81 FR 53308 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Louisiana; Interstate Transport of Air Pollution for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)

Page Range		53308-53309
FR Document		2016-19148

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is disapproving the portion of a Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal pertaining to interstate transport of air pollution which will significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in other states. Disapproval will establish a 2-year deadline, under Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(c), for the EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Louisiana to address the CAA interstate transport requirements pertaining to significant contribution to nonattainment and interference with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in other states, unless the EPA approves a SIP that meets these requirements. Disapproval does not start a mandatory sanctions clock for Louisiana.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53308-53309]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0464; FRL-9950-49-Region 6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Louisiana; Interstate Transport of Air Pollution for the 2008 Ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is disapproving the 
portion of a Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal 
pertaining to interstate transport of air pollution which will 
significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance 
of the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in 
other states. Disapproval will establish a 2-year deadline, under Clean 
Air Act (CAA) Section 110(c), for the EPA to promulgate a Federal 
Implementation Plan (FIP) for Louisiana to address the CAA interstate 
transport requirements pertaining to significant contribution to 
nonattainment and interference with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS 
in other states, unless the EPA approves a SIP that meets these 
requirements. Disapproval does not start a mandatory sanctions clock 
for Louisiana.

DATES: This rule is effective on September 12, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2013-0464. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure 
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available 
either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 
copy at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherry Fuerst 214-665-6454, 
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

    This rulemaking addresses an infrastructure SIP submittal from the 
State of Louisiana addressing, among other things, the requirements of 
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), also known as the good neighbor 
provision, with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The background for 
this action is discussed in detail in our June 7, 2016 proposal (81 FR 
36496). In that action we proposed to disapprove the portion of the 
June 4, 2013 Louisiana SIP submittal pertaining to CAA 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) which requires that the State prohibit the 
interstate transport of air pollution which will significantly 
contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2008 
ozone NAAQS in other states.
    In proposing to disapprove the State's SIP submittal as to the good 
neighbor provision, we noted two specific deficiencies in the Louisiana 
submission. First, Louisiana cited the State's approved Clean Air 
Interstate Rule (CAIR) SIP as support for its conclusion that the State 
satisfied its section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) obligation with respect to the 
2008 ozone NAAQS. However, as explained in our proposal, CAIR was 
invalidated by the D.C. Circuit in North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 
(2008). Even if Louisiana could rely on its CAIR SIP the modeling and 
rulemaking conducted for both CAIR, or its successor, the Cross-State 
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011) addressed the 
1997 ozone NAAQS, not the more stringent 2008 ozone NAAQS at issue in 
this action. Because the Louisiana submittal addressed by this action 
concerns the State's interstate transport obligations for a different 
and more stringent standard (the 2008 ozone NAAQS), we stated it is not 
sufficient to merely cite to older EPA or state implemented programs as 
evidence of compliance with the current 2008 ozone NAAQS. Second, the 
State's submittal lacked any technical analysis evaluating or 
demonstrating whether emissions in Louisiana impacts air quality in 
another state. As such, we proposed that the submittal did not provide 
us with a basis to agree with the State's conclusion that the State 
already has adequate provisions in the SIP to address CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. We did not 
receive any comments regarding our proposal.

II. Final Action

    EPA is disapproving a portion of a June 4, 2013 SIP submittal from 
Louisiana pertaining to interstate transport of air pollution which 
will significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with 
maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in other states. Disapproval will 
establish a 2-year deadline, under the CAA Section 110(c), for the EPA 
to promulgate a FIP for Louisiana to address the CAA interstate 
transport requirements pertaining to significant contribution to 
nonattainment and interference with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS 
in other states, unless the EPA approves a SIP that meets these 
requirements. Disapproval does not start a mandatory sanctions clock 
for Louisiana pursuant to CAA section 179 because this action does not 
pertain to a part D plan for nonattainment areas required under CAA 
section 110(a)(2)(I) or a SIP call pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(5).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive 
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This final action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' 
because it is not categorized as ``significant'' under section 3(f) of 
Executive Order 12866 and therefore was not submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This final action does not impose an information collection burden 
under the PRA because it does not contain any information collection 
activities.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This 
action merely disapprove a SIP submission as not meeting the CAA.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in 
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect 
small governments. The action imposes no

[[Page 53309]]

enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the 
private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have 
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between 
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13175. This action does not apply on any Indian 
reservation land, any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, or non-reservation areas of 
Indian country. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this 
action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks 
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect 
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in 
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to 
Executive Order 13045 because it merely disapproves a SIP submission as 
not meeting the CAA.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is 
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by 
this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse 
human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income or 
indigenous populations. This action merely disapproves a SIP submission 
as not meeting the CAA.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by October 11, 2016. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, and Ozone.

    Dated: July 29, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart T--Louisiana

0
2. Section 52.996 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  52.996  Disapprovals.

    (a) The portion of the SIP submitted on June 4, 2013 addressing 
Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS is 
disapproved.
    (b) [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2016-19148 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 53309

enforceable duty on any state, local or The Congressional Review Act, 5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
tribal governments or the private sector. U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small AGENCY
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 40 CFR Part 52
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
This action does not have federalism that before a rule may take effect, the [EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0704; FRL–9950–54–
implications. It will not have substantial agency promulgating the rule must Region 5]
direct effects on the states, on the submit a rule report, which includes a
relationship between the national copy of the rule, to each House of the Wisconsin; Approval/Disapproval of
government and the states, or on the Congress and to the Comptroller General Interstate Transport Requirements for
distribution of power and of the United States. The EPA will the 2008 Ozone NAAQS
responsibilities among the various submit a report containing this action
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
levels of government. and other required information to the
Agency (EPA).
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation ACTION: Final rule.
Representatives, and the Comptroller
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
General of the United States prior to SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Governments
publication of the rule in the Federal Agency (EPA) is partially approving and
This action does not have tribal Register. A major rule cannot take effect partially disapproving elements of State
implications as specified in Executive until 60 days after it is published in the Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
Order 13175. This action does not apply Federal Register. This action is not a from Wisconsin regarding the
on any Indian reservation land, any ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. infrastructure requirements of section
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 804(2). 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
has demonstrated that a tribe has Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 2008 ozone National Ambient Air
jurisdiction, or non-reservation areas of petitions for judicial review of this Quality Standards (NAAQS). The
Indian country. Thus, Executive Order action must be filed in the United States infrastructure requirements are designed
13175 does not apply to this action. Court of Appeals for the appropriate to ensure that the structural components
circuit by October 11, 2016. Filing a of each state’s air quality management
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of petition for reconsideration by the program are adequate to meet the state’s
Children From Environmental Health Administrator of this final rule does not responsibilities under the CAA. This
Risks and Safety Risks affect the finality of this action for the action pertains specifically to
The EPA interprets Executive Order purposes of judicial review nor does it infrastructure requirements concerning
13045 as applying only to those extend the time within which a petition interstate transport provisions for which
regulatory actions that concern for judicial review may be filed, and Wisconsin made a SIP submission that,
environmental health or safety risks that shall not postpone the effectiveness of among other things, certified that the
the EPA has reason to believe may such rule or action. This action may not existing SIP was sufficient to meet the
disproportionately affect children, per be challenged later in proceedings to interstate transport requirements for the
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory enforce its requirements. (See section 2008 ozone NAAQS.
action’’ in section 2–202 of the 307(b)(2).) DATES: This final rule is effective on
Executive Order. This action is not List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 September 12, 2016.
subject to Executive Order 13045 ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
because it merely disapproves a SIP Environmental protection, Air docket for this action under Docket ID
submission as not meeting the CAA. pollution control, Incorporation by No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0704. All
reference, and Ozone. documents in the docket are listed on
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Dated: July 29, 2016. the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Distribution or Use Ron Curry, Although listed in the index, some
Regional Administrator, Region 6. information is not publicly available,
This action is not subject to Executive i.e., Confidential Business Information
Order 13211, because it is not a 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: (CBI) or other information whose
significant regulatory action under PART 52—APPROVAL AND disclosure is restricted by statute.
Executive Order 12866. PROMULGATION OF Certain other material, such as
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS copyrighted material, is not placed on
I. National Technology Transfer and
the Internet and will be publicly
Advancement Act
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 available only in hard copy form.
This rulemaking does not involve continues to read as follows: Publicly available docket materials are
technical standards. available either through
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
www.regulations.gov or please contact
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal the person identified in the ‘‘For Further
Actions To Address Environmental Subpart T—Louisiana
Information Contact’’ section for
Justice in Minority Populations and additional availability information.
■ 2. Section 52.996 is revised to read as
Low-Income Populations
follows: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA believes the human health or Sarah Arra, Environmental Scientist,
§ 52.996 Disapprovals. Attainment Planning and Maintenance
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential (a) The portion of the SIP submitted Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES

disproportionately high and adverse on June 4, 2013 addressing Clean Air Environmental Protection Agency,
human health or environmental effects Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
on minority, low-income or indigenous ozone NAAQS is disapproved. Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–9401,
populations. This action merely (b) [Reserved] arra.sarah@epa.gov.
disapproves a SIP submission as not [FR Doc. 2016–19148 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
meeting the CAA. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Throughout this document whenever

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:21 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12AUR1.SGM 12AUR1

Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:32:54
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:32:54

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective on September 12, 2016.
Contact		Sherry Fuerst 214-665-6454, [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 53308
CFR Associated		Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference and Ozone