81_FR_47874 81 FR 47733 - Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 17A

81 FR 47733 - Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 17A

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 141 (July 22, 2016)

Page Range47733-47736
FR Document2016-17272

NMFS issues regulations to implement Amendment 17A to the Fishery Management Plan for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP), as prepared and submitted by the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) Fishery Management Council (Council). This final rule extends the current Gulf commercial shrimp permit moratorium for 10 more years. The intent of this final rule and Amendment 17A is to protect federally managed Gulf shrimp stocks while promoting catch efficiency, economic efficiency, and stability in the fishery.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 141 (Friday, July 22, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 141 (Friday, July 22, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47733-47736]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 622

[Docket No. 160222132-6585-02]
RIN 0648-BF77


Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; 
Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Amendment 17A

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to implement Amendment 17A to the 
Fishery Management Plan for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico 
(FMP), as prepared and submitted by the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) Fishery 
Management Council (Council). This final rule extends the current Gulf 
commercial shrimp permit moratorium for 10 more years. The intent of 
this final rule and Amendment 17A is to protect federally managed Gulf 
shrimp stocks while promoting catch efficiency, economic efficiency, 
and stability in the fishery.

DATES: This rule is effective August 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of Amendment 17A, which includes an 
environmental assessment, a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis, and a 
regulatory impact review, may be obtained from the Southeast Regional 
Office Web site at http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_fisheries/gulf_fisheries/shrimp/2016/am17a/index.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727-824-
5305, or email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The shrimp fishery in the Gulf is managed 
under the FMP. The FMP was prepared by the Council and implemented 
through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under the authority of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
Stevens Act).
    On April 5, 2016, NMFS published a notice of availability for 
Amendment 17A and requested public comment (81 FR 19547). On April 14, 
2016, NMFS published a proposed rule for Amendment 17A and requested 
public comment (81 FR 22042). The proposed rule and Amendment 17A 
outline the rationale for the actions contained in this final rule. A 
summary of the action implemented by Amendment 17A and this final rule 
is provided below.

Management Measure Contained in This Final Rule

    This final rule extends the Gulf shrimp Federal permit moratorium 
until October 26, 2026. Through Amendment 13 to the FMP, the Council 
established a 10-year moratorium on the issuance of new Federal 
commercial shrimp vessel permits (71 FR 56039, September 26, 2006). The 
moratorium on permits indirectly controls shrimping effort in Federal 
waters and thereby bycatch levels of juvenile red snapper and sea 
turtles. The final rule implementing the moratorium became effective 
October 26, 2006, and the moratorium permits became effective in March 
2007. Extending the moratorium for an additional 10 years until October 
26, 2026, is expected to maintain the biological, social, and economic 
benefits to the shrimp fishery achieved under

[[Page 47734]]

the moratorium permit over the past 10 years.

Comments and Responses

    NMFS received a total of 831 submissions from the public on 
Amendment 17A and the proposed rule. Of these submissions, 702 
expressed general support for an extension of the permit moratorium. 
Some comments within the submissions addressed issues beyond the scope 
of Amendment 17A or the proposed rule, such as prohibiting shrimp 
trawling to reduce the impact on sea turtles and other marine life and 
modifying the requirements for turtle excluder devices and observers. 
From the submissions, NMFS has identified six issues related to 
Amendment 17A and the proposed rule. These comments and NMFS' 
respective responses are summarized below.
    Comment 1: Extending the permit moratorium would protect and expand 
gains in the shrimp fishery by limiting potential exploitation. Gulf 
shrimp landings have only slightly declined during the past 10 years 
and catch per day has increased.
    Response: NMFS agrees that continuing the moratorium would 
constrain effort and protect economic gains from higher catch rates. 
Returning the fishery to open access could undo any positive effects of 
the moratorium.
    Removing the moratorium would allow an unlimited number of new 
entrants into the commercial shrimp fishery and could have negative 
effects if the fishery then became overcapitalized. Overcapitalization 
or effort increases could lead to increases in sea turtle and red 
snapper bycatch and could result in additional requirements to reduce 
bycatch.
    Before the moratorium was implemented, increasing fuel costs, 
decreasing shrimp prices, and increasing foreign shrimp imports were 
all contributing to the overcapitalization of the commercial shrimp 
fleet. Since implementation of the moratorium, the catch per unit 
effort for the offshore shrimp fishery increased and has remained 
relatively constant. Additional effort in the fishery could negate, or 
at least lessen, profitability for the Gulf shrimp fleet as a whole.
    Comment 2: There is no need for continuing the moratorium because 
of the decreasing number of valid permits over last 10 years.
    Response: NMFS disagrees that the moratorium should be allowed to 
expire. The Council determined, and NMFS agrees, that extending the 
moratorium for an additional 10 years will continue stability for the 
fishery. As explained in the response to Comment 1, continuing the 
moratorium would constrain effort and protect economic gains from 
higher catch rates. The moratorium also indirectly controls effort and, 
therefore, bycatch levels of juvenile red snapper and sea turtles. 
Returning to an open access fishery would promote a return to less 
stable economic conditions.
    Comment 3: Continuing the permit moratorium will help protect sea 
turtles and other marine life.
    Response: NMFS agrees. In 2014, NMFS issued a biological opinion on 
the continued authorization of the Southeast U.S. shrimp fisheries in 
Federal waters on threatened and endangered species (including sea 
turtles) and designated critical habitat, in accordance with the 
Endangered Species Act (ESA). The sea turtle effects analyses and 
incidental take statement in the opinion were based on the expectation 
that future total effort levels in the southeastern shrimp fisheries 
would remain at or below 2009 effort levels. An increase in shrimp 
effort greater than the 2009 level may require re-initiation of the 
Endangered Species Act consultation and further rulemaking to address 
any increased effects on sea turtles. Continuing the moratorium would 
cap effort and reduce the chance of exceeding the 2009 effort levels, 
thereby continuing to limit any adverse effects of the shrimp fishery 
on sea turtles and other marine life.
    Comment 4: Gulf shrimp permit holders who have lost their 
moratorium permit due to non-renewal should be allowed to re-apply for 
a shrimp permit.
    Response: NMFS disagrees. The purpose of the moratorium was to 
limit the number of permits available to fish for shrimp because the 
fishery was overcapitalized, as described in the response to Comment 1.
    The Federal Gulf shrimp moratorium permit is renewable for up to 1 
year from its date of expiration. NMFS sends a renewal letter and 
permit application to the permit holder 1 month prior to the permit's 
expiration date. After a year with no permit renewal, a permit is 
terminated and permanently removed from the permit pool. However, valid 
permits are fully transferable, which may allow someone who has lost a 
permit as a result of non-renewal to obtain a new permit.
    Comment 5: As a result of the moratorium, the current market price 
of permits is too high.
    Response: NMFS disagrees. Based on the best available information, 
the current average price of a moratorium permit is approximately 
$5,000, and this price has been relatively constant since the 
moratorium was put in place. Thus, permits are not any more costly than 
they were 10 years ago, and in fact are likely less costly in real 
(inflation-adjusted) terms. Moreover, as previously noted, average 
profitability in the fishery has improved in recent years. An 
economically efficient business desiring to enter the fishery would be 
expected to recoup this cost relatively quickly and, thus, NMFS does 
not consider the cost of obtaining a permit to be onerous for 
businesses wanting to enter the fishery.
    Comment 6: Permit holders who sub-lease shrimp moratorium permits 
should be required to forfeit the permits.
    Response: NMFS disagrees. Although shrimp moratorium permits are 
fully transferable and a permit may be transferred to a vessel that is 
leased, there is no mechanism to sub-lease a permit through NMFS. To 
the extent the commenter is stating that the permits should not be 
transferable, economic efficiency is promoted when resources are 
allowed to shift to their most valuable use. The full transferability 
of permits is expected to improve economic efficiency by allowing those 
who place the greatest economic value on these permits to buy them. Any 
restrictions on the transferability of permits would be expected to 
reduce economic efficiency in the fishery, contrary to the objectives 
of Amendment 17A and this final rule.

Classification

    The Regional Administrator, Southeast Region, NMFS has determined 
that this final rule is consistent with Amendment 17A, the FMP, the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
    This final rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for this 
rule.
    The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce 
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration (SBA) during the proposed rule stage that this rule, if 
adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. NMFS did not receive any comments from SBA's 
Office of Advocacy or the public on the certification in the proposed 
rule. NMFS received two comments regarding the economic analysis of 
Amendment 17A and the proposed rule. One comment suggested that the 
current market price of moratorium permits is too high and the other 
comment stated that permit holders who sub-lease shrimp moratorium 
permits should be required

[[Page 47735]]

to forfeit the permits. NMFS disagrees with these comments as explained 
in the responses to comments 5 and 6, above. The factual basis for the 
certification was published in the proposed rule and is repeated below.
    The current moratorium on Gulf shrimp permits became effective on 
October 26, 2006 (71 FR 56039, September 26, 2006). This final rule 
extends the current moratorium on Federal Gulf shrimp permits until 
October 26, 2026. The purpose of this rule is to maintain the 
biological, social, and economic benefits to the Gulf shrimp fishery 
achieved under the current moratorium. The objectives of this rule are 
to protect federally managed Gulf shrimp stocks, and promote catch 
efficiency, economic efficiency, and stability in the Gulf shrimp 
fishery.
    This final rule is expected to directly regulate businesses that 
possess Federal Gulf shrimp moratorium permits. As of September 21, 
2015, there were 1,464 vessels with valid or renewable Gulf shrimp 
moratorium permits. Although some permits are thought to be held by 
businesses with the same or substantively the same individual owners, 
and thus would likely be considered affiliated, ownership data for Gulf 
shrimp permit holders is incomplete and thus it is not currently 
feasible to accurately determine whether businesses that have these 
permits are in fact affiliated. NMFS is currently making changes to its 
permit application forms so that such determinations can be accurately 
made for future regulatory actions in this fishery. As a result of the 
incomplete ownership data, for purposes of this analysis, NMFS assumes 
each vessel is independently owned by a single business, which will 
result in an overestimate of the actual number of businesses directly 
regulated by this final rule. Thus, NMFS estimates the number of 
businesses directly regulated by this final rule to be 1,464.
    Based on landings and economic data from 2013, which is the most 
current year for which complete economic data is available, all of 
these businesses are thought to be primarily engaged in shellfish 
harvesting activities (e.g., Gulf shrimp, South Atlantic shrimp, and 
Atlantic sea scallops fisheries). In 2013, the primary source of gross 
revenue for approximately 84 percent of these businesses was landings 
from one or more of these shellfish fisheries, while the other 16 
percent did not have commercial landings in any fishery. A certain 
percentage of businesses with Gulf shrimp permits are usually inactive 
in the Gulf shrimp fishery in a given year, because of economic 
conditions in that fishery, other fisheries, or other industries (e.g., 
oil and gas) in which these businesses, their owners, and their crew 
sometimes participate. Some businesses may have also been inactive due 
to issues associated with the Deepwater Horizon MC252 event in 2010, 
and subsequent payouts from British Petroleum (BP). NMFS only possesses 
data on such payouts and other transfer payments for a sample of the 
permitted businesses, and thus cannot confirm the extent to which such 
payouts contributed to the lack of commercial harvesting activity by 
all of the inactive businesses. Given the lack of data to the contrary 
and because these businesses possess Gulf shrimp moratorium permits, 
for the purpose of this analysis, these 1,464 businesses are assumed to 
be primarily engaged in commercial shellfish harvesting.
    From 2011 through 2013, the greatest average annual gross revenue 
earned by a single business was approximately $2.48 million. On 
average, a business with a Gulf shrimp moratorium permit had an annual 
gross revenue of approximately $247,000, annual net revenue from 
operations (commercial fishing activities) of approximately $6,300, and 
an annual economic profit of approximately $37,000. All monetary 
estimates are in 2001 dollars. Average annual economic profit was 
greater between 2011 and 2013 compared to the 2006 through 2009 time 
period, and greater than net revenue from operations, partly because of 
non-fishing related income, mostly in the form of payouts from BP 
(i.e., transfer payments) due to the Deepwater Horizon MC252 event in 
2010. Thus, although the average profit margin from 2011 through 2013 
was nearly 15 percent of gross revenue, the average margin from 
operations was only about 2.6 percent. Though relatively small, this 
margin from operations is still greater than what these businesses 
earned between 2006 and 2009 when net revenue from operations was 
generally negative, on average.
    On December 29, 2015, NMFS issued a final rule establishing a small 
business size standard of $11 million in annual gross receipts for all 
businesses primarily engaged in the commercial fishing industry (NAICS 
11411) for Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) compliance purposes only 
(80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). The $11 million standard became 
effective on July 1, 2016, and is to be used in place of the SBA's 
current standards of $20.5 million, $5.5 million, and $7.5 million for 
the finfish (NAICS 114111), shellfish (NAICS 114112), and other marine 
fishing (NAICS 114119) sectors of the U.S. commercial fishing industry 
in all NMFS rules subject to the RFA after July 1, 2016. Id. at 81194.
    Pursuant to the RFA, and prior to July 1, 2016, a certification was 
developed for this regulatory action using SBA's size standards. NMFS 
has reviewed the analyses prepared for this regulatory action in light 
of the new size standard. All of the entities directly regulated by 
this regulatory action are shellfish commercial fishing businesses and 
were considered small under the SBA's size standards, and thus they all 
would continue to be considered small under the new standard. Thus, 
NMFS has determined that the new size standard does not affect analyses 
prepared for this regulatory action.
    Based on the information above, a reduction in profits for a 
substantial number of small entities is not expected. The Chief Counsel 
for Regulation of the Department of Commerce hereby reaffirms that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. Because this final rule, if implemented, is 
not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities, a final regulatory flexibility analysis is 
not required and none has been prepared.
    No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules have been 
identified. This final rule will not establish any new reporting or 
record-keeping requirements.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622

    Commercial, Fisheries, Fishing, Gulf, Permits, Shrimp.

    Dated: July 14, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended 
as follows:

PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND SOUTH 
ATLANTIC

0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.


0
2. In Sec.  622.50, revise the introductory text of paragraph (b) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  622.50  Permits, permit moratorium, and endorsements.

* * * * *
    (b) Moratorium on commercial vessel permits for Gulf shrimp. The 
provisions

[[Page 47736]]

of this paragraph (b) are applicable through October 26, 2026.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-17272 Filed 7-21-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                         47733

                                           49 CFR 396.17, a rule that requires all                  program, but these vehicles are not used              Management Council (Council). This
                                           CMVs to be inspected at least once                       in that State. Is the motor carrier                   final rule extends the current Gulf
                                           every 12 months in accordance with                       required to make sure the vehicles are                commercial shrimp permit moratorium
                                           Appendix G to the FMCSRs (‘‘Minimum                      inspected under that State’s program in               for 10 more years. The intent of this
                                           Periodic Inspection Standards’’), and 49                 order to meet the Federal periodic                    final rule and Amendment 17A is to
                                           CFR 396.23, a rule that identifies                       inspection requirements?                              protect federally managed Gulf shrimp
                                           alternative inspections that are                            Guidance: If the State requires all                stocks while promoting catch efficiency,
                                           considered equivalent to the annual                      vehicles registered in the State to be                economic efficiency, and stability in the
                                           inspection required under 49 CFR                         inspected through its mandatory                       fishery.
                                           396.17. The Agency interpreted the                       program, then the motor carrier must                  DATES: This rule is effective August 22,
                                           regulations to permit a roadside                         use the State program to satisfy the                  2016.
                                           inspection to be considered as                           Federal requirements. If, however, the                ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of
                                           equivalent to the annual inspection. The                 State inspection program includes an                  Amendment 17A, which includes an
                                           regulatory guidance was republished on                   exception or exemption for vehicles                   environmental assessment, a Regulatory
                                           April 4, 1997, at 62 FR 16370.                           which are registered in the State but                 Flexibility Act analysis, and a regulatory
                                              A final rule issued by FMCSA,                         domiciled outside of the State, then the              impact review, may be obtained from
                                           published elsewhere in today’s issue of                  motor carrier may meet the Federal                    the Southeast Regional Office Web site
                                           the Federal Register, amends 49 CFR                      requirements through a self-inspection,               at http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/
                                           396.17(f) and removes 49 CFR 396.23(a)                   a third party inspection, or a periodic               sustainable_fisheries/gulf_fisheries/
                                           to eliminate the option for a motor                      inspection performed in any State with                shrimp/2016/am17a/index.html.
                                           carrier to meet the periodic inspection                  a program that the Federal Motor Carrier              FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                           requirements through roadside                            Administration (FMCSA) determines is                  Susan Gerhart, telephone: 727–824–
                                           inspections.                                             comparable to, or as effective as, the                5305, or email: Susan.Gerhart@
                                              Because not every element of                          part 396 requirements.                                noaa.gov.
                                           Appendix G is reviewed/inspected
                                           during a roadside inspection conducted                   Section 396.23, Question 1                            SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
                                           under the North American Standard                          Question 1: Can a violation-free                    shrimp fishery in the Gulf is managed
                                           Inspection, most roadside inspections                    Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance                    under the FMP. The FMP was prepared
                                           do not meet the periodic (annual)                        (CVSA) Level I or Level V inspection be               by the Council and implemented
                                           inspection requirements under 49 CFR                     used to satisfy the periodic inspection               through regulations at 50 CFR part 622
                                           396.17. For this reason, FMCSA does                      requirements of § 396.17?                             under the authority of the Magnuson-
                                           not believe it is appropriate to continue                  Guidance: No, a CVSA Level I or                     Stevens Fishery Conservation and
                                           to allow motor carriers to use roadside                  Level V inspection is not equivalent to               Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
                                           inspections conducted by enforcement                     the Federal periodic inspection                       Act).
                                           officials to satisfy the annual inspection               requirements.                                            On April 5, 2016, NMFS published a
                                           requirements in 49 CFR 396.17(f). Motor                                                                        notice of availability for Amendment
                                                                                                      Issued on July 14, 2016.
                                           carriers or their agents will now be                                                                           17A and requested public comment (81
                                                                                                    T.F. Scott Darling, III,                              FR 19547). On April 14, 2016, NMFS
                                           required to complete a periodic
                                                                                                    Acting Administrator.                                 published a proposed rule for
                                           inspection of every CMV under their
                                           control in accordance with Appendix G                    [FR Doc. 2016–17362 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]           Amendment 17A and requested public
                                           at least once every 12 months,                           BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P                                comment (81 FR 22042). The proposed
                                           irrespective of whether a roadside                                                                             rule and Amendment 17A outline the
                                           inspection is performed, unless the                                                                            rationale for the actions contained in
                                           vehicle is subject to a mandatory State                  DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                this final rule. A summary of the action
                                           inspection program in accordance with                                                                          implemented by Amendment 17A and
                                           49 CFR 396.23 which has been                             National Oceanic and Atmospheric                      this final rule is provided below.
                                           determined to be as effective as the                     Administration
                                                                                                                                                          Management Measure Contained in
                                           requirements of 49 CFR 396.17.                                                                                 This Final Rule
                                              Given the amendments to 49 CFR                        50 CFR Part 622
                                           396.17(f) discussed above, the final rule                                                                        This final rule extends the Gulf
                                                                                                    [Docket No. 160222132–6585–02]
                                           also removes 49 CFR 396.23(a), which                                                                           shrimp Federal permit moratorium until
                                           currently permits a roadside inspection                  RIN 0648–BF77                                         October 26, 2026. Through Amendment
                                           program of a State or other jurisdiction                                                                       13 to the FMP, the Council established
                                                                                                    Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of                   a 10-year moratorium on the issuance of
                                           to be considered as meeting the periodic                 Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
                                           inspection requirements of 49 CFR                                                                              new Federal commercial shrimp vessel
                                                                                                    Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico;                        permits (71 FR 56039, September 26,
                                           396.17.                                                  Amendment 17A
                                              As a result of the final rule, and to                                                                       2006). The moratorium on permits
                                           maintain consistency between the                         AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                    indirectly controls shrimping effort in
                                           amended FMCSRs and the published                         Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                  Federal waters and thereby bycatch
                                           regulatory guidance, two regulatory                      Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                    levels of juvenile red snapper and sea
                                           guidance questions/answers are                           Commerce.                                             turtles. The final rule implementing the
                                           amended as follows:                                      ACTION: Final rule.                                   moratorium became effective October
                                                                                                                                                          26, 2006, and the moratorium permits
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                           Section 396.17, Question 1                               SUMMARY:   NMFS issues regulations to                 became effective in March 2007.
                                             Question 1: Some of a motor carrier’s                  implement Amendment 17A to the                        Extending the moratorium for an
                                           vehicles are registered in a State with a                Fishery Management Plan for the                       additional 10 years until October 26,
                                           mandated inspection program which                        Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico                  2026, is expected to maintain the
                                           has been determined to be as effective                   (FMP), as prepared and submitted by                   biological, social, and economic benefits
                                           as the Federal periodic inspection                       the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) Fishery                     to the shrimp fishery achieved under


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:57 Jul 21, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00045   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM   22JYR1


                                           47734                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           the moratorium permit over the past 10                   1, continuing the moratorium would                    permits are not any more costly than
                                           years.                                                   constrain effort and protect economic                 they were 10 years ago, and in fact are
                                                                                                    gains from higher catch rates. The                    likely less costly in real (inflation-
                                           Comments and Responses
                                                                                                    moratorium also indirectly controls                   adjusted) terms. Moreover, as previously
                                              NMFS received a total of 831                          effort and, therefore, bycatch levels of              noted, average profitability in the
                                           submissions from the public on                           juvenile red snapper and sea turtles.                 fishery has improved in recent years. An
                                           Amendment 17A and the proposed rule.                     Returning to an open access fishery                   economically efficient business desiring
                                           Of these submissions, 702 expressed                      would promote a return to less stable                 to enter the fishery would be expected
                                           general support for an extension of the                  economic conditions.                                  to recoup this cost relatively quickly
                                           permit moratorium. Some comments                            Comment 3: Continuing the permit                   and, thus, NMFS does not consider the
                                           within the submissions addressed issues                  moratorium will help protect sea turtles              cost of obtaining a permit to be onerous
                                           beyond the scope of Amendment 17A or                     and other marine life.                                for businesses wanting to enter the
                                           the proposed rule, such as prohibiting                      Response: NMFS agrees. In 2014,                    fishery.
                                           shrimp trawling to reduce the impact on                  NMFS issued a biological opinion on                      Comment 6: Permit holders who sub-
                                           sea turtles and other marine life and                    the continued authorization of the                    lease shrimp moratorium permits
                                           modifying the requirements for turtle                    Southeast U.S. shrimp fisheries in                    should be required to forfeit the permits.
                                           excluder devices and observers. From                     Federal waters on threatened and                         Response: NMFS disagrees. Although
                                           the submissions, NMFS has identified                     endangered species (including sea                     shrimp moratorium permits are fully
                                           six issues related to Amendment 17A                      turtles) and designated critical habitat,             transferable and a permit may be
                                           and the proposed rule. These comments                    in accordance with the Endangered                     transferred to a vessel that is leased,
                                           and NMFS’ respective responses are                       Species Act (ESA). The sea turtle effects             there is no mechanism to sub-lease a
                                           summarized below.                                        analyses and incidental take statement                permit through NMFS. To the extent the
                                              Comment 1: Extending the permit                       in the opinion were based on the                      commenter is stating that the permits
                                           moratorium would protect and expand                      expectation that future total effort levels           should not be transferable, economic
                                           gains in the shrimp fishery by limiting                  in the southeastern shrimp fisheries                  efficiency is promoted when resources
                                           potential exploitation. Gulf shrimp                      would remain at or below 2009 effort                  are allowed to shift to their most
                                           landings have only slightly declined                     levels. An increase in shrimp effort                  valuable use. The full transferability of
                                           during the past 10 years and catch per                   greater than the 2009 level may require               permits is expected to improve
                                           day has increased.                                       re-initiation of the Endangered Species               economic efficiency by allowing those
                                              Response: NMFS agrees that                            Act consultation and further rulemaking               who place the greatest economic value
                                           continuing the moratorium would                          to address any increased effects on sea               on these permits to buy them. Any
                                           constrain effort and protect economic                    turtles. Continuing the moratorium                    restrictions on the transferability of
                                           gains from higher catch rates. Returning                 would cap effort and reduce the chance                permits would be expected to reduce
                                           the fishery to open access could undo                    of exceeding the 2009 effort levels,                  economic efficiency in the fishery,
                                           any positive effects of the moratorium.                  thereby continuing to limit any adverse               contrary to the objectives of
                                              Removing the moratorium would                         effects of the shrimp fishery on sea                  Amendment 17A and this final rule.
                                           allow an unlimited number of new                         turtles and other marine life.
                                           entrants into the commercial shrimp                         Comment 4: Gulf shrimp permit                      Classification
                                           fishery and could have negative effects                  holders who have lost their moratorium                   The Regional Administrator,
                                           if the fishery then became                               permit due to non-renewal should be                   Southeast Region, NMFS has
                                           overcapitalized. Overcapitalization or                   allowed to re-apply for a shrimp permit.              determined that this final rule is
                                           effort increases could lead to increases                    Response: NMFS disagrees. The                      consistent with Amendment 17A, the
                                           in sea turtle and red snapper bycatch                    purpose of the moratorium was to limit                FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and
                                           and could result in additional                           the number of permits available to fish               other applicable law.
                                           requirements to reduce bycatch.                          for shrimp because the fishery was                       This final rule has been determined to
                                              Before the moratorium was                             overcapitalized, as described in the                  be not significant for purposes of
                                           implemented, increasing fuel costs,                      response to Comment 1.                                Executive Order 12866.
                                           decreasing shrimp prices, and                               The Federal Gulf shrimp moratorium                    The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides
                                           increasing foreign shrimp imports were                   permit is renewable for up to 1 year                  the statutory basis for this rule.
                                           all contributing to the overcapitalization               from its date of expiration. NMFS sends                  The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
                                           of the commercial shrimp fleet. Since                    a renewal letter and permit application               the Department of Commerce certified
                                           implementation of the moratorium, the                    to the permit holder 1 month prior to                 to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
                                           catch per unit effort for the offshore                   the permit’s expiration date. After a year            Small Business Administration (SBA)
                                           shrimp fishery increased and has                         with no permit renewal, a permit is                   during the proposed rule stage that this
                                           remained relatively constant. Additional                 terminated and permanently removed                    rule, if adopted, would not have a
                                           effort in the fishery could negate, or at                from the permit pool. However, valid                  significant economic impact on a
                                           least lessen, profitability for the Gulf                 permits are fully transferable, which                 substantial number of small entities.
                                           shrimp fleet as a whole.                                 may allow someone who has lost a                      NMFS did not receive any comments
                                              Comment 2: There is no need for                       permit as a result of non-renewal to                  from SBA’s Office of Advocacy or the
                                           continuing the moratorium because of                     obtain a new permit.                                  public on the certification in the
                                           the decreasing number of valid permits                      Comment 5: As a result of the                      proposed rule. NMFS received two
                                           over last 10 years.                                      moratorium, the current market price of               comments regarding the economic
                                              Response: NMFS disagrees that the                     permits is too high.                                  analysis of Amendment 17A and the
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                           moratorium should be allowed to                             Response: NMFS disagrees. Based on                 proposed rule. One comment suggested
                                           expire. The Council determined, and                      the best available information, the                   that the current market price of
                                           NMFS agrees, that extending the                          current average price of a moratorium                 moratorium permits is too high and the
                                           moratorium for an additional 10 years                    permit is approximately $5,000, and this              other comment stated that permit
                                           will continue stability for the fishery. As              price has been relatively constant since              holders who sub-lease shrimp
                                           explained in the response to Comment                     the moratorium was put in place. Thus,                moratorium permits should be required


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:57 Jul 21, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00046   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM   22JYR1


                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                               47735

                                           to forfeit the permits. NMFS disagrees                   year, because of economic conditions in               fishing (NAICS 114119) sectors of the
                                           with these comments as explained in                      that fishery, other fisheries, or other               U.S. commercial fishing industry in all
                                           the responses to comments 5 and 6,                       industries (e.g., oil and gas) in which               NMFS rules subject to the RFA after July
                                           above. The factual basis for the                         these businesses, their owners, and their             1, 2016. Id. at 81194.
                                           certification was published in the                       crew sometimes participate. Some                         Pursuant to the RFA, and prior to July
                                           proposed rule and is repeated below.                     businesses may have also been inactive                1, 2016, a certification was developed
                                              The current moratorium on Gulf                        due to issues associated with the                     for this regulatory action using SBA’s
                                           shrimp permits became effective on                       Deepwater Horizon MC252 event in                      size standards. NMFS has reviewed the
                                           October 26, 2006 (71 FR 56039,                           2010, and subsequent payouts from                     analyses prepared for this regulatory
                                           September 26, 2006). This final rule                     British Petroleum (BP). NMFS only                     action in light of the new size standard.
                                           extends the current moratorium on                        possesses data on such payouts and                    All of the entities directly regulated by
                                           Federal Gulf shrimp permits until                        other transfer payments for a sample of               this regulatory action are shellfish
                                           October 26, 2026. The purpose of this                    the permitted businesses, and thus                    commercial fishing businesses and were
                                           rule is to maintain the biological, social,              cannot confirm the extent to which such               considered small under the SBA’s size
                                           and economic benefits to the Gulf                        payouts contributed to the lack of                    standards, and thus they all would
                                           shrimp fishery achieved under the                        commercial harvesting activity by all of              continue to be considered small under
                                           current moratorium. The objectives of                    the inactive businesses. Given the lack               the new standard. Thus, NMFS has
                                           this rule are to protect federally                       of data to the contrary and because these             determined that the new size standard
                                           managed Gulf shrimp stocks, and                          businesses possess Gulf shrimp                        does not affect analyses prepared for
                                           promote catch efficiency, economic                       moratorium permits, for the purpose of                this regulatory action.
                                           efficiency, and stability in the Gulf                    this analysis, these 1,464 businesses are
                                           shrimp fishery.                                          assumed to be primarily engaged in                       Based on the information above, a
                                              This final rule is expected to directly               commercial shellfish harvesting.                      reduction in profits for a substantial
                                           regulate businesses that possess Federal                    From 2011 through 2013, the greatest               number of small entities is not expected.
                                           Gulf shrimp moratorium permits. As of                    average annual gross revenue earned by                The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
                                           September 21, 2015, there were 1,464                     a single business was approximately                   Department of Commerce hereby
                                           vessels with valid or renewable Gulf                     $2.48 million. On average, a business                 reaffirms that the rule will not have a
                                           shrimp moratorium permits. Although                      with a Gulf shrimp moratorium permit                  significant economic impact on a
                                           some permits are thought to be held by                   had an annual gross revenue of                        substantial number of small entities.
                                           businesses with the same or                              approximately $247,000, annual net                    Because this final rule, if implemented,
                                           substantively the same individual                        revenue from operations (commercial                   is not expected to have a significant
                                           owners, and thus would likely be                         fishing activities) of approximately                  economic impact on a substantial
                                           considered affiliated, ownership data for                $6,300, and an annual economic profit                 number of small entities, a final
                                           Gulf shrimp permit holders is                            of approximately $37,000. All monetary                regulatory flexibility analysis is not
                                           incomplete and thus it is not currently                  estimates are in 2001 dollars. Average                required and none has been prepared.
                                           feasible to accurately determine whether                 annual economic profit was greater                       No duplicative, overlapping, or
                                           businesses that have these permits are                   between 2011 and 2013 compared to the                 conflicting Federal rules have been
                                           in fact affiliated. NMFS is currently                    2006 through 2009 time period, and                    identified. This final rule will not
                                           making changes to its permit                             greater than net revenue from                         establish any new reporting or record-
                                           application forms so that such                           operations, partly because of non-                    keeping requirements.
                                           determinations can be accurately made                    fishing related income, mostly in the
                                           for future regulatory actions in this                                                                          List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
                                                                                                    form of payouts from BP (i.e., transfer
                                           fishery. As a result of the incomplete                   payments) due to the Deepwater                          Commercial, Fisheries, Fishing, Gulf,
                                           ownership data, for purposes of this                     Horizon MC252 event in 2010. Thus,                    Permits, Shrimp.
                                           analysis, NMFS assumes each vessel is                    although the average profit margin from
                                                                                                                                                            Dated: July 14, 2016.
                                           independently owned by a single                          2011 through 2013 was nearly 15
                                           business, which will result in an                                                                              Samuel D. Rauch III,
                                                                                                    percent of gross revenue, the average
                                           overestimate of the actual number of                     margin from operations was only about                 Deputy Assistant for Regulatory Programs,
                                           businesses directly regulated by this                    2.6 percent. Though relatively small,                 National Marine Fisheries Service.
                                           final rule. Thus, NMFS estimates the                     this margin from operations is still                    For the reasons set out in the
                                           number of businesses directly regulated                  greater than what these businesses                    preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
                                           by this final rule to be 1,464.                          earned between 2006 and 2009 when                     as follows:
                                              Based on landings and economic data                   net revenue from operations was
                                           from 2013, which is the most current                     generally negative, on average.                       PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
                                           year for which complete economic data                       On December 29, 2015, NMFS issued                  CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND
                                           is available, all of these businesses are                a final rule establishing a small business            SOUTH ATLANTIC
                                           thought to be primarily engaged in                       size standard of $11 million in annual
                                           shellfish harvesting activities (e.g., Gulf              gross receipts for all businesses                     ■ 1. The authority citation for part 622
                                           shrimp, South Atlantic shrimp, and                       primarily engaged in the commercial                   continues to read as follows:
                                           Atlantic sea scallops fisheries). In 2013,               fishing industry (NAICS 11411) for
                                                                                                                                                              Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
                                           the primary source of gross revenue for                  Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
                                           approximately 84 percent of these                        compliance purposes only (80 FR                       ■ 2. In § 622.50, revise the introductory
                                           businesses was landings from one or                      81194, December 29, 2015). The $11                    text of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                           more of these shellfish fisheries, while                 million standard became effective on
                                           the other 16 percent did not have                        July 1, 2016, and is to be used in place              § 622.50 Permits, permit moratorium, and
                                           commercial landings in any fishery. A                    of the SBA’s current standards of $20.5               endorsements.
                                           certain percentage of businesses with                    million, $5.5 million, and $7.5 million               *     *    *     *    *
                                           Gulf shrimp permits are usually inactive                 for the finfish (NAICS 114111), shellfish               (b) Moratorium on commercial vessel
                                           in the Gulf shrimp fishery in a given                    (NAICS 114112), and other marine                      permits for Gulf shrimp. The provisions


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:57 Jul 21, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00047   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM   22JYR1


                                           47736                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           of this paragraph (b) are applicable
                                           through October 26, 2026.
                                           *     *     *    *     *
                                           [FR Doc. 2016–17272 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am]
                                           BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:57 Jul 21, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00048   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM   22JYR1



Document Created: 2016-07-22 02:38:04
Document Modified: 2016-07-22 02:38:04
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis rule is effective August 22, 2016.
ContactSusan Gerhart, telephone: 727-824- 5305, or email: [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 47733 
RIN Number0648-BF77
CFR AssociatedCommercial; Fisheries; Fishing; Gulf; Permits and Shrimp

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR