81 FR 5149 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 to Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 To Adopt Generic Listing Standards for Managed Fund Shares
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 20 (February 1, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 20 (February 1, 2016)
| Page Range | 5149-5158 | |
| FR Document | 2016-01714 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 20 (Monday, February 1, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 5149-5158] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-01714] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-76974; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2015-110] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 to Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 To Adopt Generic Listing Standards for Managed Fund Shares January 26, 2016. On November 6, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt generic listing standards for Managed Fund Shares. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on November 27, 2015.\3\ On November 23, 2015, after issuance of the Notice but before its publication, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the [[Page 5150]] proposed rule change.\4\ On January 4, 2016, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\ The Commission has received one comment on the proposal.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76486 (Nov. 20, 2015), 80 FR 74169 (``Notice''). \4\ The Exchange withdrew this amendment on January 21, 2016. See infra note 10. \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76819, 81 FR 987 (Jan. 8, 2016). \7\ See letter from Rob Ivanoff to the Commission dated Nov. 22, 2015, available at: http://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2015-110/nysearca2015110.shtml. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\9\ notice is hereby given that, on January 21, 2016, the Exchange filed with the Commission Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. Amendment No. 2 replaces and supersedes the proposed rule change as originally filed. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from interested persons on Amendment No. 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 to adopt generic listing standards for Managed Fund Shares. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 to adopt generic listing standards for Managed Fund Shares. Under the Exchange's current rules, a proposed rule change must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') for the listing and trading of each new series of Managed Fund Shares. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to codify certain rules within Rule 8.600 that would generally eliminate the need for such proposed rule changes, which would create greater efficiency and promote uniform standards in the listing process.\10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The Exchange has previously filed a proposed rule change to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 to adopt generic listing standards for Managed Fund Shares. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74433 (March 4, 2015), 80 FR 12690 (March 10, 2015) (SR- NYSEArca-2015-02). On June 3, 2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75115 (June 5, 2015), 80 FR 33309 (June 11, 2015). On October 13, 2015, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76186 (October 19, 2015), 80 FR 64461 (October 23, 2015). This Amendment No. 2 to SR-NYSEArca-2015- 110 replaces SR-NYSEArca-2015-110 as originally filed and supersedes such filing in its entirety. The Exchange has withdrawn Amendment No. 1 to SR-NYSEArca-2015-110. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Background Rule 8.600 sets forth certain rules related to the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares.\11\ Under Rule 8.600(c)(1), the term ``Managed Fund Share'' means a security that: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57619 (April 4, 2008), 73 FR 19544 (April 10, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-25) (order approving NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 and listing and trading of shares of certain issues of Managed Fund Shares) (the ``Approval Order''). The Approval Order approved the rules permitting the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares, trading hours and halts, listing fees applicable to Managed Fund Shares, and the listing and trading of several individual series of Managed Fund Shares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) Represents an interest in a registered investment company (``Investment Company'') organized as an open-end management investment company or similar entity, that invests in a portfolio of securities selected by the Investment Company's investment adviser (hereafter ``Adviser'') consistent with the Investment Company's investment objectives and policies; (b) is issued in a specified aggregate minimum number in return for a deposit of a specified portfolio of securities and/or a cash amount with a value equal to the next determined net asset value; and (c) when aggregated in the same specified minimum number, may be redeemed at a holder's request, which holder will be paid a specified portfolio of securities and/or cash with a value equal to the next determined net asset value. Effectively, Managed Fund Shares are securities issued by an actively-managed open-end Investment Company (i.e., an actively-managed exchange-traded fund (``ETF'')). Because Managed Fund Shares are actively-managed, they do not seek to replicate the performance of a specified passive index of securities. Instead, they generally use an active investment strategy to seek to meet their investment objectives. In contrast, an open-end Investment Company that issues Investment Company Units (``Units''), listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign or domestic stock index, fixed income securities index or combination thereof. All Managed Fund Shares listed and/or traded pursuant to Rule 8.600 (including pursuant to unlisted trading privileges) are subject to the full panoply of Exchange rules and procedures that currently govern the trading of equity securities on the Exchange.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Approval Order, supra note 11, at 19547. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, Rule 8.600(d) currently provides for the criteria that Managed Fund Shares must satisfy for initial and continued listing on the Exchange, including, for example, that a minimum number of Managed Fund Shares are required to be outstanding at the time of commencement of trading on the Exchange. However, the current process for listing and trading new series of Managed Fund Shares on the Exchange requires that the Exchange submit a proposed rule change with the Commission. In this regard, Commentary .01 to Rule 8.600 specifies that the Exchange will file separate proposals under section 19(b) of the Act (hereafter, a ``proposed rule change'') before listing and trading of shares of an issue of Managed Fund Shares. Proposed Changes to Rule 8.600 The Exchange would amend Commentary .01 to Rule 8.600 to specify that the Exchange may approve Managed Fund Shares for listing and/or trading (including pursuant to unlisted trading privileges) pursuant to SEC Rule [[Page 5151]] 19b-4(e) under the Act, which pertains to derivative securities products (``SEC Rule 19b-4(e)'').\13\ SEC Rule 19b-4(e)(1) provides that the listing and trading of a new derivative securities product by a self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') is not deemed a proposed rule change, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of Rule 19b-4,\14\ if the Commission has approved, pursuant to section 19(b) of the Act, the SRO's trading rules, procedures and listing standards for the product class that would include the new derivative securities product and the SRO has a surveillance program for the product class. This is the current method pursuant to which ``passive'' ETFs are listed under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e). As provided under SEC Rule 19b-4(e), the term ``new derivative securities product'' means any type of option, warrant, hybrid securities product or any other security, other than a single equity option or a security futures product, whose value is based, in whole or in part, upon the performance of, or interest in, an underlying instrument. \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(c)(1). As provided under SEC Rule 19b- 4(c)(1), a stated policy, practice, or interpretation of the SRO shall be deemed to be a proposed rule change unless it is reasonably and fairly implied by an existing rule of the SRO. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange would also specify within Commentary .01 to Rule 8.600 that components of Managed Fund Shares listed pursuant to SEC Rule 19b- 4(e) must satisfy on an initial and continued basis certain specific criteria, which the Exchange would include within Commentary .01, as described in greater detail below. As proposed, the Exchange would continue to file separate proposed rule changes before the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares with components that do not satisfy the additional criteria described below or components other than those specified below. For example, if the components of a Managed Fund Share exceeded one of the applicable thresholds, the Exchange would file a separate proposed rule change before listing and trading such Managed Fund Share. Similarly, if the components of a Managed Fund Share included a security or asset that is not specified below, the Exchange would file a separate proposed rule change. The Exchange would also add to the criteria of Rule 8.600(c) to provide that the Web site for each series of Managed Fund Shares shall disclose certain information regarding the Disclosed Portfolio, to the extent applicable. The required information includes the following, to the extent applicable: Ticker symbol, CUSIP or other identifier, a description of the holding, identity of the asset upon which the derivative is based, the strike price for any options, the quantity of each security or other asset held as measured by select metrics, maturity date, coupon rate, effective date, market value and percentage weight of the holding in the portfolio.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included disclosure requirements with respect to each portfolio holding, as applicable to the type of holding. See, e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72666 (July 3, 2014), 79 FR 44224 (July 30, 2014) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-122) (the ``PIMCO Total Return Use of Derivatives Approval''), at 44227. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the Exchange would amend Rule 8.600(d) to specify that all Managed Fund Shares must have a stated investment objective, which must be adhered to under normal market conditions.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ The Exchange would also add a new defined term under Rule 8.600(c)(5) to specify that the term ``normal market conditions'' includes, but is not limited to, the absence of trading halts in the applicable financial markets generally; operational issues causing dissemination of inaccurate market information; or force majeure type events such as systems failure, natural or man-made disaster, act of God, armed conflict, act of terrorism, riot or labor disruption or any similar intervening circumstance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Exchange would also amend the continued listing requirement in Rule 8.600(d)(2)(A) by changing the requirement that a Portfolio Indicative Value for Managed Fund Shares be widely disseminated by one or more major market data vendors at least every 15 seconds during the time when the Managed Fund Shares trade on the Exchange to a requirement that a Portfolio Indicative Value be widely disseminated by one or more major market data vendors at least every 15 seconds during the Core Trading Session (as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34). Proposed Managed Fund Share Portfolio Standards The Exchange is proposing standards that would pertain to Managed Fund Shares to qualify for listing and trading pursuant to SEC Rule 19b-4(e). These standards would be grouped according to security or asset type. The Exchange notes that the standards proposed for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds U.S. Component Stocks, Non-U.S. Component Stocks, Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities are based in large part on the existing equity security standards applicable to Units in Commentary .01 to Rule 5.2(j)(3). The standards proposed for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds fixed income securities are based in large part on the existing fixed income security standards applicable to Units in Commentary .02 to Rule 5.2(j)(3). Many of the standards proposed for other types of holdings in a Managed Fund Share portfolio are based on previous proposed rule changes for specific series of Managed Fund Shares.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See the PIMCO Total Return Use of Derivatives Approval. See also, Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 66321 (February 3, 2012), 77 FR 6850 (February 9, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2011-95) (the ``PIMCO Total Return Approval''); 69244 (March 27, 2013), 78 FR 19766 (April 2, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-08) (the ``SPDR Blackstone/GSO Senior Loan Approval''); 68870 (February 8, 2013), 78 FR 11245 (February 15, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2012-139) (the ``First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Approval''); 69591 (May 16, 2013), 78 FR 30372 (May 22, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-33) (the ``International Bear Approval''); 61697 (March 12, 2010), 75 FR 13616 (March 22, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-04) (the ``WisdomTree Real Return Approval''); and 67054 (May 24, 2012), 77 FR 32161 (May 31, 2012) (SR-NYSEArca-2012- 25) (the ``WisdomTree Brazil Bond Approval''). Certain standards proposed herein for Managed Fund Shares are also based on previous proposed rule changes for specific series of Units for which Commission approval for listing was required due to the Units not satisfying certain standards of Commentary .01 and .02 to Rule 5.2(j)(3). See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69373 (April 15, 2013), 78 FR 23601 (April 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2012- 108) (the ``NYSE Arca U.S. Equity Synthetic Reverse Convertible Index Fund Approval''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Commentary .01(a) would describe the standards for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds equity securities, which are defined to be U.S. Component Stocks,\18\ Non-U.S. Component Stocks,\19\ Derivative Securities Products,\20\ and Index-Linked Securities \21\ listed on a national securities exchange. For Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities, no more than 25% of the equity weight of the portfolio could include leveraged and/or inverse leveraged Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ For the purposes of Commentary .01 and this proposal, the term ``U.S. Component Stocks'' would have the same meaning as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). \19\ For the purposes of Commentary .01 and this proposal, the term ``Non-U.S. Component Stocks'' would have the same meaning as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). \20\ For the purposes of Commentary .01 and this proposal, the term ``Derivative Securities Products'' would have the same meaning as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34(a)(4)(A). \21\ Index-Linked Securities are securities listed under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(6). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As proposed in Commentary .01(a)(1) to Rule 8.600, the component stocks of the equity portion of a portfolio that are U.S. Component Stocks shall meet the following criteria: (1) Component stocks (excluding Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) that in the aggregate account for at least 90% of the equity weight of the portfolio (excluding such Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) each must [[Page 5152]] have a minimum market value of at least $75 million; \22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(A)(1) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, and the addition of the reference to Index-Linked Securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Component stocks (excluding Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) that in the aggregate account for at least 70% of the equity weight of the portfolio (excluding such Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) each must have a minimum monthly trading volume of 250,000 shares, or minimum notional volume traded per month of $25,000,000, averaged over the last six months; \23\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(A)(2) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, and the addition of the reference to Index-Linked Securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) The most heavily weighted component stock (excluding Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) must not exceed 30% of the equity weight of the portfolio, and, to the extent applicable, the five most heavily weighted component stocks (excluding Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities) must not exceed 65% of the equity weight of the portfolio; \24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \24\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(A)(3) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, and the addition of the reference to Index-Linked Securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Where the equity portion of the portfolio does not include Non- U.S. Component Stocks, the equity portion of the portfolio shall include a minimum of 13 component stocks; provided, however, that there shall be no minimum number of component stocks if (a) one or more series of Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities constitute, at least in part, components underlying a series of Managed Fund Shares, or (b) one or more series of Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities account for 100% of the equity weight of the portfolio of a series of Managed Fund Shares; \25\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(A)(4) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, the addition of the reference to Index-Linked Securities, and the reference to the 100% limit applying to the ``equity portion'' of the portfolio. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5) Except as provided in proposed Commentary .01(a), equity securities in the portfolio must be U.S. Component Stocks listed on a national securities exchange and must be NMS Stocks as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS; \26\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \26\ 17 CFR 240.600. This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(A)(5) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the addition of ``equity'' to make clear that the standard applies to ``equity securities'', the exclusion of unsponsored ADRs, and the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (6) For Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities, no more than 25% of the equity weight of the portfolio could include leveraged and/or inverse leveraged Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities; and (7) American Depositary Receipts (``ADRs'') may be sponsored or unsponsored. However no more than 10% of the equity weight of the portfolio shall consist of unsponsored ADRs.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included the ability for such Managed Fund Share holdings to include not more than 10% of net assets in unsponsored ADRs. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71067 (December 12, 20113), 78 FR 76669 (December 18, 2013) (order approving listing and trading of shares of the SPDR MFS Systematic Core Equity ETF, SPDR MFS Systematic Growth Equity ETF, and SPDR MFS Systematic Value Equity ETF under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As proposed in Commentary .01(a)(2) to Rule 8.600, the component stocks of the equity portion of a portfolio that are Non-U.S. Component Stocks shall meet the following criteria: (1) Non-U.S. Component Stocks each shall have a minimum market value of at least $100 million; \28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ The proposed text is identical to the corresponding representation from the ``SSgA Global Managed Volatility Release'', as defined in footnote 27, below. The proposed text is also identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(B)(1) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, and that each Non- U.S. Component Stock must have a minimum market value of at least $100 million instead of the 90% required under Commentary .01(a)(B)(1) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) Non-U.S. Component Stocks each shall have a minimum global monthly trading volume of 250,000 shares, or minimum global notional volume traded per month of $25,000,000, averaged over the last six months; \29\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ The proposed text is identical to the corresponding representation from the SSgA Global Managed Volatility Release, as defined in footnote 27, below. This proposed text also is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(B)(2) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) The most heavily weighted Non-U.S. Component Stock shall not exceed 25% of the equity weight of the portfolio, and, to the extent applicable, the five most heavily weighted Non-U.S. Component Stocks shall not exceed 60% of the equity weight of the portfolio; \30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(B)(3) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Where the equity portion of the portfolio includes Non-U.S. Component Stocks, the equity portion of the portfolio shall include a minimum of 20 component stocks; provided, however, that there shall be no minimum number of component stocks if (i) one or more series of Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities constitute, at least in part, components underlying a series of Managed Fund Shares, or (ii) one or more series of Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities account for 100% of the equity weight of the portfolio of a series of Managed Fund Shares; \31\ and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ This proposed text is similar to the corresponding text of Commentary .01(a)(B)(4) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, the addition of the reference to Index-Linked Securities, the reference to the equity portion of the portfolio including Non-U.S. Component Stocks, and the reference to the 100% limitation applying to the ``equity weight'' of the portfolio, which is included because the proposed standards in Commentary .01 to Rule 8.600 permit the inclusion of non-equity securities, whereas Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) applies only to equity securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (5) Each Non-U.S. Component Stock shall be listed and traded on an exchange that has last-sale reporting.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ This proposed text is similar to Commentary .01(a)(B)(5) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) as it relates to Non-U.S. Component Stocks. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange notes that it is not proposing to require that any of the equity portion of the equity portfolio composed of Non-U.S. Component Stocks be listed on markets that are either a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') or a market with which the Exchange has a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement (``CSSA'').\33\ However, as further detailed below, the regulatory staff of the Exchange, or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), on behalf of the Exchange, will communicate as needed regarding trading in Managed Fund Shares with other markets that are members of the ISG, including U.S. securities exchanges on which the components are traded. The Exchange notes that the generic listing standards for Units based on foreign indexes in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) do not include specific ISG or CSSA requirements.\34\ In [[Page 5153]] addition, the Commission has approved listing and trading on the Exchange of shares of an issue of Managed Fund Shares under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600 where non-U.S. equity securities in such issue's portfolio meet specified criteria and where there is no requirement that such non-U.S. equity securities are traded in markets that are members of ISG or with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA.\35\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ A list of ISG members is available at www.isgportal.org. \34\ Under Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), Units with components that include Non-U.S. Component Stocks can hold a portfolio that is entirely composed of Non-U.S. Component Stocks that are listed on markets that are neither members of ISG, nor with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA. \35\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75023 (May 21, 2015), 80 FR 30519 (May 28, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2014-100) (order approving listing and trading on the Exchange of shares of the SPDR SSgA Global Managed Volatility ETF under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600) (``SSgA Global Managed Volatility Release''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Commentary .01(a)(3) would provide that the portfolio may hold rights and warrants, provided that the common stock underlying such rights or warrants must be U.S. Component Stocks or Non-U.S. Component Stocks that meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of Commentary .01. Proposed Commentary .01(b) would describe the standards for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds fixed income securities, which are debt securities \36\ that are notes, bonds, debentures or evidence of indebtedness that include, but are not limited to, U.S. Department of Treasury securities (``Treasury Securities''), government-sponsored entity securities (``GSE Securities''), municipal securities, trust preferred securities, supranational debt and debt of a foreign country or a subdivision thereof, investment grade and high yield corporate debt, bank loans, mortgage and asset backed securities, and commercial paper. The applicable portfolio holdings standards would be as follows: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \36\ Debt securities include a variety of fixed income obligations, including, but not limited to, corporate debt securities, government securities, municipal securities, convertible securities, and mortgage-backed securities. Debt securities include investment-grade securities, non-investment-grade securities, and unrated securities. Debt securities also include variable and floating rate securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Components that in the aggregate account for at least 75% of the fixed income weight of the portfolio each shall have a minimum original principal amount outstanding of $100 million or more; \37\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ This text of proposed Commentary .01(b)(1) to Rule 8.600 is based on the corresponding text of Commentary .02(a)(2) to Rule 5.2(j)(3) . --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) No component fixed-income security (excluding Treasury Securities and GSE Securities) could represent more than 30% of the fixed income weight of the portfolio, and the five most heavily weighted component fixed income securities in the portfolio must not in the aggregate account for more than 65% of the fixed income weight of the portfolio; \38\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ This proposed text is identical to the corresponding text of Commentary .02(a)(4) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) An underlying portfolio (excluding exempted securities) that includes fixed income securities must include a minimum of 13 non- affiliated issuers; provided, however, that there shall be no minimum number of non-affiliated issuers required for fixed income securities if at least 70% of the weight of the portfolio consists of equity securities as described in proposed Commentary .01(a).\39\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ This proposed text is similar to the corresponding text of Commentary .02(a)(5) to Rule 5.2(j)(3), except for the omission of the reference to ``index,'' which is not applicable, the exclusion of the text ``consisting entirely of exempted securities'' and the provision that there shall be no minimum number of non-affiliated issuers required for fixed income securities if at least 70% of the weight of the portfolio consists of equity securities as described in proposed Commentary .01(a). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (4) Component securities that in aggregate account for at least 90% of the fixed income weight of the portfolio must be either (a) from issuers that are required to file reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Act; (b) from issuers that have a worldwide market value of its outstanding common equity held by non-affiliates of $700 million or more; (c) from issuers that have outstanding securities that are notes, bonds debentures, or evidence of indebtedness having a total remaining principal amount of at least $1 billion; (d) exempted securities as defined in section 3(a)(12) of the Act; or (e) from issuers that are a government of a foreign country or a political subdivision of a foreign country; and (5) Non-agency, non-GSE and privately-issued mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities components of a portfolio shall not account, in the aggregate, for more than 20% of the weight of the fixed income portion of the portfolio.\40\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \40\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included the ability for such Managed Fund Share holdings to include up to 20% of net assets in non-agency, non-GSE and privately-issued mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75566 (July 30, 2015), 80 FR 46612 (August 5, 2015) (SR- NYSEArca-2015-42) (order approving listing and trading of shares of Newfleet Multi-Sector Unconstrained Bond ETF under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (6) Any convertible security must be convertible into an equity security that meets the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of Commentary .01. Proposed Commentary .01(c) would describe the standards for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds cash and cash equivalents.\41\ Specifically, the portfolio may hold short-term instruments with maturities of less than 3 months. There would be no limitation to the percentage of the portfolio invested in such holdings. Short-term instruments would include the following: \42\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included the ability for such Managed Fund Share holdings to include cash and cash equivalents. See, e.g., SPDR Blackstone/GSO Senior Loan Approval, supra note 17, at 19768-69 and First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Approval, supra note 17, at 76150. \42\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly specified short-term instruments with respect to their inclusion in Managed Fund Share holdings. See, e.g., First Trust Preferred Securities and Income Approval, supra note 17, at 76150-51. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) U.S. Government securities, including bills, notes and bonds differing as to maturity and rates of interest, which are either issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or by U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities; (2) certificates of deposit issued against funds deposited in a bank or savings and loan association; (3) bankers' acceptances, which are short-term credit instruments used to finance commercial transactions; (4) repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements; (5) bank time deposits, which are monies kept on deposit with banks or savings and loan associations for a stated period of time at a fixed rate of interest; (6) commercial paper, which are short-term unsecured promissory notes; and (7) money market funds. Proposed Commentary .01(d) would describe the standards for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds listed derivatives, including futures, options and swaps on commodities, currencies and financial instruments (e.g., stocks, fixed income, interest rates, and volatility) or a basket or index of any of the foregoing.\43\ There would be no limitation to the percentage of the portfolio invested in such holdings; provided, however, that, in the aggregate, at least 90% of the weight of such holdings invested in futures, exchange-traded options and swaps shall consist of futures, options and [[Page 5154]] swaps whose principal market is a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group (``ISG'') or is a market with which the Exchange has a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement (``CSSA'').\44\ Proposed Commentary .01(e) would describe the standards for a Managed Fund Share portfolio that holds over the counter (``OTC'') derivatives, including forwards, options and swaps on commodities, currencies and financial instruments (e.g., stocks, fixed income, interest rates, and volatility) or a basket or index of any of the foregoing.\45\ Proposed Commentary .01(e)(1) would provide that no more than 20% of the assets in the portfolio may be invested in OTC derivatives. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \43\ Proposed rule changes for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included the ability for such Managed Fund Share holdings to include listed derivatives. See, e.g., WisdomTree Real Return Approval, supra note 17, at 13617 and WisdomTree Brazil Bond Approval, supra note 17, at 32163. \44\ ISG is comprised of an international group of exchanges, market centers, and market regulators that perform front-line market surveillance in their respective jurisdictions. See https://www.isgportal.org/home.html. \45\ A proposed rule change for series of Units previously listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 5.2(j)(3) similarly included the ability for such Units' holdings to include OTC derivatives, specifically OTC down-and-in put options, which are not NMS Stocks as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS and therefore do not satisfy the requirements of Commentary .01(a)(A) to Rule 5.2(j)(3). See, e.g., NYSE Arca U.S. Equity Synthetic Reverse Convertible Index Fund Approval, supra note 17, at 23602. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposed Commentary .01(f) would provide that, to the extent that listed or OTC derivatives are used to gain exposure to individual equities and/or fixed income securities, or to indexes of equities and/ or fixed income securities, such equities and/or fixed income securities, as applicable, shall meet the criteria set forth in Commentary .01(a) and .01(b) to Rule 8.600, respectively. The Exchange believes that the proposed standards would continue to ensure transparency surrounding the listing process for Managed Fund Shares. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed portfolio standards for listing and trading Managed Fund Shares, many of which track existing Exchange rules relating to Units, are reasonably designed to promote a fair and orderly market for such Managed Fund Shares.\46\ These proposed standards would also work in conjunction with the existing initial and continued listing criteria related to surveillance procedures and trading guidelines. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \46\ See Approval Order, supra note 11 at 19548. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In support of this proposal, the Exchange represents that: \47\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \47\ The Exchange made similar representations in the Approval Order. See id. at 19549. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) The Managed Fund Shares will continue to conform to the initial and continued listing criteria under Rule 8.600; (2) the Exchange's surveillance procedures are adequate to continue to properly monitor the trading of the Managed Fund Shares in all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules. Specifically, the Exchange intends to utilize its existing surveillance procedures applicable to derivative products, which will include Managed Fund Shares, to monitor trading in the Managed Fund Shares; (3) prior to the commencement of trading of a particular series of Managed Fund Shares, the Exchange will inform its Equity Trading Permit (``ETP'') Holders in a Bulletin of the special characteristics and risks associated with trading the Managed Fund Shares, including procedures for purchases and redemptions of Managed Fund Shares, suitability requirements under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.2(a), the risks involved in trading the Managed Fund Shares during the Opening and Late Trading Sessions when an updated Portfolio Indicative Value will not be calculated or publicly disseminated, information regarding the Portfolio Indicative Value and the Disclosed Portfolio, prospectus delivery requirements, and other trading information. In addition, the Bulletin will disclose that the Managed Fund Shares are subject to various fees and expenses, as described in the applicable registration statement, and will discuss any exemptive, no-action, and interpretive relief granted by the Commission from any rules under the Act. Finally, the Bulletin will disclose that the net asset value for the Managed Fund Shares will be calculated after 4 p.m. ET each trading day; and (4) the issuer of a series of Managed Fund Shares will be required to comply with Rule 10A-3 under the Act for the initial and continued listing of Managed Fund Shares, as provided under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.3. The Exchange notes that the proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other issues and that the Exchange is not aware of any problems that ETP Holders or issuers would have in complying with the proposed change. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,\48\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\49\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \48\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). \49\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change is designed to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest because it would facilitate the listing and trading of additional Managed Fund Shares, which would enhance competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. Specifically, after more than six years under the current process, whereby the Exchange is required to file a proposed rule change with the Commission for the listing and trading of each new series of Managed Fund Shares, the Exchange believes that it is appropriate to codify certain rules within Rule 8.600 that would generally eliminate the need for separate proposed rule changes. The Exchange believes that this would facilitate the listing and trading of additional types of Managed Fund Shares that have investment portfolios that are similar to investment portfolios for Units, which have been approved for listing and trading, thereby creating greater efficiencies in the listing process for the Exchange and the Commission. In this regard, the Exchange notes that the standards proposed for Managed Fund Share portfolios that include U.S. Component Stocks, Non-U.S. Component Stocks, Derivative Securities Products, and Index-Linked Securities are based in large part on the existing equity security standards applicable to Units in Commentary .01 to Rule 5.2(j)(3) and that the standards proposed for Managed Fund Share portfolios that include fixed income securities are based in large part on the existing fixed income standards applicable to Units in Commentary .02 to Rule 5.2(j)(3). Additionally, many of the standards proposed for other types of holdings of series of Managed Fund Shares are based on previous proposed rule changes for specific series of Managed Fund Shares.\50\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \50\ See supra, note 17. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the proposed addition to the criteria of Rule 8.600(c) to provide that the Web site for each series of Managed Fund Shares shall disclose certain information regarding the Disclosed Portfolio, to the extent applicable, the Exchange notes that proposed rule changes approved by the Commission for previously-listed series of Managed Fund Shares have similarly included disclosure requirements with respect to each portfolio holding, as [[Page 5155]] applicable to the type of holding.\51\ With respect to the proposed exclusion of Derivatives Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities from the requirements of proposed Commentary .01(a) of Rule 8.600, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to exclude Index-Linked Securities as well as Derivative Securities Products from certain component stock eligibility criteria for Managed Fund Shares in so far as Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities are themselves subject to specific quantitative listing and continued listing requirements of a national securities exchange on which such securities are listed. Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities that are components of a fund's portfolio would have been listed and traded on a national securities exchange pursuant to a proposed rule change approved by the Commission pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act \52\ or submitted by a national securities exchange pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \53\ or would have been listed by a national securities exchange pursuant to the requirements of Rule 19b-4(e) under the Act.\54\ The Exchange also notes that Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities are derivatively priced, and, therefore, the Exchange believes that it would not be necessary to apply the proposed generic quantitative criteria (e.g., market capitalization, trading volume, or portfolio component weighting) applicable to equity securities other than Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities (e.g., common stocks) to such products.\55\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \51\ See supra, note 15. \52\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \53\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). \54\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(e). \55\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57561 (March 26, 2008), 73 FR 17390 (April 1, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-29) (notice of filing of proposed rule change to amend eligibility criteria for components of an index underlying Investment Company Units); 57751 (May 1, 2008), 73 FR 25818 (May 7, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-29) (order approving proposed rule change to amend eligibility criteria for components of an index underlying Investment Company Units). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the proposed criteria applicable to U.S. Component Stocks, the Exchange notes that such criteria are similar to those in Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) relating to criteria applicable to an index or portfolio of U.S. Component Stocks. In addition, Non-U.S. Component Stocks also will be required to meet criteria similar to certain generic listing standards in Commentary .01 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3) relating to criteria applicable to an index or portfolio of U.S. Component Stocks and Non-U.S. Component Stocks underlying a series of Units to be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 19b-4(e) under the Act. With respect to the proposed requirement in Commentary .01(a)(1)(G) that no more than 10% of the equity weight of the portfolio shall consist of unsponsored ADRs, the Exchange notes that such requirement will ensure that unsponsored ADRs, which are traded OTC and which generally have less market transparency than sponsored ADRs, could account for only a small percentage of the equity weight of a portfolio. Further, the requirement is consistent with representations made in proposed rule changes for issues of Managed Fund Shares previously approved by the Commission.\56\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \56\ See note 27, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the proposed requirement in Commentary .01(a)(3) that a the common stock underlying rights or warrants in a portfolio must be U.S. Component Stocks or Non-U.S. Component Stocks that meet the criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of Commentary .01, such requirement would assure that common stocks underlying an issue of rights or warrants meet the liquidity and other criteria in Commentary .01 applicable to U.S. Component Stocks and Non- U.S. Component Stocks. Similarly, with respect to the proposed requirement in Commentary .01(b)(6) that any convertible security must be convertible into an equity security that meets the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of Commentary .01, such requirement would assure that the equity securities into which a convertible security could be converted meet the liquidity and other criteria in Commentary .01 applicable to such equity securities (i.e., U.S. Component Stocks and Non-U.S. Component Stocks). With respect to the proposed amendment to the continued listing requirement in Rule 8.600(d)(2)(A) to require dissemination of a Portfolio Indicative Value at least every 15 seconds during the Core Trading Session (as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.34), such requirement conforms to the requirement applicable to the dissemination of the Intraday Indicative Value for Units in Commentary .01(c) and Commentary .02 (c) to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). In addition, such dissemination is consistent with representations made in proposed rule changes for issues of Managed Fund Shares previously approved by the Commission.\57\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \57\ See, e.g., Approval Order, supra note 11; International Bear Approval, supra note 17. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the proposed requirement in Commentary .01(b)(3) to Rule 8.600 that an underlying portfolio (excluding exempted securities) that includes fixed income securities must include a minimum of 13 non- affiliated issuers, but that there would be no minimum number of non- affiliated issuers required for fixed income securities if at least 70% of the weight of the portfolio consists of equity securities, the Exchange notes that such requirement is consistent with proposed Commentary .01(b)(2). The Exchange further notes that Commentary .02 (a)(4) to Rule 5.2(j)(3) currently provides that a single fixed income security can represent up to 30% of the weight of an index underlying a series of Units. Proposed Commentary .01(b)(3) to Rule 8.600, therefore, provides for a maximum weighting of a fixed income security in a fund's portfolio comparable to existing rules applicable to Units based on fixed income indexes. With respect to the proposed requirement in Commentary .01(b)(5) that non-agency, non-GSE and privately-issued mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities components of a portfolio shall not account, in the aggregate, for more than 20% of the weight of the fixed income portion of the portfolio, the Exchange notes that such requirement is consistent with representations made in proposed rule changes for issues of Managed Fund Shares previously approved by the Commission.\58\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \58\ See note 40, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to the proposed amendment to Commentary .01(c) relating to cash and cash equivalents, while there is no limitation on the amount of cash and cash equivalents that can make up the portfolio, such instruments are short-term, highly liquid, and of high credit quality, making them less susceptible than other asset classes both to price manipulation and volatility. Further, the requirement is consistent with representations made in proposed rule changes for issues of Managed Fund Shares previously approved by the Commission.\59\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \59\ See note 41, supra. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to proposed Commentary .01(d)(1) to Rule 8.600 relating to listed derivatives, the Exchange believes that it is appropriate that there be no limit to the percentage of a portfolio invested in such holdings, provided that, in the aggregate, at least 90% of the weight of such holdings [[Page 5156]] invested in futures, exchange-traded options and swaps would consist of futures and options whose principal market is a member of ISG or is a market with which the Exchange has a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. Such a requirement would facilitate information sharing among market participants trading shares of a series on Managed Fund Shares as well as futures and options that such series may hold. In addition, listed swaps would be centrally cleared, reducing counterparty risk and thereby furthering investor protection.\60\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \60\ The Commission has noted that ``[c]entral clearing mitigates counterparty risk among dealers and other institutions by shifting that risk from individual counterparties to [central counterparties (``CCPs'')], thereby protecting CCPs from each other's potential failures.'' See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67286 (June 28, 2012) (File No. S7-44-10) (Process for Submissions for Review of Security-Based Swaps for Mandatory Clearing and Notice Filing Requirements for Clearing Agencies). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to proposed Commentary .01(e) to Rule 8.600 relating to OTC derivatives, the Exchange believes that the limitation to 20% of assets for non-centrally cleared derivatives would assure that the preponderance of fund investments would not be in derivatives that are not listed and centrally cleared. The Exchange believes that such a limitation is sufficient to mitigate the risks associated with price manipulation because a 20% cap on OTC derivatives will ensure that any series of Managed Fund Shares will be sufficiently broad-based in scope to minimize potential manipulation associated with OTC derivatives and because the remaining 80% of the portfolio will consist of instruments subject to numerous restrictions designed to prevent manipulation, including equity securities (which, as proposed, would be subject to market cap, trading volume, and diversity requirements, among others), fixed income securities (which, as proposed, would be subject to principal amount outstanding, diversity, and issuer requirements, among others), cash and cash equivalents (which, as proposed, would be limited to short-term, highly liquid, and high credit quality instruments), and/or listed derivatives (which, as proposed, 90% of the weight of such listed derivatives will be futures, options and swaps whose principal market is a member of ISG). With respect to proposed Commentary .01(f) to Rule 8.600 relating to a fund's use of listed or OTC derivatives to gain exposure to individual equities and/or fixed income securities, or to indexes of equities and/or indexes of fixed income securities, the Exchange notes that such exposure would be required to meet the numerical and other criteria set forth in proposed Commentary .01(a) and .01(b) to Rule 8.600 respectively. The Exchange notes that, for purposes of this proposal, a portfolio's investment in OTC derivatives will be calculated as the amount of any margin required by a counterparty for the purchase of a derivative by a fund. Quotation and other market information relating to listed futures and options is available from the exchanges listing such instruments as well as from market data vendors. With respect to centrally-cleared swaps \61\ and non-centrally-cleared swaps regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the ``CFTC''),\62\ the Dodd-Frank Act mandates that swap information be reported to swap data repositories (``SDRs'').\63\ SDRs provide a central facility for swap data reporting and recordkeeping and are required to comply with data standards set by the CFTC, including real-time public reporting of swap transaction data to a derivatives clearing organization or SEF.\64\ SDRs require real- time reporting of all OTC and centrally cleared derivatives, including public reporting of the swap price and size. The parties responsible for reporting swaps information are CFTC-registered swap dealers (``RSDs''), major swap participants, and SEFs. If swap counterparties do not fall into the above categories, then one of the parties to the swap must report the trade to the SDR. Cleared swaps regulated by the CFTC must be executed on a Designated Contract Market (``DCM'') or SEF. Such cleared swaps have the same reporting requirements as futures, including end-of-day price, volume, and open interest. CFTC swaps reporting requirements require public dissemination of, among other items, product ID (if available); asset class; underlying reference asset, reference issuer, or reference index; termination date; date and time of execution; price, including currency; notional amounts, including currency; whether direct or indirect counterparties include an RSD; whether cleared or un-cleared; and platform ID of where the contract was executed (if applicable). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \61\ There are currently five categories of swaps eligible for central clearing: Interest rate swaps; credit default swaps; foreign exchange swaps; equity swaps; and commodity swaps. The following entities provide central clearing for OTC derivatives: ICE Clear Credit (US); ICE Clear (EU); CME Group; LCH.Clearnet; and Eurex. \62\ Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, OTC and centrally-cleared swaps are regulated by the CFTC with the exception of security-based swaps, which are regulated by the Commission. \63\ The following entities are provisionally registered with the CFTC as SDRs: BSDR LLC., Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc., DTCC Data Repository, and ICE Trade Vault. \64\ Approximately 21 entities are currently temporarily registered with the CFTC as SEFs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to security-based swaps regulated by the Commission, the Commission has adopted Regulation SBSR under the Act implementing requirements for regulatory reporting and public dissemination of security-based swap transactions set forth in title VII of the Dodd- Frank Act. Regulation SBSR provides for the reporting of security-based swap information to registered security-based swap data repositories (``Registered SDRs'') or the Commission, and the public dissemination of security-based swap transaction, volume, and pricing information by Registered SDRs.\65\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \65\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74244 (February 11, 2015), 80 FR 14564 (March 19, 2015) (Regulation SBSR--Reporting and Dissemination of Security-Based Swap Information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Price information relating to forwards and OTC options will be available from major market data vendors. The Exchange notes that a fund's investments in derivative instruments would be subject to limits on leverage imposed by the 1940 Act. Section 18(f) of the 1940 Act and related Commission guidance limit the amount of leverage an investment company can obtain. A fund's investments would be consistent with its investment objective and would not be used to enhance leverage. To limit the potential risk associated with a fund's use of derivatives, a fund will segregate or ``earmark'' assets determined to be liquid by a fund in accordance with the 1940 Act (or, as permitted by applicable regulation, enter into certain offsetting positions) to cover its obligations under derivative instruments. A fund's investments will not be used to seek performance that is the multiple or inverse multiple (i.e., 2Xs and 3Xs) of a fund's broad-based securities market index (as defined in Form N- 1A).\66\ In addition, the Exchange notes that, under proposed Commentary .01(a) to Rule 8.600, for Derivative Securities Products and Index-Linked Securities, no more than 25% of the equity weight of a fund's portfolio could include leveraged and/or inverse leveraged Derivative Securities Products or Index-Linked Securities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \66\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74842 (April 29, 2015), 86 FR 25723 (May 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2014-89) (order approving listing and trading of shares of eight PIMCO exchange- traded funds). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change is also designed to protect investors and the public interest because Managed Fund Shares listed and traded pursuant to [[Page 5157]] Rule 8.600, including pursuant to the proposed new portfolio standards, would continue to be subject to the full panoply of Exchange rules and procedures that currently govern the trading of equity securities on the Exchange.\67\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \67\ See Approval Order, supra note 11, at 19547. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The proposed rule change is also designed to protect investors and the public interest as well as to promote just and equitable principles of trade in that any Non-U.S. Component Stocks will each meet the following criteria initially and on a continuing basis: (1) Have a minimum market value of at least $100 million; (2) have a minimum global monthly trading volume of 250,000 shares, or minimum global notional volume traded per month of $25,000,000, averaged over the last six months; (3) most heavily weighted Non-U.S. Component Stock shall not exceed 25% of the equity weight of the portfolio, and, to the extent applicable, the five most heavily weighted Non-U.S. Component Stocks shall not exceed 60% of the equity weight of the portfolio; and (4) each Non-U.S. Component Stock shall be listed and traded on an exchange that has last-sale reporting. The Exchange believes that such quantitative criteria are sufficient to mitigate any concerns that may arise on the basis of a series of Managed Fund Shares potentially holding 100% of its assets in Non-U.S. Component Stocks that are neither listed on members of ISG nor exchanges with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA because, as stated above, such criteria are either the same or more stringent than the portfolio requirements for Index Fund Shares that hold Non-U.S. Component Stocks and there are no such requirements related to such securities being listed on an exchange that is a member of ISG or with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA. Further, the Exchange has not encountered and is not aware of any instances of manipulation or other negative impact in any series of Index Fund Shares that has occurred by virtue of the Index Fund Shares holding such Non-U.S. Component Stocks. As such, the Exchange believes that there should be no difference in the portfolio requirements for Managed Fund Shares and Index Fund Shares as it relates to holding Non- U.S. Component Stocks that are not listed on an exchange that is a member of ISG or with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices because the Managed Fund Shares will be listed and traded on the Exchange pursuant to the initial and continued listing criteria in Rule 8.600. The Exchange has in place surveillance procedures that are adequate to properly monitor trading in the Managed Fund Shares in all trading sessions and to deter and detect violations of Exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws. FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange, or the regulatory staff of the Exchange, will communicate as needed regarding trading in Managed Fund Shares with other markets that are members of the ISG, including all U.S. securities exchanges and futures exchanges on which the components are traded. In addition, the Exchange may obtain information regarding trading in Managed Fund Shares from other markets that are members of the ISG, including all U.S. securities exchanges and futures exchanges on which the components are traded, or with which the Exchange has in place a CSSA. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change would fulfill the intended objective of Rule 19b-4(e) under the Act by allowing Managed Fund Shares that satisfy the proposed listing standards to be listed and traded without separate Commission approval. However, as proposed, the Exchange would continue to file separate proposed rule changes before the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares that do not satisfy the additional criteria described above. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\68\ the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would facilitate the listing and trading of additional types of Managed Fund Shares and result in a significantly more efficient process surrounding the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares, which will enhance competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. The Exchange believes that this would reduce the time frame for bringing Managed Fund Shares to market, thereby reducing the burdens on issuers and other market participants and promoting competition. In turn, the Exchange believes that the proposed change would make the process for listing Managed Fund Shares more competitive by applying uniform listing standards with respect to Managed Fund Shares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \68\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 2 to proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to [email protected]. Please include File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-110 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-110. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does [[Page 5158]] not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-110 and should be submitted on or before February 16, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\69\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \69\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-01714 Filed 1-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2016 / Notices 5149
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for hours to draft and execute additional information unless it displays a
extension and approval. clauses in new subadvisory contracts in currently valid OMB control number.
Rule 17e–1 (17 CFR 270.17e–1) under order for funds and subadvisers to be Written comments are invited on: (a)
the Investment Company Act of 1940 able to rely on the exemptions in rule Whether the proposed collection of
(15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) (the 17e–1. Because these additional clauses information is necessary for the proper
‘‘Investment Company Act’’) deems a are identical to the clauses that a fund performance of the functions of the
remuneration as ‘‘not exceeding the would need to insert in their agency, including whether the
usual and customary broker’s subadvisory contracts to rely on rules information will have practical utility;
commission’’ for purposes of Section 12d3–1, 10f–3, and 17a–10, and because (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
17(e)(2)(A) if, among other things, a we believe that funds that use one such estimate of the burden of the collection
registered investment company’s rule generally use all of these rules, we of information; (c) ways to enhance the
(‘‘fund’s’’) board of directors has apportion this 3 hour time burden quality, utility, and clarity of the
adopted procedures reasonably equally to all four rules. Therefore, we information collected; and (d) ways to
designed to provide that the estimate that the burden allocated to minimize the burden of the collection of
remuneration to an affiliated broker is a rule 17e–1 for this contract change information on respondents, including
reasonable and fair amount compared to would be 0.75 hours.2 Assuming that all through the use of automated collection
that received by other brokers in 320 funds enter into new subadvisory techniques or other forms of information
connection with comparable contracts each year make the technology. Consideration will be given
transactions involving similar securities modification to their contract required to comments and suggestions submitted
being purchased or sold on a securities by the rule, we estimate that the rule’s in writing within 60 days of this
exchange during a comparable period of contract modification requirement will publication.
time and the board makes and approves result in 240 burden hours annually.3 Please direct your written comments
such changes as it deems necessary. In Based on an analysis of fund filings, to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
addition, each quarter, the board must we estimate that approximately 1,696 Information Officer, Securities and
determine that all transactions effected funds use at least one affiliated broker. Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
under the rule during the preceding Based on staff experience and Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE.,
quarter complied with the established conversations with fund representatives, Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
procedures. Rule 17e–1 also requires the the staff estimates approximately 40 to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
fund to (i) maintain permanently a percent of transactions (and thus, 40%
written copy of the procedures adopted of funds) that occur under the rule 17e– Dated: January 25, 2016.
by the board for complying with the 1 would be exempt from its Robert W. Errett,
requirements of the rule; and (ii) recordkeeping and review requirements. Deputy Secretary.
maintain for a period of six years, the This would leave approximately 1,018 [FR Doc. 2016–01717 Filed 1–29–16; 8:45 am]
first two in an easily accessible place, a funds 4 still subject to the rule’s BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
written record of each transaction recordkeeping and review requirements.
subject to the rule, setting forth the Based on staff experience and
amount and source of the commission, conversations with fund representatives, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
fee, or other remuneration received; the we estimate that the burden of COMMISSION
identity of the broker; the terms of the compliance with rule 17e–1 is
[Release No. 34–76974; File No. SR–
transaction; and the materials used to approximately 50 hours per fund per
NYSEArca–2015–110]
determine that the transactions were year. This time is spent, for example,
effected in compliance with the reviewing the applicable transactions Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
procedures adopted by the board. The and maintaining records. Accordingly, Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
recordkeeping requirements under rule we calculate the total estimated annual Amendment No. 2 to Proposed Rule
17e–1 enable the Commission to ensure internal burden of complying with the Change Amending NYSE Arca Equities
that affiliated brokers receive review and recordkeeping requirements Rule 8.600 To Adopt Generic Listing
compensation that does not exceed the of rule 17e–1 to be approximately Standards for Managed Fund Shares
usual and customary broker’s 50,900 hours 5 and the total annual
commission. Without the recordkeeping burden of the rule’s paperwork January 26, 2016.
requirements, Commission inspectors requirements is 51,140 hours.6 On November 6, 2015, NYSE Arca,
would have difficulty ascertaining Estimates of average burden hours are Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
whether funds were complying with made solely for the purposes of the with the Securities and Exchange
rule 17e–1. Paperwork Reduction Act and are not Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
Based on an analysis of fund filings, derived from a comprehensive or even to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
the staff estimates that approximately a representative survey or study of the Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
320 funds enter into subadvisory costs of Commission rules and forms. 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
agreements each year.1 Based on The collection of information under rule change to adopt generic listing
discussions with industry 17e–1 is mandatory. The information standards for Managed Fund Shares.
representatives, the staff estimates that provided under rule 17e–1 will not be The proposed rule change was
it will require approximately 3 attorney kept confidential. An agency may not published for comment in the Federal
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not Register on November 27, 2015.3 On
1 Based on data from Morningstar, as of
required to respond to, a collection of November 23, 2015, after issuance of the
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
September, 2015, there are 12,426 registered funds
(open-end funds, closed-end funds, and exchange- Notice but before its publication, the
23 hours ÷ 4 rules = 0.75 hours.
traded funds), 4,683 funds of which have 3 This
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
subadvisory relationships (approximately 38%). estimate is based on the following
Based on data from the 2015 ICI Factbook, 843 new calculation: 0.75 hours × 320 funds = 240 burden
funds were established in 2014 (654 open-end hours. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
4 1,696 funds × 0.6 = 1,018 funds. 2 17
funds + 176 exchange-traded funds + 13 closed-end CFR 240.19b–4.
5 1,018 funds × 50 hours per fund = 50,900 hours. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76486
funds (from the ICI Research Perspective, April
2015)). 843 new funds × 38% = 320 funds. 6 240 hours + 50,900 hours = 51,140 hours. (Nov. 20, 2015), 80 FR 74169 (‘‘Notice’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:33 Jan 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_5169/page/1.svg)
![5156 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2016 / Notices
invested in futures, exchange-traded the Exchange notes that such exposure whether direct or indirect
options and swaps would consist of would be required to meet the counterparties include an RSD; whether
futures and options whose principal numerical and other criteria set forth in cleared or un-cleared; and platform ID
market is a member of ISG or is a market proposed Commentary .01(a) and .01(b) of where the contract was executed (if
with which the Exchange has a to Rule 8.600 respectively. The applicable).
comprehensive surveillance sharing Exchange notes that, for purposes of this With respect to security-based swaps
agreement. Such a requirement would proposal, a portfolio’s investment in regulated by the Commission, the
facilitate information sharing among OTC derivatives will be calculated as Commission has adopted Regulation
market participants trading shares of a the amount of any margin required by SBSR under the Act implementing
series on Managed Fund Shares as well a counterparty for the purchase of a requirements for regulatory reporting
as futures and options that such series derivative by a fund. and public dissemination of security-
may hold. In addition, listed swaps Quotation and other market based swap transactions set forth in title
would be centrally cleared, reducing information relating to listed futures VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. Regulation
counterparty risk and thereby furthering and options is available from the SBSR provides for the reporting of
investor protection.60 exchanges listing such instruments as security-based swap information to
With respect to proposed well as from market data vendors. With registered security-based swap data
Commentary .01(e) to Rule 8.600 respect to centrally-cleared swaps 61 and repositories (‘‘Registered SDRs’’) or the
relating to OTC derivatives, the non-centrally-cleared swaps regulated Commission, and the public
Exchange believes that the limitation to by the Commodity Futures Trading dissemination of security-based swap
20% of assets for non-centrally cleared Commission (the ‘‘CFTC’’),62 the Dodd- transaction, volume, and pricing
derivatives would assure that the Frank Act mandates that swap information by Registered SDRs.65
preponderance of fund investments information be reported to swap data Price information relating to forwards
would not be in derivatives that are not repositories (‘‘SDRs’’).63 SDRs provide a and OTC options will be available from
listed and centrally cleared. The central facility for swap data reporting major market data vendors.
Exchange believes that such a limitation and recordkeeping and are required to The Exchange notes that a fund’s
is sufficient to mitigate the risks comply with data standards set by the investments in derivative instruments
associated with price manipulation CFTC, including real-time public would be subject to limits on leverage
because a 20% cap on OTC derivatives reporting of swap transaction data to a imposed by the 1940 Act. Section 18(f)
will ensure that any series of Managed derivatives clearing organization or of the 1940 Act and related Commission
Fund Shares will be sufficiently broad- SEF.64 SDRs require real-time reporting guidance limit the amount of leverage
based in scope to minimize potential of all OTC and centrally cleared an investment company can obtain. A
manipulation associated with OTC derivatives, including public reporting fund’s investments would be consistent
derivatives and because the remaining of the swap price and size. The parties with its investment objective and would
80% of the portfolio will consist of responsible for reporting swaps not be used to enhance leverage. To
instruments subject to numerous information are CFTC-registered swap limit the potential risk associated with
restrictions designed to prevent dealers (‘‘RSDs’’), major swap a fund’s use of derivatives, a fund will
manipulation, including equity participants, and SEFs. If swap segregate or ‘‘earmark’’ assets
securities (which, as proposed, would counterparties do not fall into the above determined to be liquid by a fund in
be subject to market cap, trading categories, then one of the parties to the accordance with the 1940 Act (or, as
volume, and diversity requirements, swap must report the trade to the SDR. permitted by applicable regulation,
among others), fixed income securities Cleared swaps regulated by the CFTC enter into certain offsetting positions) to
(which, as proposed, would be subject must be executed on a Designated cover its obligations under derivative
to principal amount outstanding, Contract Market (‘‘DCM’’) or SEF. Such instruments. A fund’s investments will
diversity, and issuer requirements, cleared swaps have the same reporting not be used to seek performance that is
among others), cash and cash requirements as futures, including end- the multiple or inverse multiple (i.e.,
equivalents (which, as proposed, would of-day price, volume, and open interest. 2Xs and 3Xs) of a fund’s broad-based
be limited to short-term, highly liquid, CFTC swaps reporting requirements securities market index (as defined in
and high credit quality instruments), require public dissemination of, among Form N–1A).66 In addition, the
and/or listed derivatives (which, as other items, product ID (if available); Exchange notes that, under proposed
proposed, 90% of the weight of such asset class; underlying reference asset, Commentary .01(a) to Rule 8.600, for
listed derivatives will be futures, reference issuer, or reference index; Derivative Securities Products and
options and swaps whose principal termination date; date and time of Index-Linked Securities, no more than
market is a member of ISG). execution; price, including currency; 25% of the equity weight of a fund’s
With respect to proposed notional amounts, including currency; portfolio could include leveraged and/or
Commentary .01(f) to Rule 8.600 relating
inverse leveraged Derivative Securities
to a fund’s use of listed or OTC 61 There are currently five categories of swaps
eligible for central clearing: Interest rate swaps; Products or Index-Linked Securities.
derivatives to gain exposure to The proposed rule change is also
credit default swaps; foreign exchange swaps;
individual equities and/or fixed income equity swaps; and commodity swaps. The following designed to protect investors and the
securities, or to indexes of equities and/ entities provide central clearing for OTC public interest because Managed Fund
or indexes of fixed income securities, derivatives: ICE Clear Credit (US); ICE Clear (EU);
CME Group; LCH.Clearnet; and Eurex. Shares listed and traded pursuant to
62 Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, OTC and
60 The Commission has noted that ‘‘[c]entral
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
clearing mitigates counterparty risk among dealers centrally-cleared swaps are regulated by the CFTC 65 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74244
and other institutions by shifting that risk from with the exception of security-based swaps, which (February 11, 2015), 80 FR 14564 (March 19, 2015)
individual counterparties to [central counterparties are regulated by the Commission. (Regulation SBSR—Reporting and Dissemination of
(‘‘CCPs’’)], thereby protecting CCPs from each 63 The following entities are provisionally Security-Based Swap Information).
other’s potential failures.’’ See Securities Exchange registered with the CFTC as SDRs: BSDR LLC., 66 See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No.
Act Release No. 67286 (June 28, 2012) (File No. S7– Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc., DTCC Data 74842 (April 29, 2015), 86 FR 25723 (May 5, 2015)
44–10) (Process for Submissions for Review of Repository, and ICE Trade Vault. (SR–NYSEArca–2014–89) (order approving listing
Security-Based Swaps for Mandatory Clearing and 64 Approximately 21 entities are currently and trading of shares of eight PIMCO exchange-
Notice Filing Requirements for Clearing Agencies). temporarily registered with the CFTC as SEFs. traded funds).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:33 Jan 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_5169/page/8.svg)
![5158 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 20 / Monday, February 1, 2016 / Notices
not edit personal identifying and basis for, the proposed rule change 2. Statutory Basis
information from submissions. You and discussed any comments it received The Exchange believes that the
should submit only information that on the proposed rule change. The text proposed rule change is consistent with
you wish to make available publicly. All of those statements may be examined at the provisions of section 6 of the Act,8
submissions should refer to File the places specified in Item IV below. in general, and sections 6(b)(4) and
Number SR–NYSEArca–2015–110 and The Exchange has prepared summaries, 6(b)(5) of the Act,9 in particular, in that
should be submitted on or before set forth in sections A, B, and C below, it provides an equitable allocation of
February 16, 2016. of the most significant parts of such reasonable fees among users and
For the Commission, by the Division of statements. recipients of the data and is not
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated designed to permit unfair
authority.69 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s discrimination among customers,
Robert W. Errett, Statement of the Purpose of, and the issuers, and brokers.
Deputy Secretary. Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule The fees are also equitable and not
[FR Doc. 2016–01714 Filed 1–29–16; 8:45 am]
Change unfairly discriminatory because they
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1. Purpose will apply to all data recipients that
choose to subscribe to NYSE Integrated
The Exchange proposes to amend the Feed.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE fees for NYSE Integrated Feed market The Exchange believes that it is
COMMISSION data product,4 as set forth on the NYSE reasonable to require data recipients to
Proprietary Market Data Fee Schedule pay a modest additional fee taking a
[Release No. 34–76973; File No. SR–NYSE– data feed for a market data product in
2016–09] (‘‘Fee Schedule’’). The Exchange
proposes to establish the multiple data more than two locations, because such
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New data recipients can derive substantial
feed fee. Specifically, the Exchange
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of value from being able to consume the
proposes to establish a new monthly fee,
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of product in as many locations as they
the ‘‘Multiple Data Feed Fee,’’ that
a Proposed Rule Change Amending want. In addition, there are
would apply to data recipients that take administrative burdens associated with
the Fees for NYSE Integrated Feed a data feed for a market data product in tracking each location at which a data
January 26, 2016. more than two locations. Data recipients recipient receives the product. The
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the taking NYSE Integrated Feed in more Multiple Data Feed Fee is designed to
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the than two locations would be charged encourage data recipients to better
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 $200 per additional location per product manage their requests for additional
notice is hereby given that, on January per month.5 No new reporting would be data feeds and to monitor their usage of
13, 2016, New York Stock Exchange required.6 data feeds. The proposed fee is designed
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed Additionally, the various fees to apply to data feeds received in more
with the Securities and Exchange applicable to NYSE Integrated Feed, than two locations so that each data
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the other than the Multiple Data Feed Fee, recipient can have one primary and one
proposed rule change as described in became operative on January 1, 2016.7 backup data location before having to
Items I, II, and III below, which Items Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to pay a multiple data feed fee. The
have been prepared by the self- remove text from the Fee Schedule Exchange notes that this pricing is
regulatory organization. The noting that through December 31, 2015, consistent with similar pricing adopted
Commission is publishing this notice to in 2013 by the Consolidated Tape
there would be no charge for the fees for
solicit comments on the proposed rule Association (‘‘CTA’’).10 The Exchange
NYSE Integrated Feed and text noting
change from interested persons. also notes that the OPRA Plan imposes
that the fees would be applicable from a similar charge of $100 per connection
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s January 1, 2016. The proposed change for circuit connections in addition to the
Statement of the Terms of Substance of would provide clarity to subscribers of primary and backup connections.11
the Proposed Rule Change NYSE Integrated Feed. The Exchange notes that NYSE
The Exchange proposes to amend the Integrated Feed is entirely optional. The
fees for NYSE Integrated Feed to 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 74128
Exchange is not required to make NYSE
(January 23, 2015), 80 FR 4951 (January 29, 2015) Integrated Feed available or to offer any
establish a multiple data feed fee. The (SR–NYSE–2015–03) (Notice—NYSE Integrated
proposed rule change is available on the Feed) and 76485 (Nov. 20, 2015), 80 FR 74158 (Nov. specific pricing alternatives to any
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, 27, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–57) (establishing fees for customers, nor is any firm required to
at the principal office of the Exchange, NYSE Integrated Feed). purchase NYSE Integrated Feed. Firms
5 The text of footnote 6 in Exhibit 5 of this
and at the Commission’s Public that do purchase NYSE Integrated Feed
proposed rule change was previously filed under a
Reference Room. separate filing. See SR–NYSE–2016–02 (Proposed
do so for the primary goals of using it
Rule Change to Amend the Fees for NYSE to increase revenues, reduce expenses,
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s OpenBook). and in some instances compete directly
Statement of the Purpose of, and 6 Data vendors currently report a unique Vendor
with the Exchange (including for order
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Account Number for each location at which they flow); those firms are able to determine
Change provide a data feed to a data recipient. The
Exchange considers each Vendor Account Number
In its filing with the Commission, the 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
a location. For example, if a data recipient has five
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5).
self-regulatory organization included Vendor Account Numbers, representing five
statements concerning the purpose of, locations, for the receipt of the NYSE Integrated 10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70010
Feed product, that data recipient will pay the (July 19, 2013), 78 FR 44984 (July 25, 2013) (SR–
Multiple Data Feed fee with respect to three of the CTA/CQ–2013–04).
69 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). five locations. 11 See ‘‘Direct Access Fee,’’ Options Price
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76485 Reporting Authority Fee Schedule Fee Schedule
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
(November 20, 2015), 80 FR 74158 (November 27, PRA Plan [sic] at http://www.opradata.com/pdf/
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–57). fee_schedule.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:33 Jan 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01FEN1.SGM 01FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_5169/page/10.svg)
Document Created: 2016-01-30 01:17:05
Document Modified: 2016-01-30 01:17:05
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 5149 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR