81 FR 53378 - Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Abengoa Bioenergy of Indiana, Commissioner's Order
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 53378-53379 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19030 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 53378-53379] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19030] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0724; FRL-9950-51-Region 5] Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Abengoa Bioenergy of Indiana, Commissioner's Order AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) on October 16, 2015. The submittal consists of an order issued by the Commissioner of IDEM (Commissioner's Order No. 2015-01) approving alternative control technology requirements for Abengoa Bioenergy of Indiana (Abengoa). These requirements include the use of a carbon adsorption/absorption hydrocarbon vapor recovery system with a minimum overall control efficiency of 98% to control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the ethanol loading racks at Abengoa. A continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS) must be used to monitor the carbon adsorption/absorption hydrocarbon vapor recovery system for breakthrough of VOC emissions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 12, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2015-0724, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jenny Liljegren, Physical Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR- 18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6832, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse [[Page 53379]] comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Dated: August 1, 2016. Robert A. Kaplan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2016-19030 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![53378 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
XI. Statutory and Executive Order implications and will not impose www.regulations.gov or via email to
Reviews substantial direct costs on tribal aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For
Under the CAA, the Administrator is governments or preempt tribal law as comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
required to approve a SIP submission specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 follow the online instructions for
that complies with the provisions of the FR 67249, November 9, 2000). submitting comments. Once submitted,
Act and applicable federal regulations comments cannot be edited or removed
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
[42 U.S.C. 7410(k), 40 CFR 52.02(a)]. from Regulations.gov. For either manner
Environmental protection, Air of submission, EPA may publish any
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices, comment received to its public docket.
Incorporation by reference, Do not submit electronically any
provided that they meet the criteria of Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed information you consider to be
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Confidential Business Information (CBI)
action merely approves some state law Reporting and recordkeeping
as meeting federal requirements and or other information whose disclosure is
requirements, and Volatile organic restricted by statute. Multimedia
disapproves other state law because it compounds.
does not meet federal requirements; this submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
proposed action does not impose Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. accompanied by a written comment.
additional requirements beyond those Dated: July 26, 2016.
The written comment is considered the
imposed by state law. For that reason, official comment and should include
Shaun L. McGrath,
this proposed action: discussion of all points you wish to
Regional Administrator, Region 8. make. EPA will generally not consider
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory [FR Doc. 2016–18878 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
action’’ subject to review by the Office comments or comment contents located
of Management and Budget under
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P outside of the primary submission (i.e.
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
Oct. 4, 1993); system). For additional submission
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION methods, please contact the person
• Does not impose an information AGENCY
collection burden under the provisions identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 40 CFR Part 52
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); full EPA public comment policy,
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0724; FRL–9950–51– information about CBI or multimedia
• Is certified as not having a Region 5]
significant economic impact on a submissions, and general guidance on
substantial number of small entities making effective comments, please visit
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Abengoa
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
Bioenergy of Indiana, Commissioner’s
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); commenting-epa-dockets.
Order
• Does not contain any unfunded FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mandate or significantly or uniquely AGENCY: Environmental Protection Jenny Liljegren, Physical Scientist,
affect small governments, as described Agency (EPA). Attainment Planning and Maintenance
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ACTION: Proposed rule. Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); Environmental Protection Agency,
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
• Does not have federalism Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6832,
implications as specified in Executive
revision to the Indiana State Liljegren.Jennifer@epa.gov.
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10,
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
1999);
the Indiana Department of
• Is not an economically significant Final Rules section of this Federal
Environmental Management (IDEM) on Register, EPA is approving the State’s
regulatory action based on health or
October 16, 2015. The submittal consists SIP submittal as a direct final rule
safety risks subject to Executive Order
of an order issued by the Commissioner without prior proposal because the
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
of IDEM (Commissioner’s Order No.
• Is not a significant regulatory action Agency views this as a noncontroversial
2015–01) approving alternative control submittal and anticipates no adverse
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
technology requirements for Abengoa comments. A detailed rationale for the
28355, May 22, 2001);
Bioenergy of Indiana (Abengoa). These
• Is not subject to requirements of approval is set forth in the direct final
requirements include the use of a rule. If no adverse comments are
Section 12(d) of the National
carbon adsorption/absorption received in response to this rule, no
Technology Transfer and Advancement
hydrocarbon vapor recovery system further activity is contemplated. If EPA
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
with a minimum overall control receives adverse comments, the direct
application of those requirements would
efficiency of 98% to control volatile final rule will be withdrawn and all
be inconsistent with the CAA; and,
• Does not provide the EPA with the organic compound (VOC) emissions public comments received will be
discretionary authority to address, as from the ethanol loading racks at addressed in a subsequent final rule
appropriate, disproportionate human Abengoa. A continuous emissions based on this proposed rule. EPA will
health or environmental effects, using monitoring system (CEMS) must be used not institute a second comment period.
practicable and legally permissible to monitor the carbon adsorption/ Any parties interested in commenting
methods, under Executive Order 12898 absorption hydrocarbon vapor recovery on this action should do so at this time.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994). system for breakthrough of VOC Please note that if EPA receives adverse
The SIP is not approved to apply on emissions. comment on an amendment, paragraph,
any Indian reservation land or in any DATES: Comments must be received on or section of this rule and if that
other area where the EPA or an Indian or before September 12, 2016. provision may be severed from the
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– as final those provisions of the rule that
Country, the rule does not have tribal OAR–2015–0724, at http:// are not the subject of an adverse
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:23 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM 12AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53534/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules 53379
comment. For additional information, Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, regulations, and policies. To help
see the direct final rule which is located DC 20460–0001; main telephone address potential environmental justice
in the Rules section of this Federal number: (703) 305–7090; email address: issues, the Agency seeks information on
Register. RDFRNotices@epa.gov. any groups or segments of the
Dated: August 1, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: population who, as a result of their
location, cultural practices, or other
Robert A. Kaplan, I. General Information factors, may have atypical or
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
A. Does this action apply to me? disproportionately high and adverse
[FR Doc. 2016–19030 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am] human health impacts or environmental
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P You may be potentially affected by effects from exposure to the pesticides
this action if you are an agricultural discussed in this document, compared
producer, food manufacturer, or to the general population.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION pesticide manufacturer. The following
AGENCY list of North American Industrial II. What action is the agency taking?
Classification System (NAICS) codes is EPA is announcing its receipt of
40 CFR Part 180 not intended to be exhaustive, but rather several pesticide petitions filed under
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0008; FRL–9949–53] provides a guide to help readers section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug,
determine whether this document and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C.
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions applies to them. Potentially affected 346a, requesting the establishment or
Filed for Residues of Pesticide entities may include: modification of regulations in 40 CFR
Chemicals in or on Various • Crop production (NAICS code 111). part 180 for residues of pesticide
Commodities • Animal production (NAICS code chemicals in or on various food
112). commodities. The Agency is taking
AGENCY: Environmental Protection • Food manufacturing (NAICS code public comment on the requests before
Agency (EPA). 311). responding to the petitioners. EPA is not
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS proposing any particular action at this
request for comment. code 32532). time. EPA has determined that the
If you have any questions regarding pesticide petitions described in this
SUMMARY: This document announces the the applicability of this action to a document contain the data or
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings particular entity, consult the person information prescribed in FFDCA
of pesticide petitions requesting the listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section 408(d)(2), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(2);
establishment or modification of CONTACT for the division listed at the however, EPA has not fully evaluated
regulations for residues of pesticide end of the pesticide petition summary of the sufficiency of the submitted data at
chemicals in or on various commodities. interest. this time or whether the data support
DATES: Comments must be received on granting of the pesticide petitions. After
B. What should I consider as I prepare
or before September 12, 2016. considering the public comments, EPA
my comments for EPA?
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, intends to evaluate whether and what
identified by docket identification (ID) 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this action may be warranted. Additional
number and the pesticide petition information to EPA through data may be needed before EPA can
number (PP) of interest as shown in the regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark make a final determination on these
body of this document, by one of the the part or all of the information that pesticide petitions.
following methods: you claim to be CBI. For CBI Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// information in a disk or CD–ROM that summary of each of the petitions that
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the are the subject of this document,
instructions for submitting comments. disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then prepared by the petitioner, is included
Do not submit electronically any identify electronically within the disk or in a docket EPA has created for each
information you consider to be CD–ROM the specific information that rulemaking. The docket for each of the
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is claimed as CBI. In addition to one petitions is available at http://
or other information whose disclosure is complete version of the comment that www.regulations.gov.
restricted by statute. includes information claimed as CBI, a As specified in FFDCA section
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental copy of the comment that does not 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), EPA is
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ contain the information claimed as CBI publishing notice of the petition so that
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. must be submitted for inclusion in the the public has an opportunity to
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. public docket. Information so marked comment on this request for the
• Hand Delivery: To make special will not be disclosed except in establishment or modification of
arrangements for hand delivery or accordance with procedures set forth in regulations for residues of pesticides in
delivery of boxed information, please 40 CFR part 2. or on food commodities. Further
follow the instructions at http:// 2. Tips for preparing your comments. information on the petition may be
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. When preparing and submitting your obtained through the petition summary
comments, see the commenting tips at referenced in this unit.
Additional instructions on commenting http://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 1. PP 6F8443. (EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–
or visiting the docket, along with more 0561). ISK Biosciences Corporation,
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
comments.html.
information about dockets generally, is 3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 7470 Auburn Road, Suite A, Concord,
available at http://www.epa.gov/ achieve environmental justice, the fair Ohio, 44077, requests to establish a
dockets. treatment and meaningful involvement tolerance for residues of the combined
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of any group, including minority and/or residues of the insecticide flonicamid
Susan Lewis, Registration Division low-income populations, in the [N-(cyanomethyl)-4-trifluoromethyl)-3-
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, development, implementation, and pyridinecarboxamide (CA) or N-
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 enforcement of environmental laws, cyanomethyl-4-
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:23 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\12AUP1.SGM 12AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53534/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:33:05
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:33:05
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before September 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jenny Liljegren, Physical Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR- 18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6832, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 53378 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR