAAQS by conducting a                                               reinstate CO emissions offset
                                             requirement.                                                                review of CO emissions inventory data                                         requirements for new and expanding
                                                                                                                         for the Medford area. The ODEQ will                                           industry; and consider other CO
                                             C. Control Measures                                                         calculate CO emissions every three                                            emission reduction measures.
                                               The submittal retains the control                                         years as part of the Statewide Emissions
                                             measures from the first CO maintenance                                      Inventory, which is submitted to the                                          F. Transportation and General
                                             plan (67 FR 48388). The primary control                                     EPA for inclusion in the National                                             Conformity
                                             measure has been the emission                                               Emissions Inventory (NEI). The ODEQ                                              Federal transportation conformity
                                             standards for new motor vehicles under                                      commits to review the NEI estimates to                                        rules (40 CFR parts 51 and 93) and
                                             the Federal Motor Vehicle Control                                           identify any increases over the 2008                                          general conformity rules (58 FR 63214)
                                             Program. Other control measures have                                        emission levels (see the base year                                            continue to apply under a LMP.
                                                                                                                         emissions inventory in this section) and                                      However, as noted in the LMP Option
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                             been the Major New Source Review
                                                                                                                         report on them in the annual monitoring                                       memo, these requirements are greatly
                                               2 The years 2008–2009 are the most recent two                             network plan for the applicable year.                                         simplified. An area under a LMP can
                                             years for available monitoring data because                                 Because on-road mobile sources and                                            demonstrate conformity without
                                             monitoring was discontinued after 2009. The ODEQ
                                             has developed an alternate method to verify
                                                                                                                         stationary area sources are the                                               submitting an emissions budget, and as
                                             continued attainment of the CO NAAQS, discussed                             predominant sources of CO in Medford,                                         a result, emissions do not need to be
                                             in the next section.                                                        these source categories will be the                                           capped nor does a regional emissions


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014         14:53 Jul 19, 2016        Jkt 238001       PO 00000        Frm 00031        Fmt 4700        Sfmt 4700       E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM              20JYR1


                                             47032             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                             analysis (including modeling) need to                    under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5               ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
                                             be conducted.                                            U.S.C. 601 et seq.);                                  804(2).
                                                On April 28, 2016, the EPA found the                     • does not contain any unfunded                       Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
                                             Medford CO LMP to be adequate for                        mandate or significantly or uniquely                  petitions for judicial review of this
                                             transportation conformity purposes (81                   affect small governments, as described                action must be filed in the United States
                                             FR 25394). Although regional emissions                   in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                   Court of Appeals for the appropriate
                                             are no longer required as part of the                    of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);                              circuit by September 19, 2016. Filing a
                                             transportation conformity                                   • does not have Federalism                         petition for reconsideration by the
                                             determinations for CO for the Medford                    implications as specified in Executive                Administrator of this final rule does not
                                             area, other transportation conformity                    Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,                  affect the finality of this action for the
                                             requirements continue to apply to the                    1999);                                                purposes of judicial review, nor does it
                                             area, such as consultation,                                 • is not an economically significant
                                                                                                                                                            extend the time within which a petition
                                             transportation control measures, and                     regulatory action based on health or
                                                                                                                                                            for judicial review may be filed, and
                                             project level conformity requirements.                   safety risks subject to Executive Order
                                                                                                                                                            shall not postpone the effectiveness of
                                             The Medford area will continue to be                     13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
                                                                                                         • is not a significant regulatory action           such rule or action. Parties with
                                             exempt from performing a regional                                                                              objections to this direct final rule are
                                             emission analysis, but must meet                         subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
                                                                                                      28355, May 22, 2001);                                 encouraged to file a comment in
                                             project-level conformity analyses as                                                                           response to the parallel notice of
                                             well as transportation conformity areas.                    • is not subject to requirements of
                                                                                                      Section 12(d) of the National                         proposed rulemaking for this action
                                             IV. Final Action                                         Technology Transfer and Advancement                   published in the proposed rules section
                                                                                                      Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because              of the Federal Register, rather than file
                                               In accordance with the requirements
                                                                                                      this action does not involve technical                an immediate petition for judicial
                                             of the CAA, the EPA is approving the
                                                                                                      standards; and                                        review of this direct final rule, so that
                                             Medford CO LMP submitted by the
                                             ODEQ on December 11, 2015, and                              • does not provide the EPA with the                the EPA can withdraw this direct final
                                                                                                      discretionary authority to address, as                rule and address the comment in the
                                             supplemented on December 30, 2015.
                                                                                                      appropriate, disproportionate human                   proposed rulemaking. This action may
                                             The ODEQ has adequately demonstrated
                                                                                                      health or environmental effects, using                not be challenged later in proceedings to
                                             that the Medford area qualifies for the
                                                                                                      practicable and legally permissible                   enforce its requirements. (See section
                                             LMP option and will maintain the CO
                                                                                                      methods, under Executive Order 12898                  307(b)(2).)
                                             NAAQS through the second 10-year
                                             maintenance period through 2025.                         (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                      List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                                                                                         The SIP is not approved to apply on
                                             V. Statutory and Executive Order                         any Indian reservation land or in any                   Environmental protection, Air
                                             Reviews                                                  other area where the EPA or an Indian                 pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
                                               Under the CAA, the Administrator is                    tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has               Incorporation by reference,
                                             required to approve a SIP submission                     jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian                Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
                                             that complies with the provisions of the                 country, the rule does not have tribal                and recordkeeping requirements.
                                             CAA and applicable Federal regulations.                  implications and will not impose                       Dated: June 30, 2016.
                                             42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).                      substantial direct costs on tribal                    Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
                                             Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the                  governments or preempt tribal law as
                                                                                                                                                            Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
                                             EPA’s role is to approve State choices,                  specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
                                             provided that they meet the criteria of                  FR 67249, November 9, 2000).                              40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
                                             the CAA. Accordingly, this action                           The Congressional Review Act, 5
                                             merely approves State law as meeting                     U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small             PART 52—APPROVAL AND
                                             Federal requirements and does not                        Business Regulatory Enforcement                       PROMULGATION OF
                                             impose additional requirements beyond                    Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides              IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
                                             those imposed by State law. For that                     that before a rule may take effect, the
                                             reason, this action:                                     agency promulgating the rule must                     ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
                                               • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                    submit a rule report, which includes a                continues to read as follows:
                                             action’’ subject to review by the Office                 copy of the rule, to each House of the                    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
                                             of Management and Budget under                           Congress and to the Comptroller General
                                             Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,                     of the United States. The EPA will                    Subpart MM—Oregon
                                             October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,                  submit a report containing this action
                                             January 21, 2011);                                       and other required information to the                 ■ 2. Amend § 52.1970, paragraph (e),
                                               • does not impose an information                       U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of                        table titled ‘‘State of Oregon Air Quality
                                             collection burden under the provisions                   Representatives, and the Comptroller                  Control Program’’ by revising ‘‘Section
                                             of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44                       General of the United States prior to                 4’’ to read as follows:
                                             U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);                                    publication of the rule in the Federal
                                                                                                                                                            § 52.1970    Identification of plan.
                                               • is certified as not having a                         Register. A major rule cannot take effect
                                             significant economic impact on a                         until 60 days after it is published in the            *       *    *      *     *
                                             substantial number of small entities                     Federal Register. This action is not a                    (e) * * *
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:53 Jul 19, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00032   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM   20JYR1


                                                                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                                     47033

                                                                                            STATE OF OREGON AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM
                                                                                                                      State                                   EPA
                                               SIP citation                 Title/subject                                                                                                      Explanation
                                                                                                                  effective date                          approval date


                                                      *                         *                       *                       *                             *                    *                      *
                                             Section 4 ........    Control Strategies for Non-         4.1, 12/19/1980 ......................      4.1, 4/12/1982, 47 FR 15587         4.1 Portland-Vancouver TSP
                                                                    attainment Areas.                                                                                                    Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.2, 7/16/1982 ........................     4.2, 10/7/1982, 47 FR 44261         4.2 Portland-Vancouver CO
                                                                                                                                                                                         Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.3, 7/16/1982 ........................     4.3, 10/7/1982, 47 FR 44261         4.3 Portland-Vancouver
                                                                                                                                                                                         Ozone Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.4, 6/20/1979 ........................     4.4, 6/24/1980, 45 FR 42265         4.4 Salem CO Attainment
                                                                                                                                                                                         Plan.
                                                                                                       4.5, 9/19/1980 ........................     4.5, 4/12/1982, 47 FR 15587         4.5 Salem Ozone Attainment
                                                                                                                                                                                         Plan.
                                                                                                       4.6, 1/30/1981 ........................     4.6, 4/12/1982, 47 FR 15587         4.6 Eugene-Springfield TSP
                                                                                                                                                                                         Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.7, 6/20/1979 ........................     4.7, 6/24/1980, 45 FR 42265         4.7 Eugene-Springfield CO
                                                                                                                                                                                         Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.7, 12/9/1988 ........................     4.7, 12/6/1993, 58 FR 64161         4.7 Eugene-Springfield CO
                                                                                                                                                                                         Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.8, 1/25/85 ............................   4.8, 6/4/1986, 51 FR 20285 ..       4.8 Medford-Ashland Ozone,
                                                                                                                                                                                         Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.9, 10/15/1982 ......................      4.9, 2/13/1987, 52 FR 4620 ..       4.9 Medford-Ashland CO At-
                                                                                                                                                                                         tainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.10, 4/1983 ...........................    4.10, 8/15/1984, 49 FR 32574        4.10 Medford-Ashland TSP,
                                                                                                                                                                                         Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.11, 10/24/1986 ....................       4.11, 1/15/1988, 53 FR 1020         4.11 Grants Pass CO, Attain-
                                                                                                                                                                                         ment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.12, 8/18/1995 ......................      4.12, 4/14/1997, 62 FR 18047        4.12 Klamath Falls PM–10 At-
                                                                                                                                                                                         tainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.13, 11/13/1991 ....................       4.13, 12/17/1993, 58 FR             4.13 Grants Pass PM–10 At-
                                                                                                                                                     65934.                              tainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.14, 9/9/2005 ........................     4.14, 6/19/2006, 71 FR 35163        4.14 Medford PM–10 Attain-
                                                                                                                                                                                         ment and Maintenance
                                                                                                                                                                                         Plan.
                                                                                                       4.15, 11/8/1991 ......................      4.15, 2/15/1995, 60 FR 8563         4.15 La Grande PM–10 At-
                                                                                                                                                                                         tainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.16, 1/31/1991 ......................      4.16, 8/24/1994, 59 FR 43483        4.16 Eugene-Springfield PM–
                                                                                                                                                                                         10 Attainment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.17, 11/20/2000, (submittal                4.17, 9/20/2001, 66 FR 48340        4.17 Klamath Falls CO Main-
                                                                                                         date).                                                                          tenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.18, 11/4/1996 ......................      4.18, 3/15/1999, 64 FR 12751        4.18 Oakridge PM–10 Attain-
                                                                                                                                                                                         ment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.19, 6/1/1995, (submittal                  4.19, 9/21/1999, 64 FR 51051        4.19 Lakeview PM–10 Attain-
                                                                                                         date).                                                                          ment Plan.
                                                                                                       4.50, 8/14/1996 ......................      4.50, 5/19/1997, 62 FR 27204        4.50 Portland/Vancouver
                                                                                                                                                                                         Ozone Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.50, 4/12/2007 ......................      4.50, 12/19/2011, 76 FR             4.50 Portland-Vancouver
                                                                                                                                                     78571.                              AQMA (Oregon portion) &
                                                                                                                                                                                         Salem Kaizer Area 8-hour
                                                                                                                                                                                         Ozone (110(a)(1) Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                         nance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.51, 7/12/1996 ......................      4.51, 9/2/1997, 62 FR 46208         4.51 Portland CO Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                         nance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.52, 3/9/2001 ........................     4.52, 7/24/2002, 67 FR 48388        4.52 Medford CO Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                         nance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.53, 9/10/1999 ......................      4.53, 8/31/2000, 65 FR 52932        4.53 Grants Pass CO Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                         nance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.55, 10/4/2002 ......................      4.55, 10/27/2003, 68 FR             4.55 Grants Pass PM–10
                                                                                                                                                     61111.                              Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.56, 10/4/2002 ......................      4.56, 10/21/2003, 68 FR             4.56 Klamath Falls PM–10
                                                                                                                                                     60036.                              Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.57, 6/28/2007 ......................      4.57, 12/30/2008, 73 FR             4.57 Salem-Keizer Area CO,
                                                                                                                                                     79655.                              Limited Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                       4.58, 12/15/2004 ....................       4.58, 1/24/2006, 71 FR 3768         4.58 Portland Area CO Main-
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                                                                                                                                         tenance Plan 2nd 10-year.
                                                                                                       4.58, 12/11/2013 ....................       4.58, 5/22/2014, 79 FR 29360        4.58 Portland Area CO Main-
                                                                                                                                                                                         tenance Plan 2nd 10-year;
                                                                                                                                                                                         TCM substitution update
                                                                                                                                                                                         4.58.3.2.2.
                                                                                                       4.59, 9/9/2005 ........................     4.59, 6/19/2006, 71 FR 35161        4.59 La Grande PM10 Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                         nance Plan.



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:53 Jul 19, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00033     Fmt 4700     Sfmt 4700    E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM    20JYR1


                                             47034                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 139 / Wednesday, July 20, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                                                                          STATE OF OREGON AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM—Continued
                                                                                                                               State                                     EPA
                                                 SIP citation                    Title/subject                                                                                                            Explanation
                                                                                                                           effective date                            approval date

                                                                                                              4.60, 9/9/2005 ........................        4.60, 6/19/2006, 71 FR 35159         4.60 Lakeview PM10 Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                                    nance Plan.
                                                                                                              4.61, 9/26/2011 ......................         4.61, 4/11/2013, 78 FR 21547         4.61 Eugene-Springfield PM10
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Limited Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                              4.62, 12/12/2012 ....................          4.62, 6/6/2016, 81 FR 36178          4.62, Klamath Falls PM2.5 At-
                                                                                                                                                                                                    tainment Plan.
                                                                                                              4.63, 4/16/2015 ......................         4.63, 7/28/2015, 80 FR 44867         4.63 Grants Pass Second 10-
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Year Carbon Monoxide
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Limited Maintenance Plan.
                                                                                                              4.64, 4/16/2015 ......................         4.64, 7/30/2015 80 FR 45435          4.64 Grants Pass Second 10-
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Year PM10 Limited Mainte-
                                                                                                                                                                                                    nance Plan.
                                                                                                              4.65, 12/11/2015 ....................          4.65 7/20/2016 [Insert Fed-          4.65 Medford Second 10-
                                                                                                                                                               eral Register citation].             Year Carbon Monoxide
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Limited Maintenance Plan.

                                                         *                            *                           *                          *                         *                      *                      *



                                             *       *       *       *       *                               ADDRESSES:    EPA has established a                            by EPA in 2008. EPA believes that the
                                             [FR Doc. 2016–17060 Filed 7–19–16; 8:45 am]                     docket for this action under Docket ID                         SIP submitted by the state satisfies the
                                             BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                          No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0708. All                                 applicable requirements of the CAA
                                                                                                             documents in the docket are listed on                          identified in EPA’s Final Rule (73 FR
                                                                                                             the http://www.regulations.gov Web                             66964, October 15, 2008), and will bring
                                             ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                        site. Although listed in the index, some                       the area into attainment of the 0.15
                                             AGENCY                                                          information is not publicly available,                         microgram per cubic meter (ug/m3) lead
                                                                                                             i.e., CBI or other information whose                           NAAQS. EPA’s proposal containing the
                                             40 CFR Part 52                                                  disclosure is restricted by statute.                           background information for this action
                                             [EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0708; FRL 9949–13–                            Certain other material, such as                                can be found at 81 FR 10162, February
                                             Region 7]                                                       copyrighted material, is not placed on                         29, 2016.
                                                                                                             the Internet and will be publicly
                                             Approval and Promulgation of Air                                                                                               II. Have the requirements for the
                                                                                                             available only in hard copy form.
                                             Quality Implementation Plans; State of                                                                                         approval of a SIP revision been met?
                                                                                                             Publicly available docket materials are
                                             Kansas; 2015 Kansas State                                       available through www.regulations.gov                            The state submission has met the
                                             Implementation Plan for the 2008 Lead                           or please contact the person identified                        public notice requirements for SIP
                                             Standard                                                        in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION                                 submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
                                             AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                               CONTACT section for additional                                 51.102. The submission also satisfied
                                             Agency.                                                         information.                                                   the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
                                             ACTION: Final rule.                                                                                                            51, appendix V. In addition, the revision
                                                                                                             FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                                                                                            meets the substantive SIP requirements
                                                                                                             Stephanie Doolan, Environmental
                                             SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection                                                                                        of the CAA, including section 110 and
                                                                                                             Protection Agency, Air Planning and
                                             Agency (EPA) is taking final action to                                                                                         implementing regulations.
                                                                                                             Development Branch, 11201 Renner
                                             approve a revision to the State
                                                                                                             Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at                             III. EPA’s Response to Comments
                                             Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
                                                                                                             (913) 551–7719, or by email at                                   The public comment period on EPA’s
                                             of Kansas. This final action will approve
                                                                                                             doolan.stephanie@epa.gov.                                      proposed rule opened February 29,
                                             Kansas’ SIP for the lead National
                                             Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                     2016, the date of its publication in the
                                             nonattainment area of Salina, Saline                            Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’                       Federal Register, and closed on March
                                             County, Kansas, received by EPA on                              or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.                                       30, 2016. During this period, EPA
                                             February 25, 2015. EPA proposed                                 Table of Contents                                              received one comment letter from Exide
                                             approval of this plan on February 29,                                                                                          Technologies, dated March 23, 2016.
                                             2016. The applicable standard                                   I. What is being addressed in this document?                   The comment letter contained one
                                                                                                             II. Have the requirements for the approval of                  comment regarding EPA’s process
                                             addressed in this action is the lead                                  a SIP revision been met?
                                             NAAQS promulgated by EPA in 2008.                               III. EPA’s Response to Comments
                                                                                                                                                                            description in section V.A.1 of the
                                             EPA believes that the SIP submitted by                          IV. What action is EPA taking?                                 proposal which states:
                                             the state satisfies the applicable                                                                                               ‘‘The Exide facility in Salina, Kansas,
                                             requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)                         I. What is being addressed in this                             manufactures lead acid batteries for
                                             identified in EPA’s Final Rule published                        document?                                                      automobiles, trucks, and watercraft. Lead
                                             in the Federal Register on October 15,                             In this document, EPA is granting                           emissions result from breaking open used
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                             2008, and will bring the designated                             final approval of Kansas’ attainment                           batteries, re-melting the lead and
                                             portions of Salina, Kansas, into                                                                                               reformulating new batteries.’’
                                                                                                             demonstration SIP for the lead NAAQS
                                             attainment of the 0.15 microgram per                            nonattainment area in portions of                                Exide commented that EPA is in error
                                             cubic meter (ug/m3) lead NAAQS.                                 Salina, Saline County, Kansas. The                             regarding the description of the facility’s
                                             DATES: This final rule is effective on                          applicable standard addressed in this                          processes; the Exide Salina, Kansas,
                                             August 19, 2016.                                                action is the lead NAAQS promulgated                           facility does not break open used


                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014      14:53 Jul 19, 2016       Jkt 238001   PO 00000       Frm 00034   Fmt 4700       Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\20JYR1.SGM     20JYR1



Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:56:59
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:56:59
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionDirect final rule.
DatesThis rule is effective on September 19, 2016, without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comment by August 19, 2016. If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect.
ContactJohn Chi, Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and Waste (OAW-150), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101; telephone number: 206-553-1185; email
FR Citation81 FR 47029 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR