81 FR 55374 - Safety Zone; Port Huron Float-Down, St. Clair River, Port Huron, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 161 (August 19, 2016)

Page Range		55374-55376
FR Document		2016-19846
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the St. Clair River in the vicinity of Port Huron, Michigan. Though this is an unsanctioned, non-permitted marine event, this action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Port Huron, MI, during a float down event on August 21, 2016. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or a designated representative.
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 161 (Friday, August 19, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 161 (Friday, August 19, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55374-55376]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0751]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Port Huron Float-Down, St. Clair River, Port Huron, 
MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
certain waters of the St. Clair River in the vicinity of Port Huron, 
Michigan. Though this is an unsanctioned, non-permitted marine event, 
this action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these 
navigable waters near Port Huron, MI, during a float down event on 
August 21, 2016. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from 
being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
Detroit or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 12 p.m. through 8 p.m. on August 21, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0751 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary final rule, call or email Lieutenant Selena Warnke, 
Prevention Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568-
9508, email [email protected]. If you have questions on viewing 
the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

DHS Department of Homeland Security
COTP Captain of the Port
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The 
final details of this event were not known to the Coast Guard until 
there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish an 
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit 
the Coast Guard's ability to protect participants, mariners, and 
vessels from the hazards associated with this event. Furthermore, under 
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for 
making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register for the same reasons noted above.
    During the afternoon of August 21, 2016, a non-sanctioned public 
event, advertised over various social-media sites, in which a large 
number of persons float down a segment of the St. Clair River, using 
inner tubes and other similar floatation devices is scheduled to take 
place. The 2016 Float-Down event will occur between approximately 12 
p.m. and 8 p.m. on August 21, 2016. This event has taken place in the 
month of August yearly from 2009 through 2015.
    While no private or municipal entity has requested a marine event 
permit from the Coast Guard for this event, and although it has not 
received state or federal permits over these past years, the event has 
drawn over 3,000

[[Page 55375]]

participants of various ages annually. Despite plans put together by 
federal, state and local officials, emergency responders and law 
enforcement officials have been overburdened pursuing safety during 
this event. Medical emergencies, people drifting across the 
international border, and people trespassing on residential property 
when trying to get out of the water before the designated finish line 
are some of the numerous difficulties encountered during the Float-Down 
event.
    During the 2014 Float-Down event, a 19-year-old participating in 
the event died. Despite this, promotional information for the event 
continues to be published, and more than 3,000 people are again 
anticipated to float down the river this year. However, since no public 
or private organization holds themselves responsible as the event 
sponsor, the Coast Guard does not receive full and final details 
regarding the event or the number of participants until the time of the 
event.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231, 33 CFR 1.05-1 and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1. The Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) has 
determined that the 2016 Float-Down poses significant risks to public 
safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers of 
participants, strong river currents, limited rescue resources, and 
difficult emergency response scenarios could easily result in serious 
injuries or fatalities to Float-Down participants and spectators.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 12 p.m. through 8 p.m. on 
August 21, 2016. The safety zone will begin at Lighthouse Beach and 
encompass all U.S. waters of the St. Clair River bound by a line 
starting at a point on land north of Coast Guard Station Port Huron at 
position 43[deg]00'25'' N.; 082[deg]25'20'' W., extending east to the 
international boundary to a point at position 43[deg]00'25'' N.; 
082[deg]25'02'' W., following south along the international boundary to 
a point at position 42[deg]54'30'' N.; 082[deg]27'41'' W., extending 
west to a point on land just north of Stag Island at position 
42[deg]54'30'' N.; 082[deg]27'58'' W., and following north along the 
U.S. shoreline to the point of origin (NAD 83).
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated 
representative. Vessel operators must contact the COTP or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to transit through this safety 
zone. Additionally, no one under the age of 18 will be permitted to 
enter the safety zone if they are not wearing a Coast Guard-approved 
Personal Floatation Device (PFD). The COTP or his on-scene 
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes or executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and 
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential 
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or 
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and 
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced for relatively short duration, and it is 
designed to minimize the impact on navigation. Moreover, under certain 
conditions, vessels may still transit through the safety zone when 
permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    As per the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, as amended, we have considered the potential impact of regulations 
on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might 
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to 
transit or anchor in this portion of southern Lake Huron and the St. 
Clair River near Port Huron, MI on August 21, 2016, between the hours 
of 12 p.m. and 8 p.m.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the 
enforcement of the zone, Coast Guard Sector Detroit will issue a local 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan 
accordingly.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them. If this rule would affect your small business, 
organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions 
concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the 
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against entities 
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of 
the Coast Guard.

D. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined 
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

F. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to

[[Page 55376]]

coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received 
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or 
vessels.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

H. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

I. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

J. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

K. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

L. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive 
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect 
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

M. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

N. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and is therefore 
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0751 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0751  Safety Zone; Port Huron Float-Down, St. Clair 
River, Port Huron, MI.

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All 
U.S. navigable waters of southern Lake Huron and the St. Clair River 
adjacent to Port Huron, MI, beginning at Lighthouse Beach and 
encompassing all U.S. waters of the St. Clair River bound by a line 
starting at a point on land north of Coast Guard Station Port Huron at 
position 43[deg]00'25'' N.; 082[deg]25'20'' W., extending east to the 
international boundary to a point at position 43[deg]00'25'' N.; 
082[deg]25'02'' W., following south along the international boundary to 
a point at position 42[deg]54'30'' N.; 082[deg]27'41'' W., extending 
west to a point on land just north of Stag Island at position 
42[deg]54'30'' N.; 082[deg]27'58'' W., and following north along the 
U.S. shoreline to the point of origin (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. The safety zone described in paragraph (a) 
of this section will be enforced from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on August 
21, 2016.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety 
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit 
(COTP) or his on-scene representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted on a case-by-case basis by the COTP or his on-scene 
representative.
    (3) Additionally, no one under the age of 18 will be permitted to 
enter the safety zone if they are not wearing a Coast Guard-approved 
Personal Floatation Device (PFD).
    (4) The ``on-scene representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant or petty officer or a Federal, State, or local 
law enforcement officer designated by or assisting the COTP to act on 
his behalf.
    (5) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the COTP or his on-scene representative to request 
permission to do so. The COTP or a designated representative may be 
contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at 313-568-9464. Vessel operators given 
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all 
directions given to them by the COTP or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: August 16, 2016.
Scott B. Lemasters,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2016-19846 Filed 8-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 55375

participants of various ages annually. operators must contact the COTP or his This safety zone will not have a
Despite plans put together by federal, on-scene representative to obtain significant economic impact on a
state and local officials, emergency permission to transit through this safety substantial number of small entities for
responders and law enforcement zone. Additionally, no one under the the reasons cited in the Regulatory
officials have been overburdened age of 18 will be permitted to enter the Planning and Review section.
pursuing safety during this event. safety zone if they are not wearing a Additionally, before the enforcement of
Medical emergencies, people drifting Coast Guard-approved Personal the zone, Coast Guard Sector Detroit
across the international border, and Floatation Device (PFD). The COTP or will issue a local Broadcast Notice to
people trespassing on residential his on-scene representative may be Mariners so vessel owners and operators
property when trying to get out of the contacted via VHF Channel 16. can plan accordingly.
water before the designated finish line
are some of the numerous difficulties V. Regulatory Analyses C. Assistance for Small Entities
encountered during the Float-Down We developed this rule after Under section 213(a) of the Small
event. considering numerous statutes and Business Regulatory Enforcement
During the 2014 Float-Down event, a executive orders related to rulemaking. Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
19-year-old participating in the event Below we summarize our analyses we want to assist small entities in
died. Despite this, promotional based on these statutes or executive understanding this rule so that they can
information for the event continues to orders. better evaluate its effects on them. If this
be published, and more than 3,000 rule would affect your small business,
people are again anticipated to float A. Regulatory Planning and Review organization, or governmental
down the river this year. However, since This rule is not a significant jurisdiction and you have questions
no public or private organization holds regulatory action under section 3(f) of concerning its provisions or options for
themselves responsible as the event Executive Order 12866, Regulatory compliance, please contact the person
sponsor, the Coast Guard does not Planning and Review, as supplemented listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
receive full and final details regarding by Executive Order 13563, Improving CONTACT section above.
the event or the number of participants Regulation and Regulatory Review, and Small businesses may send comments
until the time of the event. does not require an assessment of on the actions of Federal employees
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule potential costs and benefits under who enforce, or otherwise determine
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 compliance with, Federal regulations to
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule the Small Business and Agriculture
or under section 1 of Executive Order
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231, 33 Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
13563. The Office of Management and
CFR 1.05–1 and 160.5; and Department and the Regional Small Business
Budget has not reviewed it under those
of Homeland Security Delegation No. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Orders.
0170.1. The Captain of the Port Detroit Ombudsman evaluates these actions
(COTP) has determined that the 2016 We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we annually and rates each agency’s
Float-Down poses significant risks to responsiveness to small business. If you
public safety and property. The likely anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not wish to comment on actions by
combination of large numbers of employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
participants, strong river currents, interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
limited rescue resources, and difficult Coast Guard will not retaliate against
emergency response scenarios could or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety entities that question or complain about
easily result in serious injuries or this rule or any policy or action of the
fatalities to Float-Down participants and zone created by this rule will be
relatively small and enforced for Coast Guard.
spectators.
relatively short duration, and it is D. Collection of Information
IV. Discussion of the Rule designed to minimize the impact on
This rule will not call for a new
This rule establishes a safety zone navigation. Moreover, under certain
collection of information under the
from 12 p.m. through 8 p.m. on August conditions, vessels may still transit
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
21, 2016. The safety zone will begin at through the safety zone when permitted
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Lighthouse Beach and encompass all by the Captain of the Port.
U.S. waters of the St. Clair River bound E. Federalism
B. Impact on Small Entities
by a line starting at a point on land A rule has implications for federalism
north of Coast Guard Station Port Huron As per the Regulatory Flexibility Act under Executive Order 13132,
at position 43°00′25″ N.; 082°25′20″ W., of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
extending east to the international amended, we have considered the effect on the States, on the relationship
boundary to a point at position potential impact of regulations on small between the national government and
43°00′25″ N.; 082°25′02″ W., following entities during rulemaking. The Coast the States, or on the distribution of
south along the international boundary Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) power and responsibilities among the
to a point at position 42°54′30″ N.; that this rule will not have a significant various levels of government. We have
082°27′41″ W., extending west to a point economic impact on a substantial analyzed this rule under that Order and
on land just north of Stag Island at number of small entities. determined that this rule does not have
position 42°54′30″ N.; 082°27′58″ W., This rule will affect the following implications for federalism.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

and following north along the U.S. entities, some of which might be small
shoreline to the point of origin (NAD entities: The owners or operators of F. Protest Activities
83). vessels intending to transit or anchor in The Coast Guard respects the First
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring this portion of southern Lake Huron and Amendment rights of protesters.
within the safety zone is prohibited the St. Clair River near Port Huron, MI Protesters are asked to contact the
unless authorized by the COTP or a on August 21, 2016, between the hours person listed in the FOR FURTHER
designated representative. Vessel of 12 p.m. and 8 p.m. INFORMATION CONTACT section to

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:10 Aug 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM 19AUR1
55376 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 161 / Friday, August 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

coordinate protest activities so that your N. Environment and following north along the U.S.
message can be received without We have analyzed this rule under shoreline to the point of origin (NAD
jeopardizing the safety or security of Department of Homeland Security 83).
people, places, or vessels. Management Directive 023–01 and (b) Enforcement period. The safety
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, zone described in paragraph (a) of this
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
which guide the Coast Guard in section will be enforced from 12:00 p.m.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act to 8:00 p.m. on August 21, 2016.
complying with the National
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
Federal agencies to assess the effects of the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
their discretionary regulatory actions. In into, transiting or anchoring within this
have concluded this action is one of a
particular, the Act addresses actions safety zone is prohibited unless
category of actions which do not
that may result in the expenditure by a authorized by the Captain of the Port
individually or cumulatively have a
State, local, or tribal government, in the Detroit (COTP) or his on-scene
significant effect on the human
aggregate, or by the private sector of representative.
environment. This rule involves the
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (2) The safety zone is closed to all
establishment of a safety zone and is
more in any one year. Though this rule vessel traffic, except as may be
therefore categorically excluded from
will not result in such expenditure, we permitted on a case-by-case basis by the
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
do discuss the effects of this rule COTP or his on-scene representative.
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
elsewhere in this preamble. (3) Additionally, no one under the age
Instruction. An environmental analysis
H. Taking of Private Property checklist supporting this determination of 18 will be permitted to enter the
and a Categorical Exclusion safety zone if they are not wearing a
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have Determination are available in the Coast Guard-approved Personal
taking implications under Executive docket where indicated under Floatation Device (PFD).
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or (4) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
Interference with Constitutionally information that may lead to the the COTP is any Coast Guard
Protected Property Rights. discovery of a significant environmental commissioned, warrant or petty officer
impact from this rule. or a Federal, State, or local law
I. Civil Justice Reform enforcement officer designated by or
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 assisting the COTP to act on his behalf.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (5) Vessel operators desiring to enter
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to (water), Reporting and recordkeeping or operate within the safety zone shall
minimize litigation, eliminate requirements, Security measures, contact the COTP or his on-scene
ambiguity, and reduce burden. Waterways. representative to request permission to
For the reasons discussed in the do so. The COTP or a designated
J. Protection of Children preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 representative may be contacted via
We have analyzed this rule under CFR part 165 as follows: VHF Channel 16 or at 313–568–9464.
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Vessel operators given permission to
Children from Environmental Health PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION enter or operate in the safety zone must
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS comply with all directions given to
an economically significant rule and them by the COTP or his on-scene
does not create an environmental risk to ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 representative.
health or risk to safety that may continues to read as follows:
Dated: August 16, 2016.
disproportionately affect children. Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Scott B. Lemasters,
K. Indian Tribal Governments Department of Homeland Security Delegation Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
This rule does not have tribal No. 0170.1. Port Detroit.
implications under Executive Order ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0751 to read as [FR Doc. 2016–19846 Filed 8–18–16; 8:45 am]
13175, Consultation and Coordination follows: BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
with Indian Tribal Governments,
§ 165.T09–0751 Safety Zone; Port Huron
because it does not have a substantial Float-Down, St. Clair River, Port Huron, MI.
direct effect on one or more Indian DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
tribes, on the relationship between the (a) Location. The following area is a
Federal Government and Indian tribes, temporary safety zone: All U.S.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
or on the distribution of power and navigable waters of southern Lake
Administration
responsibilities between the Federal Huron and the St. Clair River adjacent
Government and Indian tribes. to Port Huron, MI, beginning at
50 CFR Part 635
Lighthouse Beach and encompassing all
L. Energy Effects U.S. waters of the St. Clair River bound [Docket No. 150817722–6703–02]
This action is not a ‘‘significant by a line starting at a point on land
energy action’’ under Executive Order north of Coast Guard Station Port Huron RIN 0648–BF10
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations at position 43°00′25″ N.; 082°25′20″ W.,
extending east to the international Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES

boundary to a point at position Archival Tag Management Measures
Distribution, or Use.
43°00′25″ N.; 082°25′02″ W., following AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
M. Technical Standards south along the international boundary Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
This rule does not use technical to a point at position 42°54′30″ N.; Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
standards. Therefore, we did not 082°27′41″ W., extending west to a point Commerce.
consider the use of voluntary consensus on land just north of Stag Island at
ACTION: Final rule.
standards. position 42°54′30″ N.; 082°27′58″ W.,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:10 Aug 18, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM 19AUR1
Document Created: 2016-08-19 01:34:58
Document Modified: 2016-08-19 01:34:58
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 12 p.m. through 8 p.m. on August 21, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this temporary final rule, call or email Lieutenant Selena Warnke, Prevention Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone 313-568- 9508, email [email protected] If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
FR Citation		81 FR 55374
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways
81 FR 55374 - Safety Zone; Port Huron Float-Down, St. Clair River, Port Huron, MI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 161 (August 19, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
