81 FR 5712 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 22 (February 3, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 22 (February 3, 2016)
| Page Range | 5712-5715 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02007 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 5712-5715] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02007] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that [[Page 5713]] antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after February 2016, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity To Request A Review: Not later than the last day of February 2016,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in February for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings Brazil: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A-351-838............... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Stainless Steel Bar, A-351-825................... 2/1/15-1/31/16 France: Uranium, A-427-818........................... 2/1/15-1/31/16 India: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, 2/1/15-1/31/16 A-533-817....................................... Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A-533-813........... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A-533-840............... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Stainless Steel Bar, A-533-810................... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Indonesia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, 2/1/15-1/31/16 A-560-805....................................... Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A-560-802........... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Italy: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-475- 2/1/15-1/31/16 828................................................. Japan: Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings, A-588-602.. 2/1/15-1/31/16 Stainless Steel Bar, A-588-833................... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Malaysia: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Fittings, A-557- 2/1/15-1/31/16 809................................................. Mexico: Large Residential Washers, A-201-842......... 2/1/15-1/31/16 [[Page 5714]] Phillippines: Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe 2/1/15-1/31/16 Fittings, A-565-801................................. Republic of Korea: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, 2/1/15-1/31/16 A-580-836....................................... Large Residential Washers, A-580-868............. 2/1/15-1/31/16 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A-552-802............... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Steel Wire Garment Hangers, A-552-812............ 2/1/15-1/31/16 Utility Scale Wind Towers, A-552-814............. 2/1/15-1/31/16 Taiwan: Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 7/31/14-1/31/16 Products, A-583-853................................. Thailand: Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A-549-822......... 2/1/15-1/31/16 The People's Republic of China: Certain Preserved Mushrooms, A-570-851........... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 7/31/14-1/31/16 Products, A-570-010............................. Frozen Warmwater Shrimp, A-570-893............... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Heavy Forged Hand Tools,, With or Without 2/1/15-1/31/16 Handles, A-570-803.............................. Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes, A-570-929.... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Uncovered Innerspring Units, A-570-928........... 2/1/15-1/31/16 Utility Scale Wind Towers, A-570-981............. 2/1/15-1/31/16 Countervailing Duty Proceedings India: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, 1/1/15-12/31/15 C-533-818....................................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand, C-533-829 1/1/15-12/31/15 Indonesia: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 1/1/15 -12/31/15 Plate, C-560-806.................................... Republic of Korea: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate, 1/1/15-12/31/15 C-580-837....................................... Large Residential Washers, C-580-869............. 1/1/15-12/31/15 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Steel Wire Garment 1/1/15-12/31/15 Hangers, C-552-813.................................. The People's Republic of China: Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic 6/10/14 -12/31/15 Products, C-570-011............................. Utility Scale Wind Towers, C-570-982............. 1/1/15-12/31/15 Suspension Agreements None ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity [[Page 5715]] was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of February 2016. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of February 2016, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: January 28, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2016-02007 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![5712 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices
interested parties.3 Because the United States during the POR specified We will instruct CBP to allow, at the
Department has certain concerns with by the Department’s regulations.8 option of the importer, the posting, until
the CBP entry data, on January 21, 2016, the completion of the review, of a bond
Period of Review
we also issued a questionnaire to Anji or security in lieu of a cash deposit for
DaSol in order to seek additional Pursuant to 19 CFR certain entries of the subject
information with respect the data.4 The 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A), the POR for the new merchandise from Anji DaSol in
Department intends to address these, shipper review of Anji DaSol is accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii)
and any remaining issues, after December 1, 2014, through November of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e).
initiation of this NSR.5 We intend to 30, 2015. Because Anji DaSol certified that it
request entry documents from CBP in exports and produces the subject
order to confirm certain information Initiation of New Shipper Review merchandise that is the subject of this
reported by Anji DaSol. The Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the new shipper review, we will instruct
continuation of the new shipper review Act, 19 CFR 351.214(b), and based on CBP to permit the use of a bond only for
will be contingent upon confirmation of the information on the record, the entries of subject merchandise which
the information reported in the review Department finds that Anji DaSol meets Anji DaSol exported and produced.
request. the threshold requirements for initiation Interested parties requiring access to
Anji DaSol stated that it is the of a new shipper review of its shipment proprietary information in this new
producer and exporter of the subject of solar cells from the PRC.9 However, shipper review should submit
merchandise upon which its request for if the information supplied by Anji applications for disclosure under
a new shipper review is based. Pursuant DaSol is later found to be incorrect or administrative protective order in
to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act insufficient during the course of this accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 and
and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), Anji DaSol proceeding, the Department may rescind 351.306.
certified that it did not export solar cells the review or apply facts available This initiation and notice are
to the United States during the period pursuant to section 776 of the Act, published in accordance with section
of investigation (‘‘POI’’). In addition, depending upon the facts on the record. 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), 351.214 and 351.221(c)(1)(i).
the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), the Department will publish the notice Dated: January 27, 2016.
Anji DaSol certified that, since the of initiation of a new shipper review no James Maeder,
initiation of the investigation, it has later than the last day of the month Senior Director Antidumping and
never been affiliated with any PRC following the anniversary or semiannual Countervailing Duty Operations, Office I.
exporter or producer who exported solar anniversary month of the order. The [FR Doc. 2016–02002 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am]
cells to the United States during the Department intends to issue the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
POI, including those not individually preliminary results of this new shipper
examined during the investigation. As review no later than 180 days from the
required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), date of initiation, and the final results DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Anji DaSol also certified that its export of this review no later than 90 days after
activities were not controlled by the International Trade Administration
the date the preliminary results are
central government of the PRC.6
issued.10
In addition to the certifications Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
described above, pursuant to 19 CFR It is the Department’s usual practice,
Order, Finding, or Suspended
351.214(b)(2)(iv), Anji DaSol submitted in cases involving non-market
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
documentation establishing the economies (‘‘NME’’), to require that a
Administrative Review
following: (1) The date on which the company seeking to establish eligibility
subject merchandise was first entered, for an AD rate separate from the NME- AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for wide entity rate provide evidence of de International Trade Administration,
consumption in the United States; (2) jure and de facto absence of government Department of Commerce.
the volume of its first shipment; and (3) control over the company’s export FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
the date of its first sale to an unaffiliated activities. Accordingly, we will issue a Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
customer in the United States.7 questionnaire to Anji DaSol which will Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
The Department conducted a CBP include a section requesting information Enforcement and Compliance,
database query and confirmed by with regard to its export activities for International Trade Administration,
examining the results that the sale of the purpose of establishing its eligibility U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
subject merchandise that Anji DaSol for a separate rate. The new shipper Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
reported to the Department entered the review of Anji DaSol will proceed if the Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
response provides sufficient indication 482–4735.
3 See Letter to All Interested Parties ‘‘Request for that the exporter is not subject to either SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
a New Shipper Review of Crystalline Silicon de jure or de facto government control
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into with respect to its exports of solar cells. Background
Modules, from the People’s Republic of China 12/
01/2014–11/30/15: Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science Each year during the anniversary
& Technology Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 21, 2016 8 See 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(i)(A). month of the publication of an
(‘‘CBP Data’’). 9 See, generally, Memorandum to the File through antidumping or countervailing duty
4 Due to the business proprietary nature of the
Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD Operations,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CBP data, see Initiation Checklist at Part I, question
order, finding, or suspended
Office IV, ‘‘Initiation of Antidumping New Shipper
15 for further information. Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, investigation, an interested party, as
5 See Letter to Anji DaSol, ‘‘Request for New Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on People’s Republic of China: Anji DaSol Solar Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Initiation
Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s
may request, in accordance with 19 CFR
Checklist,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
Republic of China,’’ dated January 21, 2016. (‘‘Initiation Checklist’’). 351.213, that the Department of
6 See NSR Request, at Exhibit 1. 10 See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act; 19 CFR Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct
7 Id. at Exhibit 2. 351.214(i). an administrative review of that
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Feb 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_5734/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices 5715
was conducted, the NME entity’s entries Dated: January 28, 2016. applicants for the Interim CCF
were not subject to the review and the Christian Marsh, Agreement is used to determine their
rate for the NME entity is not subject to Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping eligibility to participate in the CCF
change as a result of that review and Countervailing Duty Operations. Program. The information collected
(although the rate for the individual [FR Doc. 2016–02007 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am] from agreement holders for the
exporter may change as a function of the BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Certificate Family of Forms is used to
finding that the exporter is part of the identify their program eligible vessels,
NME entity). their program projects and to certify the
Following initiation of an DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE cost of a project at completion. The
antidumping administrative review information collected on the deposit/
National Oceanic and Atmospheric withdrawal report form is required to
when there is no review requested of the Administration
NME entity, the Department will ensure that agreement holders are
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all complying with fund deposit/
Submission for OMB Review; withdrawal requirements established in
exporters not named in the initiation Comment Request
notice, including those that were program regulations and properly
suspended at the NME entity rate. The Department of Commerce will accounting for fund activity on their
submit to the Office of Management and Federal income tax returns. The
All requests must be filed information collected on the deposit/
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
electronically in Enforcement and withdrawal report must also be reported
following proposal for collection of
Compliance’s Antidumping and semi-annually to the Secretary of
information under the provisions of the
Countervailing Duty Centralized Treasury in accordance with the Tax
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) Reform Act.
Chapter 35).
on Enforcement and Compliance’s Affected Public: Businesses or other
Agency: National Oceanic and
ACCESS Web site at http:// for-profit organizations.
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
access.trade.gov.4 Further, in Frequency: One time only, annually
Title: Interim Capital Constructions
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), and on occasion.
Fund Agreement, Family of Forms,
a copy of each request must be served Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
Certification and Deposit/Withdrawal
on the petitioner and each exporter or obtain or retain benefits.
Report.
producer specified in the request. This information collection request
OMB Control Number: 0648–0041.
The Department will publish in the Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 34–82 may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation and 88–14. the instructions to view Department of
of Administrative Review of Type of Request: Regular (extension of Commerce collections currently under
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty a currently approved information review by OMB.
Order, Finding, or Suspended collection). Written comments and
Investigation’’ for requests received by Number of Respondents: 1,445. recommendations for the proposed
the last day of February 2016. If the Average Hours per Response: Deposit/ information collection should be sent
Department does not receive, by the last withdrawal form, 20 minutes; within 30 days of publication of this
day of February 2016, a request for application for program benefits, 3 notice to OIRA_Submission@
review of entries covered by an order, hours and 30 minutes; certificate, 1 omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
finding, or suspended investigation hour. Dated: January 29, 2016.
listed in this notice and for the period Burden Hours: 2,732. Sarah Brabson,
identified above, the Department will Needs and Uses: This request is for NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or extension of a currently approved [FR Doc. 2016–01983 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am]
countervailing duties on those entries at information collection. BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or Respondents will be commercial
bond for) estimated antidumping or fishing industry individuals,
countervailing duties required on those partnerships, and corporations which
entries at the time of entry, or DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
entered into Capital Construction Fund
withdrawal from warehouse, for (CCF) agreements with the Secretary of Department of the Army
consumption and to continue to collect Commerce allowing deferral of Federal
the cash deposit previously ordered. taxation on fishing vessel income [Docket ID: USA–2016–HQ–0002]
For the first administrative review of deposited into the fund for use in the
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
any order, there will be no assessment acquisition, construction, or
Records
of antidumping or countervailing duties reconstruction of fishing vessels.
on entries of subject merchandise Deferred taxes are recaptured by AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, reducing an agreement vessel’s basis for ACTION:Notice to delete a System of
for consumption during the relevant depreciation by the amount withdrawn Records.
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of from the fund for its acquisition,
the order, if such a gap period is construction, or reconstruction. The SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
applicable to the period of review. interim Capital Construction Fund proposes to delete a system of records,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Agreement and Certificate Family of A0351 AMC, ‘‘Student/Faculty Records:
This notice is not required by statute
Forms is required pursuant to 50 CFR AMC Schools Systems’’ in its inventory
but is published as a service to the
part 259.30 and P.L. 99–514 (The Tax of record systems subject to the Privacy
international trading community.
Reform Act, 1986). The deposit/ Act of 1974, as amended. This system
4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
withdrawal information collected from was used to determine applicant
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
agreement holders is required pursuant eligibility, monitor individual’s
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR to 50 CFR part 259.35 and P.L. 99–514. progress, maintain record of student/
39263 (July 6, 2011). The information collected from faculty achievements, and to provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Feb 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_5734/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-03 00:39:52
Document Modified: 2016-02-03 00:39:52
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 5712 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR