81 FR 53929 - Partial Stay; Arizona; Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 157 (August 15, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 157 (August 15, 2016)
| Page Range | 53929-53931 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19113 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 53929-53931] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19113] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846, FRL-9950-41-Region 9] Partial Stay; Arizona; Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Partial stay. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is granting an administrative stay of specific provisions of the Arizona Regional Haze Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) applicable to the Phoenix Cement Company (PCC) Clarkdale Plant and the CalPortland Company (CPC) Rillito Plant under the Clean Air Act (CAA). In response to requests from PCC and CPC, we are staying the effectiveness of control technology optimization requirements for nitrogen oxides (NOX ) applicable to Kiln 4 at the Clarkdale Plant and Kiln 4 at the Rillito Plant during the EPA's reconsideration of these requirements under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B) for a period of 90 days. Today's action reflects this stay in the Code of Federal Regulations. DATES: Effective August 15, 2016, 40 CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to 40 CFR 52.145 are stayed until November 14, 2016. The addition of 40 CFR 52.145(n) in this rule is also effective from August 15, 2016 until November 14, 2016. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colleen McKaughan, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Division, Air-1, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Colleen McKaughan can be reached at telephone number (520) 498-0118 and via electronic mail at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Background II. Administrative Stay III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background This section provides a brief overview of the background for today's action. Please refer to our proposed action on reconsideration for additional background.\1\ On September 3, 2014, the EPA promulgated a FIP addressing certain requirements of the CAA and the EPA's Regional Haze Rule for sources in Arizona.\2\ Among other things, the Arizona Regional Haze FIP includes NOX emission limits achievable with selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) applicable to Clarkdale Kiln 4 and Rillito Kiln 4. In particular, the EPA established two alternative emission limits for NOX on Clarkdale Kiln 4: A 2.12 lb/ton limit or an 810 tons/year limit. The lb/ton limit equates to the installation of a SNCR system, based on a 50 percent control efficiency, while the ton/year limit could be met either by installing SNCR or by maintaining recent production levels. We set an emission limit for NOX at Rillito Kiln 4 of 3.46 lb/ton, based on a 35 percent control efficiency. The FIP also includes monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and a compliance deadline for the final NOX emission limits of December 31, 2018. Finally, in response to comments alleging that SNCR control efficiencies of 50 percent for Clarkdale Kiln 4 and 35 percent for Rillito Kiln 4 were unsupported and that SNCR was capable of achieving higher control efficiencies, we established requirements for control technology demonstrations (``optimization requirements'') for the SNCR systems at both kilns, which would entail the collection of data that then could be used to determine if a higher control efficiency was achievable. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 81 FR 42600 (June 30, 2016). \2\ 79 FR 52420 (September 3, 2014)(Arizona Regional Haze ``Phase 3'' Rule). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PCC and CPC each submitted a petition to the EPA on November 3, 2014, seeking administrative reconsideration and a partial stay of the final FIP under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).\3\ In their petitions, both companies raised multiple objections to the optimization requirements in the FIP. CPC asserted that the requirements were burdensome, expensive, and unnecessary, given that CPC had already ``evaluated fuels, fuel fineness, and the other characteristics listed in the Optimization Protocol'' as part of its effort to reduce energy usage.\4\ PCC stated that the requirements ``would be burdensome to implement'' and ``would substantially interfere with the cement manufacturing operations'' at the Clarkdale Plant.\5\ PCC further asserted that requirements would harm the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC), which relies on revenue from the Clarkdale Plant.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014); Letter from Jay Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014). \4\ Letter from Jay Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014), attachment entitled ``Petition of CalPortland Company for Partial Reconsideration and Request for Administrative Stay of EPA Final Rule, Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport Federal Implementation Plan Published at 79 FR 52420'' at 4. \5\ Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014) at 2. \6\ We note that while the Clarkdale Plant is tribally owned, it is not located on tribal land. It is subject to State jurisdiction and is regulated by ADEQ. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The EPA sent letters to PCC and CPC on January 16, 2015 and January 27, 2015, respectively, granting reconsideration of the optimization requirements pursuant to CAA section [[Page 53930]] 307(d)(7)(B).\7\ However, the EPA did not act on the companies' request for a stay of those requirements. On June 30, 2016, the EPA issued its proposed action on reconsideration, proposing to replace the optimization requirements for both kilns with a series of revised recordkeeping and reporting requirements.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ Letter from Jared Blumenfeld, EPA, to Verle C. Martz, PCC (January 16, 2015); Letter from Jared Blumenfeld, EPA, to Jay Grady, CPC (January 27, 2015). \8\ 81 FR 42600. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Administrative Stay In light of the EPA's proposed rule to replace the optimization requirements applicable to Clarkdale Kiln 4 and Rillito Kiln 4 and the fact that these provisions require implementation of various operational adjustments and submittal of protocols and reports in advance of the December 31, 2018 compliance deadline for the NOX emission limits, the EPA is now granting PCC's and CPC's petitions for a stay of the effectiveness of those requirements under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). In particular, we are staying the effectiveness of 40 CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to 40 CFR 52.145 for a period of 90 days, which is the maximum length of a stay authorized under CAA section 307(d)(7)(B). The EPA anticipates that we will complete final action on reconsideration prior to the conclusion of this stay, but if we are unable to do so, we will consider granting a further stay of the optimization requirements under section 705 of the APA. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders. A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) because it applies to only two facilities and is therefore not a rule of general applicability. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to the APA but is subject to the CAA, which does not require notice and comment rulemaking to take this action. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or in the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action has tribal implications. However, it will neither impose substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. This action stays the effectiveness of optimization requirements that currently apply to the PCC Clarkdale Plant. The profits from the Clarkdale Plant are used to provide government services to SRPMIC's members. The EPA consulted with tribal officials under the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes early in the process of developing our proposed action on reconsideration of the optimization requirements to permit them to have meaningful and timely input into its development.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Summary of Consultation with SRPMIC Regarding Regional Haze FIP Reconsideration (Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0846-0026). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not change the level of environmental protection for any affected populations. K. Congressional Review Act This rule is exempt from the CRA because it is a rule of particular applicability. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen oxides, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Visibility. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: August 1, 2016. Gina McCarthy, Administrator. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart D--Arizona 0 2. Amend Sec. 52.145 by adding paragraph (n) to read as follows: Sec. 52.145 Visibility protection. * * * * * (n) The effectiveness of paragraph (k)(6) of this section and Appendix A to [[Page 53931]] this section is stayed from August 15, 2016 until November 14, 2016. [FR Doc. 2016-19113 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 53929
EPA-APPROVED NEW HAMPSHIRE REGULATIONS—Continued
State effective
State citation Title/subject EPA approval date 1 Explanations
date
* * * * * * *
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this col-
umn for the particular provision.
* * * * * available only in hard copy form. 35 percent for Rillito Kiln 4 were
[FR Doc. 2016–19123 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am] Publicly available docket materials are unsupported and that SNCR was
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P available electronically through http:// capable of achieving higher control
www.regulations.gov. efficiencies, we established
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: requirements for control technology
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Colleen McKaughan, U.S. EPA, Region demonstrations (‘‘optimization
AGENCY 9, Air Division, Air-1, 75 Hawthorne requirements’’) for the SNCR systems at
40 CFR Part 52 Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. both kilns, which would entail the
Colleen McKaughan can be reached at collection of data that then could be
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0846, FRL–9950–41– telephone number (520) 498–0118 and used to determine if a higher control
Region 9] via electronic mail at efficiency was achievable.
mckaughan.colleen@epa.gov. PCC and CPC each submitted a
Partial Stay; Arizona; Regional Haze
Federal Implementation Plan SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: petition to the EPA on November 3,
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 2014, seeking administrative
AGENCY: Environmental Protection and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. reconsideration and a partial stay of the
Agency (EPA). final FIP under CAA section
Table of Contents
ACTION: Partial stay. 307(d)(7)(B) and the Administrative
I. Background Procedure Act (APA).3 In their petitions,
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection II. Administrative Stay
Agency (EPA) is granting an both companies raised multiple
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews objections to the optimization
administrative stay of specific
provisions of the Arizona Regional Haze I. Background requirements in the FIP. CPC asserted
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) This section provides a brief overview that the requirements were burdensome,
applicable to the Phoenix Cement of the background for today’s action. expensive, and unnecessary, given that
Company (PCC) Clarkdale Plant and the Please refer to our proposed action on CPC had already ‘‘evaluated fuels, fuel
CalPortland Company (CPC) Rillito reconsideration for additional fineness, and the other characteristics
Plant under the Clean Air Act (CAA). In background.1 On September 3, 2014, the listed in the Optimization Protocol’’ as
response to requests from PCC and CPC, EPA promulgated a FIP addressing part of its effort to reduce energy usage.4
we are staying the effectiveness of certain requirements of the CAA and the PCC stated that the requirements
control technology optimization EPA’s Regional Haze Rule for sources in ‘‘would be burdensome to implement’’
requirements for nitrogen oxides (NOX) Arizona.2 Among other things, the and ‘‘would substantially interfere with
applicable to Kiln 4 at the Clarkdale Arizona Regional Haze FIP includes the cement manufacturing operations’’
Plant and Kiln 4 at the Rillito Plant NOX emission limits achievable with at the Clarkdale Plant.5 PCC further
during the EPA’s reconsideration of selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) asserted that requirements would harm
these requirements under CAA section applicable to Clarkdale Kiln 4 and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian
307(d)(7)(B) for a period of 90 days. Rillito Kiln 4. In particular, the EPA Community (SRPMIC), which relies on
Today’s action reflects this stay in the established two alternative emission revenue from the Clarkdale Plant.6
Code of Federal Regulations. limits for NOX on Clarkdale Kiln 4: A The EPA sent letters to PCC and CPC
DATES: Effective August 15, 2016, 40 2.12 lb/ton limit or an 810 tons/year on January 16, 2015 and January 27,
CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to 40 limit. The lb/ton limit equates to the 2015, respectively, granting
CFR 52.145 are stayed until November installation of a SNCR system, based on
reconsideration of the optimization
14, 2016. The addition of 40 CFR a 50 percent control efficiency, while
requirements pursuant to CAA section
52.145(n) in this rule is also effective the ton/year limit could be met either by
from August 15, 2016 until November installing SNCR or by maintaining 3 Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina
14, 2016. recent production levels. We set an McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014); Letter from Jay
emission limit for NOX at Rillito Kiln 4 Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy, EPA (November
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
of 3.46 lb/ton, based on a 35 percent 3, 2014).
docket for this action under Docket ID control efficiency. The FIP also includes 4 Letter from Jay Grady, CPC, to Regina McCarthy,
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0846. All monitoring, recordkeeping, and EPA (November 3, 2014), attachment entitled
documents in the docket are listed on reporting requirements and a ‘‘Petition of CalPortland Company for Partial
the http://www.regulations.gov Web Reconsideration and Request for Administrative
compliance deadline for the final NOX Stay of EPA Final Rule, Promulgation of Air Quality
site. Although listed in the index, some emission limits of December 31, 2018. Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
information is not publicly available, Finally, in response to comments Interstate Visibility Transport Federal
e.g., confidential business information alleging that SNCR control efficiencies Implementation Plan Published at 79 FR 52420’’ at
(CBI) or other information whose 4.
of 50 percent for Clarkdale Kiln 4 and 5 Letter from Verle C. Martz, PCC, to Regina
disclosure is restricted by statute.
McCarthy, EPA (November 3, 2014) at 2.
Certain other material, such as 1 81FR 42600 (June 30, 2016). 6 We note that while the Clarkdale Plant is tribally
copyrighted material, is not placed on 2 79FR 52420 (September 3, 2014)(Arizona owned, it is not located on tribal land. It is subject
the Internet and will be publicly Regional Haze ‘‘Phase 3’’ Rule). to State jurisdiction and is regulated by ADEQ.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM 15AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_54086/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 53931
this section is stayed from August 15, holidays. The telephone number for the and hearing requests are provided in 40
2016 until November 14, 2016. Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, CFR 178.25(b).
[FR Doc. 2016–19113 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am] and the telephone number for the OPP In addition to filing an objection or
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
the visitor instructions and additional as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
information about the docket available submit a copy of the filing (excluding
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. any Confidential Business Information
AGENCY FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Susan Lewis, Registration Division Information not marked confidential
40 CFR Part 180 (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0719; FRL–9949–49] notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
objection or hearing request, identified
n-Butyl 3-hydroxybutyrate and DC 20460–0001; main telephone
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
Isopropyl 3-hydroxybutyrate; number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
2015–0719, by one of the following
Exemption From the Requirement of a RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
methods:
Tolerance SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
AGENCY: Environmental Protection I. General Information www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
Agency (EPA). instructions for submitting comments.
A. Does this action apply to me? Do not submit electronically any
ACTION: Final rule.
You may be potentially affected by information you consider to be CBI or
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes this action if you are an agricultural other information whose disclosure is
exemptions from the requirement of a producer, food manufacturer, or restricted by statute.
tolerance for residues of n-butyl 3- • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
pesticide manufacturer. The following
hydroxybutyrate (CAS Reg. No. 53605– Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
list of North American Industrial
94–0) and isopropyl 3-hydroxybutyrate DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
(CAS Reg. No. 54074–94–1) when used NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather • Hand Delivery: To make special
as inert ingredients (solvents) in provides a guide to help readers
pesticide formulations applied to arrangements for hand delivery or
determine whether this document delivery of boxed information, please
growing crops or raw agricultural applies to them. Potentially affected
commodities after harvest; to animals; follow the instructions at http://
entities may include: www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
and to food contact surfaces in public • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
eating places, dairy-processing Additional instructions on commenting
• Animal production (NAICS code or visiting the docket, along with more
equipment, and food-processing 112).
equipment and utensils. Steptoe and information about dockets generally, is
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code available at http://www.epa.gov/
Johnson, on behalf of Eastman Chemical 311).
Company, submitted a petition to EPA dockets.
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
under the Federal Food, Drug, and II. Petition for Exemption
code 32532).
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting In the Federal Register of November
establishment of these exemptions from B. How can I get electronic access to 23, 2015 (80 FR 72941) (FRL–9936–73),
the requirement of a tolerance. This other related information? EPA issued a document pursuant to
regulation eliminates the need to You may access a frequently updated FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
establish a maximum permissible level electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 announcing the filing of a pesticide
for residues of n-butyl 3- through the Government Printing petition (PP IN–10841) by Steptoe and
hydroxybutyrate and isopropyl 3- Office’s e-CFR site at http:// Johnson LLP (1330 Connecticut Avenue
hydroxybutyrate when applied or used www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- NW., Washington, DC 20036–1795) on
under these conditions. idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/ behalf of the Eastman Chemical
DATES: This regulation is effective 40tab_02.tpl. Company (200 South Wilcox Drive,
August 15, 2016. Objections and Kingsport, TN 37660–5280). The
requests for hearings must be received C. How can I file an objection or hearing
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.910,
on or before October 14, 2016, and must request?
180.930, and 180.940 be amended to
be filed in accordance with the Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 establish exemptions from the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an requirement of a tolerance for residues
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the objection to any aspect of this regulation of n-butyl 3-hydroxybutyrate (CAS Reg.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). and may also request a hearing on those No. 53605–94–0); and isopropyl 3-
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, objections. You must file your objection hydroxybutyrate (CAS Reg. No. 54074–
identified by docket identification (ID) or request a hearing on this regulation 94–1) when used as inert ingredients
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0719, is in accordance with the instructions (solvents) in pesticide formulations
available at http://www.regulations.gov provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure applied to pre- and post-harvest crops
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs proper receipt by EPA, you must under 40 CFR 180.910; to animals under
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 40 CFR 180.930; and to food contact
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
in the Environmental Protection Agency OPP–2015–0719 in the subject line on surface sanitizing solutions under 40
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William the first page of your submission. All CFR 180.940(a). That document
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 objections and requests for a hearing referenced a summary of the petition
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC must be in writing, and must be prepared by Steptoe and Johnson on
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room received by the Hearing Clerk on or behalf of Eastman Chemical Company,
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., before October 14, 2016. Addresses for the petitioner, which is available in the
Monday through Friday, excluding legal mail and hand delivery of objections docket, http://www.regulations.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:35 Aug 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM 15AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_54086/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-13 02:22:47
Document Modified: 2016-08-13 02:22:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Partial stay. | |
| Dates | Effective August 15, 2016, 40 CFR 52.145(k)(6) and Appendix A to 40 CFR 52.145 are stayed until November 14, 2016. The addition of 40 CFR 52.145(n) in this rule is also effective from August 15, 2016 until November 14, 2016. | |
| Contact | Colleen McKaughan, U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Division, Air-1, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Colleen McKaughan can be reached at telephone number (520) 498-0118 and via electronic mail at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 53929 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Nitrogen Oxides; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Visibility |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR