81 FR 5795 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Options Regulatory Fee

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 22 (February 3, 2016)

Page Range		5795-5796
FR Document		2016-01931
Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5795-5796]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-76995; File No. SR-C2-2016-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
Relating to the Options Regulatory Fee

January 28, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on January 14, 2016, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the 
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Options Regulatory Fee. The text 
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site 
(http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the 
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to decrease the Options Regulatory Fee 
(``ORF'') from $.0051 to $.0015 per contract in order to help ensure 
that revenue collected from the ORF, in combination with other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. The proposed fee change would be operative on 
February 1, 2016.
    The ORF is assessed by the Exchange to each Permit Holder for all 
options transactions executed or cleared by the Permit Holder that are 
cleared by The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in the customer 
range (i.e., transactions that clear in a customer account at OCC) 
regardless of the exchange on which the transaction occurs. In other 
words, the Exchange imposes the ORF on all customer-range transactions 
executed by a Permit Holder, even if the transactions do not take place 
on the Exchange. The ORF also is charged for transactions that are not 
executed by a Permit Holder but are ultimately cleared by a Permit 
Holder. In the case where a Permit Holder executes a transaction and a 
different Permit Holder clears the transaction, the ORF is assessed to 
the Permit Holder who executed the transaction. In the case where a 
non-Permit Holder executes a transaction and a Permit Holder clears the 
transaction, the ORF is assessed to the Permit Holder who clears the 
transaction. The ORF is collected indirectly from Permit Holders 
through their clearing firms by OCC on behalf of the Exchange.
    The ORF is designed to recover a material portion of the costs to 
the Exchange of the supervision and regulation of Permit Holder 
customer options business, including performing routine surveillances, 
investigations, examinations, financial monitoring, as well as policy, 
rulemaking, interpretive and enforcement activities. The Exchange 
believes that revenue generated from the ORF, when combined with all of 
the Exchange's other regulatory fees and fines, will cover a material 
portion, but not all, of the Exchange's regulatory costs. The Exchange 
notes that its regulatory responsibilities with respect to Permit 
Holder compliance with options sales practice rules have largely been 
allocated to FINRA under a 17d-2 agreement.\3\ The ORF is not designed 
to cover the cost of that options sales practice regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76309 (October 29, 
2015), 80 FR 68361 (November 4, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will continue to monitor the amount of revenue 
collected from the ORF to ensure that it, in combination with its other 
regulatory fees and fines, does not exceed the Exchange's total 
regulatory costs. The Exchange monitors its regulatory costs and 
revenues at a minimum on a semi-annual basis. If the Exchange 
determines regulatory revenues exceed or are insufficient to cover a 
material portion of its regulatory costs, the Exchange will adjust the 
ORF by submitting a fee change filing to the Commission. The Exchange 
notifies Permit Holders of adjustments to the ORF via regulatory 
circular. The Exchange endeavors to provide Permit Holders with such 
notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the 
change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 
6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ which provides that Exchange rules may provide 
for the

[[Page 5796]]

equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among 
its Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirement that the rules of 
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is reasonable because 
it would help the Exchange offset increased regulatory costs but would 
not result in total regulatory revenue exceeding total regulatory 
costs. Moreover, the Exchange believes the ORF ensures fairness by 
assessing higher fees to those Permit Holders that require more 
Exchange regulatory services based on the amount of customer options 
business they conduct. Regulating customer trading activity is much 
more labor intensive and requires greater expenditure of human and 
technical resources than regulating non-customer trading activity, 
which tends to be more automated and less labor-intensive. As a result, 
the costs associated with administering the customer component of the 
Exchange's overall regulatory program are materially higher than the 
costs associated with administering the non-customer component (e.g., 
Permit Holder proprietary transactions) of its regulatory program.\7\ 
The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory in that it is charged to all Permit Holders on 
all their transactions that clear in the customer range at the OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ If the Exchange changes its method of funding regulation or 
if circumstances otherwise change in the future, the Exchange may 
decide to modify the ORF or assess a separate regulatory fee on 
Permit Holder proprietary transactions if the Exchange deems it 
advisable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any 
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, because it applies to all 
Permit Holders. The proposed ORF is comparable to fees charged by other 
options exchanges for the same or similar service. The Exchange 
believes any burden on competition imposed by the proposed rule change 
is outweighed by the need to help the Exchange adequately fund its 
regulatory activities to ensure compliance with the Exchange Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \9\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-C2-2016-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-001. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-001 and should be 
submitted on or before February 24, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01931 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
5796 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 22 / Wednesday, February 3, 2016 / Notices

equitable allocation of reasonable dues, C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s communications relating to the
fees, and other charges among its Permit Statement on Comments on the proposed rule change between the
Holders and other persons using its Proposed Rule Change Received From Commission and any person, other than
facilities. Additionally, the Exchange Members, Participants, or Others those that may be withheld from the
believes the proposed rule change is The Exchange neither solicited nor public in accordance with the
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 6 received comments on the proposed provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
requirement that the rules of an rule change. available for Web site viewing and
exchange not be designed to permit printing in the Commission’s Public
unfair discrimination between III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Washington, DC 20549, on official
The Exchange believes the proposed Commission Action
business days between the hours of
fee change is reasonable because it The foregoing rule change has become 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
would help the Exchange offset effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) filing also will be available for
increased regulatory costs but would not of the Act 8 and paragraph (f) of Rule
inspection and copying at the principal
result in total regulatory revenue 19b–4 9 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule office of the Exchange. All comments
exceeding total regulatory costs.
change, the Commission summarily may received will be posted without change;
Moreover, the Exchange believes the
temporarily suspend such rule change if the Commission does not edit personal
ORF ensures fairness by assessing
it appears to the Commission that such identifying information from
higher fees to those Permit Holders that
require more Exchange regulatory action is necessary or appropriate in the submissions. You should submit only
services based on the amount of public interest, for the protection of information that you wish to make
customer options business they investors, or otherwise in furtherance of available publicly. All submissions
conduct. Regulating customer trading the purposes of the Act. If the should refer to File Number SR–C2–
activity is much more labor intensive Commission takes such action, the 2016–001 and should be submitted on
and requires greater expenditure of Commission will institute proceedings or before February 24, 2016.
human and technical resources than to determine whether the proposed rule For the Commission, by the Division of
regulating non-customer trading change should be approved or Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
activity, which tends to be more disapproved. authority.10
automated and less labor-intensive. As a IV. Solicitation of Comments Robert W. Errett,
result, the costs associated with
Interested persons are invited to Deputy Secretary.
administering the customer component
of the Exchange’s overall regulatory submit written data, views and [FR Doc. 2016–01931 Filed 2–2–16; 8:45 am]

program are materially higher than the arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P

costs associated with administering the including whether the proposed rule
non-customer component (e.g., Permit change is consistent with the Act.
Holder proprietary transactions) of its Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
regulatory program.7 The Exchange the following methods: COMMISSION
believes the proposed fee change is Electronic Comments
equitable and not unfairly • Use the Commission’s Internet [Release No. 34–76984; File No. SR–Phlx–
discriminatory in that it is charged to all comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 2016–07]
Permit Holders on all their transactions rules/sro.shtml); or
that clear in the customer range at the Self-Regulatory Organizations;
• Send an email to rule-comments@
OCC. sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
C2–2016–001 on the subject line. Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Proposed Rule Change to Make Minor
Statement on Burden on Competition Paper Comments Changes to Rule 1064, Crossing,
C2 does not believe that the proposed • Send paper comments in triplicate Facilitation and Solicited Orders
rule change will impose any burden on to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
competition that is not necessary or Commission, 100 F Street NE., January 28, 2016.
appropriate in furtherance of the Washington, DC 20549–1090. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
purposes of the Act, because it applies All submissions should refer to File Securities Exchange Act of 1934
to all Permit Holders. The proposed Number SR–C2–2016–001. This file (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
ORF is comparable to fees charged by number should be included on the notice is hereby given that on January
other options exchanges for the same or subject line if email is used. To help the 14, 2016, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
similar service. The Exchange believes Commission process and review your (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
any burden on competition imposed by comments more efficiently, please use Securities and Exchange Commission
the proposed rule change is outweighed only one method. The Commission will (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
by the need to help the Exchange post all comments on the Commission’s rule change as described in Items I, II,
adequately fund its regulatory activities Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ and III below, which Items have been
to ensure compliance with the Exchange rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the prepared by the Exchange. The
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Act. submission, all subsequent Commission is publishing this notice to
amendments, all written statements solicit comments on the proposed rule
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). with respect to the proposed rule change from interested persons.
7 Ifthe Exchange changes its method of funding change that are filed with the
regulation or if circumstances otherwise change in
the future, the Exchange may decide to modify the
Commission, and all written
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
ORF or assess a separate regulatory fee on Permit
8 15 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Holder proprietary transactions if the Exchange U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
deems it advisable. 9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:14 Feb 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM 03FEN1
Document Created: 2016-02-03 00:40:10
Document Modified: 2016-02-03 00:40:10
Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
FR Citation		81 FR 5795