81 FR 50362 - Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, Permit Programs
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 147 (August 1, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 147 (August 1, 2016)
| Page Range | 50362-50365 | |
| FR Document | 2016-18009 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 50362-50365] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-18009] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0119; FRL-9948-26-Region 9] Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution Control District, Permit Programs AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Modoc County Air Pollution Control District (MCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern MCAPCD's administrative and procedural requirements to obtain preconstruction permits that regulate emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are approving local rules under the CAA. DATES: This rule is effective on September 30, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09- OAR-2016-0119 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments [[Page 50363]] cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ya-Ting (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3328, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these rules? C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Final Action III. Incorporation by Reference IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State's Submittal A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules under MCAPCD Regulation II, ``Permit System'' addressed by this action with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Table 1--Submitted Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adoption or Rule No. Rule title amendment date Submittal date ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.3........................................ Transfers.......................... 1/15/1989 12/31/1990 2.5........................................ Expiration of Applications......... 1/15/1989 12/31/1990 2.7........................................ Conditional Approval............... 1/15/1989 12/31/1990 2.10....................................... Further Information................ 1/15/1989 12/31/1990 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On February 28, 1991, the EPA determined that the submittal for the MCAPCD rules listed in Table 1 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. B. Are there other versions of these rules? EPA approved the rules listed in Table 2 into the MCAPCD portion of the California SIP on the dates listed. When the rules listed in Table 1 are approved by EPA, those rules will take the place of the existing SIP approved rules listed in Table 2. Table 2--SIP Approved Rules ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Rule No. Rule title SIP approval Register date citation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.3........................................ Transfer........................... 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 2.5........................................ Cancellation of Applications....... 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 2.7 *...................................... Provision of Sampling and Testing 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 Facilities. 2.9 *...................................... Conditional Approval............... 09/22/1972 37 FR 19812 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Note: SIP approved Rule 2.7--Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities will be replaced by newly submitted Rule 2.10 Further Information. SIP approved Rule 2.9--Conditional Approval will be replaced by submitted Rule 2.7--Conditional Approval. C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that will assure attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Quality Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These rules were developed as part of the local agency's general programmatic requirement to implement the requirement commonly referred to as the minor or general New Source Review (NSR) program. The revisions contained in the submitted rules listed in Table 1 are mostly administrative in nature. Rule 2.3 prohibits the transfer of an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate without written approval. Rule 2.5 provides the timeline for an Authority to Construct or an application for a Permit to Operate to expire and/or be extended. Rule 2.7 is renumbered from Rule 2.9 and provides additional enforceability by clarifying that equipment cannot be operated contrary to permit conditions specified in the permit. Rule 2.10 is a new rule that allows MCAPCD to require data, sampling, testing, and monitoring to determine a stationary source's emissions. There are no substantive relaxations to these rules. The TSD, which is available in the docket for today's rulemaking, has more information about these rules. II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules? SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193). The submitted rules are revisions [[Page 50364]] to existing SIP approved general NSR permit program requirements under 40 CFR 51.160-51.164. The revisions are primarily administrative in nature (reformatting, providing additional clarity and enforceability). B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. These changes are mostly administrative in nature and their approval will not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other CAA application requirement. The TSD, which is available in the docket for today's rulemaking, has more information on our evaluation. C. Public Comment and Final Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by August 31, 2016, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective without further notice on September 30, 2016. This action will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MCAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX (AIR-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 30, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. [[Page 50365]] Dated: June 15, 2016. Alexis Strauss, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(6)(xi)(D), and (c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (6) * * * (xi) * * * (D) Previously approved September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8), Rule 2.3 ``Transfer,'' Rule 2.5 ``Cancellation of Application,'' Rule 2.7 ``Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities,'' and Rule 2.9 ``Conditional Approval''. * * * * * (182) * * * (i) * * * (F) * * * (5) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.3 ``Transfers'' amended on January 15, 1989. (6) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.5 ``Expiration of Applications'' amended on January 15, 1989. (7) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.7 ``Conditional Approval'' amended on January 15, 1989. (8) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.10 ``Further Information'' amended on January 15, 1989. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-18009 Filed 7-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![50362 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 15, 2016. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Transportation Conformity Budgets’’ at
Shawn M. Garvin, the end of the table to read as follows:
Regional Administrator, Region III. Subpart V—Maryland
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: § 52.1070 Identification of plan.
■ 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph * * * * *
PART 52—APPROVAL AND (e) is amended by adding the entries
‘‘Serious Area Reasonable Further (e) * * *
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Progress (RFP) Plan and 2012 RFP
Contingency Measures,’’ ‘‘Updates to
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 the 2002 Base Year Inventory for VOC,
continues to read as follows: NOX and CO,’’ and ‘‘2012
Name of non-regulatory State submittal Additional
Applicable geographic area EPA approval date
SIP revision date explanation
* * * * * * *
Serious Area Reasonable Further Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone se- July 22, 2013 .... 8/1/2016 [Insert Federal Reg- § 52.1076(cc)
Progress (RFP) Plan and 2012 rious nonattainment area. ister citation].
RFP Contingency Measures.
Updates to the 2002 Base Year Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone se- July 22, 2013 .... 8/1/2016 [Insert Federal Reg- § 52.1075(p)
Inventory for VOC, NOX and rious nonattainment area. ister citation].
CO.
2012 Transportation Conformity Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone se- July 22, 2013 .... 8/1/2016 [Insert Federal Reg- § 52.1076(dd)
Budgets. rious nonattainment area. ister citation].
■ 3. Section 52.1075 is amended by inventories in the Area for the following 2012 RFP milestones, updates to the
adding paragraph (p) to read as follows: pollutants: Volatile organic compounds 2008 RFP milestones previously
(VOC), carbon monoxide (CO) and approved by EPA under paragraph (q) of
§ 52.1075 Base year emissions inventory. nitrogen oxides (NOX). this section, and contingency measures
* * * * * ■ 4. Section 52.1076 is amended by for failure to meet 2012 RFP, submitted
(p) EPA approves, as a revision to the adding paragraphs (cc) and (dd) to read by the Secretary of the Maryland
Maryland State Implementation Plan, as follows: Department of the Environment on July
updates to the 2002 base year emissions 22, 2013.
inventories previously approved under § 52.1076 52.1076 Control strategy plans (dd) EPA approves the following 2012
paragraph (i) of this section for the for attainment and rate-of-progress: Ozone. RFP motor vehicle emissions budgets
Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious * * * * * (MVEBs) for the Baltimore 1997 8-hour
nonattainment area (Area) submitted by (cc) EPA approves revisions to the ozone serious nonattainment area, in
the Secretary of the Maryland Maryland State Implementation Plan tons per day (tpd) of volatile organic
Department of the Environment on July consisting of the serious area reasonable compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides
22, 2013. This submittal consists of further progress (RFP) plan for the (NOX), submitted by the Secretary of the
updated 2002 base year point, area, non- Baltimore 1997 8-hour ozone serious Maryland Department of the
road mobile, and on-road mobile source nonattainment area, including 2011 and Environment on July 22, 2013:
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EMISSIONS BUDGETS FOR THE BALTIMORE AREA
VOC NOX Effective date of adequacy determination or
Type of control strategy SIP Year (tpd) (tpd) SIP approval
Rate of Progress Plan .................................... 2012 40.2 93.5 March 8, 2016 (81 FR 8711), published Feb-
ruary 22, 2016.
[FR Doc. 2016–17781 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am] ACTION: Direct final rule. DATES: This rule is effective on
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P September 30, 2016 without further
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection notice, unless the EPA receives adverse
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final comments by August 31, 2016. If we
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION action to approve revisions to the receive such comments, we will publish
AGENCY Modoc County Air Pollution Control a timely withdrawal in the Federal
District (MCAPCD) portion of the Register to notify the public that this
40 CFR Part 52 direct final rule will not take effect.
California State Implementation Plan
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0119; FRL–9948–26– (SIP). These revisions concern ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Region 9] MCAPCD’s administrative and identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
procedural requirements to obtain OAR–2016–0119 at http://
Approval of California Air Plan
preconstruction permits that regulate www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Revisions, Modoc County Air Pollution
emission sources under the Clean Air R9airpermits@epa.gov. For comments
Control District, Permit Programs
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Act). We are approving local rules under online instructions for submitting
Agency (EPA). the CAA. comments. Once submitted, comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jul 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_50509/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 50365
Dated: June 15, 2016. ACTION: Final rule. rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
Alexis Strauss, 804.
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
SUMMARY: NASA is issuing a final rule
amending the NASA Federal IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(NFS) to clarify NASA’s award fee A final regulatory flexibility analysis
follows: has been prepared consistent with the
process by incorporating terms used in
PART 52—APPROVAL AND award fee contracting; guidance relative Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
PROMULGATION OF to final award fee evaluations; release of et seq., and is summarized as follows:
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS source selection information; and the NASA is amending the NFS to clarify
calculation of the provisional award fee award fee process by incorporating
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 payment percentage in NASA end-item terms used in award fee contracting;
continues to read as follows: award fee contracts. guidance relative to final award fee
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. DATES: Effective: August 31, 2016. evaluations; release of source selection
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. information; and the calculation of the
Subpart F—California William Roets, telephone 202–358– provisional award fee payment
4483. percentage in NASA end-item award fee
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(6)(xi)(D), and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: contracts.
(c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8) to read I. Background No changes were made to the
as follows: proposed rule in developing the final
NASA published a proposed rule in
rule. No comments from small entities
§ 52.220 Identification of plan. the Federal Register at 81 FR 23667 on
were submitted in reference to the
* * * * * April 22, 2016, to revise NFS 1816.4 and
1852.216–77 to clarify NASA’s award Regulatory Flexibility Act request in the
(c) * * *
(6) * * * fee evaluation and payment processes. proposed rule. Therefore, the proposed
(xi) * * * One public comment was received in rule has been adopted as final.
(D) Previously approved September response to the proposed rule. NASA does not expect this final rule
22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) of this to have a significant economic impact
section and now deleted with II. Discussion and Analysis
on a substantial number of small entities
replacement in paragraph NASA reviewed the public comment within the meaning of the Regulatory
(c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8), Rule 2.3 in the development of the final rule. A Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
‘‘Transfer,’’ Rule 2.5 ‘‘Cancellation of discussion of the comment and the because the guidance largely clarifies
Application,’’ Rule 2.7 ‘‘Provision of changes made to the rule as a result of aspects relative to the award fee
Sampling and Testing Facilities,’’ and this comment is provided, as follows: evaluation and payment process
Rule 2.9 ‘‘Conditional Approval’’.
A. Changes resulting in a more consistent use and
* * * * * administration of award fees within
(182) * * * No change was made in the final rule
(i) * * * in response to the public comment NASA providing all entities both large
(F) * * * received. and small a positive benefit. An analysis
(5) Regulation II, ‘‘Permit System,’’ of data in the Federal Procurement Data
B. Analysis of Public Comment System (FPDS) revealed that award fee
Rule 2.3 ‘‘Transfers’’ amended on
January 15, 1989. Comment: Respondent stated that contracts are primarily awarded to large
(6) Regulation II, ‘‘Permit System,’’ they do not support this rule. businesses with large dollar contracts.
Rule 2.5 ‘‘Expiration of Applications’’ Response: The respondent did not An analysis of FPDS data over the past
amended on January 15, 1989. identify any specific areas of concern. three years (FY2013 through FY2015)
(7) Regulation II, ‘‘Permit System,’’ Accordingly, this rule provides needed showed an average of 157 award fee
Rule 2.7 ‘‘Conditional Approval’’ clarification to NASA’s award fee contracts were awarded at NASA per
amended on January 15, 1989. processes to enhance the efficient year, of which 33 (approximately 20%)
(8) Regulation II, ‘‘Permit System,’’ administration of award fee incentives. were awarded to small businesses.
Rule 2.10 ‘‘Further Information’’
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Thus, the application of the award fee
amended on January 15, 1989.
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and revisions contained in this rule do not
* * * * * apply to a substantial number of small
[FR Doc. 2016–18009 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am] 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory entities.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
alternatives and, if regulation is The rule imposes no reporting,
necessary, to select regulatory recordkeeping, or other information
approaches that maximize net benefits collection requirements. There are no
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
(including potential economic, significant alternatives that could
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
environmental, public health and safety further minimize the already minimal
48 CFR Parts 1816 and 1852 effects, distributive impacts, and impact on businesses, small or large.
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
RIN 2700–AE31 importance of quantifying both costs V. Paperwork Reduction Act
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
NASA Federal Acquisition Regulation The rule does not contain any
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
Supplement: Clarification of Award Fee information collection requirements that
flexibility. This is not a significant
Evaluations and Payments (NFS Case require the approval of the Office of
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
2016–N008) Management and Budget under the
subject to review under section 6(b) of
AGENCY:National Aeronautics and E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Space Administration. Review, dated September 30, 1993. This chapter 35).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Jul 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM 01AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_50509/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-30 06:25:57
Document Modified: 2016-07-30 06:25:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on September 30, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2016. If we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Ya-Ting (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-3328, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 50362 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR