81 FR 48333 - Safety Zone; Illinois River Mile 69.3 to 69.8; Meredosia, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 142 (July 25, 2016)

Page Range		48333-48335
FR Document		2016-17240

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Illinois River from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8. This safety zone is needed to protect persons, property and infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with work being performed on new power lines across the river. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Upper Mississippi River (COTP). Deviation from the safety zone may be requested and will be considered on a case-by- case basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48333-48335]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0678]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Illinois River Mile 69.3 to 69.8; Meredosia, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
certain waters of the Illinois River from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8. This 
safety zone is needed to protect persons, property and infrastructure 
from potential damage and safety hazards associated with work being 
performed on new power lines across the river. Entry of vessels or 
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by 
the Captain of the Port, Upper Mississippi River (COTP). Deviation from 
the safety zone may be requested and will be considered on a case-by-
case basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from July 25, 2016 through August 16, 
2016. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. daily 
beginning on July 25, 2016 through August 16, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0678 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency finds good cause that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule 
because Ameren, the company performing the power line operations, 
notified the Coast Guard on July 8, 2016 of the dates for these 
operations, requiring helicopters to stretch power lines across the 
river. This notice did not allow for the full NPRM process to be 
completed. Due to the risks associated with power line work crossing 
the navigational channel, a safety zone is needed to protect persons 
and property on the waterway. It would be impracticable to publish a 
NPRM because the safety zone must be established beginning July 25, 
2016. Broadcast Notice to Mariners and information sharing with 
waterway users will update mariners of the safety zone and enforcement 
times during the operations.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Providing 30 days 
notice would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to 
protect persons and

[[Page 48334]]

property from the hazards associated with power line work crossing the 
navigable channel.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with 
using helicopters to stretch power lines across the navigational 
channel presents safety concerns for anyone within this limited area of 
the waterway. This rule provides additional safety measures, to protect 
persons and vessels, in the form of a safety zone from mile 69.3 to 
mile 69.8 on the Illinois River to protect those in the area and for 
the Coast Guard to maintain navigational safety.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone prohibiting 
access to the Illinois River from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8, extending the 
entire width of the river from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. daily, beginning on 
July 25, 2016 and scheduled to end on August 16, 2016, or until 
conditions allow for safe navigation, whichever occurs earlier. 
Deviation from the safety zone may be requested and will be considered 
on a case-by-case basis as specifically authorized by the COTP or a 
designated representative. The COTP may be contacted by telephone at 
314-269-2332 or can be reached by VHF-FM channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the limited 
location, enforcement periods and impacts on navigation. This rule 
establishes a temporary safety zone limiting access to a one-half mile 
area on the Illinois River from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8, for 12 hours 
each day for approximately 3 weeks. The impacts on navigation will be 
limited to ensure the safety of mariners and vessels during the period 
that helicopters will be pulling power lines across the navigational 
channel. Notifications of enforcement times will be communicated to the 
marine community via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. Deviation requests 
will be reviewed and considered on a case-by-case basis.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety

[[Page 48335]]

zone on the Illinois River from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8. It is 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0678 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T08-0678  Safety Zone; Illinois River 69.3 to 69.8; 
Meredosia, IL.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of 
the Illinois River mile 69.3 to 69.8, extending the entire width of the 
river.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, 
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the 
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River (COTP) in the enforcement 
of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in 
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the 
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative via VHF-FM channel 16, or through Coast Guard Sector 
Upper Mississippi River at 314-269-2332. Those in the safety zone must 
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP 
or the COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. 
until 7 p.m. daily beginning on July 25, 2016 through August 16, 2016.

    Dated: July 18, 2016.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016-17240 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

48334 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

property from the hazards associated navigation. This rule establishes a about this rule or any policy or action
with power line work crossing the temporary safety zone limiting access to of the Coast Guard.
navigable channel. a one-half mile area on the Illinois River
C. Collection of Information
from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8, for 12 hours
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule This rule will not call for a new
each day for approximately 3 weeks.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule The impacts on navigation will be collection of information under the
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The limited to ensure the safety of mariners Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
COTP has determined that potential and vessels during the period that U.S.C. 3501–3520).
hazards associated with using helicopters will be pulling power lines D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
helicopters to stretch power lines across across the navigational channel. Governments
the navigational channel presents safety Notifications of enforcement times will
concerns for anyone within this limited be communicated to the marine A rule has implications for federalism
area of the waterway. This rule provides community via Broadcast Notice to under Executive Order 13132,
additional safety measures, to protect Mariners. Deviation requests will be Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
persons and vessels, in the form of a reviewed and considered on a case-by- effect on the States, on the relationship
safety zone from mile 69.3 to mile 69.8 case basis. between the national government and
on the Illinois River to protect those in the States, or on the distribution of
the area and for the Coast Guard to B. Impact on Small Entities power and responsibilities among the
maintain navigational safety. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that Order and
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, have determined that it is consistent
and the Rule requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on with the fundamental federalism
The Coast Guard is establishing a small entities during rulemaking. The principles and preemption requirements
temporary safety zone prohibiting term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small described in Executive Order 13132.
access to the Illinois River from mile businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this rule does not have tribal
69.3 to mile 69.8, extending the entire that are independently owned and implications under Executive Order
width of the river from 7 a.m. until 7 operated and are not dominant in their 13175, Consultation and Coordination
p.m. daily, beginning on July 25, 2016 fields, and governmental jurisdictions with Indian Tribal Governments,
and scheduled to end on August 16, with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial
2016, or until conditions allow for safe The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian
navigation, whichever occurs earlier. 605(b) that this rule will not have a tribes, on the relationship between the
Deviation from the safety zone may be significant economic impact on a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
requested and will be considered on a substantial number of small entities. or on the distribution of power and
case-by-case basis as specifically responsibilities between the Federal
While some owners or operators of
authorized by the COTP or a designated Government and Indian tribes. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety
representative. The COTP may be believe this rule has implications for
zone may be small entities, for the
contacted by telephone at 314–269– federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
2332 or can be reached by VHF–FM contact the person listed in the FOR
this rule will not have a significant
channel 16. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
economic impact on any vessel owner
V. Regulatory Analyses or operator. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We developed this rule after Under section 213(a) of the Small The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
considering numerous statutes and Business Regulatory Enforcement of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Below we summarize our analyses we want to assist small entities in their discretionary regulatory actions. In
based on a number of these statutes and understanding this rule. If the rule particular, the Act addresses actions
Executive orders, and we discuss First would affect your small business, that may result in the expenditure by a
Amendment rights of protestors. organization, or governmental State, local, or tribal government, in the
jurisdiction and you have questions aggregate, or by the private sector of
A. Regulatory Planning and Review concerning its provisions or options for $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 compliance, please contact the person more in any one year. Though this rule
direct agencies to assess the costs and listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION will not result in such an expenditure,
benefits of available regulatory CONTACT section. we do discuss the effects of this rule
alternatives and, if regulation is Small businesses may send comments elsewhere in this preamble.
necessary, to select regulatory on the actions of Federal employees
approaches that maximize net benefits. who enforce, or otherwise determine F. Environment
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the compliance with, Federal regulations to We have analyzed this rule under
importance of quantifying both costs the Small Business and Agriculture Department of Homeland Security
and benefits, of reducing costs, of Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Management Directive 023–01 and
harmonizing rules, and of promoting and the Regional Small Business Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
flexibility. This rule has not been Regulatory Fairness Boards. The which guide the Coast Guard in
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

designated a ‘‘significant regulatory Ombudsman evaluates these actions complying with the National
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. annually and rates each agency’s Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed responsiveness to small business. If you U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
by the Office of Management and wish to comment on actions by determined that this action is one of a
Budget. employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– category of actions that do not
This regulatory action determination 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The individually or cumulatively have a
is based on the limited location, Coast Guard will not retaliate against significant effect on the human
enforcement periods and impacts on small entities that question or complain environment. This rule involves a safety

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 48335

zone on the Illinois River from mile 69.3 (2) To seek permission to enter, (Rehabilitation Act), as amended by the
to mile 69.8. It is categorically excluded contact the COTP or the COTP’s Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
from further review under paragraph representative via VHF–FM channel 16, Act (WIOA), the Rehabilitation Services
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant or through Coast Guard Sector Upper Administration (RSA) makes grants to
Instruction. An environmental analysis Mississippi River at 314–269–2332. public and private nonprofit agencies
checklist supporting this determination Those in the safety zone must comply and organizations, including
and a Categorical Exclusion with all lawful orders or directions institutions of higher education, to
Determination are available in the given to them by the COTP or the establish interpreter training programs
docket where indicated under COTP’s designated representative. or to provide financial assistance for
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or (d) Enforcement period. This rule will ongoing interpreter training programs to
information that may lead to the be enforced from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. train a sufficient number of qualified
discovery of a significant environmental daily beginning on July 25, 2016 interpreters throughout the country. The
impact from this rule. through August 16, 2016. grants are designed to train interpreters
Dated: July 18, 2016. to effectively interpret and transliterate
G. Protest Activities using spoken, visual, and tactile modes
M.L. Malloy,
The Coast Guard respects the First of communication; ensure the
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Amendment rights of protesters. maintenance of the interpreting skills of
Port Upper Mississippi River.
Protesters are asked to contact the qualified interpreters; and provide
[FR Doc. 2016–17240 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
person listed in the FOR FURTHER opportunities for interpreters to improve
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
INFORMATION CONTACT section to their skills in order to meet both the
coordinate protest activities so that your highest standards approved by
message can be received without certifying associations and the
jeopardizing the safety or security of DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION communication needs of individuals
people, places or vessels. who are deaf or hard of hearing and
34 CFR Chapter III individuals who are deaf-blind.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 772(f).
[Docket ID ED–2016–OSERS–0005; CFDA
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Number: 84.160C.] Applicable Program Regulations: 34
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping CFR part 396.
requirements, Security measures, Final Priority—Training of Interpreters We published a notice of proposed
Waterways. for Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard priority (NPP) for this competition in
For the reasons discussed in the of Hearing and Individuals Who Are the Federal Register on April 7, 2016
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 Deaf-Blind Program (81 FR 20268). That notice contained
CFR part 165 as follows: background information and our reasons
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and
for proposing the particular priority.
Rehabilitative Services, Department of Public Comment: In response to our
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Education.
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS invitation in the NPP, 26 parties
ACTION: Final priority. submitted comments on the proposed
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 priority. Generally, we do not address
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for
continues to read as follows: technical and other minor changes, or
Special Education and Rehabilitative
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Services announces a final priority suggested changes the law does not
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; under the Training of Interpreters for authorize us to make under the
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Individuals Who Are Deaf or Hard of applicable statutory authority. In
No. 0170.1. addition, we do not address general
Hearing and Individuals Who Are Deaf-
■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0678 to read as Blind program. The Assistant Secretary comments that raised concerns not
follows: may use this priority for competitions in directly related to the proposed priority.
fiscal year 2016 and later years. We take Analysis of Comments and Changes:
§ 165.T08–0678 Safety Zone; Illinois River An analysis of the comments and of any
69.3 to 69.8; Meredosia, IL. this action to provide training and
technical assistance to better prepare changes in the priority since publication
(a) Location. The following area is a of the NPP follows.
novice interpreters to become highly
safety zone: All waters of the Illinois
qualified nationally certified sign State-Level Certification or Licensure
River mile 69.3 to 69.8, extending the
language interpreters. Comment: A few commenters
entire width of the river.
(b) Definitions. As used in this DATES: This priority is effective August suggested broadening the proposed
section, designated representative 24, 2016. outcomes for the Experiential Learning
means a Coast Guard Patrol FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Model Demonstration Center (Center)
Commander, including a Coast Guard Kristen Rhinehart-Fernandez, U.S. beyond national certification to include
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer Department of Education, 400 Maryland State-level certification or licensure.
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Avenue SW., Room 5062, Potomac These commenters noted that, in some
Federal, State, and local officer Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC States, the State certification system is
designated by or assisting the Captain of 20202–2800. Telephone: (202) 245–6103 used to prepare interpreters for
the Port Upper Mississippi River or by email: Kristen.Rhinehart@ed.gov. advancement to national-level
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES

(COTP) in the enforcement of the safety If you use a telecommunications certification. Other States use the
zone. device for the deaf (TDD) or a text Educational Interpreter Performance
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Assessment (EIPA) and the Board for
safety zone regulations in subpart C of Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– Evaluation of Interpreters (BEI) for
this part, you may not enter the safety 8339. certification or licensure to offer
zone described in paragraph (a) of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: interpreting services within the State.
section unless authorized by the COTP Purpose of Program: Under the Finally, one commenter stated that
or the COTP’s designated representative. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 acknowledging the variability in State-

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jul 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25JYR1.SGM 25JYR1

Document Created: 2016-07-23 02:00:38
Document Modified: 2016-07-23 02:00:38

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from July 25, 2016 through August 16, 2016. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. until 7 p.m. daily beginning on July 25, 2016 through August 16, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 314-269-2332, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 48333
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 48333 - Safety Zone; Illinois River Mile 69.3 to 69.8; Meredosia, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 142 (July 25, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard