81_FR_52043 81 FR 51892 - Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc; Analysis To Aid Public Comment

81 FR 51892 - Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc; Analysis To Aid Public Comment

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 151 (August 5, 2016)

Page Range51892-51899
FR Document2016-18562

The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent orders-- embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle these allegations.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51892-51899]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[File No. 151 0196]


Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc; Analysis To 
Aid Public Comment

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Proposed consent agreement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged 
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition. 
The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the 
allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent orders--
embodied in the consent agreement--that would settle these allegations.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 29, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/tevaallerganconsent online or on paper, 
by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section

[[Page 51893]]

below. Write ``In the Matter of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and 
Allergan plc, File No. 151-0196, C-4589--Consent Agreement'' on your 
comment and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/tevaallerganconsent by following the 
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment 
on paper, write ``In the Matter of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 
and Allergan plc, File No. 151-0196, C-4589--Consent Agreement'' on 
your comment and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the 
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 
20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade 
Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th 
Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Moiseyev (202-326-3106), 
Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20580.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal 
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, 
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement 
containing consent orders to cease and desist, having been filed with 
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been 
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The 
following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the 
consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic 
copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained 
from the FTC Home Page (for July 27, 2016), on the World Wide Web, at 
http://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm.
    You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to 
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before August 29, 2016. 
Write ``In the Matter of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and 
Allergan plc, File No. 151-0196, C-4589--Consent Agreement'' on your 
comment. Your comment--including your name and your state--will be 
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the 
extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the 
Commission tries to remove individuals' home contact information from 
comments before placing them on the Commission Web site.
    Because your comment will be made public, you are solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number, 
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification 
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial 
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive health information, like medical records or other 
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not 
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information 
which . . . is privileged or confidential,'' as discussed in Section 
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive 
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, 
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
    If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential 
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for 
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained 
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept 
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole 
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the 
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In particular, the written request for confidential 
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and 
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions 
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule 
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to 
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit 
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your 
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/tevaallerganconsent by following the instructions on the web-based 
form. If this Notice appears at http://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you 
also may file a comment through that Web site.
    If you file your comment on paper, write ``In the Matter of Teva 
Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc, File No. 151-0196, C-
4589--Consent Agreement'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail 
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office 
of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC-5610 (Annex D), 
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: 
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 
400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC. If 
possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or 
overnight service.
    Visit the Commission Web site at http://www.ftc.gov to read this 
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws 
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public 
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The 
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that 
it receives on or before August 29, 2016. You can find more 
information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in 
the Commission's privacy policy, at http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.

Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment

    The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted, subject 
to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (``Consent 
Agreement'') from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (``Teva'') and 
Allergan plc (``Allergan''), which is designed to remedy the 
anticompetitive effects resulting from Teva's proposed acquisition of 
Allergan's generic pharmaceutical business. The proposed Consent 
Agreement requires the parties (1) to divest rights and assets related 
to pharmaceutical markets for one or more strengths of seventy-nine 
pharmaceutical products and (2) provide certain Teva active 
pharmaceutical ingredient (``API'') customers that market one or more 
of fifteen pharmaceutical products with the option to enter into long-
term API supply contracts.
    The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record 
for thirty days for receipt of comments from interested persons. 
Comments received during this period will become part of the public 
record. After thirty days, the Commission will again evaluate the 
proposed Consent Agreement, along with the comments received, to make a 
final decision as to whether it should withdraw from the proposed 
Consent Agreement or make final the Decision and Order (``Order'').
    On July 26, 2015, Teva proposed to acquire Allergan's generic 
pharmaceutical business for approximately $40.5 billion. The Commission 
alleges in its Complaint that the proposed acquisition, if consummated, 
would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15

[[Page 51894]]

U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as 
amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by lessening current or future competition in 
pharmaceutical markets for one or more strengths of ninety-four 
pharmaceutical products in the United States. The proposed Consent 
Agreement will remedy the alleged violations by preserving the 
competition that otherwise would be eliminated by the proposed 
acquisition.

I. The Products and Structure of the Markets

a. Horizontal Competition in Pharmaceutical Markets

    Generic drugs are chemically and therapeutically equivalent to 
branded drugs. When a physician prescribes a particular branded drug, a 
pharmacy may only dispense that branded drug or its generic equivalent, 
which is ``AB-rated'' to the branded product. State laws permit or 
require pharmacies to automatically substitute the generic equivalent 
for the prescribed branded drug unless a physician expressly states not 
to do so.
    The 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act provides the statutory framework for the 
Food and Drug Administration (``FDA'') to approve generic drugs. Under 
Hatch-Waxman, a generic drug manufacturer can rely on an already-
approved branded drug's safety and efficacy data in its own 
application--called an Abbreviated New Drug Application (``ANDA'')--to 
the FDA, substantially lowering the research and development cost of 
the generic drug. Upon FDA approval, a generic drug typically launches 
at a discount to the branded drug's price. When there is only one 
generic drug on the market, the branded drug usually competes with the 
generic drug on price, either directly or through an authorized generic 
version. As subsequent generic drugs launch, a generic-only market 
typically forms, with competition among generics driving pricing. When 
multiple generic drugs are available, customers usually substitute 
between the generics only--not the branded drug--and solicit bids 
exclusively from generic drug suppliers.
    Teva's proposed acquisition of Allergan's generic pharmaceutical 
business will lessen current or future competition by reducing the 
number of current or future suppliers in the pharmaceutical markets for 
one or more strengths of seventy-nine pharmaceutical products. Those 
markets fall into three categories: (1) Current competition between 
Teva and Allergan; (2) future competition between Teva and Allergan in 
an existing generic market; and (3) future competition between Teva and 
Allergan in a future generic market (i.e., the generic market has not 
yet formed and only the branded drug is on the market). Absent a 
remedy, the proposed acquisition would reduce the number of suppliers 
in each market as indicated below.
 Current Competition Between Teva and Allergan, 2-to-1 Supplier 
Consolidation
[cir] Armodafinil Oral Tablet, 200 mg
[cir] Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol Oral Tablet, 0.025/0.1 mg then 
0.025/0.125 mg then 0.025/0.15 mg (AB-rated to Cyclessa)
[cir] Estazolam Oral Tablet, 1 mg
[cir] Estazolam Oral Tablet, 2 mg
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Ethynodiol Diacetate Oral Tablet, 0.035/1mg 
(AB-rated to Demulen 1/35)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.035/1mg (AB-rated 
to Tri-Norinyl 28-Day)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral 
Tablet, 0.02/0.03/0.035/1/1/1 mg (AB-rated to Estrostep FE)
[cir] Metoclopramide HCl Oral Tablet, 5 mg
[cir] Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule, 50 mg
[cir] Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule, 100 mg
 Current Competition Between Teva and Allergan, 3-to-2 Supplier 
Consolidation
[cir] Budesonide Inhalation Suspension, 0.25 mg/2 mL
[cir] Budesonide Inhalation Suspension, 0.5 mg/2 mL
[cir] Clarithromycin Extended Release Oral Tablet, 500 mg
[cir] Clonidine HCl Extended Release Transdermal Film, 0.1 mg/24 hr
[cir] Clonidine HCl Extended Release Transdermal Film, 0.2 mg/24 hr
[cir] Clonidine HCl Extended Release Transdermal Film, 0.3 mg/24 hr
[cir] Cyclosporine Oral Solution, 100 mg/mL
[cir] Desmopressin Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.1 mg
[cir] Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol/Ethinyl Estradiol Oral Tablet, 
0.15/0.02 mg/0.01 mg (AB-rated to Mircette)
[cir] Disopyramide Phosphate Oral Capsule, 100 mg
[cir] Disopyramide Phosphate Oral Capsule, 150 mg
[cir] Estradiol Oral Tablet, 0.5 mg
[cir] Estradiol Oral Tablet, 1 mg
[cir] Estradiol Oral Tablet, 2 mg
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.02/0.1mg (AB-
rated to Levlite-28)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet 0.03/0.04/0.03/0.05/
0.075/0.125 mg (AB-rated to Triphasil-28)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.035/0.5mg (AB-
rated to Modicon 28)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.03/0.3mg (AB-rated to 
Lo/Ovral-28)
[cir] Fludarabine Lyopholized Vial Injection, 50 mg
[cir] Fluocinonide Topical Cream, 0.05%
[cir] Flutamide Oral Capsule, 125 mg
[cir] Griseofulvin Microcrystalline Oral Liquid Suspension, 125 mg/5 mL
[cir] Metoclopramide HCl Oral Tablet, 10 mg
[cir] Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab, 15 mg
[cir] Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab, 30 mg
[cir] Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab, 45 mg
[cir] Nabumetone Oral Tablet, 500 mg
[cir] Nabumetone Oral Tablet, 750 mg
[cir] Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 50 mg
[cir] Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 75 mg
[cir] Tamoxifen Citrate Oral Tablet, 10 mg
[cir] Tamoxifen Citrate Oral Tablet, 20 mg
[cir] Trimethoprim Oral Tablet, 100 mg
 Current Competition Between Teva and Allergan, 4-to-3 Supplier 
Consolidation
[cir] Acitretin Oral Capsule, 17.5 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 5 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 15 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 20 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Amphetamine Aspartate/Amphetamine Sulfate/Dextroamphetamine 
Saccharate/

[[Page 51895]]

Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral Capsule, 30 mg
[cir] Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 10/100 mg
[cir] Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 25/100 mg
[cir] Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 25/250 mg
[cir] Cyclosporine Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Cyclosporine Oral Capsule, 100 mg
[cir] Desmopressin Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.2 mg
[cir] Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended Release Oral Capsule, 5 mg
[cir] Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended Release Oral Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended Release Oral Capsule, 20 mg
[cir] Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended Release Oral Capsule, 5 mg
[cir] Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended Release Oral Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended Release Oral Capsule, 15 mg
[cir] Diazepam Oral Tablet, 2 mg
[cir] Diazepam Oral Tablet, 5 mg
[cir] Diazepam Oral Tablet, 10 mg
[cir] Epirubicin Injection Vial 50 mg/25 mL
[cir] Epirubicin Injection Vial 200 mg/100 mL
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.02/0.01/0.1mg 
(AB-rated to Lo Seasonique)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.02/1mg 
(AB-rated to Loestrin 21 1/20)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.03/1.5mg 
(AB-rated to Loestrin 21 1.5/30)
[cir] Glyburide/Metformin HC1 Oral Tablet, 1.25/250 mg
[cir] Glyburide/Metformin HCl Oral Tablet, 2.5/500 mg
[cir] Glyburide/Metformin HCl Oral Tablet, 5/500 mg
[cir] Hydroxyzine Pamoate Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Hydroxyzine Pamoate Oral Capsule, 50 mg
[cir] Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution, 0.0103%
[cir] Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution, 0.0210%
[cir] Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution, 0.042%
[cir] Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 50 mg
[cir] Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 75 mg
[cir] Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 100 mg
[cir] Nitrofurantoin Oral Capsules, 50 mg
[cir] Nitrofurantoin Oral Capsules, 100 mg
[cir] Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/mL 20 mL vial
[cir] Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/mL 50 mL vial
[cir] Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/mL 100 mL vial
[cir] Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 10 mg
[cir] Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 20 mg
[cir] Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 40 mg
[cir] Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 80 mg
 Current Competition Between Teva and Allergan, 5-to-4 Supplier 
Consolidation
[cir] Acitretin Oral Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Acitretin Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Alendronate Sodium Oral Tablet, 35 mg
[cir] Buspirone HCl Oral Tablet, 15 mg
[cir] Clozapine Oral Tablet, 25 mg
[cir] Clozapine Oral Tablet, 100 mg
[cir] Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol Oral Tablet, 3/0.03 mg (AB-rated 
to Yasmin-28)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.02/0.1 mg (AB-
rated to Alesse-28)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.03/0.15 mg (AB-
rated to Nordette)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.03/0.01/0.15 mg 
(AB-rated to Seasonique)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral 
Tablet, 0.02/1 mg (AB-rated to Loestrin FE 1/20)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral 
Tablet, 0.03/1.5 mg (AB-rated to Loestrin FE 1.5/30)
[cir] Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.35 mg (AB-rated to Micronor 28)
[cir] Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.35 mg (AB-rated to Nor-QD)
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in an Existing 
Generic Market, 3-to-2 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Budesonide Inhalation Suspension, 1 mg/2 mL
[cir] Fluocinonide Cream Emulsified Base 0.05%
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Capsule, 20 mg
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Capsule, 30 mg
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Capsule, 40 mg
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in an Existing 
Generic Market, 4-to-3 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Aspirin/Dipyridamole Extended Release Oral Capsule 25/200 mg
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in an Existing 
Generic Market, 5-to-4 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin Phosphate Gel, 5%/1%
[cir] Clozapine Oral Tablet, 200 mg
[cir] Methotrexate Injection, 25 mg/mL in 2 mL vial
[cir] Methotrexate Injection, 25 mg/mL in 10 mL vial
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Tablet, 18 mg
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Tablet, 27 mg
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Tablet, 36 mg
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Tablet, 54 mg
[cir] Tobramycin Inhalant Solution, 300 mg/5 mL
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in a Future 
Generic Market, 2-to-1 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Methylphenidate HCl Extended Release Capsule, 10 mg
[cir] Ramelteon Tablet, 8 mg
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in a Future 
Generic Market, 3-to-2 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal Film, 12/3 mg
[cir] Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal Film, 4/1 mg
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Etonogestrel Vaginal Ring 0.015mg/24hr; 
0.012mg/24hr
[cir] NAB Paclitaxel Injectable Suspension, 100 mg/vial
[cir] Phentermine HCl/Topiramate Extended Release Capsule, 11.25/69 mg
[cir] Phentermine HCl/Topiramate Extended Release Capsule, 15/92 mg
[cir] Phentermine HCl/Topiramate Extended Release Capsule, 3.75/23 mg
[cir] Phentermine HCl/Topiramate Extended Release Capsule, 7.5/46 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 1 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 2 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 3 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 4 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 6 mg
[cir] Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 8 mg
 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in a Future 
Generic Market, 4-to-3 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal Film, 2/0.5 mg
[cir] Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal Film, 8/2 mg
[cir] Dienogest/Estradiol Valerate and Estradiol Valerate Oral Tablet, 
3 mg, 2/2 mg, 3/2 mg, 1 mg (AB-rated to Natazia)
[cir] Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral Tablet, 0.02/0.15 mg; 
0.025/0.15 mg; 0.03 mg/0.15 mg; 0.01 mg (AB-rated to Quartette)
[cir] Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/10 mg
[cir] Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/20 mg
[cir] Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/40 mg
[cir] Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/80 mg

[[Page 51896]]

[cir] Imiquimod Topical Cream, 3.75%
[cir] Four pipeline products \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Teva's and Allergan's independent development projects for 
two overlapping pharmaceutical products are not public, and their 
existence is confidential business information. But for the proposed 
acquisition, certain strengths of the Teva and Allergan products 
would likely compete in four future markets. To preserve the 
confidentiality of these development programs, the specific future 
markets in which these products would compete are not identified in 
this document, and references to these products have been redacted 
from the public version of the Complaint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Future Competition Between Teva and Allergan in a Future 
Generic Market, 5-to-4 Supplier Consolidation
[cir] Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended Release Oral Capsule, 25 mg
[cir] Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended Release Oral Capsule, 35 mg
[cir] Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 100 mcg
[cir] Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 200 mcg
[cir] Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 400 mcg
[cir] Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 600 mcg
[cir] Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 800 mcg
[cir] Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended Release Tablet, 500/5 mg
[cir] Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended Release Tablet, 1000/2.5 mg
[cir] Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended Release Tablet, 1000/5 mg

b. API Supply and Competition in Pharmaceutical Markets

    APIs are central inputs in the manufacture of finished dose form 
pharmaceutical products. API supply sources must be designated in a 
drug's FDA marketing authorization. Switching to a non-designated API 
source requires a drug maker to supplement its New Drug Application or 
ANDA, a process that can take as long as two years or even more. 
Consequently, a generic drug manufacturer's API supply options are 
limited to the sources qualified under its ANDA. If only one API 
supplier is qualified under an ANDA, the ANDA holder has no immediate 
recourse if its designated API supplier elects to raise its prices or 
refuse to supply.
    Teva is world's largest API supplier and supplies API to Allergan's 
competitors in a number of generic markets. The proposed acquisition 
may lessen current or future competition in fifteen pharmaceutical 
products markets by creating the incentive and ability for Teva to 
foreclose rival suppliers of fifteen newly acquired Allergan 
pharmaceutical products by withholding supply of the following eight 
Teva API products:
     Betamethasone dipropionate API;
     Betamethasone valerate API;
     Clobetasol propionate API;
     Desonide API;
     Fluocinolone API;
     Fluorouracil API;
     Probenecid API; and
     Triamcinolone acetonide API.
    The fifteen downstream pharmaceutical markets in which competition 
would be lessened as a result of the acquisition are:
     Betamethasone dipropionate augmented ointment, 0.05%;
     Betamethasone dipropionate cream, 0.05%;
     Betamethasone dipropionate lotion, 0.05%;
     Betamethasone dipropionate ointment, 0.05%;
     Betamethasone valerate cream, 0.1%;
     Betamethasone valerate ointment, 0.1%;
     Clobetasol propionate shampoo, 0.05%;
     Clobetasol propionate ointment, 0.05%;
     Desonide cream, 0.05%;
     Probenecid tablets, 500 mg;
     Probenecid/colchicine tablets, 500 mg/0.5 mg;
     Nystatin/triamcinolone acetonide cream, 100,000 units/gm/
0.1%;
     Nystatin/triamcinolone acetonide ointment, 100,000 units/
gm/0.1%; and
     Two pipeline products.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Allergan has not yet made public the development of two 
pharmaceutical products that would likely compete with products for 
which Teva supplies API. To preserve the confidentiality of these 
Allergan development programs, the specific markets in which these 
likely future products would compete are not identified in this 
document, and references to these products have been redacted from 
the public version of the Complaint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Entry

    Entry into these pharmaceutical markets would not be timely, 
likely, or sufficient in magnitude, character, and scope to deter or 
counteract the anticompetitive effects of the proposed acquisition. 
Introducing generic pharmaceutical products is costly and lengthy due 
to drug development times and regulatory requirements, including 
approval by the FDA. Additionally, it can take up to two years for an 
API manufacturer to qualify as a new API supplier for a generic 
pharmaceutical product, leaving the generic pharmaceutical product with 
no alternative to its existing qualified API supplier or suppliers.

III. Effects

    The proposed acquisition likely would cause significant 
anticompetitive harm by eliminating current or future competition in 
markets for one or more strengths of seventy-nine pharmaceutical 
products where the parties currently sell or are developing generic 
drugs. In each of these markets, Teva and Allergan are two of a limited 
number of current or likely future suppliers in the United States. 
Customers and competitors have observed that the price of generic 
pharmaceutical products decreases with new entry even after several 
suppliers have entered the market. Removal of an independent generic 
pharmaceutical supplier from the relevant markets in which Teva and 
Allergan currently compete would result in significantly higher prices 
post-acquisition. Similarly, the elimination of a future independent 
competitor would prevent the price decreases that are likely to result 
from the firm's entry. Thus, absent a remedy, the proposed acquisition 
would likely result in significantly higher prices for these generic 
drugs.
    Additionally, the proposed acquisition likely would cause 
competitive harm in markets for fifteen pharmaceutical products in 
which Teva supplies API for a generic pharmaceutical product that 
currently competes or will compete in the near future with an Allergan 
generic pharmaceutical product. Those generic pharmaceutical markets 
already have or will have a limited number of competitors, some of 
which are supplied API by Teva. Teva has the ability to foreclose these 
competitors by denying them API from their only approved source. Post-
acquisition, Teva would have the incentive to foreclose one or more 
competitors because the lost API sales would be less than the recouped 
profits on additional sales gained from the foreclosed competitor(s) 
and the increased prices. Such foreclosure would harm consumers because 
market concentration and price would result in significantly higher 
prices.

IV. The Consent Agreement

    The remedy reflected in the proposed Consent Agreement would 
eliminate the likely anticompetitive effects of the proposed 
acquisition by requiring the parties to divest rights and assets 
related to the pharmaceutical products in each relevant market. The 
acquirers are: Mayne Pharma Group Ltd. (``Mayne''), Impax Laboratories, 
Inc. (``Impax''), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. (``Dr. Reddy's''), 
Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (``Sagent''), Cipla Limited (``Cipla''), 
Zydus Worldwide DMCC (``Zydus''), Mikah Pharma LLC (``Mikah''), Perrigo 
Pharma International D.A.C. (``Perrigo''), Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 
(``Aurobindo''), Prasco LLC (``Prasco''), and 3M Company (``3M'') 
(collectively, the ``Acquirers''). The parties must

[[Page 51897]]

divest the products no later than ten days after the acquisition.
    The Commission's goal in evaluating possible acquirers of divested 
assets is to maintain the competitive environment that existed prior to 
the acquisition. The Commission thoroughly reviewed the assets to be 
divested, the transitional services to be provided by Teva, and the 
capabilities and plans of each Acquirer. The interim monitors, who will 
oversee the divestiture process, have worked closely with Commission 
staff to ensure the viability of the divestiture and anticipate 
logistical and technical challenges. Additionally, Teva--in conjunction 
with the Acquirers, Allergan, and interim monitors--has prepared a 
comprehensive divestiture plan to guide the process of transferring the 
divested products to their new proposed owners. If the Commission 
determines that an Acquirer is not acceptable, or that the manner of 
the divestitures is not acceptable, the parties must unwind the sale or 
release of rights to that Acquirer and divest the products to a 
Commission-approved acquirer within six months of the date the Order 
becomes final. In that circumstance, the Commission may appoint a 
trustee to divest the products if the parties fail to divest the 
products as required.
    The proposed Consent Agreement contains provisions to help ensure 
the divestitures are successful. The parties must take all action to 
maintain the economic viability, marketability, and competitiveness of 
the divestiture products until they are divested. The parties must 
provide transitional services to the Acquirers to assist them in 
establishing independent manufacturing capabilities. These transitional 
services include technical assistance to manufacture the divestiture 
products in substantially the same manner and quality employed or 
achieved by the parties, as well as advice and training from 
knowledgeable employees. The goal of the transitional services is to 
ensure that the acquirers will be able to operate independently of the 
parties in the manufacture and sale of the divested products. The 
proposed Consent Agreement also requires the parties to supply product 
to the Acquirers so that the Acquirers can market them independently 
while the parties transfer the associated technology to the production 
facilities of the Acquirer or its chosen third-party manufacturer(s). 
The Consent Agreement allows sufficient time to complete the 
manufacturing transfers, and for products in development, to gain FDA 
approval before completing manufacturing transfers. To ensure that the 
buyers of divestiture products for which Teva or Allergan supply API 
will have access to adequate supplies of reasonably priced API until 
they are able to qualify alternative suppliers, the proposed Consent 
Agreement requires Teva to supply API for up to four years after 
closing at prices not to exceed those set forth in binding letters of 
intent, recently executed by Teva and the buyers. Nothing in the 
Consent Agreement precludes the buyers from sourcing other divestiture 
product inputs from Teva on a negotiated basis.
    In addition, to address the anticompetitive effects likely to arise 
in the fifteen pharmaceutical markets where Teva supplies API to 
Allergan competitors, the Consent Agreement requires Teva to give API 
customers in those markets the option of entering into long-term API 
supply contracts. Teva must notify each affected API customer of the 
option to enter a contract within ten days of consummating the proposed 
acquisition, and such customers may exercise their options at any point 
up to three years after the date of the Consent Agreement. Any such API 
supply contracts executed pursuant to the option shall be renewable for 
up three years after the date of the Consent Agreement, which will give 
the customers sufficient time to qualify alternative API suppliers if 
they wish to do so.
    The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the 
proposed Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an 
official interpretation of the proposed Order or to modify its terms in 
any way.

Statement of the Federal Trade Commission in the Matter of Teva 
Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc

    The Commission has accepted a proposed consent order in connection 
with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.'s proposed acquisition of the 
generic pharmaceutical business of Allergan plc. We believe the consent 
order remedies the anticompetitive effects that would otherwise likely 
result from this transaction by requiring the divestiture of nearly 80 
drug products to buyers that appear well positioned to replicate the 
competition that would have occurred absent the merger. The consent 
order includes a number of safeguards to help achieve our remedial 
goals.
    Both Teva and Allergan are global pharmaceutical companies that are 
among the largest suppliers of generic pharmaceuticals in the United 
States. Teva is currently the largest generic drug company in the 
United States, with an overall generic market share of approximately 
13%; Allergan is third, accounting for approximately 9% of generic 
sales.\1\ Although this merger combines two large sellers of generic 
drugs, the generic pharmaceutical industry as a whole remains 
relatively unconcentrated. Over two hundred firms sell generic drugs in 
the United States and the five largest suppliers account only for about 
half of overall generic sales. Following this transaction, the combined 
firm will likely have a 22% share of industry-wide sales across all 
generic product markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This market share data is based on 2014 IMS gross sales 
data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Despite the industry's relatively low concentration, the Commission 
appreciates that the price, quality, and availability of generic 
pharmaceutical products have a significant impact on American 
consumers' daily lives and on healthcare costs nationwide. We therefore 
looked closely at every possible aspect of this transaction that could 
result in competitive harm. We examined not only particular product 
overlaps but also whether the combination between Teva and Allergan 
would result in other adverse consequences to competition. Our 
comprehensive investigation included the review of extensive documents 
from the merging parties and other industry players as well as 
interviews with dozens of customers and more than 50 competitors. We 
concluded that the substantial divestitures required by the consent 
order resolve the competitive concerns resulting from the transaction.

The Complaint and Remedy

    As detailed in our complaint, we have reason to believe that, 
absent a remedy, the transaction would likely substantially reduce 
competition in 79 markets for pharmaceutical products, including oral 
contraceptives, steroidal medications, mental health drugs, and many 
other products. These markets include individual strengths of 
pharmaceutical products where Teva and Allergan currently offer 
competing products as well as products where there would likely be 
future competition absent the merger because one or both of the parties 
are developing competing products.\2\ To remedy the likely

[[Page 51898]]

anticompetitive effects in each of the relevant markets, the consent 
order requires the divestiture of the products and related assets to 
specific acquirers that the Commission has closely vetted and approved. 
Where at least one dosage strength raised a competitive concern, we 
required Teva to divest all strengths. These divestitures, and the 
other relief contained in the proposed consent order, are designed to 
maintain competition in the relevant markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In addition to selling finished pharmaceutical products, 
Teva and Allergan also sell active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) 
to many third-party drug manufacturers, including parties that will 
now compete with the merged entity. Where the number of competitors 
in the finished product market is limited, the Commission determined 
that this vertical relationship could raise competitive concerns in 
markets for finished drug products by creating the incentive and 
ability for Teva to raise prices or withhold supply where third 
parties source from the merged firm. To address these concerns, the 
order requires Teva to provide affected customers with the option of 
entering into long-term API supply contracts to ensure that they 
have an adequate supply of API until they are able to qualify 
alternative suppliers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In settling this case, we rely on the Commission's extensive 
experience with divestitures in the pharmaceutical industry, including 
prior divestitures involving Teva and Allergan and have structured the 
divestitures in a way to minimize potential risks. This includes 
breaking the divested products into smaller packages to ease the load 
on any single buyer and requiring Teva to divest the easier-to-divest 
product of the overlapping products whenever possible. We also 
undertook an extensive review process to ensure that the divestiture 
buyers are acceptable and have the resources they need to compete 
successfully in the relevant markets. The buyers have identified third-
party contract research organizations or contract manufacturers they 
intend to use and provided us with executed contracts. We involved 
interim monitors early in the divestiture negotiation process to ensure 
a smooth divestiture process and harmonize Teva's technological 
transfer plans with those of the acquirors of the divested assets. And 
we are requiring Teva to dedicate a full-time organization to implement 
the technology transfers and other measures necessary to effectuate the 
divestitures.

Other Potential Theories of Harm

    In assessing whether the combination of the parties' generic 
businesses would harm competition or create a firm with a greater 
ability to engage in anticompetitive conduct, we evaluated three 
additional potential theories of harm beyond individual product 
overlaps.
    First, we considered whether the merger would likely lead to 
anticompetitive effects from the bundling of generic products. Although 
both Teva and Allergan have broad generic drug portfolios today, the 
evidence did not show that the breadth of their portfolios 
significantly affects their ability to win business in individual drug 
product markets. Nor have they been able to use their portfolios to 
foreclose smaller competitors. Even with one of the broadest generic 
product portfolios in the industry, Teva's overall share of U.S. 
generic prescriptions has steadily declined from 2010 to 2015, and the 
share of total prescriptions filled by the five largest generic 
suppliers has similarly fallen during this period. Generic sales occur 
at the individual product level, and customers sometimes even break up 
purchases by specific strengths to obtain more favorable pricing. As a 
result, smaller firms with much smaller portfolios compete head-to-head 
against larger generic firms and are the leading suppliers in the 
markets for many individual generic treatments. Additionally, 
purchasers actively seek to diversify their supplier base by sourcing 
from smaller suppliers. On the facts here, we concluded that 
anticompetitive effects arising from the merged company's portfolio of 
products are unlikely to occur.
    Second, we examined whether the merger would likely decrease 
incentives to challenge the patents held by brand-name pharmaceutical 
companies and bring new generic drugs to market. The regulatory 
framework governing generic pharmaceuticals, the Hatch-Waxman Act, 
provides specific procedures for identifying and resolving patent 
disputes related to new generic drugs. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, a 
company seeking to introduce a new generic drug may file what is 
commonly known as a ``Paragraph IV challenge'' to a brand-name 
pharmaceutical product's patent. This filing triggers a process, 
including potential litigation, to resolve patent issues surrounding 
the proposed generic product's entry into the marketplace.
    We considered whether the merger would likely result in fewer or 
less effective Paragraph IV challenges, but the evidence did not 
support such a conclusion. A major incentive to file Paragraph IV 
challenges is the 180-day exclusivity period awarded to the first 
generic drug that the Food and Drug Administration approves in a 
market. The financial rewards associated with this ``first-to-file'' 
exclusivity period provide a strong incentive for generic drug 
companies of all sizes to challenge brand drug patents and litigate 
against brand drug companies. Indeed, first-to-file Paragraph IV 
challenges are not concentrated among a small group of firms. To the 
contrary, many firms, including small ones, have been active and 
successful first filers. In 2014, for example, twenty-five different 
companies were the first to file Paragraph IV challenges. For eight of 
those companies, that was their very first Paragraph IV challenge. 
Thus, while Teva and Allergan have actively filed Paragraph IV 
challenges, we found no evidence that either one has been better 
positioned to win the first-to-file race or that they have 
substantially greater incentives or ability to succeed in Paragraph IV 
challenges than many other generic companies. Nor did we see evidence 
that a merger between the two would diminish the combined firm's 
incentive to continue to pursue Paragraph IV challenges.
    Finally, we analyzed whether the proposed transaction might dampen 
incentives to develop new generic products. For example, certain types 
of generic drugs are especially difficult to develop. For the most 
part, however, the parties' in-house technical capabilities to develop 
complex generic drugs do not overlap. And to the extent that there are 
complex products for which both companies have engaged in development 
efforts, we found that there are a number of other firms with similar 
capabilities such that the transaction would not substantially lessen 
competition. Moreover, generic firms, including the merging parties, 
often partner with third parties (e.g., specialized contract 
development and manufacturing organizations) to obtain the technical 
capability to develop complex generic drugs. These types of partnership 
options will remain after the merger. The consent order addresses 
individual markets where the merger was likely to harm competition, 
including markets for difficult-to-develop products that are currently 
in the parties' pipelines.

Conclusion

    We therefore concluded that the proposed merger is unlikely to 
produce anticompetitive effects beyond the markets discussed above. 
That conclusion is necessarily limited to the facts of this case. 
Another set of facts presented by a different transaction might lead us 
to find that there are competitive concerns that extend beyond markets 
for individual pharmaceutical products.
    The extensive investigation and detailed consent order reflect the 
Commission's dedication to ensuring that pharmaceutical markets, 
including generic markets, remain competitive. We will continue to take 
enforcement actions, where appropriate, to ensure that any merger or 
acquisition complies with the antitrust laws and does not

[[Page 51899]]

undermine competition in the pharmaceutical industry.

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-18562 Filed 8-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6750-01-P



                                                  51892                                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                                                                                                                         EXHIBIT A
                                                     Area                                                                         Merger re-                HHI         HHI
                                                                                         City                         State                                                          Delta                  Divested store(s)
                                                    number                                                                           sult                  (pre)       (post)

                                                  1 ..............    Lewes & Rehoboth Beach ....                    DE .....     4   to   3   .......       2,947          5,369      2,421      D2565 & D488
                                                  2 ..............    Millsboro ...............................      DE .....     3   to   2   .......       3,794          6,440      2,646      D960
                                                  3 ..............    Millville ..................................   DE .....     4   to   3   .......       4,065          5,762      1,697      D1321
                                                  4 ..............    Gardner .................................      MA ....      4   to   3   .......       2,517          3,723      1,207      A434
                                                  5 ..............    Kingston ................................      MA ....      5   to   4   .......       3,140          4,459      1,318      D8008
                                                  6 ..............    Mansfield & South Easton ....                  MA ....      4   to   3   .......       2,834          4,307      1,472      D8382
                                                  7 ..............    Milford ...................................    MA ....      5   to   4   .......       2,298          2,780        482      D8021
                                                  8 ..............    Norwell ..................................     MA ....      4   to   3   .......       4,052          5,840      1,789      D8020
                                                  9 ..............    Norwood & Walpole ..............               MA ....      7   to   6   .......       2,025          2,268        243      D8022
                                                  10 ............     Quincy ...................................     MA ....      4   to   3   .......       3,854          5,092      1,239      D8018
                                                  11 ............     Saugus ..................................      MA ....      5   to   4   .......       2,140          2,819        679      D8286
                                                  12 ............     Accokeek ..............................        MD ....      2   to   1   .......       5,430         10,000      4,570      D1356
                                                  13 ............     Bowie ....................................     MD ....      4   to   3   .......       3,288          3,750        462      D1387
                                                  14 ............     California ...............................     MD ....      4   to   3   .......       3,043          4,121       1078      D784, D1210 & D2515
                                                  15 ............     Columbia ...............................       MD ....      5   to   4   .......       3,093          3,679        586      D2598 & D1529
                                                  16 ............     Cumberland & Frostburg ......                  MD ....      3   to   2   .......       4,032          5,157      1,125      D1549 & D1187
                                                  17 ............     Easton ...................................     MD ....      4   to   3   .......       2,803          3,578        775      D1289
                                                  18 ............     Edgewater .............................        MD ....      3   to   2   .......       3,920          5,261      1,341      D1315
                                                  19 ............     Gaithersburg .........................         MD ....      5   to   4   .......       4,203          5,193        989      D1345 & D1477
                                                  20 ............     Hagerstown (South) ..............              MD ....      4   to   3   .......       3,910          4,525        615      D626, D1683 & D1180
                                                  21 ............     Hagerstown (North) ..............              MD ....      4   to   3   .......       4,043          4,323        281      D1147
                                                  22 ............     La Plata ................................      MD ....      3   to   2   .......       3,935          5,007      1,072      D1168
                                                  23 ............     Lusby ....................................     MD ....      2   to   1   .......       5,108         10,000      4,892      D1443 & D2606
                                                  24 ............     Owings Mills .........................         MD ....      4   to   3   .......       3,325          4,017        692      D2535
                                                  25 ............     Prince Frederick ...................           MD ....      3   to   2   .......       3,734          5,242      1,508      D1526
                                                  26 ............     Reisterstown .........................         MD ....      4   to   3   .......       3,423          4,169        746      D786
                                                  27 ............     Salisbury ...............................      MD ....      3   to   2   .......       3,976          5,029      1,053      A351
                                                  28 ............     Sykesville ..............................      MD ....      5   to   4   .......       3,012          3,732        720      D1324
                                                  29 ............     Upper Marlboro .....................           MD ....      3   to   2   .......       3,645          5,328      1,683      D1535
                                                  30 ............     Mahopac & Carmel ...............               NY .....     5   to   4   .......       2,940          4,352      1,412      D8325
                                                  31 ............     New Paltz, Modena & High-                      NY .....     3   to   2   .......       3,690          6,601      2,911      A515
                                                                        land.
                                                  32 ............     Poughkeepsie &                                 NY .....     4 to 3 .......             3,269          5,786      2,517      D8368
                                                                        Lagrangeville.
                                                  33   ............   Rhinebeck & Red Hook ........                  NY   .....   2   to   1   .......       5,023         10,000      4,977      A536
                                                  34   ............   Wappingers Falls ..................            NY   .....   3   to   2   .......       2,646          4,256      1,610      A598
                                                  35   ............   Chambersburg ......................            PA   .....   5   to   4   .......       3,277          4,232        955      D1527 & D994
                                                  36   ............   Waynesboro ..........................          PA   .....   3   to   2   .......       5,030          5,537        506      D1663
                                                  37   ............   York ......................................    PA   .....   4   to   3   .......       3,710          4,135        424      D1241
                                                  38   ............   Culpepper .............................        VA   .....   4   to   3   .......       3,329          4,371      1,042      D250 & D1567
                                                  39   ............   Fredericksburg ......................          VA   .....   5   to   4   .......       2,696          3,560        864      D358, D419, D450, D1043, D1177,
                                                                                                                                                                                                    D1235, D1243, D1579 & D2583
                                                  40 ............     Front Royal ...........................        VA .....     3 to 2 .......             3,638          5,095      1,456      D1059
                                                  41 ............     Purcellville .............................     VA .....     3 to 2 .......             3,679          5,321      1,642      D745
                                                  42 ............     Richmond ..............................        VA .....     5 to 4 .......             2,198          2,857        659      A6421, A6434, A6433, A6498, A6429,
                                                                                                                                                                                                    A6439, A6435, A6499, A6438 &
                                                                                                                                                                                                    A6494
                                                  43 ............     Stafford .................................     VA .....     4 to 3 .......             3,333          4,038        705      D578 & D1166
                                                  44 ............     Stephens City .......................          VA .....     3 to 2 .......             4,045          5,018        973      D1489
                                                  45 ............     Winchester ............................        VA .....     3 to 2 .......             3,662          5,094      1,433      D366, D362, D733, D1281, D2668 &
                                                                                                                                                                                                    D1164
                                                  46 ............     Martinsburg ...........................        WV ....      4 to 3 .......             2,759          3,568        809      D1189 & D2568



                                                    By direction of the Commission.                                       FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION                                       Aid Public Comment describes both the
                                                  Donald S. Clark,                                                                                                                       allegations in the complaint and the
                                                  Secretary.                                                              [File No. 151 0196]                                            terms of the consent orders—embodied
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–18564 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                                         in the consent agreement—that would
                                                                                                                          Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.                            settle these allegations.
                                                  BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
                                                                                                                          and Allergan plc; Analysis To Aid                              DATES: Comments must be received on
                                                                                                                          Public Comment                                                 or before August 29, 2016.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                          AGENCY:           Federal Trade Commission.                    ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
                                                                                                                          ACTION:          Proposed consent agreement.                   comment at https://
                                                                                                                                                                                         ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
                                                                                                                          SUMMARY:   The consent agreement in this                       tevaallerganconsent online or on paper,
                                                                                                                          matter settles alleged violations of                           by following the instructions in the
                                                                                                                          federal law prohibiting unfair methods                         Request for Comment part of the
                                                                                                                          of competition. The attached Analysis to                       SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014         17:42 Aug 04, 2016         Jkt 238001       PO 00000     Frm 00053         Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703    E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM    05AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices                                                51893

                                                  below. Write ‘‘In the Matter of Teva                       Because your comment will be made                       comment to the following address:
                                                  Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and                      public, you are solely responsible for                     Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
                                                  Allergan plc, File No. 151–0196, C–                     making sure that your comment does                         Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
                                                  4589—Consent Agreement’’ on your                        not include any sensitive personal                         Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610
                                                  comment and file your comment online                    information, like anyone’s Social                          (Annex D), Washington, DC. If possible,
                                                  at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/                  Security number, date of birth, driver’s                   submit your paper comment to the
                                                  ftc/tevaallerganconsent by following the                license number or other state                              Commission by courier or overnight
                                                  instructions on the web-based form. If                  identification number or foreign country                   service.
                                                  you prefer to file your comment on                      equivalent, passport number, financial                       Visit the Commission Web site at
                                                  paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Teva                    account number, or credit or debit card                    http://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
                                                  Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and                      number. You are also solely responsible                    and the news release describing it. The
                                                  Allergan plc, File No. 151–0196, C–                     for making sure that your comment does                     FTC Act and other laws that the
                                                  4589—Consent Agreement’’ on your                        not include any sensitive health                           Commission administers permit the
                                                  comment and on the envelope, and mail                   information, like medical records or                       collection of public comments to
                                                  your comment to the following address:                  other individually identifiable health                     consider and use in this proceeding as
                                                  Federal Trade Commission, Office of the                 information. In addition, do not include                   appropriate. The Commission will
                                                  Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue                      any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or                  consider all timely and responsive
                                                  NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex D),                           financial information which . . . is                       public comments that it receives on or
                                                  Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your                   privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed                 before August 29, 2016. You can find
                                                  comment to the following address:                       in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.                  more information, including routine
                                                  Federal Trade Commission, Office of the                 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR                     uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
                                                  Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th                 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include                  the Commission’s privacy policy, at
                                                  Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610                       competitively sensitive information                        http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
                                                  (Annex D), Washington, DC 20024.                        such as costs, sales statistics,                           Analysis of Agreement Containing
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                          inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,                  Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment
                                                  Michael Moiseyev (202–326–3106),                        manufacturing processes, or customer
                                                                                                          names.                                                        The Federal Trade Commission
                                                  Bureau of Competition, 600                                                                                         (‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, subject to
                                                                                                             If you want the Commission to give
                                                  Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,                                                                               final approval, an Agreement
                                                                                                          your comment confidential treatment,
                                                  DC 20580.                                                                                                          Containing Consent Orders (‘‘Consent
                                                                                                          you must file it in paper form, with a
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant                     request for confidential treatment, and                    Agreement’’) from Teva Pharmaceutical
                                                  to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade                    you have to follow the procedure                           Industries Ltd. (‘‘Teva’’) and Allergan
                                                  Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and                    explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR                       plc (‘‘Allergan’’), which is designed to
                                                  FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is                   4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept                         remedy the anticompetitive effects
                                                  hereby given that the above-captioned                   confidential only if the FTC General                       resulting from Teva’s proposed
                                                  consent agreement containing consent                    Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,                    acquisition of Allergan’s generic
                                                  orders to cease and desist, having been                 grants your request in accordance with                     pharmaceutical business. The proposed
                                                  filed with and accepted, subject to final               the law and the public interest.                           Consent Agreement requires the parties
                                                  approval, by the Commission, has been                      Postal mail addressed to the                            (1) to divest rights and assets related to
                                                  placed on the public record for a period                Commission is subject to delay due to                      pharmaceutical markets for one or more
                                                  of thirty (30) days. The following                      heightened security screening. As a                        strengths of seventy-nine
                                                  Analysis to Aid Public Comment                          result, we encourage you to submit your                    pharmaceutical products and (2)
                                                  describes the terms of the consent                      comments online. To make sure that the                     provide certain Teva active
                                                  agreement, and the allegations in the                   Commission considers your online                           pharmaceutical ingredient (‘‘API’’)
                                                  complaint. An electronic copy of the                    comment, you must file it at https://                      customers that market one or more of
                                                  full text of the consent agreement                      ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/                            fifteen pharmaceutical products with
                                                  package can be obtained from the FTC                    tevaallerganconsent by following the                       the option to enter into long-term API
                                                  Home Page (for July 27, 2016), on the                   instructions on the web-based form. If                     supply contracts.
                                                  World Wide Web, at http://www.ftc.gov/                  this Notice appears at http://                                The proposed Consent Agreement has
                                                  os/actions.shtm.                                        www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also                       been placed on the public record for
                                                     You can file a comment online or on                  may file a comment through that Web                        thirty days for receipt of comments from
                                                  paper. For the Commission to consider                   site.                                                      interested persons. Comments received
                                                  your comment, we must receive it on or                     If you file your comment on paper,                      during this period will become part of
                                                  before August 29, 2016. Write ‘‘In the                  write ‘‘In the Matter of Teva                              the public record. After thirty days, the
                                                  Matter of Teva Pharmaceutical                           Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and                         Commission will again evaluate the
                                                  Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc, File                  Allergan plc, File No. 151–0196, C–                        proposed Consent Agreement, along
                                                  No. 151–0196, C–4589—Consent                            4589—Consent Agreement’’ on your                           with the comments received, to make a
                                                  Agreement’’ on your comment. Your                       comment and on the envelope, and mail                      final decision as to whether it should
                                                  comment—including your name and                         your comment to the following address:                     withdraw from the proposed Consent
                                                  your state—will be placed on the public                 Federal Trade Commission, Office of the                    Agreement or make final the Decision
                                                  record of this proceeding, including, to                Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue                         and Order (‘‘Order’’).
                                                  the extent practicable, on the public                   NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex D),                                 On July 26, 2015, Teva proposed to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Commission Web site, at http://                         Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your                      acquire Allergan’s generic
                                                  www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.                                                                                pharmaceutical business for
                                                  As a matter of discretion, the                             1 In particular, the written request for confidential   approximately $40.5 billion. The
                                                  Commission tries to remove individuals’                 treatment that accompanies the comment must                Commission alleges in its Complaint
                                                                                                          include the factual and legal basis for the request,
                                                  home contact information from                           and must identify the specific portions of the
                                                                                                                                                                     that the proposed acquisition, if
                                                  comments before placing them on the                     comment to be withheld from the public record. See         consummated, would violate Section 7
                                                  Commission Web site.                                    FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).                            of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00054   Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM    05AUN1


                                                  51894                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                  U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal                 between Teva and Allergan in a future                 Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral
                                                  Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15                    generic market (i.e., the generic market                Tablet 0.03/0.04/0.03/0.05/0.075/
                                                  U.S.C. 45, by lessening current or future               has not yet formed and only the branded                 0.125 mg (AB-rated to Triphasil-28)
                                                  competition in pharmaceutical markets                   drug is on the market). Absent a remedy,              Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Oral
                                                  for one or more strengths of ninety-four                the proposed acquisition would reduce                   Tablet, 0.035/0.5mg (AB-rated to
                                                  pharmaceutical products in the United                   the number of suppliers in each market                  Modicon 28)
                                                  States. The proposed Consent                            as indicated below.                                   Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestrel Oral
                                                  Agreement will remedy the alleged                                                                               Tablet, 0.03/0.3mg (AB-rated to Lo/
                                                                                                          • Current Competition Between Teva                      Ovral-28)
                                                  violations by preserving the competition
                                                                                                          and Allergan, 2-to-1 Supplier                         Æ Fludarabine Lyopholized Vial
                                                  that otherwise would be eliminated by
                                                                                                          Consolidation                                           Injection, 50 mg
                                                  the proposed acquisition.
                                                                                                          Æ Armodafinil Oral Tablet, 200 mg                     Æ Fluocinonide Topical Cream, 0.05%
                                                  I. The Products and Structure of the                    Æ Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol Oral                  Æ Flutamide Oral Capsule, 125 mg
                                                  Markets                                                   Tablet, 0.025/0.1 mg then 0.025/0.125               Æ Griseofulvin Microcrystalline Oral
                                                  a. Horizontal Competition in                              mg then 0.025/0.15 mg (AB-rated to                    Liquid Suspension, 125 mg/5 mL
                                                  Pharmaceutical Markets                                    Cyclessa)                                           Æ Metoclopramide HCl Oral Tablet, 10
                                                                                                          Æ Estazolam Oral Tablet, 1 mg                           mg
                                                     Generic drugs are chemically and                     Æ Estazolam Oral Tablet, 2 mg                         Æ Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab,
                                                  therapeutically equivalent to branded                   Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Ethynodiol                          15 mg
                                                  drugs. When a physician prescribes a                      Diacetate Oral Tablet, 0.035/1mg (AB-               Æ Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab,
                                                  particular branded drug, a pharmacy                       rated to Demulen 1/35)                                30 mg
                                                  may only dispense that branded drug or                  Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone Oral                Æ Mirtazapine Oral Disintegrating Tab,
                                                  its generic equivalent, which is ‘‘AB-                    Tablet, 0.035/1mg (AB-rated to Tri-                   45 mg
                                                  rated’’ to the branded product. State                     Norinyl 28-Day)                                     Æ Nabumetone Oral Tablet, 500 mg
                                                  laws permit or require pharmacies to                    Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone                     Æ Nabumetone Oral Tablet, 750 mg
                                                  automatically substitute the generic                      Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral Tablet,               Æ Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 10
                                                  equivalent for the prescribed branded                     0.02/0.03/0.035/1/1/1 mg (AB-rated to                 mg
                                                  drug unless a physician expressly states                  Estrostep FE)                                       Æ Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 25
                                                  not to do so.                                           Æ Metoclopramide HCl Oral Tablet, 5                     mg
                                                     The 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act                              mg                                                  Æ Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 50
                                                  provides the statutory framework for the                Æ Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule,                    mg
                                                  Food and Drug Administration (‘‘FDA’’)                    25 mg                                               Æ Nortriptyline HCl Oral Capsule, 75
                                                  to approve generic drugs. Under Hatch-                  Æ Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule,                    mg
                                                  Waxman, a generic drug manufacturer                       50 mg                                               Æ Tamoxifen Citrate Oral Tablet, 10 mg
                                                  can rely on an already-approved                         Æ Trimipramine Maleate Oral Capsule,                  Æ Tamoxifen Citrate Oral Tablet, 20 mg
                                                  branded drug’s safety and efficacy data                   100 mg                                              Æ Trimethoprim Oral Tablet, 100 mg
                                                  in its own application—called an
                                                  Abbreviated New Drug Application                        • Current Competition Between Teva                    • Current Competition Between Teva
                                                  (‘‘ANDA’’)—to the FDA, substantially                    and Allergan, 3-to-2 Supplier                         and Allergan, 4-to-3 Supplier
                                                  lowering the research and development                   Consolidation                                         Consolidation
                                                  cost of the generic drug. Upon FDA                      Æ Budesonide Inhalation Suspension,                   Æ Acitretin Oral Capsule, 17.5 mg
                                                  approval, a generic drug typically                        0.25 mg/2 mL                                        Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
                                                  launches at a discount to the branded                   Æ Budesonide Inhalation Suspension,                     Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  drug’s price. When there is only one                      0.5 mg/2 mL                                           Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/
                                                  generic drug on the market, the branded                 Æ Clarithromycin Extended Release                       Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral
                                                  drug usually competes with the generic                    Oral Tablet, 500 mg                                   Capsule, 5 mg
                                                  drug on price, either directly or through               Æ Clonidine HCl Extended Release                      Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
                                                  an authorized generic version. As                         Transdermal Film, 0.1 mg/24 hr                        Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  subsequent generic drugs launch, a                      Æ Clonidine HCl Extended Release                        Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/
                                                  generic-only market typically forms,                      Transdermal Film, 0.2 mg/24 hr                        Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral
                                                  with competition among generics                         Æ Clonidine HCl Extended Release                        Capsule, 10 mg
                                                  driving pricing. When multiple generic                    Transdermal Film, 0.3 mg/24 hr                      Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
                                                  drugs are available, customers usually                  Æ Cyclosporine Oral Solution, 100 mg/                   Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  substitute between the generics only—                     mL                                                    Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/
                                                  not the branded drug—and solicit bids                   Æ Desmopressin Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.1                 Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral
                                                  exclusively from generic drug suppliers.                  mg                                                    Capsule, 15 mg
                                                     Teva’s proposed acquisition of                       Æ Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol/Ethinyl               Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
                                                  Allergan’s generic pharmaceutical                         Estradiol Oral Tablet, 0.15/0.02 mg/                  Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  business will lessen current or future                    0.01 mg (AB-rated to Mircette)                        Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/
                                                  competition by reducing the number of                   Æ Disopyramide Phosphate Oral                           Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral
                                                  current or future suppliers in the                        Capsule, 100 mg                                       Capsule, 20 mg
                                                  pharmaceutical markets for one or more                  Æ Disopyramide Phosphate Oral                         Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  strengths of seventy-nine                                 Capsule, 150 mg                                       Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  pharmaceutical products. Those markets                  Æ Estradiol Oral Tablet, 0.5 mg                         Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/
                                                  fall into three categories: (1) Current                 Æ Estradiol Oral Tablet, 1 mg                           Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral
                                                  competition between Teva and Allergan;                  Æ Estradiol Oral Tablet, 2 mg                           Capsule, 25 mg
                                                  (2) future competition between Teva                     Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral               Æ Amphetamine Aspartate/
                                                  and Allergan in an existing generic                       Tablet, 0.02/0.1mg (AB-rated to                       Amphetamine Sulfate/
                                                  market; and (3) future competition                        Levlite-28)                                           Dextroamphetamine Saccharate/


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00055   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices                                         51895

                                                      Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Oral                      Æ Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 20 mg                  Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                      Capsule, 30 mg                                      Æ Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 40 mg                    Release Tablet, 18 mg
                                                  Æ   Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 10/                 Æ Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 80 mg                  Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                      100 mg                                                                                                      Release Tablet, 27 mg
                                                                                                          • Current Competition Between Teva
                                                  Æ   Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 25/                                                                       Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                                                                          and Allergan, 5-to-4 Supplier
                                                      100 mg                                                                                                      Release Tablet, 36 mg
                                                  Æ   Carbidopa/Levodopa Oral Tablet, 25/                 Consolidation
                                                                                                                                                                Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                      250 mg                                              Æ Acitretin Oral Capsule, 10 mg                         Release Tablet, 54 mg
                                                  Æ   Cyclosporine Oral Capsule, 25 mg                    Æ Acitretin Oral Capsule, 25 mg                       Æ Tobramycin Inhalant Solution, 300
                                                  Æ   Cyclosporine Oral Capsule, 100 mg                   Æ Alendronate Sodium Oral Tablet, 35                    mg/5 mL
                                                  Æ   Desmopressin Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.2                 mg
                                                      mg                                                  Æ Buspirone HCl Oral Tablet, 15 mg                    • Future Competition Between Teva
                                                  Æ   Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended                     Æ Clozapine Oral Tablet, 25 mg                        and Allergan in a Future Generic
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 5 mg                          Æ Clozapine Oral Tablet, 100 mg                       Market, 2-to-1 Supplier Consolidation
                                                  Æ   Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended                     Æ Drospirenone/Ethinyl Estradiol Oral                 Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 10 mg                           Tablet, 3/0.03 mg (AB-rated to                        Release Capsule, 10 mg
                                                  Æ   Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended                       Yasmin-28)                                          Æ Ramelteon Tablet, 8 mg
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 20 mg                         Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral
                                                                                                            Tablet, 0.02/0.1 mg (AB-rated to                    • Future Competition Between Teva
                                                  Æ   Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended
                                                                                                            Alesse-28)                                          and Allergan in a Future Generic
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 5 mg
                                                  Æ   Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended                  Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral               Market, 3-to-2 Supplier Consolidation
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 10 mg                           Tablet, 0.03/0.15 mg (AB-rated to                   Æ Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal
                                                  Æ   Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Extended                    Nordette)                                             Film, 12/3 mg
                                                      Release Oral Capsule, 15 mg                         Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral               Æ Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal
                                                  Æ   Diazepam Oral Tablet, 2 mg                            Tablet, 0.03/0.01/0.15 mg (AB-rated to                Film, 4/1 mg
                                                  Æ   Diazepam Oral Tablet, 5 mg                            Seasonique)                                         Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Etonogestrel
                                                  Æ   Diazepam Oral Tablet, 10 mg                         Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone                       Vaginal Ring 0.015mg/24hr; 0.012mg/
                                                  Æ   Epirubicin Injection Vial 50 mg/25                    Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral Tablet,                 24hr
                                                      mL                                                    0.02/1 mg (AB-rated to Loestrin FE 1/               Æ NAB Paclitaxel Injectable
                                                  Æ   Epirubicin Injection Vial 200 mg/100                  20)                                                   Suspension, 100 mg/vial
                                                      mL                                                  Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone                     Æ Phentermine HCl/Topiramate
                                                  Æ   Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral                 Acetate/Ferrous Fumarate Oral Tablet,                 Extended Release Capsule, 11.25/69
                                                      Tablet, 0.02/0.01/0.1mg (AB-rated to                  0.03/1.5 mg (AB-rated to Loestrin FE                  mg
                                                      Lo Seasonique)                                        1.5/30)                                             Æ Phentermine HCl/Topiramate
                                                  Æ   Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone                     Æ Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.35 mg                    Extended Release Capsule, 15/92 mg
                                                      Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.02/1mg (AB-                    (AB-rated to Micronor 28)                           Æ Phentermine HCl/Topiramate
                                                      rated to Loestrin 21 1/20)                          Æ Norethindrone Oral Tablet, 0.35 mg                    Extended Release Capsule, 3.75/23 mg
                                                  Æ   Ethinyl Estradiol/Norethindrone                       (AB-rated to Nor-QD)                                Æ Phentermine HCl/Topiramate
                                                      Acetate Oral Tablet, 0.03/1.5mg (AB-                                                                        Extended Release Capsule, 7.5/46 mg
                                                      rated to Loestrin 21 1.5/30)                        • Future Competition Between Teva                     Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 1 mg
                                                  Æ   Glyburide/Metformin HC1 Oral                        and Allergan in an Existing Generic                   Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 2 mg
                                                      Tablet, 1.25/250 mg                                 Market, 3-to-2 Supplier Consolidation                 Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 3 mg
                                                  Æ   Glyburide/Metformin HCl Oral                        Æ Budesonide Inhalation Suspension, 1                 Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 4 mg
                                                      Tablet, 2.5/500 mg                                    mg/2 mL                                             Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 6 mg
                                                  Æ   Glyburide/Metformin HCl Oral                        Æ Fluocinonide Cream Emulsified Base                  Æ Rotigotine Transdermal Patch, 8 mg
                                                      Tablet, 5/500 mg                                      0.05%                                               • Future Competition Between Teva
                                                  Æ   Hydroxyzine Pamoate Oral Capsule,                   Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended                        and Allergan in a Future Generic
                                                      25 mg                                                 Release Capsule, 20 mg                              Market, 4-to-3 Supplier Consolidation
                                                  Æ   Hydroxyzine Pamoate Oral Capsule,                   Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended
                                                      50 mg                                                 Release Capsule, 30 mg                              Æ Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal
                                                  Æ   Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution,               Æ Methylphenidate HCl Extended                          Film, 2/0.5 mg
                                                      0.0103%                                               Release Capsule, 40 mg                              Æ Buprenorphine/Naloxone Buccal
                                                  Æ   Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution,                                                                       Film, 8/2 mg
                                                                                                          • Future Competition Between Teva                     Æ Dienogest/Estradiol Valerate and
                                                      0.0210%
                                                  Æ   Levalbuterol HCl Inhalation Solution,               and Allergan in an Existing Generic                     Estradiol Valerate Oral Tablet, 3 mg,
                                                      0.042%                                              Market, 4-to-3 Supplier Consolidation                   2/2 mg, 3/2 mg, 1 mg (AB-rated to
                                                  Æ   Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 50 mg                 Æ Aspirin/Dipyridamole Extended                         Natazia)
                                                  Æ   Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 75 mg                   Release Oral Capsule 25/200 mg                      Æ Ethinyl Estradiol/Levonorgestrel Oral
                                                  Æ   Minocycline HCl Oral Capsule, 100                                                                           Tablet, 0.02/0.15 mg; 0.025/0.15 mg;
                                                                                                          • Future Competition Between Teva                       0.03 mg/0.15 mg; 0.01 mg (AB-rated to
                                                      mg
                                                                                                          and Allergan in an Existing Generic                     Quartette)
                                                  Æ   Nitrofurantoin Oral Capsules, 50 mg
                                                      Nitrofurantoin Oral Capsules, 100 mg                Market, 5-to-4 Supplier Consolidation                 Æ Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/10
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Æ
                                                  Æ   Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/                 Æ Benzoyl Peroxide/Clindamycin                          mg
                                                      mL 20 mL vial                                         Phosphate Gel, 5%/1%                                Æ Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/20
                                                  Æ   Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/                 Æ Clozapine Oral Tablet, 200 mg                         mg
                                                      mL 50 mL vial                                       Æ Methotrexate Injection, 25 mg/mL in                 Æ Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/40
                                                  Æ   Propofol Injection Emulsion, 10 mg/                   2 mL vial                                             mg
                                                      mL 100 mL vial                                      Æ Methotrexate Injection, 25 mg/mL in                 Æ Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablets, 10/80
                                                  Æ   Propranolol HCl Oral Tablet, 10 mg                    10 mL vial                                            mg


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00056   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1


                                                  51896                          Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                  Æ Imiquimod Topical Cream, 3.75%                          • Fluorouracil API;                                 Teva and Allergan are two of a limited
                                                  Æ Four pipeline products 2                                • Probenecid API; and                               number of current or likely future
                                                                                                            • Triamcinolone acetonide API.                      suppliers in the United States.
                                                  • Future Competition Between Teva                         The fifteen downstream                              Customers and competitors have
                                                  and Allergan in a Future Generic                        pharmaceutical markets in which                       observed that the price of generic
                                                  Market, 5-to-4 Supplier Consolidation                   competition would be lessened as a                    pharmaceutical products decreases with
                                                  Æ Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended                       result of the acquisition are:                        new entry even after several suppliers
                                                    Release Oral Capsule, 25 mg                             • Betamethasone dipropionate                        have entered the market. Removal of an
                                                  Æ Dexmethylphenidate HCl Extended                       augmented ointment, 0.05%;                            independent generic pharmaceutical
                                                    Release Oral Capsule, 35 mg                             • Betamethasone dipropionate cream,                 supplier from the relevant markets in
                                                  Æ Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 100 mcg                       0.05%;                                                which Teva and Allergan currently
                                                  Æ Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 200 mcg                         • Betamethasone dipropionate lotion,                compete would result in significantly
                                                  Æ Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 400 mcg                       0.05%;                                                higher prices post-acquisition.
                                                  Æ Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 600 mcg                         • Betamethasone dipropionate                        Similarly, the elimination of a future
                                                  Æ Fentanyl Buccal Tablet, 800 mcg                       ointment, 0.05%;                                      independent competitor would prevent
                                                  Æ Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended                      • Betamethasone valerate cream,                     the price decreases that are likely to
                                                    Release Tablet, 500/5 mg                              0.1%;                                                 result from the firm’s entry. Thus,
                                                  Æ Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended                      • Betamethasone valerate ointment,                  absent a remedy, the proposed
                                                    Release Tablet, 1000/2.5 mg                           0.1%;                                                 acquisition would likely result in
                                                  Æ Metformin HCl/Saxagliptin Extended                      • Clobetasol propionate shampoo,
                                                                                                                                                                significantly higher prices for these
                                                    Release Tablet, 1000/5 mg                             0.05%;
                                                                                                                                                                generic drugs.
                                                                                                            • Clobetasol propionate ointment,
                                                  b. API Supply and Competition in                        0.05%;                                                  Additionally, the proposed
                                                  Pharmaceutical Markets                                    • Desonide cream, 0.05%;                            acquisition likely would cause
                                                     APIs are central inputs in the                         • Probenecid tablets, 500 mg;                       competitive harm in markets for fifteen
                                                  manufacture of finished dose form                         • Probenecid/colchicine tablets, 500                pharmaceutical products in which Teva
                                                  pharmaceutical products. API supply                     mg/0.5 mg;                                            supplies API for a generic
                                                  sources must be designated in a drug’s                    • Nystatin/triamcinolone acetonide                  pharmaceutical product that currently
                                                  FDA marketing authorization. Switching                  cream, 100,000 units/gm/0.1%;                         competes or will compete in the near
                                                  to a non-designated API source requires                   • Nystatin/triamcinolone acetonide                  future with an Allergan generic
                                                  a drug maker to supplement its New                      ointment, 100,000 units/gm/0.1%; and                  pharmaceutical product. Those generic
                                                  Drug Application or ANDA, a process                       • Two pipeline products.3                           pharmaceutical markets already have or
                                                  that can take as long as two years or                                                                         will have a limited number of
                                                                                                          II. Entry
                                                  even more. Consequently, a generic drug                                                                       competitors, some of which are
                                                                                                             Entry into these pharmaceutical                    supplied API by Teva. Teva has the
                                                  manufacturer’s API supply options are                   markets would not be timely, likely, or
                                                  limited to the sources qualified under                                                                        ability to foreclose these competitors by
                                                                                                          sufficient in magnitude, character, and               denying them API from their only
                                                  its ANDA. If only one API supplier is                   scope to deter or counteract the
                                                  qualified under an ANDA, the ANDA                                                                             approved source. Post-acquisition, Teva
                                                                                                          anticompetitive effects of the proposed               would have the incentive to foreclose
                                                  holder has no immediate recourse if its                 acquisition. Introducing generic
                                                  designated API supplier elects to raise                                                                       one or more competitors because the
                                                                                                          pharmaceutical products is costly and                 lost API sales would be less than the
                                                  its prices or refuse to supply.                         lengthy due to drug development times
                                                     Teva is world’s largest API supplier                                                                       recouped profits on additional sales
                                                                                                          and regulatory requirements, including                gained from the foreclosed competitor(s)
                                                  and supplies API to Allergan’s
                                                                                                          approval by the FDA. Additionally, it                 and the increased prices. Such
                                                  competitors in a number of generic
                                                                                                          can take up to two years for an API                   foreclosure would harm consumers
                                                  markets. The proposed acquisition may
                                                                                                          manufacturer to qualify as a new API                  because market concentration and price
                                                  lessen current or future competition in
                                                                                                          supplier for a generic pharmaceutical                 would result in significantly higher
                                                  fifteen pharmaceutical products markets
                                                                                                          product, leaving the generic                          prices.
                                                  by creating the incentive and ability for
                                                                                                          pharmaceutical product with no
                                                  Teva to foreclose rival suppliers of                                                                          IV. The Consent Agreement
                                                                                                          alternative to its existing qualified API
                                                  fifteen newly acquired Allergan
                                                                                                          supplier or suppliers.                                   The remedy reflected in the proposed
                                                  pharmaceutical products by
                                                  withholding supply of the following                     III. Effects                                          Consent Agreement would eliminate the
                                                  eight Teva API products:                                                                                      likely anticompetitive effects of the
                                                                                                             The proposed acquisition likely                    proposed acquisition by requiring the
                                                     • Betamethasone dipropionate API;                    would cause significant anticompetitive
                                                     • Betamethasone valerate API;                                                                              parties to divest rights and assets related
                                                                                                          harm by eliminating current or future                 to the pharmaceutical products in each
                                                     • Clobetasol propionate API;                         competition in markets for one or more
                                                     • Desonide API;                                                                                            relevant market. The acquirers are:
                                                                                                          strengths of seventy-nine                             Mayne Pharma Group Ltd. (‘‘Mayne’’),
                                                     • Fluocinolone API;                                  pharmaceutical products where the                     Impax Laboratories, Inc. (‘‘Impax’’), Dr.
                                                    2 Teva’s and Allergan’s independent development
                                                                                                          parties currently sell or are developing              Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (‘‘Dr.
                                                  projects for two overlapping pharmaceutical             generic drugs. In each of these markets,              Reddy’s’’), Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
                                                  products are not public, and their existence is                                                               (‘‘Sagent’’), Cipla Limited (‘‘Cipla’’),
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  confidential business information. But for the            3 Allergan has not yet made public the

                                                  proposed acquisition, certain strengths of the Teva     development of two pharmaceutical products that
                                                                                                                                                                Zydus Worldwide DMCC (‘‘Zydus’’),
                                                  and Allergan products would likely compete in four      would likely compete with products for which Teva     Mikah Pharma LLC (‘‘Mikah’’), Perrigo
                                                  future markets. To preserve the confidentiality of      supplies API. To preserve the confidentiality of      Pharma International D.A.C. (‘‘Perrigo’’),
                                                  these development programs, the specific future         these Allergan development programs, the specific     Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
                                                  markets in which these products would compete           markets in which these likely future products
                                                  are not identified in this document, and references     would compete are not identified in this document,
                                                                                                                                                                (‘‘Aurobindo’’), Prasco LLC (‘‘Prasco’’),
                                                  to these products have been redacted from the           and references to these products have been redacted   and 3M Company (‘‘3M’’) (collectively,
                                                  public version of the Complaint.                        from the public version of the Complaint.             the ‘‘Acquirers’’). The parties must


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00057   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices                                                  51897

                                                  divest the products no later than ten                   manufacturing transfers. To ensure that               drug company in the United States, with
                                                  days after the acquisition.                             the buyers of divestiture products for                an overall generic market share of
                                                     The Commission’s goal in evaluating                  which Teva or Allergan supply API will                approximately 13%; Allergan is third,
                                                  possible acquirers of divested assets is                have access to adequate supplies of                   accounting for approximately 9% of
                                                  to maintain the competitive                             reasonably priced API until they are                  generic sales.1 Although this merger
                                                  environment that existed prior to the                   able to qualify alternative suppliers, the            combines two large sellers of generic
                                                  acquisition. The Commission                             proposed Consent Agreement requires                   drugs, the generic pharmaceutical
                                                  thoroughly reviewed the assets to be                    Teva to supply API for up to four years               industry as a whole remains relatively
                                                  divested, the transitional services to be               after closing at prices not to exceed                 unconcentrated. Over two hundred
                                                  provided by Teva, and the capabilities                  those set forth in binding letters of                 firms sell generic drugs in the United
                                                  and plans of each Acquirer. The interim                 intent, recently executed by Teva and                 States and the five largest suppliers
                                                  monitors, who will oversee the                          the buyers. Nothing in the Consent                    account only for about half of overall
                                                  divestiture process, have worked closely                Agreement precludes the buyers from                   generic sales. Following this
                                                  with Commission staff to ensure the                     sourcing other divestiture product                    transaction, the combined firm will
                                                  viability of the divestiture and                        inputs from Teva on a negotiated basis.               likely have a 22% share of industry-
                                                  anticipate logistical and technical                        In addition, to address the                        wide sales across all generic product
                                                  challenges. Additionally, Teva—in                       anticompetitive effects likely to arise in            markets.
                                                  conjunction with the Acquirers,                         the fifteen pharmaceutical markets                       Despite the industry’s relatively low
                                                  Allergan, and interim monitors—has                      where Teva supplies API to Allergan                   concentration, the Commission
                                                  prepared a comprehensive divestiture                    competitors, the Consent Agreement                    appreciates that the price, quality, and
                                                  plan to guide the process of transferring               requires Teva to give API customers in                availability of generic pharmaceutical
                                                  the divested products to their new                      those markets the option of entering into             products have a significant impact on
                                                  proposed owners. If the Commission                      long-term API supply contracts. Teva                  American consumers’ daily lives and on
                                                  determines that an Acquirer is not                      must notify each affected API customer                healthcare costs nationwide. We
                                                  acceptable, or that the manner of the                   of the option to enter a contract within              therefore looked closely at every
                                                  divestitures is not acceptable, the                     ten days of consummating the proposed                 possible aspect of this transaction that
                                                  parties must unwind the sale or release                 acquisition, and such customers may                   could result in competitive harm. We
                                                  of rights to that Acquirer and divest the               exercise their options at any point up to             examined not only particular product
                                                  products to a Commission-approved                       three years after the date of the Consent             overlaps but also whether the
                                                  acquirer within six months of the date                  Agreement. Any such API supply                        combination between Teva and Allergan
                                                  the Order becomes final. In that                        contracts executed pursuant to the                    would result in other adverse
                                                  circumstance, the Commission may                        option shall be renewable for up three                consequences to competition. Our
                                                  appoint a trustee to divest the products                years after the date of the Consent                   comprehensive investigation included
                                                  if the parties fail to divest the products              Agreement, which will give the                        the review of extensive documents from
                                                  as required.                                            customers sufficient time to qualify                  the merging parties and other industry
                                                     The proposed Consent Agreement                       alternative API suppliers if they wish to             players as well as interviews with
                                                  contains provisions to help ensure the                  do so.                                                dozens of customers and more than 50
                                                  divestitures are successful. The parties                   The purpose of this analysis is to                 competitors. We concluded that the
                                                  must take all action to maintain the                    facilitate public comment on the                      substantial divestitures required by the
                                                  economic viability, marketability, and                  proposed Consent Agreement, and it is                 consent order resolve the competitive
                                                  competitiveness of the divestiture                      not intended to constitute an official                concerns resulting from the transaction.
                                                  products until they are divested. The                   interpretation of the proposed Order or
                                                  parties must provide transitional                                                                             The Complaint and Remedy
                                                                                                          to modify its terms in any way.
                                                  services to the Acquirers to assist them                                                                        As detailed in our complaint, we have
                                                                                                          Statement of the Federal Trade                        reason to believe that, absent a remedy,
                                                  in establishing independent
                                                                                                          Commission in the Matter of Teva                      the transaction would likely
                                                  manufacturing capabilities. These
                                                  transitional services include technical                 Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. and                   substantially reduce competition in 79
                                                  assistance to manufacture the                           Allergan plc                                          markets for pharmaceutical products,
                                                  divestiture products in substantially the                  The Commission has accepted a                      including oral contraceptives, steroidal
                                                  same manner and quality employed or                     proposed consent order in connection                  medications, mental health drugs, and
                                                  achieved by the parties, as well as                     with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries                   many other products. These markets
                                                  advice and training from knowledgeable                  Ltd.’s proposed acquisition of the                    include individual strengths of
                                                  employees. The goal of the transitional                 generic pharmaceutical business of                    pharmaceutical products where Teva
                                                  services is to ensure that the acquirers                Allergan plc. We believe the consent                  and Allergan currently offer competing
                                                  will be able to operate independently of                order remedies the anticompetitive                    products as well as products where
                                                  the parties in the manufacture and sale                 effects that would otherwise likely                   there would likely be future competition
                                                  of the divested products. The proposed                  result from this transaction by requiring             absent the merger because one or both
                                                  Consent Agreement also requires the                     the divestiture of nearly 80 drug                     of the parties are developing competing
                                                  parties to supply product to the                        products to buyers that appear well                   products.2 To remedy the likely
                                                  Acquirers so that the Acquirers can                     positioned to replicate the competition
                                                  market them independently while the                     that would have occurred absent the                     1 This market share data is based on 2014 IMS

                                                  parties transfer the associated                                                                               gross sales data.
                                                                                                          merger. The consent order includes a
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                  2 In addition to selling finished pharmaceutical
                                                  technology to the production facilities                 number of safeguards to help achieve                  products, Teva and Allergan also sell active
                                                  of the Acquirer or its chosen third-party               our remedial goals.                                   pharmaceutical ingredients (API) to many third-
                                                  manufacturer(s). The Consent                               Both Teva and Allergan are global                  party drug manufacturers, including parties that
                                                  Agreement allows sufficient time to                     pharmaceutical companies that are                     will now compete with the merged entity. Where
                                                                                                                                                                the number of competitors in the finished product
                                                  complete the manufacturing transfers,                   among the largest suppliers of generic                market is limited, the Commission determined that
                                                  and for products in development, to                     pharmaceuticals in the United States.                 this vertical relationship could raise competitive
                                                  gain FDA approval before completing                     Teva is currently the largest generic                                                           Continued




                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00058   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1


                                                  51898                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices

                                                  anticompetitive effects in each of the                  evidence did not show that the breadth                and successful first filers. In 2014, for
                                                  relevant markets, the consent order                     of their portfolios significantly affects             example, twenty-five different
                                                  requires the divestiture of the products                their ability to win business in                      companies were the first to file
                                                  and related assets to specific acquirers                individual drug product markets. Nor                  Paragraph IV challenges. For eight of
                                                  that the Commission has closely vetted                  have they been able to use their                      those companies, that was their very
                                                  and approved. Where at least one                        portfolios to foreclose smaller                       first Paragraph IV challenge. Thus,
                                                  dosage strength raised a competitive                    competitors. Even with one of the                     while Teva and Allergan have actively
                                                  concern, we required Teva to divest all                 broadest generic product portfolios in                filed Paragraph IV challenges, we found
                                                  strengths. These divestitures, and the                  the industry, Teva’s overall share of U.S.            no evidence that either one has been
                                                  other relief contained in the proposed                  generic prescriptions has steadily                    better positioned to win the first-to-file
                                                  consent order, are designed to maintain                 declined from 2010 to 2015, and the                   race or that they have substantially
                                                  competition in the relevant markets.                    share of total prescriptions filled by the            greater incentives or ability to succeed
                                                     In settling this case, we rely on the                five largest generic suppliers has                    in Paragraph IV challenges than many
                                                  Commission’s extensive experience                       similarly fallen during this period.                  other generic companies. Nor did we see
                                                  with divestitures in the pharmaceutical                 Generic sales occur at the individual                 evidence that a merger between the two
                                                  industry, including prior divestitures                  product level, and customers sometimes                would diminish the combined firm’s
                                                  involving Teva and Allergan and have                    even break up purchases by specific                   incentive to continue to pursue
                                                  structured the divestitures in a way to                 strengths to obtain more favorable                    Paragraph IV challenges.
                                                  minimize potential risks. This includes                 pricing. As a result, smaller firms with                 Finally, we analyzed whether the
                                                  breaking the divested products into                     much smaller portfolios compete head-                 proposed transaction might dampen
                                                  smaller packages to ease the load on any                to-head against larger generic firms and              incentives to develop new generic
                                                  single buyer and requiring Teva to                      are the leading suppliers in the markets              products. For example, certain types of
                                                  divest the easier-to-divest product of the              for many individual generic treatments.               generic drugs are especially difficult to
                                                  overlapping products whenever                           Additionally, purchasers actively seek                develop. For the most part, however, the
                                                  possible. We also undertook an                          to diversify their supplier base by                   parties’ in-house technical capabilities
                                                  extensive review process to ensure that                 sourcing from smaller suppliers. On the               to develop complex generic drugs do
                                                  the divestiture buyers are acceptable                   facts here, we concluded that                         not overlap. And to the extent that there
                                                  and have the resources they need to                     anticompetitive effects arising from the              are complex products for which both
                                                  compete successfully in the relevant                    merged company’s portfolio of products                companies have engaged in
                                                  markets. The buyers have identified                     are unlikely to occur.                                development efforts, we found that
                                                  third-party contract research                              Second, we examined whether the                    there are a number of other firms with
                                                  organizations or contract manufacturers                 merger would likely decrease incentives               similar capabilities such that the
                                                  they intend to use and provided us with                 to challenge the patents held by brand-               transaction would not substantially
                                                  executed contracts. We involved interim                 name pharmaceutical companies and                     lessen competition. Moreover, generic
                                                  monitors early in the divestiture                       bring new generic drugs to market. The                firms, including the merging parties,
                                                  negotiation process to ensure a smooth                  regulatory framework governing generic                often partner with third parties (e.g.,
                                                  divestiture process and harmonize                       pharmaceuticals, the Hatch-Waxman                     specialized contract development and
                                                  Teva’s technological transfer plans with                Act, provides specific procedures for                 manufacturing organizations) to obtain
                                                                                                          identifying and resolving patent                      the technical capability to develop
                                                  those of the acquirors of the divested
                                                                                                          disputes related to new generic drugs.                complex generic drugs. These types of
                                                  assets. And we are requiring Teva to
                                                                                                          Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, a                         partnership options will remain after
                                                  dedicate a full-time organization to
                                                                                                          company seeking to introduce a new                    the merger. The consent order addresses
                                                  implement the technology transfers and
                                                                                                          generic drug may file what is commonly                individual markets where the merger
                                                  other measures necessary to effectuate
                                                                                                          known as a ‘‘Paragraph IV challenge’’ to              was likely to harm competition,
                                                  the divestitures.
                                                                                                          a brand-name pharmaceutical product’s                 including markets for difficult-to-
                                                  Other Potential Theories of Harm                        patent. This filing triggers a process,               develop products that are currently in
                                                    In assessing whether the combination                  including potential litigation, to resolve            the parties’ pipelines.
                                                  of the parties’ generic businesses would                patent issues surrounding the proposed
                                                                                                                                                                Conclusion
                                                                                                          generic product’s entry into the
                                                  harm competition or create a firm with                                                                          We therefore concluded that the
                                                                                                          marketplace.
                                                  a greater ability to engage in                                                                                proposed merger is unlikely to produce
                                                                                                             We considered whether the merger
                                                  anticompetitive conduct, we evaluated                   would likely result in fewer or less                  anticompetitive effects beyond the
                                                  three additional potential theories of                  effective Paragraph IV challenges, but                markets discussed above. That
                                                  harm beyond individual product                          the evidence did not support such a                   conclusion is necessarily limited to the
                                                  overlaps.                                               conclusion. A major incentive to file                 facts of this case. Another set of facts
                                                    First, we considered whether the                      Paragraph IV challenges is the 180-day                presented by a different transaction
                                                  merger would likely lead to                             exclusivity period awarded to the first               might lead us to find that there are
                                                  anticompetitive effects from the                        generic drug that the Food and Drug                   competitive concerns that extend
                                                  bundling of generic products. Although                  Administration approves in a market.                  beyond markets for individual
                                                  both Teva and Allergan have broad                       The financial rewards associated with                 pharmaceutical products.
                                                  generic drug portfolios today, the                      this ‘‘first-to-file’’ exclusivity period               The extensive investigation and
                                                                                                          provide a strong incentive for generic                detailed consent order reflect the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  concerns in markets for finished drug products by
                                                  creating the incentive and ability for Teva to raise
                                                                                                          drug companies of all sizes to challenge              Commission’s dedication to ensuring
                                                  prices or withhold supply where third parties           brand drug patents and litigate against               that pharmaceutical markets, including
                                                  source from the merged firm. To address these           brand drug companies. Indeed, first-to-               generic markets, remain competitive.
                                                  concerns, the order requires Teva to provide            file Paragraph IV challenges are not                  We will continue to take enforcement
                                                  affected customers with the option of entering into
                                                  long-term API supply contracts to ensure that they
                                                                                                          concentrated among a small group of                   actions, where appropriate, to ensure
                                                  have an adequate supply of API until they are able      firms. To the contrary, many firms,                   that any merger or acquisition complies
                                                  to qualify alternative suppliers.                       including small ones, have been active                with the antitrust laws and does not


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00059   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 151 / Friday, August 5, 2016 / Notices                                                 51899

                                                  undermine competition in the                            certifies companies that meet the                       By direction of the Commission.
                                                  pharmaceutical industry.                                standards.                                            Donald S. Clark,
                                                    By direction of the Commission.                          Companies under the FTC’s                          Secretary.
                                                  Donald S. Clark,                                        jurisdiction are eligible to apply for                [FR Doc. 2016–18566 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  Secretary.                                              APEC CBPR certification. The names of                 BILLING CODE 6750–01–P

                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–18562 Filed 8–4–16; 8:45 am]              certified companies are posted on a
                                                  BILLING CODE 6750–01–P                                  public-facing Web site, www.cbprs.org.
                                                                                                          Companies must re-apply annually in                   FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
                                                                                                          order to retain their status as current               [File No. 161–0102]
                                                  FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION                                participants in the APEC CBPR system.
                                                                                                          A company that falsely claims APEC                    Mylan N.V.; Analysis To Aid Public
                                                  [File No. 1623034, Docket No. C–4580]                   CBPR participation may be subject to an               Comment
                                                                                                          enforcement action based on the FTC’s                 AGENCY:    Federal Trade Commission.
                                                  Very Incognito Technologies, Inc.,                      deception authority under Section 5 of
                                                  Doing Business as Vipvape                                                                                     ACTION:   Proposed consent agreement.
                                                                                                          the FTC Act.
                                                  AGENCY:  Federal Trade Commission.                                                                            SUMMARY:   The consent agreement in this
                                                                                                             Vipvape makes and distributes hand-
                                                                                                                                                                matter settles alleged violations of
                                                  ACTION: Consent order.                                  held vaporizers. According to the
                                                                                                                                                                federal law prohibiting unfair methods
                                                                                                          Commission’s complaint, Vipvape has                   of competition. The attached Analysis to
                                                  SUMMARY:   The Commission has                           set forth on its Web site, https://
                                                  approved a final consent order in this                                                                        Aid Public Comment describes both the
                                                                                                          www.vipvape.com/content/legal/                        allegations in the complaint and the
                                                  matter, settling alleged violations of
                                                                                                          warranty/privacy, privacy policies and                terms of the consent orders—embodied
                                                  federal law prohibiting deceptive acts or
                                                                                                          statements about its practices, including             in the consent agreement—that would
                                                  practices. The attached Analysis to Aid
                                                                                                          statements related to its participation in            settle these allegations.
                                                  Public Comment describes both the
                                                  allegations in the Complaint and the                    the APEC CBPR system.                                 DATES: Comments must be received on
                                                  terms of the Decision and Order.                           The Commission’s complaint alleges                 or before August 29, 2016.
                                                  DATES: Issued on June 21, 2016.                         that Vipvape falsely represented that it              ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                          was a participant in the APEC CBPR                    comment at https://
                                                                                                          system when, in fact, it never sought or              ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
                                                  Analysis of Agreement Containing                        obtained certification.                               mylanmedaconsent online or on paper,
                                                  Consent Order To Aid Public Comment                                                                           by following the instructions in the
                                                                                                             Part I of the order prohibits Vipvape
                                                     The Federal Trade Commission                         from making misrepresentations about                  Request for Comment part of the
                                                  (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has approved                                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
                                                                                                          its participation in any privacy or
                                                  a final consent order applicable to Very                                                                      below. Write ‘‘In the Matter of Mylan
                                                                                                          security program sponsored by a
                                                  Incognito Technologies, Inc. dba                                                                              N.V., File No. 161–0102—Consent
                                                                                                          government or any self-regulatory or
                                                  Vipvape (‘‘Vipvape’’).                                                                                        Agreement’’ on your comment and file
                                                                                                          standard-setting organization, including,
                                                     The consent order was placed on the                                                                        your comment online at https://
                                                                                                          but not limited to, the APEC CBPR                     ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
                                                  public record for thirty (30) days for                  system.
                                                  receipt of comments by interested                                                                             mylanmedaconsent by following the
                                                  persons. Comments received during this                     Parts II through VI of the order are               instructions on the web-based form. If
                                                  period became part of the public record.                reporting and compliance provisions.                  you prefer to file your comment on
                                                  After the public comment period, the                    Part II requires acknowledgment of the                paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Mylan
                                                  Commission reviewed the agreement                       order and dissemination of the order                  N.V., File No. 161–0102—Consent
                                                  and the comments received, and                          now and in the future to persons with                 Agreement’’ on your comment and on
                                                  determined to make the proposed order                   responsibilities relating to the subject              the envelope, and mail your comment to
                                                  final.                                                  matter of the order. Part III ensures                 the following address: Federal Trade
                                                     This matter concerns allegedly false                 notification to the FTC of changes in                 Commission, Office of the Secretary,
                                                  representations that Vipvape made to                    corporate status and mandates that                    600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
                                                  consumers concerning its participation                  Vipvape submit an initial compliance                  CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC
                                                  in the Asia-Pacific Economic                            report to the FTC. Part IV requires                   20580, or deliver your comment to the
                                                  Cooperation (‘‘APEC’’) Cross Border                     Vipvape to retain documents relating to               following address: Federal Trade
                                                  Privacy Rules (‘‘CBPR’’) system. The                    its compliance with the order for a five-             Commission, Office of the Secretary,
                                                  APEC CBPR system is a voluntary,                                                                              Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW.,
                                                                                                          year period. Part V mandates that
                                                  enforceable mechanism that certifies a                                                                        5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D),
                                                                                                          Vipvape make available to the FTC
                                                  company’s compliance with the                                                                                 Washington, DC 20024.
                                                                                                          information or subsequent compliance
                                                  principles in the CBPR and facilitates                                                                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                                                                          reports, as requested. Part VI is a
                                                  privacy-respecting transfers of data                                                                          Christina Perez (202–326–2350), Bureau
                                                                                                          provision that ‘‘sunsets’’ the order on
                                                  amongst APEC member economies. The                                                                            of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania
                                                                                                          June 21, 2036, with certain exceptions.
                                                  APEC CBPR system is based on nine                                                                             Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
                                                  data privacy principles: Preventing                        The purpose of this analysis, which                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  harm, notice, collection limitation, use                was placed on the Commission Web site                 to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
                                                  choice, integrity, security safeguards,                 on May 4, 2016, was to facilitate public              Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
                                                  access and correction, and                              comment on the proposed order. It is                  FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
                                                  accountability. Companies that seek to                  not intended to constitute an official                hereby given that the above-captioned
                                                  participate in the APEC CBPR system                     interpretation of the complaint or order              consent agreement containing consent
                                                  must undergo a review by an APEC-                       or to modify the order’s terms in any                 orders to cease and desist, having been
                                                  recognized Accountability Agent, which                  way.                                                  filed with and accepted, subject to final


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:42 Aug 04, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00060   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\05AUN1.SGM   05AUN1



Document Created: 2016-08-05 06:43:40
Document Modified: 2016-08-05 06:43:40
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionProposed consent agreement.
DatesComments must be received on or before August 29, 2016.
ContactMichael Moiseyev (202-326-3106), Bureau of Competition, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FR Citation81 FR 51892 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR