81 FR 47300 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, El Dorado County Air Quality Management District

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)

Page Range		47300-47302
FR Document		2016-17177

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the El Dorado County Air Quality Management District (EDCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We are approving a local emergency episode plan that describes actions that EDCAQMD must take in the event of dangerously high ambient ozone concentrations levels under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47300-47302]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0241; FRL-9948-08-Region 9]


Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, El Dorado County Air 
Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to approve a revision to the El Dorado County Air Quality 
Management District (EDCAQMD) portion of the California State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). We are approving a local emergency episode 
plan that describes actions that EDCAQMD must take in the event of 
dangerously high ambient ozone concentrations levels under the Clean 
Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further 
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 22, 2016. If 
we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will 
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2016-0241 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, 
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person 
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full 
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia 
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please 
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 
947 4115, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What plan did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this plan?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted plan?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the plan?
    B. Does the plan meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What plan did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the plan addressed by this action with the date that 
it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California 
Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                             Table 1--Submitted Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Local agency                              Plan title                  Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDCAQMD....................................  Ozone Emergency Episode Plan.......        01/12/16        04/06/16
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 21, 2016, the EPA determined that EDCAQMD's Ozone 
Emergency Episode Plan submittal met the completeness criteria in 40 
CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of this plan?

    There are no previous versions of this plan adopted by EDCAQMD or 
approved by EPA in the SIP.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted plan?

    The CAA requires the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality 
Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone and five other pollutants that are harmful 
to public health and the environment. Each state is required to submit 
to the EPA, within three years after the promulgation of a primary or 
secondary NAAQS, or any revision thereof, an infrastructure SIP 
revision that provides for the implementation, maintenance, and 
enforcement of such NAAQS. CAA section 110(a)(2) describes the contents 
required of such a plan that constitute the ``infrastructure'' of a 
state's air quality management program. The EDCAQMD Ozone Emergency 
Episode Plan is intended to fulfill the CAA Sec.  110(a)(2)(G) 
infrastructure SIP requirement.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the plan?

    SIPs must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)) and SIP 
revisions are restricted in how they can relax approved SIPs. This plan 
must also meet the infrastructure SIP requirements of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(G) and EPA's implementing regulations found in 40 CFR part 
51, subpart H (51.150 through 51.153).
    Guidance that we used to evaluate section 110(a)(2) CAA 
requirements includes: ``Guidance Document for Infrastructure State 
Implementation Plan Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 
110(a)(2)'', EPA (September 2013).

B. Does the plan meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe this plan is consistent with the relevant policy and 
guidance regarding enforceability, SIP relaxations and infrastructure 
SIPs. The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information 
about this plan and our evaluation.

[[Page 47301]]

C. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully 
approving the submitted plan because we believe it fulfills all 
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this 
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. 
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are 
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted plan. If we 
receive adverse comments by August 22, 2016, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct 
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in 
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive 
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective 
without further notice on September 19, 2016. This will incorporate the 
plan into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this plan and if that provision may 
be severed from the remainder of the plan, the EPA may adopt as final 
those provisions of the plan that are not the subject of an adverse 
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the 
EDCAQMD plan described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents 
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 
at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX (AIR4), 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105-3901.]

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2016. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final 
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel 
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed 
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an 
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so 
that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the 
comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged 
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 
307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 13, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by add ing paragraph (c)(473) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (473) A new regulation for the following AQMD was submitted on 
April 6, 2016 by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.

[[Page 47302]]

    (A) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) ``Ozone Emergency Episode Plan,'' adopted January 12, 2016.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-17177 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 47301

C. Public Comment and Final Action Management and Budget under publication of the rule in the Federal
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, Register. A major rule cannot take effect
the Act, the EPA is fully approving the October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, until 60 days after it is published in the
submitted plan because we believe it January 21, 2011); Federal Register. This action is not a
fulfills all relevant requirements. We do • does not impose an information ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
not think anyone will object to this collection burden under the provisions 804(2).
approval, so we are finalizing it without of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
proposing it in advance. However, in U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
the Proposed Rules section of this • is certified as not having a this action must be filed in the United
Federal Register, we are simultaneously significant economic impact on a States Court of Appeals for the
proposing approval of the same substantial number of small entities appropriate circuit by September 19,
submitted plan. If we receive adverse under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 2016. Filing a petition for
comments by August 22, 2016, we will U.S.C. 601 et seq.); reconsideration by the Administrator of
publish a timely withdrawal in the • does not contain any unfunded this final rule does not affect the finality
Federal Register to notify the public mandate or significantly or uniquely of this action for the purposes of judicial
that the direct final approval will not affect small governments, as described review nor does it extend the time
take effect and we will address the in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act within which a petition for judicial
comments in a subsequent final action of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); review may be filed, and shall not
• does not have Federalism postpone the effectiveness of such rule
based on the proposal. If we do not
implications as specified in Executive or action. Parties with objections to this
receive timely adverse comments, the
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, direct final rule are encouraged to file a
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on September 19, 1999); comment in response to the parallel
• is not an economically significant notice of proposed rulemaking for this
2016. This will incorporate the plan into
regulatory action based on health or action published in the Proposed Rules
the federally enforceable SIP.
Please note that if the EPA receives safety risks subject to Executive Order section of today’s Federal Register,
adverse comment on an amendment, 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); rather than file an immediate petition
• is not a significant regulatory action for judicial review of this direct final
paragraph, or section of this plan and if
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this
that provision may be severed from the
28355, May 22, 2001); direct final rule and address the
remainder of the plan, the EPA may
• is not subject to requirements of
adopt as final those provisions of the comment in the proposed rulemaking.
Section 12(d) of the National
plan that are not the subject of an This action may not be challenged later
Technology Transfer and Advancement
adverse comment. in proceedings to enforce its
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
III. Incorporation by Reference application of those requirements would
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
regulatory text that includes and Environmental protection, Air
incorporation by reference. In • does not provide the EPA with the pollution control, Incorporation by
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR discretionary authority to address, as reference, Intergovernmental relations,
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the appropriate, disproportionate human Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
incorporation by reference of the health or environmental effects, using requirements.
EDCAQMD plan described in the practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Dated: June 13, 2016.
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth Alexis Strauss,
below. The EPA has made, and will (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
continue to make, these documents
available electronically through to apply on any Indian reservation land Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy or in any other area where the EPA or of Federal Regulations is amended as
at U.S. Environmental Protection an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a follows:
Agency Region IX (AIR4), 75 Hawthorne tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have PART 52—APPROVAL AND
Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105–3901.]
tribal implications and will not impose PROMULGATION OF
IV. Statutory and Executive Order substantial direct costs on tribal IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Reviews governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
Under the Clean Air Act, the
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). continues to read as follows:
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the The Congressional Review Act, 5 Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
provisions of the Act and applicable U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); Business Regulatory Enforcement Subpart F—California
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by add
submissions, the EPA’s role is to that before a rule may take effect, the
ing paragraph (c)(473) to read as
approve state choices, provided that agency promulgating the rule must
follows:
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air submit a rule report, which includes a
Act. Accordingly, this action merely copy of the rule, to each House of the § 52.220 Identification of plan.
approves state law as meeting federal Congress and to the Comptroller General * * * * *
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

requirements and does not impose of the United States. The EPA will (c) * * *
additional requirements beyond those submit a report containing this action (473) A new regulation for the
imposed by state law. For that reason, and other required information to the following AQMD was submitted on
this action: U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of April 6, 2016 by the Governor’s
• Is not a significant regulatory action Representatives, and the Comptroller designee.
subject to review by the Office of General of the United States prior to (i) Incorporation by reference.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

47302 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

(A) El Dorado County Air Quality Confidential Business Information (CBI) (SCAQMD). More information about the
Management District. or other information whose disclosure is jurisdictional history of this area is
(1) ‘‘Ozone Emergency Episode Plan,’’ restricted by statute. Multimedia found in the EPA’s Technical Support
adopted January 12, 2016. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Document (TSD) accompanying this
* * * * * accompanied by a written comment. rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2016–17177 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am] The written comment is considered the CARB has since submitted and the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P official comment and should include EPA has approved into the California
discussion of all points you wish to SIP a series of NSR rules for MDAQMD
make. The EPA will generally not and SCAQMD referred to as Regulation
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION consider comments or comment XIII. These rules supersede, among
AGENCY contents located outside of the primary other rules, Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2.
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or This rulemaking action clarifies the
40 CFR Part 52 other file sharing system). For applicable NSR rules for the Mojave
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0583; FRL–9949–24– additional submission methods, please Desert air district by removing from the
Region 9] contact the person identified in the FOR Mojave Desert portion of the California
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. SIP RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and
Approval of California Air Plan For the full EPA public comment policy, 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1,
Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality information about CBI or multimedia and 213.2.
Management District, Riverside County submissions, and general guidance on RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and
Air Pollution Control District, and San making effective comments, please visit 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2,
Bernardino County Air Pollution http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ and 213.3 also address NSR
Control District commenting-epa-dockets. requirements. However, we can find no
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: evidence that RCAPCD Rules 203.1,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). Laura Lawrence, EPA Region IX, (415) 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules
972–3407, lawrence.laura@epa.gov. 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 were ever
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: submitted for SIP approval.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ Consequently, we are taking no action
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. on the rescission of RCAPCD Rules
action to approve rescissions from the 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD
Table of Contents
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3.
District (MDAQMD) portion of the I. Background
II. The State’s Submittal II. The State’s Submittal
California State Implementation Plan
A. What rules did the State submit for A. What rules did the State submit for
(SIP), as it applies to rules approved rescission?
into the SIP for the Riverside County Air rescission?
B. What are the purposes of the submitted
Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) rule rescissions? MDAQMD rescinded Rules 203.1,
and San Bernardino County Air III. Evaluation and Action 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 on
Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). A. How is the EPA evaluating the April 28, 2008, and CARB submitted the
These revisions concern superseded rescission of the rules?
rescissions adopted by MDAQMD as a
New Source Review (NSR) rules. We are B. Do the rule rescissions meet the
evaluation criteria? revision to the California SIP on October
approving the rescission of rules under 20, 2008. As noted above, these rules
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 C. Public Comment and Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews had originally been adopted by RCAPCD
(CAA or the Act). and SBCAPCD and approved by the
DATES: This rule is effective on I. Background EPA as part of the California SIP. More
September 19, 2016 without further The California Air Resources Board than a decade later, when MDAQMD
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse (CARB) submitted Riverside County Air was established, MDAQMD adopted the
comments by August 22, 2016. If we Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) rules that had been adopted by the
receive such comments, we will publish and San Bernardino County Air previous air pollution control district as
a timely withdrawal in the Federal Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) part of that agency’s initial set of rules
Register to notify the public that this Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2, which and regulations. MDAQMD’s submittal
direct final rule will not take effect. address Clean Air Act (CAA) of the rescissions to CARB for submittal
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, requirements for New Source Review to the EPA make it clear that the
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– (NSR) programs, to the EPA on June 6, rescissions relate to the corresponding
OAR–2015–0583 at http:// 1977 for inclusion in the California SIP. SIP rules from which the corresponding
www.regulations.gov, or via email to The EPA approved RCAPCD Rules 213, MDAQMD rules derive. As such,
R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules CARB’s submittal of the rescission of
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 213, 213.1, and 213.2 into the SIP on MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213,
online instructions for submitting November 9, 1978 (43 FR 52237). The 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 constitutes the
comments. Once submitted, comments area under the jurisdiction of RCAPCD rescission of the corresponding SIP
cannot be edited or removed from and SBCAPCD at the time these rules rules, i.e., RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2,
Regulations.gov. For either manner of were submitted is now under the 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and
submission, the EPA may publish any jurisdiction of the Mojave Desert Air SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213,
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES

comment received to its public docket. Quality Management District 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. Table 1 lists
Do not submit electronically any (MDAQMD) and the South Coast Air these rules, along with SIP approval
information you consider to be Quality Management District dates (if any).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1

Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:58:51
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:58:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Direct final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 22, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect.
Contact		Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 947 4115, [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 47300
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Ozone and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements