81 FR 50580 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule to Amend the Fees Schedule
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 147 (August 1, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 147 (August 1, 2016)
| Page Range | 50580-50582 | |
| FR Document | 2016-18057 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 50580-50582] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-18057] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-78421; File No. SR-C2-2016-013] Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule to Amend the Fees Schedule July 26, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on July 14, 2016, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\ Specifically, the [[Page 50581]] Exchange proposes to increase Maker rebates for simple orders in all equity, multiply-listed index (except Russell 2000 Index (``RUT'')), ETF and ETN options classes. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to adopt the following rates. Listed rates are per contract. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee change on July 1, 2016 (SR-C2-2016-011). On July 14, 2016, the Exchange withdrew that filing and replaced it with this filing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Penny Classes Non-Penny --------------------------------------------------------------- Current Proposed Current Proposed ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Customer................................. (.37) (.42) (.75) (.80) C2 Market-Maker................................. (.40) (.45) (.68) (.73) All Other Origins (Professional Customer, Firm, (.35) (.40) (.60) (.65) Broker/Dealer, non-C2 Market-Maker, JBO, etc.). Trades on the Open.............................. (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the increased amounts will incentivize more volume to the Exchange. Specifically, the proposed increased rebates are intended to encourage C2 Market-Makers to quote more often and attract market participants to send orders to the Exchange, which will then incent Takers to trade with those orders and quotes. The Exchange notes that the proposed Maker rebate amounts are similar to and in line with the amounts currently assessed for simple, non-complex orders in equity, multiply-listed index, ETF and ETN options classes at other Exchanges.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See e.g., Bats BZX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, Transaction Fees, which lists, for executions in Penny Pilot securities, (1) Customer Maker rebate of $0.25 to $0.53, (2) Market- Maker Maker rebate of $0.35 to $0.42, and (3) Firm and Broker Dealer Maker rebate of $0.36 to $0.46; and for executions in non-Penny Pilot securities, (1) Customer Maker rebate of $0.85 to $1.00, (2) Market-Maker Maker rebate of $0.42 to $0.52, and (3) Firm and Broker Maker rebate of $0.36 to $0.67. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is reasonable because the proposed change provides additional rebates to Makers and is designed to attract additional volume to the Exchange, which benefits all market participants. The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide higher rebates to Public Customers as compared to other market participants (other than C2 Market-Makers for penny classes) because Public Customer order flow enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. Specifically, Public Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading opportunities, which attracts Market-Makers. An increase in the activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. Moreover, the options industry has a long history of providing preferential pricing to Public Customers. Finally, all fee and rebate amounts listed as applying to Public Customers will be applied equally to all Public Customers. The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide higher rebates to Market-Makers as compared to other market participants other than Public Customers (for non-penny options) because Market-Makers, unlike other C2 market participants, take on a number of obligations, including quoting obligations, that other market participants do not have. Further, these lower fees and higher rebates offered to Market-Makers are intended to incent Market- Makers to quote and trade more on the Exchange, thereby providing more trading opportunities for all market participants. Finally, all rebate amounts listed as applying to Market-Makers will be applied equally to all Market-Makers. The Exchange also believes it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide lower rebates to all other origins (i.e., Professional Customer, Firm, Broker/Dealer, non-C2 Market-Maker, JBO, etc.). Particularly, the Exchange notes that it believes it's equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to provide lower rebates than it does of Market-Makers, because these market participants do not have the same obligations, such as quoting, as Market-Makers do. The Exchange believes it's equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess lower rebate than it does to Public Customers, because, as described above, there is a history of providing preferential pricing to Public Customers as Public Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more trading opportunities. The Exchange notes that the proposed fee and rebate amounts listed will also be applied equally to each of these market participants (i.e., Professional Customers, Firms, Broker/Dealers, non-C2 Market-Makers, JBOs, etc. will be assessed the same amount). It should also be noted that all fee and rebate amounts described herein are intended to attract greater order flow to the Exchange, which should therefore serve to benefit all Exchange market participants. The Exchange believes it's reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to continue to assess no fees and offer no rebates for Trades on the Open because trades on the Open involve the matching of undisplayed pre-opening trading interest. As such, there is, in effect, no Maker or Taker activity occurring. Additionally, the Exchange would like to encourage users to submit pre-opening orders. [[Page 50582]] The Exchange lastly believes it's equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to assess higher rebates for non-Penny option classes than Penny option classes because Penny classes and non-Penny classes offer different pricing, liquidity, spread and trading incentives. The spreads in Penny classes are tighter than those in non-Penny classes (which trade in $0.05 increments). The wider spreads in non-Penny option classes allow for greater profit potential. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, while different rebates are assessed to different market participants in some circumstances, these different market participants have different obligations and different circumstances (as described in the ``Statutory Basis'' section above). For example, Public Customers order flow, as discussed above, enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants. There is also a history in the options markets of providing preferential treatment to Public Customers. Additionally, Market-Makers have quoting obligations that other market participants do not have. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it only applies to trading on the Exchange. Further, the proposed rebate amounts are similar to those assessed for similar orders by other exchanges,\8\ and therefore should continue to encourage competition. Should the proposed change make C2 a more attractive trading venue for market participants at other exchanges, such market participants may elect to become market participants at C2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See supra note 4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-C2-2016-013 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-013. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-013, and should be submitted on or before August 22, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\11\ Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-18057 Filed 7-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![50580 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Notices
or publicly disseminated; (d) how Exchange of any failure by the Fund to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
information regarding the Portfolio comply with the continued listing COMMISSION
Indicative Value and the Disclosed requirements, and, pursuant to its
[Release No. 34–78421; File No. SR–C2–
Portfolio is disseminated; (e) the obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the 2016–013]
requirement that Equity Trading Permit Act, the Exchange will monitor for
Holders deliver a prospectus to compliance with the continued listing Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
investors purchasing newly issued requirements.54 If the Fund is not in Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Shares prior to or concurrently with the compliance with the applicable listing Notice of Filing and Immediate
confirmation of a transaction; and (f) requirements, the Exchange will Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule to
trading information. Amend the Fees Schedule
commence delisting procedures under
(6) For initial and continued listing,
the Fund will be in compliance with NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m). July 26, 2016.
Rule 10A–3 under the Act,53 as This approval order is based on all of Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
provided by NYSE Arca Equities Rule the Exchange’s representations, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
5.3. including those set forth above, in the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
(7) The Fund may hold up to an Notice, and in Amendment No. 1 to the notice is hereby given that on July 14,
aggregate amount of 15% of its net proposed rule change. The Commission 2016, C2 Options Exchange,
assets in illiquid assets. notes that the Fund and the Shares must Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
(8) Not more than 10% of the net comply with the requirements of NYSE filed with the Securities and Exchange
assets of the Fund in the aggregate Arca Equities Rule 8.600, including Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
invested in equity securities (other than those set forth in this proposed rule proposed rule change as described in
non-exchange-traded investment change, as modified by Amendment No. Items I, II, and III below, which Items
company securities) shall consist of 1, to be listed and traded on the have been prepared by the Exchange.
equity securities whose principal Exchange on an initial and continuing The Commission is publishing this
market is not a member of the ISG or is basis. notice to solicit comments on the
a market with which the Exchange does proposed rule change from interested
not have a CSSA. Furthermore, not more For the foregoing reasons, the
persons.
than 10% of the net assets of the Fund Commission finds that the proposed
in the aggregate invested in futures rule change, as modified by Amendment I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
contracts shall consist of futures No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) Statement of the Terms of the Substance
contracts whose principal market is not of the Act 55 and the rules and of the Proposed Rule Change
a member of ISG or is a market with regulations thereunder applicable to a The Exchange proposes to amend its
which the Exchange does not have a national securities exchange. Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed
CSSA. No more than 10% of the net rule change is available on the
IV. Conclusion
assets of the Fund will be invested in Exchange’s Web site (http://
ADRs that are not exchange-listed. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the
(9) The Fund’s investments will be Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,56 Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
consistent with the Fund’s investment that the proposed rule change (SR– at the Commission’s Public Reference
objective and will not be used to NYSEArca–2016–79), as modified by Room.
produce leveraged returns. The Fund’s Amendment No. 1, be, and it hereby is,
investments will not be used to seek II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
approved. Statement of the Purpose of, and
performance that is the multiple or
inverse multiple (i.e., 2Xs and 3Xs) of For the Commission, by the Division of Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
the Index. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Change
(10) All ETFs in which the Fund authority.57 In its filing with the Commission, the
invests will be listed and traded in the Robert W. Errett, Exchange included statements
U.S. on a national securities exchange Deputy Secretary. concerning the purpose of and basis for
and the Fund will not invest in inverse [FR Doc. 2016–18052 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am] the proposed rule change and discussed
ETFs or in leveraged (e.g., 2X, –2X, 3X any comments it received on the
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
or –3X) ETFs. proposed rule change. The text of these
(11) The Fund will not invest in statements may be examined at the
54 The Commission notes that certain other
options or swaps. places specified in Item IV below. The
proposals for the listing and trading of Managed
(12) A minimum of 100,000 Shares for Fund Shares include a representation that the Exchange has prepared summaries, set
the Fund will be outstanding at the exchange will ‘‘surveil’’ for compliance with the forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
commencement of trading on the continued listing requirements. See, e.g., Securities the most significant aspects of such
Exchange. Exchange Act Release No. 77499 (April 1, 2016), 81
FR 20428 (April 7, 2016) (SR–BATS–2016–04)
statements.
The Exchange represents that all (approving a proposed rule change to list and trade
statements and representations made in A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
shares of the SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration
the filing regarding (a) the description of Total Return Tactical ETF), available at: http:// Statement of the Purpose of, and
the portfolio, (b) limitations on portfolio www.sec.gov/rules/sro/bats/2016/34-77499.pdf. In Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
holdings or reference assets, or (c) the the context of this representation, it is the Change
Commission’s view that ‘‘monitor’’ and ‘‘surveil’’
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
applicability of Exchange rules and both mean ongoing oversight of the Fund’s 1. Purpose
surveillance procedures shall constitute compliance with the continued listing
requirements. Therefore, the Commission does not
The Exchange proposes to amend its
continued listing requirements for
view ‘‘monitor’’ as a more or less stringent Fees Schedule.3 Specifically, the
listing the Shares on the Exchange. In obligation than ‘‘surveil’’ with respect to the
addition, the issuer has represented to continued listing requirements. 1 15U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
the Exchange that it will advise the 55 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 2 17CFR 240.19b–4.
56 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 3 The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee
53 See 17 CFR 240.10A–3. 57 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). change on July 1, 2016 (SR–C2–2016–011). On July
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Jul 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_50727/page/1.svg)
![50582 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 147 / Monday, August 1, 2016 / Notices
The Exchange lastly believes it’s III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
equitable and not unfairly Rule Change and Timing for Washington, DC 20549 on official
discriminatory to assess higher rebates Commission Action business days between the hours of
for non-Penny option classes than The foregoing rule change has become 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
Penny option classes because Penny effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) filing also will be available for
classes and non-Penny classes offer of the Act 9 and paragraph (f) of Rule inspection and copying at the principal
different pricing, liquidity, spread and 19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time within office of the Exchange. All comments
trading incentives. The spreads in 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule received will be posted without change;
Penny classes are tighter than those in change, the Commission summarily may the Commission does not edit personal
non-Penny classes (which trade in $0.05 temporarily suspend such rule change if identifying information from
increments). The wider spreads in non- it appears to the Commission that such submissions. You should submit only
Penny option classes allow for greater action is necessary or appropriate in the information that you wish to make
profit potential. public interest, for the protection of available publicly. All submissions
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of should refer to File Number SR–C2–
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
the purposes of the Act. If the 2016–013, and should be submitted on
Statement on Burden on Competition
Commission takes such action, the or before August 22, 2016.
C2 does not believe that the proposed Commission will institute proceedings For the Commission, by the Division of
rule change will impose any burden on to determine whether the proposed rule Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
competition that is not necessary or change should be approved or authority.11
appropriate in furtherance of the disapproved. Robert W. Errett,
purposes of the Act. The Exchange does Deputy Secretary.
not believe that the proposed rule IV. Solicitation of Comments
[FR Doc. 2016–18057 Filed 7–29–16; 8:45 am]
change will impose any burden on Interested persons are invited to
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
intramarket competition that is not submit written data, views, and
necessary or appropriate in furtherance arguments concerning the foregoing,
of the purposes of the Act because, including whether the proposed rule SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
while different rebates are assessed to change is consistent with the Act. COMMISSION
different market participants in some Comments may be submitted by any of
circumstances, these different market the following methods: [Release No.34–78419; File No. SR–Phlx–
participants have different obligations 2016–78]
Electronic Comments
and different circumstances (as
described in the ‘‘Statutory Basis’’ • Use the Commission’s Internet Self-Regulatory Organizations;
section above). For example, Public comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
Customers order flow, as discussed rules/sro.shtml); or and Immediate Effectiveness of
above, enhances liquidity on the • Send an email to rule-comments@ Proposed Rule Change To Amend Phlx
Exchange for the benefit of all market sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Rule 754 (Employees’ Discretion as to
participants. There is also a history in C2–2016–013 on the subject line. Customers’ Accounts)
the options markets of providing Paper Comments July 26, 2016.
preferential treatment to Public • Send paper comments in triplicate Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Customers. Additionally, Market- to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Makers have quoting obligations that Commission, 100 F Street NE., (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
other market participants do not have. Washington, DC 20549–1090. notice is hereby given that on July 14,
The Exchange does not believe that All submissions should refer to File 2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
the proposed change will impose any Number SR–C2–2016–013. This file ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
burden on intermarket competition that number should be included on the and Exchange Commission
is not necessary or appropriate in subject line if email is used. To help the (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
furtherance of the purposes of the Act Commission process and review your change as described in Items I, II, and
because it only applies to trading on the comments more efficiently, please use III, below, which Items have been
Exchange. Further, the proposed rebate only one method. The Commission will prepared by the Exchange. The
amounts are similar to those assessed post all comments on the Commission’s Commission is publishing this notice to
for similar orders by other exchanges,8 Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ solicit comments on the proposed rule
and therefore should continue to rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the change from interested persons.
encourage competition. Should the submission, all subsequent
proposed change make C2 a more amendments, all written statements I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
attractive trading venue for market with respect to the proposed rule Statement of the Terms of Substance of
participants at other exchanges, such change that are filed with the the Proposed Rule Change
market participants may elect to become Commission, and all written The Exchange proposes to amend
market participants at C2. communications relating to the Rule 754 of the Phlx rules. The text of
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s proposed rule change between the the proposed rule change is available on
Statement on Comments on the Commission and any person, other than the Exchange’s Web site at http://
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Rule Change Received From those that may be withheld from the nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the
Members, Participants, or Others public in accordance with the principal office of the Exchange, and at
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be the Commission’s Public Reference
The Exchange neither solicited nor available for Web site viewing and Room.
received comments on the proposed printing in the Commission’s Public
rule change. 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
8 See supra note 4. 10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Jul 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM 01AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_50727/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-07-30 06:25:58
Document Modified: 2016-07-30 06:25:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 50580 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR