81_FR_49409 81 FR 49265 - Certain Intermediate Bulk Containers; Institution of Investigation

81 FR 49265 - Certain Intermediate Bulk Containers; Institution of Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 144 (July 27, 2016)

Page Range49265-49266
FR Document2016-17745

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 22, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sch[uuml]tz Container Systems Inc. of North Branch, New Jersey. The complaint was supplemented on June 29 and July 7, 2016. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States or sale of certain composite intermediate bulk containers by reason of infringement of certain trade dress, the threat or effect of which is to substantially destroy or injure a domestic industry. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 144 (Wednesday, July 27, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49265-49266]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1014]


Certain Intermediate Bulk Containers; Institution of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on June 22, 2016, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Sch[uuml]tz Container Systems Inc. of North Branch, New Jersey. The 
complaint was supplemented on June 29 and July 7, 2016. The complaint, 
as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States or sale of certain composite 
intermediate bulk containers by reason of infringement of certain trade 
dress, the threat or effect of which is to substantially destroy or 
injure a domestic industry.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and a cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on July 21, 2016, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States or sale of certain composite 
intermediate bulk containers, the threat or effect of which is to 
substantially destroy or injure a domestic industry;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is: Sch[uuml]tz Container Systems Inc., 200 
Aspen Hill Road, North Branch, NJ 08876-5950.
    (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is 
to be served: Zhenjiang Runzhou Jinshan Packaging Factory, Road Dantu 
City Industrial Park, Hengshun Zhenjiang, China.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the

[[Page 49266]]

notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to 
the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted 
unless good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2016).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 22, 2016.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-17745 Filed 7-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 27, 2016 / Notices                                             49265

                                                Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and                      of 100 percent of the entered value of                contacting the Commission’s TDD
                                                Trademark Office (‘‘PTAB’’) on April 14,                 excluded products imported during the                 terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
                                                2016, finding certain claims of the ’934                 period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C.              with mobility impairments who will
                                                patent unpatentable, on the                              1337(j)). The Commission’s orders and                 need special assistance in gaining access
                                                Commission’s final determination. 81                     opinion were delivered to the President               to the Commission should contact the
                                                FR 23749–50 (Apr. 22, 2016). On April                    and to the United States Trade                        Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
                                                26, 2016, the parties filed initial written              Representative on the day of their                    2000. General information concerning
                                                submissions addressing the                               issuance.                                             the Commission may also be obtained
                                                Commission’s question. On May 3,                            The authority for the Commission’s                 by accessing its internet server at http://
                                                2016, the parties filed response briefs.                 determination is contained in section                 www.usitc.gov. The public record for
                                                   Having examined the record of this                    337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as                     this investigation may be viewed on the
                                                investigation, including the final ID and                amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part                 Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
                                                the parties’ submissions, the                            210 of the Commission’s Rules of                      at http://edis.usitc.gov.
                                                Commission has determined that RealD                     Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
                                                has proven a violation of section 337                    210).                                                 Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
                                                based on infringement of claims 1–3, 9–                                                                        U.S. International Trade Commission,
                                                                                                           By order of the Commission.
                                                11, 13, 15, 17–19, and 21 of the ’455                                                                          telephone (202) 205–2560.
                                                                                                           Issued: July 21, 2016.
                                                patent; claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 11, and 12 of
                                                                                                         Lisa R. Barton,                                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                the ’296 patent; and claims 1, 6, and 11
                                                of the ’934 patent. The Commission has                   Secretary to the Commission.                             Scope of Investigation: Having
                                                determined to modify the ALJ’s                           [FR Doc. 2016–17711 Filed 7–26–16; 8:45 am]           considered the complaint, the U.S.
                                                construction of the ‘‘uniformly                          BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                                                                               International Trade Commission, on
                                                modulate’’ limitation recited in claims 1                                                                      July 21, 2016, ordered that—
                                                and 17 of the ’455 patent. Under the                                                                              (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
                                                modified construction, the Commission                    INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                   section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                has determined that RealD has proven                     COMMISSION                                            amended, an investigation be instituted
                                                that the accused MasterImage Horizon                                                                           to determine whether there is a
                                                                                                         [Investigation No. 337–TA–1014]                       violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of
                                                3D, 3D S, M, Rv1, and Rv2 products
                                                infringe the asserted claims of the ’455                                                                       section 337 in the importation into the
                                                                                                         Certain Intermediate Bulk Containers;
                                                patent and that the technical prong of                                                                         United States or sale of certain
                                                                                                         Institution of Investigation
                                                the domestic industry requirement is                                                                           composite intermediate bulk containers,
                                                satisfied with respect to that patent. The               AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                      the threat or effect of which is to
                                                Commission has determined that the                       Commission.                                           substantially destroy or injure a
                                                asserted claims of the ’455 patent are                   ACTION: Notice.                                       domestic industry;
                                                not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(e),                                                                               (2) For the purpose of the
                                                                                                         SUMMARY:   Notice is hereby given that a              investigation so instituted, the following
                                                102(g), 103, and 112, ¶¶ 1 and 2. The
                                                Commission has determined that the                       complaint was filed with the U.S.                     are hereby named as parties upon which
                                                asserted claims of the ’296 patent are                   International Trade Commission on June                this notice of investigation shall be
                                                not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 116 for                      22, 2016, under section 337 of the Tariff             served:
                                                improper inventorship. The                               Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.                       (a) The complainant is: Schütz
                                                Commission has also determined that                      1337, on behalf of Schütz Container                  Container Systems Inc., 200 Aspen Hill
                                                the asserted claims of the ’934 patent are               Systems Inc. of North Branch, New                     Road, North Branch, NJ 08876–5950.
                                                not invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102(g) and                   Jersey. The complaint was                                (b) The respondent is the following
                                                103.                                                     supplemented on June 29 and July 7,                   entity alleged to be in violation of
                                                   The Commission has determined the                     2016. The complaint, as supplemented,                 section 337, and is the party upon
                                                appropriate remedy is a limited                          alleges violations of section 337 based               which the complaint is to be served:
                                                exclusion order prohibiting the                          upon the importation into the United                  Zhenjiang Runzhou Jinshan Packaging
                                                importation of certain three-                            States or sale of certain composite                   Factory, Road Dantu City Industrial
                                                dimensional cinema systems, and                          intermediate bulk containers by reason                Park, Hengshun Zhenjiang, China.
                                                components thereof, that infringe the                    of infringement of certain trade dress,                  (c) The Office of Unfair Import
                                                asserted claims of the ’455, ’296, and                   the threat or effect of which is to                   Investigations, U.S. International Trade
                                                ’934 patents and cease and desist orders                 substantially destroy or injure a                     Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
                                                directed against MasterImage. The                        domestic industry.                                    401, Washington, DC 20436; and
                                                Commission has determined the public                        The complainant requests that the                     (3) For the investigation so instituted,
                                                interest factors enumerated in section                   Commission institute an investigation                 the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
                                                337(d)(1) and (f)(1) do not preclude                     and, after the investigation, issue a                 U.S. International Trade Commission,
                                                issuance of the limited exclusion order                  limited exclusion order and a cease and               shall designate the presiding
                                                or cease and desist orders.                              desist order.                                         Administrative Law Judge.
                                                   In view of the PTAB’s Final Written                   ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for                     Responses to the complaint and the
                                                Decision finding certain claims of the                   any confidential information contained                notice of investigation must be
                                                ’934 patent unpatentable, the                            therein, is available for inspection                  submitted by the named respondent in
                                                Commission has determined to suspend                     during official business hours (8:45 a.m.             accordance with section 210.13 of the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                the enforcement of the limited exclusion                 to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the                    Commission’s Rules of Practice and
                                                order and cease and desist orders as to                  Secretary, U.S. International Trade                   Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
                                                claims 1, 6, and 11 of the ’934 patent                   Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room                    19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
                                                pending final resolution of the PTAB’s                   112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone                  responses will be considered by the
                                                Final Written Decision. See 35 U.S.C.                    (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired                      Commission if received not later than 20
                                                318(b). The Commission has also                          individuals are advised that information              days after the date of service by the
                                                determined to set a bond in the amount                   on this matter can be obtained by                     Commission of the complaint and the


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:01 Jul 26, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00058   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1


                                                49266                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 27, 2016 / Notices

                                                notice of investigation. Extensions of                   of any applications on two grounds. GX                 requested a hearing nor submitted a
                                                time for submitting responses to the                     1, at 1.                                               written statement in lieu of hearing. 21
                                                complaint and the notice of                                 First, the Show Cause Order alleged                 CFR 1301.43(b) & (c). Accordingly, I
                                                investigation will not be granted unless                 that effective January 27, 2015, the                   find that Registrant has waived his right
                                                good cause therefor is shown.                            Tennessee Nursing Board had                            to a hearing or to submit a written
                                                   Failure of the respondent to file a                   summarily suspended Registrant’s nurse                 statement and issue this Decision and
                                                timely response to each allegation in the                practitioner license. Id. at 2. The Order              Order based on the evidence submitted
                                                complaint and in this notice may be                      thus alleged that Registrant is currently              by the Government. Id. § 1301.43(d) &
                                                deemed to constitute a waiver of the                     without authority to dispense controlled               (e). I make the following findings.
                                                right to appear and contest the                          substances in the State in which he is
                                                allegations of the complaint and this                    registered with the Agency and                         Findings
                                                notice, and to authorize the                             therefore, his registration is subject to                 Registrant is the holder of DEA
                                                administrative law judge and the                         revocation. Id. (citing 21 U.S.C. 802(21),             Certificate of Registration MP3330545,
                                                Commission, without further notice to                    823(f), 824(a)(3)).                                    pursuant to which he is authorized to
                                                the respondent, to find the facts to be as                  Second, the Show Cause Order                        dispense controlled substances in
                                                alleged in the complaint and this notice                 alleged that Registrant materially                     schedules II through V, as a mid-level
                                                and to enter an initial determination                    falsified his October 7, 2014 application              practitioner, at the registered address of
                                                and a final determination containing                     for the above registration. Id. (citing 21             Hormone Replacement Specialists, 5550
                                                such findings, and may result in the                     U.S.C. 824(a)(1)). More specifically, the              Highway 153, Suite 103, Hixson,
                                                issuance of an exclusion order or a cease                Show Cause Order alleged that on                       Tennessee. GX 7, at 1. Registrant
                                                and desist order or both directed against                February 17, 2014, Registrant was                      renewed this registration on October 7,
                                                the respondent.                                          arrested by local authorities and charged              2014, at which time he was required to
                                                  Authority: The authority for institution of            with the ‘‘unlawful possession of                      answer the following question: ‘‘Has the
                                                this investigation is contained in section 337           marijuana.’’ Id. The Order then alleged                applicant ever been convicted of a crime
                                                of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and               that the charge was still pending at the               in connection with controlled
                                                in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules              time Registrant submitted his renewal                  substance(s) under state or federal law,
                                                of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10                 application, and that ‘‘[o]n this
                                                (2016).
                                                                                                                                                                or been excluded or directed to be
                                                                                                         application, [he] did not answer ‘yes’ to              excluded from participation in a
                                                  By order of the Commission.                            the . . . liability question: ‘Has the                 medicare or state health care program,
                                                  Issued: July 22, 2016.                                 applicant ever been convicted of a crime               or any [sic] such action pending?’’ GX
                                                Lisa R. Barton,                                          in connection with controlled                          6. Registrant entered ‘‘N’’ for no. Id.
                                                Secretary to the Commission.                             substance(s) under state or federal law,
                                                                                                         or is any action pending?’ ’’ Id. The                     On February 17, 2014, Registrant was
                                                [FR Doc. 2016–17745 Filed 7–26–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                         Government thus alleged that Registrant                arrested by a member of the Sequatchie
                                                BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
                                                                                                         violated 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(1).2                         County Sheriff’s Department and
                                                                                                            The Show Cause Order also notified                  charged with felony possession of
                                                                                                         Registrant of his right to request a                   marijuana, an offense under Tenn. Code
                                                DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE                                    hearing on the allegations or to submit                Ann. § 39–17–415. GX 5, at 1, 3, 6.
                                                                                                         a written statement while waiving his                  According to a March 31, 2015 letter
                                                Drug Enforcement Administration                          right to a hearing, the procedure for                  from the Clerk of the General Sessions
                                                                                                         electing either option, and the                        Court of Sequatchie County, criminal
                                                Geoffrey D. Peterson, N.P.; Decision                                                                            charges were pending against Registrant
                                                and Order                                                consequence of failing to elect either
                                                                                                         option. Id. at 2–3 (citing 21 CFR                      ‘‘as of October 31, 2014.’’ GX 8. The
                                                  On April 14, 2015, the Deputy                          1301.43, 1301.46). On April 23, 2015,                  Clerk’s letter further states that the
                                                Assistant Administrator, Office of                       the Show Cause Order was personally                    ‘‘[c]harges were expunged on 11/21/
                                                Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement                      served on Registrant by a DEA Diversion                2014.’’ Id.
                                                Administration, issued an Order to                       Investigator. GX 3.                                       Registrant was also previously
                                                Show Cause to Geoffrey D. Peterson,                         On April 7, 2016, the Government                    licensed by the Tennessee Board of
                                                N.P. (hereinafter, Registrant), of Hixson,               forwarded a Request for Final Agency                   Nursing (Board) as an advanced practice
                                                Tennessee. The Show Cause Order                          Action. Therein, the Government                        nurse (APN) and held a Certificate of
                                                proposed the revocation of Registrant’s                  represented that neither Registrant ‘‘nor              Fitness to prescribe. GX 4, at 2.
                                                DEA Certificate of Registration                          anyone representing him has requested                  However, on January 27, 2015, the
                                                MP3330545,1 pursuant to which he is                      a hearing or sent any other                            Board ordered the summary suspension
                                                authorized to dispense controlled                        correspondence to DEA.’’ Req. for Final                of Registrant’s advance practice nurse
                                                substances in schedules II through V, as                 Agency Action, at 7. Based on the                      license and Certificate of Fitness to
                                                a mid-level practitioner, and the denial                 Government’s representation, I find that               Prescribe. Id. at 7. The Board based its
                                                                                                         30 days have now passed since the                      order on findings which included that
                                                   1 While Government also alleges that Registrant
                                                                                                         Show Cause Order was served on                         on December 19, 2014, a search warrant
                                                holds an additional registration (MP1971731) and                                                                was executed at Registrant’s residence
                                                seeks its revocation as well, in its Request for Final
                                                                                                         Registrant and that he has neither
                                                Agency Action, the Government acknowledges that                                                                 during which the search team found
                                                this registration had expired shortly before the            2 While the Government contends that Registrant     ‘‘prefilled syringes of morphine, vials of
                                                issuance of the Show Cause Order. To ensure that         violated section 824(a)(1), this provision is simply   morphine, shopping bags full of used
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                Registrant did not file a renewal application for this   a grant of authority to the Attorney General to
                                                registration, I have taken official notice of            revoke or suspend a registration and does not itself
                                                                                                                                                                needles, a bottle of prednisone, and a
                                                Registrant’s registration record with the Agency.        impose a substantive rule of conduct. Rather, the      bottle of animal morphine,’’ and that
                                                See 5 U.S.C. 556(e). That record shows that              rule of conduct is imposed by 21 U.S.C. 843(a)(4)(A)   ‘‘[t]he syringes of morphine are of
                                                Registrant allowed this registration to expire and       (‘‘It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or    unknown origin with no identifying
                                                did not file an application to renew it whether          intentionally . . . to furnish false or fraudulent
                                                timely or not. Accordingly, I find that this             material information in, or omit any material
                                                                                                                                                                prescription information.’’ Id. at 3. The
                                                proceeding is moot insofar as it seeks the revocation    information from, any application . . . filed under    search team also found a pipe
                                                of this registration.                                    this subchapter[.]’’).                                 containing marijuana residue. Id.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:01 Jul 26, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00059   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM   27JYN1



Document Created: 2018-02-08 08:02:51
Document Modified: 2018-02-08 08:02:51
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactThe Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-2560.
FR Citation81 FR 49265 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR