81 FR 47302 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, Riverside County Air Pollution Control District, and San Bernardino County Air Pollution Control District
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 140 (July 21, 2016)
| Page Range | 47302-47304 | |
| FR Document | 2016-17171 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 140 (Thursday, July 21, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 47302-47304] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-17171] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0583; FRL-9949-24-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, Riverside County Air Pollution Control District, and San Bernardino County Air Pollution Control District AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve rescissions from the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP), as it applies to rules approved into the SIP for the Riverside County Air Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) and San Bernardino County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). These revisions concern superseded New Source Review (NSR) rules. We are approving the rescission of rules under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 22, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2015-0583 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Lawrence, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3407, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit for rescission? B. What are the purposes of the submitted rule rescissions? III. Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rescission of the rules? B. Do the rule rescissions meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Final Action IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background The California Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted Riverside County Air Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) and San Bernardino County Air Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2, which address Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for New Source Review (NSR) programs, to the EPA on June 6, 1977 for inclusion in the California SIP. The EPA approved RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 into the SIP on November 9, 1978 (43 FR 52237). The area under the jurisdiction of RCAPCD and SBCAPCD at the time these rules were submitted is now under the jurisdiction of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). More information about the jurisdictional history of this area is found in the EPA's Technical Support Document (TSD) accompanying this rulemaking. CARB has since submitted and the EPA has approved into the California SIP a series of NSR rules for MDAQMD and SCAQMD referred to as Regulation XIII. These rules supersede, among other rules, Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2. This rulemaking action clarifies the applicable NSR rules for the Mojave Desert air district by removing from the Mojave Desert portion of the California SIP RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2. RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 also address NSR requirements. However, we can find no evidence that RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 were ever submitted for SIP approval. Consequently, we are taking no action on the rescission of RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3. II. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit for rescission? MDAQMD rescinded Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 on April 28, 2008, and CARB submitted the rescissions adopted by MDAQMD as a revision to the California SIP on October 20, 2008. As noted above, these rules had originally been adopted by RCAPCD and SBCAPCD and approved by the EPA as part of the California SIP. More than a decade later, when MDAQMD was established, MDAQMD adopted the rules that had been adopted by the previous air pollution control district as part of that agency's initial set of rules and regulations. MDAQMD's submittal of the rescissions to CARB for submittal to the EPA make it clear that the rescissions relate to the corresponding SIP rules from which the corresponding MDAQMD rules derive. As such, CARB's submittal of the rescission of MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 constitutes the rescission of the corresponding SIP rules, i.e., RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. Table 1 lists these rules, along with SIP approval dates (if any). [[Page 47303]] Table 1--Rules Requested for Rescission From the Mojave Desert Portion of the California SIP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agency when rule Current agency was submitted to Rule No. Rule title SIP approval date SIP and FR citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 203.1 Special Permit Not in SIP. Provisions. MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 203.2 Eligibility of Not in SIP. Compensatory Emission Reductions. MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 213 Standards for Permits 11/09/78 43 FR to Construct: Air 52237. Quality Impact. MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 213.1 Standards for Permits 11/09/78 43 FR to Operate: Air 52237. Quality Impact. MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 213.2 Definitions for Rules 11/09/78 43 FR 213, 213.1, and 213.3. 52237. MDAQMD/SCAQMD................... RCAPCD 213.3 Additional Standards Not in SIP. for Permits to Construct and Operate. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 203.1 Special Permit Not in SIP. Provisions. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 203.2 Eligibility of Not in SIP. Compensatory Emission Reductions. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 213 Standards for Permits 11/09/78 43 FR to Construct: Air 52237. Quality Impact. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 213.1 Standards for Permits 11/09/78 43 FR to Operate: Air 52237. Quality Impact. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 213.2 Definitions for Rules 11/09/78 43 FR 213, 213.1, and 213.3. 52237. MDAQMD.......................... SBCAPCD 213.3 Additional Standards Not in SIP. for Permits to Construct and Operate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On November 18, 2008, we determined that CARB's October 20, 2008 SIP revision met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met before formal review by the EPA. B. What are the purposes of the submitted rule rescissions? SBCAPCD and RCAPCD rules 203.1, 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 have been superseded by MDAQMD Regulation XIII and SCAQMD Regulation XIII. CARB has requested that these SBCAPCD and RCAPCD rules be rescinded from the SIP for the purpose of clarifying the SIP and to avoid confusion as to the SIP status of these rules. This action represents an administrative change and does not result in changes to SIP approved Regulation XIII that contains the current NSR program. A more detailed discussion of these rules is found in the TSD accompanying this rulemaking. III. Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rescission of the rules? The EPA is evaluating the rules submitted for rescission by CARB to determine whether they were ever approved in the relevant portion of the SIP, and if they had been approved in the SIP, whether they have been superseded by approval of subsequent rules by the EPA. B. Do the rule rescissions meet the evaluation criteria? The provisions contained in RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 have been superseded by MDAQMD Regulation XIII, Rules 1300-1306 (61 FR 58133) and SCAQMD Regulation XIII, Rules 1301-1306, 1309-1310, 1313, and 1325 (50 FR 3906, 61 FR 64291, 64 FR 13514, 71 FR 35157, 80 FR 24821). The rescission of superseded rules is consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. We can find no evidence that RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 were ever approved into the SIP, therefore no action is necessary to remove them. The TSD has more information on our evaluation. C. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, the EPA is fully approving the rescission of RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2 because we have concluded that they were superseded years ago by approval by the EPA of subsequent rules and thus are no longer part of the applicable California SIP, and because rescission of them will clarify the contents of the MDAQMD portion of the SIP and avoid confusion as the SIP status of these rules. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule rescissions. If we receive adverse comments by August 22, 2016, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on September 19, 2016. This action will rescind specific rules from the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described [[Page 47304]] in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 19, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: June 24, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(39)(ii)(J) and (c)(39)(iv)(J) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan--in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (39) * * * (ii) * * * (J) Previously approved on November 9, 1978 in paragraph (c)(39)(ii)(B) of this section and now deleted without replacement: Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2. * * * * * (iv) * * * (J) Previously approved on November 9, 1978 in paragraph (c)(39)(iv)(B) of this section and now deleted without replacement: Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-17171 Filed 7-20-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![47302 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(A) El Dorado County Air Quality Confidential Business Information (CBI) (SCAQMD). More information about the
Management District. or other information whose disclosure is jurisdictional history of this area is
(1) ‘‘Ozone Emergency Episode Plan,’’ restricted by statute. Multimedia found in the EPA’s Technical Support
adopted January 12, 2016. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Document (TSD) accompanying this
* * * * * accompanied by a written comment. rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2016–17177 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am] The written comment is considered the CARB has since submitted and the
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P official comment and should include EPA has approved into the California
discussion of all points you wish to SIP a series of NSR rules for MDAQMD
make. The EPA will generally not and SCAQMD referred to as Regulation
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION consider comments or comment XIII. These rules supersede, among
AGENCY contents located outside of the primary other rules, Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2.
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or This rulemaking action clarifies the
40 CFR Part 52 other file sharing system). For applicable NSR rules for the Mojave
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0583; FRL–9949–24– additional submission methods, please Desert air district by removing from the
Region 9] contact the person identified in the FOR Mojave Desert portion of the California
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. SIP RCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1, and
Approval of California Air Plan For the full EPA public comment policy, 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules 213, 213.1,
Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality information about CBI or multimedia and 213.2.
Management District, Riverside County submissions, and general guidance on RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, and
Air Pollution Control District, and San making effective comments, please visit 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2,
Bernardino County Air Pollution http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ and 213.3 also address NSR
Control District commenting-epa-dockets. requirements. However, we can find no
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: evidence that RCAPCD Rules 203.1,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). Laura Lawrence, EPA Region IX, (415) 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD Rules
972–3407, lawrence.laura@epa.gov. 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 were ever
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: submitted for SIP approval.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ Consequently, we are taking no action
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. on the rescission of RCAPCD Rules
action to approve rescissions from the 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3 and SBCAPCD
Table of Contents
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management Rules 203.1, 203.2, and 213.3.
District (MDAQMD) portion of the I. Background
II. The State’s Submittal II. The State’s Submittal
California State Implementation Plan
A. What rules did the State submit for A. What rules did the State submit for
(SIP), as it applies to rules approved rescission?
into the SIP for the Riverside County Air rescission?
B. What are the purposes of the submitted
Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) rule rescissions? MDAQMD rescinded Rules 203.1,
and San Bernardino County Air III. Evaluation and Action 203.2, 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 on
Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD). A. How is the EPA evaluating the April 28, 2008, and CARB submitted the
These revisions concern superseded rescission of the rules?
rescissions adopted by MDAQMD as a
New Source Review (NSR) rules. We are B. Do the rule rescissions meet the
evaluation criteria? revision to the California SIP on October
approving the rescission of rules under 20, 2008. As noted above, these rules
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 C. Public Comment and Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews had originally been adopted by RCAPCD
(CAA or the Act). and SBCAPCD and approved by the
DATES: This rule is effective on I. Background EPA as part of the California SIP. More
September 19, 2016 without further The California Air Resources Board than a decade later, when MDAQMD
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse (CARB) submitted Riverside County Air was established, MDAQMD adopted the
comments by August 22, 2016. If we Pollution Control District (RCAPCD) rules that had been adopted by the
receive such comments, we will publish and San Bernardino County Air previous air pollution control district as
a timely withdrawal in the Federal Pollution Control District (SBCAPCD) part of that agency’s initial set of rules
Register to notify the public that this Rules 213, 213.1, and 213.2, which and regulations. MDAQMD’s submittal
direct final rule will not take effect. address Clean Air Act (CAA) of the rescissions to CARB for submittal
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, requirements for New Source Review to the EPA make it clear that the
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– (NSR) programs, to the EPA on June 6, rescissions relate to the corresponding
OAR–2015–0583 at http:// 1977 for inclusion in the California SIP. SIP rules from which the corresponding
www.regulations.gov, or via email to The EPA approved RCAPCD Rules 213, MDAQMD rules derive. As such,
R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments 213.1, and 213.2 and SBCAPCD Rules CARB’s submittal of the rescission of
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 213, 213.1, and 213.2 into the SIP on MDAQMD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213,
online instructions for submitting November 9, 1978 (43 FR 52237). The 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 constitutes the
comments. Once submitted, comments area under the jurisdiction of RCAPCD rescission of the corresponding SIP
cannot be edited or removed from and SBCAPCD at the time these rules rules, i.e., RCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2,
Regulations.gov. For either manner of were submitted is now under the 213, 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3 and
submission, the EPA may publish any jurisdiction of the Mojave Desert Air SBCAPCD Rules 203.1, 203.2, 213,
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
comment received to its public docket. Quality Management District 213.1, 213.2, and 213.3. Table 1 lists
Do not submit electronically any (MDAQMD) and the South Coast Air these rules, along with SIP approval
information you consider to be Quality Management District dates (if any).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47442/page/1.svg)
![47304 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 140 / Thursday, July 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act within which a petition for judicial ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); review may be filed, and shall not AGENCY
• Does not have Federalism postpone the effectiveness of such rule
implications as specified in Executive or action. Parties with objections to this 40 CFR Part 180
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, direct final rule are encouraged to file a [EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0646; FRL–9948–28]
1999); comment in response to the parallel
• Is not an economically significant notice of proposed rulemaking for this Cyprodinil; Pesticide Tolerances
regulatory action based on health or action published in the Proposed Rules
safety risks subject to Executive Order section of today’s Federal Register, AGENCY: Environmental Protection
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); rather than file an immediate petition Agency (EPA).
• Is not a significant regulatory action for judicial review of this direct final ACTION: Final rule.
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this
28355, May 22, 2001); direct final rule and address the SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
• Is not subject to requirements of comment in the proposed rulemaking. tolerances for residues of cyprodinil in
section 12(d) of the National This action may not be challenged later or on vegetable, tuberous and corm,
Technology Transfer and Advancement in proceedings to enforce its subgroup 1C and potato, wet peel.
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
application of those requirements would requested these tolerances under the
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
and (FFDCA).
• Does not provide the EPA with the Environmental protection, Air
discretionary authority to address, as pollution control, Incorporation by DATES: This regulation is effective July
appropriate, disproportionate human reference, Intergovernmental relations, 21, 2016. Objections and requests for
health or environmental effects, using Reporting and recordkeeping hearings must be received on or before
practicable and legally permissible requirements. September 19, 2016, and must be filed
methods, under Executive Order 12898 Dated: June 24, 2016.
in accordance with the instructions
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Alexis Strauss,
In addition, the SIP is not approved Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. INFORMATION).
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a of Federal Regulations is amended as identified by docket identification (ID)
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of follows: number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0646, is
Indian country, the rule does not have available at http://www.regulations.gov
tribal implications and will not impose PART 52—APPROVAL AND or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
substantial direct costs on tribal PROMULGATION OF Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
governments or preempt tribal law as IMPLEMENTATION PLANS in the Environmental Protection Agency
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
The Congressional Review Act, 5 continues to read as follows: Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
Business Regulatory Enforcement is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides Subpart F—California Monday through Friday, excluding legal
that before a rule may take effect, the holidays. The telephone number for the
agency promulgating the rule must ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
submit a rule report, which includes a adding paragraphs (c)(39)(ii)(J) and and the telephone number for the OPP
copy of the rule, to each House of the (c)(39)(iv)(J) to read as follows: Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
Congress and to the Comptroller General the visitor instructions and additional
of the United States. The EPA will § 52.220 Identification of plan—in part.
information about the docket available
submit a report containing this action * * * * * at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
and other required information to the (c) * * * FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of (39) * * * Susan Lewis, Registration Division
Representatives, and the Comptroller (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
General of the United States prior to (ii) * * *
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
publication of the rule in the Federal (J) Previously approved on November Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
Register. A major rule cannot take effect 9, 1978 in paragraph (c)(39)(ii)(B) of this DC 20460–0001; main telephone
until 60 days after it is published in the section and now deleted without number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
Federal Register. This action is not a replacement: Rules 213, 213.1, and RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 213.2.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
804(2). * * * * *
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean I. General Information
(iv) * * *
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United (J) Previously approved on November A. Does this action apply to me?
States Court of Appeals for the 9, 1978 in paragraph (c)(39)(iv)(B) of You may be potentially affected by
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
appropriate circuit by September 19, this section and now deleted without this action if you are an agricultural
2016. Filing a petition for replacement: Rules 213, 213.1, and producer, food manufacturer, or
reconsideration by the Administrator of 213.2. pesticide manufacturer. The following
this final rule does not affect the finality * * * * * list of North American Industrial
of this action for the purposes of judicial [FR Doc. 2016–17171 Filed 7–20–16; 8:45 am] Classification System (NAICS) codes is
review nor does it extend the time BILLING CODE 6560–50–P not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:56 Jul 20, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\21JYR1.SGM 21JYR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47442/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-08 07:59:16
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 07:59:16
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on September 19, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 22, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Laura Lawrence, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3407, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 47302 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR