81 FR 53922 - Safety Zone; Apra Outer Harbor, Naval Base Guam

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 157 (August 15, 2016)

Page Range		53922-53924
FR Document		2016-19372

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for navigable waters of Apra Harbor, Guam in the vicinity of San Luis Beach, Sumay Cove and Commadores Cut. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from vessel operations in the area. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Guam.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53922-53924]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19372]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0644]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Apra Outer Harbor, Naval Base Guam

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
navigable waters of Apra Harbor, Guam in the vicinity of San Luis 
Beach, Sumay Cove and Commadores Cut. The safety zone is needed to 
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from vessel 
operations in the area. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is 
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Guam.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from August 15, 
2016 through 7 p.m. August 31, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, 
actual notice will be used from 7 a.m. July 31, 2016 through August 15, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0644 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone 671-355-4866, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The 
final details for this operation were not known to the Coast Guard 
until there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish 
an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit 
the Coast Guard's ability to protect vessels and waterway users from 
the hazards associated with the operation.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons 
discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice 
period to run would be impracticable.

[[Page 53923]]

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Guam has determined that potential 
hazards associated with vessel operations starting July 31, 2016 will 
be a safety concern for anyone in the vicinity of the operations. This 
rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone during 
active vessel operations.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 7 a.m. on July 31, 2016 
through 7 p.m. on August 31, 2016. The safety zone will cover all 
navigable waters in the vicinity of vessel operations to include waters 
off of San Luis Beach out 900 yards then across to Commadores Cut, down 
to the Navy Restricted area and along the shore line back to San Luis 
Beach, restricting access to Sumay Cove to Navy and Coast Guard 
operational responses. The duration of the zone is intended to protect 
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable 
waters while the vessel operations are ongoing. No vessel or person 
will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission 
from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive order related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit 
around this safety zone which will impact a small designated area of 
Apra Outer Harbor in Naval Base Guam for four days of the 32 day window 
and vessel traffic in this area is normally low. Moreover, the Coast 
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 
16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to 
enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone lasting 32 days with an expected 
enforcement of only 4 days that will prohibit entry of vessels to all 
navigable waters in the vicinity of vessel operations to include waters 
off of San Luis Beach out 900 yards then across to Commadores Cut, down 
to the Navy

[[Page 53924]]

Restricted area and along the shore line back to San Luis Beach and 
restricting access to Sumay Cove to Navy and Coast Guard operational 
responses. It is categorically excluded from further review under 
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record-
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T14-0644 to read as follows:


Sec.  165. T14-0644  Safety Zone; Apra Outer Harbor, Naval Base Guam.

    (a) Location. The following areas comprise a safety zone within the 
Guam Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15): All 
navigable waters bounded by an imaginary line starting at 
13[deg]26'34'' N., 144[deg]38'44'' E. at San Luis Beach; thence 900 
yards to 13[deg]26'57'' N., 144[deg]38'44'' E.; thence to 
13[deg]26'57'' N., 144[deg]39'31'' E. across Commadores Cut; thence to 
13[deg]26'42'' N., 144[deg]39'45'' E. at the Navy Restricted area; 
thence to 13[deg]26'36'' N., 144[deg]39'45'' E. at Guam Shipyard; and 
then along the shore line back to San Luis Beach, restricting access to 
Sumay Cove to Navy and Coast Guard operational responses. All 
coordinates are NAD 83.
    (b) Effective dates and enforcement period. This rule is effective 
without actual notice from August 15, 2016 through 7 p.m. August 31, 
2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 
7 a.m. July 31, 2016 through August 15, 2016 and this rule is enforced 
from the time vessel operations begin until they are completed.
    (c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones 
contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply. No vessels may enter or transit 
safety zone unless authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative thereof.
    (d) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty 
officer, and any other COTP representative permitted by law, may 
enforce this temporary safety zone.
    (e) Waiver. The COTP may waive any of the requirements of this rule 
for any person, vessel or class of vessel upon finding that application 
of the safety zone is unnecessary or impractical for the purpose of 
maritime security.
    (f) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject 
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.

    Dated: July 14, 2016.
James B. Pruett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Guam.
[FR Doc. 2016-19372 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 53923

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule window and vessel traffic in this area is D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule normally low. Moreover, the Coast Governments
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to A rule has implications for federalism
Captain of the Port Guam has Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel under Executive Order 13132,
determined that potential hazards 16 about the zone and the rule allows Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
associated with vessel operations vessels to seek permission to enter the effect on the States, on the relationship
starting July 31, 2016 will be a safety zone. between the national government and
concern for anyone in the vicinity of the B. Impact on Small Entities the States, or on the distribution of
operations. This rule is needed to power and responsibilities among the
protect personnel, vessels, and the The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
marine environment in the navigable 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that order and
waters within the safety zone during requires Federal agencies to consider have determined that it is consistent
active vessel operations. the potential impact of regulations on with the fundamental federalism
small entities during rulemaking. The principles and preemption requirements
IV. Discussion of the Rule
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small described in Executive Order 13132.
This rule establishes a safety zone businesses, not-for-profit organizations Also, this rule does not have tribal
from 7 a.m. on July 31, 2016 through 7 that are independently owned and implications under Executive Order
p.m. on August 31, 2016. The safety operated and are not dominant in their 13175, Consultation and Coordination
zone will cover all navigable waters in fields, and governmental jurisdictions with Indian Tribal Governments,
the vicinity of vessel operations to with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial
include waters off of San Luis Beach out The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian
900 yards then across to Commadores 605(b) that this rule will not have a tribes, on the relationship between the
Cut, down to the Navy Restricted area significant economic impact on a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
and along the shore line back to San substantial number of small entities. or on the distribution of power and
Luis Beach, restricting access to Sumay
While some owners or operators of responsibilities between the Federal
Cove to Navy and Coast Guard
vessels intending to transit the safety Government and Indian tribes. If you
operational responses. The duration of
zone may be small entities, for the believe this rule has implications for
the zone is intended to protect
reasons stated in section V.A above, this federalism or Indian tribes, please
personnel, vessels, and the marine
rule will not have a significant contact the person listed in the FOR
environment in these navigable waters
economic impact on any vessel owner FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
while the vessel operations are ongoing.
or operator. above.
No vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
permission from the COTP or a Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
designated representative.
we want to assist small entities in of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
V. Regulatory Analyses understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of
We developed this rule after would affect your small business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
considering numerous statutes and organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
Executive order related to rulemaking. jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a
Below we summarize our analyses concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the
based on a number of these statutes and compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of
Executive orders, and we discuss First listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Amendment rights of protestors. CONTACT section.
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
A. Regulatory Planning and Review Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble.
direct agencies to assess the costs and who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under
necessary, to select regulatory Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security
approaches that maximize net benefits. and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
importance of quantifying both costs Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in
and benefits, of reducing costs, of annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National
harmonizing rules, and of promoting responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
flexibility. This rule has not been wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a
by the Office of Management and small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
Budget. about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a safety
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

This regulatory action determination of the Coast Guard. zone lasting 32 days with an expected
is based on the size, location, and C. Collection of Information enforcement of only 4 days that will
duration. Vessel traffic will be able to prohibit entry of vessels to all navigable
safely transit around this safety zone This rule will not call for a new waters in the vicinity of vessel
which will impact a small designated collection of information under the operations to include waters off of San
area of Apra Outer Harbor in Naval Base Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Luis Beach out 900 yards then across to
Guam for four days of the 32 day U.S.C. 3501–3520). Commadores Cut, down to the Navy

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM 15AUR1

53924 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

Restricted area and along the shore line actual notice from August 15, 2016 may be affected by emissions from
back to San Luis Beach and restricting through 7 p.m. August 31, 2016. For the sources in Iowa. EPA is taking final
access to Sumay Cove to Navy and Coast purposes of enforcement, actual notice action to approve Iowa’s determination
Guard operational responses. It is will be used from 7 a.m. July 31, 2016 that the existing Regional Haze (RH) SIP
categorically excluded from further through August 15, 2016 and this rule is adequate to meet the visibility goals
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure is enforced from the time vessel and requires no substantive revision at
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An operations begin until they are this time.
environmental analysis checklist completed. DATES: This final rule is effective
supporting this determination and a (c) Regulations. The general September 14, 2016.
Categorical Exclusion Determination are regulations governing safety zones ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
available in the docket where indicated contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply. No docket for this action under Docket ID
under ADDRESSES. We seek any vessels may enter or transit safety zone No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0365. All
comments or information that may lead unless authorized by the COTP or a documents in the docket are listed on
to the discovery of a significant designated representative thereof. the www.regulations.gov Web site.
environmental impact from this rule. (d) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard Although listed in the index, some
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, information is not publicly available,
G. Protest Activities
and any other COTP representative i.e., CBI or other information whose
The Coast Guard respects the First permitted by law, may enforce this disclosure is restricted by statute.
Amendment rights of protesters. temporary safety zone. Certain other material, such as
Protesters are asked to contact the (e) Waiver. The COTP may waive any copyrighted material, is not placed on
person listed in the FOR FURTHER of the requirements of this rule for any the Internet and will be publicly
INFORMATION CONTACT section to person, vessel or class of vessel upon available only in hard copy form.
coordinate protest activities so that your finding that application of the safety Publicly available docket materials are
message can be received without zone is unnecessary or impractical for available either electronically through
jeopardizing the safety or security of the purpose of maritime security. www.regulations.gov or at the
people, places or vessels. (f) Penalties. Vessels or persons Environmental Protection Agency, Air
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 violating this rule are subject to the Planning and Development Branch,
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 50 U.S.C. 192.
(water), Reporting and record-keeping Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s
requirements, Security measures, Dated: July 14, 2016. official hours of business are Monday
Waterways. James B. Pruett, through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the excluding Federal holidays. The
For the reasons discussed in the
Port, Guam. interested persons wanting to examine
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
[FR Doc. 2016–19372 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am] these documents should make an
CFR part 165 as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P appointment with the office at least 24
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION hours in advance.
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Stephen Krabbe, Environmental
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 AGENCY Protection Agency, Air Planning and
continues to read as follows: Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 40 CFR Part 52 Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; [EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0365; FRL–9949–82–
913–551–7991, or by email at
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Region 7] krabbe.stephen@epa.gov.
No. 0170.1.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
■ 2. Add § 165.T14–0644 to read as Approval of Iowa’s Air Quality Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
follows: Implementation Plans; Regional Haze or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
State Implementation Plan Revision provides additional information by
§ 165. T14–0644 Safety Zone; Apra Outer
Harbor, Naval Base Guam.
and 2013 Five-Year Progress Report addressing the following:
(a) Location. The following areas AGENCY: Environmental Protection I. Background
comprise a safety zone within the Guam Agency (EPA). II. Summary of SIP Revision
Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 III. Final Action
ACTION: Final rule.
CFR 3.70–15): All navigable waters IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
bounded by an imaginary line starting at SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
13°26′34″ N., 144°38′44″ E. at San Luis Agency (EPA) is taking final action to I. Background
Beach; thence 900 yards to 13°26′57″ N., approve the Iowa State Implementation On July 3, 2014, (79 FR 37976), EPA
144°38′44″ E.; thence to 13°26′57″ N., Plan (SIP) revision submitted to EPA by published a notice of proposed
144°39′31″ E. across Commadores Cut; the State of Iowa on July 19, 2013, rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Iowa.
thence to 13°26′42″ N., 144°39′45″ E. at documenting that the State’s existing In the NPR, EPA proposed approval of
the Navy Restricted area; thence to plan is making adequate progress to Iowa’s progress report SIP, a report on
13°26′36″ N., 144°39′45″ E. at Guam achieve visibility goals by 2018. The progress made in the first
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

Shipyard; and then along the shore line Iowa SIP revision addressed the implementation period towards RPGs
back to San Luis Beach, restricting Regional Haze Rule (RHR) requirements for Class I areas that are affected by
access to Sumay Cove to Navy and Coast under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) emissions from Iowa sources. This
Guard operational responses. All to submit a report describing progress in progress report SIP and accompanying
coordinates are NAD 83. achieving reasonable progress goals cover letter also included a
(b) Effective dates and enforcement (RPGs) to improve visibility in Federally determination that Iowa’s existing
period. This rule is effective without designated areas in nearby states that regional haze SIP requires no

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM 15AUR1

Document Created: 2016-08-13 02:22:13
Document Modified: 2016-08-13 02:22:13

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective without actual notice from August 15, 2016 through 7 p.m. August 31, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will be used from 7 a.m. July 31, 2016 through August 15, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 671-355-4866, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 53922
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Record-Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 53922 - Safety Zone; Apra Outer Harbor, Naval Base Guam

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 157 (August 15, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard