81_FR_48592 81 FR 48450 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Integrated Photonics Institute for Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

81 FR 48450 - Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Integrated Photonics Institute for Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 142 (July 25, 2016)

Page Range48450-48450
FR Document2016-17435

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 142 (Monday, July 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 48450]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Integrated Photonics Institute for 
Manufacturing Innovation Operating Under the Name of the American 
Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 16, 2016, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Integrated Photonics 
Institute for Manufacturing Innovation operating under the name of the 
American Institute for Manufacturing Integrated Photonics (``AIM 
Photonics''), has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: The Research Foundation for the State University of 
New York, acting on behalf of the State University of New York 
Polytechnic Institute, Albany, NY; The Trustees of Columbia University 
in the City of New York, New York, NY; The Regents of the University of 
California, on behalf of its Santa Barbara campus, Santa Barbara, CA; 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Arizona Board of 
Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; The Rector 
and Visitors of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; and 
SunEdison Semiconductor Limited, St. Peters, MO.
    The general area of AIM Photonics' planned activity is research, 
development and demonstration in the manufacture of integrated 
photonics. AIM Photonics seeks to (1) advance integrated photonic 
circuit manufacturing technology development while simultaneously 
providing access to state-of-the-art fabrication, packaging, and 
testing capabilities for commercial enterprises, academia and the 
government; (2) create an adaptive integrated photonic circuit 
workforce capable of meeting industry needs and thus further increasing 
domestic competitiveness; and (3) meet participating commercial, 
defense and civilian agency needs in this burgeoning technology area. 
AIM Photonics became the sixth Institute for Manufacturing Innovation. 
Its objective is to increase manufacturing in the United States.

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-17435 Filed 7-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P



                                                  48450                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 142 / Monday, July 25, 2016 / Notices

                                                  MD, have been added as parties to this                   for the State University of New York,                 ‘‘Defendants’’) alleging that ValueAct’s
                                                  venture.                                                 acting on behalf of the State University              acquisitions of voting securities of
                                                     Also, MOG Solutions SA, Maia,                         of New York Polytechnic Institute,                    Halliburton Company and Baker Hughes
                                                  PORTUGAL; and National                                   Albany, NY; The Trustees of Columbia                  Incorporated violated Section 7A of the
                                                  TeleConsultants, Glendale, CA, have                      University in the City of New York, New               Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, commonly
                                                  withdrawn as parties to this venture.                    York, NY; The Regents of the University               known as the Hart-Scott-Rodino
                                                     No other changes have been made in                    of California, on behalf of its Santa                 Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 (the
                                                  either the membership or planned                         Barbara campus, Santa Barbara, CA;                    ‘‘HSR Act’’). The proposed Final
                                                  activity of the group research project.                  Massachusetts Institute of Technology,                Judgment requires the Defendants to pay
                                                  Membership in this group research                        Cambridge, MA; Arizona Board of                       a civil penalty of $11,000,000 and
                                                  project remains open, and Advanced                       Regents on behalf of the University of                further prohibits Defendants from
                                                  Media Workflow Association, Inc.                         Arizona, Tucson, AZ; The Rector and                   engaging in conduct of the sort alleged
                                                  intends to file additional written                       Visitors of the University of Virginia,               in the Complaint, in violation of the
                                                  notifications disclosing all changes in                  Charlottesville, VA; and SunEdison                    HSR Act.
                                                  membership.                                              Semiconductor Limited, St. Peters, MO.                   Copies of the Complaint, proposed
                                                     On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media                       The general area of AIM Photonics’                  Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact
                                                  Workflow Association, Inc. filed its                     planned activity is research,                         Statement are available for inspection
                                                  original notification pursuant to section                development and demonstration in the                  on the Antitrust Division’s Web site at
                                                  6(a) of the Act. The Department of                       manufacture of integrated photonics.                  http://www.justice.gov/atr and at the
                                                  Justice published a notice in the Federal                AIM Photonics seeks to (1) advance                    Office of the Clerk of the United States
                                                  Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the                 integrated photonic circuit                           District Court for the Northern District
                                                  Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                      manufacturing technology development                  of California. Copies of these materials
                                                     The last notification was filed with                  while simultaneously providing access                 may be obtained from the Antitrust
                                                  the Department on March 23, 2016. A                      to state-of-the-art fabrication, packaging,           Division upon request and payment of
                                                  notice was published in the Federal                      and testing capabilities for commercial               the copying fee set by Department of
                                                  Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the                 enterprises, academia and the                         Justice regulations.
                                                  Act on April 18, 2016 (81 FR 22633).                     government; (2) create an adaptive                       Public comment is invited within 60
                                                                                                           integrated photonic circuit workforce                 days of the date of this notice. Such
                                                  Patricia A. Brink,
                                                                                                           capable of meeting industry needs and                 comments, including the name of the
                                                  Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
                                                                                                           thus further increasing domestic                      submitter, and responses thereto, will be
                                                  Division.
                                                                                                           competitiveness; and (3) meet                         posted on the Antitrust Division’s Web
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–17434 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                           participating commercial, defense and                 site, filed with the Court, and, under
                                                  BILLING CODE P
                                                                                                           civilian agency needs in this burgeoning              certain circumstances, published in the
                                                                                                           technology area. AIM Photonics became                 Federal Register. Comments should be
                                                                                                           the sixth Institute for Manufacturing                 directed to Kathleen S. O’Neill, Chief,
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                                                                           Innovation. Its objective is to increase              Transportation, Energy & Agriculture
                                                  Antitrust Division                                       manufacturing in the United States.                   Section, Antitrust Division, Department
                                                                                                           Patricia A. Brink,                                    of Justice, 450 Fifth Street NW., Suite
                                                  Notice Pursuant to the National                                                                                8000, Washington, DC 20530
                                                                                                           Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
                                                  Cooperative Research and Production                      Division.                                             (telephone: 202–307–2931).
                                                  Act of 1993—Integrated Photonics
                                                                                                           [FR Doc. 2016–17435 Filed 7–22–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                 /s/ lllllllllllllllll
                                                  Institute for Manufacturing Innovation
                                                  Operating Under the Name of the                          BILLING CODE P                                        Patricia A. Brink,
                                                  American Institute for Manufacturing                                                                           Director of Civil Enforcement.
                                                  Integrated Photonics                                     DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                 Kathleen S. O’Neill (PA Bar No. 82785)
                                                                                                                                                                 Joseph Chandra Mazumdar (WI Bar No.
                                                     Notice is hereby given that, on June                                                                          1030967)
                                                  16, 2016, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the                Antitrust Division
                                                                                                                                                                 Brian E. Hanna (VA Bar No. 80439)
                                                  National Cooperative Research and                        United States v. VA Partners I, LLC,                  Robert A. Lepore (AZ Bar No. 028137)
                                                  Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301                   ValueAct Capital Master Fund, LP, and                 Tai Milder (CABN 267070)
                                                  et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Integrated                    ValueAct Co-Invest International, LP;                 United States Department of Justice,
                                                  Photonics Institute for Manufacturing                    Proposed Final Judgment and                             Antitrust Division
                                                  Innovation operating under the name of                   Competitive Impact Statement                          450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 8000
                                                  the American Institute for                                                                                     Washington, DC 20530
                                                  Manufacturing Integrated Photonics                          Notice is hereby given pursuant to the             Telephone: (202) 307–2931
                                                  (‘‘AIM Photonics’’), has filed written                   Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,               Fax: (202) 307–2874
                                                  notifications simultaneously with the                    15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed                  Email: kathleen.oneill@usdoj.gov
                                                  Attorney General and the Federal Trade                   Final Judgment, Stipulation, and                      Brian J. Stretch (CABN 163973)
                                                  Commission disclosing (1) the identities                 Competitive Impact Statement have                     United States Attorney
                                                  of the parties to the venture and (2) the                been filed with the United States                     [Additional counsel listed on signature
                                                  nature and objectives of the venture.                    District Court for the Northern District                page]
                                                  The notifications were filed for the                     of California in United States of
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of
                                                  purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions                 America v. VA Partners I, LLC, et al.,                  America
                                                  limiting the recovery of antitrust                       Civil Action No. 16-cv-01672. On April
                                                  plaintiffs to actual damages under                       4, 2016, the United States filed a                    United States District Court for the
                                                  specified circumstances.                                 Complaint against VA Partners I, LLC,                 Northern District of California San
                                                     Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,                  ValueAct Capital Master Fund, L.P. and                Francisco Division
                                                  the identities of the parties to the                     ValueAct Co-Invest International, L.P.                  United States of America, Plaintiff, v. VA
                                                  venture are: The Research Foundation                     (collectively ‘‘ValueAct’’ or                         Partners I, LLC, Valueact Capital Master



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   18:27 Jul 22, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00076   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25JYN1.SGM   25JYN1



Document Created: 2016-07-23 02:00:45
Document Modified: 2016-07-23 02:00:45
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 48450 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR