81 FR 51853 - Monosodium Glutamate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 151 (August 5, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 151 (August 5, 2016)
| Page Range | 51853-51855 | |
| FR Document | 2016-18669 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 51853-51855] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-18669] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-992] Monosodium Glutamate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is conducting the first administrative review of the antidumping duty order on monosodium glutamate (``MSG'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period of review (``POR'') May 8, 2014 through October 31, 2015. This review covers 38 manufacturers/exporters (``the companies'') of the subject merchandise. None of these companies have filed a separate rate application (``SRA'') and/or a separate rate certification (``SRC'') to establish its separate rate status. Therefore, the Department preliminarily finds that the companies are part of the PRC-wide entity. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective August 5, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6251 or (202) 482-4956, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 3, 2015, the Department published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on MSG from the PRC.\1\ In response, on November 30, 2015, Ajinomoto North America, Inc. (``Petitioner'' or ``Ajinomoto'') requested a review of 38 companies.\2\ Also on November 20, 2015, Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. and its affiliate, Hulunbeier Northeast Fufeng Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Fufeng'') requested a review.\3\ The Department initiated a review of all 38 companies, which included Fufeng, on January 7, 2016.\4\ On February 8, 2016, Fufeng timely withdrew its request for review.\5\ No party timely submitted an SRA or an SRC.\6\ Thereafter, Petitioner submitted comments on the Department's selection of respondents, encouraging the Department to employ its customary policy to treat companies as a part of the country-wide entity in reviews where no party submits an SRA or SRC.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 67706 (November 3, 2015). \2\ See Letter from Ajinomoto to the Department of Commerce, Re: ``Monosodium Glutamate from China: Request for Administrative Review,'' dated November 30, 2015, at footnote 1 which lists 38 companies for which Ajinomoto sought review. \3\ See Letter from Fufeng to the Department of Commerce, Re: ``Request for the First Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the People's Republic of China,'' dated November 30, 2015. \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 736 (January 7, 2016) (``Initiation Notice''). \5\ See Letter from Fufeng to the Department of Commerce, Re: ``Withdrawal of Review Request: First Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the People's Republic of China,'' dated February 8, 2016. Because the Petitioner's request for review included Fufeng, it was not removed from the administrative review. \6\ Because of tolling, the deadline for SRAs and SRCs was extended four business days until February 12, 2016. See Memorandum from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Re: ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm `Jonas,' '' dated January 27, 2016. \7\ See Letter from Ajinomoto to the Department of Commerce, Re: ``MSG from China: Comments on Respondent Selection,'' dated February 29, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by this order is MSG, whether or not blended or in solution with other products. Specifically, MSG that has been blended or is in solution with other product(s) is included in this scope when the resulting mix contains 15 percent or more of MSG by dry weight. Products with which MSG may be blended include, but are not limited to, salts, sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and various seasonings. Further, MSG is included in this order regardless of physical form (including, but not limited to, in monohydrate or anhydrous form, or as substrates, solutions, dry powders of any particle size, or unfinished forms such as MSG slurry), end-use application, or packaging. MSG in monohydrate form has a molecular formula of C5H8NO4Na-H2 O, a Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) registry number of 6106-04-3, and a Unique Ingredient Identifier (UNII) number of W81N5U6R6U. MSG in anhydrous form has a molecular formula of C5H8NO4Na, a CAS registry number of l42-47-2, and a UNII number of C3C196L9FG. Merchandise covered by the scope of this order is currently [[Page 51854]] classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') at subheading 2922.42.10.00. Merchandise subject to the order may also enter under HTS subheadings 2922.42.50.00, 2103.90.72.00, 2103.90.74.00, 2103.90.78.00, 2103.90.80.00, and 2103.90.90.91. The tariff classifications, CAS registry numbers, and UNII numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope is dispositive.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See Monosodium Glutamate From the People's Republic of China: Second Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Order, 80 FR 487 (January 6, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), and 19 CFR 351.213.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ For a complete description of the methodology underlying this preliminary result, see ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Monosodium Glutamate from the People's Republic of China; 2014- 2015,'' at 3-4 (dated concurrently with this notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department's policy regarding conditional review of the PRC- wide entity applies to this administrative review.\10\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department preliminarily determines that the 38 companies subject to review are part of the PRC-wide entity. None of the 38 companies filed an SRA or an SRC. No review has been requested for the PRC-wide entity. Therefore, the Department preliminarily determines that these companies have not demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate status and are part of the PRC-wide entity. The PRC-wide entity rate is 40.41 percent.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Monosodium Glutamate From the People's Republic of China: Second Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Amended Antidumping Duty Order, 80 FR 487 (January 6, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), within 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\12\ ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit in Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\13\ Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a brief summary of the argument, and a table of authorities.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \13\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). \14\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Department within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\15\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) The number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\16\ The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c) \16\ See 19 CFR 310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise covered by this review.\17\ We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the companies under review that we determine in the final results to be part of the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate of 40.41 percent. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this review in the Federal Register.\18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \18\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For companies that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter- specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 40.41 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4). [[Page 51855]] Dated: August 1, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Non-Market Economy Country Status 5. PRC-Wide Entity [FR Doc. 2016-18669 Filed 8-4-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices 51853
All requests must be filed DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ‘‘Fufeng’’) requested a review.3 The
electronically in Enforcement and Department initiated a review of all 38
Compliance’s Antidumping and International Trade Administration companies, which included Fufeng, on
Countervailing Duty Centralized January 7, 2016.4 On February 8, 2016,
[A–570–992]
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) Fufeng timely withdrew its request for
on Enforcement and Compliance’s Monosodium Glutamate From the review.5 No party timely submitted an
ACCESS Web site at http:// People’s Republic of China: SRA or an SRC.6 Thereafter, Petitioner
access.trade.gov.4 Further, in Preliminary Results of the submitted comments on the
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), Antidumping Duty Administrative Department’s selection of respondents,
Review; 2014–2015 encouraging the Department to employ
a copy of each request must be served
its customary policy to treat companies
on the petitioner and each exporter or
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, as a part of the country-wide entity in
producer specified in the request. reviews where no party submits an SRA
International Trade Administration,
The Department will publish in the Department of Commerce. or SRC.7
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Scope of the Order
of Administrative Review of (the ‘‘Department’’) is conducting the
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty first administrative review of the The product covered by this order is
Order, Finding, or Suspended antidumping duty order on MSG, whether or not blended or in
Investigation’’ for requests received by monosodium glutamate (‘‘MSG’’) from solution with other products.
the last day of August 2016. If the Specifically, MSG that has been blended
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
Department does not receive, by the last or is in solution with other product(s) is
covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
included in this scope when the
day of August 2016, a request for review May 8, 2014 through October 31, 2015.
resulting mix contains 15 percent or
of entries covered by an order, finding, This review covers 38 manufacturers/
more of MSG by dry weight. Products
or suspended investigation listed in this exporters (‘‘the companies’’) of the
with which MSG may be blended
notice and for the period identified subject merchandise. None of these
include, but are not limited to, salts,
above, the Department will instruct CBP companies have filed a separate rate
sugars, starches, maltodextrins, and
to assess antidumping or countervailing application (‘‘SRA’’) and/or a separate
various seasonings. Further, MSG is
duties on those entries at a rate equal to rate certification (‘‘SRC’’) to establish its
included in this order regardless of
the cash deposit of (or bond for) separate rate status. Therefore, the physical form (including, but not
estimated antidumping or Department preliminarily finds that the limited to, in monohydrate or
countervailing duties required on those companies are part of the PRC-wide anhydrous form, or as substrates,
entries at the time of entry, or entity. We invite interested parties to solutions, dry powders of any particle
withdrawal from warehouse, for comment on these preliminary results. size, or unfinished forms such as MSG
consumption and to continue to collect DATES: Effective August 5, 2016. slurry), end-use application, or
the cash deposit previously ordered. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: packaging. MSG in monohydrate form
Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, has a molecular formula of
For the first administrative review of
AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, C5H8NO4Na-H2O, a Chemical Abstract
any order, there will be no assessment
Enforcement and Compliance, Service (CAS) registry number of 6106–
of antidumping or countervailing duties 04–3, and a Unique Ingredient Identifier
International Trade Administration,
on entries of subject merchandise Department of Commerce, 14th Street (UNII) number of W81N5U6R6U. MSG
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, and Constitution Avenue NW., in anhydrous form has a molecular
for consumption during the relevant Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) formula of C5H8NO4Na, a CAS registry
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 482–6251 or (202) 482–4956, number of l42–47–2, and a UNII number
the order, if such a gap period is respectively. of C3C196L9FG. Merchandise covered
applicable to the period of review. by the scope of this order is currently
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the Background 3 See Letter from Fufeng to the Department of
Commerce, Re: ‘‘Request for the First
international trading community. On November 3, 2015, the Department Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Dated: July 28, 2016. published a notice of opportunity to Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated November 30, 2015.
Christian Marsh, request an administrative review of the 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
antidumping duty order on MSG from Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
the PRC.1 In response, on November 30, 736 (January 7, 2016) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
2015, Ajinomoto North America, Inc. 5 See Letter from Fufeng to the Department of
[FR Doc. 2016–18540 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am] Commerce, Re: ‘‘Withdrawal of Review Request:
(‘‘Petitioner’’ or ‘‘Ajinomoto’’) requested
First Administrative Review of the Antidumping
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P a review of 38 companies.2 Also on Duty Order on Monosodium Glutamate from the
November 20, 2015, Neimenggu Fufeng People’s Republic of China,’’ dated February 8,
Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. and its 2016. Because the Petitioner’s request for review
affiliate, Hulunbeier Northeast Fufeng included Fufeng, it was not removed from the
administrative review.
Biotechnologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, 6 Because of tolling, the deadline for SRAs and
SRCs was extended four business days until
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
February 12, 2016. See Memorandum from Ron
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 67706 Enforcement and Compliance, Re: ‘‘Tolling of
(November 3, 2015). Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the
2 See Letter from Ajinomoto to the Department of Government Closure during Snowstorm ‘Jonas,’ ’’
4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Commerce, Re: ‘‘Monosodium Glutamate from dated January 27, 2016.
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 7 See Letter from Ajinomoto to the Department of
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR November 30, 2015, at footnote 1 which lists 38 Commerce, Re: ‘‘MSG from China: Comments on
39263 (July 6, 2011). companies for which Ajinomoto sought review. Respondent Selection,’’ dated February 29, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Aug 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_52004/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices 51855
Dated: August 1, 2016. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE automatically initiate and conduct a
Christian Marsh, review to determine whether revocation
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping International Trade Administration of a countervailing or antidumping duty
and Countervailing Duty Operations. order or termination of an investigation
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
Appendix I Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of the Act would be likely to lead to
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Sunset Reviews continuation or recurrence of dumping
Decision Memorandum or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
1. Summary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, may be) and of material injury.
2. Background International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for
3. Scope of the Order
September 2016
4. Non-Market Economy Country Status Background
5. PRC-Wide Entity The following Sunset Reviews are
Every five years, pursuant to section
[FR Doc. 2016–18669 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am] 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as scheduled for initiation in September
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 2016 and will appear in that month’s
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset
International Trade Commission Review (‘‘Sunset Review’’).
Department Contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from China (A–570–815) (4th Review) .......................................... David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
Sulfanilic Acid from India (A–533–806) (4th Review) ............................................ David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–588–850) David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
(Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (3rd Review).
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–588–851) David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
(Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan (3rd Review).
Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (A–485–805) David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
(Under 41⁄2 Inches) from Romania (3rd Review).
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Sulfanilic Acid from India (C–533–807) (4th Review) ............................................ David Goldberger: (202) 482–4136.
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in
September 2016.
The Department’s procedures for the This notice is not required by statute aluminum extrusions from the People’s
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth but is published as a service to the Republic of China (PRC) would be likely
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of international trading community. to lead to continuation or recurrence of
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Dated: July 28, 2016. dumping at the levels indicated in the
Reviews provides further information Christian Marsh,
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
regarding what is required of all parties section of this notice.
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
to participate in Sunset Reviews. and Countervailing Duty Operations. DATES: Effective August 5, 2016.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the [FR Doc. 2016–18537 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Department will maintain and make BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD
available a service list for these Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
proceedings. To facilitate the timely Compliance, International Trade
preparation of the service list(s), it is DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Administration, U.S. Department of
requested that those seeking recognition Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
as interested parties to a proceeding International Trade Administration Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
contact the Department in writing telephone: (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–
within 10 days of the publication of the [A–570–967] 0649, respectively.
Notice of Initiation. Aluminum Extrusions From the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Please note that if the Department People’s Republic of China: Final Background
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate Results of Expedited First Sunset
from a member of the domestic industry On May 26, 2011, the Department
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order published the notice of the antidumping
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
the review will continue. Thereafter, AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, duty order on aluminum extrusions
any interested party wishing to International Trade Administration, from the PRC.1 On April 1, 2016, the
participate in the Sunset Review must Department of Commerce. Department published the notice of
initiation of the first sunset review of
provide substantive comments in SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
response to the notice of initiation no review, the Department of Commerce 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s
later than 30 days after the date of (the Department) finds that revocation Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR
initiation. of the antidumping duty order on 30650 (May 26, 2011) (AD Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Aug 04, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM 05AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_52004/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-05 06:44:04
Document Modified: 2016-08-05 06:44:04
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective August 5, 2016. | |
| Contact | Kathryn Wallace or Alexander Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6251 or (202) 482-4956, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 51853 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR