81 FR 57801 - Safety Zone; Nahant Bay, Marblehead, MA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 164 (August 24, 2016)

Page Range		57801-57803
FR Document		2016-20389

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of the Captain of the Port (COTP) Boston Zone within a 2,500-yard radius around a position approximately 6nm Northeast of Nahant Bay, MA, for a Department of Defense (DOD) Training Exercise. The safety zone is needed to protect Navy personnel, support vessels, and the maritime public from the hazards associated with this training exercise. Entering into, transiting through, mooring, or anchoring within this safety zone during periods of enforcement is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Sector Boston COTP or the COTP's designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57801-57803]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0735]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Nahant Bay, Marblehead, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
navigable waters of the Captain of the Port (COTP) Boston Zone within a 
2,500-yard radius around a position approximately 6nm Northeast of 
Nahant Bay, MA, for a Department of Defense (DOD) Training Exercise. 
The safety zone is needed to protect Navy personnel, support vessels, 
and the maritime public from the hazards associated with this training 
exercise. Entering into, transiting through, mooring, or anchoring 
within this safety zone during periods of enforcement is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Coast Guard Sector Boston COTP or the COTP's 
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 24, 2016 from 7:00 p.m. through 
10:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0735 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email, Mark Cutter, Sector Boston Waterways Management 
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 617-223-4000, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

COTP Captain of the Port
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
DOD Department of Defense
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
NAD 83 North American Data of 1983
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule 
because publishing a NPRM would be impracticable. DOD Training Exercise 
will take place on August 24, 2016. The DOD Exercise will consist of 
High-altitude military parachuting freefall insertion approximately 6nm 
Northeast of Nahant, MA, in position 42[deg] 27.000' N., 070[deg] 
50.000' W. This exercise will present safety hazards and risks to Navy 
personnel, support vessels, and the maritime public during the 
exercise. It would be impracticable to delay promulgating this rule, as 
it would not be possible to conduct notice and comment rulemaking 
before the date of the exercise. For this reason, the Coast Guard finds 
it impracticable to delay this regulation.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be impracticable for the same reasons specified 
above.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The

[[Page 57802]]

COTP has determined that the potential hazards associated with this DOD 
Training Exercise create a serious safety concern for anyone transiting 
within a 2,500-yard radius of position 42[deg] 27.000' N., 070[deg] 
50.000' W. This rule is needed to protect Navy personnel, vessels, and 
the normal marine traffic in the navigable waters within the safety 
zone while this exercise is be being conducted.

IV. Discussion of Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. 
on August 24, 2016. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters 
within a 2,500-yard radius of position 42[deg] 27.000' N., 070[deg] 
50.000' W. The duration of the zone is intended to protect Navy 
personnel, vessels, and normal marine traffic in these navigable waters 
during the DOD training exercise. No vessel or person will be permitted 
to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or 
a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, and duration of the safety zone. The implementation of this 
temporary safety zone is necessary for the protection of all waterway 
users. The size of the zone is the minimum necessary to provide 
adequate protection for the waterway users, adjoining areas, and the 
public. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit around this 
safety zone. Any hardships experienced by persons or vessels are 
considered minimal compared to the interest in protecting the public.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone that will prohibit entry within 2,500 yards 
of position 42[deg] 27.000' N., 070[deg] 50.000' W. during the DOD 
training exercise. It is categorically excluded from further review 
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination will be available in the docket 
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information 
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact 
from this rule.

[[Page 57803]]

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment Rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0735 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0735  Safety Zone; DOD Training Exercise, Nahant Bay, 
Marblehead, MA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable 
waters within 2,500-yards of 42[deg] 27.000' N., 070[deg] 50.000' W. 
while the DOD Training Exercise is underway.
    (b) Regulations. While this security zone is being enforced, the 
following regulations, along with those contained in Sec.  165.33, 
apply:
    (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart B of this 
part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of 
this section unless authorized by the COTP or a COTP designated 
representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's 
representative by VHF-FM channel 16 or by phone at (617) 223-5757 
(Sector Boston Command Center). Those in the safety zone must comply 
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or a 
COTP designated representative.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7:00 
p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on August 24, 2016.
    (d) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer or any 
federal, state, or local law enforcement officer who has been 
designated by the COTP to act on the COTP's behalf. The COTP's 
representative may be on a Coast vessel, a Coast Guard Auxiliary 
vessel, state or local law enforcement, or a location on shore.
    (e) Penalties. Those who violate this section are subject to the 
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.

    Dated: August 19, 2016.
C. C. Gelzer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2016-20389 Filed 8-22-16; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

57802 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

COTP has determined that the potential B. Impact on Small Entities power and responsibilities among the
hazards associated with this DOD The Regulatory Flexibility Act of various levels of government. We have
Training Exercise create a serious safety 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, analyzed this rule under that Order and
concern for anyone transiting within a requires Federal agencies to consider have determined that it is consistent
2,500-yard radius of position 42° 27.000′ the potential impact of regulations on with the fundamental federalism
N., 070° 50.000′ W. This rule is needed small entities during rulemaking. The principles and preemption requirements
to protect Navy personnel, vessels, and described in Executive Order 13132.
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
the normal marine traffic in the Also, this rule does not have tribal
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
navigable waters within the safety zone implications under Executive Order
that are independently owned and
while this exercise is be being 13175, Consultation and Coordination
operated and are not dominant in their
conducted. with Indian Tribal Governments,
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
IV. Discussion of Rule with populations of less than 50,000. because it does not have a substantial
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. direct effect on one or more Indian
This rule establishes a safety zone tribes, on the relationship between the
from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a Federal Government and Indian tribes,
August 24, 2016. The safety zone will
substantial number of small entities. or on the distribution of power and
cover all navigable waters within a
While some owners or operators of responsibilities between the Federal
2,500-yard radius of position 42° 27.000′
vessels intending to transit the safety Government and Indian tribes. If you
N., 070° 50.000′ W. The duration of the
zone may be small entities, for the believe this rule has implications for
zone is intended to protect Navy
reasons stated in section V.A above, this federalism or Indian tribes, please
personnel, vessels, and normal marine
rule will not have a significant contact the person listed in the FOR
traffic in these navigable waters during
economic impact on any vessel owner FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
the DOD training exercise. No vessel or
or operator. above.
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
permission from the COTP or a Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104– The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
designated representative.
121), we want to assist small entities in of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
V. Regulatory Analyses understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of
We developed this rule after would affect your small business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In
considering numerous statutes and organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions
executive orders related to rulemaking. jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a
Below we summarize our analyses concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the
based on a number of these statutes and compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of
executive orders, and we discuss First listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
Amendment rights of protestors. CONTACT section. more in any one year. Though this rule
Small businesses may send comments will not result in such an expenditure,
A. Regulatory Planning and Review on the actions of Federal employees we do discuss the effects of this rule
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble.
direct agencies to assess the costs and compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment
benefits of available regulatory the Small Business and Agriculture
alternatives and, if regulation is Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman We have analyzed this rule under
necessary, to select regulatory and the Regional Small Business Department of Homeland Security
approaches that maximize net benefits. Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Management Directive 023–01 and
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the Ombudsman evaluates these actions Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
importance of quantifying both costs annually and rates each agency’s which guide the Coast Guard in
and benefits, of reducing costs, of responsiveness to small business. If you complying with the National
harmonizing rules, and of promoting wish to comment on actions by Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
flexibility. This rule has not been employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The determined that this action is one of a
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Coast Guard will not retaliate against category of actions that do not
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed small entities that question or complain individually or cumulatively have a
by the Office of Management and about this rule or any policy or action significant effect on the human
Budget. of the Coast Guard. environment. This rule involves a safety
This regulatory action determination zone that will prohibit entry within
is based on the size, location, and C. Collection of Information 2,500 yards of position 42° 27.000′ N.,
duration of the safety zone. The This rule will not call for a new 070° 50.000′ W. during the DOD training
implementation of this temporary safety collection of information under the exercise. It is categorically excluded
zone is necessary for the protection of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 from further review under paragraph
all waterway users. The size of the zone U.S.C. 3501–3520). 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
is the minimum necessary to provide Instruction. An environmental analysis
adequate protection for the waterway D. Federalism and Indian Tribal checklist supporting this determination
Governments
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

users, adjoining areas, and the public. and a Categorical Exclusion
Vessel traffic will be able to safely A rule has implications for federalism Determination will be available in the
transit around this safety zone. Any under Executive Order 13132, docket where indicated under
hardships experienced by persons or Federalism, if it has a substantial direct ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
vessels are considered minimal effect on the States, on the relationship information that may lead to the
compared to the interest in protecting between the national government and discovery of a significant environmental
the public. the States, or on the distribution of impact from this rule.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Aug 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 57803

G. Protest Activities COTP’s behalf. The COTP’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Coast Guard respects the First representative may be on a Coast vessel,
Background
Amendment Rights of protesters. a Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel, state or
local law enforcement, or a location on Atlantic HMS are managed under the
Protesters are asked to contact the 2006 Consolidated HMS Fishery
person listed in the FOR FURTHER shore.
(e) Penalties. Those who violate this Management Plan (FMP). Implementing
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
section are subject to the penalties set regulations at 50 CFR part 635 are
coordinate protest activities so that your issued under the authority of the
forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C.
message can be received without Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
192.
jeopardizing the safety or security of Conservation and Management Act
people, places or vessels. Dated: August 19, 2016.
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801
C. C. Gelzer,
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 et seq., and Atlantic Tunas Convention
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Act (ATCA), 16 U.S.C. 927 et seq. ATCA
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Port Boston.
requires the Secretary of Commerce
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping [FR Doc. 2016–20389 Filed 8–22–16; 4:15 pm]
(Secretary) to promulgate regulations as
requirements, Security measures, BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
may be necessary and appropriate to
Waterways. implement ICCAT recommendations.
For the reasons discussed in the At its 24th Annual Meeting in 2015,
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ICCAT adopted Recommendation 15–06
CFR part 165 as follows: on ‘‘Porbeagle [Sharks] Caught in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association with ICCAT Fisheries.’’
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION Administration Recommendation 15–06 requires,
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS among other things, fishing vessels
50 CFR Part 635 ‘‘. . . to promptly release unharmed, to
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
[Docket No. 160328287–6745–02] the extent practicable, porbeagle sharks
continues to read as follows:
caught in association with ICCAT
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; RIN 0648–BF94
fisheries when brought alive alongside
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; for taking on board the vessel.’’
Department of Homeland Security Delegation Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(HMS); Porbeagle Shark Management Recommendation 15–06 notes that,
No. 0170.1.
Measures according to the ICCAT Standing
■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0735 to read as Committee for Research and Statistics
follows: AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (SCRS), biomass of northwest Atlantic
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and and northeast Atlantic porbeagle sharks
§ 165.T01–0735 Safety Zone; DOD Training Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), is depleted to well below the biomass at
Exercise, Nahant Bay, Marblehead, MA. Commerce. maximum sustainable yield, but recent
(a) Location. The following area is a ACTION: Final rule. fishing mortality is below the fishing
safety zone: All navigable waters within mortality at maximum sustainable yield
2,500-yards of 42° 27.000′ N., 070° SUMMARY: This final rule implements (i.e., the stocks are overfished but
50.000′ W. while the DOD Training the International Commission for the overfishing is not occurring).
Exercise is underway. Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) Recommendation 15–06 further notes
(b) Regulations. While this security Recommendation 15–06 regarding that the 2008 and 2012 Ecological Risk
zone is being enforced, the following porbeagle sharks (Lamna nasus) caught Assessments concluded that the
regulations, along with those contained in association with ICCAT fisheries. porbeagle shark was among the most
in § 165.33, apply: Recommendation 15–06 requires, vulnerable of shark species, which, even
(1) Under the general safety zone among other things, fishing vessels to at low fishing mortality levels, makes it
regulations in subpart B of this part, you promptly release unharmed, to the more susceptible to overfishing. Thus,
may not enter the safety zone described extent practicable, porbeagle sharks Recommendation 15–06 was adopted by
in paragraph (a) of this section unless caught in association with ICCAT ICCAT to reduce fishing mortality of
authorized by the COTP or a COTP fisheries when brought alive alongside porbeagle sharks caught in association
designated representative. for taking on board the vessel. This with ICCAT fisheries in order to reduce
(2) To seek permission to enter, action affects fishermen fishing in the porbeagle shark fishing even further,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s commercial highly migratory species and thus assist in rebuilding stocks
representative by VHF–FM channel 16 (HMS) pelagic longline fishery and the which are currently overfished. On June
or by phone at (617) 223–5757 (Sector HMS recreational fisheries for tunas, 15, 2016 (81 FR 39017), NMFS
Boston Command Center). Those in the swordfish, and billfish in the Atlantic published a proposed rule to consider
safety zone must comply with all lawful Ocean, including the Caribbean Sea and changes to the regulations at 50 CFR
orders or directions given to them by the Gulf of Mexico. This action implements part 635 consistent with
COTP or a COTP designated an ICCAT recommendation, consistent Recommendation 15–06. The proposed
representative. with the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act rule contains details that are not
(c) Enforcement period. This section (ATCA), and will further domestic repeated here. The comment period on
will be enforced from 7:00 p.m. until management objectives under the the proposed rule ended on July 15,
10:00 p.m. on August 24, 2016. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 2016.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

(d) Definitions. As used in this Conservation and Management Act Domestically, porbeagle sharks are
section, designated representative (Magnuson-Stevens Act). managed pursuant to a rebuilding plan
means is any Coast Guard DATES: Effective on September 23, 2016. established in Amendment 2 to the 2006
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Consolidated HMS FMP (73 FR 35788,
or any federal, state, or local law Larry Redd, Carrie Soltanoff, or Karyl June 24, 2008 as corrected at 73 FR
enforcement officer who has been Brewster-Geisz by phone at 301–427– 40658, July 15, 2008). Under current
designated by the COTP to act on the 8503. regulations, commercial and

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:56 Aug 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\24AUR1.SGM 24AUR1

Document Created: 2016-08-24 03:03:01
Document Modified: 2016-08-24 03:03:01

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective on August 24, 2016 from 7:00 p.m. through 10:00 p.m.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email, Mark Cutter, Sector Boston Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 617-223-4000, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 57801
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 57801 - Safety Zone; Nahant Bay, Marblehead, MA

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 164 (August 24, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard