81 FR 53412 - Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, in Part, and Partial Rescission; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 53412-53414 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19250 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 53412-53414] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19250] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-849] Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, in Part, and Partial Rescission; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective August 12, 2016. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cut-to- length carbon steel plate (``CTL plate'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period of review (``POR'') November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. We preliminarily find that of the two companies under review, one made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR and the other company has not demonstrated its eligibility for separate rate status, and, thus, is part of the PRC- wide entity. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3518. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background After initiating this review,\1\ the Department issued an antidumping duty questionnaire to Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (``Hunan Valin''), which notified the Department that it would not respond to the questionnaire. The other respondent, Wuyang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (``Wuyang Steel'') reported that it made no exports, sales, or entries during the POR. All review requests were timely withdrawn for the other 14 companies for which this review was initiated. For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum hereby adopted by, this notice.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 739 (January 7, 2016) (``Initiation Notice''). \2\ See the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with this notice (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. The Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the closure of the Federal Government because of Snowstorm ``Jonas''. Thus, all of the deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of review is now August 5, 2016.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure during Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate from the PRC.\4\ This merchandise is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') under item numbers 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7212.40.5000, and 7212.50.0000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Partial Rescission Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an [[Page 53413]] administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Nucor Corporation (``Petitioner''), the only party to request a review of the companies listed below, withdrew its request for an administrative review of these 14 companies within 90 days of the date of publication of Initiation Notice.\5\ Accordingly, the Department is rescinding this review, in part, with respect to the following companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1): \6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Commerce ``Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,'' dated April 6, 2016. \6\ As stated in Change in Practice in NME Reviews, the Department will no longer consider the non-market economy (``NME'') entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013) (``Change in Practice in NME Reviews''). The PRC-wide entity is not subject to this administrative review because no interested party requested a review of the entity. See Initiation Notice. Fujitrans Corporation Guangzhou Metals and Minerals Imp. & Exp. Ltd. Guardian Shanghai Hong Kong Shengyu Trading Co. Ltd. Hong Kong Zhong Yuan Industrial Co., Ltd. Jiangyin Xingcheng Plastic Chemical Co., Ltd. Jiangyin Xingcheng Special Steel Works Co., Ltd. Ningbo Jiangdong Trusty Import and Export Co., Ltd. Shanghai Ruyi Import and Export Co., Ltd. Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Wins Technology Co., Ltd. UBI Logistics China Limited Wuxi Philloy Machinery Co., Ltd. Xiamen C&D Paper & Pulp Co., Ltd. Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). For a full discussion of the decisions taken in these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review As noted above, Hunan Valin did not respond to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaire. Therefore, the Department preliminarily determines that Hunan Valin has not demonstrated its eligibility for separate rate status and is part of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ The PRC- wide entity rate is 128.59 percent.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \8\ See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's Republic of China, 62 FR 61964 (November 20, 1997). Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this segment of the proceeding, the entity's rate is not subject to change. See Change in Practice in NME Reviews. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Wuyang Steel submitted a timely-filed certification that it had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR.\9\ A query of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data did not show any POR entries of subject merchandise from Wuyang Steel.\10\ In addition, CBP did not identify any entries of subject merchandise from Wuyang Steel during the POR in response to an inquiry from the Department asking CBP for such information.\11\ Based on the foregoing, the Department preliminarily determines that Wuyang Steel did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Letter from Wuyang Steel to the Secretary of Commerce ``Administrative Review of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from China: Wuyang Iron & Steel's No Shipment Certification,'' dated January 15, 2016. \10\ See letter from Howard Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance to interested parties dated January 21, 2016. \11\ See CBP Message Number 6155301 dated June 3, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with its practice in NME cases, the Department is not rescinding this administrative review for Wuyang Steel, but intends to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review. Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this review are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties, who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, filed electronically using ACCESS. Electronically filed case briefs/ written comments and hearing requests must be received successfully in their entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those issues raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date of the hearing which will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\13\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. The Department intends to instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of subject merchandise from Hunan Valin at 128.59 percent (the PRC-wide rate). Additionally, pursuant to the Department's practice in NME cases, if we continue to determine that Wuyang Steel had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR from Wuyang Steel will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \14\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For companies for which the review has been rescinded, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on entries of subject merchandise at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from [[Page 53414]] warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been granted a separate rate, including Hunan Valin, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 128.59 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 5, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Sections in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Partial Rescission Discussion of the Methodology Non-Market Economy Country Status Separate Rates Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Allegation of Duty Evasion Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-19250 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![53412 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
Comment 10: Whether the Department DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Should Make an Adjustment for Nippon hereby adopted by, this notice.2
Group’s Purchases of Iron Ore at Below International Trade Administration The Preliminary Decision
Market Value Memorandum is a public document and
Comment 11: Whether the Department [A–570–849] is on file electronically via Enforcement
Should Accept Nippon Group’s Value- and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Added Calculation and Its Unreported Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Countervailing Duty Centralized
Further-Manufactured U.S. sales Plate From the People’s Republic of Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
Comment 12: Further Manufacturing China: Preliminary Results of ACCESS is available to registered users
Financial Expense Ratio Antidumping Administrative Review, at http://access.trade.gov and in the
Comment 13: General & Administrative Preliminary Determination of No Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
Expense Ratio Shipments, in Part, and Partial main Department of Commerce
JFE Group Rescission; 2014–2015 building. In addition, a complete
Comment 14: Whether the Department version of the Preliminary Results
Erred in Applying Adverse Facts AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Decision Memorandum can be accessed
Available to Certain Downstream Home International Trade Administration, directly on the Internet at http://
Market Sales Department of Commerce. enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
Comment 15: Whether Adverse Facts The signed and the electronic versions
Available is Warranted for Other DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
of the Preliminary Decision
Unreported Downstream Sales SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Memorandum are identical in content.
Comment 16: Whether Shoji America’s (‘‘Department’’) is conducting an The Department has exercised its
Indirect Selling Expense Should be administrative review of the discretion to toll all administrative
Increased antidumping duty order on certain cut- deadlines due to the closure of the
Comment 17: Whether Shoji America’s to-length carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL Federal Government because of
Freight Expense Should be Increased plate’’) from the People’s Republic of Snowstorm ‘‘Jonas’’. Thus, all of the
Comment 18: Whether Verification Minor China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of deadlines in this segment of the
Corrections Should be Incorporated into review (‘‘POR’’) November 1, 2014,
the Final Determination
proceeding have been extended by four
through October 31, 2015. We business days. The revised deadline for
Comment 19: Whether the Department preliminarily find that of the two
Erred by Resetting JFES’s Reported Home
the preliminary results of review is now
companies under review, one made no August 5, 2016.3
Market Credit Expense shipments of subject merchandise
Comment 20: Whether the Department during the POR and the other company Scope of the Order
Should Apply a CEP Offset on JFE’s CEP has not demonstrated its eligibility for The product covered by the order is
Sales separate rate status, and, thus, is part of
Comment 21: Whether the Department
certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate
the PRC-wide entity. Interested parties from the PRC.4 This merchandise is
Should Exclude Sales by CSI from its are invited to comment on these
Antidumping Calculation
currently classified in the Harmonized
preliminary results. Tariff Schedule of the United States
Comment 22: Whether the Department
Should Continue to Apply AFA to the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers
Cost of Inputs Supplied by JFE Shoji Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060,
Comment 23: Whether the Department Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
Erred in Applying the Transactions International Trade Administration, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
Disregarded Adjustment U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
Comment 24: Whether the Department Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 7210.70.3000, 7212.40.5000, and
Should Adjust JFE’s COM for Non-Prime Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 7212.50.0000. Although the HTSUS
Products 482–3518. subheadings are provided for
Comment 25: Whether the Department convenience and customs purposes, the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Should Increase JFE’s COM for written description of the scope of the
Reconciliation Differences Background order is dispositive.
Tokyo Steel Partial Rescission
Comment 26: Whether the Department’s After initiating this review,1 the
Refusal to Select Tokyo Steel as a Department issued an antidumping duty Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Mandatory Respondent Is Unlawful questionnaire to Hunan Valin Xiangtan Department will rescind an
Comment 27: Whether the Department Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hunan
Should Correct the Clerical Error in Its Valin’’), which notified the Department 2 See the memorandum from Christian Marsh,
Preliminary Results that it would not respond to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
questionnaire. The other respondent, Countervailing Duty Operations to Ronald K.
IX. Recommendation Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Wuyang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuyang Enforcement and Compliance ‘‘Decision
[FR Doc. 2016–19378 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
Steel’’) reported that it made no exports, Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
sales, or entries during the POR. All Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
review requests were timely withdrawn Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the
People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently
for the other 14 companies for which with this notice (‘‘Preliminary Decision
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
this review was initiated. For a Memorandum’’).
complete description of the events that 3 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
followed the initiation of this Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of
administrative review, see the Administrative Deadlines as a Result of the
Government Closure during Snowstorm Jonas,’’
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and dated January 27, 2016.
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 4 For a complete description of the scope of the
739 (January 7, 2016) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). order see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53568/page/1.svg)
![53414 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
warehouse, for consumption, in Allegation of Duty Evasion Rescission of Administrative Review in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Recommendation Part
[FR Doc. 2016–19250 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
Cash Deposit Requirements We are rescinding the administrative
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The following cash deposit review in part with respect to
requirements will be effective upon PhosAgro.1
publication of the final results of this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
administrative review for all shipments Methodology
of the subject merchandise entered, or International Trade Administration The Department conducted these
withdrawn from warehouse, for reviews in accordance with section
consumption on or after the publication 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
[A–821–801]
date of the final results of review, as amended (the Act). Export and
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Solid Urea From the Russian constructed export price are calculated
Act: (1) For previously investigated or Federation: Preliminary Results of in accordance with section 772(a) and
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters Antidumping Duty Administrative and
which are not under review in this 772(b) of the Act respectively. Normal
New Shipper Reviews and Rescission value is calculated in accordance with
segment of the proceeding but which of Administrative Review, in Part;
have separate rates, the cash deposit rate section 773(c) of the Act.
2014–2015
will continue to be the exporter-specific For a full description of the
rate published for the most recent AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, methodology underlying our
period; (2) for all PRC exporters of International Trade Administration, conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
subject merchandise that have not been Department of Commerce. Memorandum.2 The Preliminary
granted a separate rate, including Hunan Decision Memorandum is a public
Valin, the cash deposit rate will be the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce document and is made available to the
PRC-wide rate of 128.59 percent; and (3) (the Department) is conducting an public via Enforcement and
for all non-PRC exporters of subject administrative review and new shipper Compliance’s Antidumping and
merchandise which have not received review of the antidumping duty order Countervailing Duty Centralized
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will on solid urea from the Russian Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
be the rate applicable to the PRC Federation (Russia). The period of ACCESS is available to registered users
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC review (POR) is July 1, 2014, through at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
exporter. These deposit requirements, June 30, 2015. The Department parties in the Central Records Unit,
when imposed, shall remain in effect preliminarily finds that MCC EuroChem located at room B8024 of the main
until further notice. and Joint Stock Company PhosAgro- Department of Commerce building. In
Cherepovets (PhosAgro) have not made
Notification to Importers addition, a complete version of the
sales of subject merchandise in the
This notice also serves as a Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
United States at prices below normal
preliminary reminder to importers of be found at http://
value. Interested parties are invited to
their responsibility under 19 CFR enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
comment on these preliminary results.
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate A list of the topics discussed in the
regarding the reimbursement of DATES: Effective August 12, 2016. Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
antidumping duties prior to liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
of the relevant entries during this Michael Romani or Andre Gziryan, AD/ Preliminary Results of the
review period. Failure to comply with CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Administrative Review
this requirement could result in the and Compliance, International Trade
Department’s presumption that Administration, U.S. Department of As a result of this administrative
reimbursement of antidumping duties Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue review, we preliminarily determine that
occurred and the subsequent assessment NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: a weighted-average dumping margin of
of double antidumping duties. (202) 482–0198 or (202) 482–2201, 0.00 percent exists for MCC EuroChem3
We are issuing and publishing these respectively. for the period July 1, 2014, through June
results in accordance with sections 30, 2015.
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). 1 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3 for
Scope of the Order
Dated: August 5, 2016. more details on this rescission in part. As noted in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we will not
Ronald K. Lorentzen, The merchandise subject to the order issue assessment instructions as a result of the
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content rescission of the administrative review with respect
and Compliance. fertilizer which is produced by reacting to Phos Agro, given the ongoing new shipper
ammonia with carbon dioxide. The review. Id. n.13.
Appendix 2 See memorandum from Gary Taverman,
product is currently classified under the
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
List of Sections in the Preliminary Decision Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Memorandum United States (HTSUS) item number to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
Summary 3102.10.0010. Previously such for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Background merchandise was classified under item Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Scope of the Order Antidumping Duty Administrative and New
number 480.3000 and 3102.10.0000 of Shipper Review: Solid Urea from the Russian
Partial Rescission the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS Federation,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
Discussion of the Methodology subheading is provided for convenience (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is
Non-Market Economy Country Status hereby adopted by this notice.
Separate Rates
and customs purposes, the written 3 OJSC Nevinnomysskiy Azot, and OJSC NAK
Preliminary Determination of No description of the merchandise subject Azot (a.k.a., Novomoskovskiy Azot, OJSC) are
Shipments to the order is dispositive. producing subsidiaries of MCC EuroChem.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53568/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:33:34
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:33:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective August 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 3518. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 53412 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR