81 FR 47293 - Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)

Page Range		47293-47295
FR Document		2016-17332

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the waters of the Hudson River in the vicinity of Edgewater, NJ. This zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Hudson River due to the presence of a dielectric oil leak from a submerged power cable, and the hazards associated with the cable repair vessels. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect people and vessels from the hazards associated with this event. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port New York.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47293-47295]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17332]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0648]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47294]]

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the 
waters of the Hudson River in the vicinity of Edgewater, NJ. This zone 
is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of the Hudson River due 
to the presence of a dielectric oil leak from a submerged power cable, 
and the hazards associated with the cable repair vessels. This 
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect people and vessels from 
the hazards associated with this event. Entry of vessels or persons 
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the 
Captain of the Port New York.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from July 21, 2016 
through July 10, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice 
will be used from July 10, 2016 through July 21, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0648 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email MST1 Kristina Pundt, Waterways Management Division, U.S. 
Coast Guard Sector New York; telephone 718-354-4352, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On January 2, 2016, the Coast Guard received notification of a 
dielectric oil release from a submerged power cable in the Hudson River 
in the vicinity Edgewater, NJ. In response, on February 5, 2016, the 
Coast Guard published a temporary final rule at 33 CFR 165-T01.0028 (81 
FR 246181) establishing a safety zone to be enforced until July 9, 2016 
or until completion of cleanup and cable repairs. On May 29, 2016, the 
Coast Guard received notification that cleanup operations and cable 
repairs were completed. The Coast Guard received notification of 
another dielectric oil release from a submerged power cable in the 
Hudson River in the vicinity of Edgewater, NJ on June 28, 2016.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. 
Waiting for a notice and comment period to run would inhibit the Coast 
Guard from protecting the public and vessels from the possible hazards 
associated with this dielectric oil leak and the hazards associated 
with the cable repairs.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons as 
discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice and 
comment period to run would be impracticable.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port New York (COTP) has determined that a 
temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of vessels from 
the hazards associated with this dielectric oil leak and power cable 
repairs.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from July 10, 2016 through July 
10, 2017. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of the Hudson 
River extending 1700 feet from the New Jersey shoreline and 
approximately 460 feet on either side of the charted power cable 
between Edgewater, NJ and W 110th Street, Manhattan, NY.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative. Vessel operators must contact the COTP or an on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to transit through this safety 
zone. The COTP or an on-scene representative may be contacted by VHF 
Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, and will not adversely alter 
the budget of any grant or loan recipients. Vessel traffic will be able 
to safely transit around this safety zone. This safety zone only 
affects a small-designated area of the Hudson River waterway. Moreover, 
the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM 
marine channel 16 and publish the information in the Local Notice to 
Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for

[[Page 47295]]

compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone that will prohibit 
entry within the dielectric oil spill, cleanup, and power cable repair 
area, and is therefore categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination will be available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:


    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0648 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0648  Safety Zone: Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
U.S. navigable waters of the Hudson River bound by the following 
points: 40[deg]48'40.088'' N., 073[deg]58'53.026'' W.; thence to 
40[deg]48'34.267'' N., 073[deg]58'37.096'' W.; thence to 
40[deg]48'26.404'' N., 073[deg]58'42.270'' W.; thence to 
40[deg]48'33.882'' N., 073[deg]59'01.955'' W., thence along the western 
shoreline to the point of origin. All coordinates are based on the NAD 
83.
    (b) Enforcement period. The safety zone described in paragraph (a) 
of this section will be enforced from July 10, 2016 through July 10, 
2017, unless terminated sooner by the COTP.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
33 CFR 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated on 
scene representative.
    (3) An ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State or local law 
enforcement officer designated by or assisting the COTP to act on his 
behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators must contact the COTP via the Command Center 
to obtain permission to enter or operate within the safety zone. The 
COTP may be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at (718) 354-4353. Vessel 
operators given permission to enter or operate within the safety zone 
must comply with all directions given to them by the COTP, via the 
Command Center or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: July 8, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2016-17332 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47293

While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
zone area may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A above this contact the person listed in the FOR ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
rule would not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section continues to read as follows:
economic impact on any vessel owner above. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231.
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 2. A new temporary § 165.35T08–0467
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is added to read as follows:
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
§ 165.35T08–0467 Safety Zone; Tennessee
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of River Mile 385.0 to 387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions (a) Location. All waters of the
would affect your small business,
that may result in the expenditure by a Tennessee River beginning at mile
organization, or governmental
State, local, or tribal government, in the marker 385.0 and ending at mile marker
jurisdiction and you have questions
aggregate, or by the private sector of 387.0 Scottsboro, AL.
concerning its provisions or options for
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (b) Effective date. This rule is effective
compliance, please contact the person
more in any one year. Though this rule from May 31, 2016 through August 1,
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
will not result in such an expenditure, 2016.
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule (c) Periods of Enforcement. This rule
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. will be enforced from 30 minutes prior
who enforce, or otherwise determine to and 30 minutes after all blasting
F. Environment operations on the B.B. Comer Bridge.
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under The Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security a designated representative will inform
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and the public through Broadcast Notice to
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, Mariners (BNM), Local Notices to
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in Mariners (LNM), or through other public
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National notice and at least 12–24 in advance of
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 each enforcement period.
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have (d) Regulations.
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a (1) In accordance with the general
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a into this area is prohibited unless
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human authorized by the Captain of the Port
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves area Ohio Valley or a designated
of the Coast Guard. safety zone that would prohibit entry to representative.
unauthorized vessels. It is categorically (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
C. Collection of Information excluded from further review under into or passage through the area must
This rule will not call for a new paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the request permission from the Captain of
collection of information under the Commandant Instruction. An the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 environmental analysis checklist representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector
U.S.C. 3501–3520). supporting this determination and a Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF
Categorical Exclusion Determination are Channel 13 or 16, or at 1–800–253–
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 7465.
available in the docket where indicated
Governments
under ADDRESSES. We seek any Dated: May 31, 2016.
A rule has implications for federalism comments or information that may lead R. V. Timme,
under Executive Order 13132, to the discovery of a significant Captain, U. S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct environmental impact from this rule. Port Ohio Valley.
effect on the States, on the relationship
G. Protest Activities [FR Doc. 2016–17333 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
between the national government and
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
the States, or on the distribution of The Coast Guard respects the First
power and responsibilities among the Amendment rights of protesters.
various levels of government. We have Protesters are asked to contact the
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
analyzed this rule under that Order and person listed in the FOR FURTHER
SECURITY
have determined that it is consistent INFORMATION CONTACT section to
with the fundamental federalism coordinate protest activities so that your Coast Guard
principles and preemption requirements message can be received without
described in Executive Order 13132. jeopardizing the safety or security of 33 CFR Part 165
Also, this rule does not have tribal people, places or vessels.
implications under Executive Order [Docket Number USCG–2016–0648]
13175, Consultation and Coordination List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
with Indian Tribal Governments, Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation RIN 1625–AA00
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

because it does not have a substantial (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
direct effect on one or more Indian requirements, Security measures, Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater,
tribes, on the relationship between the Waterways. NJ.
Federal Government and Indian tribes, For the reasons discussed in the AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
or on the distribution of power and preamble, the U.S. Coast Guard amends
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
responsibilities between the Federal 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47295

compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or § 165.T01–0648 Safety Zone: Hudson
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule River, Edgewater, NJ.
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure, (a) Location. The following area is a
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule temporary safety zone: All U.S.
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
who enforce, or otherwise determine navigable waters of the Hudson River
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment bound by the following points:
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under 40°48′40.088″ N., 073°58′53.026″ W.;
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security thence to 40°48′34.267″ N.,
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and 073°58′37.096″ W.; thence to
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 40°48′26.404″ N., 073°58′42.270″ W.;
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in thence to 40°48′33.882″ N.,
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National 073°59′01.955″ W., thence along the
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 western shoreline to the point of origin.
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have All coordinates are based on the NAD
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a 83.
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not (b) Enforcement period. The safety
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a zone described in paragraph (a) of this
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human section will be enforced from July 10,
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves the 2016 through July 10, 2017, unless
of the Coast Guard. establishment of a safety zone that will terminated sooner by the COTP.
C. Collection of Information prohibit entry within the dielectric oil
spill, cleanup, and power cable repair (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
This rule will not call for a new area, and is therefore categorically the general regulations in 33 CFR
collection of information under the excluded from further review under 165.23, entry into, transiting, or
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the anchoring within this safety zone is
U.S.C. 3501–3520). Commandant Instruction. An prohibited unless authorized by the
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal environmental analysis checklist COTP or a designated on scene
Governments supporting this determination and a representative.
Categorical Exclusion Determination (3) An ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
A rule has implications for federalism
will be available in the docket where the COTP is any Coast Guard
under Executive Order 13132,
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek commissioned, warrant or petty officer
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
any comments or information that may or a Federal, State or local law
effect on the States, on the relationship
lead to the discovery of a significant enforcement officer designated by or
between the national government and
environmental impact from this rule.
the States, or on the distribution of assisting the COTP to act on his behalf.
power and responsibilities among the G. Protest Activities (4) Vessel operators must contact the
various levels of government. We have The Coast Guard respects the First COTP via the Command Center to
analyzed this rule under that Order and Amendment rights of protesters. obtain permission to enter or operate
have determined that it is consistent Protesters are asked to contact the within the safety zone. The COTP may
with the fundamental federalism person listed in the FOR FURTHER be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at
principles and preemption requirements INFORMATION CONTACT section to (718) 354–4353. Vessel operators given
described in Executive Order 13132. coordinate protest activities so that your
Also, this rule does not have tribal permission to enter or operate within
message can be received without the safety zone must comply with all
implications under Executive Order
jeopardizing the safety or security of directions given to them by the COTP,
13175, Consultation and Coordination
people, places or vessels. via the Command Center or an on-scene
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 representative.
direct effect on one or more Indian Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Dated: July 8, 2016.
tribes, on the relationship between the (water), Reporting and recordkeeping M.H. Day,
Federal Government and Indian tribes, requirements, Security measures, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
or on the distribution of power and Waterways. Port New York.
responsibilities between the Federal
For the reasons discussed in the [FR Doc. 2016–17332 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am]
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

federalism or Indian tribes, please CFR part 165 as follows:
contact the person listed in the FOR
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

Federal agencies to assess the effects of Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
their discretionary regulatory actions. In 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
particular, the Act addresses actions Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the ■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0648 to read as
aggregate, or by the private sector of follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:59:07
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:59:07

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from July 21, 2016 through July 10, 2017. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from July 10, 2016 through July 21, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email MST1 Kristina Pundt, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector New York; telephone 718-354-4352, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 47293
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 47293 - Safety Zone; Hudson River, Edgewater, NJ.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard