81 FR 53404 - Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 53404-53406 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19129 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 53404-53406] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19129] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-475-818] Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain pasta (pasta) from Italy, covering the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. The initiation of the instant review covered 31 companies, and we have partially rescinded the review with respect to nine companies, as discussed below. Thus, this review covers two mandatory respondents, Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) and Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 (Liguori), and 19 non-selected companies. We preliminarily determine that Indalco and Liguori made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR). Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective August 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. Background On September 2, 2015, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping order on pasta from Italy.\1\ On December 24, 2015, the Department rescinded the instant review, in part, with respect to La Molisana SpA., Pasta Lensi S.r.L., Pastificio Andalini S.p.A., Azienda Agricola Casina Rossa di De Laurentiis Nicola, Pastificio Bolognese of Angelo R. Dicuonzo, I Sapori dell'Arca S.r.l., La Romagna S.r.l., Ser.com.snc, and Vero Lucano S.r.l.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 53106 (September 2, 2015) (Initiation Notice). \2\ See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 80 FR 80320 (December 24, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Government. As a result, the revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review was April 7, 2016.\3\ On March 17, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the preliminary results to August 5, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm `Jonas,' '' dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with the Department's practice, the deadline will become the next business day. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta. The merchandise subject to review is currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Pasta From Italy; 2014-2015,'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 53405]] Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price or export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum dated concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, the Department calculated a weighted- average dumping margin of 2.14 percent for Indalco and 5.74 percent for Liguori for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the Department assigned the weighted-average of these two calculated weighted-average dumping margins, 3.19 percent, to the 19 non-selected companies in these preliminary results, as referenced below.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The rate applied to the non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin calculated based on the publicly- ranged U.S. volumes of the two reviewed companies with an affirmative dumping margin, for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. See Memorandum to the File titled, ``Certain Pasta From Italy: Margin for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination,'' dated concurrently with this notice. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer and/or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Industria Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco)............... 2.14 Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 (Liguori) \6\.................... 5.74 Agritalia S.r.L. (Agritalia)................................. 3.19 Atar S.r.L. (Atar)........................................... 3.19 Corticella Molini e Pastifici S.p.A. (Corticella)............ 3.19 Delverde Industrie Alimentari S.p.A. (Delverde).............. 3.19 Domenico Paone fu Erasmo S.p.A. (Domenico)................... 3.19 F. Divella S.p.A. (F. Divella)............................... 3.19 La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gragnano S.a.s. di Antonio Moccia 3.19 (La Fabbrica)............................................... Molino e Pastificio Tomasello S.r.L. (Tomasello)............. 3.19 P.A.P SNC DI Pazienza G.B. & C. (P.A.P)...................... 3.19 Pasta Zara S.p.A. (Pasta Zara)............................... 3.19 Pastificio Carmine Russo S.p.A. (Carmine).................... 3.19 Pastificio DiMartino Gaetano & F. Ili S.r.L. (DiMartino)..... 3.19 Pastificio Fabianelli S.p.A. (Fabianelli).................... 3.19 Pastificio Felicetti S.r.L. (Felicetti)...................... 3.19 Pastificio Labor S.r.L. (Labor).............................. 3.19 Pastificio Riscossa F. Ili Mastromauro S.p.A. (AKA Pastificio 3.19 Riscossa F. Ili. Mastromauro S.r.L.) (Riscossa)............. Poiatti S.p.A. (Poiatti)..................................... 3.19 Premiato Pastificio Afreltra S.r. L. (Premiato).............. 3.19 Rustichella d'Abruzzo S.p.A. (Rustichella)................... 3.19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Assessment Rate Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for Indalco or Liguori is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de minimis. Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review where applicable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The Department previously found that Liguori and PAM are affiliated and calculated a margin for the consolidated entity. See, e.g., Notice of Preliminary Results And Partial Rescission Of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review And Intent To Revoke The Antidumping Duty Order In Part, 66 FR 34414 (June 28, 2001) unchanged in Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order in Part: Certain Pasta From Italy, 67 FR 300 (January 3, 2002). In the instant review, Liguori reported that PAM ceased its operations as of October 24, 2014, and that PAM did not make any sales of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. See Liguori's Section A questionnaire response dated December 4, 2015 at 2. We intend to follow-up with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) concerning Liguori's statement subsequent to these preliminary results and to allow interested parties an opportunity to comment on any information received from CBP. Therefore, for purposes of these preliminary results, we have preliminarily assigned PAM the same rate as Liguori, rather than making a preliminary no shipments determination with respect to PAM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the Department's ``automatic assessment'' practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate [[Page 53406]] will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 15.45 percent, the all-others rate established in the antidumping investigation as modified by the section 129 determination.\7\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in US-- Zeroing (EC): Notice of Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to this proceeding the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\8\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\9\ Parties who submit comments are requested to submit: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, using Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS system within 30 days of publication of this notice.\10\ Requests should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be determined.\11\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the issues raised by the parties in their case briefs, within 120 days after issuance of these preliminary results. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of the antidumping duties by the amount of antidumping duties reimbursed. These preliminary results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 5, 2016. Ronald Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of Methodology Date of Sale Comparisons to Normal Value Product Comparisons Determination of Comparison Method Results of the Differential Pricing (DP) Analysis Export Price Normal Value A. Home Market Viability B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliated Customers D. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Home Market Prices 3. Results of the COP Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Price-to-CV Comparison G. Constructed Value Margins for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination Currency Conversion 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-19129 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![53404 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
Background Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–96, Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD
Title VI, 126 Stat. 156 (codified at 47 Wisconsin, and Wyoming. The Draft Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.)) (the ‘‘Act’’) created PEIS analyzes potential impacts of the Compliance, International Trade
and authorized FirstNet to take all deployment and operation of the Administration, U.S. Department of
actions necessary to ensure the building, NPSBN on the natural and human Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
deployment, and operation of an environment in the Central Region, in Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
interoperable, nationwide public safety accordance with FirstNet’s telephone: (202) 482–1168 or (202) 482–
broadband network (‘‘NPSBN’’) based responsibilities under NEPA. 1167, respectively.
on a single, national network Next Steps Background
architecture. The Act meets a
longstanding and critical national All comments received by the public On September 2, 2015, the
infrastructure need, to create a single, and any interested stakeholders will be Department published a notice of
nationwide network that will, for the evaluated and considered by FirstNet initiation of an administrative review of
first time, allow police officers, fire during the preparation of the Final PEIS. the antidumping order on pasta from
fighters, emergency medical service Once a PEIS is completed and a Record Italy.1 On December 24, 2015, the
professionals, and other public safety of Decision (ROD) is signed, FirstNet Department rescinded the instant
entities to effectively communicate with will evaluate site-specific review, in part, with respect to La
each other across agencies and documentation, as network design is Molisana SpA., Pasta Lensi S.r.L.,
jurisdictions. The NPSBN is intended to developed, to determine if the proposed Pastificio Andalini S.p.A., Azienda
enhance the ability of the public safety project has been adequately evaluated in Agricola Casina Rossa di De Laurentiis
community to perform more reliably, the PEIS or warrants a Categorical Nicola, Pastificio Bolognese of Angelo
effectively, and safely; increase Exclusion, an Environmental R. Dicuonzo, I Sapori dell’Arca S.r.l., La
situational awareness during an Assessment, or an Environmental Romagna S.r.l., Ser.com.snc, and Vero
emergency; and improve the ability of Impact Statement. Lucano S.r.l.2
the public safety community to Dated: August 9, 2016. As explained in the memorandum
effectively engage in those critical Genevieve Walker, from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
activities. Director of Environmental Compliance, First
Enforcement and Compliance, the
The National Environmental Policy Responder Network Authority. Department exercised its discretion to
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4347) toll all administrative deadlines due to
[FR Doc. 2016–19265 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
(‘‘NEPA’’) requires federal agencies to a closure of the Federal Government. As
BILLING CODE 3510–TL–P
undertake an assessment of a result, the revised deadline for the
environmental effects of their proposed preliminary results of this review was
actions prior to making a final decision DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE April 7, 2016.3 On March 17, 2016, the
and implementing the action. NEPA Department extended the deadline for
requirements apply to any federal International Trade Administration the preliminary results to August 5,
project, decision, or action that may 2016.
[A–475–818]
have a significant impact on the quality Scope of the Order
of the human environment. NEPA also Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Imports covered by the order are
establishes the Council on Results of Antidumping Duty shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta.
Environmental Quality (‘‘CEQ’’), which Administrative Review; 2014–2015 The merchandise subject to review is
issued regulations implementing the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, currently classifiable under items
procedural provisions of NEPA (see 40
International Trade Administration, 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
CFR parts 1500–1508). Among other
Department of Commerce. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
considerations, CEQ regulations at 40
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
United States (HTSUS). Although the
CFR 1508.28 recommend the use of
interested parties, the Department of HTSUS subheadings are provided for
tiering from a ‘‘broader environmental
Commerce (the Department) is convenience and customs purposes, the
impact statement (such as a national
conducting an administrative review of written description of the merchandise
program or policy statements) with
the antidumping duty order on certain subject to the order is dispositive.4
subsequent narrower statements or
environmental analysis (such as pasta (pasta) from Italy, covering the 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
regional or basin wide statements or period July 1, 2014, through June 30, Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
ultimately site-specific statements) 2015. The initiation of the instant 53106 (September 2, 2015) (Initiation Notice).
incorporating by reference the general review covered 31 companies, and we 2 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Partial
discussions and concentrating solely on have partially rescinded the review with Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 80 FR 80320 (December 24, 2015).
the issues specific to the statement respect to nine companies, as discussed 3 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
subsequently prepared.’’ below. Thus, this review covers two Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Due to the geographic scope of mandatory respondents, Industria Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of
FirstNet (all 50 states, the District of Alimentare Colavita S.p.A. (Indalco) Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the
Columbia, and five territories) and the and Liguori Pastificio Dal 1820 Government Closure During Snowstorm ‘Jonas,’ ’’
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
dated January 27, 2016. If the new deadline falls on
diversity of ecosystems potentially (Liguori), and 19 non-selected a non-business day, in accordance with the
traversed by the project, FirstNet has companies. We preliminarily determine Department’s practice, the deadline will become the
elected to prepare five regional PEISs. that Indalco and Liguori made sales of next business day.
4 For a full description of the scope of the order,
The five PEISs were divided into the subject merchandise at less than normal
see the ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
East, Central, West, South, and Non- value during the period of review (POR). Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Contiguous Regions. The Central Region Interested parties are invited to Review: Certain Pasta From Italy; 2014–2015,’’ from
consists of Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, comment on these preliminary results. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53560/page/1.svg)
![53406 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
will be the rate established for the most final results of this administrative DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
recently completed segment of this review, including the results of our
proceeding for the producer of the analysis of the issues raised by the International Trade Administration
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash parties in their case briefs, within 120 [A–602–809]
deposit rate for all other producers or days after issuance of these preliminary
exporters will continue to be 15.45 results. Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
percent, the all-others rate established From Australia: Final Determination of
in the antidumping investigation as Notification to Importers Sales at Less Than Fair Value
modified by the section 129
This notice serves as a preliminary AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
determination.7 These cash deposit
reminder to importers of their International Trade Administration,
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice. responsibility under 19 CFR Department of Commerce.
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
Disclosure and Public Comment regarding the reimbursement of determines that certain hot-rolled steel
The Department will disclose to antidumping duties prior to liquidation flat products from Australia are being,
parties to this proceeding the of the relevant entries during this or are likely to be, sold in the United
calculations performed in reaching the review period. Failure to comply with States at less than fair value. The period
preliminary results within five days of this requirement could result in the of investigation is July 1, 2014, through
the date of publication of these Secretary’s presumption that June 30, 2015. The final estimated
preliminary results.8 Pursuant to 19 CFR reimbursement of antidumping duties weighted-average dumping margins are
351.309(c), interested parties may occurred and increase the subsequent listed below in the ‘‘Final
submit cases briefs not later than 30 assessment of the antidumping duties Determination’’ section of this notice.
days after the date of publication of this by the amount of antidumping duties DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues reimbursed. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
raised in the case briefs, may be filed Frances Veith, AD/CVD Operations,
not later than five days after the date for These preliminary results of review
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
filing case briefs.9 Parties who submit are issued and published in accordance International Trade Administration,
comments are requested to submit: (1) A with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
statement of the issue; (2) a brief the Act. Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
summary of the argument; and (3) a Dated: August 5, 2016. Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
table of authorities. All briefs must be Ronald Lorentzen, 482–4295.
filed electronically using ACCESS. An Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
electronically filed document must be and Compliance.
received successfully in its entirety by Background
the Department’s electronic records Appendix The Department of Commerce (the
system, ACCESS. ‘‘Department’’) published the
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Interested parties who wish to request preliminary determination on March 22,
Decision Memorandum
a hearing must submit a written request 2016.1 A summary of the events that
to the Assistant Secretary for 1. Summary occurred since the Department
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. 2. Background published the Preliminary
Department of Commerce, using 3. Scope of the Order Determination, as well as a full
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 4. Discussion of Methodology discussion of the issues raised by parties
system within 30 days of publication of Date of Sale for this final determination, may be
this notice.10 Requests should contain Comparisons to Normal Value found in the final Issues and Decision
the party’s name, address, and Product Comparisons Memorandum.2
Determination of Comparison Method
telephone number, the number of Scope of the Investigation
Results of the Differential Pricing (DP)
participants, and a list of the issues to
Analysis The products covered by this
be discussed. If a request for a hearing
Export Price investigation are certain hot-rolled steel
is made, we will inform parties of the
Normal Value flat products (‘‘hot-rolled steel’’) from
scheduled date for the hearing which
A. Home Market Viability Australia. For a full description of the
will be held at the U.S. Department of
B. Level of Trade scope of this investigation, see the
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
C. Sales to Affiliated Customers ‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at D. Cost of Production Analysis
a time and location to be determined.11 Appendix II of this notice.
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
Parties should confirm by telephone the 2. Test of Home Market Prices 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
date, time, and location of the hearing. 3. Results of the COP Test Australia: Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Unless the deadline is extended E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of Comparison Market Prices Determination, 81 FR 15241 (March 22, 2016)
the Act, the Department will issue the (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’) and accompanying
F. Price-to-CV Comparison Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
7 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO
G. Constructed Value 2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Margins for Companies Not Selected for Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): Notice of
Individual Examination Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Determinations Under Section 129 of the Uruguay
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Round Agreements Act and Revocations and Partial Currency Conversion
Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Revocations of Certain Antidumping Duty Orders, 5. Recommendation Memorandum for the Final Affirmative
72 FR 25261 (May 4, 2007).
8 See 19 CFR 351.224(b). [FR Doc. 2016–19129 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am] Determination in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Products from Australia,’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with this
11 See 19 CFR 351.310. determination and hereby adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53560/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:33:18
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:33:18
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective August 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Joy Zhang or George McMahon, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 1168 or (202) 482-1167, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 53404 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR