81 FR 53414 - Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 156 (August 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 53414-53416 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19261 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 156 (Friday, August 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 53414-53416] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19261] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-821-801] Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Reviews and Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on solid urea from the Russian Federation (Russia). The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. The Department preliminarily finds that MCC EuroChem and Joint Stock Company PhosAgro- Cherepovets (PhosAgro) have not made sales of subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective August 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Romani or Andre Gziryan, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0198 or (202) 482-2201, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content fertilizer which is produced by reacting ammonia with carbon dioxide. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS) item number 3102.10.0010. Previously such merchandise was classified under item number 480.3000 and 3102.10.0000 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. Rescission of Administrative Review in Part We are rescinding the administrative review in part with respect to PhosAgro.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3 for more details on this rescission in part. As noted in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we will not issue assessment instructions as a result of the rescission of the administrative review with respect to Phos Agro, given the ongoing new shipper review. Id. n.13. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department conducted these reviews in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772(a) and 772(b) of the Act respectively. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, located at room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative and New Shipper Review: Solid Urea from the Russian Federation,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review As a result of this administrative review, we preliminarily determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for MCC EuroChem\3\ for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ OJSC Nevinnomysskiy Azot, and OJSC NAK Azot (a.k.a., Novomoskovskiy Azot, OJSC) are producing subsidiaries of MCC EuroChem. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 53415]] Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review As a result of this new shipper review, we preliminarily determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for merchandise produced and exported by Joint Stock Company PhosAgro- Cherepovets for the period July 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit cases briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing the case briefs.\5\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b). \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\7\ Requests should contain (1) the party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act, the Department will issue the final results of these reviews, including the results of its analysis of issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after the publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Assessment Rates If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of these reviews, the Department will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and, where possible, the total entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\8\ If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin continues to be zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). \9\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by MCC EuroChem or PhosAgro for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate of 64.93 percent \10\ if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ The all-others rate established in Urea From the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 52 FR 19557 (May 26, 1987). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of these reviews. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of these reviews for all shipments of solid urea from Russia entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate with respect to the adminstrative review respondent, MCC EuroChem, will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in these reviews but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in these reviews, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the manufacturer of the merchandise for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 64.93 percent.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- With respect to PhosAgro, the new shipper respondent, the Department established a combination cash deposit rate for this company consistent with its practice as follows: (1) For subject merchandise produced and exported by PhosAgro, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for PhosAgro in the final results of the new shipper review; (2) for subject merchandise exported by PhosAgro, but not produced by PhosAgro, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the all-others established in the less-than-fair-value investigation; and (3) for subject merchandise produced by PhosAgro but not exported by PhosAgro, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing the preliminary results of these reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213, 351.214 and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: August 5, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Rescission of Administrative Review in Part Bona Fides Analysis Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis Date of Sale Product Comparisons Export Price and Constructed Export Price Normal Value A. Selection of Comparison Market B. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test C. Level of Trade D. Cost of Production Analysis E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices [[Page 53416]] Currency Conversion Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-19261 Filed 8-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![53414 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
warehouse, for consumption, in Allegation of Duty Evasion Rescission of Administrative Review in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i). Recommendation Part
[FR Doc. 2016–19250 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am]
Cash Deposit Requirements We are rescinding the administrative
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
The following cash deposit review in part with respect to
requirements will be effective upon PhosAgro.1
publication of the final results of this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
administrative review for all shipments Methodology
of the subject merchandise entered, or International Trade Administration The Department conducted these
withdrawn from warehouse, for reviews in accordance with section
consumption on or after the publication 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
[A–821–801]
date of the final results of review, as amended (the Act). Export and
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Solid Urea From the Russian constructed export price are calculated
Act: (1) For previously investigated or Federation: Preliminary Results of in accordance with section 772(a) and
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters Antidumping Duty Administrative and
which are not under review in this 772(b) of the Act respectively. Normal
New Shipper Reviews and Rescission value is calculated in accordance with
segment of the proceeding but which of Administrative Review, in Part;
have separate rates, the cash deposit rate section 773(c) of the Act.
2014–2015
will continue to be the exporter-specific For a full description of the
rate published for the most recent AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, methodology underlying our
period; (2) for all PRC exporters of International Trade Administration, conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
subject merchandise that have not been Department of Commerce. Memorandum.2 The Preliminary
granted a separate rate, including Hunan Decision Memorandum is a public
Valin, the cash deposit rate will be the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce document and is made available to the
PRC-wide rate of 128.59 percent; and (3) (the Department) is conducting an public via Enforcement and
for all non-PRC exporters of subject administrative review and new shipper Compliance’s Antidumping and
merchandise which have not received review of the antidumping duty order Countervailing Duty Centralized
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will on solid urea from the Russian Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
be the rate applicable to the PRC Federation (Russia). The period of ACCESS is available to registered users
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC review (POR) is July 1, 2014, through at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
exporter. These deposit requirements, June 30, 2015. The Department parties in the Central Records Unit,
when imposed, shall remain in effect preliminarily finds that MCC EuroChem located at room B8024 of the main
until further notice. and Joint Stock Company PhosAgro- Department of Commerce building. In
Cherepovets (PhosAgro) have not made
Notification to Importers addition, a complete version of the
sales of subject merchandise in the
This notice also serves as a Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
United States at prices below normal
preliminary reminder to importers of be found at http://
value. Interested parties are invited to
their responsibility under 19 CFR enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
comment on these preliminary results.
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate A list of the topics discussed in the
regarding the reimbursement of DATES: Effective August 12, 2016. Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
antidumping duties prior to liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
of the relevant entries during this Michael Romani or Andre Gziryan, AD/ Preliminary Results of the
review period. Failure to comply with CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement Administrative Review
this requirement could result in the and Compliance, International Trade
Department’s presumption that Administration, U.S. Department of As a result of this administrative
reimbursement of antidumping duties Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue review, we preliminarily determine that
occurred and the subsequent assessment NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: a weighted-average dumping margin of
of double antidumping duties. (202) 482–0198 or (202) 482–2201, 0.00 percent exists for MCC EuroChem3
We are issuing and publishing these respectively. for the period July 1, 2014, through June
results in accordance with sections 30, 2015.
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
CFR 351.213(d)(4) and 351.221(b)(4). 1 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3 for
Scope of the Order
Dated: August 5, 2016. more details on this rescission in part. As noted in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we will not
Ronald K. Lorentzen, The merchandise subject to the order issue assessment instructions as a result of the
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content rescission of the administrative review with respect
and Compliance. fertilizer which is produced by reacting to Phos Agro, given the ongoing new shipper
ammonia with carbon dioxide. The review. Id. n.13.
Appendix 2 See memorandum from Gary Taverman,
product is currently classified under the
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
List of Sections in the Preliminary Decision Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
Memorandum United States (HTSUS) item number to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
Summary 3102.10.0010. Previously such for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Background merchandise was classified under item Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Scope of the Order Antidumping Duty Administrative and New
number 480.3000 and 3102.10.0000 of Shipper Review: Solid Urea from the Russian
Partial Rescission the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS Federation,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
Discussion of the Methodology subheading is provided for convenience (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is
Non-Market Economy Country Status hereby adopted by this notice.
Separate Rates
and customs purposes, the written 3 OJSC Nevinnomysskiy Azot, and OJSC NAK
Preliminary Determination of No description of the merchandise subject Azot (a.k.a., Novomoskovskiy Azot, OJSC) are
Shipments to the order is dispositive. producing subsidiaries of MCC EuroChem.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53570/page/1.svg)
![53416 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2016 / Notices
Currency Conversion Memorandum is a public document and available and, because the Government
Recommendation is on file electronically via Enforcement of Brazil and the respondent companies
[FR Doc. 2016–19261 Filed 8–11–16; 8:45 am] and Compliance’s Antidumping and did not act to the best of their abilities
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Countervailing Duty Centralized in responding to the Department’s
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). requests for information, we drew an
ACCESS is available to registered users adverse inference where appropriate in
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE at http://access.trade.gov, and is selecting from among the facts
available to all parties in the Central otherwise available.5 Specifically, we
International Trade Administration Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main applied facts available, with adverse
[C–351–846] Department of Commerce building. In inferences, for the Reduction of Tax on
addition, a complete version of the Industrialized Products for Machines
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Issues and Decision Memorandum can and Equipment, the BNDES FINAME
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products be accessed directly at http:// Loan program, and the Ex-Tarifário
From Brazil: Final Affirmative enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed program, in accordance with section
Determination, and Final Determination Issues and Decision Memorandum and 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For further
of Critical Circumstances, in Part the electronic version are identical in information, see the section ‘‘Use of
content. Adverse Facts Available’’ in the
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Scope Comments accompanying Issues and Decision
International Trade Administration,
Memorandum.
Department of Commerce. In accordance with the Preliminary
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Scope Determination,3 the Department Changes Since the Preliminary
(the Department) determines that set aside a period of time for parties to Determination
countervailable subsidies are being address scope issues in case briefs or
provided to producers and exporters of other written comments on scope issues. Based on our analysis of the
certain hot-rolled steel flat products In the Preliminary Determination, we comments received from parties, and
(hot-rolled steel, or HRS) from Brazil. did not modify the scope language as it the minor corrections presented and
For information on the estimated appeared in the Initiation Notice.4 No additional items discovered at
subsidy rates, see the ‘‘Final interested party submitted scope verification, we made certain changes to
Determination’’ section of this notice. comments in case or rebuttal briefs; the respondents’ subsidy rate
The period of investigation is January 1, therefore, the scope of this investigation calculations. For a discussion of these
2014, through December 31, 2014. remains unchanged for this final changes, see the Issues and Decision
determination. Memorandum.
DATES: Effective August 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scope of the Investigation Final Affirmative Determination of
Sergio Balbontin, Nicholas Czajkowski, Critical Circumstances, in Part
The products covered by this
or Lana Nigro, AD/CVD Operations, investigation are certain hot-rolled steel
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, On October 23, 2015, the petitioner
flat products from Brazil. For a complete filed a timely critical circumstances
International Trade Administration, description of the scope of this
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 allegation pursuant to section 703(e)(1)
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(c)(1),
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Investigation,’’ attached to this notice at
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6478, alleging that critical circumstances exist
Appendix I. with respect to imports of hot-rolled
(202) 482–1395, and (202) 482–1779,
respectively. Analysis of Subsidy Programs and steel from Brazil.6 We preliminarily
Comments Received determined that critical circumstances
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: existed with respect to CSN and
The subsidy programs under
Background Usiminas, but not for all others
investigation and the issues raised in
companies.7 Based on additional import
The Department published the the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the data that became available since the
Preliminary Determination on January
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A Preliminary Determination of Critical
15, 2016.1 A summary of the events that
list of the issues that parties raised, and Circumstances, we are departing from
occurred since the Department
to which we have responded in the our preliminary finding. For this final
published the Preliminary
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is determination, in accordance with
Determination, as well as a full
attached to this notice at Appendix II. section 705(a) of the Act, we find that
discussion of the issues raised by parties
critical circumstances exist with respect
for this final determination, may be Use of Adverse Facts Available to CSN but that critical circumstances
found in the Issues and Decision
In making this final determination, do not exist with respect to Usiminas
Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision
the Department relied, in part, on facts and all other producers and exporters of
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Rolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil,’’ dated 5 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil:
Preliminary Affirmative Determination and concurrently with this determination (Issues and 1930, as amended (the Act).
Alignment of Final Determination With Final Decision Memorandum) and hereby adopted by this 6 See letter from the Petitioner, ‘‘Certain Hot-
Antidumping Duty Determination, 81 FR 2168 notice. Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia, Brazil,
(January 15, 2016) (Preliminary Determination) and 3 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Japan and the Netherlands—Critical Circumstances
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Allegations,’’ dated October 23, 2015.
(PDM). Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Certain Hot- 7 See Antidumping Duty Investigations of Certain
2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Rolled Steel Products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From Australia,
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, Turkey and Brazil, Japan, and the Netherlands and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. the United Kingdom: Scope Comments Decision Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot-
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,’’ Rolled Steel Flat Products From Brazil: Preliminary
Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision dated March 14, 2016. Determinations of Critical Circumstances, 80 FR
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the 4 See Preliminary Determination PDM at ‘‘Scope 76444 (December 9, 2015) (Preliminary
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hot- Comments.’’ Determination of Critical Circumstances).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:42 Aug 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM 12AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_53570/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:33:06
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:33:06
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective August 12, 2016. | |
| Contact | Michael Romani or Andre Gziryan, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0198 or (202) 482-2201, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 53414 |
2024 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR