81 FR 47754 - Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Determination Pursuant to a Final Court Decision
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 141 (July 22, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 141 (July 22, 2016)
| Page Range | 47754-47756 | |
| FR Document | 2016-17308 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 141 (Friday, July 22, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 47754-47756] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-17308] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-912] Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Determination Pursuant to a Final Court Decision AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 1, 2010, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') sustained the remand redetermination made by the Department of Commerce (``Department'') pursuant to the CIT's remand of the final determination in the antidumping duty investigation on certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires (``OTR tires'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). This case arises out of the Department's final determination in the antidumping duty (``AD'') investigation on OTR tires from the PRC. See Certain New Pneumatic Off- The-Road-Tires from the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR 40485 (July 15, 2008), as amended by Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR 51624 (September 4, 2008) (collectively, ``Final Determination''). The Department notified the public that the final CIT judgment (See GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 08-00285, Slip Op. 10-112 (Ct. Int'l Trade October 1, 2010) (``GPX III'') in this case was not in harmony with the Department's final affirmative determination in the AD investigation of OTR tires from the PRC on October 12, 2010. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Decision of the Court of International Trade Not in Harmony, 75 FR 62504 (October 12, 2010) (``2010 Timken Notice''). As there is now a final and conclusive decision in this case, the Department is amending its final determination with respect to the antidumping duty rate calculated for the separate rate companies. DATES: Effective March 23, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482- 4987. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In July 2008, the Department published a final determination in which it found that OTR tires from the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less-than-fair-value (``LTFV'').\1\ As part of the Final Determination, the Department calculated a margin for the separate-rate [[Page 47755]] respondents of 12.91 percent.\2\ Starbright Tire Co., Ltd. (``Starbright''), its importer GPX International Tire Corporation (``GPX''), petitioners Titan Tire Corporation and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied and Industrial Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (collectively, ``Titan''), and domestic interested party Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (collectively, ``Bridgestone''), each timely challenged various aspects of the Final Determination to the CIT. The antidumping duty case was then consolidated with the companion countervailing duty case at the CIT. With regard to the antidumping duty case, among the issues raised before the Court was the valuation of wire input consumed by two of the respondent companies, Starbright and Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. (``TUTRIC''), under the factors of production methodology to calculate normal value in a non-market economy country pursuant to section 773(c)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Final Determination. \2\ Id., 73 FR at 51625. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On August 4, 2010, pursuant to the Department's request for a voluntary remand, the CIT remanded the wire input valuation issue to the Department for reconsideration or further explanation.\3\ In a remand redetermination filed on September 3, 2010, the Department determined that record evidence supported using a different surrogate value for the wire input consumed by Starbright and TUTRIC in the production of OTR tires.\4\ As a result of this change, the weighted- average dumping margin calculated for subject merchandise produced by Starbright and exported by Starbright/GPX changed from 29.93 percent to 31.79 percent, the weighted average dumping margin calculated for subject merchandise produced and exported by TUTRIC changed from 8.44 percent to 10.08 percent, and the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for separate rate companies changed from 12.91 percent to 13.92 percent.\5\ The CIT affirmed the Department's remand redetermination on October 1, 2010.\6\ On October 12, 2010, the Department notified the public that the final CIT judgment in this case was not in harmony with the Department's final affirmative determination in the AD investigation of OTR tires from the PRC.\7\ Subsequently, domestic litigation over issues pertaining to the consolidated countervailing duty case continued.\8\ On March 13, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``Federal Circuit'') issued a final and conclusive decision in this case, which no party appealed.\9\ Because there is now a final and conclusive court decision in this case, the Department is amending the final determination for the separate rate respondents. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 08-00285, Slip Op. 10-84 at *19-*20, *28 (Ct. Int'l Trade August 4, 2010) (``GPX II''). \4\ See Second Remand Redetermination, GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 08-00285, dated September 3, 2010, at 4-9. \5\ Id. at 9-12. \6\ See GPX III. \7\ See 2010 Timken Notice, 75 FR 62504. \8\ A summary of this litigation can be found in Certain New Pneumatic Off-the Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Corrected Notice of Decision of the Court of International Trade Not in Harmony and Corrected Notice of Amended Final Determination, 80 FR 31889 (June 4, 2015) (``2015 Timken Notice''). \9\ See GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, 780 F.3d 1136 (Fed. Cir. 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amended Final Determination Since the Final Determination, the Department has established a new cash deposit rate for TUTRIC and for Starbright.\10\ Therefore, this amended final determination does not change TUTRIC's or Starbright's cash deposit rates. Because there is now a final and conclusive court decision with respect to the Final Determination, the revised cash deposit rate for the separate rate companies is 13.92 percent. For those separate-rate companies that do not have a superseding cash deposit rate identified in the table below, the Department will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, adjusting the cash deposit rate for the below separate-rate companies to 13.92 percent, effective March 23, 2015.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ For Starbright/GPX, see Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the 2008-2009 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 22871 (April 25, 2011). For TUTRIC, see Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the 2009-2010 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Rescission, in Part, 77 FR 14495 (March 12, 2012). \11\ See 2015 Timken Notice; see also GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 08-00285, Slip Op. 15-46 (CIT May 18, 2015). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter Producer margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd............. Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd.... 13.92 Double Happiness Tyre Industries Double Happiness Tyre 13.92 Corp., Ltd. Industries Corp., Ltd. Jiangsu Feichi Co., Ltd.......... Jiangsu Feichi Co., Ltd. 13.92 Oriental Tyre Technology Limited. Midland Off The Road 13.92 Tire Co., Ltd. Oriental Tyre Technology Limited. Midland Specialty Tire 13.92 Co., Ltd. Oriental Tyre Technology Limited. Xuzhou Hanbang Tyres 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Etyre International Trade Shandong Xingda Tyre Co. 13.92 Co., Ltd. Ltd. Qingdao Etyre International Trade Shandong Xingyuan 13.92 Co., Ltd. International Trade Co. Ltd. Qingdao Etyre International Trade Shandong Xingyuan Rubber 13.92 Co., Ltd. Co. Ltd. Qingdao Hengda Tyres Co., Ltd.... Qingdao Hengda Tyres 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Milestone Tyre Co., Ltd.. Qingdao Shuanghe Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Milestone Tyre Co., Ltd.. Shandong Zhentai Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Milestone Tyre Co., Ltd.. Shifeng Double-Star Tire 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Milestone Tyre Co., Ltd.. Weifang Longtai Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd... Qingdao Qizhou Rubber 13.92 Co., Ltd. Qingdao Sinorient International Qingdao Hengda Tyres 13.92 Ltd. Co., Ltd. Qingdao Sinorient International Shifeng Double-Star Tire 13.92 Ltd. Co., Ltd. Qingdao Sinorient International Tengzhou Broncho Tyre 13.92 Ltd. Co., Ltd. Shandong Huitong Tyre Co., Ltd... Shandong Huitong Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Shandong Jinyu Tyre Co., Ltd..... Shandong Jinyu Tyre Co., 13.92 Ltd. Shandong Taishan Tyre Co., Ltd... Shandong Taishan Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre Co., Ltd Shandong Wanda Boto Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Shandong Xingyuan International Shangdong Xingda Tyre 13.92 Trading Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. [[Page 47756]] Shandong Xingyuan International Xingyuan Tyre Group Co., 13.92 Trading Co., Ltd. Ltd. Techking Tires Limited........... Shandong Xingda Tyre Co. 13.92 Ltd. Techking Tires Limited........... Shandong Xingyuan 13.92 International Trade Co. Ltd. Techking Tires Limited........... Shandong Xingyuan Rubber 13.92 Co. Ltd. Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd........... Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.. 13.92 Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd.... Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre 13.92 Co., Ltd. Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd./ Kenda Rubber (China) 13.92 Kenda Global. Co., Ltd. Qingdao Aonuo Tyre Co., Ltd...... Qingdao Aonuo Tyre Co., 13.92 Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 28, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-17308 Filed 7-21-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![47754 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Notices
Fees are set taking into account the whose data they process, which would (‘‘Department’’) pursuant to the CIT’s
operational costs borne by ITA to use more government resources remand of the final determination in the
administer and supervise the Privacy dedicated to administering and antidumping duty investigation on
Shield program. The Privacy Shield overseeing Privacy Shield. For example, certain new pneumatic off-the-road tires
program will require a significant if a company holds more data it could (‘‘OTR tires’’) from the People’s
commitment of resources and staff. The reasonably produce more questions and Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). This case
Privacy Shield Framework includes complaints from consumers and the arises out of the Department’s final
commitments from ITA to: European Union’s Data Protection determination in the antidumping duty
• Maintain a Privacy Shield Web site; Authorities (DPAs). ITA has committed (‘‘AD’’) investigation on OTR tires from
• verify self-certification to facilitating the resolution of the PRC. See Certain New Pneumatic
requirements submitted by individual complaints and to Off-The-Road-Tires from the People’s
organizations to participate in the communicating with the FTC and the Republic of China: Final Affirmative
program; DPAs regarding consumer complaints. Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
• expand efforts to follow up with Lastly, the fee increases between the Value and Partial Affirmative
organizations that have been removed tiers are based in part on projected Determination of Critical
from the Privacy Shield List; program costs and estimated Circumstances, 73 FR 40485 (July 15,
• search for and address false claims participation levels among companies 2008), as amended by Certain New
of participation; within each tier. Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the
• conduct periodic compliance People’s Republic of China: Notice of
reviews and assessments of the program; Conclusion
Amended Final Affirmative
• provide information regarding the Based on the information provided Determination of Sales at Less than Fair
program to targeted audiences; above, ITA believes that its Privacy Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 73
• increase cooperation with EU data Shield cost recovery fee schedule is FR 51624 (September 4, 2008)
protection authorities; consistent with the objective of OMB
• facilitate resolution of complaints (collectively, ‘‘Final Determination’’).
Circular A–25 to ‘‘promote efficient The Department notified the public
about non-compliance;
allocation of the nation’s resources by that the final CIT judgment (See GPX
• hold annual meetings with the
establishing charges for special benefits Int’l Tire Corp. v. United States, Consol.
European Commission and other
provided to the recipient that are at least Ct. No. 08–00285, Slip Op. 10–112 (Ct.
authorities to review the program, and
• provide an update of laws relevant as great as the cost to the U.S. Int’l Trade October 1, 2010) (‘‘GPX III’’)
to Privacy Shield. Government of providing the special in this case was not in harmony with
In setting the Privacy Shield fee benefits . . .’’ OMB Circular A–25(5)(b). the Department’s final affirmative
schedule, ITA determined that the ITA is providing the public with the determination in the AD investigation of
services provided offer special benefits opportunity to comment on the fee OTR tires from the PRC on October 12,
to an identifiable recipient beyond those schedule, and it will consider these 2010. See Certain New Pneumatic Off-
that accrue to the general public. ITA comments when it reassesses the fee the-Road Tires from the People’s
calculated the actual cost of providing schedule. ITA will reassess the fee Republic of China: Notice of Decision of
its services in order to provide a basis schedule after the first year of the Court of International Trade Not in
for setting each fee. Actual cost implementation and, in accordance with Harmony, 75 FR 62504 (October 12,
incorporates direct and indirect costs, OMB Circular A–25, at least every two 2010) (‘‘2010 Timken Notice’’). As there
including operations and maintenance, years thereafter. is now a final and conclusive decision
overhead, and charges for the use of Dated: July 20, 2016. in this case, the Department is
capital facilities. ITA also took into Edward M. Dean, amending its final determination with
account additional factors, including Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, respect to the antidumping duty rate
adequacy of cost recovery, affordability, International Trade Administration, U.S. calculated for the separate rate
and costs associated with alternative Department of Commerce. companies.
options available to U.S. organizations [FR Doc. 2016–17508 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am] DATES: Effective March 23, 2015.
for the receipt of personal data from the BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EU.
ITA is establishing a 5-tiered fee Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations,
schedule that will promote the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
participation of small organizations in International Trade Administration,
Privacy Shield. A multiple-tiered fee International Trade Administration U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
schedule allows ITA to offer the Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
[A–570–912] Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
organizations with lower revenue a
lower fee. In setting the 5 tiers, ITA 482–4987.
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
considered, in conjunction with the Tires From the People’s Republic of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
factors mentioned above: (1) The Small China: Notice of Amended Final Background
Business Administration’s guidance on Determination Pursuant to a Final
identifying SMEs in various industries Court Decision In July 2008, the Department
most likely to participate in the Privacy published a final determination in
Shield, such as computer services, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, which it found that OTR tires from the
International Trade Administration,
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
software and information services; (2) PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold
the likelihood that small companies Department of Commerce. in the United States at less-than-fair-
would be expected to receive less SUMMARY: On October 1, 2010, the value (‘‘LTFV’’).1 As part of the Final
personal data and thereby use fewer United States Court of International Determination, the Department
government resources; and (3) the Trade (‘‘CIT’’) sustained the remand calculated a margin for the separate-rate
likelihood that companies with higher redetermination made by the
revenue would have more customers Department of Commerce 1 See Final Determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:19 Jul 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM 22JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47895/page/1.svg)
![47756 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 141 / Friday, July 22, 2016 / Notices
Weighted-
average
Exporter Producer margin
(percent)
Shandong Xingyuan International Trading Co., Ltd ..................... Xingyuan Tyre Group Co., Ltd .................................................... 13.92
Techking Tires Limited .................................................................. Shandong Xingda Tyre Co. Ltd ................................................... 13.92
Techking Tires Limited .................................................................. Shandong Xingyuan International Trade Co. Ltd ........................ 13.92
Techking Tires Limited .................................................................. Shandong Xingyuan Rubber Co. Ltd .......................................... 13.92
Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd ................................................................... Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd .................................................................. 13.92
Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd .................................................. Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd ................................................. 13.92
Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd./Kenda Global ............................ Kenda Rubber (China) Co., Ltd ................................................... 13.92
Qingdao Aonuo Tyre Co., Ltd ....................................................... Qingdao Aonuo Tyre Co., Ltd ..................................................... 13.92
Notification to Interested Parties SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: on May 20, 2016, that it was initiating
This notice is issued and published in a proceeding under section 129 of the
Nature of the Proceeding
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1) and URAA to implement certain findings of
Section 129 of the Uruguay Rounds the WTO dispute settlement panel in
777(i)(1) of the Act. Agreement Act (‘‘URAA’’) 1 allows the United States—Anti-Dumping Measures
Dated: June 28, 2016. Department to amend, rescind, or on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
Paul Piquado, modify a determination found by a from VietNam (WTO/DS429) (‘‘Panel
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and WTO dispute settlement panel or the Report’’).7 On May 20, 2016, the
Compliance. Appellate Body to be inconsistent with Department issued its preliminary
[FR Doc. 2016–17308 Filed 7–21–16; 8:45 am] U.S. obligations under the Antidumping determination in this proceeding 8 in
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Agreement. Specifically, section which the Department recalculated the
129(b)(2) provides that, weighted-average dumping margin for
‘‘notwithstanding any provision of the the Minh Phu Group 9 from the AR4
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Tariff Act of 1930 . . ., ’’ within 180 Amended Final 10 by eliminating the
days after receipt of a written request denial of offsets for non-dumped sales
International Trade Administration from the U.S. Trade Representative, the On July 6, 2016, the Department
Department shall issue a determination solicited comments from interested
[A–552–802] that would render its actions not
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp inconsistent with an adverse finding of 7 See Letter from USTR, re: ‘‘Request to Comply
a WTO panel or the Appellate Body.2 with WTO Panel Report,’’ dated May 20, 2016. See
From the Socialist Republic of also Letter from the Department to All Interested
Vietnam: Notice of Implementation of The Statement of Administrative Parties, re: ‘‘Initiation of DS429,’’ dated May 20,
Action, URAA, H. Doc. 316, Vol. 1, 103d 2016.
Determination Under Section 129 of
Cong. (1994) (‘‘SAA’’), refers variously 8 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
to such a determination by the Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
and Partial Revocation of the Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado,
Department as a ‘‘new,’’ ‘‘second,’’ and
Antidumping Duty Order Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
‘‘different’’ determination.3 After Compliance, re: ‘‘Preliminary Determination Under
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, consulting with the Department and the Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act:
International Trade Administration, appropriate congressional committees, Antidumping Measures on Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of
Department of Commerce. the USTR may direct the Department to Vietnam,’’ dated May 20, 2016 (‘‘129 Preliminary
SUMMARY: On July 18, 2016, the implement, in whole or in part, the new Determination’’). See also Memorandum to the File,
Department of Commerce determinations made under section 129 from Irene Gorelik, Senior Analyst, Office V, re:
of the URAA.4 Pursuant to section ‘‘Preliminary Determination Under Section 129 of
(‘‘Department’’) issued its final the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Antidumping
determination under a section 129 129(c) of the URAA, the new Measures on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
proceeding regarding the fourth determinations shall apply with respect from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
administrative review of the to unliquidated entries of the subject (‘‘Vietnam’’)’’ (‘‘MPG 129 Prelim Memo’’), dated
merchandise that are entered, or May 20, 2016.
antidumping duty order on certain 9 For purposes of this proceeding, the ‘‘Minh Phu
frozen warmwater shrimp from the withdrawn from warehouse, for Group’’ includes the following companies: (1) Minh
Socialist Republic of Vietnam consumption on or after the date on Phu Seafood Export Import Corporation (and
(‘‘Vietnam’’) with respect to the Minh which the USTR directs the Department affiliates Minh Qui Seafood Co., Ltd. and Minh Phat
to implement the new determinations.5 Seafood Co., Ltd.), (2) Minh Phu Seafood Corp., (3)
Phu Group. On July 18, 2016, the U.S. Minh Phu Seafood Corporation, (4) Minh Phu
Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) This determination may be subject to Seafood Pte, (5) Minh Qui Seafood, (6) Minh Qui
judicial review separate and apart from Seafood Co., Ltd., (7) Minh Qui, (8) Minh Phat
instructed the Department to implement
judicial review of the Department’s Seafood Co., Ltd., (9) Minh Phat, (10) Minh Phat
the 129 Final Determination. As a result, Seafood, (11) Minh Phat Seafood Corp., (12) Minh
original determination.6
the Department is now implementing its Phu Hau Giang Seafood Joint Stock Company, (13)
determination. Background Minh Phu Hau Giang Seafood Co., Ltd., (14) Minh
Phu Hau Giang Seafood Corp., and (15) Minh Phu
DATES: Effective July 18, 2016. At the written request of USTR, the Hau Giang Seafood Processing Co., Ltd. See 129
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Department informed interested parties Final Determination.
10 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
1 Citation to ‘‘section 129’’ refers to section 129 the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results and
Enforcement and Compliance, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
of the URAA, codified at 19 U.S.C. 3538.
International Trade Administration, 2 See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(2).
Administrative Review, 75 FR 47771 (August 9,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 3 See SAA at 1025, 1027.
2010) (‘‘AR4 Final’’) and Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 4 See 19 U.S.C. 3538(b)(4).
Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 5 See 19 U.S.C. 3538(c).
Administrative Review, 75 FR 61122 (October 4,
482–6905. 6 See 19 U.S.C. 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vii). 2010) (‘‘AR4 Amended Final’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:19 Jul 21, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM 22JYN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_47895/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-22 02:38:09
Document Modified: 2016-07-22 02:38:09
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective March 23, 2015. | |
| Contact | Andrew Medley, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482- 4987. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 47754 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR