81 FR 57942 - Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Annual Updates to License Renewal Application
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 164 (August 24, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 164 (August 24, 2016)
| Page Range | 57942-57944 | |
| FR Document | 2016-20272 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 57942-57944] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-20272] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323; NRC-2009-0552] Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2; Annual Updates to License Renewal Application AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Exemption; issuance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an exemption in response to an August 1, 2016, request from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), which requested an exemption from the requirement to submit annual updates to its license renewal application (LRA) for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP), Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff reviewed this request and determined that it is appropriate to grant the exemption while the review of the LRA remains suspended. DATE: The exemption is effective on August 24, 2016. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2009-0552 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2009-0552. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; [[Page 57943]] email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Wentzel, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6459; email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background By letter dated November 23, 2009 (ADAMS Package No. ML093340125), PG&E submitted an application pursuant to part 54 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) for the renewal of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-80 and DPR-82 for DCPP. A notice of acceptance for docketing of the application and opportunity for hearing regarding renewal of the facility operating licenses was published in the Federal Register on January 21, 2010 (75 FR 3493). On June 21, 2016, PG&E notified the NRC that it had reached an agreement in principle with various stakeholders to not proceed with the DCPP license renewal and requested that the NRC suspend activity on the LRA, pending approval of the agreement by the California Public Utilities Commission (ADAMS Accession No. ML16173A454). On July 28, 2016, the NRC staff notified PG&E that it had suspended its review of the DCPP LRA (ADAMS Accession No. ML16193A599). Although the NRC staff has suspended its review of the DCPP LRA, the NRC's regulations at 10 CFR 54.21(b) would still require PG&E to provide an annual update to its LRA identifying changes made to the current licensing basis (CLB) for DCPP that materially affect the LRA, absent this exemption request. II. Request/Action Pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15, ``Specific exemptions,'' which references 10 CFR 50.12, PG&E's letter dated August 1, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16214A369), requested an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21, ``Contents of application--technical information,'' paragraph (b), related to the schedule for submitting periodic updates to the DCPP LRA, while the NRC staff's review of the DCPP LRA is suspended. Given PG&E's request for approval from the California Public Utilities Commission to not proceed with license renewal for DCPP, PG&E is requesting exemption from the requirements in 10 CFR 54.21(b). Should the California Public Utilities Commission deny PG&E's request and direct PG&E to pursue license renewal, PG&E would provide an amendment to the DCPP LRA that identifies changes to the CLB of the facility that materially affect the contents of the LRA by a date agreed upon between PG&E and the NRC. III. Discussion Pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15, the Commission may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of the regulations of 10 CFR part 54, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, when (1) the exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and (2) special circumstances are present. As applicable to the requested exemption, special circumstances exist when application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii)). The purpose of 10 CFR 54.21(b) is to ensure that the effect of changes to a renewal applicant's existing licensing basis is evaluated during the review of a renewal application (56 FR 64954). As referenced above, the NRC staff has suspended its review of the DCPP LRA in response to PG&E's June 21, 2016, request. As such, the NRC staff would not review an update to the DCPP LRA, should it be provided; therefore, updating the LRA while the review is suspended is unnecessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. Should PG&E resume the license renewal process for DCPP, the NRC will require it to provide an amendment to the DCPP LRA that identifies applicable changes to the CLB of the facility since the period of time covered in PG&E's December 21, 2015, update (ADAMS Accession No. ML16004A149) by a date agreed upon between PG&E and the NRC. Authorized by Law Pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15, and in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC may grant an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR part 54, if the exemption is authorized by law. The exemption is authorized by law in that no other prohibition of law exists to preclude the activities which would be authorized by the exemption. Granting this exemption will provide PG&E with relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(b) while review of the DCPP LRA is suspended and will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the NRC's regulations. Therefore, this exemption request is authorized by law. No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 54.21(b) is to ensure that changes made to the CLB of a facility that materially affect an LRA are reflected in a timely manner over the course of the NRC staff's review. The requested exemption is administrative in nature, in that it pertains to the schedule for submitting periodic updates of an application for renewal under 10 CFR part 54. Based on the nature of the requested exemption as described above, no new accident precursors are created by the exemption. As a result, neither the probability, nor the consequences, of postulated accidents are increased. Therefore, the requested exemption does not result in any undue risk to public health and safety. Consistent With Common Defense and Security The requested exemption would exempt PG&E from providing updates to the DCPP LRA while review of the LRA is suspended. This proposed change has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and security is not impacted by the exemption. Special Circumstances Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are present whenever application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii)). [[Page 57944]] As discussed above, the requested exemption will exempt PG&E from submitting LRA updates while the NRC's review of the application is suspended. Because the NRC staff would not review an update to the DCPP LRA, should it be provided, application of 10 CFR 54.21(b) is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule. Therefore, special circumstances exist under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion From Environmental Review With respect to the exemption's impact on the quality of the human environment, the NRC has determined that this specific exemption request is eligible for categorical exclusion as identified in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an exemption from the requirements of any regulation of 10 CFR chapter 1 (which includes 10 CFR 54.21(b)) is an action that is a categorical exclusion, provided that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i) through (vi). The NRC staff's determination that each of the applicable criteria for this categorical exclusion is met as follows: I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no significant hazards consideration. Staff Analysis: The criteria for determining if an exemption involves a significant hazards consideration are found in 10 CFR 50.92. The action involves only changes regarding the submission of updates to an application for which the licensing review is currently suspended. Therefore, there are no significant hazard considerations because granting the exemption would not: (1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite. Staff Analysis: The proposed action involves only a change regarding the submission of updates, which is administrative in nature, and does not involve any changes in the types or significant increase in the amounts of effluents that may be released offsite. III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure. Staff Analysis: Since the proposed action involves only a change regarding the submission of updates, which is administrative in nature, it does not contribute to any significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is no significant construction impact. Staff Analysis: Since the proposed action involves only a change regarding the submission of updates, which is administrative in nature; it does not involve any construction impact. V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no significant increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological accidents. Staff Analysis: The proposed action involves only a change regarding the submission of updates, which is administrative in nature and does not impact the probability or consequences of accidents. VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The requirements from which this exemption is sought involve 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(B) (reporting requirements) and 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(G) (scheduling requirements). Staff Analysis: The exemption request involves requirements in both of these categories because it involves suspending the requirement contained in 10 CFR 54.21(b) to provide an update to the DCPP LRA each year following submittal of the LRA. IV. Conclusions The NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15, and in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, the exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and security. Also, special circumstances exist under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). Therefore, the NRC hereby grants PG&E this exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(b) to allow PG&E to dispense with the submission of updates to the DCPP LRA while the NRC's review of the LRA is suspended. Should PG&E resume the license renewal process for DCPP, the NRC will require it to provide an amendment to the DCPP LRA that identifies applicable changes to the CLB of the facility since the period of time covered in PG&E's December 21, 2015, update by a date agreed upon between PG&E and the NRC. Additionally, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the Commission has determined that the exemption request meets the applicable categorical exclusion criteria set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the granting of this exemption will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th Day of August 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jane E. Marshall, Acting Director, Division of License Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2016-20272 Filed 8-23-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![57942 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2016 / Notices
interested persons regarding this matter. NUCLEAR REGULATORY present oral statements can be obtained
The Subcommittee will gather COMMISSION from the Web site cited above or by
information, analyze relevant issues and contacting the identified DFO.
facts, and formulate proposed positions Advisory Committee on Reactor Moreover, in view of the possibility that
and actions, as appropriate, for Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
deliberation by the Full Committee. ACRS Subcommittee on T–H adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
Phenomena; Notice of Meeting to facilitate the conduct of the meeting,
Members of the public desiring to
persons planning to attend should check
provide oral statements and/or written The ACRS Subcommittees on T–H
with these references if such
comments should notify the Designated Phenomenon and Metallurgy & Reactor
rescheduling would result in a major
Federal Official (DFO), John Lai Fuels will hold a meeting on September
inconvenience.
(Telephone 301–415–5197 or Email: 19, 2016, Room T–2B1, 11545 Rockville
If attending this meeting, please enter
John.Lai@nrc.gov) five days prior to the Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
through the One White Flint North
meeting, if possible, so that appropriate The meeting will be open to public
building, 11555 Rockville Pike,
arrangements can be made. Thirty-five attendance with the exception of
Rockville, MD. After registering with
hard copies of each presentation or portions that may be closed to protect
security, please contact Mr. Theron
information that is proprietary pursuant
handout should be provided to the DFO Brown (Telephone 240–888–9835) to be
to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4). The agenda for
thirty minutes before the meeting. In escorted to the meeting room.
the subject meeting shall be as follows:
addition, one electronic copy of each Dated: August 16, 2016.
presentation should be emailed to the Monday, September 19, 2016—8:30 Mark L. Banks,
DFO one day before the meeting. If an a.m. Until 5 p.m.
Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory
electronic copy cannot be provided The Subcommittee will review the Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
within this timeframe, presenters fidelity of methods and codes for [FR Doc. 2016–20270 Filed 8–23–16; 8:45 am]
should provide the DFO with a CD operation at AREVA’s Extended Flow BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
containing each presentation at least Window (plant-specific Monticello).
thirty minutes before the meeting. The Subcommittee will hear
Electronic recordings will be permitted presentations by and hold discussions NUCLEAR REGULATORY
only during those portions of the with the NRC staff regarding this matter. COMMISSION
meeting that are open to the public. The Subcommittee will gather
[Docket Nos. 50–275 and 50–323; NRC–
Detailed procedures for the conduct of information, analyze relevant issues and 2009–0552]
and participation in ACRS meetings facts, and formulate proposed positions
were published in the Federal Register and actions, as appropriate, for Pacific Gas and Electric Company;
on October 21, 2015 (80 FR 63846). deliberation by the Full Committee. Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1
Members of the public desiring to and 2; Annual Updates to License
Detailed meeting agendas and meeting provide oral statements and/or written
transcripts are available on the NRC Renewal Application
comments should notify the Designated
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- Federal Official (DFO), Zena Abdullahi AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information (Telephone 301–415–8716 or Email: Commission.
regarding topics to be discussed, Zena.Abdullahi@nrc.gov) five days prior ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
changes to the agenda, whether the to the meeting, if possible, so that
meeting has been canceled or appropriate arrangements can be made. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
rescheduled, and the time allotted to Thirty-five hard copies of each Commission (NRC) is issuing an
present oral statements can be obtained presentation or handout should be exemption in response to an August 1,
from the Web site cited above or by provided to the DFO thirty minutes 2016, request from Pacific Gas and
contacting the identified DFO. before the meeting. In addition, one Electric Company (PG&E), which
electronic copy of each presentation requested an exemption from the
Moreover, in view of the possibility that
should be emailed to the DFO one day requirement to submit annual updates
the schedule for ACRS meetings may be
before the meeting. If an electronic copy to its license renewal application (LRA)
adjusted by the Chairman as necessary
cannot be provided within this for Diablo Canyon Power Plant (DCPP),
to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff reviewed
persons planning to attend should check timeframe, presenters should provide
the DFO with a CD containing each this request and determined that it is
with these references if such appropriate to grant the exemption
rescheduling would result in a major presentation at least thirty minutes
before the meeting. Electronic while the review of the LRA remains
inconvenience. suspended.
recordings will be permitted only
If attending this meeting, please enter during those portions of the meeting DATE: The exemption is effective on
through the One White Flint North that are open to the public. Detailed August 24, 2016.
Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, procedures for the conduct of and ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
Rockville, Maryland. After registering participation in ACRS meetings were NRC–2009–0552 when contacting the
with security, please contact Mr. Theron published in the Federal Register on NRC about the availability of
Brown (Telephone 240–888–9835) to be October 21, 2015, (80 FR 63846). information regarding this document.
escorted to the meeting room. Detailed meeting agendas and meeting You may obtain publicly-available
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Dated: August 17, 2016. transcripts are available on the NRC information related to this document
Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- using any of the following methods:
Mark L. Banks,
rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory regarding topics to be discussed, http://www.regulations.gov and search
Committee on Reactor Safeguards. changes to the agenda, whether the for Docket ID NRC–2009–0552. Address
[FR Doc. 2016–20266 Filed 8–23–16; 8:45 am] meeting has been canceled or questions about NRC dockets to Carol
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P rescheduled, and the time allotted to Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Aug 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM 24AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58106/page/1.svg)
![57944 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 24, 2016 / Notices
As discussed above, the requested Staff Analysis: Since the proposed a significant effect on the quality of the
exemption will exempt PG&E from action involves only a change regarding human environment.
submitting LRA updates while the the submission of updates, which is Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th
NRC’s review of the application is administrative in nature, it does not Day of August 2016.
suspended. Because the NRC staff contribute to any significant increase in For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
would not review an update to the occupational or public radiation Jane E. Marshall,
DCPP LRA, should it be provided, exposure. Acting Director, Division of License Renewal,
application of 10 CFR 54.21(b) is not IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
necessary to achieve the underlying no significant construction impact.
[FR Doc. 2016–20272 Filed 8–23–16; 8:45 am]
purpose of the rule. Therefore, special Staff Analysis: Since the proposed
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
circumstances exist under 10 CFR action involves only a change regarding
50.12(a)(2)(ii). the submission of updates, which is
administrative in nature; it does not
Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion NUCLEAR REGULATORY
involve any construction impact.
From Environmental Review COMMISSION
V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no
With respect to the exemption’s significant increase in the potential for Advisory Committee on Reactor
impact on the quality of the human or consequences from radiological Safeguards (ACRS) Meeting of the
environment, the NRC has determined accidents. ACRS Subcommittee on Digital I&C
that this specific exemption request is Staff Analysis: The proposed action Systems; Notice of Meeting
eligible for categorical exclusion as involves only a change regarding the
identified in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Under submission of updates, which is The ACRS Subcommittee on Digital
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an administrative in nature and does not I&C Systems will hold a meeting on
exemption from the requirements of any impact the probability or consequences September 7, 2016, Room T–2B1, 11545
regulation of 10 CFR chapter 1 (which of accidents. Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.
includes 10 CFR 54.21(b)) is an action VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The The meeting will be open to public
that is a categorical exclusion, provided requirements from which this attendance.
that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR exemption is sought involve 10 CFR The agenda for the subject meeting
51.22(c)(25)(i) through (vi). The NRC 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(B) (reporting shall be as follows:
staff’s determination that each of the requirements) and 10 CFR Wednesday, September 7, 2016—8:30
applicable criteria for this categorical 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(G) (scheduling a.m. Until 12 p.m.
exclusion is met as follows: requirements).
Staff Analysis: The exemption request The Subcommittee will review the
I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no Methods for Assuring Safety and
involves requirements in both of these
significant hazards consideration. Dependability when Applying Digital
categories because it involves
Staff Analysis: The criteria for Instrumentation and Control Systems.
suspending the requirement contained
determining if an exemption involves a The Subcommittee will hear
in 10 CFR 54.21(b) to provide an update
significant hazards consideration are presentations by and hold discussions
to the DCPP LRA each year following
found in 10 CFR 50.92. The action with the NRC staff, representatives from
submittal of the LRA.
involves only changes regarding the EPRI, and other interested persons
submission of updates to an application IV. Conclusions regarding this matter. The
for which the licensing review is The NRC has determined that, Subcommittee will gather information,
currently suspended. Therefore, there pursuant to 10 CFR 54.15, and in analyze relevant issues and facts, and
are no significant hazard considerations accordance with 10 CFR 50.12, the formulate proposed positions and
because granting the exemption would exemption is authorized by law, will not actions, as appropriate, for deliberation
not: present an undue risk to the public by the Full Committee.
(1) Involve a significant increase in health and safety, and is consistent with Members of the public desiring to
the probability or consequences of an the common defense and security. Also, provide oral statements and/or written
accident previously evaluated; or special circumstances exist under 10 comments should notify the Designated
(2) Create the possibility of a new or CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). Therefore, the NRC Federal Official (DFO), Christina
different kind of accident from any hereby grants PG&E this exemption from Antonescu (Telephone 301–415–6792 or
accident previously evaluated; or the requirements of 10 CFR 54.21(b) to Email: Christina.Antonescu@nrc.gov)
(3) Involve a significant reduction in allow PG&E to dispense with the five days prior to the meeting, if
a margin of safety. submission of updates to the DCPP LRA possible, so that appropriate
II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no while the NRC’s review of the LRA is arrangements can be made. Thirty-five
significant change in the types or suspended. Should PG&E resume the hard copies of each presentation or
significant increase in the amounts of license renewal process for DCPP, the handout should be provided to the DFO
any effluents that may be released NRC will require it to provide an thirty minutes before the meeting. In
offsite. amendment to the DCPP LRA that addition, one electronic copy of each
Staff Analysis: The proposed action identifies applicable changes to the CLB presentation should be emailed to the
involves only a change regarding the of the facility since the period of time DFO one day before the meeting. If an
submission of updates, which is covered in PG&E’s December 21, 2015, electronic copy cannot be provided
administrative in nature, and does not update by a date agreed upon between within this timeframe, presenters
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
involve any changes in the types or PG&E and the NRC. should provide the DFO with a CD
significant increase in the amounts of Additionally, pursuant to 10 CFR containing each presentation at least
effluents that may be released offsite. 51.22, the Commission has determined thirty minutes before the meeting.
III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is that the exemption request meets the Electronic recordings will be permitted
no significant increase in individual or applicable categorical exclusion criteria only during those portions of the
cumulative public or occupational set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the meeting that are open to the public.
radiation exposure. granting of this exemption will not have Detailed procedures for the conduct of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:16 Aug 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM 24AUN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58106/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-24 03:03:07
Document Modified: 2016-08-24 03:03:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Exemption; issuance. | |
| Dates | The exemption is effective on August 24, 2016. | |
| Contact | Michael J. Wentzel, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6459; email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 57942 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR