81 FR 47291 - Safety Zone; Tennessee River 385.0-387.0; Scottsboro, AL
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)
| Page Range | 47291-47293 | |
| FR Document | 2016-17333 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 47291-47293] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-17333] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0467] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Tennessee River 385.0-387.0; Scottsboro, AL AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Temporary final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for all waters of the Tennessee River beginning at mile marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker 387.0. This safety zone is necessary to protect persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with the demolition of the B.B. Comer Bridge. This rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 21, 2016 until August 1, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from May 31, 2016 until July 21, 2016. [[Page 47292]] ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG- 2016-0467 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Ashley Schad, MSD Nashville, Nashville, TN, at 615-736-5421 or at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On May 27, 2016, the Contract Drilling and Blasting representative submitted a CG-4260 to the Coast Guard for blasting operations that would take place from May 31, 2016 to August 1, 2016 during the demolition of the B.B. Comer Bridge on the Tennessee River at mile marker 386.0. The blasting operations will take place at various times and dates determined by environmental factors. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined that this safety zone is necessary to protect persons, property, and infrastructure before, during, and after blasting operations. The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard was informed of this project in early May, but full details of blasting operations on or over a Navigable Waterway were not provided until May 27, 2016 with a start date of May 31, 2016. The notification of blasting requirements were made only a few days before the project is scheduled to begin. Immediate action is needed to respond to potential safety hazards related to blasting operations on or over this navigable waterway. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish this safety zone by May 31, 2016. We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action is needed to establish a safety zone to protect persons, property, and infrastructure whenever blasting operations take place on the B.B. Comer Bridge from May 31, 2016 until August 1, 2016. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) has determined the need to protect persons, property, and infrastructure during the blasting operations taking place on the B.B. Comer Bridge on the Tennessee River at mile marker 386.0. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and these navigable waters before, during, and after blasting operations take place. IV. Discussion of the Rule The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley is establishing this safety zone from May 31, 2016 through August 1, 2016, for all waters of the Tennessee River beginning at mile marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker 387.0. The periods of enforcement will be 30 minutes prior to, during, and 30 minutes after any blasting operation that takes place on the B.B. Comer Bridge. The Coast Guard was informed that there would be between 9 and 12 blasting operations that will take place during daylight hours and will last approximately one hour on each occurrence. Safety zone enforcement times will be announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to Mariners (LNM), or through other public notice and at least 12-24 hour notice will be provided before each enforcement period. Any deviation from this rule are prohibited unless specifically authorized by the COTP Ohio Valley, or a designated representative. Deviations requests will be considered and reviewed on a case-by-case basis. The COTP Ohio Valley may be contacted by telephone at 1-800-253-7465 or can be reached by VHF-FM channel 16. The duration of each safety zone enforcement period is intended to protect persons, property, and infrastructure from safety hazards associated with blasting operations. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory text we are establishing appears at the end of this document. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive order related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This regulatory action determination is based on the size, location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. This safety zone prohibits transit on the Tennessee River from mile 385.0 to mile 387.0, 30 minutes prior to, during, and 30 minutes after blasting operations on the B.B. Comer bridge from May 31, 2016 through August 1, 2016. Broadcast Notices to Mariners and Local Notices to Mariners will also inform the community of the safety zone enforcement periods through BNM, LNM and other forms of public notice so that they may plan accordingly for each short enforcement period restricting transit. Vessel traffic may request permission from the COTP Ohio Valley or a designated representative to enter the restricted area. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. [[Page 47293]] While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves area safety zone that would prohibit entry to unauthorized vessels. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231. 0 2. A new temporary Sec. 165.35T08-0467 is added to read as follows: Sec. 165.35T08-0467 Safety Zone; Tennessee River Mile 385.0 to 387.0 Scottsboro, AL. (a) Location. All waters of the Tennessee River beginning at mile marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker 387.0 Scottsboro, AL. (b) Effective date. This rule is effective from May 31, 2016 through August 1, 2016. (c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule will be enforced from 30 minutes prior to and 30 minutes after all blasting operations on the B.B. Comer Bridge. The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to Mariners (LNM), or through other public notice and at least 12-24 in advance of each enforcement period. (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative. (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the area must request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16, or at 1-800-253-7465. Dated: May 31, 2016. R. V. Timme, Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley. [FR Doc. 2016-17333 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47291
another reference on the label in a PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL becomes the southern boundary of
misleading manner, the bottler would AREAS Cheboygan County, and continuing
have to obtain approval of a new label. along the Cheboygan county line to the
Different rules apply if a wine has a ■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 intersection of the Cheboygan county
brand name containing an AVA name continues to read as follows: line with the eastern boundary of
that was used as a brand name on a Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. Charlevoix County; then
label approved before July 7, 1986. See (6) Proceed south then east along the
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details. Subpart C—Approved American Charlevoix county line to the
Viticultural Areas intersection of the Charlevoix county
With the establishment of this AVA, line with the eastern boundary of
its name, ‘‘Tip of the Mitt,’’ will be ■ 2. Subpart C is amended by adding Antrim County; then
recognized as a name of viticultural § 9.257 to read as follows: (7) Proceed south along the Antrim
significance under § 4.39(i)(3) of the county line to the point where the
TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The § 9.257 Tip of the Mitt.
county line turns due east; then
text of the regulation clarifies this point. (a) Name. The name of the viticultural (8) Proceed west in a straight line to
Consequently, wine bottlers using the area described in this section is ‘‘Tip of the eastern shoreline of Grand Traverse
name ‘‘Tip of the Mitt’’ in a brand name, the Mitt’’. For purposes of part 4 of this Bay; then
including a trademark, or in another chapter, ‘‘Tip of the Mitt’’ is a term of (9) Proceed north-northeasterly along
label reference as to the origin of the viticultural significance. the shorelines of Grand Traverse Bay,
wine, will have to ensure that the (b) Approved maps. The 2 United Lake Michigan, Little Traverse Bay,
product is eligible to use the AVA name States Geological Survey (USGS) Sturgeon Bay, Trails End Bay, and the
as an appellation of origin. 1:250,000 scale topographic maps used Straits of Mackinac, returning to the
to determine the boundary of the Tip of beginning point.
The establishment of the Tip of the the Mitt viticultural area are titled:
Mitt AVA will not affect any existing Signed: June 29, 2016.
(1) Cheboygan, Michigan, 1955;
AVA. The establishment of the Tip of John J. Manfreda,
revised 1981; and
the Mitt AVA will allow vintners to use (2) Alpena, Mich., US–Ontario, Can.; Administrator.
‘‘Tip of the Mitt’’ as an appellation of 1954. Approved: July 10, 2016.
origin for wines made primarily from (c) Boundary. The Tip of the Mitt Timothy E. Skud,
grapes grown within the Tip of the Mitt viticultural area is located in all or Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
AVA if the wines meet the eligibility portions of Charlevoix, Emmet, Tariff Policy).
requirements for the appellation. Cheboygan, Presque Isle, Alpena, and [FR Doc. 2016–17274 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
Antrim Counties in Michigan. The BILLING CODE 4310–31–P
Regulatory Flexibility Act
boundary of the Tip of the Mitt
TTB certifies that this regulation will viticultural area is as described below:
not have a significant economic impact (1) The beginning point is on the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
on a substantial number of small Cheboygan map, at the point where the SECURITY
entities. The regulation imposes no new Mackinac Bridge intersects the southern
shoreline of the Straits of Mackinac. Coast Guard
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit From the beginning point, proceed east-
southeasterly along the shoreline of the 33 CFR Part 165
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s South Channel of the Straits of [Docket Number USCG–2016–0467]
efforts and consumer acceptance of Mackinac and Lake Huron, crossing
onto the Alpena map and continuing to RIN 1625–AA00
wines from that area. Therefore, no
follow the Lake Huron shoreline and
regulatory flexibility analysis is Safety Zone; Tennessee River 385.0–
then the Thunder Bay shoreline to the
required. 387.0; Scottsboro, AL
point where the Thunder Bay shoreline
Executive Order 12866 intersects the common T31N/T30N AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
township line south of the city of ACTION: Temporary final rule.
It has been determined that this final Alpena and north of Bare Point; then
rule is not a significant regulatory action (2) Proceed northwesterly in a straight SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of line to the intersection of an unnamed establishing a safety zone for all waters
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no medium-duty road known locally as of the Tennessee River beginning at mile
regulatory assessment is required. Long Rapids Road and an unnamed marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker
light-duty road known locally as Cathro 387.0. This safety zone is necessary to
Drafting Information protect persons, property, and
Road; then
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations (3) Proceed west in a straight line to infrastructure from potential damage
and Rulings Division drafted this final the line’s intersection with State and safety hazards associated with the
rule. Highway 65 and an unnamed light-duty demolition of the B.B. Comer Bridge.
road known locally as Hibner Road; This rulemaking would prohibit persons
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 then and vessels from entering the safety
(4) Proceed northwesterly in a straight zone area unless authorized by the
Wine. line to the intersection of the Presque Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
The Regulatory Amendment Isle, Alpena, and Montmorency county designated representative.
lines; then DATES: This rule is effective without
For the reasons discussed in the (5) Proceed west along the southern actual notice from July 21, 2016 until
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter boundary of Presque Isle County, August 1, 2016. For the purposes of
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as crossing onto the Cheboygan map, to the enforcement, actual notice will be used
follows: point where the Presque Isle county line from May 31, 2016 until July 21, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47431/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47293
While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
zone area may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A above this contact the person listed in the FOR ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
rule would not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section continues to read as follows:
economic impact on any vessel owner above. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231.
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 2. A new temporary § 165.35T08–0467
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is added to read as follows:
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
§ 165.35T08–0467 Safety Zone; Tennessee
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of River Mile 385.0 to 387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions (a) Location. All waters of the
would affect your small business,
that may result in the expenditure by a Tennessee River beginning at mile
organization, or governmental
State, local, or tribal government, in the marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker
jurisdiction and you have questions
aggregate, or by the private sector of 387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
concerning its provisions or options for
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (b) Effective date. This rule is effective
compliance, please contact the person
more in any one year. Though this rule from May 31, 2016 through August 1,
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
will not result in such an expenditure, 2016.
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule (c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. will be enforced from 30 minutes prior
who enforce, or otherwise determine to and 30 minutes after all blasting
F. Environment operations on the B.B. Comer Bridge.
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security a designated representative will inform
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and the public through Broadcast Notice to
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in Mariners (LNM), or through other public
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National notice and at least 12–24 in advance of
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 each enforcement period.
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have (d) Regulations.
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a (1) In accordance with the general
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a into this area is prohibited unless
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human authorized by the Captain of the Port
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves area Ohio Valley or a designated
of the Coast Guard. safety zone that would prohibit entry to representative.
unauthorized vessels. It is categorically (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
C. Collection of Information excluded from further review under into or passage through the area must
This rule will not call for a new paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the request permission from the Captain of
collection of information under the Commandant Instruction. An the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 environmental analysis checklist representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector
U.S.C. 3501–3520). supporting this determination and a Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF
Categorical Exclusion Determination are Channel 13 or 16, or at 1–800–253–
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 7465.
available in the docket where indicated
Governments
under ADDRESSES. We seek any Dated: May 31, 2016.
A rule has implications for federalism comments or information that may lead R. V. Timme,
under Executive Order 13132, to the discovery of a significant Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct environmental impact from this rule. Port Ohio Valley.
effect on the States, on the relationship
G. Protest Activities [FR Doc. 2016–17333 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
between the national government and
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
the States, or on the distribution of The Coast Guard respects the First
power and responsibilities among the Amendment rights of protesters.
various levels of government. We have Protesters are asked to contact the
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
analyzed this rule under that Order and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
SECURITY
have determined that it is consistent INFORMATION CONTACT section to
with the fundamental federalism coordinate protest activities so that your Coast Guard
principles and preemption requirements message can be received without
described in Executive Order 13132. jeopardizing the safety or security of 33 CFR Part 165
Also, this rule does not have tribal people, places or vessels.
implications under Executive Order [Docket Number USCG–2016–0648]
13175, Consultation and Coordination List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
with Indian Tribal Governments, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation RIN 1625–AA00
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
because it does not have a substantial (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
direct effect on one or more Indian requirements, Security measures, Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater,
tribes, on the relationship between the Waterways. NJ.
Federal Government and Indian tribes, For the reasons discussed in the AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
or on the distribution of power and preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard amends
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
responsibilities between the Federal 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47431/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:58:54
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:58:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective without actual notice from July 21, 2016 until August 1, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from May 31, 2016 until July 21, 2016. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Ashley Schad, MSD Nashville, Nashville, TN, at 615-736-5421 or at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 47291 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR