81 FR 55183 - Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 160 (August 18, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 160 (August 18, 2016)
| Page Range | 55183-55184 | |
| FR Document | 2016-19655 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 160 (Thursday, August 18, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 55183-55184] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-19655] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service. ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) has submitted a public information collection request (ICR) entitled AmeriCorps NCCC's (National Civilian Community Corps) Member Experience Survey for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling the Corporation for National and Community Service, Terry Grant, at 202 606 6899 or email to [email protected]. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTY-TDD) may call 1- 800-833-3722 between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. DATES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the information collection activity, within September 19, 2016. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the information collection activity, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation for National and Community Service, by any of the following two methods within 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register: (1) By fax to: 202-395-6974, Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation for National and Community Service; or (2) By email to: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of CNCS, including whether the information will have practical utility; Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; Propose ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and Propose ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including [[Page 55184]] through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments A 60-day Notice requesting public comment was published in the Federal Register on March 30, 2016, at Vol. 81, No. 61 FR 17686-17687. This comment period ended May 31, 2016. No public comments were received from this Notice. Description: This is a new information collection request. This survey was developed to support NCCC performance measurement for use in program development, funding, and evaluation. The survey instrument will be completed by NCCC Members following the completion of their service term. In particular, this survey will be administered to NCCC Members who are exiting early or have already exited early from the AmeriCorps NCCC program. Completion of this information collection is not required for the completion of a service term with NCCC. Type of Review: New. Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service. Title: NCCC Member Experience Survey. OMB Number: TBD. Agency Number: None. Affected Public: The NCCC Member Experience Survey will be administered to former NCCC Members. Total Respondents: Approximately 450. Frequency: Each respondent will complete only one survey for their most recent service term. Average Time per Response: 25 minutes. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 187.5 hours. Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): None. Total Burden Cost (operating/maintenance): None. Dated: August 11, 2016. Charles Davenport, Acting Director, National Civilian Community Corps. [FR Doc. 2016-19655 Filed 8-17-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6050-28-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2016 / Notices 55183
Society’s World IPv6 Day to test the typically involved in a decision to CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
IPv6 functionality of Web sites and implement IPv6? What are those COMMUNITY SERVICE
services. individuals’ primary motivations when
Moving forward, NTIA intends to it comes to implementing IPv6? Information Collection; Submission for
engage more directly in promoting IPv6 OMB Review, Comment Request
Return on Investment
deployment and use, with a particular AGENCY: Corporation for National and
focus on implementation. To assist in 1. What is the anticipated return on Community Service.
this purpose, NTIA is asking those who an IPv6-related investment? How ACTION: Notice.
have implemented IPv6 to share their quickly is a return on investment
experiences and to highlight in expected? SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
particular the factors and circumstances 2. Is return on investment a reason to and Community Service (CNCS) has
that supported their decision to move implement IPv6, or is implementation submitted a public information
ahead and adopt the protocol. NTIA considered a cost of doing business? collection request (ICR) entitled
hopes to utilize input received through AmeriCorps NCCC’s (National Civilian
this request for comments to guide and Implementation Community Corps) Member Experience
inform future promotion efforts, Survey for review and approval in
1. How long does the planning
including the IPv6 Best Practice Forum accordance with the Paperwork
process for IPv6 implementation take?
being organized for the 2016 Internet Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
Governance Forum, which will be held 2. How long does actual
13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of
in December 2016, in Guadalajara, implementation of IPv6 typically take?
this ICR, with applicable supporting
Mexico.4 Is implementation a single event or
documentation, may be obtained by
evolutionary?
Request for Comment calling the Corporation for National and
Cost of Implementation Community Service, Terry Grant, at 202
NTIA invites comment on the 606 6899 or email to tgrant@cns.gov.
following questions, in whole or in part: 1. What are the different types of costs Individuals who use a
involved in implementing IPv6? What telecommunications device for the deaf
Benefits are the typical magnitudes of each type (TTY–TDD) may call 1–800–833–3722
1. What are the benefits of of cost? between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern
implementing IPv6? For example, what 2. How does an organization cover Time, Monday through Friday.
are the direct performance benefits of those costs? DATES: Comments may be submitted,
implementing IPv6 for end users, or for 3. How does an organization justify identified by the title of the information
enhanced network security, as those costs? collection activity, within September
compared to IPv4?
4. What considerations are there for 19, 2016.
2. What are the expected or
unexpected benefits of implementing cost-saving? ADDRESSES: Comments may be
IPv6? 5. What implication does the size of submitted, identified by the title of the
an organization implementing IPv6 have information collection activity, to the
Obstacles on cost? Office of Information and Regulatory
1. What are the biggest obstacles Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Promotional Efforts Desk Officer for the Corporation for
related to IPv6 implementation? For
example, is it difficult to access 1. What promotional efforts, if any, National and Community Service, by
adequate vendor support for IPv6 should NTIA take? What would have any of the following two methods
hardware and/or software? Does the most impact? within 30 days from the date of
successful implementation depend publication in the Federal Register:
2. What promotional efforts, if any, (1) By fax to: 202–395–6974,
directly on another service provider? are being led by the private sector? Have
2. How does an organization Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
they been effective? Officer for the Corporation for National
overcome those obstacles?
3. Which additional stakeholders and Community Service; or
Incentives should NTIA target? What is the most (2) By email to: smar@omb.eop.gov.
1. What factors contribute to an effective forum? SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
organization’s decision to implement 4. Should NTIA partner with any is particularly interested in comments
IPv6? particular stakeholder group? which:
2. What additional incentives would Additional Issues: NTIA invites • Evaluate whether the proposed
be helpful in a decision to implement commenters to provide any additional collection of information is necessary
IPv6? information on other issues not for the proper performance of the
3. If one factor made the crucial identified in this RFC that could functions of CNCS, including whether
difference in deciding to implement contribute to NTIA’s understanding of the information will have practical
IPv6, as opposed to not implementing the considerations that organizations utility;
IPv6, what is that factor? take into account when deciding to • Evaluate the accuracy of the
proceed with IPv6 implementation, as agency’s estimate of the burden of the
Motivation proposed collection of information,
well as future IPv6 promotional efforts
1. What is typically the driving that NTIA may undertake. including the validity of the
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
motivation behind an organization’s methodology and assumptions used;
Dated: August 15, 2016. • Propose ways to enhance the
decision to implement IPv6?
Angela M. Simpson, quality, utility, and clarity of the
2. What are the job titles and/or roles
Deputy Assistant Secretary for information to be collected; and
of the people within an organization
Communications and Information. • Propose ways to minimize the
4 Internet Governance Forum 2016, available at: [FR Doc. 2016–19722 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am] burden of the collection of information
http://www.igf2016.mx/. BILLING CODE 3510–60–P on those who are to respond, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 Aug 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_55343/page/1.svg)
![55184 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 160 / Thursday, August 18, 2016 / Notices
through the use of appropriate DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE management project within the basin.
automated, electronic, mechanical, or The study objective is to define a
other technological collection Department of the Army, Corps of feasible and implementable project to
techniques or other forms of information Engineers reduce flood risk which is relatively
technology. high within the basin. In June 2011,
Intent To Prepare a Draft heavy rains in the upstream portions of
Comments Environmental Impact Statement for the watershed exceeded the storage
the Proposed Flood Risk Management capacity of upstream reservoirs already
A 60-day Notice requesting public Project for the Souris River Basin, full from the April snowmelt. Flows in
comment was published in the Federal North Dakota excess of 26,900 cubic feet per second
Register on March 30, 2016, at Vol. 81, (cfs) overwhelmed the existing Federal
No. 61 FR 17686–17687. This comment AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD. flood risk management projects
period ended May 31, 2016. No public (designed to pass 5,000 cfs from
comments were received from this ACTION: Notice of intent.
Burlington to Minot) and emergency
Notice. SUMMARY: The St. Paul District, Army flood fighting efforts, causing over $690
Description: This is a new information Corps of Engineers, in partnership with million in damages to more than 4,700
collection request. This survey was the Souris River Joint Water Resources structures.
developed to support NCCC Board (SRJB), is conducting a flood risk Following the 2011 flood, a non-
performance measurement for use in management feasibility study for the Federal local flood risk management
program development, funding, and Souris River Basin within the study was initiated by the North Dakota
continental United States. The State Water Commission in response to
evaluation. The survey instrument will
feasibility study will include an a request for assistance from the SRJB.
be completed by NCCC Members The scope of the non-Federal study,
following the completion of their Environmental Impact Statement and
consider opportunities to reduce flood identified as the Mouse River Enhanced
service term. In particular, this survey Flood Protection Plan (MREFPP), differs
will be administered to NCCC Members risk within Bonnineau, McHenry, Ward,
and Renville counties, North Dakota. from the Federal study and is primarily
who are exiting early or have already focused on flood protection specifically
The study will evaluate several
exited early from the AmeriCorps NCCC for the city of Minot. Because of its
alternative measures, including, but not
program. Completion of this information influence on an existing federal flood
limited to: Levees and floodwalls,
collection is not required for the project, this non-federal effort has
diversion channels, non-structural flood
completion of a service term with proofing, relocation of flood-prone requested permission from the Corps of
NCCC. structures, and flood storage. Engineers to pursue actions under 33
Type of Review: New. U.S.C. 408 (frequently referred to as
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Section 408). A separate Notice of Intent
Agency: Corporation for National and Questions about the proposed action was published (FR Doc. 2015–17670
Community Service. and Environmental Impact Statement Filed 7–16–15) for an EIS associated
may be directed to: U.S. Army Corps of with the Corps of Engineers’ decision on
Title: NCCC Member Experience
Engineers, St. Paul District, ATTN: Mr. the Section 408 request. However, this
Survey.
Terry J. Birkenstock, Deputy Chief, Notice of Intent involves an EIS with
OMB Number: TBD. Regional Planning & Environment broader consideration of flood risk
Agency Number: None. Division North, 180 Fifth Street East, across the basin. Additional details on
Suite 700, St. Paul, MN 55101–1678; the local, non-federal flood MREFPP can
Affected Public: The NCCC Member
telephone: (651) 290–5264; email be found at mouseriverplan.com.
Experience Survey will be administered
terry.birkenstock@usace.army.mil. This Souris River Basin Flood Risk
to former NCCC Members.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Management Feasibility Study and its
Total Respondents: Approximately Souris River (alternatively known as the associated NEPA documentation will be
450. Mouse River) is approximately 435 prepared by the Corps. The Corps will
Frequency: Each respondent will miles long. The river begins in the act as the lead agency and coordinate
complete only one survey for their most southeastern portion of the Canadian with other agencies to discuss their
recent service term. province of Saskatchewan, flows south participation in the NEPA process. The
and east through Renville, Ward, study will broadly evaluate several
Average Time per Response: 25
McHenry, and Bottineau counties, North alternative measures including, but not
minutes. Dakota, and then turns north before limited to: levees and floodwalls along
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 187.5 returning to Canada in southwest the river through towns, diversion
hours. Manitoba. The river flows through the channels, non-structural flood-proofing,
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): cities of Burlington, Minot, Sawyer, and relocation of flood-prone structures, and
None. Velva, North Dakota. Key features flood storage.
associated with the river include the Significant resources and issues to be
Total Burden Cost (operating/ Lake Darling Dam, the Upper Souris addressed in the draft Environmental
maintenance): None. National Wildlife Refuge, and the J. Impact Statement will be determined
Dated: August 11, 2016. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. through coordination with Federal
Charles Davenport, The Des Lacs River is a major tributary agencies, State agencies, local
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Acting Director, National Civilian Community that joins the Souris River at Burlington, governments, the general public,
Corps. North Dakota. interested private organizations, and
The purpose of this study is to collect industry. Anyone who has an interest in
[FR Doc. 2016–19655 Filed 8–17–16; 8:45 am]
and evaluate pertinent engineering, participating in the development of the
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
economic, social, and environmental Draft Environmental Impact Statement
information in order to assess the is invited to contact the St. Paul District,
potential for a federal flood risk Corps of Engineers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:05 Aug 17, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_55343/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-17 23:46:29
Document Modified: 2016-08-17 23:46:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Comments may be submitted, identified by the title of the information collection activity, within September 19, 2016. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 55183 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR