81_FR_54288 81 FR 54131 - Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2; Use of Optimized ZIRLOTM

81 FR 54131 - Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2; Use of Optimized ZIRLOTM

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 157 (August 15, 2016)

Page Range54131-54133
FR Document2016-19363

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an exemption in response to a March 16, 2016, request from Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC or the licensee) in order to use Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material at the Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2, and the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 1 and 2.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54131-54133]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-348, 50-364, 50-424, and 50-425; NRC-2016-0169]


Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 
and 2, and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2; Use of 
Optimized ZIRLOTM Fuel Rod Cladding Material

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Exemption; issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an 
exemption in response to a March 16, 2016, request from Southern 
Nuclear Operating Company (SNC or the licensee) in order to use 
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material at the Farley Nuclear 
Plant (FNP), Units 1 and 2, and the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant 
(VEGP), Units 1 and 2.

DATES: The exemption was issued on August 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0169 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0169. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if that document 
is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is 
referenced.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Martin, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1493, email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Southern Nuclear Operating Company is the holder of Renewed 
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-2, NPF-8, NPF-68, and NPF-81, which 
authorize operation of FNP, Units 1 and 2, and VEGP, Units 1 and 2, 
respectively. The licenses provide, among other things, that each 
facility is subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the NRC 
now or hereafter in effect.
    The FNP and VEGP units are pressurized-water reactors located in 
Houston County, Alabama, and Burke County, Georgia, respectively.

II. Request/Action

    Pursuant to Sec.  50.12 title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(10 CFR), ``Specific exemptions,'' the licensee has requested by letter 
dated March 16, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16076A217), an exemption 
from 10 CFR 50.46, ``Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling 
systems [ECCS] for light-water nuclear power reactors,'' and 10 CFR 
part 50, appendix K, ``ECCS Evaluation Models,'' to allow the use of 
fuel rods clad with Optimized ZIRLO\TM\. The regulations in 10 CFR 
50.46(a) require that the calculated cooling performance following 
postulated loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs) at reactors fueled with 
zircaloy or ZIRLO[supreg] cladding conforms to the criteria set forth 
in 10 CFR 50.46(b). In addition, 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, requires, 
in part, that the Baker-Just equation be used to predict the rates of 
energy release, hydrogen generation, and cladding oxidation from the 
metal/water reaction. The Baker-Just equation assumes the use of 
zircaloy materials that have different chemical compositions from 
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\. As written, these regulations presume only the use 
of zircaloy or ZIRLO[supreg] fuel rod cladding and do not contain 
provisions for use of fuel rods with other cladding materials. 
Therefore, an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 
CFR part 50, appendix K, is needed to

[[Page 54132]]

support the use of a different fuel rod cladding material. Accordingly, 
the licensee requested an exemption to allow the use of Optimized 
ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding at FNP and VEGP.

III. Discussion

    Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by 
any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from 
the requirements of 10 CFR part 50, when the exemptions are authorized 
by law, will not present an undue risk to public health or safety, and 
are consistent with the common defense and security. However, 10 CFR 
50.12(a)(2) states that the Commission will not consider granting an 
exemption unless special circumstances are present as set forth in 10 
CFR 50.12(a)(2). Under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), special circumstances 
are present when application of the regulation in the particular 
circumstances would not serve, or is not necessary to achieve, the 
underlying purpose of the rule.

A. Special Circumstances

    Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), 
are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular 
circumstances is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the 
rule. The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, 
appendix K, is to establish acceptance criteria for ECCS performance to 
provide reassurance of safety in the event of a LOCA. Although the 
wording of the regulations in 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, appendix 
K, is not expressly applicable to Optimized ZIRLOTM, the 
evaluations described in the following sections of this exemption show 
that the purpose of the regulations is met by this exemption in that 
subject to certain conditions, the acceptance criteria are valid for 
Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel cladding material, Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ would 
maintain better post-quench ductility, and the Baker-Just equation 
conservatively bounds LOCA scenario metal-water reaction rates and is 
applicable to Optimized ZIRLO\TM\. Because the underlying purposes of 
10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, can be achieved through 
the application of these requirements to the use of Optimized 
ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material, the special 
circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) for the granting of an 
exemption exist.

B. Authorized by Law

    This exemption would allow the use of fuel rods clad with Optimized 
ZIRLO\TM\ in future core reload applications for FNP and VEGP. The 
regulations in 10 CFR 50.12 allow the NRC to grant exemptions from the 
requirements of 10 CFR part 50 provided that the exemptions are 
authorized by law. The NRC staff determined that special circumstances 
exist to grant the proposed exemption and that granting the exemption 
would not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended. Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.

C. No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety

    The provisions of 10 CFR 50.46 establish acceptance criteria for 
ECCS performance. Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC (Westinghouse), 
Topical Report ``WCAP-12610-P-A & CENPD-404-P-A, Addendum 1-A, 
``Optimized ZIRLO\TM\,'' '' dated July 2006, contain the justification 
to use Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material, in 
addition to Zircaloy-4 and ZIRLO[supreg]. The complete topical report 
is not publicly available because it contains proprietary information; 
however, a redacted version and the NRC safety evaluation are available 
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML062080569. The NRC staff found that the 
Westinghouse topical report demonstrates the applicability of the ECCS 
acceptance criteria to Optimized ZIRLO\TM\, subject to the compliance 
with the specific conditions of approval established therein. The NRC 
staff reviewed the March 16, 2016, application against these specific 
conditions and concluded that the licensee is in compliance with all of 
the applicable conditions. The NRC staff's review of these specific 
conditions for FNP and VEGP can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. 
ML16179A386.
    Ring compression tests performed by Westinghouse on Optimized 
ZIRLOTM were reviewed and approved by the NRC staff in 
Topical Report WCAP-14342-A & CENPD-404-NP-A, Addendum 1-A, and 
demonstrate an acceptable retention of post-quench ductility up to the 
10 CFR 50.46 limits of 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit and 17 percent 
equivalent clad reacted. Furthermore, the NRC staff has concluded that 
oxidation measurements provided by Westinghouse illustrate that oxide 
thickness (and associated hydrogen pickup) for Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ at 
any given burnup would be less than that for both zircaloy and 
ZIRLO[supreg] (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML073130555). Hence, the NRC 
staff concludes that Optimized ZIRLOTM would be expected to 
maintain acceptable post-quench ductility.
    The provisions of 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, 
``Metal-Water Reaction Rate,'' serve to ensure that cladding oxidation 
and hydrogen generation are limited appropriately during a LOCA and are 
conservatively accounted for in the ECCS evaluation model. That 
regulation requires that the Baker-Just equation be used in the ECCS 
evaluation model to determine the rate of energy release, cladding 
oxidation, and hydrogen generation. Since the use of the Baker-Just 
equation presumes the use of zircaloy-clad fuel, strict application of 
the rule would not permit use of the equation for Optimized 
ZIRLOTM cladding for determining acceptable fuel 
performance. As concluded in the NRC staff's safety evaluation for the 
associated topical report, Westinghouse demonstrated that the Baker-
Just model is conservative in all post-LOCA scenarios with respect to 
the use of the Optimized ZIRLOTM as a fuel cladding 
material.
    The NRC-approved topical report has demonstrated that predicted 
chemical, thermal, and mechanical characteristics of the Optimized 
ZIRLOTM alloy cladding are bounded by those approved for 
ZIRLO[supreg] under anticipated operational occurrences and postulated 
accidents. Reload cores are required to be operated in accordance with 
the operating limits specified in the technical specifications (TSs) 
and the core operating limits report.
    Based on the above, no new accident precursors are created by using 
Optimized ZIRLOTM; therefore, the probability of postulated 
accidents is not increased. Also, based on the above, the consequences 
of postulated accidents are not increased. Therefore, there is no undue 
risk to public health and safety due to using Optimized ZIRLO\TM\.

D. Consistent With Common Defense and Security

    The proposed exemption would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ 
fuel rod cladding material at FNP and VEGP. This change to the plant 
configuration is adequately controlled by TS requirements and is not 
related to security issues. Because the common defense and security is 
not impacted by this exemption, the exemption is consistent with the 
common defense and security.

E. Environmental Considerations

    The NRC staff determined that the exemption discussed herein meets 
the eligibility criteria for the categorical exclusion set forth in 10 
CFR 51.22(c)(9) because it is related to a requirement concerning the 
installation or use of a

[[Page 54133]]

facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 
CFR part 20, and issuance of this exemption involves: (i) No 
significant hazards consideration, (ii) no significant change in the 
types or a significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that 
may be released offsite, and (iii) no significant increase in 
individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Therefore, in 
accordance with 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or 
environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the NRC's 
consideration of this exemption request. The basis for the NRC staff's 
determination is discussed as follows, with an evaluation against each 
of the requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i)-(iii).
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i)
    The NRC staff evaluated whether the exemption involves no 
significant hazards consideration using the standards described in 10 
CFR 50.92(c), as presented below:

    1. Does the proposed exemption involve a significant increase in 
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change would allow the use of Optimized 
ZIRLOTM clad nuclear fuel in the reactors. The NRC 
approved Topical Report WCAP-12610-P-A & CENPD-404-P-A, Addendum 1-
A, ``Optimized ZIRLOTM,'' prepared by Westinghouse, 
addresses Optimized ZIRLOTM and demonstrates that 
Optimized ZIRLOTM has essentially the same properties as 
currently licensed ZIRLO[supreg]. The fuel cladding itself is not an 
accident initiator and does not affect accident probability. Use of 
Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel cladding has been shown to meet 
all 10 CFR 50.46 acceptance criteria and, therefore, will not 
increase the consequences of an accident.
    Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant 
increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated.
    2. Does the proposed exemption create the possibility of a new 
or different kind of accident from any accident previously 
evaluated?
    Response: No.
    Use of Optimized ZIRLOTM clad fuel will not result in 
changes in the operation or configuration of the facility. Topical 
Report WCAP-12610-P-A & CENPD-404-P-A demonstrate that the material 
properties of Optimized ZIRLOTM are similar to those of 
ZIRLO[supreg]. Therefore, Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod 
cladding will perform similarly to those fabricated from 
ZIRLO[supreg], and, therefore, precludes the possibility of the fuel 
becoming an accident initiator and causing a new or different type 
of accident.
    Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility 
of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously 
evaluated.
    3. Does the proposed exemption involve a significant reduction 
in a margin of safety?
    Response: No.
    The proposed change will not involve a significant reduction in 
the margin of safety because it has been demonstrated that the 
material properties of Optimized ZIRLOTM are not 
significantly different from those of ZIRLO[supreg]. Optimized 
ZIRLOTM is expected to perform similarly to ZIRLO[supreg] 
for all normal operating and accident scenarios, including both LOCA 
and non-LOCA scenarios. For LOCA scenarios, plant-specific 
evaluations have been performed, which allow the use of fuel 
assemblies with fuel rods containing Optimized ZIRLOTM. 
These LOCA evaluations address the NRC safety evaluation report 
conditions and limitations for Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod 
cladding and provide continued compliance with the acceptance 
criteria of 10 CFR 50.46.

    Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant 
reduction in a margin of safety.
    Based on the above, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed 
exemption involves no significant hazards consideration. Accordingly, 
the requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(ii)
    The proposed exemption would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ 
fuel rod cladding material in the reactors. Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ has 
essentially the same material properties and performance 
characteristics as the currently licensed ZIRLO[supreg] cladding. 
Therefore, the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material 
will not significantly change the types of effluents that may be 
released offsite or significantly increase the amount of effluents that 
may be released offsite. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(9)(ii) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(iii)
    The proposed exemption would allow the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ 
fuel rod cladding material in the reactors. Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ has 
essentially the same material properties and performance 
characteristics as the currently licensed ZIRLO[supreg] cladding. 
Therefore, the use of Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod cladding material 
will not significantly increase individual occupational radiation 
exposure or significantly increase cumulative occupational radiation 
exposure. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(iii) are 
met.
Conclusion
    Based on the above, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed 
exemption meets the eligibility criteria for the categorical exclusion 
set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 
51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment 
need be prepared in connection with the NRC's proposed issuance of this 
exemption.

IV. Conclusions

    Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue 
risk to the public health and safety, is consistent with the common 
defense and security, and that special circumstances are present to 
warrant issuance of the exemption. Therefore, the Commission hereby 
grants SNC an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 
CFR part 50, appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, to allow the application of 
these criteria to, and the use of, Optimized ZIRLO\TM\ fuel rod 
cladding material at FNP and VEGP.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of August 2016.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anne T. Boland,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016-19363 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P



                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices                                             54131

                                                subsequently licensed for distribution by the           violations. The NRC also concluded that the           document referenced (if that document
                                                Licensee.                                               Licensee provided an adequate basis for               is available in ADAMS) is provided the
                                                                                                        mitigation of the proposed civil penalty              first time that a document is referenced.
                                                NRC Evaluation of Licensee’s Response to
                                                                                                        amount. Consequently, a reduced civil                    • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
                                                Violations
                                                                                                        penalty in the amount of $21,000 will be
                                                   The NRC considers these violations                   imposed.
                                                                                                                                                              purchase copies of public documents at
                                                significant because the requirements in                 [FR Doc. 2016–19359 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]           the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
                                                § 30.3(a) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal            BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
                                                                                                                                                              White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
                                                Regulations (CFR) provide reasonable                                                                          Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
                                                assurance that transfers and the products                                                                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                intended for use by unlicensed persons meet                                                                   Robert Martin, Office of Nuclear Reactor
                                                                                                        NUCLEAR REGULATORY
                                                the applicable requirements. The failure to
                                                obtain appropriate license authorization to             COMMISSION                                            Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                distribute these products is significant                                                                      Commission, Washington DC 20555–
                                                                                                        [Docket Nos. 50–348, 50–364, 50–424, and
                                                because it resulted in the NRC not being able           50–425; NRC–2016–0169]                                0001; telephone: 301–415–1493, email:
                                                to conduct its regulatory responsibilities to                                                                 Robert.Martin@nrc.gov.
                                                ensure that the products were safe for                  Southern Nuclear Operating Company;                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                distribution to members of the general                  Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,
                                                public. The fact that there was no actual                                                                     I. Background
                                                                                                        and Vogtle Electric Generating Plant,
                                                contamination found, and that the NRC was
                                                                                                        Units 1 and 2; Use of Optimized                          Southern Nuclear Operating Company
                                                subsequently able to approve the Licensee’s
                                                application for possession and distribution             ZIRLOTM Fuel Rod Cladding Material                    is the holder of Renewed Facility
                                                licenses, is fortuitous, but does not decrease                                                                Operating License Nos. NPF–2, NPF–8,
                                                                                                        AGENCY:  Nuclear Regulatory                           NPF–68, and NPF–81, which authorize
                                                the importance of the regulatory requirement
                                                                                                        Commission.                                           operation of FNP, Units 1 and 2, and
                                                and NRC oversight. Also, the NRC considers
                                                the Licensee’s actions regarding all three of           ACTION: Exemption; issuance.                          VEGP, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The
                                                the violations to be willful and because the                                                                  licenses provide, among other things,
                                                NRC’s regulatory programs rely upon the                 SUMMARY:   The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                                                                                                                              that each facility is subject to all rules,
                                                integrity of entities, applicants, and licensees        Commission (NRC) is issuing an
                                                                                                                                                              regulations, and orders of the NRC now
                                                to comply with NRC requirements, the                    exemption in response to a March 16,
                                                                                                                                                              or hereafter in effect.
                                                willful violations are of significant concern to        2016, request from Southern Nuclear
                                                the NRC. Therefore, in accordance with the
                                                                                                                                                                 The FNP and VEGP units are
                                                                                                        Operating Company (SNC or the
                                                Enforcement Policy (ADAMS Accession No.                                                                       pressurized-water reactors located in
                                                                                                        licensee) in order to use Optimized
                                                ML16197A561), these violations are                                                                            Houston County, Alabama, and Burke
                                                                                                        ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material at
                                                appropriately characterized as Severity Level                                                                 County, Georgia, respectively.
                                                                                                        the Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP), Units 1
                                                III violations. Accordingly, the significance of
                                                these violations have been determined to                and 2, and the Vogtle Electric                        II. Request/Action
                                                remain valid as stated in the Notice.                   Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 1 and 2.                  Pursuant to § 50.12 title 10 of the
                                                   2. Summary of Licensee’s Request for                 DATES: The exemption was issued on                    Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
                                                Mitigation of Civil Penalty Amount                      August 4, 2016.                                       ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ the licensee has
                                                   The Licensee stated that Plus, LLC, should                                                                 requested by letter dated March 16,
                                                                                                        ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
                                                be considered a small entity and that if
                                                considered a small entity then the amount of            NRC–2016–0169 when contacting the                     2016 (ADAMS Accession No.
                                                annual license fees that Plus, LLC, avoided             NRC about the availability of                         ML16076A217), an exemption from 10
                                                over the duration of the violations is less             information regarding this document.                  CFR 50.46, ‘‘Acceptance criteria for
                                                than the $70,000 estimated by the NRC. The              You may obtain publicly-available                     emergency core cooling systems [ECCS]
                                                Licensee requested that the NRC reconsider              information related to this document                  for light-water nuclear power reactors,’’
                                                the civil penalty amount proposed.                      using any of the following methods:                   and 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, ‘‘ECCS
                                                NRC Evaluation of Licensee’s Request for                   • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to               Evaluation Models,’’ to allow the use of
                                                Mitigation of Civil Penalty Amount                      http://www.regulations.gov and search                 fuel rods clad with Optimized ZIRLOTM.
                                                  The NRC confirmed that, on or about                   for Docket ID NRC–2016–0169. Address                  The regulations in 10 CFR 50.46(a)
                                                March 22, 2016, Plus, LLC, requested small              questions about NRC dockets to Carol                  require that the calculated cooling
                                                entity classification by submitting an NRC              Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;                   performance following postulated loss-
                                                Form 526—Certification of Small Entity                  email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For                   of-coolant accidents (LOCAs) at reactors
                                                Status for the Purposes of Annual Fees                  technical questions, contact the                      fueled with zircaloy or ZIRLO® cladding
                                                Imposed under 10 CFR part 171, along with               individual listed in the FOR FURTHER                  conforms to the criteria set forth in 10
                                                the Licensee’s first annual fee invoice. The            INFORMATION CONTACT section of this                   CFR 50.46(b). In addition, 10 CFR part
                                                request was accepted by the NRC and                     document.                                             50, appendix K, requires, in part, that
                                                therefore, Plus, LLC, is considered to be a                • NRC’s Agencywide Documents                       the Baker-Just equation be used to
                                                small entity entitled to reduced fees under 10
                                                CFR 171.16. Accordingly, the NRC
                                                                                                        Access and Management System                          predict the rates of energy release,
                                                recalculated the annual fees avoided                    (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-                     hydrogen generation, and cladding
                                                assuming small entity status and determined             available documents online in the                     oxidation from the metal/water reaction.
                                                that the amount of annual license fees that             ADAMS Public Documents collection at                  The Baker-Just equation assumes the use
                                                Plus, LLC, avoided was approximately                    http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/                        of zircaloy materials that have different
                                                $11,200. Therefore, the NRC has concluded               adams.html. To begin the search, select               chemical compositions from Optimized
                                                that it will not escalate the base civil penalty,       ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then                   ZIRLOTM. As written, these regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                and will reduce the proposed civil penalty to           select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS                        presume only the use of zircaloy or
                                                $21,000 as determined by application of the             Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,                    ZIRLO® fuel rod cladding and do not
                                                NRC Enforcement policy.
                                                  Conclusion:
                                                                                                        please contact the NRC’s Public                       contain provisions for use of fuel rods
                                                  Based on its evaluation, the NRC has                  Document Room (PDR) reference staff at                with other cladding materials.
                                                concluded that these violations occurred as             1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by                   Therefore, an exemption from the
                                                stated, and that adequate basis does not exist          email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The                    requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10
                                                for mitigation of the severity level of these           ADAMS accession number for each                       CFR part 50, appendix K, is needed to


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:23 Aug 12, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00091   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM   15AUN1


                                                54132                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices

                                                support the use of a different fuel rod                 applications for FNP and VEGP. The                       The provisions of 10 CFR part 50,
                                                cladding material. Accordingly, the                     regulations in 10 CFR 50.12 allow the                 appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, ‘‘Metal-
                                                licensee requested an exemption to                      NRC to grant exemptions from the                      Water Reaction Rate,’’ serve to ensure
                                                allow the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM                      requirements of 10 CFR part 50                        that cladding oxidation and hydrogen
                                                fuel rod cladding at FNP and VEGP.                      provided that the exemptions are                      generation are limited appropriately
                                                                                                        authorized by law. The NRC staff                      during a LOCA and are conservatively
                                                III. Discussion
                                                                                                        determined that special circumstances                 accounted for in the ECCS evaluation
                                                   Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the                        exist to grant the proposed exemption                 model. That regulation requires that the
                                                Commission may, upon application by                     and that granting the exemption would                 Baker-Just equation be used in the ECCS
                                                any interested person or upon its own                   not result in a violation of the Atomic               evaluation model to determine the rate
                                                initiative, grant exemptions from the                   Energy Act of 1954, as amended.                       of energy release, cladding oxidation,
                                                requirements of 10 CFR part 50, when                    Therefore, the exemption is authorized                and hydrogen generation. Since the use
                                                the exemptions are authorized by law,                   by law.                                               of the Baker-Just equation presumes the
                                                will not present an undue risk to public                                                                      use of zircaloy-clad fuel, strict
                                                health or safety, and are consistent with               C. No Undue Risk to Public Health and
                                                                                                                                                              application of the rule would not permit
                                                the common defense and security.                        Safety
                                                                                                                                                              use of the equation for Optimized
                                                However, 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2) states that                    The provisions of 10 CFR 50.46                     ZIRLOTM cladding for determining
                                                the Commission will not consider                        establish acceptance criteria for ECCS                acceptable fuel performance. As
                                                granting an exemption unless special                    performance. Westinghouse Electric                    concluded in the NRC staff’s safety
                                                circumstances are present as set forth in               Company, LLC (Westinghouse), Topical                  evaluation for the associated topical
                                                10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). Under 10 CFR                        Report ‘‘WCAP–12610–P–A & CENPD–                      report, Westinghouse demonstrated that
                                                50.12(a)(2)(ii), special circumstances are              404–P–A, Addendum 1–A, ‘‘Optimized                    the Baker-Just model is conservative in
                                                present when application of the                         ZIRLOTM,’’ ’’ dated July 2006, contain                all post-LOCA scenarios with respect to
                                                regulation in the particular                            the justification to use Optimized                    the use of the Optimized ZIRLOTM as a
                                                circumstances would not serve, or is not                ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material, in                fuel cladding material.
                                                necessary to achieve, the underlying                    addition to Zircaloy-4 and ZIRLO®. The                   The NRC-approved topical report has
                                                purpose of the rule.                                    complete topical report is not publicly               demonstrated that predicted chemical,
                                                                                                        available because it contains proprietary             thermal, and mechanical characteristics
                                                A. Special Circumstances
                                                                                                        information; however, a redacted                      of the Optimized ZIRLOTM alloy
                                                   Special circumstances, in accordance                 version and the NRC safety evaluation                 cladding are bounded by those
                                                with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), are present                are available in ADAMS under                          approved for ZIRLO® under anticipated
                                                whenever application of the regulation                  Accession No. ML062080569. The NRC                    operational occurrences and postulated
                                                in the particular circumstances is not                  staff found that the Westinghouse                     accidents. Reload cores are required to
                                                necessary to achieve the underlying                     topical report demonstrates the                       be operated in accordance with the
                                                purpose of the rule. The underlying                     applicability of the ECCS acceptance                  operating limits specified in the
                                                purpose of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR                      criteria to Optimized ZIRLOTM, subject                technical specifications (TSs) and the
                                                part 50, appendix K, is to establish                    to the compliance with the specific                   core operating limits report.
                                                acceptance criteria for ECCS                            conditions of approval established                       Based on the above, no new accident
                                                performance to provide reassurance of                   therein. The NRC staff reviewed the                   precursors are created by using
                                                safety in the event of a LOCA. Although                 March 16, 2016, application against                   Optimized ZIRLOTM; therefore, the
                                                the wording of the regulations in 10 CFR                these specific conditions and concluded               probability of postulated accidents is
                                                50.46 and 10 CFR part 50, appendix K,                   that the licensee is in compliance with               not increased. Also, based on the above,
                                                is not expressly applicable to Optimized                all of the applicable conditions. The                 the consequences of postulated
                                                ZIRLOTM, the evaluations described in                   NRC staff’s review of these specific                  accidents are not increased. Therefore,
                                                the following sections of this exemption                conditions for FNP and VEGP can be                    there is no undue risk to public health
                                                show that the purpose of the regulations                found in ADAMS under Accession No.                    and safety due to using Optimized
                                                is met by this exemption in that subject                ML16179A386.                                          ZIRLOTM.
                                                to certain conditions, the acceptance                      Ring compression tests performed by
                                                criteria are valid for Optimized                        Westinghouse on Optimized ZIRLOTM                     D. Consistent With Common Defense
                                                ZIRLOTM fuel cladding material,                         were reviewed and approved by the                     and Security
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM would maintain                        NRC staff in Topical Report WCAP–                       The proposed exemption would allow
                                                better post-quench ductility, and the                   14342–A & CENPD–404–NP–A,                             the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
                                                Baker-Just equation conservatively                      Addendum 1–A, and demonstrate an                      cladding material at FNP and VEGP.
                                                bounds LOCA scenario metal-water                        acceptable retention of post-quench                   This change to the plant configuration is
                                                reaction rates and is applicable to                     ductility up to the 10 CFR 50.46 limits               adequately controlled by TS
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM. Because the                          of 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit and 17                    requirements and is not related to
                                                underlying purposes of 10 CFR 50.46                     percent equivalent clad reacted.                      security issues. Because the common
                                                and 10 CFR part 50, appendix K, can be                  Furthermore, the NRC staff has                        defense and security is not impacted by
                                                achieved through the application of                     concluded that oxidation measurements                 this exemption, the exemption is
                                                these requirements to the use of                        provided by Westinghouse illustrate                   consistent with the common defense
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding                     that oxide thickness (and associated                  and security.
                                                                                                        hydrogen pickup) for Optimized
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                material, the special circumstances
                                                                                                        ZIRLOTM at any given burnup would be                  E. Environmental Considerations
                                                required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) for the
                                                granting of an exemption exist.                         less than that for both zircaloy and                     The NRC staff determined that the
                                                                                                        ZIRLO® (ADAMS Package Accession                       exemption discussed herein meets the
                                                B. Authorized by Law                                    No. ML073130555). Hence, the NRC                      eligibility criteria for the categorical
                                                  This exemption would allow the use                    staff concludes that Optimized ZIRLOTM                exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)
                                                of fuel rods clad with Optimized                        would be expected to maintain                         because it is related to a requirement
                                                ZIRLOTM in future core reload                           acceptable post-quench ductility.                     concerning the installation or use of a


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:23 Aug 12, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00092   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM   15AUN1


                                                                             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 157 / Monday, August 15, 2016 / Notices                                                  54133

                                                facility component located within the                     3. Does the proposed exemption involve a            with 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
                                                restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR                   significant reduction in a margin of safety?          impact statement or environmental
                                                part 20, and issuance of this exemption                   Response: No.                                       assessment need be prepared in
                                                                                                          The proposed change will not involve a
                                                involves: (i) No significant hazards                    significant reduction in the margin of safety
                                                                                                                                                              connection with the NRC’s proposed
                                                consideration, (ii) no significant change               because it has been demonstrated that the             issuance of this exemption.
                                                in the types or a significant increase in               material properties of Optimized ZIRLOTM              IV. Conclusions
                                                the amounts of any effluents that may be                are not significantly different from those of
                                                released offsite, and (iii) no significant              ZIRLO®. Optimized ZIRLOTM is expected to                 Accordingly, the Commission has
                                                increase in individual or cumulative                    perform similarly to ZIRLO® for all normal            determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
                                                occupational radiation exposure.                        operating and accident scenarios, including           50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
                                                                                                        both LOCA and non-LOCA scenarios. For                 law, will not present an undue risk to
                                                Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR
                                                                                                        LOCA scenarios, plant-specific evaluations            the public health and safety, is
                                                51.22(b), no environmental impact                       have been performed, which allow the use of
                                                statement or environmental assessment                   fuel assemblies with fuel rods containing
                                                                                                                                                              consistent with the common defense
                                                need be prepared in connection with the                 Optimized ZIRLOTM. These LOCA                         and security, and that special
                                                NRC’s consideration of this exemption                   evaluations address the NRC safety                    circumstances are present to warrant
                                                request. The basis for the NRC staff’s                  evaluation report conditions and limitations          issuance of the exemption. Therefore,
                                                determination is discussed as follows,                  for Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding               the Commission hereby grants SNC an
                                                with an evaluation against each of the                  and provide continued compliance with the             exemption from the requirements of 10
                                                                                                        acceptance criteria of 10 CFR 50.46.                  CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR part 50,
                                                requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i)–
                                                (iii).                                                    Therefore, the proposed change does                 appendix K, paragraph I.A.5, to allow
                                                                                                        not involve a significant reduction in a              the application of these criteria to, and
                                                Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i)                   margin of safety.                                     the use of, Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
                                                                                                          Based on the above, the NRC staff                   cladding material at FNP and VEGP.
                                                  The NRC staff evaluated whether the
                                                                                                        concludes that the proposed exemption                   Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day
                                                exemption involves no significant
                                                                                                        involves no significant hazards                       of August 2016.
                                                hazards consideration using the
                                                                                                        consideration. Accordingly, the                         For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
                                                standards described in 10 CFR 50.92(c),
                                                                                                        requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(i) are             Anne T. Boland,
                                                as presented below:
                                                                                                        met.                                                  Director, Division of Operating Reactor
                                                  1. Does the proposed exemption involve a
                                                significant increase in the probability or              Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(ii)                Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
                                                consequences of an accident previously                                                                        Regulation.
                                                                                                           The proposed exemption would allow
                                                evaluated?                                                                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–19363 Filed 8–12–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                        the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod
                                                  Response: No.                                                                                               BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
                                                                                                        cladding material in the reactors.
                                                  The proposed change would allow the use
                                                of Optimized ZIRLOTM clad nuclear fuel in
                                                                                                        Optimized ZIRLOTM has essentially the
                                                the reactors. The NRC approved Topical                  same material properties and                          NUCLEAR REGULATORY
                                                Report WCAP–12610–P–A & CENPD–404–P–                    performance characteristics as the                    COMMISSION
                                                A, Addendum 1–A, ‘‘Optimized ZIRLOTM,’’                 currently licensed ZIRLO® cladding.
                                                prepared by Westinghouse, addresses                     Therefore, the use of Optimized                       Request for a License To Export High-
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM and demonstrates that                 ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material will               Enriched Uranium
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM has essentially the same              not significantly change the types of
                                                properties as currently licensed ZIRLO®. The            effluents that may be released offsite or                Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of
                                                fuel cladding itself is not an accident initiator       significantly increase the amount of                  Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 110.70 (b)
                                                and does not affect accident probability. Use                                                                 ‘‘Public Notice of Receipt of an
                                                of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel cladding has
                                                                                                        effluents that may be released offsite.
                                                                                                        Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR                 Application,’’ please take notice that the
                                                been shown to meet all 10 CFR 50.46                                                                           U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                                acceptance criteria and, therefore, will not            51.22(c)(9)(ii) are met.
                                                increase the consequences of an accident.
                                                                                                                                                              (NRC) has received the following
                                                                                                        Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9)(iii)               request for an export license. Copies of
                                                  Therefore, the proposed change does not
                                                involve a significant increase in the                     The proposed exemption would allow                  the request are available electronically
                                                probability or consequences of an accident              the use of Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel rod                 through the Agencywide Documents
                                                previously evaluated.                                   cladding material in the reactors.                    Access and Management System and
                                                  2. Does the proposed exemption create the             Optimized ZIRLOTM has essentially the                 can be accessed through the Public
                                                possibility of a new or different kind of               same material properties and                          Electronic Reading Room link http://
                                                accident from any accident previously                   performance characteristics as the                    www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html at the
                                                evaluated?
                                                  Response: No.
                                                                                                        currently licensed ZIRLO® cladding.                   NRC Homepage.
                                                                                                        Therefore, the use of Optimized                          A request for a hearing or petition for
                                                  Use of Optimized ZIRLOTM clad fuel will
                                                not result in changes in the operation or               ZIRLOTM fuel rod cladding material will               leave to intervene may be filed within
                                                configuration of the facility. Topical Report           not significantly increase individual                 thirty days after publication of this
                                                WCAP–12610–P–A & CENPD–404–P–A                          occupational radiation exposure or                    notice in the Federal Register (FR). Any
                                                demonstrate that the material properties of             significantly increase cumulative                     request for hearing or petition for leave
                                                Optimized ZIRLOTM are similar to those of               occupational radiation exposure.                      to intervene shall be served by the
                                                ZIRLO®. Therefore, Optimized ZIRLOTM fuel               Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR                 requestor or petitioner upon the
                                                rod cladding will perform similarly to those                                                                  applicant, the office of the General
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                        51.22(c)(9)(iii) are met.
                                                fabricated from ZIRLO®, and, therefore,                                                                       Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                precludes the possibility of the fuel becoming          Conclusion                                            Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
                                                an accident initiator and causing a new or
                                                different type of accident.                               Based on the above, the NRC staff                   the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
                                                  Therefore, the proposed change does not               concludes that the proposed exemption                 Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
                                                create the possibility of a new or different            meets the eligibility criteria for the                and the Executive Secretary, U.S.
                                                kind of accident from any accident                      categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR             Department of State, Washington, DC
                                                previously evaluated.                                   51.22(c)(9). Therefore, in accordance                 20520.


                                           VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:23 Aug 12, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00093   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM   15AUN1



Document Created: 2016-08-13 02:21:55
Document Modified: 2016-08-13 02:21:55
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionExemption; issuance.
DatesThe exemption was issued on August 4, 2016.
ContactRobert Martin, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1493, email: [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 54131 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR