81 FR 52593 - Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac System of Records
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 153 (August 9, 2016)
Office of the Secretary
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 153 (August 9, 2016)
| Page Range | 52593-52595 | |
| FR Document | 2016-18812 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 52593-52595] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-18812] ======================================================================== Proposed Rules Federal Register ________________________________________________________________________ This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. ======================================================================== Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules [[Page 52593]] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of the Secretary 6 CFR Part 5 [Docket No. DHS-2016-0052] Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac System of Records AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Privacy Office. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-015 LeadTrac System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 9, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS- 2016-0052, by one of the following methods:Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Fax: 202-343-4010. Mail: Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Smith, Privacy Officer, (202- 732-3300), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 500 12th Street SW., Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC 20536, email: ICEPrivacy@dhs.gov, or Jonathan R. Cantor (202-343-1717), Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ``DHS/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)-015 LeadTrac System of Records'' and this proposed rule. In this rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. The LeadTrac System of Records describes the operation of an ICE information technology system of the same name, which is owned by ICE's Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) directorate. This system contains a repository of data that is ingested on a routine or ad hoc basis from other existing sources, and an index created from that data. LeadTrac incorporates tools that allow the data to be queried, analyzed, and presented in a variety of formats that can help illuminate relationships among the various data elements. The purpose of LeadTrac is to help ICE HSI personnel conduct research and analysis using advanced analytic tools in support of their law enforcement mission. LeadTrac Overview This record system allows DHS to collect and maintain information about foreign students, exchange visitors, and other non-immigrant visitors to the United Sates who overstay their period of admission or otherwise violate the terms of their visa, immigrant, or non-immigrant status (collectively, status violators), and associated organizations and individuals. Using LeadTrac, the Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation Unit (CTCEU) collects personally identifiable information (PII) from key Department of Homeland Security (DHS) databases and analyzes it to identify individuals who are suspected status violators. The Counterterrorism and Criminal Exploitation Unit will also use LeadTrac to collect information about organizations such as schools, universities, and exchange visitor programs being investigated by CTCEU, as well as information about individuals, including designated school officials (DSOs) and associates of suspected status violators. ICE collects information in LeadTrac about suspected status violators and organizations to help enforce compliance with U.S. immigration laws. Specifically, the information is collected and used to support the following DHS activities: Investigating and determining immigration status and criminal history information of individuals; carrying out the appropriate enforcement activity required; identifying fraudulent schools and/or organizations and the people affiliated with the school or organization; providing HSI and ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) with viable lead information to further investigate suspected status violators; and carrying out the required enforcement activity. The CTCEU and Overstay Analysis Unit (OAU) personnel query a variety of DHS and non-DHS information systems and enter the results into LeadTrac to build a unified picture of an individual's entry/exit, visa, criminal and immigration history, and will comparably process information about associated individuals and organizations. Using this assembled information, CTCEU will determine which individuals or organizations warrant additional investigation for possible status violations or the operation of fraudulent institutions, and will request that the appropriate HSI field offices initiate investigations. Some of the individuals about whom ICE collects information in LeadTrac, such as DSOs and associates of suspected status violators, may have lawful permanent resident (LPR) status or be U.S. citizens. Consistent with the Department's information sharing mission, information stored in the DHS/ICE-015 [[Page 52594]] LeadTrac System of Records may be shared with other DHS components that have a need to know the information to carry out their national security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other homeland security functions. In addition, DHS/ICE information may be shared with appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or international government agencies consistent with the routine uses set forth in the system of records notice and as otherwise authorized under the Privacy Act. This newly established system will be included in DHS's inventory of record systems. II. Privacy Act The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a statutory framework governing the means by which Federal Government agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals' records. The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. As a matter of policy, DHS extends administrative Privacy Act protections to all individuals when systems of records maintain information on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and visitors. The Privacy Act allows Government agencies to exempt certain records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims an exemption, it must issue a rule to make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed, and provide an opportunity to comment. DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records. Some information in this system of records relates to official DHS national security, law enforcement, and immigration activities. These exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and law enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS's ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; and to protect the privacy of third parties. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable exemptions may be waived on a case-by-case basis. A system of records notice for DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records is also published in this issue of the Federal Register. List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5 Freedom of information; Privacy. For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION 0 1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows: Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a. 0 2. Add paragraph 74 to Appendix C to read as follows: Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy Act * * * * * 74. The DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used by ICE investigative and homeland security personnel. The DHS/ICE-015 LeadTrac System of Records contains aggregated data from ICE and DHS law enforcement and homeland security IT systems, as well as data uploaded by ICE personnel for analysis from various public, private, and commercial sources during the course of an investigation or analytical project. This information may include some or all of the following types of personally identifiable information: Identifying and biographic data such as name and date of birth; citizenship and immigration data; border crossing data; customs import-export history; criminal history; contact information; criminal associates; family relationships; photographs and other media; and employment and education information. The records also include tips received by ICE from the public concerning suspicious or potentially illegal activity, as well as telephone call detail records, which contain call transactions and subscriber data, obtained via lawful process during the course of an investigation. This information is maintained by ICE for analytical and investigative purposes and is made accessible to ICE personnel via the LeadTrac system interface. The system is used to conduct research supporting the production of law enforcement activities; provide lead information for investigative inquiry and follow-up; assist in the conduct of ICE criminal and administrative investigations; assist in the disruption of terrorist or other criminal activity; and discover previously unknown connections among existing ICE investigations. The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). When a record received from another system has been exempted in that source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or (k)(2), DHS will claim the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for the original primary systems of records from which they originated and claims any additional exemptions set forth here. Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons: (a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures) because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire investigative process. Disclosure of corrections or notations of dispute may impede investigations by requiring DHS to inform each witness or individual contacted during the investigation of each correction or notation pertaining to information provided them during the investigation. (b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to the records contained in this system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose classified and [[Page 52595]] other security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland security. (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of Information) because in the course of investigations into potential violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful activity. (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with that investigation and related law enforcement activities. (e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal the identity of witnesses or confidential informants. (f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this system are exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants. (g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on investigations. (h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence. (i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act. Dated: August 3, 2016. Jonathan R. Cantor, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2016-18812 Filed 8-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-28-P
![52593
Proposed Rules Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 153
Tuesday, August 9, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER Docket: For access to the docket to Counterterrorism and Criminal
contains notices to the public of the proposed read background documents or Exploitation Unit (CTCEU) collects
issuance of rules and regulations. The comments received, go to http:// personally identifiable information (PII)
purpose of these notices is to give interested www.regulations.gov. from key Department of Homeland
persons an opportunity to participate in the Security (DHS) databases and analyzes
rule making prior to the adoption of the final FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
rules. Amber Smith, Privacy Officer, (202– it to identify individuals who are
732–3300), U.S. Immigration and suspected status violators. The
Customs Enforcement, 500 12th Street Counterterrorism and Criminal
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SW., Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC Exploitation Unit will also use LeadTrac
SECURITY 20536, email: ICEPrivacy@dhs.gov, or to collect information about
Jonathan R. Cantor (202–343–1717), organizations such as schools,
Office of the Secretary Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy universities, and exchange visitor
Office, Department of Homeland programs being investigated by CTCEU,
6 CFR Part 5 Security, Washington, DC 20528. as well as information about
[Docket No. DHS–2016–0052] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
individuals, including designated
school officials (DSOs) and associates of
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of I. Background suspected status violators.
Exemptions; Department of Homeland The Department of Homeland ICE collects information in LeadTrac
Security/U.S. Immigration and Security (DHS) is giving concurrent about suspected status violators and
Customs Enforcement–015 LeadTrac notice of a newly established system of organizations to help enforce
System of Records records pursuant to the Privacy Act of compliance with U.S. immigration laws.
1974 for the ‘‘DHS/U.S. Immigration Specifically, the information is collected
AGENCY: Department of Homeland and used to support the following DHS
and Customs Enforcement (ICE)–015
Security (DHS), Privacy Office. activities: Investigating and determining
LeadTrac System of Records’’ and this
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. proposed rule. In this rulemaking, the immigration status and criminal history
Department proposes to exempt information of individuals; carrying out
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland the appropriate enforcement activity
Security is giving concurrent notice of a portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy required; identifying fraudulent schools
newly established system of records and/or organizations and the people
pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement affiliated with the school or
the ‘‘Department of Homeland Security/ organization; providing HSI and ICE
U.S. Immigration and Customs requirements.
The LeadTrac System of Records Enforcement and Removal Operations
Enforcement–015 LeadTrac System of (ERO) with viable lead information to
describes the operation of an ICE
Records’’ and this proposed rulemaking. further investigate suspected status
information technology system of the
In this proposed rulemaking, the violators; and carrying out the required
same name, which is owned by ICE’s
Department proposes to exempt enforcement activity.
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)
portions of the system of records from The CTCEU and Overstay Analysis
directorate. This system contains a
one or more provisions of the Privacy Unit (OAU) personnel query a variety of
repository of data that is ingested on a
Act because of criminal, civil, and DHS and non-DHS information systems
routine or ad hoc basis from other
administrative enforcement and enter the results into LeadTrac to
existing sources, and an index created
requirements. build a unified picture of an
from that data. LeadTrac incorporates
DATES: Comments must be received on tools that allow the data to be queried, individual’s entry/exit, visa, criminal
or before September 9, 2016. analyzed, and presented in a variety of and immigration history, and will
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, formats that can help illuminate comparably process information about
identified by docket number DHS– relationships among the various data associated individuals and
2016–0052, by one of the following elements. The purpose of LeadTrac is to organizations. Using this assembled
methods: help ICE HSI personnel conduct information, CTCEU will determine
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http:// research and analysis using advanced which individuals or organizations
www.regulations.gov. Follow the analytic tools in support of their law warrant additional investigation for
instructions for submitting comments. enforcement mission. possible status violations or the
• Fax: 202–343–4010. operation of fraudulent institutions, and
• Mail: Jonathan Cantor, Acting Chief LeadTrac Overview will request that the appropriate HSI
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, This record system allows DHS to field offices initiate investigations.
Department of Homeland Security, collect and maintain information about Some of the individuals about whom
foreign students, exchange visitors, and ICE collects information in LeadTrac,
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received other non-immigrant visitors to the such as DSOs and associates of
must include the agency name and United Sates who overstay their period suspected status violators, may have
docket number for this notice. All of admission or otherwise violate the lawful permanent resident (LPR) status
comments received will be posted terms of their visa, immigrant, or non- or be U.S. citizens.
without change to http:// immigrant status (collectively, status Consistent with the Department’s
www.regulations.gov, including any violators), and associated organizations information sharing mission,
personal information provided. and individuals. Using LeadTrac, the information stored in the DHS/ICE–015
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 Aug 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM 09AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_52746/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules 52595
other security-sensitive information that SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Washington, DC 20416; telephone: (202)
could be detrimental to homeland security. 205–7654; email: robert.carpenter@
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and 13 CFR Parts 115 and 120 sba.gov.
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential RIN 3245–AF85 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
violations of federal law, the accuracy of I. Background Information
information obtained or introduced Miscellaneous Amendments to
occasionally may be unclear, or the Business Loan Programs and Surety Executive Order 13563, Improving
information may not be strictly relevant or Bond Guarantee Program Regulation and Regulatory Review, 76
necessary to a specific investigation. In the FR 3821 (January 21, 2011), directs
interests of effective law enforcement, it is AGENCY: U.S. Small Business agencies to ensure that regulations are
appropriate to retain all information that may Administration. accessible, consistent, written in plain
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful ACTION: Proposed rule. language, and easy to understand in
activity. order to foster economic growth and job
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business creation. Executive Order 13563
Information from Individuals) because Administration (SBA) continues to provides that our regulatory system
requiring that information be collected from review the regulations governing the ‘‘must identify and use the best, most
the subject of an investigation would alert the delivery and oversight of its business innovative and least burdensome tools
subject to the nature or existence of the lending programs. SBA is proposing
investigation, thereby interfering with that for achieving regulatory ends.’’
changes to some of these regulations for Executive Order 13563 further provides
investigation and related law enforcement clarity and to increase participation in:
activities. that ‘‘[t]o facilitate the periodic review
The Surety Bond Guarantee (SBG) of existing significant regulations,
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
Program, the 7(a) Loan Program, the agencies shall consider how best to
information could impede law enforcement Microloan Program, and the promote retrospective analysis of rules
by compromising the existence of a Development Company Loan Program that may be outmoded, ineffective,
confidential investigation or reveal the (504 Loan Program). In addition, the insufficient, or excessively burdensome,
identity of witnesses or confidential proposed changes will streamline the and to modify, streamline, expand, or
informants. regulations by removing or revising any repeal them in accordance with what
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), outdated regulations. has been learned.’’ SBA has reviewed its
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) DATES: SBA must receive comments to regulations with regard to the Business
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
the proposed rule on or before October Loan Programs, as defined below, and is
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
11, 2016. proposing a number of amendments and
noted above, and therefore DHS is not ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, revisions to accomplish this goal.
required to establish requirements, rules, or identified by RIN 3245–AF85, by any of The SBA programs affected by this
procedures with respect to such access. the following methods: proposed rule are the 7(a) Loan Program
Providing notice to individuals with respect • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// authorized pursuant to section 7(a) of
to existence of records pertaining to them in www.regulations.gov. Follow the the Small Business Act (the Act) (15
the system of records or otherwise setting up instructions for submitting comments. U.S.C. 636(a)), the Microloan Program
procedures pursuant to which individuals • Mail: Mary Frias, Office of authorized pursuant to section 7(m) of
may access and view records pertaining to Financial Assistance, Office of Capital the Act (15 U.S.C. 636(m)), the Surety
themselves in the system would undermine Bond Guarantee Program authorized
Access, Small Business Administration,
investigative efforts and reveal the identities pursuant to part B of title IV of the
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416. Small Business Investment Act of 1958
confidential informants. (15 U.S.C. 694b et seq.), and the
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of • Hand Delivery/Courier: Mary Frias,
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of Development Company Program (the
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it Capital Access, Small Business 504 Loan Program) authorized pursuant
is impossible to determine in advance what Administration, 409 Third Street SW., to title V of the Small Business
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and Washington, DC 20416. Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) SBA will post all comments on et seq.) (collectively referred to as the
would preclude DHS agents from using their www.regulations.gov. If you wish to Business Loan Programs).
investigative training and exercise of good submit confidential business The Agency requests comments on all
judgment to both conduct and report on
information (CBI) as defined in the User aspects of the regulatory revisions in
investigations. this proposed rule and on any related
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Office of issues affecting the Business Loan
Individuals) because compliance would Programs.
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve, Financial Assistance, Office of Capital
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law Access, 409 Third Street SW., II. Summary of Proposed Business Loan
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed Washington, DC 20416. Highlight the Program Changes
under seal and could result in disclosure of information that you consider to be CBI SBA’s proposed changes are described
investigative techniques, procedures, and and explain why you believe SBA
evidence.
in this section, with additional details
should hold this information as on each located in the section-by-
(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) confidential. SBA will review the
to the extent that the system is exempt from section analysis that follows:
information and make the final
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act. A. Surety Bond Guarantee Program
determination whether it will publish
Dated: August 3, 2016. the information. 1. Threshold Change. SBA proposes
Jonathan R. Cantor,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to change the threshold amounts set
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Robert Carpenter, Financial Analyst, forth in §§ 115.19, 115.32, and 115.67
Homeland Security.
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of under which Sureties are required to
[FR Doc. 2016–18812 Filed 8–8–16; 8:45 am] Capital Access, Small Business notify SBA, or obtain SBA’s prior
BILLING CODE 9111–28–P Administration, 409 Third Street SW., written approval, of changes in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 Aug 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM 09AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_52746/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-09 01:10:21
Document Modified: 2016-08-09 01:10:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before September 9, 2016. | |
| Contact | Amber Smith, Privacy Officer, (202- 732-3300), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 500 12th Street SW., Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC 20536, email: [email protected], or Jonathan R. Cantor (202-343-1717), Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 52593 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR